Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sen. Jay Rockefeller says Obomba care is a disaster that will only get worse and the law itself is beyond comprehension!!
West Virginia Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, one of the towering architects of Obamacare, on Tuesday openly criticized program managers for not moving quickly enough to build the system, warning that if it gets off to a bumpy start it will just get worse.
Decrying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as way too complex, he warned the acting Medicare director that Obamacare is "so complicated and if it isn't done right the first time, it will just simply get worse."
"I believe that the Affordable Care Act is probably the most complex piece of legislation ever passed by the United States Congress. Tax reform obviously has been huge too, but up to this point it is just beyond comprehension," said Rockefeller.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obamacare-architect-rockefeller-its-beyond-comprehension/article/2526681
Sen. Jay Rockefeller says Obomba care a disaster that will only get worse and the law itself is beyond comprehension!!
West Virginia Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, one of the towering architects of Obamacare, on Tuesday openly criticized program managers for not moving quickly enough to build the system, warning that if it gets off to a bumpy start it will just get worse.
Decrying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as way too complex, he warned the acting Medicare director that Obamacare is "so complicated and if it isn't done right the first time, it will just simply get worse."
"I believe that the Affordable Care Act is probably the most complex piece of legislation ever passed by the United States Congress. Tax reform obviously has been huge too, but up to this point it is just beyond comprehension," said Rockefeller.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obamacare-architect-rockefeller-its-beyond-comprehension/article/2526681
Agreed...Luckily I found alternate ways to show the impersonality of nature other than corporal punishment.
I'll say it..
Mitrione is right and his suspension is bullshit.
PARENTS AS SCAPEGOATS
Most people dutifully profess love toward their children and parents. But often the past and present psychological differences, irrationalities, conflicts, demands, and "duties" make genuine love and enjoyment between parents and their children impossible. An important step toward emotional growth is to realize that no one has a duty to love anyone, not even parents, children, husband, wife.
Genuine love occurs only voluntarily, through a mutual exchange of objective and emotional values. Genuine love between parents and children can and does occur in those relationships in which objective values grow and are exchanged. Occasionally, parents may be partially responsible for some problems experienced by certain adolescents and young adults. Too often, however, parents are blamed for their grown children's faults, defaults, sexual shortcomings, and other problems for which those grown children themselves are responsible. Blaming parents only hides or avoids the self-responsibilities and efforts needed to correct one's own personal problems.
Major problems between parents and children often develop from the parents' failure to respect their own children: their failure to treat children as human beings with individual rights. Parents, for example, commonly initiate force and physically assault their children under the euphemisms of spankings, protection, discipline. If children are not granted respect, they may never develop respect for themselves, for their parents, or for values. Such children often develop into tomorrow's mystics and control freaks. They then survive by usurping their living as politicians, trouble-making lawyers, destructive bureaucrats, criminals, theologians, media journalists, or educators who hold little or no respect for honesty.
By contrast, the two most valuable gifts parents can give their children are (1) respect as conscious beings with individual rights, and (2) environments that promote honesty, assertive effort, integrity, independence, and the skill to perceive reality accurately.
EMOTIONS OF FEAR AND THE VALUE OF FEARLESSNESS
Objective fear is a valuable protection mechanism. By contrast, irrational fear is destructive whenever it stops a person from taking needed actions. Fortunately, the paralyzing effects of irrational fear can be overcome with direct, conscious effort. For example, if a person takes a rational action that he or she fears (if no actual danger exists), that fear will dissipate. Irrational fears can cause inaction that prevents deserving, productive people from developing prosperity and happiness. A fearlessness to live is perhaps the most financially and emotionally rewarding character trait that an honest, productive person can develop.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
Secular Humanism? Call it what you will.
