Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think DD is useful how many companys are out there , what is the real financial splits, IHSN to HM3 ??
IHSN + HM3 welcome to pinky land, risks are real & can be rewarded or taken FAST.
Kind of like if you don’t like heat/fire, Don’t be a fireman.
We are still waiting for the filing/detail (IHSN /HM3) merger , do we really know who owns what & how many, plus how many are restricted ? Winters did not get HM3 free, & Harrington did not sell it for nothing.
JP I have followed this board a long time & appreciate the DD & support you have done but its time for the company to clear up a few things up , not hear-say from a phone conversations. Don’t tell me to call or I will need to look up the post from you about how Chris gets so many calls & e-mails that he sends the messages back thru you.
Back on March 31 2010 (the last financial statement ) filed May 14th the
Shares issued , Balance, March 31, 2010 1,420,604,598
There is a claim Chris winters is a investment banker so he has to know what plan of action he has, Tim Harrington seems to be fairly smart, so I am sure he has a contract or deal, plus Chris, investment buddy of 15 years is guiding him and Tim Harrington has Karl Rodriguez who has served as President of hm3 since its inception. Karl is a graduate of LSU Law School and became a member of the Louisiana State Bar Association. He does not practice law in the state of Florida but supervises legal matters for the Company. His law practice was primarily focused on corporate matters for private and public corporations, for which he practiced before the Securities and Exchange Commission.
http://www.hmcubed.com/about-u/bios.html
with all that type of help, they should have been able to clear up all of the Fillings issues (or do they want to ) do they want to stay risky limited or start the process of a transparent company ?
acquired HM3 April 2010 this is September 2010 (6months later) .
plus least we forget :
Chris Winter, President and COB
30798 US Highway 19 North 1,192,601,000,,,, 90.3% common shares owned
Palm Harbor, FL 34684 common shares
http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=30532
are they restricted show me the filling, just put up the link & I will apologize. (no phone calls please ).
YO I am in for 500k , I too am looking to make a buck or two That’s why I am here , Forbes is why I stayed,
Chris just needs to put out a few updates there is no reason this is not @ .02-.03 post by-out rumor.
That’s was the price pre-buy-out rumor.
Now he has HM3, Forbes, A new product in production, two products on the way,
This thing should be @ .10 + just with that and a few shareholder updates JMO
GLTA .
Depends on what side of the wall you are standing on,
IE: democrats vs republicans
what does it matter, it still confirms the project.
plus try this link
it shows where the mongolian's are on the project, see line 52
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&tl=en&u=http://fgw.xam.gov.cn/document/20100722151211812356.xls&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhiSNBIlfW_egdwM1ogvMeyUVXAIYg
ThomCa-ching
The facts are simple, the CEO paid for advertisement into a magazine as an article.[color=red][/color]
First do you have proof from Doug or the Company paid for the articles,(Supply Link) please, second if they did CONGRATS they were to have signed major contracts then (no it did not happen)
How SMART is for the CEO promoting his company in MAJOR publications ,
The CEO has not at all discussed why a deal, suppose to be inked 4 months ago, is delayed. [color=red][/color]
What would you want the the PR to say we are currently still in negotiations with a foreign country with strong traditions and they just wont sign, I will be flying over with the soprano boys to get this taken care of.
They just gave a update & your calling it FLUFF, scam cant win. And it’s from a vice governor of the country giving a update.
Look at the PR on patent updates that’s fluff THEN a week later you guys a SLAMING the patent & its going to expire, yea in 2019 Then the lawyers get to fight.
The price per share a few months ago was $1.00 and fell to $0.04[color=red][/color]
The restricted shares hit the market, planed/ unplanned drove the price BOTH WAYS
Then the BASHERS took over, using transparent risk factors from the 10k with out posting the other side.
here one that we all love
a stock you guys pump
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Disclosures required under this item are not applicable, as the Company has elected to follow the reduced disclosure requirements as a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act[color=red][/color]
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7216862
Asegal1228
Don’t you think all the weak hands have sold @ a loss by now ?
