I don't care what anybody says either...except the law of course. Was Gene realy a fugitive? LMFAO

Case MWV103511 Defendant 2287373 NEWTON, GENE - Actions and Minutes

Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type
07/05/2006 MISCELLANEOUS PAYMENT OF $1.00 RECEIVED.
03/21/2006 WARRANT SENT TO SHERIFF'S OFFICE
03/21/2006 WARRANT ORDERED ON 03/21/2006 AT 16:00
03/15/2006 4:00 PM DEPT. R4 EX PARTE HEARING RE: ARREST WARRANT DISPOSED
Minutes
INGRID A UHLER

CLERK IRENE ROMO

DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT.

-

PROCEEDINGS

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF WARRANT OF ARREST FILED.

COURT ORDERS WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED. BAIL SET AT $10000.00. MAY NOT FORFEIT.

-

CUSTODY STATUS

CASE CUSTODY - FUGITIVE

============= MINUTE ORDER END ================



03/13/2006 JURISDICTION SET TO RS BY OTS310.
03/13/2006 COMPLAINT FILED BY BPEAR

What did Gene do with the company (RCC Holdings) that had $15 billion in assets? Did he sell some assets? How come he hasn't paid his rent since 1992? LMFAO

Maybe you can post us a chart with that volume. This chart doesn't show it.

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RCCH&p=D&yr=3&mn=0&dy=0&id=p63815510870

Yes...continuous legal action. LMFAO

I doubt his voicemail is accepting any more messages. As far as Gene Newton living:

"in a real-world legal arena that requires his immediate attention"

I can say this with certainty, Gene Newton has been living in a "real-world legal arena since 1992. That's as far back as the online records will go! lol

About those projected revenues: He did put out a retraction PR...of sorts. [{Vernon-(Gene}-Vernon)] did claim $22 million in projected rev. at 50% net. I don't think he realized that would put him at $11 million in cash assets and force him to file Quarterly Statements. EVERY company that has 10 million in assets MUST file Quarterly's. That is something that never seems to have sunk in around here. Pinks or Not!!

What's the one thing that you can realy nail on Newton? That's the question.

Is Gene still financing operations? thanks for your consistent input here.

another junk stock...LMFAO

another junk stock...LMFAO

So...the IWS can be permitted for a project...and then the GC can go pick up the parts and install it himself and everything will be fine with DEQ? What is it you want me to look up?

Is IWS Water Solutions, Inc. or International Water Solutions Corp. a sole subsidiary of RCCH?

frog, are you stating that IWS's system can be permitted to be installed by the appropriate agencies and the GC can then install the identical system without regards to IWS?

I guess EZEE couldn't pay the rent. Don't we have eyewitness reports of the sheer volume of work being generated in the loan modification business? Colorado SOS has Digital domiciled at 8599 Haven Rancho Cuckoomonga? I thought we was in Monterey Hall? Digital? Randy Newton!!!!!!! Did the Eagle lay an egg? Are we back at 2058 North Mills Ave, Claremont?


http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:AfNWCugrAk8J:www.secinfo.com/d12st4.25.htm+%222058+north+mills+ave%22+RCC&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.digitaldevelopmentsolutions.com/

http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do?masterFileId=20081602056&fileId=20091498758

Indeed. All the materials for the system are readily available. And no, there are no patents to cover its' design. There are design elements, including operation of the valves, floats and general operation, that could be replicated.

That system, once built, would not be ETV verified, nor enjoy a pre-approved status with Montana and Idaho DEQ, and would not be the system that is permitted to be put in the ground at Peak Health and Wellness/Watson's Children Shelter or Homestake Meadows II. The only system going in the ground is the IWS system.

The building permits for Watson's and Homestake would not have been issued without the wastewater issue being resolved first. This is fact.

The nitrate problem in both Missoula and Butte was solved by the IWS system.

These projects could not be moving forward otherwise.

now froggy..

You're reachin' and reachin'... you just can't feel it.

