gdepc, are you going to answer any of the questions I posed? Come on, if you are going to make wild claims, then you need to be prepared to post some substantiation.

Please answer my questions.

gdepc, I have been thru the CYGX doors far more times than you have even imagined. I fell in love with this technology before you were aware of its existence. I have watched CEO's come and go in our corporation. Are you sure you want to get into a peeing match concerning the ebbs and flows of fortune ... and the underlying reasons for those ebbs and flows? BTW, what have you heard about ISIS lately? Whatever happened to our association with them? Any idea why we have not brought the anti-ICAM to market?

Do you really want to open that can of worms? Think long and hard before you answer. Each of those had a reason and was preventable.

2.remember 3 cents a share
Rent not paid
Salaries not paid

Greetings Sir Happy ... I have not received an e-mail from you concerning the shares that you are eligible to vote in the CYGX SHM - unless you are one of those who did not include any posting aliases. Your posts leave the obvious impression that you are not in favor of it. Please drop an email with the number of shares you will be voting and state your support or opposition to the proposition(s) to be voted on to:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

If you don't mind also include your alias and any other contact information. Other comments are also welcomed.

Golly Doctor Rick, and we thought the cobras were bad:

Victim Of Chimp Mauling Out Of Coma

POSTED: 10:58 am CDT June 13, 2005

WEST COVINA, Calif. -- A California man mauled by two chimpanzees in March has been brought out of his medically induced coma.

His attorney said 62-year-old Saint James Davis has begun his slow recovery. Davis was attacked by two chimps while he and his wife were visiting their own pet chimp at a wildlife sanctuary near Bakersfield.

Davis was attacked while he and his wife LaDonna were visiting the Animal Haven Ranch outside Bakersfield to celebrate the 39 birthday of their pet monkey Moe.

While the couple was standing outside Moe's cage with a birthday cake, two other chimps escaped and attacked them. They chewed off most of Saint James Davis's face, tore off his foot and attacked his limbs and genitals.

The owner of the animal sanctuary is asking state authorities to find Moe a new home.

Be careful with the "partnering" ... seems like whenever they partner with someone via a license arrangement, they end up either suing and losing or getting sued ... or there is a not so nice divorce. Remember PCCA?

Hey, that might be the justification for giving them all these additional options ... I'll bet a couple of folks on this thread could make a case for that.

They are always “contacting”, “engaging”, “partnering”, and just all around “associating” with everyone and anyone.

Even here in the old double wide, this is insulting to the intelligence of the thread:

This part I thought interesting because if Cytogenix did go to a bank, the information provided by Alfa could put CYGX over the top for a loan

Incidentally, most people who graduated the seventh grade know who a hogger is and that he gets paid well into the six digit range for what he accomplishes.

Unfortunately, this give-away scheme is not a progressive step for the company. It is a scheme that only benefits a select few and does that to the detriment of the shareholders who have put their money on the line.

And please, don't try to feed me a line of bull that includes a bunch of words like "might, may, could, if, maybe, etc." That kind of veiled rationale may work just fine with pre-kindergarten kids, but it is an affront and insult to anyone over the age of ten years. The investors here are not like the blind sheep on the NESS board and many of us greatly resent being communicated with in that condescending manner, so to you and Scooby, "Stow it."

You are trying to defend the indefensible.

this may be a hint to the shares holders that profitability is at the threshold .

This should be viewed with the same great anticipation as all of the other "hints" that prosperity was just around the corner. Get real.

Is it possible for you to make a post that is not terminally infected with IFFY ... and why are you continuing to perpetuate the myth of the $ .70 shares ...

IFFY theu get the PPS to $10.70, then by all means us other millionaires will happily reward them generously .... IFFY the bring new products to market we will happily watch them become rich beyond even your imagination ... IFFY, IFFY, IFFY.

Grow up Scooby, they have been paid and their current wages may even be excessive for the results they have produced, but I don't think anyone is complaining about their current wages ... we3 are just opposed to this giveaway scheme that will be administered by a committee made up of the beneficiaries.

Is there any evidence that points to you not being part of the insiders club????

Rick, remember the deadly problem you and your team solved for us back in Nam ... hmmmmm ... we need a couple of those magical shots now .... lololol.

This is a first class display of "monkey business" ... again, right down your line ..... hmmmmmmm ..... actually, you have probably got a couple of monkeys we could train for the job ..... rofl ....