(that’s why you’re here isn’t it) . flippes are on the sidelines watching aren’t you ?
Shortie’s well depends on the run / Risk they will tolerate, you know the excitement of the pinks…..
On the patent see below they have 10-12 years at least (litigation may EXPAND IT)
Patent #: 6447559
Issue Dt: 09/10/2002 Application #: 09704738 Filing Dt: 11/03/2000
the United States, under current patent law, for patents filed on or after June 8, 1995, the term of the patent is 20 years from the earliest claimed filing date. For patents filed prior to June 8, 1995, the term of patent is either 20 years from the earliest claimed filing date or 17 years from the issue date, whichever is longer. Extensions may also be had for various administrative delays. (The exact date of termination may be zealously litigated, especially where daily profits from a patent amount to millions of dollars)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_of_patent
see their post from 6-24 #22767 or post #23003 from 6-28 what changed so much that he had paninc?
Humblehawk,
Can you list the Plants & Companies you feel are currently running superior technology.
I would like to do my DD on them , to compare, look @ there 10’K as you elegantly tell us all the time it’s in the 10k just read it. They may be companies I need to invest in.
Thanks in advance
Blaine222
I would hope they believe in the technology, thats what they are selling, I also believe there was a litle company back in the 60'selling technology, you most likly will use it to respond, remember it? Microsoft,
but dont jump yet I am not sugesting there are microsoft, just early stage.time will tell the extent of.
all upcoming companys start somewhere with financing challanges, do you think Benham/SAIC will let 5% of gross go out the door on a FIRST PROJECT projected @ 350 Mil a year, and all other projects TLA's for the next 15 years. think not.
and the us goverment with China trade deficit implications.
JMO
in that same 10K
Filed 03/29/10 for the Period Ending 12/31/09
Under the terms of our consulting agreement with Benham, we are obligated to pay to Benham a fee
representing five percent of all gross revenues received by us from the sale of our technology, the operation of
franchised plants utilizing the technology or revenue received on any other basis that is related to the technology.
This fee will remain in effect for a period of 15 years, commencing from the date that we receive our initial revenue
stream from the Chinese operations. All intellectual property rights associated with new art developed by Benham
remain the property of CCTI, however Benham would have a “right to use” the intellectual property provided they
are deployed in non-competitive projects.
At this filing date, we do not have firm commitments for funding but intend to seek sufficient debt or
equity funding to meet both our capital contribution deadlines and funding sufficient for our operations. We are
actively pursuing technology license and royalty agreements in order to begin construction of other facilities without
incurring the capital costs associated with the construction of future plants. Our engineering consultant, Benham
Companies, LLC (“Benham) has tentatively estimated construction costs for each one million short ton coal
cleaning facility of approximately $150 million (excluding land costs). We are in discussions with several interested
parties who may fund some or all of the estimated costs but have no definitive agreements in place.
Blaine222,
Once again I will agree, there are RISK FACTORS .
All transparent companies post RISK factors in there 10K , that is exactly what you are posting
I will use the SAME 10K with a link so all can look @ BOTH SIDES
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/DisplayFiling.aspx?TabIndex=2&FilingID=7152272&companyid=795864&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d1445109
Lets not forget this is a up and coming company, & Doug definitely could have handled PR’S differently.
Add that with they way of early financing done, WALLA, here we are on the eve of Creation/Destruction.
Yes there is risk , it just matters how much each of us as investors can tolerate,
BUT lets not leave out the other Side of the 10K
Overview
Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (“We,” “Company” or “Clean Coal”) owns a patented technology that we believe will provide clean energy at low costs through the use of the world’s most abundant fossil fuel, coal. Our technology is designed to utilize controlled heat to extract and capture pollutants and moisture from low-rank coal, transforming it into a clean-burning, more energy-efficient fuel, prior to combustion. Our proprietary coal cleaning process is designed to ensure that the carbon in coal maintains its structural integrity during the heating process while the volatile matter (polluting material) within the coal turns into a gaseous state and is removed from the coal. We have trade-marked the name “PRISTINE” as a means of differentiating our processed product from the negative connotations generally associated with coal, and its traditional use. PRISTINE™ is applicable for a variety of applications, including coal-fired power stations, chemical byproduct extraction, and as a source fuel for coal to liquid (CTL) technologies.
