Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
General Rules in Volume Analysis
Volume- Decreasing
Price- Rising
Interpretation- Bearish
Volume- Increasing
Price- Rising
Interpretation- Bullish
Volume- Decreasing
Price- Falling
Interpretation- Bullish
Volume- Increasing
Price- Falling
Interpretation- Bearish
Price Down on Heavy Volume
http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/alerts/glossary.asp?TermID=25
This alert signals that a company's stock price has dropped by at least 5% on trading volume that is at least three times the average daily volume of the last 13 weeks.
Volume is the fuel of the market, since stock prices only move up or down when shares are trading hands. Most stocks trade hands at an even pace for days or weeks at a stretch until special events occur. Those events might be rather ordinary, such as an announcement of earnings, a new product or new executive. Or they might be extraordinary, such as a merger or a new corporate alliance.
Sometimes, however, trading volume spikes upward and the price trades down for no apparent reason. Very often it ultimately turns out that the reason was major selling of the stock by large institutions, hedge funds, mutual funds or private investors. The stealthy exit of strong players from a stock with enough trading power to boost volume by more than 200% and trim the price tends to be bearish for current investors. These major players are generally more knowledgeable and critical about their investments than individual investors -- and their exit at a particular price tends to set a resistance level, or ceiling, for the future trading of a stock.
By itself, however, a fall in price on big volume is not a reason to sell or avoid a stock. It is just a clue that the stock is likely to be under selling pressure -- sometimes also called "distribution" -- by major players. Occasionally stocks that fall fast when sold by price-momentum traders -- that is, investors who buy stocks simply because they are going up, trying to catch the trend -- can go up equally fast when better news hits.
To determine whether the stock is under distribution by a big investor, wait a few weeks and check Form 13-G SEC filings in Stock Research. Any owner of more than 5% of a stock must tell the government -- and, by extension, you -- of any changes in their holdings within 10 days. Also, check Company News to determine if the company has announced any bad news, such as a disappointing earnings report.
.0125 on the ask
and nothing is going on? A 3 month low for a shaking point, after great news? It continues to get lower and lower with no sustainable bounce. This is unreal. No way MM's could hold this down this long.
There's no other way to explain it, I agree, the company has too be dumping shares.
This is NOT being manipulated.
The support level at .015 has been tested a few times the past couple of days. We bounced right off it. Today it blew through the support and didn't bounce, it's still trading below that prior support level.
With buying pressure from all the good news, there is no way this could be manipulated for so long. Something is not right.
Company dumping stock?
I asked about this the other day. 725m OS and 1b AS, the company is dumping stock. When called the company said it wasn't them selling shares.
Wouldn't be the first time a pinky lied. What other explanation is there for this? .0142? With this good news? This is toast. I would love nothing more than to be wrong.
Share Structure
This is the best I could find
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42960301
That's the 2nd time today it bounced off .015. At least we know the support is solid. If we close over .02 (seems to be some major resistance at that level) we should move higher quickly.
Why don't you read it again. See the question marks? I'm asking a question. If you don't have the capacity to answer the question, don't reply.
Volume?
The previous high for one day is 9M shares. Right now we are sitting at 26M shares. Cause for concern? Dumping shares on open market?
I'm looking for info. on this "exclusive partnership" and keep hitting a brick wall. From what i've read all that can be surmised is that Mellow Hope handles all the international marketing and sales for just the vaccine.
Nothing has changed for HTDS. This deal has not changed their fortunes. The press release shows that Novartis is focusing on building the China market. They are not focusing on exporting the vaccine. Export is the only way HTDS makes money. Until we see proof of increased exports, this deal means nothing for HTDS. JMO
I'm not sure, but it could mean that Mellow Hope has just the one dedicated client. Or/And Mellow Hope is the only company that can market and sell the vaccine on the international market (so they say).
Increased exports is the only way HTDS will benefit from this deal. As far as a foreign made vaccine administered in this country.....I doubt it.
Any word from them yet?
