Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"your just making this company look like something bad that only in time we will find out what they are all about."
eeso is a pump and dump, nothing more nothing less. there has been more than enough evidence posted on ihub, and for that matter IN, that proves this fact. many should give up defending that scheißer jared.
on a positive note, the markets looking great today!
i was actually joking, but you were being pretty harsh with talkoption.
i thought so...
jared owns the shares of esi, not eeso.
lazy,
what is false information? what talkoption stated? what he stated is on the indiana secretary of state website if you care to look. nothing talkoption stated is false...nothing...
thanks for that. i was too lazy to post it. how can anyone, other than mullets and hochstedlers, justify jared's actions? he is a train wreck..............
i believe the guy in the video called it a production facility a couple times. i believe he also talked about producing wow green product. he must be the liar, not jared.
i agree that if your a shareholder in eeso and you don't want to here about the negative side of your stock, you should put the naysayers on ignore. a lot of people should follow their own advice.
amen...
the quicker this pump and dump is shut down the better.
it's not my opinion. i know jared is a crook. each day that goes by is one more day closer to federal prison for jared.
in your dreams.......
dude, you are the bomb! thanks for the copius dd! best in a while. do all you guys still trust jared! he is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over again. gee, maybe that's really eeso's portage facility? no, eeso never had a portage facility! should be interesting tomorrow.
all very stinkie
http://digg.com/users/38modify
apologize for what? stating the obvious by calling eeso a pinkie pump? how can anyone with any sense believe jared is going to take eeso to new heights? the guy surrounds himself with scammers and buffoons. the latest buffoon is this jeff montange. the guy pumps kistler's projects since early 2008 then creates a website where he can pick and choose what is posted. this just stinks to the core.
than why didn't jeff montange tour the facility?
jeff has followed eeso since early 2008, always an avid supporter. funny thing is, he also supported grem. another pinkie turd created by kistler.
38modify
you were there. you toured the facility. oh, did you tour eeso's portage facility? no, you didn't, because there isn't one. seems to me there was a little press release put out by eeso about their new facility in portage. another lie. heck, you could have driven to it on your way back to michigan(or viginia). oh, by the way, during your visit, did you see thousands of dollars of product leaving the ft. wayne facility? doubt it.... this turd has run its course no matter how much time IN puts into it.
yeah, I know.
a friend of mine said vintage chemival has been around for a while. evidently a college buddy of his is a higher up there.
Year End Statement Will Read
GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The future success of the Company is likely dependent on its ability to attain additional capital to develop its proposed products and ultimately, upon its ability to attain future profitable operations. Management intends to use borrowings and security sales to mitigate the effects of its cash position, however no assurance can be given that debt or equity financing, if and when required will be available. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue existence.
SATISFACTION OF OUR CASH OBLIGATIONS FOR THE NEXT 12 MONTHS.
We plan on satisfying our cash obligations over the next twelve months through additional equity and/or third party financing and through revenue generated from our anticipated product sales. During 2009 we were able to sustain operations through the issuance of stock for services. However, under our current plan of operation we may not have the minimal cash requirement to continue in operation for the next 12 months without additional equity or third party financing. Management anticipates the needs for additional funds but at this time is not able to determine how much will be necessary. We do not anticipate generating revenues sufficient enough to satisfy our working capital requirements within the next twelve months. Additionally, we will continue to issue stock to our consultants in lieu of making cash payment to consultants. In 2009, we issued consultants shares of our common stock valued at approximately $3,000,000.
July 9, 2009 - Fort Wayne Journal Gazette
Local enzyme maker buys chemical firm
Enzyme Solutions Inc. has acquired Vintage Chemical Enterprises Inc. for an undisclosed sum.
Fort Wayne-based Enzyme Solutions is a biotechnology company that makes enzymes and enzyme formulas used in cleaners for medical equipment, removing coffee stains and other applications. Fort Wayne-based Vintage Chemical is a specialty chemical manufacturer. The deal took effect July 1.
Tim Beck, Enzyme Solutions CEO, described the merger as “a natural fit” for two companies that have been working together almost daily for several years. Vintage Chemical formulates several Enzyme Solutions products, using Enzyme Solutions technology.