Are you expounding...yes, expounding.. that the IWS system can be permitted and insatalled, without RCC/IWS involvement?

Homestake Meadows II

FWIW IMO the $16,000 per home is to cover the cost of the system. 16,000X58=$928,000


Description
Pristine rural lots 2-10 acres, access to forest Service and common property for recreation, hiking etc., phone and power lines to property,restrictive covenants to protect and enhance property, state of the art environ,entally sound wastewater management system, a $16,000 fee will be charged to each landowner to hook-up to system, Hoem Owners Association will be in place and each landowner will be required to be a memeber and pay fee

http://www.butteidx.com/printable_flyer.php?site_id=585&mls=90988

http://www.ubuildtours.com/tour.php?id=63c5

================================================================

The system planned for Homestake Meadows is a series of treatment tanks that use bacteria to reduce nitrates, similar to a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Individual septic systems were previously proposed and subsequently denied by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality because of nitrate concerns.

This treatment system has received the green light from the DEQ, and Ueland believes it will be the model for future development in the valley south of Butte.

All lots will be served by on-site wells, but waste would be treated at a centralized site before being discharged into a drain field.

"I think this is a major stride forward in showing other developers what can be done," said Dale Mahugh of NorthWestern Energy's economic development office.

Ueland described the system as among the most environmentally friendly on the market, and said it can be expanded to accommodate growth.

"This is where we had to jump out and lead the pack to get this done for the good of Butte," he said.

Homestake lots will be offered for sale from between $36,000 and $75,000.

More than 30 of the 58 lots would be offered at first and Ueland says the remaining property will be on the market in the future.

http://www.mtstandard.com/articles/2009/07/08/area/hjjajcjchgjeef.txt

frog,

you stated:

With wastewater permit in hand, which includes the approved design, the General Contractor can solicit bids from anyone interested in doing the work.

The GC is Mostad Construction. http://www.mostadconstruction.com/page.php?pageid=15

The architect/engineering firm is CTA.http://www.ctagroup.com/sustainability/

CTA has completed many "state of the art" MBR systems. They, nor Mostad, have been granted another permit for the project. The construction permit would not have been granted without a wastewater permit that firstly, addressed the high nitrate levels in the area. Construction is underway.

The approved, permitted design for the project is the IWS system. The GC cannot solicit bids for an alternate system.

The public notice I posted is the only document that is still being made available. The actual permit and environmental assesment, (no longer available) specifically mentions and outlines IWS's system.

This is Mostad's record of the project with the EPA. Montana has been granted authority over this "minor permit".

http://www.epa-echo.gov/cgi-bin/srfecho/cso_usr_echo.cgi

lol


http://www.usahonorsociety.com/profiles/browse.users.php?searchusers=yes&firstname=gene&lastname=newton&address=&city=&state=&zipcode=&country=&designation=&placeofbirth=&marital=&education=&companyname=&title=&marketingarea=&industry=&typeofbusiness=&productsservices=&expertise=&businesswebsite=&personalwebsite=&favbuspub=&favvacaplace=&hobbiessports=&awards=

The wastewater discharge permit was issued in May for the Peak, Watson's project. The variance would not have been granted without the wastewater issue being cleared up. Construction on the project is underway.

But IWS, International Wastewater Systems, is supplementing or offering their system at a reduced rate just sort of for the publicity and the goodwill and good grace of what their doing, so I think they’re pretty much at cost for what they’re doing for the sewer treatment plant. As it turns out, the way the property is, I guess, being offered to Watson’s, there’s some availability of budget to help sewer budget side of things, I guess you’d say, there’s more money available for that side of the budget. And then with the additional development of the…it’s beneficial to the Peak; they can also increase their capacity for treatment, so. By adding this system, you actually get to reduce the drain field area in half. And so I want to move on and kind of keep things moving fast, I’m sure there will be some questions. Let’s go to the next slide real quick.

http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/mcbcc/importmins/2009/Jun10_09/VerbatimTranscript_PeakFitnessTennisFacilityVarianceRequest.pdf

http://www.ravallicounty.mt.gov/commissioners/correspondence/2009/05%20May/05-04%20-%20DEQ%20notice%20of%20intention%20to%20issue%20a%20wastewater%20discharge%20permit%20to%20Peak%20Health%20&%20Wellness.pdf

http://www.missoulian.com/news/article_29c81eef-fb6e-56dc-b5a6-e0b38057a22c.html

What do you base your "judgement" on? And what/who are you judging? Is it RCCH, IWS, Gene? Do you judge these as a whole?

