Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
looks impressive, but to tell you honestly, that doesn't make a difference ...maybe the 70-90% failure should be represented by power brands and the world would have 100% success
oh really?
and that is because? hmmm, Consumer Product studies indicate Nine out of ten new businesses fail and in the U.S. packaged goods industry, companies introduce 30,000 products every year, but 70% to 90% of them don’t stay on store shelves, if they can afford store slotting fees, for more than 12 months; of the 10-30% that do, they're products that are well funded and are introduced by companies with revenues of 10M and above ...the old saying "it's great because I created it" "everyone will love it because I created it" just don't cut it in the world of business reality....does that mean it won't become popular, no, but the odds are tremendous it won't
Did i miss it? when is the debut of Premier Brands BBV...
I love to admit it ...I'm always right
100% AGREE - ABSOLUTELY
yep, with the help of shareholder $
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=91206274
...there's a fake out on the bid ..but go ahead and buy as much of those three's as u like and put your faith in the manipulation, at the hands of the prop traders and MM if you believe beause the co won't do it for you...
I only had to read it once ...to know this going nowhere as a co...the price ticker can be manipulated either direction anytime with any stock
lol ...that's what I think & know of that TTDZ Q
That's your prerogative ...I don't get excited about people setting themselves up to lose money ..or entice others out of theirs
ask yourself as a shareholder, or before you become a TTDZ shareholder, why are a certain few consistently thinking outloud about TTDZ ...it seems subliminal
anyone could see there wuz special interest behind the pump of TTDZ today
Forget the ttdz volume, after a couple hundred posts telling you she's gonna run big big big, she ends at .0002 ...and I almost believed
In trial actual evidence will actually become available ..we'll have to see actually what evidence is admissible
Sleazier than CIRC?
settlement with little or NO damages or penalties?maybe? run out the the contract or run out a revised contract? maybe?...i suggest some research on settlements and shareholders and see the many ways a settlement can be written; and th many ways the legal system, or accounting dept of corp governance can screw the shareholder ...there are instances where settlements just don't necessarily mean instant riches but quite the opposite
I bet the rainbow chasers would differ
Defenses to a Breach of Contract Claim
If you're sued for breach of contract, raise all applicable affirmative defenses.[This should have been filed by Playboy early on but now better than never]
In a contract dispute over a breach of contract, you should raise as many legal defenses as possible, including "affirmative defenses." It's usually not enough to simply deny legal wrongdoing; you must respond with every plausible argument that justifies your position. And, if you don't raise defenses in the early stages of a breach of contract lawsuit, you may be prevented from raising them later. This article explains how affirmative defenses work and looks at the kinds of legal defenses that might be used in response to a breach of contract claim. (To learn more about what makes an agreement irreparably broken in the eyes of the law, check out Nolo's article Breach of Contract: Material Breach.)
What Is an Affirmative Defense to a Breach of Contract Claim?
Most defenses to a breach of contract claim are referred to as "affirmative defenses." As a legal matter, this means that the party raising the defense (the person sued for breach of contract) has the burden of proving the defense, if the dispute goes to trial.
An affirmative defense does not contest the primary claims or facts (for example, that there was a breach of contract), but instead asserts mitigating facts or circumstances that render the breach claim moot. In other words, it is like saying, "Even if I breached the contract, the other party should not win the lawsuit." For example, let's say that Dodd, a teenage singer, fails to show up for a concert and is accused of breaching his contract to provide entertainment services. Regardless of whether he breached the agreement, Dodd may assert the affirmative defense that he lacked the capacity to enter into the contract in the first place because he's a minor. (Learn more about what this means in Nolo's article Who Lacks the Capacity to Contract?)
Common Affirmative Defenses to a Breach of Contract Claim
How you frame your legal defenses in a breach of contract lawsuit is limited only by your lawyer's imagination (and your ability to bankroll legal fees). Some of the most common defenses are listed below.