The combined venture, which employs 12, will operate in Fort Wayne at 314 E. Wallace St. and in Garrett at 2105 Forrest Park Drive.
correct me if i am wrong, but i don't recall telling you to sell your shares. i am telling investors not to invest in this turd, however. must be lonely over at in. how many positive shareholders over there? at least you have jeff....
because... although bill white is not brilliant, at least he surrounds himself with brilliant people. the pr guys he hired are off the hook. he doesn't hire an unemployed associate pastor to a high ranking mangement position. bill has got the concept, surround yourself with people smarter than you. you would think jared would not have a problem doing this, but obviously he has. in jeff, neubauer, douglass, moises, white, april, murph....cmon! bill will have success because he gets it. the smartest guys jared associated himself with were kistler and carnes. unfortunately, they are criminals. i had an epiphany tonight.... it's not that jared is a terrible person, it's he is really really not very bright. omg, that wane tv interview he did.... why not walk to the us attorney's office and turn yourself in.... he could sell an established product. beyond that? his head is in the clouds. thanks for sharing scott.
agree, but i posted a while back my wife purchased a new product from a new zealand company named eco store. ecostoreusa.com
they were able to land a contract with meijer. based upon eco store, they consider enzymes to be a nasty ingredient. they claim enzymes can rejuvenate in washed clothing potentially causing allergic reactions. that's right live enzymes crawling on your body.
wife said the laundry detergent and whitener worked great (we are on a well). hard to believe a wow green could compete with this. meijer is michigan based as is wow green. eco store's products are a fraction of the cost of wow green. check it out lang.
please.....
there never was a south korean contract. douglass made uno trip to the fareast. the korean trip was more smoke and mirrors. sure, hog prices have dropped. was the poop remediation the only thing in eeso's aresenal? i sure hope not because the poop problem ain't a big enough problem for a hog farmer to cut into his profit for the sake of his neighbor's senses. yes, it is jared's fault that wow green turned into a debacle for eeso. sounds to me jared put all his eggs into the wow green basket and made insane sales projections to boost the price of the stock. this is all about jared's, douglass' and neubauer's greed. and kistler and carnes and so forth and so forth....
78%? Not bad. Who are the investors supposed to have faith and trust in? Jared? Even after Jared violated that trust on several occasions? Having faith in Jared is worse than blind faith. It's more like being blind and having Jared throw you into traffic. How many times does that have to happen before your faith cracks? I don't think anyone at EESO knows what direction to take.
can you elaborate on this revelation. i know what you are talking about, but how do you know this?
looking very grim here today. musicman, i was being facetious. i thought this was obvious. douglass is doing nothing but cutting and pasting over there. i was being sarcastic.
what projects are in the works? murphy did not do much elaborating. something for shoe odor? yeah, that market isn't tapped. i don't think we will ever see audited financials. matter of fact, i am willing to wager an independent accountant has not been engaged yet.
i agree... many smart guys on this board. many were trading, but some were long. i wouldn't trust jared with my petty cash. this i don't understand. my first vision of jared was con artist. maybe i'm a pessimist, but i saw a used car salesman. although i was very familiar with carnes and kisler. the finacials were laughable. hopefully, many got out before the crash. not trying to make anyone lose money other than jared and his cohorts. not trying to save anyone at this point.
thanks for that abcdefg.
you are an asset to the board. i printed off your post and will be reading it in an hour of so when dinner kicks in. when you get a chance, please post the options available for the HBG-30D-SS. thanks abcdefg! as always your insight is extremely valuable.
i admit when i first posted here i knew this was a pinkie pump. i realized then jared was a liar and scammer. i also knew douglass was part of the scam. lol... coward? i guess if i had a bannana clip i would feel a bit more froggy. feelin froggy? jump! lol
great trading day today. biocentric seems to be moving along nicely.
haha, like your bananna clip. with a weapon like that i would feel i could take on all comers. i guess tactical weapons tend to do that to a guy. lol
jared is the only one misleading people. i call the financials "amateurish and obviously fabricated" you say "Jared has quickly put together some rough numbers". really a question of semantics.
you are incorrect. once i passed the cpa exam, i was no longer considered a staff accountant. i will admit one thing, i sucked at public accounting. absolutely hated it.