Thanks! I can also provide some potential, projected revenue that RCC was accumulating in the First Quarter of 08!

When that PR was released with RCC's projected revenues, RCC's headquarters was at One Lake Shore Center, Ontario CA. (actual address is 3281 E Guasti Rd)

http://www.ci.ontario.ca.us/index.cfm/40596/48129

Just so happens that Rar2 (property management) also has an office there:

Rar2 Inland Empire Offices California Inc

3281 E Guasti Rd Ste 200
Ontario, CA 91761-7658

It seems that RCC was subletting whatever space they were contracted to lease. (as is evidenced by the suit below and the judgement against "ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS"

FROM THIS I CAN MOST DEFINATELY PROJECT A SCENARIO THAT COULD RESULT IN A POTENTIAL POSITIVE CASH FLOW FOR RCC!



Case UDRS701031 - RAR2 VS RCC HOLDINGS



Viewed Date Action Text Disposition Image
10/02/2008 FEE PAYMENT Not Applicable
09/09/2008 8:00 AM DEPT. R1U ORAP -- EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR - Minutes Pre-D Complete
09/09/2008 8:00 AM DEPT. R1U ORAP -- EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR - Minutes Pre-D Complete
08/05/2008 APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR EXAMINATION FILED. Not Applicable
07/23/2008 APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR EXAMINATION FILED. Not Applicable
07/16/2008 THIRD PARTY ORAP IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): REQUIRES TO ATTACH AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING APPLICATIO N UNDER CCP 491.110 OR 708.120. Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable
06/05/2008 ABSTRACT (X5) RECEIVED. Not Applicable
05/19/2008 CASE SENT TO DEPT R6 FOR SIGNATURE/REVIEW 585 (BACKSPLIT). Not Applicable
05/19/2008 MONEY JUDGMENT AFTER 585 DECLARATION FILED. Not Applicable
05/19/2008 DECLARATION & ORDER RE: ON LIEU OF ORIGINAL (LEASE AGREEMENT) FILED. Not Applicable
05/16/2008 585 RECEIVED. Not Applicable
05/16/2008 DECLARATION RE: REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT UNDER CCP 585D FILED. Not Applicable
05/16/2008 DEFAULT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED. REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT UNDER CCP 585(B), (C) FILED. Not Applicable
11/14/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION RETURNED FROM SB COUNTY. Not Applicable
11/14/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION RETURNED FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COUNTY. Not Applicable
10/23/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION RECEIVED. Not Applicable
10/22/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION ISSUED FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ( FORWARDED TO SCS ON 10/24)
10/22/2007 WRIT FEE OF $15.00 PAID Not Applicable
10/18/2007 8:30 AM DEPT. R11 OSC RE: DISMISSAL (SETTLED) VACATED
10/17/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION RETURNED FROM SB COUNTY. Not Applicable
10/17/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION RETURNED FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COUNTY. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 DEFAULT PACKET RECEIVED Not Applicable
09/19/2007 WRIT OF POSSESSION ISSUED FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ( FORWARDED TO SHERIFF BIN ON 092007)
09/19/2007 WRIT FEE OF $15.00 PAID Not Applicable
09/19/2007 APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF POSSESSION PURSUANT TO CCP712.010 FILED. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 CLERK'S JUDGMENT FOR POSSESSION ENTERED. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 APPLICATION FOR JUDGMENT FOR RESTITUTION OF PREMISES ONLY, PURS. TO C.C.P. 1169. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 DEFAULT ENTERED ON UD COMPLAINT >$25,000 FILED 07/12/2007 OF RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC AS TO RCC HOLDINGS CORP, ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT AND REQUEST FOR CLERK'S JUDGMENT FILED ON RCC HOLDINGS CORP, ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 PROOF OF SERVICE OF PRE JUDGMENT CLAIM; SERVED AS TO ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS ON 07/26/07 WITH FEES OF $116.78. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 ON THE UD COMPLAINT >$25,000 FILED 07/12/2007 OF RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC, ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS IS ADDED AS A DEFT. Not Applicable
09/19/2007 PROOF OF SERVICE BY POSTING ON RCC HOLDINGS CORP; POSTED ON 07/26/07 WITH FEES OF $116.77. Not Applicable
08/31/2007 8:30 AM DEPT. R11 STATUS CONFERENCE -- UNLAWFUL DETAINER - Minutes Continued
07/19/2007 ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR POSTING AND MAILING GRANTED AND FILED. Not Applicable
07/19/2007 APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO POST SUMMONS & COMPLAINT FILED. Not Applicable
07/12/2007 UNLAWFUL DETAINER COMPLAINT >$25,000 FILED. SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED. Not Applicable
07/12/2007 CASE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO DEPARTMENT R11
07/12/2007 UNLAWFUL DETAINER COMPLAINT >$25,000 FILED. SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED. Not Applicable