To complement our core technology, we previously entered into a Technology Option Agreement to evaluate a carbon dioxide (CO2) separation technology as an alternative approach to “carbon capture and sequestration.” Our original Technology Option Agreement which expired on May 27, 2009 was extended until December 31, 2009, and is currently under review with the expectation that the agreement will be further extended. Subject to a satisfactory outcome of our evaluation, it is the intention of both companies to enter into a global licensing agreement for the CO2 technology to be marketed in conjunction with our core technology. Separately, the Company had intended to explore an association with another technology development company to evaluate their fuel-to-liquid technology as a precursor to a potential joint marketing agreement, however, these discussions were not fruitful and were subsequently abandoned.
1
Technology
Our coal treating process extracts the volatile matter (solidified gases or pollutant material) from standard low-rank coal by heating coal as it transitions through several disparate heat chambers, causing the volatile matter to turn to gas and escape the coal, leaving behind a clean-burning fuel source. Historically, the primary technological challenge of extracting this volatile matter has been maintaining the structural and chemical integrity of the carbon, while achieving enough heat to turn the volatile matter into a gaseous state. Heating coal to temperatures well in excess of 400º Fahrenheit is necessary to quickly turn volatile matter gaseous. However, heating coal to these temperatures has generally caused the carbon in the coal to disintegrate into an unusable fine powder (coal dusting). Our patented flow process transitions the coal through several atmospherically independent heat chambers controlled at increasingly higher temperatures. These heat chambers are infused with inert gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), preventing the carbon from combusting. We have identified the optimum combination of atmospheres, levels of inert gases, transport speed, and temperatures necessary to quickly extract and capture volatile matter, while maintaining the structural and chemical integrity of the coal. Using our technology, we are able to capture the volatile gases that escape the coal, and to utilize some of these gases to fuel the process, while others are captured to potentially provide an ancillary revenue stream. Depending on the characteristics of the coal being cleaned, the flow processing time is expected to be in the range of 12 to 18 minutes.
As part of the process to commercialize our technology, on December 31, 2007, we entered into an agreement with our engineering consultant, Benham Companies, LLC (“Benham”), a subsidiary of Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”). The contract provides for the engineering design, procurement and construction of our initial plant in China, the U.S.A., and other countries. Benham’s design provides for the deployment of standard operational modules, each with annual capacity of 166,000 metric tons, providing the flexibility to be configured in accordance with customers’ individual production capacity requirements. Benham’s work suggests that our coal cleaning process may be energy self-sufficient, relying upon captured methane and other byproducts to fuel the coal cleaning process.
Our technology has been tested and proven under laboratory and pilot scale conditions, and the results have been studied by Benham, SAIC and certain joint venture candidates. Testing has shown no evidence of coal dusting or other technical concerns that might hinder commercialization.
We believe that our technology has three distinct primary applications: the cleaning of coal for direct use as fuel, the extraction of potentially valuable chemical by-products for commercial sale, and the use of processed coal as a feed stock for gasification and liquefaction (CTL) projects. While we believe each application offers vast potential for commercialization, our market entry strategy is focused on what we believe is our most immediate opportunity, the production of clean coal.
Business Activities and Strategy
The principal element of our early business strategy was to partner with local utilities, power producers or mine owners to build, own and operate the initial facility utilizing our technology. With the signing of a contract with the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region, we modified our strategy to one of establishing a Cooperative Joint Venture (CJV), in conjunction with a production contract to provide clean coal (PRISTINE™) as a fuel source for liquefaction. We have subsequently revised our business model whereby we will license our technology to third parties and exact a license fee, as well as a royalty fee, based on plant production. In December, 2009, the Company announced the signing of its first Technology Licensing Agreement for India, and are currently pursuing similar initiatives in the U.S.A. and Asia.
