Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
INO ... sold some yesterday at 2.94, bought back this AM at 2.46, closed at 2.60 ... hopefully this continues to work out ...
So you are no longer claiming 50 cents was the proper valuation?
Then there is no burden of proof.
Where is your link proving, a few weeks ago at a measly 50 cents, that INO was not undervalued back then?
Let's see your magic formula!
lol.
I sold a few shares after-hours @ 2.94 ... that was a crazy run! Considering no news has been released we certainly could have a big pull back tomorrow.
INO OMG!! My 'average down' shares are a 5-bagger ... on average approaching a quadruple!
LLEN - dual-listing Taiwan...
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=58678804&symbol=LLEN
L&L on Track for Taiwan TDR Issuance
L&L Energy, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:LLEN)
SEATTLE, Aug. 5, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- L & L Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: "LLEN") ("L&L" or the "Company"), a U.S.-based company with profitable energy (coal) operations in China, announced today that its Taiwan Depository Receipt issuance ("TDR") is moving forward on schedule. The TDR is to provide capital for L&L's growth, and in management's view, will be accretive to shareholders.
Last week, L&L held a joint kick-off meeting in Taiwan to discuss strategy and ensure a coordinated TDR effort among its underwriter, Taishin Securities ("Taishin"), its auditor, KPMG (Taiwan), and its legal advisor, Chieh Yeh Law Firm, a prestigious Taiwan firm. Following the kick off meeting, Taishin has begun analyzing the Company's energy market and customer portfolios, while KPMG is conducting its final independent review of the Company's audited financial statements ended April 30, 2013. KPMG has issued its unqualified opinions and endorsed L&L's 2012 and 2011 financial statements. The current timetable calls for clearing a prospectus and completing the TDR placement by the end of calendar 2013.
L&L Chairman and CEO Dickson Lee commented, "I am pleased with the TDR progress. As part of our due diligence Taishin brought to our attention that companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange generally issue cash dividends each year. If L&L adopts Taishin's advice to issue an annual cash dividend, we are optimistic that the TDR could benefit all US shareholders. We will consider Taishin's advice as we move this project
XIN - dividend continues...
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=58681491&symbol=XIN
I had to reinstall the Scottrade the app on my new phone ... yes, the new interface much worse.
The worst part is that during market hours, there is no refresh button (at least that I can find) so I have to toggle the disconnect button ... but that only refreshes the value of the portfolio and not individual stocks!
The mobile version of the webpage is even less functional as stocks take mulitple rows and thereby don't fit on one screen.
My plan is to just go to the normal webpage but I haven't had time to figure out how bypass the mobile webpage.
In such few words, great summary of the risks, rewards, and recent developments!
Great summary of both the risks and rewards!
Why would their movies sell at Walmart but not online?
So you don't have ANY big issues about VODWIZ itself? Even though you feel VERY pessimistic about it?
That's actually re-assuring!
Although shareprice is separate topic, I'm not convinced about the 'friends and family' effect. If shareprice was driven by insiders, then -- by your logic -- the shareprice should have been much higher for the last years just due to the many shares owned by Eric and Fred.
I'm curious ... since you seem extremely pessismistic that VODWIZ could be of any value whatsoever, what would you say is the one specific thing that concerns you most?
Great to close the week above the $2.00 threshold!
Thanks! Please credit also moviesam for indentifying those revenues!
Then HHSE would collect some form of royalty? (either upfront or per view?)
I'm loaded up!!! Two huge potential upcomging catalysts ... need only one and (IMO) we have lift-off:
1. Audit.
2. Expand Vodwiz into the main channels (especially with partner vidoes).
What do you think is the potential for buyers once VODWIZ is implemented?
The benefit might be twofold ... folks already aware of HHSE might be attracted to the profits and some might learn of the company through VODWIZ.
I'm curious your overall assessment of VODWIZ to add shareholder value ... both positive and negative factors.
Is bonz the next 50 bagger I better not miss?? Not looked into it yet!
It's been a nice change!
Let me get this straight...?
1. You said earlier that NTEK/HHSE better "hurry" because 4K streaming has been sucessfully tested in Japan.
2. And now you say that NETFLIX need not worry as it's impossible to stream 4K.
Can you explain the inconsistency?
Thanks dietr ... love that idea!
If we wanted to go crazy, we could put the actual links!
Excelsior closes financing... I've not seen royalty financing in any of my stocks but I think it bodes very well as the financier is betting on revenues.
It is now feasible that the feasibility study will be completed. Perhaps I'll still recover my losses or better!
https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=108822
Excelsior Closes Financing with Callinan Royalties Corporation
August 1, 2013
(TSX-V: MIN) (Frankfurt: 3XS) (OTCQX: EXMGF)
Excelsior Mining Corp. (TSX-V: MIN) (Frankfurt: 3XS) (OTCQX: EXMGF) ("Excelsior" or the
“Company”) is pleased to announce that it has closed its previously announced Share Purchase and
Royalty Option Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Callinan Royalties Corporation (“Callinan”).
Excelsior has raised gross proceeds of $1.0 million through the issuance of 6,250,000 common
shares at a price of $0.16 per common share. Concurrently, Excelsior has raised $2.0 million through
the sale of a 0.5% gross revenue royalty (“GRR”) on the Gunnison Project.Callinan now retains the option to invest up to an additional $19.0 million into Excelsior in exchange
for a further 2.5% GRR on the Gunnison Project based on development milestones (1.5%) and a
construction option (1%).
For the details of this transaction, please refer to news release dated July 23, 2013
(http://www.excelsiormining.com/index.php/news/news-2013).
Proceeds from the transaction will be used by the Company for general and working capital purposes
to advance the Gunnison Project.