==============================================================
Case UDRS701031 - RAR2 VS RCC HOLDINGS

Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: UD Complaint >$25,000
Filing Date: 07/12/2007
Complaint Status: Judgment Entered 09/19/2007


Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 PLAINTIFF RAR2-INLAND EMPIREOFFICES-CA,INC RICHARD L SEIDE Multiple Judgments 05/19/2008
2 DEFENDANT RCC HOLDINGS CORP Unrepresented Multiple Judgments 05/19/2008
3 ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS ALL UNKNOWN OCCUPANTS Pro Per Judgment Against 09/19/2007

Unfortunately those links have nothing to do with our EZEE Dept. Solutions. Any idea where EZEE dept. is located now? Not such an ezee question to answer! lol

It is difficult to track. RCC Holdings has changed its' address 6 times in 6 years. hmmmm. Would you like me to post the "unlawful detainer" civil suits, associated?

Interesting that the suit filed in 2003 was finally disposed in 2008. 5 ezee years of not paying your bills...and in the end, have the court and a frustrated plaintiff, settle for an amount "less" than what you actually owe.

Sound ezee?

Peak Health and Wellness Center.

It most certainly would!! Gene said we were getting a $3.50 stock for under a penny. I can't wait!! I'm having trouble keeping these air shares tied down!

Can you give me one legitimate reason that the AS was raised to 10 billion? Was this part of the "plan" to catch the shorts? lmfao

Releasing that information would not be in the Eagle's best interest.

In all the hopeful scenarios professed here...you have to ask yourself...Would it be in the stock's best interest...and its' shareholders, if Newton released the O/S?

The stock is at $0.

There is absolutely no reason Newton shouldn't release that info. to shareholders..and there is absolutely nothing positive he can gain by releasing it.


One thing is certain...RCCH is completely useless to the Eagle. HE CANNOT SELL. WE AS SHAREHOLDERS ARE USELESS TO HIM. AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO SHARE ANY PART OF IWS WITH US.


So, you can "hope" Newton puts out a "management release". I don't beleive we'll see one.

I for one believe IWS will be carved out. There's no point in lugging all this extra baggage, and any legit businessman would have nothing to do with this share structure.

R/S, bankrupt the holding company...take your pick..


JMHO

None of those people know Newton, like I know Newton...lol

Well, that begs the questions...If you're looking to invest in RCC/IWS why would you want to talk to Newton, and why did you invest in RCCH?