Paulness,

I have looked at the option plan from ALL angles and no matter how I look at it, it is wrong and in no manner beneficial to the shareholders. It is only beneficial to the very select few who are receiving the options.

It will NOT help the PPS for anyone. It will HURT the exisitng shareholders by diluting the stock even further. That is the end result ... plain and simple.

I have known Lawrence for many years and this is typical of what I would expect from him. The silly little business about the company gaining millions of dollars is total smoke and mirrors.

The CFO's time would be far better spent finding sources of revenue in manners that are beneficial to the corporation instead of trying to rake in more share options.

If management truely wants to have all these options and infuse all that cash, then they should readjust their existing options to a reasonable strike price and exericse them.

Management should cease this nonsensical BS they are trying to cram down shareholders throats and concentrate on increasing the share price by actually getting products to market, inking licensing agreements, obtaining meaningful grants and and other ethical means of raising revenue.

There is a very good reason that CYGX management receives less than 1/3 the industry average wage and that is because management has functioned in such manner that their results have earned and justified just that amount. Get enough products to market and none of us will object to half million dollar salaries. THEN (and only then) will they have earned them.

Sorry about posting the same info you just posted ... unfortunately, the source of ther info by gdpec and you and I is in a section concerning who can vote and how many shares they can vote ... it is not included in the section ocncerning the proposition we are to vote on.

The most important verbiage in the proposition is this:

Administration. The Compensation Committee of the Board will administer the Option Plan. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to construe and interpret the Option Plan; amend and rescind rules relating to the Option Plan; make all necessary determinations for the administration of the Option Plan; determine whether Options will be granted alone or in combination or in tandem with other Options; and determine whether cash will be paid or Options will be granted in replacement of, or as alternatives to, other incentives. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee may correct any defect or inconsistency in the Option Plan or in any Option and has the authority to take all other actions it deems necessary or advisable for the proper administration of the Option Plan.

HC, here is the continuation of the post by gdpec:

Also includes shares underlying options that are exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 11,033,334 shares of Common Stock as follows: Dr. Skolnick (5,000,000 shares with a strike price of $0.185 per share), Mr. Wunderlich (3,200,000 shares with a strike price of $0.185 per share), Mr. Vazquez (2,000,000 shares with a strike price of $0.185 per share), Dr. Parazynski (250,000 shares with a strike price of $0.185 per share), Dr. Stein (250,000 shares with a strike price of $0.185 per share), Mr. Ocampo (166,667 shares with a strike price of $0.61 per share) and Dr. Rossi (166,667 shares with a strike price of $0.83 per share).

CFO's: The Corporate Culprits in Charge?
Saturday, June 11, 2005
By Susan C. Walker

Before HealthSouth and Richard Scrushy (whose jury can't seem to come to a conclusion about his guilt or innocence), there was WorldCom and Bernie Ebbers.

Remember him? He's the ex-CEO who was found guilty this past March on nine counts of accounting fraud. He's about to be sentenced on June 13. The jury didn't buy Ebbers' claim that he knew nothing about the accounting fraud at WorldCom, and that it was all the work of the company's chief financial officer.

Yet, the jury may have gotten this one wrong, since it looks like CFOs are now more important than CEOs when it comes to running corporate America. Let me tell you why….

It came to me in a dream the night after Deep Throat, the high-level source from the Watergate days, revealed his identity. In my dream, I was just like the Washington Post's Bob Woodward: I crossed paths with a mentor who was 30 years my senior, early in my writing career. It seemed like he was a top guy at a major regulatory agency in Washington, D.C. He gave me one reliable tip after another on business stories. He kept telling me that if I wanted to understand the business world, I had to stay close to the money. He made me promise never to talk about him with any of my colleagues – so I nicknamed him "Deep Pockets."

My dream grew much more exciting. Deep Pockets helped me uncover a huge story: it had something to with a guy named Charles Keating and the collapse of many savings & loans. Just like Deep Throat, Deep Pockets arranged to meet me clandestinely – in an underground bank vault. Thanks to my investigative work on that story, I wrote a book called All the Officer's Loans. To top everything off, my book became a movie in my dream. Sandra Bullock played me, the dedicated reporter.

What a blockbuster dream! When I woke up, I heard the echo of my underground conversations with Deep Pockets: "Stay close to the money," he said. "That means stay close to the financial wizards at every company you write about. They are more important than the CEO. In fact, they are the real CEOs."