THE HIGHEST CAUSE -- THE CONSCIOUS INDIVIDUAL
The highest cause in the universe is the well-being and happiness of the conscious individual. The individual -- a minority of one -- is the smallest, the most important, most unprotected of all minorities. If rights of the individual are protected, then rights are protected for everyone -- for Blacks, Chicanos, women, factory owners, factory workers, farmers, homosexuals. The concept of minority rights is meaningless, prejudicial, and destructive. In fact, that concept is a tool used by professional mystics and control freaks to usurp power and unearned values not by protecting but by violating the rights of individuals.
Only the concept of individual rights is meaningful and valid. The following table contrasts the anti-individual, control freak view to the pro-individual view.
ANTI-INDIVIDUAL VIEW
VERSUS
PRO-INDIVIDUAL VIEW
Anti-Individual View
(Platonistic Oriented)
The uncontrolled, free individual is by nature bad and harmful to conscious life. Morally, the individual must be controlled by external "authorities".
Group or government force is necessary to control the individual to make him do good.
The conscious individual is subordinate to society or to "higher" or "nobler" causes.
The use of force to compel individuals to comply with the "will" of society is moral.
The moral purpose of life is self-sacrifice in serving "higher" goals.
Pride is a character flaw.
Service to a government by conscription is necessary and proper.
Property belongs to society, the "people", or the government.
Social science is a valid, valuable science.
Populations consist of various groups of people, societies, and cultures.
Pro-Individual View
(Aristotelian Oriented)
The uncontrolled, free individual is by nature good and beneficial to conscious life. Morally, the individual must be free and remain free from external "authorities".
Both the individual and society function best when the individual is free from any group control, government force, or external "authority".
The conscious individual is the highest, noblest possible good or cause in the universe.
The use of initiatory force against any individual for any reason is immoral.
The moral purpose of life is to achieve rational happiness.
Pride is the result of moral virtue.
Service to a government or to any cause is proper only on a voluntary basis. Any form of conscription is forced sacrifice and evil.
Property is an earned entity. Thus, it can morally belong only to those individuals (or their businesses) who produced the values needed to earn that property.
Social science generally has little validity as a science, especially because it usually denies the individual as the prime entity of human life.
Populations, societies, and cultures consist of specific individuals.
Lets speak of "Morality" on a Social Scale.
Universal morals are objective. They are not based on opinions of Theologians or anyone else. Universal morals are not created or determined by anyone. No one can deem what is moral and what is not moral. The same moral standards exist for each and every human being throughout all locations, cultures, and ages. Those standards are independent of anyone's opinions or proclamations. Moreover, two and only two black-and-white moral standards exist. Those two moral standards are:
Any chosen action that purposely benefits the human organism or society is morally good and right.
Any chosen action that purposely harms the human organism or society is morally bad and wrong.
Feelings and emotions, on the other hand, cannot be considered as standards, absolutes, or morals. A person's life-style, desires, needs, and preferences can vary greatly without altering that person's character or without making that person morally right or wrong. Still, moral absolutes do exist. And following or violating moral absolutes determines a person's character and self-esteem. The two moral absolutes essential for prosperity and happiness are:
Integrated honesty for knowing reality
Integrated efforts for increasing productivity
Habitually violating either of those two moral absolutes precludes genuine prosperity and happiness. Related to those absolutes are the following moral issues:
Moral
Honesty
Self-esteem
Individual rights
* * *
Immoral
Sacrifice
Use of force
Ends justifying the means
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
Conscious striving for self-honesty. Unyielding loyalty to honesty. Productive effort. (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Pragmatic compromise and evasion of honesty. Habitual dishonesty. Parasitical laziness. (Immoral)
Moral Issue: Productivity.
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
Productive actions that increase values to others and society while increasing effectiveness in dealing with reality. (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Destructive actions that decrease values to others and society while decreasing effectiveness in dealing with reality. (Immoral)
Moral Issue: Individual Rights.
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
Recognition of the inalienable right everyone has to his or her own life and property. (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Denial of individual or property rights in order to plunder the life and property of others. (Immoral)
Moral Issue: Sacrifice.
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
Refusal to sacrifice is by nature life enhancing and thus is morally right. (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Sacrifice is "noble", especially when done for a "higher" cause or, better yet, no cause. (Immoral)
Moral Issue: Use of Force.