Evolu-tech, Dennis Lawson

Manufacturer of ecological water treatment systems for building mechanics and water recycling. A Catalytic Water Treatment (CWT) : « a green building solution »for all HVAC applications and manufacturing processes, such as :Heat Exchangers, Hot Water Boilers, Water Distillers, Commercial Water Heaters, Cooling towers, Plastic Extruders and Molding Equipment, Evaporative Condensers, Metal Extrusion Equipment, Air Washers , Humidifiers, etc.

http://www.environmentaltrademission.org/Participants.php

EVOLU-TECH LTÉE
Boucherville, Quebec Canada Phone Number: (450) 641-4693
Fax Number: (450) 641-4399

Click on Product / Service Type to search for more companies.

Acid Recovery Systems
Boiler Cleaning Equipment
Boiler Feed Water Systems
Boiler/Pressure Vessel Operator and Maintenance Training
Boilers
Chemical Processing Services
Cooling System Filters
Cooling System Flush Kits
Cooling Tower Water Treatment Systems
Fuel System Cleaners
Heat Recovery Systems
Industrial Furnaces
Industrial Furnaces, Other
Wash-Water Recycling Systems
Water
Water Analysis Systems
Water Softening Equipment
Water Testing Equipment
Water Treatment Chemicals
Water Treatment Equipment
Well Stimulation Equipment
Well Stimulation Services

EVOLU-TECH LTÉE

http://www.wand.com/core/companyTypes.aspx?mfgcode=50078859&Info=EVOLU-TECH+LT%c3%89E

http://www.wand.com/core/searchcompanies.aspx?smfgname=&sfrom=&stype=3180729&sHarm=&SrchType=C&pageno=&RGID=143&RFQ_mode=

================================================================

Evolu-Tech
Fuelcat
Diesel catalyst based on permanent magnets

http://community.intellicontact.com/p/provenfuel/newsletters/intro/posts/ethos-env-corp-press-release-non-profit-r-d-test-confirms-ethos-fr-reduces-emiss
================================================================
Energotest '08 Results Released

Evolu-Tech: Fuelcat5, a device that induces a magnetic field and aims to reduce fuel consumption. Result: -1.3%.

http://www.trucknews.com/issues/ISArticle.asp?aid=1000327281&pc=TN&ref=rss#


Energotest 2008 – PIT (Project Innovation Transport) Transportation Companies Are Testing New Technologies to Reduce Fuel Consumption

PRESS RELEASE
For immediate release

POINTE-CLAIRE, 29 September 2008 – The second installment of the Energotest 2008 trials took place from 2 to 12 September 2008 at the Motor Vehicle Test Centre at Blainville, Quebec. Energotest 2008 brought together fleets from SLH, Bison, Hervé Lemieux, Bourassa, Robert, and the SAQ to test a dozen technologies designed to reduce fuel consumption and the emissions of greenhouse-effect gases produced during road transportation.

Organized by FPInnovations — Feric Division, in collaboration with Quebec's Ministère des Transports, Quebec's Agence de l’Efficacité Énergétique, Transport Canada, and Natural Resources Canada, the Energotest program has provided reliable information on the performance of 12 technologies and a range of practices chosen by the members of PIT. In addition to these technologies (described below), both PIT members and others can learn the impact on fuel consumption of hauling containers, a panel trailer, or a trailer with an open bed; whether it's beneficial to add fairings (skirts) to a vehicle; and the impact of biodiesel on vehicle performance, to name just a few examples.

Supplier
Product
Description

Aero Industries
Aerotail
Trailer wind deflector

AirFlow Déflecteur
Déflecteur AirFlow
Air deflector for trailer axles

Continental Tires
Continental Tires
Energy-efficient tires

éco6 Inc.
C2 Carbon combustion
Combustion optimizer

Econoco Inc.
Econopro
Fuel processor based on electromagnetic fuel separation

Evolu-Tech
Fuelcat
Diesel catalyst based on permanent magnets

Freight Wing
Freight Wing Belly Fairing
Trailer skirt

Grand Rock
QP Muffler and HF Muffler
Muffler

Manac
Econair AFS (t)
Trailer skirts

NM Engineered Solutions
Fireball XMC Exhaust Manifold Coating
Exhaust manifold and turbocharger

Performance Energy Group
Ethos FR
Diesel fuel additive

Transtex Composite
MFS
Trailer skirt


An open-doors day took place Wednesday 9 September, and more than 50 visitors had the opportunity to see how the tests were carried out, to talk to suppliers, and to share their thoughts with industry leaders and researchers.