The contract was supposed to be in writing. If the other side argues that an oral agreement [a promise to continue contract?] should be enforced against you, you may be able to defend yourself by claiming that a state law (known as the "statute of frauds") requires the type of contract -- for example, for the sale of real property -- to be in writing.
The contract is indefinite. If the essential terms were never agreed upon, you may be able to defend by arguing that the contract is indefinite. This means either the parties did not consider the deal to be final or that a court could not discern the essentials, even by implication (for example, if it's not clear how long an agreement should last or what the specifications are for a construction project). Agreements to agree (such as letters of intent or agreements in principle) are usually considered indefinite and therefore unenforceable, although courts will require the parties to act in good faith to reach an agreement.
There is a mistake. You can defend yourself by proving that a mutual mistake was made as to an essential fact in the contract -- for example, both parties were mistaken as to the authenticity of a painting. You cannot use this defense when referring to a mistake in judgment by one party ("Oops, I could have gotten so much more for my painting!")
You lacked capacity to contract. If you lacked capacity (that is, you couldn't understand what you were doing when you entered into the deal, as discussed in the example above), the contract may be voidable. This defense is most likely to succeed in the case of minors and those with mental incapacities.
You were fraudulently induced to enter into a contract. A contract will be invalid if it was induced by lies, under duress ("Sign this or we'll take your cat"), or by a trusted person's undue influence (your real estate agent advises you to buy because she secretly gets a kickback from the seller).
The contract is unconscionable. A contract won't be enforced if it is grossly unfair. This almost always occurs in situations where the bargaining power is severely imbalanced (as in a contract of adhesion) and the party with more power takes advantage by forcing unfair conditions, clauses, or waivers on the other party.
estoppel. When one party makes a statement excusing performance of the agreement and the other party relies on that statement, the first party may be prevented from later denying that statement and claiming a breach. For example, if a bank president calls a homeowner and tells her that the bank won't foreclose for six months in order to give the homeowner a chance to sell the home, the bank will be held to its six-month promise.
The contract is illegal. A contract is unenforceable if its object or the thing bargained for is illegal -- for example, a contract that enables prostitution, violates tax laws, or requires the destruction of records. Contracts that may indirectly aid illegal purposes will sometimes be enforced -- for example, an agreement to supply gambling machines, even though they may be illegal in some states, may be enforced. Sometimes, a court will sever the illegal aspect from the agreement, leaving the rest of the contract enforceable.
The Catch-All Defense: Arguing in the Alternative
If you've been sued for breach of contract, the law permits you to claim as many alternative defenses as you want, even if they contradict each other. For example, you may argue that the contract is invalid or unenforceable, that you performed as required by the contract, and alternatively, that your failure to perform was justified by the other party's actions -- even though those arguments can't all be true. (It's a little bit like the criminal defense attorney who argues his client was 100 miles from the scene of the murder and, alternatively, that the murder was in self-defense.) Finally, in some cases, you may admit to the breach and assert defenses only to the damages claimed by the other side.