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
Rejecting the initiation of force, threat of force, coercion, or fraud against any individual for any reason is the foundation of morality. (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Use of force (especially government force) is acceptable against individuals, especially if the result serves the social "good" or a "higher" cause. (Immoral)
Moral Issue: Ends Justifying the Means.
Prosperity and Happiness Approach
In regards to force, the ends never justify the means. All moral actions are based on principles that prohibit initiatory force, threat of force, coercion, and fraud as a means to accomplish ends, no matter how "noble". (Moral)
Failure and Unhappiness Approach
Ends can justify the means. Force and coercion can be pragmatically used for the "good" of society. Individual rights can be violated or sacrificed for "noble" ends. (Immoral)
Religion and Mysticism as a Dishonest Control Tool and Value Destroyer
MYSTICISM AND DESTRUCTION
Religions and political systems contradict man's nature because they are based on mysticism and altruism. Those systems require the individual to contradict his or her nature through sacrifice. Under the spell of mysticism, one loses increasing portions of prosperity, life, love, and happiness to various imaginary "higher causes". And such losses are for no real reason except to support those Master Control Freaks who survive by manipulating dishonest, destructive, mystical notions. ...Mysticism contradicts the nature and needs of conscious beings. For, mysticism undermines the capacity for integrated thinking. Thus, mysticism reduces competitiveness, self-esteem, and psychuous pleasures. ...Mysticism leads to incompetence and unhappiness.
The more an individual surrenders to mysticism, the more that person becomes incompetent and tries to escape reality. For such a person, life increasingly becomes a source of conflict and pain. To the extent that one accepts mysticism is the extent that a person withdraws from life and loses contact with the pleasures and happiness that life inherently holds. ...All forms of mysticism (from fascism, Marxism, and wars to astrology, occultism, and religion) arise from ignorance, fraud, deceit, and the need to destroy values.
Mysticism is perpetuated by parasite control freaks who must undermine honesty in order to usurp their livings and pseudo self-esteems through value destruction. Such people must disregard or undermine the "burden of proof" concept. For that concept is the protector of honesty. The "burden of proof" concept requires that whoever makes an assertion has the burden to supply objective proof before credibility is granted to that assertion. People who promote mysticism either ignore the "burden of proof" concept or subvert the concept by passing off non sequiturs or specious rationalizations as "proof". In any case, mysticism by nature is the opposite of honesty, rationality, objectivity, and reality.
Political Correctness and Ostracism. Another scam of the NWO.
INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT VS. OPINIONS OF OTHERS
Acting on what others think rather than on one's own thinking not only undermines integrity and judgment, but diminishes self-esteem. That, in turn, gradually represses the best qualities within a person. In a free or semi-free society, everyone has the basic choice of acting on his or her independent judgment versus acting on the basis of what other people think, do, or say. In a totalitarian society, however, no such choice exists. The authorities terrorize everyone by coercion, force, and threats into acting on the basis of what some "authority" thinks or wishes (e.g., the dictator). By preventing people from acting on their own judgments, totalitarian governments deprive individuals of their natural survival mechanisms by undermining the independent use of their minds. Being unwilling or unable to act on one's own judgment, the individual is controllable by others -- by the whims, wishes, and demands of control freak "authorities".
The Scam of the ages..
CHRISTIAN CONDEMNATION OF EMOTIONS
Emotions are not subject to condemnation, guilt, or right or wrong judgments...only actions are right or wrong. Next to the mystical concept of original sin, perhaps the most pervasively damaging, unjust concept projected by the Christian ethic is the moral judgment of emotions. Especially malevolent and harmful are the condemnations of emotions such as found in the Sermon on the Mount: "But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." By condemning human emotions, Christian control freaks discovered an effective tool to condemn everyone...to make everyone guilty, keeping them more controllable for usurping power and values. Since everyone by nature possesses a full range of automatic feelings or emotions that cannot be directly controlled, shut off or stopped, nearly everyone is victimized by Christian-style "sin" and "guilt".