"The cost of fuel and related environmental challenges are forcing managers to seek technologies capable of improving the energy efficiency of their fleets if they want to stay in business," emphasized Yves Provencher, Director of Business Development for FPInnovations — Feric Division. "The research program that just finished gave us an opportunity for the second consecutive year to offer the transportation industry concrete solutions capable of reducing their fuel consumption and increasing their competitiveness."

An overview of the results will be presented during a press conference scheduled for early November. A detailed report on the program's results will be available shortly to PIT Members. For more information on the PIT program, please visit the program's Website www.feric.ca/PIT-en.

About the PIT program PIT (Project Innovation Transport) gathers together managers of truck fleets who are interested in improving the energy efficiency of their transportation operations. PIT members benefit from the expertise of experienced researchers capable of helping them develop and implement innovative solutions. This partnership is funded by the federal and provincial governments.

About FPInnovations — Feric Division Feric is a division of FPInnovations, a non-profit research organization. FPInnovations is a world leader in the development of scientific solutions to support the global competitiveness of the Canadian forest industry and to respond to the research priorities of its industry and government members. Feric develops and helps implement safe, innovative solutions capable of giving its members a long-term competitive advantage, adding value to their fiber supply, and encouraging the use of sustainable forestry practices. Feric specializes in research related to transportation, road construction, wood harvesting, and silviculture, as well as in operations related to the management of forest fires.

To learn more about Energotest 2008, visit the program's Web site, www.feric.ca/energotest2008-en.



================================================================
page 40

http://www.transportroutier.ca/images/TR-Oct-09.pdf

================================================================

US Patent Application 20080264607 - Water treatment
Application Filed on April 18, 2008
Application Published on October 30, 2008

Inventor
Hebert, Claude L.


http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20080264607/fulltext.html

================================================================

US Patent 6936172 - Catalytic treatment of hard water in a reverse osmosis system

US Patent Issued on August 30, 2005
Estimated Patent Expiration Date: January 24, 2023

Inventor
Hebert, Claude L.


http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6936172/fulltext.html

================================================================

US Patent 5149438 - Method for magnetically treating water in a closed loop heat transfer system

US Patent Issued on September 22, 1992
Estimated Patent Expiration Date: June 11, 2011

Inventor
Hebert, Claude L.


http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5149438/fulltext.html

very astute observation...

you stated:

RCCH has been Diluting to stay alive ??? ROFLMAO. Yep must be all those "0" to $100.00 a day big time dilution going on. I guess RCCH has been opening up and maintaining offices all over the globe on that kind of money LOL.

yes...with a click of the mouse and $75...lol



Peachtree
191 Peachtree Street
Suite 3300
Atlanta, GA 30303

virtual offices starting at $75/month.

http://www.synergyworkplaces.com/location/PEA

=========================================================

Costs to Virtual Tenants
Virtual tenants are charged $150 per month. They are also charged a minimal overhead charge to hire NYU-Poly student interns on an hourly basis.

http://www.poly.edu/business/incubators/best/companies

=============================================================

1250 Rene Levesque Blvd W, Suite 2200

http://www.moveandstay.com/montreal/offices_description.asp?id=10863&tab_id=3&#Virtual_Office

=============================================================

RCC International Wastewater Systems Inc

Montana (Northwest Region)
Metals Bank Building
8 W. Park St.
Suite 404A
Butte, Mt 59701

http://www.rcciws.com/index-7.html

=============================================================
Ueland Family Purchases
Metals Bank Building

http://www.buttemontana.org/Newsletters/March%202007.pdf

===========================================================

Big subdivision moving forward
By Justin Post - 07/07/2009

A Butte family announced plans Tuesday to move ahead with Butte's first major sub-division serviced by an independent wastewater treatment plant.