Commenting on the close of the transaction, President and CEO, Stephen Twyerould stated, “We are
pleased to have concluded this arrangement with Callinan Royalties, which allows for the
advancement of the Gunnison In-situ Copper Project. Our immediate focus will be to use this
investment to finish the pre-feasibility study. We anticipate the completion of this key milestone before
the end of the year.”
The common shares issued to Callinan are subject to a statutory four month hold period expiring on
December 1, 2013.
It is not my place to say whether or not Movie sam is biased.
This, i think, summarizes his thoughts as a non-shareholder ... (please Moviesam correct if I'm wrong about any of these specific items).
- Doesn't like the CEO.
- Doesn't believe any potential developments mentioned by the CEO.
- When the CEO has an accomplishment, does not believe it will create any value.
- Doesn't like NTEK as a business partner.
- Doesn't like it when the share price goes up.
- Doesn't like it when the share price goes down.
- Doesn't like any of HHSE film library.
- Doesn't like the VODWIZ business model of streaming movies with no upfront costs.
- Doesn't like the potential of 4K early adopters.
- Doesn't like the HHSE book business.
- Doesn't like books about the lives of cultural icons.
- Doesn't appreciate the hard work that was put into adapting Toys in the Attic.
- Doesn't like the potential of college football preview DVDs and SEC partnership.
- Doesn't value the minimal dilution.
- Doesn't believe the TCA loan signfies any accomplishment or potential.
- Doen't think placement of item's at Walmart and Redbox, has value.
- Never mentions the market cap.
Of course, I'll admit some negatives that the audit has taken too long, TWELVE created a big hole and I'm not a big fan of 'All's Faire in Love'. These all can evaluated more deeply. However it is odd to consider ALL of these items negatively.
LLEN - bought some shares today.
Yes, it's Chinese operations, but it's also headquartered in the good ole USA ...
Hi All - bought some shares today... 2.85 looks like a good entry!
Love these dips following good news ... !
XRA rocketing?!
My cost average was .65 which I rode up to 2.13 BUT you've only been holding for a week ... me more like a year or more!!
Excellent trade and congrats!
That we can get along so well even when we disagree reflects genuine respect and friendship ... it's also how we learn.
That's more than enough touchy-feely for me today! I'm signing-off ... thanks for the discussion.
Even facts can be pumping/bashing if very one-sided ... when excited about an investment, to some degree, I think this is difficult to completely avoid. In that case, please don't hesitate to call me out ... it's for my own benefit!
Except for the occasional misunderstanding, however, there should be zero tolerance for anything counter-factual.
INO - wow, looks like I sold near the top ... wish I sold more as this drop is fierce!!
Only down 8% for the day, but about a 25% swing in less than an hour!
Housepainter - are you still around and watching this?
GCC - a commodity index EFT ... a nice way to diversify against stocks and bonds in general (the latter looking scary in terms of potential increasing yields.) Looks like a bottom and would benefit from inflation (which seems inevitable from all the monetary stimulous). Also, China's growth and demand is slowing but demand nontheless is growing.
The 0.92% expense ratio is a bit lofty, but perhaps not too bad for something specialized as this...
I'm still thinking/comparing of UURAF and GWM ... one does not have proven metallurgy tests (to my knowledge) whereas the other has great political instability.
I'm totally with you on the tremendous potential ... if/when I get the time, I need to take a more detailed look.
Agree 100% ...
Sold 20% of my shares @2.13 earlier today ... my cost average was $0.65 so I HAD to lock in some gains.
Alhough I have a few less shares, the dollar amount of my holdings is significantly higher thus, from that perspective, I'm more commmitted now than ever ... good things are happening ... go INO!
If you ignore for the moment that the VODWIZ library is set to expand expoentially, many films in the HHSE library have won awards ... everyone has different taste so I think it is disengenous to say the movies are all crappy.
Also, keep in mind there is virtually no cost for HHSE to setup VODWIZ and the low marketcap ... we don't have to come close to competing with NETFLIX to be wildly successful here.
A niche of customers who might be attracted by discount pricing would be a great start ...
On top of this, don't forget the 4K early adopters!!!
INO - sold 20% of my shares @ $2.13 - I've been aggressively holding but it would be silly not to lock in some gains at this point...
Yes, I'm very aware the prevailing wisdom is its management issue and fully expect everyone to agree with you. Given many are upset with the(non)communication of CIN results, the reverse-split debacle, the compensation structure that was proposed, not fiding a partner, etc, it's quite easy to correlate all that with the share-price decline and get agreement.
This is a key point, however. If the share price decline is mostly because of lack of trust in mangagment, that might actually be the "LEAST-WORST" case scenerio. It might remain unlikely that management learns from their mistakes and take corrective action (to find a partner, uplist etc). However, if the share price is reflecting, for instance, that the science has been shown to be much more dubious than anticipated, that is much worse as there is less foundation to build long-term value.
If it is indeed mangement, then the question that follows for me is what did they destroy? ... That is also relevant. if a deep-pocket was to acquire ADXS tomorrow and fund the studies, etc did management make a decision to hinder the earnings potential? Which specific decision? What specifically needs to be turned around?
If the cause was managment and we have not identified how they have harmed the company in such a fundanental way, then there might still be potential value? I don't know the answer... but that is what I'm wondering.
Thank you for thinking about my questions.
Yes, I did not consider there may be a "spillover effect" (sort of). Meaning that if the treatment was not effective on the CIN trial, that the "immune mechanism" is unlikely effective elsewhere. For lack of a better analogy, if someone was terrible at throwing a football, its an indication they are not probably not great at shooting a basketball.
To some degree, all managemnet follies may actually be another symoton, not cause, of the results. In other words, if the CIN results were fantastic, everyone today might be praising management... who knows!