While everyone innocently experiences negative, irrational emotions, no one ever has to act on such emotions. And since only human actions are subject to choice, only human actions (not emotions) are subject to moral judgment.
Sounds like an Alien Entity.
I've mentioned as much before.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=86028047
Since there is no "hell", I take no offense.
Now kiss my ass.
Highly probable they will attack S. Korea.
180 Billion....that's less than 2 1/2 months of FED pumping.
Jobs bill?
50,000 jobs a month have been flowing to China for the last 10 years..
Yes, 50k per month. That's a lot of "revenue" that you so desperately love.
We need to cut spending
Excellent article...
The sheep need to read and heed.
Being an Atheist I usually look at such things with amusement but the below clips, even I find disturbing. This band Ghost is making headlines across the world for calling itself "nameless ghouls" and the lead singer as the "satanic pope". Very popular and more reason for lower church attendance among the world's youth. The satanic symbolism is very "in your face".
WHAT WILL YOU DO WHEN THEY TAKE ALL YOUR MONEY?
(Hint: They already have.)
Prior to last week's disturbing bureaucratic bank robbery stories from Cyprus, then New Zealand, then Canada — being piled on top of endless stories about drones, endless purchases of hollow point ammunition, and endless statements out of Washington always meaning exactly the opposite of what they say — I was feeling pretty sure that the real purpose of Washington's farcical rhetoric clearly foreshadowed its next immoral invasion of yet another unsuspecting country — only this time it would be this one! Land of the unfree and home of the kosher ripoff artists.
After all, everyone's the enemy of the U.S. government, even those who do their dirty work, dimwitted dupes scheduled for elimination once they've fulfilled their fraudulent functions.
But after the blatant robbery of its own people by the government of Cyprus to fatten the spending habits of these criminal international banks — and the revelation that first New Zealand and later Canada already had these same plans in the works BEFORE the European Union-controlled banks forced Cyprus to rob their own depositors — I'm no longer pretty sure about it — I'm certain.
And what a great idea!
The haircut from hell will save a great deal of bloodshed, and exterminate the needless boffins like you and me much more efficiently, plus with less pain for them and more pain for us. Now that's what I call a progressive social program.
Here I was thinking there'd be a town-by-town shootout between steroid addled U.S. Army troops fresh from their serial rapes of most Middle Eastern countries against vastly outgunned by seriously courageous informally organized militia types. What a bloodbath that would be! No one I've ever heard of has ever won a duel with a drone. Certainly no one will ever win two.
I don't care where you think you can hide. Drones and satellites can pick a pimple off a pumpkin, at night and in bad weather, anywhere in the world. They can see THROUGH things, as well, so there are no hiding places that don't utilize layers of lead.
There will be no big fight for freedom.
There will be damned few of these High Noon episodes, and the ones that do happen will be brief and predictable, since the whole planet is now surveillable, and Nightmare Nancy Pelosi and her phalanx of Jewish puppets will assure that most of the population has no guns, and no way to defend themselves from the high-tech SWAT teams now poised and practicing to swoop down upon them.
People will be begging for implanted surveillance chips just to get some food, even though both will be fatal.
That's why the haircut is a better way. When they say "We'll just take a little off the top", they are talking about from the neck up. What do you think all those FEMA coffins are for? Or the biotech food monopoly by a Jewish weapons manufacturer?
Why stage some fake disaster, or some false flag alien invasion, when they can just empty your wallet electronically and force you to beg — or kill — for food?
Why engage in random firefights when you can just take people's money on a whim and all at once, rendering them paralyzed, unable to buy food or find lodging in this camera infested world.
And the innocent and ignorant bystanders, starved out by government fiat, will have no choice but to get on the bus to the FEMA camps, where they will be promised food that will be poisoned and medicine that will make them sicker and more comatose than they already are.
Let's just say you won't be going home again, because your home, if it's not destroyed, will already have been sold to the next round of unsuspecting stooges by some powerful foreign investor.