We also intend to co-locate our facilities with both new and existing coal-burning power plants. The proposed footprint of the facilities is expected to be 15 to 20 acres for small capacity plants, including land for storage of treated or clean coal. We believe that the majority of the plant components are commercially available, and the only significant custom components are related to our proprietary thermal chambers. This greatly reduces the risks that would be associated with the incorporation of new technologies, or unproven components.
As a prelude towards the eventual signing of a joint venture agreement and the construction and operation of an initial facility, on April 23, 2008, we signed an interim MOU with the Xing’an League Administrative Office of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, PRC to explore business opportunities in the Inner Mongolia region of China, subsequently amended on June 11, 2008, when we signed an MOU with Sino-Mongolia International Railroad Systems, Co. Ltd. of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, PRC (SMIRSC). On December 2, 2008, we entered into a cooperative joint venture agreement with the SMIRSC. This agreement replaced and superseded the
2
previous MOUs. The joint venture agreement provides for the deployment of our technology into Inner Mongolia to form the foundation for a coal-to-fuel project that will scale to 80 million short tons per year. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we will provide the technology to enhance low-grade coal that will be used as a fuel source for a coal liquefaction facility in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, PRC. The joint venture company will build an initial plant with an annual capacity of 1.5 million short tons to supply clean coal for a newly constructed power station. The initial plant is projected to employ 10 of the 166,000 short ton operating modules, with an allowance for redundancy. Thereafter production is estimated to be increased, over an estimated 10 year period, to a total capacity of 80 million short tons annually, the majority of which will be used as feed stock for coal-to-liquid production.
Blaine222
I certainly agree that it’s an unproven process on a commercial scale.
That’s The purpose of getting this first deal on line,
as far as cost, the process by design is to raise the BTU of low grade lignite, resulting in less fuel used to achieve the same results (lower operating cost ) plus reusable by-products to sell for profit or help offset operating cost.
sell low rank 12-14 buck ton coal,,,, now for 35-40 buck ton PRISTINE high rank coal .
not a bad investment ya think.
Plus I am glad to see that you agree Doug does have a contract, its just on the slow boat.
I think part of the problem is
the slow boat from China.
Skipper&Gilligan what do you think
Before you all blow this up,
See this original filling , 10-12G Jan 14, 2009
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6619145
Directors Edward Jennings and Stewart Ashton are deemed to be independent as that term is defined by the SEC. Director Jay Lasner has acted as a business consultant in addition to his services as a director and may not be considered to be independent. Mitchell Shapiro served as our CEO and President from September 2007 to December 2007, and is therefore not considered to be independent. Douglas Hague, our CEO and President, is not independent.
I have no idea why the MODS let some posters contiue to post such rumor.
I can not believe this past weekend, two posters posted well over
100 post.
from midnight friday till 6:pm sunday there were approx 450 posts
100 of those deleted because you guys use names & words in your post back to them, (they win) they report you,
so not bad for them, 23% deleted,
24% one posters (post), then if you add the alternate egos of him/them who knows,
I trully expect this will be deleted also,
Blaine,
After the 10k was completed, there was a simulated test on Pristine® coal you might find interesting.
It can be found on the CCTI web page under
Scientific Process - From Experimentation to Implementation
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42
I am currently tring to find a neutral site to confirm.
while searching I found this presentation you may find of interest.
http://fossil.energy.gov/international/Publications/September_2009_CWG/Waste_Coal_Utilization_in_India.pdf
The more I research the stronger this gets.
I would not believe if I had not been following the board this evening,
Chearleaders turning to Bashers ,
Bashers turning to cheerleaders
now if we can all get Doug on the team,and closethe sale
we will soar.
Congrats Lakers on your championship.
go night its real late in the east.
JBBROCKY
You said it best
have a great evening
GO CCTC,
Thanks,
great DD , just like all the info you have posted.
fence sitters all of you have to trust the consultants/partners,& the DD each of you have done on this . Yes I know dates have come & gone but what project in this size happens like clock work?
I am like you am here till the end & I think it will be great!
just a car guy @ heart
38 ford street rod
Just remember @ 12:01 pm Eastern Time it will be the 18th in Benjing China.