i am also a CPA and was once an auditor for a regional firm. i also did compilations and reviews. what i can tell you is eeso's q1 through Q4 2008 financials would not stand up to a review. they are amateurish and obviously fabricated. if i came into audit eeso, i would be very skeptical based upon the prior years financials. for lack of a better term, our partners would want us to "audit the hell" out of the financials due to it being a first year audit. hard to believe an ernst and young auditor and cpa could look at eeso's 2008 released financials and say "ya, i want to invest".
very nice sir.
don't forget to mention the farm as an asset even though eeso doesn't own it and the mortgage payable even though it's a land contract.
also, where in the hell did that "goodwill" number come from? who did eeso acquire to justify goodwill of close to a million smackers?
the $3 million plus of the formulas is also a joke.
i agree, i bet the cpa firm walks out before cash is audited.
"Synthetic enzymes are widely used in laundry products.
They are effective at breaking down proteins and fat stains on clothes. Using enzymes means you can wash in cold water and you don't need as many harsh chemicals. We believe the downside of using synthetic enzymes in laundry products is more significant. If residual enzymes are trapped in your clothing/sheets/underwear they are up against your skin day and night. They can be reactivated by sweat and moisture - and start doing the job they were designed for - removing fats/protein - on your skin and potentially causing allergic reactions or other health complications."
i guess we will never know as wow green was never tested....
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WOW GREEN INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
A Michigan Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No:
Hon.
ALEXANDER SCHAUSS,
An Individual,
Defendant.
_ ____________________________________________________________________________
Fakih & Associates, PLLC
By: SAM FAKIH ( P68876)
Attorney for Plaintiff
23400 Michigan Ave., Suite 110
Dearborn, MI 48124
Phone: 313-846-6300
Fax: 313-846-3200
E-mail: sfakih@fakihlegal.com
____________________________________________________________________________
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Wow Green International, LLC (“Plaintiff”), for its claim against defendant
Alexander Schauss (“Defendant”), alleges as follows:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant for promissory estoppel and fraud
based upon the parties business dealings and relationship between 2008 and early 2009.
2. During this time, Plaintiff and Defendant engaged in protracted negotiations for
Defendant to join Plaintiff as an employee and member of Plaintiff’s executive team. During the
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 1 of 8
-2- 2
negotiation period, Defendant made numerous representations, held himself out as a member of
Plaintiff’s executive team and induced Plaintiff to detrimentally rely on his assertions of material
fact that he was joining Plaintiff as an employee.
3. An employment contract was drawn up and agreed upon. However, on February
19, 2009, right before the agreement was to be signed and shortly before Plaintiff was to begin
his employment, Defendant terminated his relationship with Plaintiff, resulting in damages.
4. In bringing this action, Plaintiff seeks money damages, costs and attorneys fees.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1332 (diversity jurisdiction). The amount in controversy for the Plaintiff exceeds $75,000.00,
exclusive of costs and interest. It is an action between residents of different states.
6. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2). Defendant availed
himself of this Venue by negotiating and offering to become employed by Plaintiff, a Michigan
based company. In addition, Defendant traveled to Michigan to discuss and negotiate his
employment with Plaintiff, events that give rise to this action.
PARTIES
7. Plaintiff is a Michigan Limited Liability Company organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Michigan with its principal place of business located at 1000 Town
Center, Suite 2330, Southfield, Michigan.
8. Defendant is an individual residing at 4117 South Meridian, Puyallup, State of
Washington.
FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 2 of 8
-3- 3
9. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by referenced paragraphs 1 through 8 as set forth
above.
10. Plaintiff is a network marketing company, a form of enterprise also known as a
direct sales organization or a multilevel marketing company.
11. As part of its business plan, Plaintiff seeks to market, distribute and sell natural,
sustainable, enzyme- based green household cleaning products throughout the world.
12. Plaintiff launched its products on February 15, 2009.
13. Prior to the launch of its products, Plaintiff needed to have its products as well as
the products of its competitors scientifically tested for safety, efficacy and toxicity.
14. In furtherance of this need for testing, Plaintiff entered into an Independent
Contractor Agreement with AIBMR Life Sciences, Inc. (“AIBMR”) on December 31, 2008
pursuant to which AIBMR agreed to perform all the required testing prior to the launch of the
product on February 15, 2009. Exhibit “A.”
