Qui est avec moi?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
NNVC is blessed.
We are blessed.
Humanity is blessed!
NNVC is becoming increasingly recognized in the stock market world :
Of course - why would any sane shareholder predict anything else!!
Been walkabout.
So where is the rise in SP that should accompany such a plethora of great news?
Succesful Headlines from the company: ...
Thanks, I still hold NNVC in a stock-picking contest
...
Recovering nicely now.
If I may...
The fact that something has taken a long time does not by itself support a claim that the result will take another long time. In some cases, yes, I would definitely agree.
Back to my dumb car analogies: The race is 2000 miles. The car has been on the road for hours. Someone says, "We should see one cross the finish line soon." Someone else has said, "No you won't. They have been already been on the road for hours."
A slightly adjusted analogy: I've seen car #34 in 10 previous races. The driver and owner of the car have promised me 10 times in each of those races that they would at least place in third or better in the race. In each of those prior 10 races, the car has broken down and was unable to finish. I'm a little skeptical if the car can finish race #11.
That seems to me to be the logic you are using.
There are definite things that need to be done before a nanoviricide will be shown to work in humans. Those things are being done now, and in an orderly and professional way. It makes sense to predict that we are now much closer to the "finish line" than we were years ago. Unless it doesn't work.
Whether or not they poster to whom you have responded is right about his "six months" prediction, I can't say. But I do know that criticizing his prediction by saying a lot of time has already passed is not persuasive. Yet it is logical to me, and I'm not sure I would call it 'criticizing.' I asked how he knew it would be six months (so he must have some basis for that time prediction) and conditioned my question with past results (although I will give you the adage, "Past performance is not an indication of future results."
The results are less than 6 months from totally being on the table. Hats off to them for all the work it took to get here.
Achoo, nevertheless.
Anyone who wouldn't plunk down a few thousand on NNVC is out of their minds!
Either the science works and the company is worth 20B-50B or it doesn't and it is worth ZERO.
Monitoring the day to day, month to month, year to year fluctuations of a Start up Bio company is the equivalent of monitoring the flight patterns of the fruit bat and trying to determine how long it will live?
The stock is now voting on a 3 to one split increasing the common stock to 150M shares, so what?
It is curious as to why anyone would spend more than 1 hour of their life posting comment after comment, day after day, when it boils down to the simple fact that they are worth 20B or nothing. Who cares?
This isn't a stock to trade.
It is a stock to invest some money in and hope the science proves out.
If not you lose your investment.
If it does you win big!
Ho! Ho! Ho!
Just curious why no one on an investment site board has mentioned the upcoming vote to increase NNVC common shares to 150M?
Everyone seems to jibber jabbering about nothing when this vital piece of news is laying about!
Of course NNVC doesn't make money (yet). Of course the stock goes up and down. Of course there are delays in a Bio stock. Of course they can ship more cides when the new facility is fully ramped up. Of course they wouldn't spend all that money on a new facility if they didn't believe in the science. Of course they are not snake oil salesmen when they are doing all of the above.
If NNVC was a scam they would have ran away with a lot more cash a long time ago.
Some people will sell and feel disappointed
Some will buy and be very excited
I'd expect a tad of resistance at $20.
'bout freakin' time.
What's the need for continued strife & controversy here? Assess your own risk tolerance. Assess what you think the real risk here at NNVC is. Assess your ROI expectations. Make a decision and stay, or go.
Seymour is a pumper who hardly ever gets a timeline right
Soon we will know.
Hey, you said it was a question for the board and then you answered the question yourself.
No fair.
That's the first I've heard of that practice.
I have watched this supposed "death spiral" pattern happen numerous times over the last few years...
Newmoney is correct as usual as the fizzle continues.
Do you always refer to yourself in the third person?
Oh wait, I forgot you are actually Rawnoc. Never mind...
NewMoney is correct as usual as fizzle continues.
Im no longer concerned for longs because after all the warnings, they chose to donate their money to the "good doctors". Whoever came up with that name?
I do. I believe the price may go down a bit more before an event occurs that may cause it to rise.
But the opportunity would be even greater if purchased at $2.00 or $1.50...
Let's see what tomorrow brings.
I'm not convinced...
If i had dry powder available at the moment i would be buying all that i could get my hands on. We have seen this many times since NNVC became a reporting company. For those who doubt me look at the long term chart as it tells the truth about history. This is one of those times that if you load up you will be rewarded for it.
Surely, you bait me.
I was wondering who would be dumb enough to buy a super speculative stock like NNVC on margin.
Just pack up our troubles in our old kit-bag, and smile, smile, smile.
Is that what we should do, FN? Just let the Good Drs. mind the store for us an we not worry about anything?
I don't regard a fall in stock price as evidence that tox has not actually started or that it is likely to fail.
So noted.
Me too, LOL.
I shall try to answer your questions. Remember, I'm a layman and have no scientific knowledge (regarding this field)...
Simplified in order to illustrate a point. And as far as that goes, accurate, in my opinion.
Questions with good grounds are always worthwhile. So:
I also think it is insulting, belittling and condescending to those who have lost lots of money with every NNVC "shift of wind and tip of boat."
Very simplified analogy to a complex real-life situation. IMO.
There are plenty of reasons. And if asking questions is "stirring up worry," then questions should not be asked at all, it would seem.
Quote:
If anyone has any better suggestions to raise the price, I'm all ears!
Produce 2.3 kg of Flucide and complete tox.
Where is the tox studies going? I can understand if there are problems, but NNVC should be up front as to where the studies are going.