Besides, you won't have any money to pay the rent or the mortgage payment because the government has already taken it from you, and infected you with some incurable disease, if it hasn't already beheaded you outright, or set you on the road to agonizing starvation with its typical run of popular biotech foodstuffs utterly devoid of nutrition.
Just imagine — death by Fritos and Five Hour Energy.
We know what all the hollow point bullets are for — us, at least the bullets not directly shipped to hired jihadists in Syria, Yemen or any other one of those bloody places we can't find on a map on a bet.
But most of those bullets will be used to defend the banks, and the so-called government offices, used on people clamoring for their money which has been taken so Obama's daughters can take their million-dollar vacations and those stock brokers who engineered the bailout can hire top-notch security companies to gun down the vagabonds who actually think they can steal their money back from the Jewish vultures who have taken it.
In case you haven't noticed, the game is over. Your sojourn to corpsedom is already scheduled somewhere in the bowels of the Department of Homeland Security fortress. Nanoaluminum in your lungs, nanocannibals in your bloodstream, and nano brains turning the world into the Island of Dr. Moreau for fun and profit.
The stupid cops are in on the program, never realizing that they too are scheduled for extinction once all the easy marks have been eliminated.
And the pliable soldiers so brainwashed into defending their country, this vaunted "global force for peace", have already been taken care of with these time-delayed vaccinations that guarantee their retirement bonuses will be an agonizing cancer tour through the Veterans Administration gulag where everyone is indifferent, overworked, and themselves about to suffer the same fate as the killer cops and the military robots.
So what will you do about it? Lay down and die (like so many elderly are already doing)? Petition your Congressperson and wait for an answer that never comes? Sue somebody in a court system that only recognizes the right of the fat cats who pay them their bribes after choosing the most corruptible people in the land to be judges? Or keep eating the roadside feces they serve at the chain eateries to keep the doctors in business?
The only way this game is not over is for everyone within earshot of this screed to go ballistic on every local official still pushing the 9/11 lie, or explaining the validity of these phony wars, or defending the right of conscienceless doctors to peddle poisons and create death panels while the most respectable people in American communities support the rights of the bankers who bribe them.
If you don't do this, and do it right now, then you may fully expect to be one of those irrelevant people declared superfluous flotsam by those rich pigs who HAVE taken the bribe and deem your impending death only a routine economic necessity.
Remember, the haircut from hell is "just a little off the top", from the neck up!
https://therebel.org/kaminski/597622-the-haircut-from-hell
WHAT WILL YOU DO WHEN THEY TAKE ALL YOUR MONEY?
(Hint: They already have.)
Prior to last week's disturbing bureaucratic bank robbery stories from Cyprus, then New Zealand, then Canada — being piled on top of endless stories about drones, endless purchases of hollow point ammunition, and endless statements out of Washington always meaning exactly the opposite of what they say — I was feeling pretty sure that the real purpose of Washington's farcical rhetoric clearly foreshadowed its next immoral invasion of yet another unsuspecting country — only this time it would be this one! Land of the unfree and home of the kosher ripoff artists.
After all, everyone's the enemy of the U.S. government, even those who do their dirty work, dimwitted dupes scheduled for elimination once they've fulfilled their fraudulent functions.
But after the blatant robbery of its own people by the government of Cyprus to fatten the spending habits of these criminal international banks — and the revelation that first New Zealand and later Canada already had these same plans in the works BEFORE the European Union-controlled banks forced Cyprus to rob their own depositors — I'm no longer pretty sure about it — I'm certain.
And what a great idea!
The haircut from hell will save a great deal of bloodshed, and exterminate the needless boffins like you and me much more efficiently, plus with less pain for them and more pain for us. Now that's what I call a progressive social program.
Here I was thinking there'd be a town-by-town shootout between steroid addled U.S. Army troops fresh from their serial rapes of most Middle Eastern countries against vastly outgunned by seriously courageous informally organized militia types. What a bloodbath that would be! No one I've ever heard of has ever won a duel with a drone. Certainly no one will ever win two.