I've flipped shares, yes, I've sold, yes, I have mostly free shares, yes I don't claim being long while flipping, absolutely & I don't shy from or hide the legitimate business realities or facts for my own benefit; Honesty does very well for me and i haven't lost to a penny stock in a decade [other than wmi* bankruptcy, but that's a dif event]- that's FACT ...NEXT
Have these mainly insignificant procedural rulings made anyone money without selling or flipping their shares on movement or moved anyone anywhere closer to winning the war? didn't think so
Yes, look they confirm Shares Outstanding 4,020,491,910 a/o Aug 16, 2013 for all those who tried to explain it away
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIRC/company-info
don't blame the messenger, they just react to what th market & traders dictate ... most of us took our profits in th 2's and repeat th process
There be still NO RAINBOW landing in the BRND Backyard according to new recent Twitter Posts as of a few minutes ago
looks like the price gods could give a bleep about a 5-0 record based on insignificant procedural court rulings vs winning th war
WARNING: PR LINK FROM TWITTER ACCT ... this tweet from th BBV verified twitter acct by me seems to verify recent PR's validity with a link to th actual PR concerning BRND current future with BBV
Twitter acct BBV had long conversation going on with many disgruntled shareholders
WARNING: PR LINK FROM TWITTER ACCT ... Disclaimer: this post absolutely not a post to scam my fellow man [lol] this tweet from th BBV twitter acct seems to verify recent PR's validity with a link to th actual PR concerning BRND current future with BBV
Twitter acct BBV had long conversation going on with many disgruntled shareholders and I'm sure a good number of th pumpers knew of this while they were posting their challenges to its validity and calling th PR fake ...as they continue to do inorder to get a hold of your money
so will I to a certain point ...but no 8K does not = PR fake
wrong ...in so many ways, and not a logical way to invest
WRONG ...there has been huge price variation here, possibly deliberate, and there is strong possibility of violation of law with dissemination of information by a third party if fake; BRND has a legal obligation to shareholders just as SEC has legal obligation to investigate eventually
never guess, contact twitter and ask ...or is that suppose to be subliminal?
AB didn't have to , they are a private co; but BRND legally should have addressed this through an 8K or PR since they are a public co [or were? lol], just for th sake of shareholders & shareholder value
Either way chances are there will be eventual SEC investigations into BRND and the relationship with th worm & Johansson
IMO
scams will always surprise you with innovative measures as they all think they're "smarter than the average yogi bear"
nope still there ...follow th conversation
WARNING: PR LINK FROM TWITTER ACCT ...I don't know about anyone else and their interpretation of this tweet, but this tweet from th BBV twitter acct seems to verify recent PR's validity with a link to th actual PR
Twitter acct BBV had long conversation going on with many disgruntled shareholders
and I'm sure a good number of th pumpers knew of this while they were posting their challenges to its validity and calling th PR fake
PR LINK FROM TWITTER ACCT ...I don't know about anyone else and their interpretation of this tweet, but this tweet from th BBV twitter acct seems to verify recent PR's validity with a link to th actual PR
and I'm sure a good number of th pumpers knew of this while they were posting their challenges to its validity and calling th PR fake
Everyone listen to those complicit pumpers ...when everyone moves on to their next symbol to trade- date never marry, hold some but flip the hell out of it..never listen to 4 -5 of the same type of scammers like th ones found here th last month 1/2
GLTU
What negativity? and what good do you refer, I say again, hire a good business advisory based on those fees you save or accountant ...this pos is one of the worst in my portfolio and it's future is nothing more than an outcome of a contract dispute - who can outlast who?...just the facts and the benefit of my past global marketing experience... I don't wait for rainbows to land in my backyard, although some have landed there...but it doesn't matter as I make sure the assets grow daily - I don't love one stock or another, but know the status of an equity at any given time; I will dump more of the 10M left tomorrow if it ever gets past the MM trap or my indicators say so before finality is imminent or R/S is absolute most likely before you or anyone...
some people can hold a position with their feet on th ground; others are up in the stratosphere breathing thin air ...i have my feet firmly on th ground ...I trade 200+ stocks and have no desire or reason to BS anyone or scam my fellow man for a buck [do I post on every board? NO ..no need to - i don't scam]; just deal with th realities and keep adding up th moolah ...why now? because it was suggested that I buy some cheap shares so I set the record straight
realistically, what good things? hire an accountant to give you the dibs on th CIRC 10Q ... just a gamble on a contractual dispute outcome, a lawsuit, and the biz, i wouldn't count on long term ...I hold a small amt 10M shares between 3's & 5's - my philosophy is to hold some but flip more and never pump misery on anyone ...No posts on my part were used or intended to purchase or sell shares at anytime... I can dump at anytime and could care less if it lands a rainbow in someones back yard or erases their holdings ... the real facts here in CIRC speak for themselves
Thanks for my brnd profits