Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, well, well a name from the past AKA Sean Lee. What small circles some work in. The next move is to Bangkok.
Bangkok Administrative Office
5th Floor M. Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Road
Phatumwan,
Bangkok 10330
Go to BZTG to follow AKA Sean Lee read old post and you'll see IDCN come up.
Jumped in @ $7.80 go Zynga!
Thank God I dumped yesterday. Sold some to have free shares early then sold all but a few late yesterday.
Sold half running with free shares. Go DOMK!
Take your time now and try to follow....I'll do this real slow for you...
Where
did
I
post
$.25...like you said in you post
or
even
$.025...which I think you meant.
Again go back and read my post 19998. Take your time.
Forget it, what that has to do with what I posted God only knows. Have a nice day.
Take the time and read my post again. What don't you get?
The price will be fixed at .025 cents per share
Again another issue on this board which can be cleared up with one simple post! It's to easy to either shut down the pros or the cons. If it is addressed those that were corrected need to stand corrected.
Add it again...
Know what? I put up info that's all.
Offering circular
A legal document offering securities or mutual fund shares for sale, required by the Securities Act of 1933. It must explain the offer, including the terms, issuer, objectives (if mutual fund) or planned use of the money (if securities), historical financial statements, and other information that could help an individual decide whether the investment is appropriate for him/her. also called prospectus or circular.
What are unregistered securities or stocks?
Before securities, like stocks, bonds and notes, can be offered for sale to the public, they first must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Any stock that does not have an effective registration statement on file with the SEC is considered "unregistered." To sell or attempt to sell a financial security before it is registered is considered a felony.
However, certain exemptions apply. For example, a privately-owned corporation may issue shares of stock to its executives and board members, but the new stockholders must notify the SEC before selling the stock to someone else. In addition, companies can raise capital by soliciting investments from individuals outside the company who are considered to be "qualified investors." The SEC defines a qualified investor as someone who has a net worth of at least one million dollars or an annual income in excess of $200,000. Individuals who meet "qualified investor" status also can become victims of "private offering" unregistered securities scams.
To simple to address, a simple post from Ken saying a mistake/error was made in the PR it was not done on purpose. One simple post would hopefully shut down said discussion.
And if done I would hope you and others would post...thanks thats all we needed an acknowledgment of a mistake/error.
I just don't get it, simple things can be done to help EVERYBODY'S investment.
Chuck what doesn't help is the cryptic post from different posters...
there is a world class team of mining engineers and geologists working in the mine.
Where do you get your info from? To investors this is, if true, is helpful info for investors. Who is the team? Working in the mine? Are investors to understand they are working at this time for PIPI?
I wonder if it could have anything to do with the death of the previous claim owner?
Please explain? Why do some investors need to post bulbs to cause doubt, confussion or any mistrust?
I hope I don't get the...do your own DD or call Ken or why say anything because it will only say blah, blah, blah!
A simple PR explaining the following might alleviate some doubt...
1. A PR from Mohave Gold Mining and Exploration, Inc. verifying said agreement.
2. A PR. from PIPI explaining more on the funding ability of PIPI. If it's private funding then explain said agreement so investors will know future payments will be legit.
3. Has the first installment been paid could also be in PR. from Mohave.
4. Credentials of the Pres. of PIPI, something which has been requested since his first announcement.
5. Ken's credentials as to his mining knowledge.
6. When will the first anything at the mine begin i.e testing etc.
7. Who will be performing said testing.
8. Has PIPI applied for if needed any permits for testing on the site. Do they have them already.
9. Who will be evaluating said sample i.e. independent from any previous.
10. When testing sample are taken will the investors be notifed completed sent to whoever.
11. Clear up the PR. from the other day as to it saying Pink. Just say it was a mistake if it was.
Very simple questions which can be answered now to alleviate some doubt an help any future investors.
News from the company on where said monies are coming from to fund said fees and other costs associated with all phases of this venture will help put to rest said doubt. Simple request.
It's simple to release a PR stating private funding has been secured for fees and all phases of work. How about a PR from Mohave Gold Mining and Exploration, Inc.
News? Yes! I'm not sure why this wasn't brought to the boards attention by Ken yesterday when it was released. I'm quite sure I'll hear the usual because of this and that. To that I'll say BS hogwash!
My previous post expressed concerns when it came to the ability of PIPI being able to purchase this property.
I've seen many PR's like this over the years which never did anything but drag, delay put off any outcome one way or another. I hope this does not happen with this deal.