I don't care where you think you can hide. Drones and satellites can pick a pimple off a pumpkin, at night and in bad weather, anywhere in the world. They can see THROUGH things, as well, so there are no hiding places that don't utilize layers of lead.
There will be no big fight for freedom.
There will be damned few of these High Noon episodes, and the ones that do happen will be brief and predictable, since the whole planet is now surveillable, and Nightmare Nancy Pelosi and her phalanx of Jewish puppets will assure that most of the population has no guns, and no way to defend themselves from the high-tech SWAT teams now poised and practicing to swoop down upon them.
People will be begging for implanted surveillance chips just to get some food, even though both will be fatal.
That's why the haircut is a better way. When they say "We'll just take a little off the top", they are talking about from the neck up. What do you think all those FEMA coffins are for? Or the biotech food monopoly by a Jewish weapons manufacturer?
Why stage some fake disaster, or some false flag alien invasion, when they can just empty your wallet electronically and force you to beg — or kill — for food?
Why engage in random firefights when you can just take people's money on a whim and all at once, rendering them paralyzed, unable to buy food or find lodging in this camera infested world.
And the innocent and ignorant bystanders, starved out by government fiat, will have no choice but to get on the bus to the FEMA camps, where they will be promised food that will be poisoned and medicine that will make them sicker and more comatose than they already are.
Let's just say you won't be going home again, because your home, if it's not destroyed, will already have been sold to the next round of unsuspecting stooges by some powerful foreign investor.
Besides, you won't have any money to pay the rent or the mortgage payment because the government has already taken it from you, and infected you with some incurable disease, if it hasn't already beheaded you outright, or set you on the road to agonizing starvation with its typical run of popular biotech foodstuffs utterly devoid of nutrition.
Just imagine — death by Fritos and Five Hour Energy.
We know what all the hollow point bullets are for — us, at least the bullets not directly shipped to hired jihadists in Syria, Yemen or any other one of those bloody places we can't find on a map on a bet.
But most of those bullets will be used to defend the banks, and the so-called government offices, used on people clamoring for their money which has been taken so Obama's daughters can take their million-dollar vacations and those stock brokers who engineered the bailout can hire top-notch security companies to gun down the vagabonds who actually think they can steal their money back from the Jewish vultures who have taken it.
In case you haven't noticed, the game is over. Your sojourn to corpsedom is already scheduled somewhere in the bowels of the Department of Homeland Security fortress. Nanoaluminum in your lungs, nanocannibals in your bloodstream, and nano brains turning the world into the Island of Dr. Moreau for fun and profit.
The stupid cops are in on the program, never realizing that they too are scheduled for extinction once all the easy marks have been eliminated.
And the pliable soldiers so brainwashed into defending their country, this vaunted "global force for peace", have already been taken care of with these time-delayed vaccinations that guarantee their retirement bonuses will be an agonizing cancer tour through the Veterans Administration gulag where everyone is indifferent, overworked, and themselves about to suffer the same fate as the killer cops and the military robots.
So what will you do about it? Lay down and die (like so many elderly are already doing)? Petition your Congressperson and wait for an answer that never comes? Sue somebody in a court system that only recognizes the right of the fat cats who pay them their bribes after choosing the most corruptible people in the land to be judges? Or keep eating the roadside feces they serve at the chain eateries to keep the doctors in business?
The only way this game is not over is for everyone within earshot of this screed to go ballistic on every local official still pushing the 9/11 lie, or explaining the validity of these phony wars, or defending the right of conscienceless doctors to peddle poisons and create death panels while the most respectable people in American communities support the rights of the bankers who bribe them.
If you don't do this, and do it right now, then you may fully expect to be one of those irrelevant people declared superfluous flotsam by those rich pigs who HAVE taken the bribe and deem your impending death only a routine economic necessity.