"We're officially announcing that we're going forward," Ron Ueland told real estate agents and representatives of NorthWestern Energy and Dowl HKM Engineering Tuesday during a presentation at Metal's Bank restaurant.

Ueland Land Development of Butte plans to create and sell 58 home sites from 2 to 10 acres over 240 acres north of Warren Heights at Blacktail Canyon Road, south of Butte.

Known as the Homestake Meadows Phase 2 major sub-division, the development is among the largest proposed in Butte and is unlike any other with the construction of a community wastewater treatment system operating independently of Butte-Silver Bow infrastructure.

The proposal, along with other development south of Butte, had been delayed over high nitrate readings from septic tanks.

The system planned for Homestake Meadows is a series of treatment tanks that use bacteria to reduce nitrates, similar to a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Individual septic systems were previously proposed and subsequently denied by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality because of nitrate concerns.

This treatment system has received the green light from the DEQ, and Ueland believes it will be the model for future development in the valley south of Butte.

All lots will be served by on-site wells, but waste would be treated at a centralized site before being discharged into a drain field.

"I think this is a major stride forward in showing other developers what can be done," said Dale Mahugh of NorthWestern Energy's economic development office.

Ueland described the system as among the most environmentally friendly on the market, and said it can be expanded to accommodate growth.

"This is where we had to jump out and lead the pack to get this done for the good of Butte," he said.

Homestake lots will be offered for sale from between $36,000 and $75,000.

More than 30 of the 58 lots would be offered at first and Ueland says the remaining property will be on the market in the future.

While one of the proposed routes for the proposed Mountain States Transmission Intertie, or MSTI, passes through the development, Ueland doesn't believe it will be the chosen route.

Still, he's withholding sale of the property where the line would run until a final decision is reached for the 500-kilovolt MSTI line.

If the line does pass through the land, Ueland said it would be placed in an existing utility corridor where power lines already are located.

Ueland said the property is former ranch land and admits there was uncertainty within the family whether to sell the property.

But with growth in south Butte, he says the property can't be used for ranching operations anymore, and said the new homes will benefit the area.

"Butte can't wait for this," Ueland said. "If we're going to keep pace with what the community needs, we need to do it now." — Reporter Justin Post may be reached at justin.post@lee.net.

http://www.mtstandard.com/articles/2009/07/08/area/hjjajcjchgjeef.txt

=============================================================

Metals Sports Bar & Grill
based on 1 review
Category: American (Traditional) [Edit]

8 W Park St
Butte, MT 59707

(406) 782-5534

http://www.yelp.com/biz/metals-sports-bar-and-grill-butte

=============================================================

I can see how it would be very upsetting if one wanted to give away $10 million dollars and they couldn't find the phone number of the person they wanted to give it to.

LMAO

You sat on the bid for 4 weeks, and claim to hold 100 million shares....and now...you're getting upset?

Did you do any DD before you put in your order or during that 4 week period? lol

You claim you can provide a clean shell with $10 million in financing...

Why don't you put your proposal together and send it to Newton?

Your last post you were talking about energy drinks...I think Gene might have some ideas for you. lol

Do you need his email address or is that too much DD to ask of you?

LOL

You think they're on file now? lol

froggy, I think you just made a very good case as to why that PR released by RCC Holdings was retracted and clarified. Does the retraction then keep the company in compliance?

you stated:

The original letter speaks of Newton making claims about the uplist being in the hands of the TSX, it also reports the email about the congratulations from the Exchange. Both of those announcements would violate the Exchange Requirements IF there was an application in process.

from Exchange:

We advise that the Company or RCC International Wastewater Systems have never been listed on the Exchange nor have they been listed on the TSX.