That advice actually has proved more than worthwhile for anyone who followed the spate of corporate scandals since 2000. Hasn't it been true in each and every trial that the CEO wants us to believe that he didn't know a thing about the accounting fraud going on at his company?

Today's CEOs merely own up to what Deep Pockets told me in my dream. If you want to know who's really running the company, look no farther than the CFO.

Enron – CEO Kenneth Lay says he didn't know anything about the fraud. He says it was orchestrated by Enron's CFO, Andrew Fastow.

WorldCom – CEO Bernie Ebbers famously blamed his CFO Scott Sullivan for the $11 billion accounting fraud, saying that he didn't even understand profit and loss statements.

HealthSouth – CEO Richard Scrushy doesn't blame just one CFO; he blames all five, saying they were the ones who pulled off the $2.7 billion fraud.

So is it time to skip the CEOs and go straight to the CFOs? Maybe we've had it all wrong. As companies have stopped being about what they do or create -- and started being more about how they can finance things -- it is the chief financial officer who's become the real power. The chief exec has become a figurehead, who benefits from, yet is beholden to, the scheme of the person who "keeps the books."

Take a look at General Motors Corp. GM used to be a carmaker whose former president, Charles Wilson, was fond of saying, "What's good for America is good for General Motors and vice versa."

Today, it's just as much a finance company through its GMAC Financial Services organization. And it's not just making car loans. A June 9 Wall Street Journal article pointed out that, "In the first quarter of this year, General Motors Corp. made more money on mortgages than on cars or car loans."

It's also a carmaker-turned-financier whose massive corporate debt issue ($136 billion outstanding, second only to GE) has been officially rated "junk." So now GM says it will lay off 25,000 workers in three years to try to turn around its North American operations. Who got to deliver that bad-news message? The CEO. But who's really running the company? Look to the CFO.

In Greek tragedies, it used to be the hubris of the main character that brought him or her down. Some kind of pride before the fall. Now, CEOs in their courtroom dramas don't want to prove how smart they are. They want to prove how oblivious and unconnected they are to the companies they lead.

Call it a good defense, or call it what it really is -- a sign of how U.S. companies are now much busier finding ways to move money around than trying to actually produce useful goods and services. When our economy depends on finance rather than production, we create not only know-nothing CEOs but also a no-nothing manufacturing base.

Perhaps that's not so good for America after all.

Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. She received her B.A. in Classics from Stanford University.

I may not have made myself clear ... the compensation committee can set the price at any level they want to set it without any shareholder approval ... theoretically even a nickle a share.

That aside, where is anything said that sets the strike price at $ .70??? Please help me because I can't find that price anywhere.

Those who have not expressed their opinions and given an indication of their opposition are asked to email their name and the number of shares they will be voting to:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Additional contsct info and aliases will be appreciated, but certainly not required.

That has been something that many of us would like to see. I don't want someone to represent that an email is where we should place our faith insofar as the strike price is concerned. Read the quote below.

Of course, even if such is stated, is there any reason that the compensation committe which is dominated by beneficiaries of the give away scheme cannot rely on the following paragraph to justify reducing the price to ten cents because they feel they they have sacrificed and worked hard enough to justify a lower giveaway price??

Amendment of Option Plan. The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may amend or alter the Option Plan at any time and from time to time without the approval of shareholders, unless shareholder approval is required by federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the Common Stock may then be listed or quoted. Rights and obligations under any Option granted before amendment of the Option Plan shall not be materially altered or impaired adversely by such amendment, except with consent of the person to whom the Option was granted.

Basically you are correct in a reverse split in and of itself not being particularily actionable. However, if the scenario of all shareholders not being given the same terms and options granted now not being subject to a reduction equal to the reverse percentage were to prevail, then that would indeed be basis for serious litigation ... or am I wrong?

That said, I still do subscribe to a belief that one is being contemplated ... however, I could be wrong.

This is just one more reason that this stock giveaway is a very dangerous move at this itme. The more power that is concentrated in a few hands is just not a scenario that will benefit we common shareholders.

Even without considering the so-called justifications for adding 18MM shares primarily in the hands of a very small select few in management, the potential for misuse is just too great for us to allow it to happen.

I personally do not subscribe to the reverse-split scenario because coupled with the current and past stock giveaways, that would lead to lawsuits up the gazooo. The current proposals have an eerily number of shareholders bringing up that possibility and we do not need the added burden of defending a major class aciton lawsuit. That considered, I just can't see the possibility of a reverse split.