Remember, the haircut from hell is "just a little off the top", from the neck up!
https://therebel.org/kaminski/597622-the-haircut-from-hell
Good thing we have a Constitution to keep this ignoramus in check.
Obomba the Tryant: “I Am Constrained by the System Our Founders Put in Place”
During a speech in Denver, Colorado, President Obama remarked that his gun control agenda was “constrained by the system our founders put in place,” as he lambasted Second Amendment advocates who argue that gun ownership is a means of protection against government tyranny.
“Opponents of some of these common-sense laws have ginned up fears among responsible gun owners that have nothing to do with what’s being proposed and nothing to do with the facts, but feeds into this suspicion about government,” said Obama.
“You hear some of these quotes: “I need a gun to protect myself from the government.” “We can’t do background checks because the government is going to come take my guns away.”
“Well, the government is us. These officials are elected by you. They are elected by you. I am elected by you. I am constrained, as they are constrained, by a system that our Founders put in place. It’s a government of and by and for the people.”
At first glance, Obama’s admission that his actions are constrained by the authors of the Constitution is a seemingly glib nod to safeguards ensured by the bill of rights and the Second Amendment. However, when placed in a more sinister context, the quote could also be interpreted as a complaint that a President who in January introduced 23 executive orders to address “gun violence reduction” should be given an even greater free reign to take a bite out of gun rights.
Recall that back in July 2011 during a speech on immigration, Obama lamented that, “doing things on my own” (becoming a dictator) was “very tempting”.
Obama also remarked, “I am not a dictator” during the sequester debate in early March.
As Infowars has documented, Obama has flagrantly violated the Constitution in all manner of different ways, from undermining the power of Congress (an act of high treason according to Congressman Walter Jones) by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary, to accepting rotating status as chairman of the United Nations Security Council, which is a direct violation of article 1, section 9, clause 8 of the Constitution.
Obomba the Tryant: “I Am Constrained by the System Our Founders Put in Place”
During a speech in Denver, Colorado, President Obama remarked that his gun control agenda was “constrained by the system our founders put in place,” as he lambasted Second Amendment advocates who argue that gun ownership is a means of protection against government tyranny.
“Opponents of some of these common-sense laws have ginned up fears among responsible gun owners that have nothing to do with what’s being proposed and nothing to do with the facts, but feeds into this suspicion about government,” said Obama.
“You hear some of these quotes: “I need a gun to protect myself from the government.” “We can’t do background checks because the government is going to come take my guns away.”
“Well, the government is us. These officials are elected by you. They are elected by you. I am elected by you. I am constrained, as they are constrained, by a system that our Founders put in place. It’s a government of and by and for the people.”
At first glance, Obama’s admission that his actions are constrained by the authors of the Constitution is a seemingly glib nod to safeguards ensured by the bill of rights and the Second Amendment. However, when placed in a more sinister context, the quote could also be interpreted as a complaint that a President who in January introduced 23 executive orders to address “gun violence reduction” should be given an even greater free reign to take a bite out of gun rights.
Recall that back in July 2011 during a speech on immigration, Obama lamented that, “doing things on my own” (becoming a dictator) was “very tempting”.
Obama also remarked, “I am not a dictator” during the sequester debate in early March.
As Infowars has documented, Obama has flagrantly violated the Constitution in all manner of different ways, from undermining the power of Congress (an act of high treason according to Congressman Walter Jones) by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary, to accepting rotating status as chairman of the United Nations Security Council, which is a direct violation of article 1, section 9, clause 8 of the Constitution.
You would "imagine" so?
What "war" did Congress declare? Please refresh my memory.
Obama budget to take aim at wealthy IRAs..You didnt earn that!
President Obama’s budget, to be released next week, will limit how much wealthy individuals – like Mitt Romney – can keep in IRAs and other retirement accounts.
The proposal would save around $9 billion over a decade, a senior administration official said, while also bringing more fairness to the tax code.
The senior administration official said that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/domestic-taxes/292071-obama-budget-to-target-wealthy-iras
Show Pics of a dead Osama Bin Laden!!