15. Pursuant to the Independent Contractor Agreement, Plaintiff provided a $10,000
retainer to AIBMR.
16. Defendant was the founder of and a member/owner of AIBMR Life Sciences, Inc.
17. Prior to the execution of the Independent Contractor Agreement with AIBMR,
Plaintiff and Defendant began negotiations in the fall of 2008 for Defendant to assume the title
and position of Chief Scientific Officer for Plaintiff, to commence March 1, 2009.
18. In addition to the above mentioned position in Plaintiff’s company, Plaintiff also
offered for Defendant to be an active voting member of Plaintiff’s Board of Directors and shares of
the company upon the signing of an employment agreement.
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 3 of 8
-4- 4
19. On October 23, 2008, Defendant and Allie Mallad, President of Plaintiff, met in Las
Vegas where Defendant promised and committed to accepting the position with Plaintiff.
20. After numerous conversations to negotiate the terms of his employment, Mr.
Schauss traveled to Detroit to visit the Plaintiff’s headquarters and meet with Plaintiff’s
management team. In that meeting, Defendant addressed the management team and several
other future distributors in which he stated that he was joining Wow Green and “was thrilled to
be a part of the company”.
21. In the same visit to Detroit, Defendant participated in a series of professional
pictures which were taken of the Plaintiff’s newly assembled Management team which were
meant to be published in future press releases for the company.
22. Further, in the same visit, Defendant attended a gathering of approximately 30-40
future distributors of Plaintiff in which Defendant held himself out to be the future person in
charge of Plaintiff’s Scientific program.
23. Specific terms of an employment agreement were negotiated for months between
Plaintiff and Defendant resulting in a final version sometime in December of 2008.
24. On December 31, 2008, in a conference call, Mr. Schauss solidified his
commitment that he is accepting the position of Chief Scientific Officer at Plaintiff, including all
the terms of the employment agreement and declared that he is “fully on Board” with only the
precise date to be determined.
25. On January 19, 2009, without explanation, Defendant informed Plaintiff that he
will not be joining Plaintiff.
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 4 of 8
-5- 5
26. In addition, AIBMR terminated its contract with Plaintiff without performing any
of the contracted for testing and returned the $10,000 retainer.
27. As a result of Defendant’s repeated promises and assurances which Plaintiff
detrimentally relied upon, Plaintiff’s products were not tested prior to launch and another Chief
Scientific Officer could not be hired prior to the products launch.
28. As a result of the Defendant’s actions, promises and false assertions of material
facts, the Plaintiff’s products were not tested prior to launch resulting in damages to Plaintiff’s
reputation and business as well as lost profits and revenue.
COUNT I-PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL
29. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by referenced paragraphs 1 through 28 as set forth
above.
30. On numerous occasions, as described in this complaint, including on October 23,
2008, December 1, 2008, and December 31, 2008, Defendant promised and committed to
Plaintiff that he would be joining Plaintiff as Chief Scientific Officer with the duties of testing all
of Plaintiff’s products for safety, efficacy and toxicity.
31. To further induce Plaintiff into believing he would join Plaintiff, Defendant
engaged in protracted negotiations and actively participated in the drafting of an employment
agreement, the execution of which Defendant repeatedly delayed.
32. As a result of Defendants promises and actions, Defendant should have
reasonably expected to induce Plaintiff to forbear in the hiring of another Chief Scientific Officer
before it launched its products as well as to forebear from having its products tested before the
product launch.
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 5 of 8
-6- 6
33. Plaintiff’s were in fact induced to forebear in hiring of another Chief Scientific
Office and induced to forebear in having its products tested prior to the products launch.
34. Defendant failed to honor his promise causing an injustice to Plaintiff.
35. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s false promises, as described
above, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of $250,000, including damages to its
reputation, business and lost profits, plus interest, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees as of the
date of this Complaint, and any further relief the interests of justice and equity require.
COUNT II - FRAUD
36. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by referenced paragraphs 1 through 35 as set forth
above.
37. Defendant made false and misleading representations of material fact to Plaintiff
regarding his desire, promise and assurances that he would join Plaintiff as the Chief Scientific
Officer and perform testing on Plaintiff’s products prior to their launch on February 15, 2008.