Interesting that you post that "CytoGenix Inc. has not paid any fees in association with this web broadcast."

The website says:

Companies featured by PrBroadcast.com pay consideration to PrBroadcast Inc. for electronic dissemination of company information, and in some cases, for consulting services. All statements and expressions are the opinion of the companies featured and are not meant to be a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. PrBroadcast.com or PrBroadcast Inc. are not registered investment advisors or a broker dealer. While it is our goal to feature equity investments in micro or small capitalization companies that have the potential for long-term appreciation, investments in the companies reviewed are considered to be a high risk and use of the information provided is at the investor's sole risk. PrBroadcast.com and PrBroadcast Inc. may act as a consultant to the companies reviewed in this website and may be remunerated by these companies or its shareholders for investor relation services.

and then it says:

PRBroadcast.com, a Subsidiary of PrBroadcast Inc. (who along with its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, representatives and agents is collectively referred to as " PrBroadcast Inc ." or Publisher) maintains this web site as a service to its customers, who have paid for the publication of the materials regarding their respective company or business.

http://www.prbroadcast.com/stage3/disclaimer.asp

No4get-N-U, thanks for the confirmation of what I have been told by others ...

Is there anyone on the board who can explain in simple English how this 15% of equity giveaway is going to benefit the shareholders and help the corporation actually bring a product to market?

having received an email from a corporate officer i can only repeat what i read from him...they deserve it because of their past sacrifices and they want to keep the talent...

To all shareholders:

It is being suggested by some shareholders that the stated justification for this latest share giveaway is that management feels it has earned it by reasons of their sacrifices and that their current compensation is not within the averages for other officers in the industry.

It is also being speculated that management is hoping to have a larger percentage of the outstanding shares in order to be able to insure that their proposals will prevail, irrelevant of the desires of the other shareholders. In other words, they would be able to simple make a decision and have the ability to implement it without the fear of opposition.

How about a lively dialog on these two ideas? Let's have both proponents and opposition views.

Emotions are running very high and hot on this entire matter. If you have not already done so, please indicate your preference and any comments you have by emailing:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Please include the number of shares you can vote and it would be appreciated if you would also include the alias you post under. The latter is optional.

Scooby, that is unbelievably absurb ... even for you:

Personally HC, when determining pay it's goes by title. You pay the mail room people $10 an hour and what have you. When you have the title of a CEO/CFO in a publically traded company there is a certain amount you expect them to make. As an industry they are getting paid well below the scale.

Reward should be based on performance and successes.

Check out this report on AVI and you immediately see some glaring differences ... $38 MM on hand, $5MM in government grants ... 42MM shares ... advanced testing ... and a share price of over 2.30.

If our PP's were in the $20 MM+ range we would be in an entirely different ballpark.

Check out their Bizwire 1st quarter report ...

And yes, WHEN we get to that level, pay should increase dramatically.

That is cold blooded .... accurate, but wow ... icewater in the veins ... good analogy.

Oh, I forgot to mention. There is another way to get a ribbon. You can take someone else's ribbon or little pieces of many people's ribbons and make them your own.

Has anyone received a reply and an explanation ... if so, what and why?

Scooby, I can't find a single post where anyone has even hinted that anyone should provide their services for nothing ... nobody works for free. Everyone is getting paid a fair wage for what has been accomplished. IF a product come to market and is wildly successful, they should be paid one heck of a lot more. IF animal trials are successful, they should get raises ... same if we suddenly get a hugh infusion of cash and can expand our research and development.

Not all CEOs get paid millions for heading wildly successful corporations. Look at Southwest Airlines for instance. No other airline comes close to their success record of profitable quarters, but their CEO makes less that three quarters of a million.

One of the great aspects of real estate peddling is that you get paid based entirely on your successes. You get paid when everything is signed, sealed and delivered ... ie, at the closing.

All that said, I don't think forks are upset with the fact that a stock option is being offered. From the responses, they are upset with the amounts being proposed and the timing. That timing just isn't good. Such a request should have been made AFTER deals were made ... not before they have moved to closing.

Remember all of the times we have been told that great deals were in the works and just around the corner? How about all the 'sushi' talk. There is a lot of talk and rumors flying right now, but as the sweet little lady used to ask, "Where is the beef?"

