Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well to be fair, I was inferring from the “marathon” analogy that you believe it the long-term potential here. This, in turn, is fairly easy to equate with an “invest” (and hold) as opposed to a (day)trade mentality. That’s all I was trying to unpack, my old friend
How do you reconcile this advice with the notion that this should be viewed as an investment?
What are these fools DOING?!?!
How long until mgmt is forced into ANOTHER R/S? Their rationale for the first was to satisfy QB minimum PPS requirements: that minimum is .01...
Wake me when this is at $15 a share—otherwise don’t bother.
I’m assuming that’s a sarcastic response? What real plan would involve allowing the PPS to plummet from .07 to .0002, then do a 1:150 RS, following which it tanked again from .03 to .002 recently? Soon we will be over 100M OS (if we’re not already there) and the AS still sits at 6B. There is ZERO silver lining here
You have ZERO credibility left.
Thanks for the continued validation.
Sincerely,
Those of us who were ridiculed, insulted, and generally dismissed while we asked tough questions, and demanded transparency and demonstrable results over the last 2+ years.
Dead in the water, it seems.
I agree about the OS being in the 80M+ range. But your data didn’t show EPS. TDA is suddenly showing -.82 EPS
TDA has updated EPS from -.006 to -.82: what has changed? They’re still showing OS as 18M—which is light by roughly a factor of 3...
NAILED IT.
Bottom line: -86% of POST R/S price. I doubt QB is interested in any excuses: when, therefore, do we anticipate the NEXT R/S? If CMTH does NOT conduct another, then they will contradict their rationale for conducting the one they like just did. What an absolute fiasco this is starting to look like...
+1,000,000
-85% post R/S—which itself reduced our share counts by 150x. Over/under on OS when it updates in April? I’m thinking 75-100M
Old news—and the market yawned...
Under Tim and Don, you can stick a fork in this: they’ve shown what they are capable of (and more importantly what they are NOT capable of)...
Looks like another R/S is gonna be inevitable. 2 in 1 year? Current PPS is DOWN 82% from POST R/S PPS of .03
As I said yesterday, that’s why TIm increased the voting strength of the preferred shares: dilution/conversion are continuing, and they don’t have the money to buy the shares themselves. Happy to be refuted if there are other plausible theories—absent that, I think the explanation above is what we are forced to go with.
I like your optimism! Just trying to assess the reality in the context of the inevitable possibility that, absent their ability to generate and sustain a PPS sufficient to remain above the QB listing minimum, they will be faced with the very same situation that necessitated (in their minds) the R/S that we just had a few weeks ago in the first place.
Much truth here! Do you see ANOTHER R/S as being likely within the next 6 months or so?
The only reason I can see for TIm to increase the voting potency of his PREFERRED shares is to counteract the impact of MASSIVE dilution/conversions that he fears may result in too many shares falling OUTSIDE his grasp—which would prevent him from losing the ability to exercise majority voting power. It also probably means they’re out of cash and can’t buy the converted/diluted shares themselves. As always, happy to be PROVEN wrong...
Unless you’re referring to ANOTHER R/S ALREADY
Um, my rental property is worth this company based on market cap
Newbies: BE WARNED. Virtually silent management that has been engaged in “commercialization” of CaverStem for 2 years—and as of the last Q reported something like 50 procedures TOTAL, netting about $1,600/procedure (though again, because they don’t operate explicitly and transparently, we don’t know for sure). Fell from .07 to .0001, followed by a 1:150 R/S—after which PPS was at .03. Earlier today it was in the .005X range. You do the math here...
The bottom is falling out (again) and management is nowhere in sight with comms (again). Shocking—but not surprising: patterns of behavior tell one EVERYTHING.
Bottom line: stay under .01, get ANOTHER R/S. That and the PPS are ALL that matters—the rest is NOISE
$CELZ is now 20% below the minimum PPS for OTCQB. @CMTH just effected a 1:150 R/S less than 2 months ago. How long until the NEXT one? Where is the “koolaid brigade” with their panegyrics and apologias?
And while they’re at it, they should institute REAL-TIME validation of “real” vs. pseudo shares so that investors can have better, more timely grasp on this critical factor affecting the OS of each stock they own.
Touched .0103 today=down almost 66% AFTER the 1:150 R/S. How long until we’re under .01, on notice again for potential delisting from QB, and facing the prospect of another R/S?Leopards don’t change them spots.
Yeah—because using email and prevailing on folks’ ability to read and think is so much LESS efficient. Alas the glacial “bear crawl” continues. NOT ANOTHER CENT FROM ME.
=.001 presplit. Yawn.
NO CAPITAL RESULTS—in fact, LOSS of massive market cap. Nothing else matters. Same approach that we’ve seen over the last 2+ years will net the same outcome. Bank on it.
Less than irrelevant: 2-year-old article—and where is the PPS to VALIDATE the value proposition? “Just stare at this picture long enough and you WILL see SOMETHING.” To those who espouse this mindset I offer a powerfully concise line from Euripides: “The truth is simple”: no need to overdress the RIGHT argument and approach.
Used car “Bait and Switch 101”. So many blind rabbit trails here it’s unreal.
It doesn’t take 2+ years to “get rid of weak shareholders.” P.S. if they don’t care about the PPS (as some dyed-in-the-wool long have claimed here in the past—arguing that they are “focused on running the business”), then they CERTAINLY don’t care about varying qualitative gradations of shareholders—weak, strong, or otherwise. Finally, what was true of the value of the patents was true 2+ years ago—and yet here we sit. Mismanagement par excellence.