To further explain...
Winter is upon us and the snow has stopped all progress
Waiting for the assays to come back 4 months later.
The truck broke down, the drill broke etc. etc. etc.
The usual things to drag said truth out.
In my previous post $ was a concern and in the PR it states the financial parts of this deal. 1 million shares none issue to me. $50,000 within 60 days + $8,000 in rent ish. Again none issue I can't prove if they don't have the $ to put up or not. The expenses to do said sample work again I can't prove Ken was able to obtain private finances for this.
Again what will hurt would be the delay attics that have always causes doubt. Honesty is the best policy. To me and I would believe others Ken has a lot to prove with this venture.
I appreciate the news hopefully all that has happened in the past will not happen again.
I guess the biggest question is the 10-13 million if it is worth it. Time will tell. Hopefully big brother is watching the goings on being the past.
JMHO
What's up Tefman...here's the concerns I have with this venture. Way back in 2009 & 2010 this mine was supposed to be the bomb and being bought. From the 2 supposed deals about 80% of the same info was used in both.
The first deal was for 100% broken down to 10 million shares and $250,000 in cash. Now I'm not sure what the price of USA Uranium shares were but I think it it was far more then PIPI @ $0.03! And remember the deal was not to exceed $10 million.
The second deal in 2010 was for 40%, $25,000 plus another $200,000 plus 1,000,000 shares with a price not to exceed $0.49=$4.9 million plus another option of 1 million shares yada yada.
If we see both deals we're talking big bucks no matter how you look at. Take that and the price of gold in 2012 which is much higher then in 2009 and 2010 I would assume it to be quite a bit more.
With an estimated deal value in 2009 & 2010 of $10 million for 100% and $5 million for 40%. I ask why has this property been sitting there for years if it is so great?
And last but not least and the most important question...just how is PIPI @ $0.03 supposed to pay for any such deal with above said numbers? Yes it might be a smaller % but it sure looks like even the owners don't have the money to work the mine.
Do you see what I see?
JMHO
Pete I would find your request of Ken to be impossible for him to do a this time. No one has the ability to foresee what actions JRB would or could do i.e an appeal or whatever. So Ken appeasing you with such in writing will probably not happen. I am not speaking for Ken.
JMHO
Back during the USA Uranium days there was an Ed Minnema posting during the La Dama De Oro mine venture.
Then we see Ed Minnema as Pres. of Secure Runway Systems posting and during that time Secure Runway Systems went for the La Dama De Oro mine.
Does anybody know anymore about the connection? I'm just trying to get as much DD as I can.
GLTA
IMHO
More info...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40795958
USA Uranium Corp.
ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
On August 24th, 2009 the Company entered into a Mineral Claim Option and Purchase Agreement, to option and if warranted purchase a 100% interest in a series of eighteen (18) unpatented mineral mining claims known as the La Dama de Oro property located in Sections 9-11, 14, and 15, Township 6 North, Range 2 West, San Bernadino Meridian, along the southwest flank of Sidewinder Mountain, 15 miles east-northeast of Victorville, California USA from the Burleson Family.
As Consideration for the initial Option to Acquire the La Dama de Oro Property, the Company is required to issue 3,000,000 common shares to the vendor. To exercise the Option to acquire the Property the Company must expend a further $250,000 in exploration of the Property prior to August 24th, 2010 and pay the vendor a further 7,000,000 common shares by that date. Additionally the Company may be required to pay a cash component dependent upon the results of the exploration program and the value of the Company's common shares. The cash and share payments shall not exceed $10,000,000.
So back in 2009 the price was not to exceed $10,000,000 Hmmm
IMHO
Here we go again..
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=50302135
Does anything change? So investors are to believe La Dama De Oro gold mine is so great it has been just sitting there for 2 years. And if we follow another persons post it was somebody else's fault back then? Always somebody else's fault! And back then it took over a year, or we can say it was played for over a year stringing along investors. If you notice the same players are working it back then.
This is the same which went down on another stock. Hmmm... So now this is going to take PIPI to the next level?
IMHO
Here just for you. Have a nice day.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/AboutIRPs.aspx
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/irp_members.aspx
It's normal. None issue.
Just as I thought it was you.
And the first post from the new Ken was that! Same ole Ken! IMHO
Chuck without checking back in old post I thought you were one of the 3 that went out and looked at this property when this was mentioned months ago? Now your saying this is all new? I guess I have to go back and check.