I think most folks are just asking for someone to give them a reason to not oppose this move. At this point in time it is a Reverse Robin Hood Scheme and nobody has offered any real justification.

Most of us LOVE CYGX, but are opposed to what we see as a move that is detrimental to the overall good.

Here is the link to the actual verbiage .... everyone should read it for themselves and then they will be better equipt to comment.

http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/showFilingOutline.go?symbol=CYGX&name=CYTOGENIX%20INC:%20PR...

gdepc, there are so many different numbers posted on so many different forms and sites that this has reached cluster-flop proportions. Same with strike prices. Scooby says seventy or eighty cents a share and other filings reference eighteen and a half ... or even less.

That said, even taking the more conservative of those numbers it is very difficult to justify a big give away at this time ... having a fifteen percent dilution still seems to be the same as being told that fifteen thousand out of even hundred shares are going to be taken away from us shareholders and given to a select few. Am I wrong about that?

... cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net ...

This is addy that is collecting opinions concernign the 18MM Reverse Robin Hood share giveaway.

If you haven't sent your opinion, proxy pledge or other comment, please do so. Several dozen shareholders representing several million shares have already contacted us so.

Also, please ask other shareholders who do not follow this board to contact us so we will have a better idea of how deep the dissatisfaction with the proposals goes.

My personal thanks to all who have responded for keeping their comments on a pretty darned high plateau. This is NOT a basher effort nor is it a solicitation of personal attacks.

Okay, Scoob, we HAVE been paying them.

Presently Malcolm has 8,518,123 shares plus 5,000,000 options that have not been exercised yet.

Well, at todays prices, that equates to over SIX MILLION dollars already paid and another THREE POINT SEVEN available.

Lawrence has 5,512,875 shares plus 3,200,000 options that have not yet been exercised.

That works out to over THREE POINT EIGHT paid and another TWO POINT FOUR available.

Now they are talking about 18,000,000 more.

Enough is enough; they have been compensated for the job they have done up to this point. Don't forget they do get a salary each year.

Scooby, you do make a good point in stating that, "they have no income yet." That is an excellent point. It also begs the question, "WHY?"

They have become multimillionaires without actually providing any products. But, that is not the question. The question is, have they done enough to be allowed to award themselves millions of additional shares without bringing a product to market that will provide a cash flow.

Even if they were to be able to bring about an infusions of ... say ... fifteen million dollars and dilute the stock only twenty percent, this massive giveaway would not be justified ... would it?

Tell me what their financial status was when they came on board and prove that they have suffered hunger and exposure to the elements and we can start a dialog based on that.

Again you state some very good points just like you did a year ago:

skooby

compensation to officers of cygx or any other public company is my right as a shareholder to know

Arnold said Compensation of stock and salary increases should be based on how well he is doing his job.

I agree with him

So if there has been a salary increase to any officer of cygx I want to know about it

Was it a 10 percent increase or was it a 1000 percent increase or zero As a shareholder I would be stupid to ignore something like a major salary increase to any officer of cygx.

I want to know, in any company I invest in what is the officers salary and what stock or any other compensation they are recieving.

gdepc

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2878125

Your concerns are also very valid. As far as I know, there are no former members of management involved in our quest to stop this Reverse Robin Hood Scheme. I can't say that with absolute certainty because email lends itself to both mis and dis information. A large percent of the responses have come from folks that have been around for years ... some back to almost the beginning.

If anyone has information that is contrary to my beliefs, please advise of such at the "cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net" address. It will be looked into immediately.

Many of the comments are well thought out. I have not seem even one response that would appear to be aimed a hurting the corporation in any way. Almost without exception, there have not been comments aimed at any particular personality, although there have been a few that have criticized the composition of the board of directors.

Although the potential is always present for an escalation into a scenario that could have more far reaching ramifications than anticipated, that is certainly not the intent.

If anyone has a point of view that would justify this massive dilution of shareholders equity, they should post such and offer justification of their views and those who share opposing views should debate the merits instead of resorting to personal attacks.

Arnold, if your figures are close to correct, how would the issuance of an additional 18,000,000 shares effect the ability of the board to bypass shareholders wishes?

Would those 18MM shares give total control of the corporation to the BOD and Beneficial Owners?

Are we being presented with the old Bullmoose scenario ... "what is good for General Motors is good for America"?

I hope everyone will just sit on their proxies until we can sort thru this fiasco.