They received a CRL back in 2006, requesting additional safety studies. If I remember correctly, it was this requested data that extended the review for 90 days. In total, I think this is the 3rd or 4th time they have tried to gain approval.
As far as post approval price is concerned, I think the intraday high will be around $1.20-$1.30 and then settling just under a dollar. $3.00 a share would be around 1 billion in sales. Not there yet. It will get there and probably above, but not until 4Q next year.
Bottom line...they received an approvable letter and completed the task requested in letter. It not gaining approval this week would be most surprising. GLTA
Gonzilee,
I'm not going to take the advice of someone who flip flops. Your wasting your time here.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42319176
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42284587
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42284512
Great call on CBJG as well, I didn't take your advice and have made over 200%. Thanks for not knowing what you are talking about. GLTU
P.S.
We're all still waiting for info. about your "friend" that has the technology to blow MDFI and others away.
Negative FCF in a tech firm is fairly common, it can take years before any return is realized. Most likely, the capital raised by equity offerings is used for maintenance and operating expenditures.
That was popularized in the 1990's tech boom. The company would have to keep issuing equity until the sales and profits mature and they become self sustainable . I'm not sure what the impact of the one year free giveaway is. That alone could have heavily delayed any realized return.
Future performance is the key. Future performance is why NFCF isn't a "negative thing" in a speculative investmet. Which is why we need to see an increase in sales and profit. The 93% change can be seen as a comfirmation of that increase.
Negative FCF in an established company is a negative thing. About the only time it isn't a bad thing, is when it's a speculative investment. So the 93% change is an encouraging thing. It means they are starting to realize a return on capital expenditures. But, we need to see that it's paying off in increased sales and profit. Hopefully, the upcoming filing will show us exactly that. IMO
JHC Stervc
Great work, not only here but EVRM as well.
Sitting on the bid and ask.
Is who? ........well NITE of course. When we made the move from .0023 back up to the .0030 range....guess who wasn't sitting on both the bid/ask?....I know it's not a conspiracy, blaming someone for holding it down just makes me feel better.
Things are still of track.
This stock is now an investment, it was traded last week. That moment is gone, if that's why you got in, best to move along. Golden Cross happened, there are of course detracters of that theory. That's why you look for other GC indicators.
One of which is parallel sma's before the cross, which we have. The 100sma and 50sma have been sliding sideways together for months. The 100sma is turning upward too follow the 50sma. Another great indication is the direction of the 200sma when the cross happens. Downward being the least satisfing. The cross happened when the 200sma began to move sideways. Watch the 200sma in days and/or weeks to come. If it begins to turn up and follow the climb of the 50sma, you don't get a much clearer perspective than that as far as the technicals are concerned.
The result: steady, sustained uptrend for a period measured not in days or weeks, but months. There will be pull back, there will be consolidation to solidify new support levels then on up to the rung and repeat.
Tomorrow will be a telling day, last Friday we had a great bounce off the .0025 level. We didn't finish below that today, hopefully it will hold tomorrow. GLTA.
Why am I not suprised to see NITE sitting on both the ask & bid.
"And in the future i see companies that restrict the patient to access to the data to have more growth. Its easier to get a hold of Obama then it is to see your medical records, Doctors and companies don't want patience to see that data, especially doctors. I see them supporting a system which allows for faster medical records to move between their offices and insurance companies but not client access."
I greatly disagree that patients will have restricted access. IT'S THE PATIENTS RECORDS. Medical records are not hard too obtain for an individual. If you have to access a potential clients record, as you say you do, you would know that all you need is a simple medical records release authorization.
Any attempt to restrict a patients access to their own records flies in the face of privacy laws. The same privacy laws restrict other doctors and insurance companies access to these records w/o the patients prior consent (medical records release authorization). My first professional position out of college was as an insurance adjuster. When investigating injury claims, the only thing I needed was the signed authorization to get copies of complete medical records. Nothing hard about it.
golden cross forming? Or is it just me?