Maybe Doug changes things & releases afternoon PR to make us all happy
just dreaming / hoping for some type of comunication.
GLA
BIO aggreed,
everyone just needs to settle down & have fatih on why they invested, too much is put on specific dates, what we dont need once again is a major sell off,Panic sells, I am in this deep & for the long haul.
I will say this again they are a start up trying to close a multi million/billion project. with some prety good partners. SAIC/Benham, DoC & a goverment that is tempermental at best.
it's thier play ground (China) so they set the rules.
JMO , GLTA
I dont mean to differ, but per this news release,
CORAL SPRINGS, FL--(Marketwire - May 26, 2010) - Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: CCTC) announced today that it has received formal notification that as part of the final project approval process, the Provincial Government has formerly advised that CCTI has met all the criteria established for the approval of its project and that the formal approval documents would be issued by mid-June 2010.
just need to know what mid June is,
The reference Chinese documents will be available on the Company's website later today, as will the final documents once issued
Link from pr on web page
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/rel_us_print.jsp?id=1266567
Certainly glad this is the end of the week :
I am going to start calling this board CRAZY FRIDAYS, a few of you need to hit a couple of shots of something. Some others need to put on a crash helmet. I think you have run into the anxious wall head on. ONE to many times.
There has been a ton of DD done on this company some came back clean, some we all have questions on. But do you really think the government, is part of this, do you not think the Chinese doc is real by now. Don’t you think someone big would call them on it. Remember (SAIC/Benham is involved in this deal) Read the world news the Chinese want to claim credit for all new tech in thier country. & they have already started building different types of plants in Hohhot. (see china daily Hohhot energy)
Have faith in your judgment of this investment if not it may be time to foldm. Don’t let the bashers start a crazy frenzy and have a sell off, they win.
BBB thanks for the info you can pass on but sometimes its easier to just say nothing new to report but I feel great about my investment here.
Stevesc sorry your not going to the toad oops Ford Nationals,
My ride 38 ford 5.0, yes a Ford in a Ford.
risk (r sk)
The variability of returns from an investment
spec•u•la•tion (sp k y -l sh n)
Engagement in risky business transactions on the chance of quick(here we need to wait) or considerable profit
of course this is jmo.
JB61
Thanks for the work you do for us, I have just been notified you are out of the Dog House I stuck my name & this boards name out for you we will be also policing you.
keep up the great work stay clean, and say thanks IHUB
let me know if the e-address you posted in a early post is still good (I saved it) I will send you a copy of my appeal letter.
remember Monday is about those who gave thier all & those who are currently serving
a Proud father of a active duty military person.
Try this,
Curt Cultice
Marketing & Communications
phone 202-482-2253
fax 202-482-5362
curt.cultice@mail.doc.gov
it is from
www.trade.gov/cs/cs_pressroom.asp
It's because
Doug Invited all Pumpers & Bashers down for a boat trip in the gulf. want's everyone to see all the DIRTY OIL& then show them all the signed MOU's. you didn't get an invite ? you must be long. JMO
have a great weekend
I did also but I am Wrong.
if you look also under INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS
you will find this
•The Company entered into a landmark Joint Venture contract to build a plant in China with an initial, annual capacity of 1.5 million short tons in a new industrial park. The Chinese government is funding the multi-billion dollar JV in order to turn China’s abundant low grade coal resources into petroleum products. The plant will be expanded to provide a final capacity of 80.0 million short tons per annum. The plant will supply coal with 90% of the pollutants pre-removed for use in power stations and to manufacture fuel and lubricants.
•In addition to China, CCTI is exploring similar opportunities in Inner Mongolia, India, Malaysia, and the US.
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2&Itemid=3
Yes they were all there,
the web site is the same as before it went down.
With the heavy bashing this company has been taking, I will add to the conspiracy theory. it was attacked, the security & bandwith would not handle it. who knows who cares.
It has no bearing on what is going on with the pps.
This company has some strong Strategic Partners and has had them.