And the amazing aspect of that spectacular rise is that it was done with no volume .... LOLOL ... check the histories on the prices and correct me if I am wrong, but the price seems to change with no volume .... hmmmmmm ... makes about as much sense as the Euro .... rofl@myself

Further research is underway to determine how the constitution and by-laws are worded in reqards to passing propositions. Judging from the initial response over a holiday weekend, it is obvious that there are a lot of "unhappy campers" with the proposals.

Everyone who is not in favor of this giveaway is being asked to voice their opinions by dropping an email to:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Shareholders who receive their notifications and proxies are being asked to not return them until we know the best strategy to defeat this Reverse Robin Hood Scheme.

Like most here, I do not know what to do with the several proxies that I receive, if they are actually sent out.

We should know in a couple of days what the actual requirements are for passing a proposal ... what percentage of the shareholders have to vote for it ... how many shares must be voted for a vote to be legitimate ... can a proposal be passed with less than a majority of the shareholders voting in favor as long as a majority of the shareholder vote ... etc, etc, etc.

Would those of you who post on other boards also let them know what is going on and ask them to respond to the cygxproxy address. Same with friends, family and others who are shareholders.

There have been several dozen shareholders who have indicated that they are opposed to the proposals to in effect transfer almost 15% of their equity in the corporation from people who spent their money to obtain shares and give it to a select few in management who have already become multimillionaires without bringing a single product to market.

Legal counsel told us this afternoon that the best way to defeat this Reverse Robin Hood Deal may be to simply insure that there are not enough proxies in favor of the beneficiaries of the scheme. To defeat the deal a majority of the shareholders simply have to do nothing ... ie, not return their proxies to CYGX. That will prevent a quorum from being obtained.

That strategy may be better and easier to bring about than voting against the proposals. If you are in this group, we would appreciate hearing from you:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Let's remind everyone again that if they oppose this share give-away management is proposing for themsevles, there is a potential proxy fight brewing.

If you oppose this please just send your name, number of shares voting to:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Also it will be helpful if you will include your posting alias and contact info, although they are not necessary.

A lot of us have expressed dissatisfaction over this plan that would in effect take away about 15% of our investment and turn it over to a very select few in management.

We need to hear from you as soon as practical so we will know if the movement against this proposal is sufficient to block it.

You are darned right Scooby, if they announce something that is spectacular and documentable and signed, sealed and delivered, I'll be right there to enjoy the fried crow ... if ... IF ... IF

You seem to be trying to spin dissent into dislike or even worse, you seem to imply that those of us who are upset over the newest share giveaway don't want them to succeed. The absolute opposite is the case. WE WANT THEM TO SUCCEED BEYOND EVEN YOUR WILDEST DREAMS.

Yes, if they announce the greatest thing ever I'll probably change my vote ... but it will have to be something that is COMPLETELY DONE ... not something that includes such words as IF, MAYBE, POTENTIALLY, etc.

We're just saying, first show us the results and then we'll discuss the rewards ... what is it about that simple concept that is evading your comprehension?

I received the emails from both you and Schrod ... thanks ... just for the record, it will help if you include your posting alias when sending the other info ... it is certainly not necessary but will help this old geezer avoid some confusion ...LOLOL

OT: yeah for Danica ... great race on a great day as we remember our friends, families and buddies that didn't make it ... God bless all of them amd their friends and families that still pay the price of their service everyday.

Somehow I just have serious problems with those who would detract from their sacrifices and their accomplishments and the freedoms they bought for us. The same disdain extends to those who would demand rights for themselves and respect for their beliefs when they adamantly deny to extend those same rights to others with whom they disagree. Simmel et simmul.

The email address for discussion concerning proxies is:

cygxproxy@sbcglobal.net

Please drop an email explaining your stand on the issues at the upcoming shareholders meeting. I don't know for sure what info is needed, but I imagine that it will include:

Name that stock is held in:
Number of Shares Voting:
email and other contact info:

I'll take the precautions I am capable of to protect the confidentiality of my fellow shareholders but am not a genius at this internet business. This info will only be shared with the people putting the formal proxy fight together.

Please contact other shareholders who are not regulars on this board and ask them to also respond. As I understand it, we will be required to have some percentage of the shareholders of record in order to get access to the shareholder list and be able to contect them.

I think this is a very important matter or I would not be lending my time, energy and effort to it. Maybe if we have a strong initial showing, those propositions will be withdrawn.