Yes it was nobody else, it was all JRB! Yes, the failure of IDCN was all JRB! It had nothing to do with anybody else just JRB! Absolutely nobody else just JRB! Positively it was only JRB! I'm most certain it was only JRB! I can't think of anybody else just JRB!
IMHO
You can't be saying the IR (who has been around for 10 years) didn't notice JB was diluting the stock?
You can't be saying the IR (who has been around for 10 years) didn't notice that none of the gazillion BS ventures and stories never materialized?
Is that what your saying I'm wrong about?
IMHO
GLTY have a nice day hope Ken is able to get back his $...
The IR was never an officer in the company... I never said he was.
and therefore have nothing to say about the dilution...I never said the IR had anything to do with dilution.
My point when it comes to dilution and the IR or an investor or anybody is...one only had to do a tad of DD and one can see JB has been diluting IDCN for over 10 years. This is and was nothing new with IDCN. When it comes to dilution nobody got duped! Nobody, the IR included.
listening to and spreading the word that JRB told him. WHAT? Look Ken is no fool, and for you to say that you are saying he is.
Bottom line, what you said is hogwash.
One doesn't stand as an IR of a company and or tout and follow a company for years and watch so many BS ventures, LOI, MOA, oil, gold, diamonds, nickel, water, Ilasoft, Emiricle Cream, oil again, spinoffs, buybacks, more spinoffs, more diamonds and say a person was duped. Nobody, the IR included.
Being friends ...has nothing to do with it.
The IR was also instrumental in taking control of the company from Jeff. Never said he wasn't. Still there are questions to be answered.
Unfortunately, the stain and stench of that cockroach has rubbed off on the IR ...you should not say things like that it's just not right.
Future? At this point Ken is only the custodian. The only thing that can put IDCN back on track is a RS and take it down to the amount of shares like the other one. Then all he has is a shell like the other one.
IMHO
GL
Duped? How does one get duped when it comes to the dilution of IDCN over the years. Please feel free to explain?
First I'd like to state some facts.
About 10+ years ago IDCN, around the Issac Harbor days it was 500,000 shares. Then to 500,000,000 around the Garnet days. Then it went to 1 billion during the gold and oil days. Then 3 billion during Grizzly and the diamond days. Then around the 4 billion days it was Ilasoft. 5 and 6 billion it was the Sunray days Then 7 billion it was Bele Mines days.
All this time our friend was involved as either the IR or King of The Hill. As you can see I've shown the facts pertaining to IDCN and the dilution. Now would you please explain how someone who was so close and involved was duped when it came to dilution?
I'm in no way saying he said to JB dilute. Do this or do that. Dilute some more. Now again! Again!
IMHO
And Ken was the one who stood behind him while he did it.
Share?
He sure did share every BS LOI, MOA, stock spinoff as a matter of fact with every venture that went down he shared. Can anybody tell me with who?
IMHO
Now, now Chris lets not dig up old pumps.
It was NOT just the Jeffrey Bruhjell days! It was the Jeffrey Bruhjell & Ken Ash days. Make that years. There is no distorting the FACTS!
So now an investor is to believe that Ken Ash is a new man? That none of the past which he was involved in has any bearing on the future? That one should just disregard all that he posted over the past 10+ years?
Dilution is NOT something new that just happened in the past 2-3 years. Dilution has been part of IDCN for the past 10+ years. FACT!
Okay I'm ready to buy that bridge.
Can be traded through TD only when they get the shares electronically or actual shares. At this point the the stock is in a limbo situation. Until then nothing can be done. Can take up to a few weeks if actual shares are being transferred. Was told one can only keep checking ones account to know.
If one has a TD account you will not be able to trade ANWM/PIPI...
And I know why! :)
Upstatechris I'm glad your here and appreciate all of your post. I totally agree with your last few post. Keep up the good work! IMHO
Now, now there will be no debating, the 1% has now done a 180 and IDCN is the new up and coming stock. Just sit back and watch all the good things that are going to happen with IDCN.
IMHO
Go IDCN!
If there is the (gossip) of a supposed RS what makes IDCN an investment?
If there is still a gazillion shares wouldn't this be a concern for investing in IDCN?
Knowing JB still has a gazillion shares wouldn't this be a big concern for investing in IDCN?
Knowing the only supposed product is some water pitcher, wouldn't this be a big concern for one investing in IDCN?
Being there is no proof JB is really out, wouldn't this be a big concern for one investing in IDCN?
If I'm not mistaking the above has always been issues with on this board so what would be a valid reason for investing in IDCN?