Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Never got much comfort from the " this aint bad because Ive seen worse" reasoning.
Yep, more sloppy lawyering. Amazing given the rep of the plaintiff firm. Must be one of the juniors on the case.
Hey average investor. great minds think alike. Props to you dude. Don't foret the damages. Hmmm, I could use a public shell. LOL
Yeah just checked, Synter isnt 551. Some other poor schmuck is.
Either one of two things. Megas is a genius or this is a sloppy, badly thought out lawsuit. Negative implications to the plaintiffs are huge imo.
what you cite can be used to justify the private info release to the court, but not to the public.
Courts and Financial companies are under Privacy acts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_Act_of_1974 AND
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/glbshort.shtm
My Fido broker said nada about legal action. Said they would give me copies of transactions and statements. Woohoo.
Any measure than suing knowlingly innocent people for fraud on a gamble.
I just read it again. The defendants in Count One agree that the false certs are valid. Count One incorporates Factual Allegations that we were participants in a scheme to deceive and defraud Bancorp. Bancorp may have dropped the monetary penalty requests, but it still is alleging fraud against us, plus it has reserved the right to sue us in the future for #2-#5,
I believe the heat put on by defendants and their attorneys caused the plaintiffs to start to back down. Thus the bone thrown by dismissing some counts. Im still a defendant in a stock fraud suit though. Nothing much has changed as far as that goes.
Either this suit was some brilliant scheme or Megas and his attorneys are really bad chess players.
Nothings changed imo. Still being sued for securities fraud.
I do not believe we will need to worry about those counts again.
Believe what you will. Technically you are incorrect.
Thanks eom
Im one of the few calling this bs from the beginning. You the one shucking and a jiving since the suit came out.
Do you channel him too?
I don't know you that well. But I aint got nuttin against weird people. They are usually more fun. LOL
Is that the court website with the suit listed? Anybody got it? Post it please. TIA
Looks like megas communicates only through ohbull and 500. Weird.
Someone got the link to the dismissal? Still waiting.
You dredging up the naked short boogie man again? LOL. Lets add how megas sued us all for stock fraud to get this thing trading again. LOLOL
I made a lot of comments of my opinion. Mostly so far been right on target. You and the megasites have been the ones corrected as we go.
Yeah whats holding up that 10K?
Really? An outrage? Whodathunkit? Must be a basher.
You call this guy smart?
Probably better imo.
Glasz, they arnt my lawfirm. Im just saying, the doodoo's going to start to fly as all these types get into this. Megas is to blame imo. Man I would trade for an R/S over this bs in a heartbeat. LOL
catch 22- gotta pay to play
Yeah man $500, thats cheap, its just for starters. Maybe you are starting to get that feeling many have had since this bs began? THe drain on the old savings account? Now you are finally beginning to see whats coming down the road after the answer. Of course, easy to get out of it, just give up the shares. You can save all those nasty legal fees. Megas what a genius!
Face it guys, the "Megas is our friend who sued us and may generously drop you from the suit if you give back your shares" gig is up. The proverbial doodoo is about to start hitting the fan.
Stop trying to talk people out of counsel. Many don't need to answer this crazy thing.
Figuring it on the fly I guess.
oh never mind
Giving up those shares ohbull so you can get released?
DO you see us able to trade after the suit? Show me where in the suit this is stated? Where do you get so assured?
In other words, you are totally full of it.
Felt real comfy chatting eh?
Thats awfully selfish of you. What about shareholders rights?
You really are real cozy with the plaintiff attorney, huh. Think we are onto something here folks.
Before thier company sued them for holding honestly come by electronic shares, it never was an issue. The company forced the issue by filing a suit against them accusing them of stock/mail fraud. If there would not have been a suit against these innocents, they would not have to negotiate to keep their own stock. They would not have to hire an attorney to protect a small amount. Now they willl have to give it up to be released from the suit. They will lose their legal fees already in, time and amount they invested. That what YOU said YOU heard from the plaintiffs attorney. YOU called.