38. Defendant made the false and misleading promises to Plaintiff regarding his
intention to work for Plaintiff while he was negotiating employment with Monavie, and
intentionally misled and made false statements to Plaintiff in order to secure a more lucrative
employment offer from Monavie.
39. Defendant’s representations to Plaintiff that he promised to join Plaintiff were
false, fraudulent and misleading.
40. The false representations made by Defendant to Plaintiff concerning his promise
to work for Defendant and test Defendant’s products before their launch were material and
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 6 of 8
-7- 7
central to Plaintiff’s decision to not seek others for the position or have the products tested by
others before their launch.
41. Defendant intended that Plaintiff would be induced and act upon his false
representations and that Plaintiff would be induced to forebear in hiring someone else for the
position or have its products tested before the launch.
42. Plaintiff reasonably and justifiably relied upon the representations made by
Defendant to it.
43. Plaintiff, to whom Defendant’s representations were made, was ignorant as to the
falsity of the representations regarding Defendant’s promises to accept employment with
Plaintiff and Defendant’s promises to test the products and justifiably relied on these
representations and would have hired someone else and had the products tested prior to the
launch but for the lies and fraudulent conduct of Defendant.
44. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s fraud, as described above,
Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of $500,000, including damages to its
reputation, business and lost profits, plus interest, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees as of the
date of this Complaint, and any further relief the interests of justice and equity require.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court enter a judgment against
Defendant in the amount consistent with the damages sustained, plus costs and attorney fees
wrongfully incurred to bring this action, in addition to any other damages as provided by the
applicable law.
Case 2:09-cv-12566-SJM-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 7 of 8
can't respond to pm's
actually behl looks very interesting. biofuel from algae? count me in.
a savior? if you say so.
so what's this biocentric all about. seems interesting. i have some homework to do.
huh?
your post did not make sense, but then again i have tipped a few. i am solid with my dd. no worries....
trust your gut.
craig made a fortune on eeso. i can't speak for the rest as i don't know who they are. craig dumped tons of shares.... past and recent.... if your are looking to trade, best of luck.. bottom line, jared is a scum bag idiot. craig is a scum bag idiot. mark neubauer is a scum bag idiot. these boys will all pay for their actions....
then i must have been sold a rotten bill of goods. the label says "what's good for you health is also good for the earth. our products are highly biodegradable and contain earth safe ingredients from sustainable resources. ph balanced ecotore laundry liquid is grey water safe for garden, lawns and trees." it further states: "reduce exposure to unhealthy chemicals. many sythetic chemicals are known to be harmful to health and can cause skin irritation or eczema. we use plant based ingredients, simple mineral salts and essential plant oils... for effective results." also, there is not one warning label on the bottle. if the soap was harmful if swallowed, you can bet your bottom the bottle would have a warning label. also, they got into meijer. seems to me the best eeso ever did was get into a marathon gas station. also my thrifty, picky and annoying wife bought it. to me that says volumes. i will do a couple shots of eco store laundry liquid tonight and let everyone know the results. if i don't post tomorrow, you know the results, lazy was right.
just came from the local meijer. a lady had a table set up featuring a new green company, eco store. www.ecostoreusa.com
company was started 15-years ago in new zealand and its products are now available in the U.S. their moto is "no nasty chemicals. they define enzymes as a nasty chemical:
"Synthetic enzymes are widely used in laundry products.
They are effective at breaking down proteins and fat stains on clothes. Using enzymes means you can wash in cold water and you don't need as many harsh chemicals. We believe the downside of using synthetic enzymes in laundry products is more significant. If residual enzymes are trapped in your clothing/sheets/underwear they are up against your skin day and night. They can be reactivated by sweat and moisture - and start doing the job they were designed for - removing fats/protein - on your skin and potentially causing allergic reactions or other health complications."
in other words - enzymes suck! who wants active enzymes crawling on their bodies? not Mr. Biggerstaff. my wife bought two bottles of laundry liquid, a bottle of laundry whitener and a bottle of dishwashing liquid. she commented that the laundry liquid is cheaper than tide. one 32 fl. oz. bottle does at least 27 loads. mr. biggerstaff thinks the enzyme era is OVER.