Just like Procyon its more about Dr Sarathy (birth place India)
40 years Carbon Experiance,go to the web page and read.
http://www.sarvaa.com/offlinesites/procyon/assignments.asp Acheivements
Besides these experiences i have developed many coconut shell based carbon molecular sieve carbons for separating oxygen and nitrogen from air. The carbon molecular sieve based separation units are going to be a strong growing market for the future. For example these units will replace the current practice of pulp bleaching using chlorine. The chlorine bleaching produces dioxin, which is a powerful carcinogen.
Recently i have designed a charcoal production unit that is totally environmentally friendly with complete heat recovery & super heated steam production capability. I will recommend this unit for the mozambique plant. (Methanol power)
He is also involved with Kavia carbons on indiamart . I thought the china webs sites were bad.
http://www.indiamart.com/company/1552278/
Research & Development At Kavia Carbons research and development is a primary focus. KCCPL understands that on-going development is imperative to meet the changing needs of the consumer. To accomplish this focus, KCCPL has invested in a fully equipped research facility and in scientific talent. Our research team is led by Dr. Sarathy who has 40 years of experience in the activated carbon industry. His expertise lies in activation processes (steam and chemical), extrusion, impregnated carbons, gas mask carbons (both civilian and military grades), carbo-gel and super-activated carbons. KCCPL''''s new research facility comprises of 2400 sq. ft. and is equipped with an oblicone blender/impregnator, laboratory rotary furnace (temperature programmable), multi-tray temperature programmable tray dryer, Zigma-blade blender, lab scale extruder with various kind of dyes. It also equipped for ASTM, AWWA and Japanese standard test methods. At KCCPL we know that the needs of each customer are different. In order to cater to your unique requirements, the R&D team can customize a product specifically for your industry and application. As a result, you will be assured that KCCPL will deliver innovative, cost effective and value added products.
Now if i could just figure out the Randall thing.
sleep well and quit PANICING.
sorry for the long post
I agree with all this.
However you have to admit there are some strange happenings on the consulting deals.
(Nancy Randall) address listed on Whois for web site is a home for sale(short at that) in Naples FL, tax record name is not Randall.
the 3 mil for(procyon) consulting well we really cant identify who that is
just like the say pinks are not for the faint.
GLA
Take a deep breath , let it out , relax,
What does it really matter if it is a advertisement, advertorial or article, did any of you look at the demographics of Fortune ?
.
All company’s self promote for business. think I read somewhere they were going after more business in the US.(Randall promoting the company).For the 120k its costing to reach this type of decision maker base its cheep. One 5 year agreement can make this thing explode.
McGovern Capital reps the fortune printer. Relationships build company’s.
also if you look @ the Fortune calender (see link) you will see they start releasing articles online May4/5 http://www.fortunemediakit.com/calendar.html
on the negative the company may be releasing marginal/miss leading PR, time will tell.
look I am here to make profits if they need to release whatever positive type articles I am in.
GLTA
0.60-0.70 with confirmation of India revenue & China JV , then it can grow from there.positive news,revenue,etc.
Hold or Fold; only you can make the call. After following this & other boards it is amazing all the different views you portray when sometimes patience is the key, we are all here for one reason to make money Long, Short, flippers. Reminder alert this is a speculative stock with new technology. One thing is clear there is a lot of attention being given to a penny stock with average daily trades around 2.5 mil, some to do with pr’s & timing, some thru boards like this one, some thru the penny pushers from the web , one thing is certain this company seems to be doing the correct things filing reports, keeping investors updated for the most part (some maybe a little more to up to date or they brag/fantasize they may have info that is not published ) plus they have a processes that will help reduce pollutions. What it needs now are customers to prove it. The types of customers they are trying to reel in sometimes just do not cooperate with the timing of the world.
My hunch is the BW article/Advertorial was timed to give this stock momentum for a signing and it did not come to fruit, now we have the upcoming Fortune article early May, plus 1st Qtr earning release? , maybe some added income from a missed PR opportunity from India income (if there was some ) and the news release of a China deal & other deals forth coming, or could just be a fantasy. Any way just got to be confident to know when to hold & when to fold, for now I choosing to hold.
GLTA in what ever you venture is.