Micky Mouse hates Obomba..Disney to begin layoffs in studio, consumer products.
Walt Disney Co expects to begin layoffs at its studio and consumer product divisions within the next two weeks, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, in the latest cost-reduction step to emerge from a company-wide review.
The studio job cuts will center on the marketing and home video units and include a small number from the animation wing, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the plans had not been made public.
It is unknown how many jobs will be lost at either division.
Staff reductions at the consumer products unit will largely result from attrition, another person said.
On Wednesday, Disney began layoffs at the 30-year-old LucasArts games studio it inherited with the acquisition of George Lucas' film company last year, as it focuses on licensing its "Star Wars" brand externally.
A Disney spokeswoman had no comment.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/05/us-disney-layoffs-idUSBRE93401H20130405
Are You A Teenager Who Reads News Online? According to the Justice Department, You May Be a Criminal
Hearst Corporation’s family of publications. If you read the terms of use for the Houston Chronicle, the San Francisco Chronicle, or Popular Mechanics websites, you’ll find this language, screamed in all-caps:
"YOU MAY NOT ACCESS OR USE THE COVERED SITES OR ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT IF YOU ARE NOT AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD.”
In the DOJ’s world, this means anyone under 18 who reads a Hearst newspaper online could hypothetically face jail time. But Hearst’s publications aren’t the only ones with overly restrictive usage terms. U-T San Diego and the Miami Herald have similar policies. Even NPR is guilty, saying teenagers can’t access their “services” (including the site, NPR podcasts and the media player) without a permission slip:
“If you are between the ages of 13 and 18, you may browse the NPR Services or register for email newsletters or other features of the NPR Services (excluding the NPR Community) with the consent of your parent(s) or guardian(s), so long as you do not submit any User Materials.”
Some sites must have recognized the problem and crafted their policies to only forbid users under the age of 13. These include the New York Times, the Boston Globe, and the Arizona Republic. NBCNews.com uses this wording:
"By using or attempting to use the Site or Services, you certify that you are at least 13 years of age or other required greater age for certain features and meet any other eligibility and residency requirements of the Site.”
This means that inquisitive 12-year-olds who visit NBCNews.com to learn about current events would be, by default, misrepresenting their ages. Again, this could be criminal under the DOJ's interpretation of the CFAA.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/04/are-you-teenager-who-reads-news-online-according-justice-department-you-may-be
Are You A Teenager Who Reads News Online? According to the Justice Department, You May Be a Criminal
Hearst Corporation’s family of publications. If you read the terms of use for the Houston Chronicle, the San Francisco Chronicle, or Popular Mechanics websites, you’ll find this language, screamed in all-caps:
"YOU MAY NOT ACCESS OR USE THE COVERED SITES OR ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT IF YOU ARE NOT AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD.”
In the DOJ’s world, this means anyone under 18 who reads a Hearst newspaper online could hypothetically face jail time. But Hearst’s publications aren’t the only ones with overly restrictive usage terms. U-T San Diego and the Miami Herald have similar policies. Even NPR is guilty, saying teenagers can’t access their “services” (including the site, NPR podcasts and the media player) without a permission slip:
“If you are between the ages of 13 and 18, you may browse the NPR Services or register for email newsletters or other features of the NPR Services (excluding the NPR Community) with the consent of your parent(s) or guardian(s), so long as you do not submit any User Materials.”
Some sites must have recognized the problem and crafted their policies to only forbid users under the age of 13. These include the New York Times, the Boston Globe, and the Arizona Republic. NBCNews.com uses this wording:
"By using or attempting to use the Site or Services, you certify that you are at least 13 years of age or other required greater age for certain features and meet any other eligibility and residency requirements of the Site.”
This means that inquisitive 12-year-olds who visit NBCNews.com to learn about current events would be, by default, misrepresenting their ages. Again, this could be criminal under the DOJ's interpretation of the CFAA.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/04/are-you-teenager-who-reads-news-online-according-justice-department-you-may-be