Of course they haven't been. It would be an entirely new entity. In keeping with their strict confidentiality policy, they most certainly would not divulge that an application had been submitted by a CPC to merge RCC/IWS.

We have concluded that the issues brought forward is are civil matters that fall outside of the jurisdiction of the Exchange.

They most certainly are. All of gpwild's grievances would be considered "civil matters".

IMO This doesn't look like a blanket statement sent out by the exchange, simply stating confidentiality. It seems gpwild's email was sent up and reviewed by an attorney. Why would they bother to review for a breach of Exchange Requirements if there was absolutely no connection b/w the TSX-V and RCC. Why would the Exchange even consider a future investigation?

We advise that the Compliance & Disclosure Department of the Exchange has reviewed and considered the issues you have brought forward to determine if there has been a breach of Exchange Requirements.

How can there be a breach of Exchange Requirements? and why would they state this if RCC hadn't submitted an application?

We advise that the Company or RCC International Wastewater Systems have never been listed on the Exchange nor have they been listed on the TSX.

To me this reads like "the exchange is in no way lible or complicit in your allegations"

We have concluded that the issues brought forward is are civil matters that fall outside of the jurisdiction of the Exchange. You may wish to retain legal counsel to advise you on possible actions and remedies that may be available to you.

see above

Due to our strict confidentiality guidelines we are not at liberty to disclose any information regarding any review or investigation that we undertake.

understandable


As a result, you will likely hear nothing further from us on this matter.

understandable

We will correspond directly with the Company should we decide to proceed with a formal review of this matter.

should we decide

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

ALL IMO The response certainly looks like it was written by an attorney. I doubt you would have received a response if there wasn't an application at the exchange. FWIW

Says right there in the "pre-clarified" PR how the exchange and the attorney were involved.

RCC Announces Key Board and Financial Positions
Fri Jan 30, 10:02 AM
Email Story IM Story Printable View
KISSIMMEE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--RCC/IWS (Pink Sheets: RCCH) is pleased to announce its Board of Directors and Chief Financial Officer in preparation for its new International Exchange up listing. Added to the Board of Directors are:

Mr. Archie Thompson, Resident of Canada and Board Member. With many years of worldwide entrepreneurial experience in many countries, Mr. Thompson will advise the company on international projects and will help with Business development helping to bring Canadian companies to the international market through RCC/IWS channels.

Mr. Pierre Morin, Resident of Canada and Board Member. Pierre combines many years of formal Canadian Government experience with entrepreneurial business endeavors. Mr. Morin will serve on the Board of Directors as well as take on the role of Chief Country officer for Canada.

Mr. Bill Hess, Resident of Canada and Board Member. Mr. Hess is former President of the Toronto Stock Exchange and will advise the company on key financial matters as it grows and develops.

Mr. David Campbell, Resident of The U.S., and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Campbell holds many years of broad financial experience from some of the largest banks in the U.S. His special expertise in financial systems and valuing Intellectual Property will be important to the proper and orderly financial growth of the company.

Work continues on the new market segments that RCC/IWS is pursuing, both in the “Green” home division, which is building its supplier network in Idaho, and the Commercial Energy division that will be formally kicked off in New York City in March 2009. Work began on the Commercial Energy division in October 2008, analyzing its feasibility and business viability, and the company believes it is now at a point where it is ready for commercial sales. Interviews occurred this week with companies who will help the marketing of these products as well as wastewater and water systems. These relationships will expand the RCC/IWS coverage to several Southeastern States including Georgia, Alabama and Texas.

RCC Holdings' transition team is very pleased on how smooth the transition to the International Exchange has been proceeding and would like to thank the Exchange and the attorneys involved for all of their help and support.

Dad, The first paragraph identifies RCC Holdings as the "Company"

We confirm receipt of your e-mail dated October 25, 2009 that was forwarded the Compliance & Disclosure Department of TSX Venture Exchange (the "Exchange") on October 29, 2009 regarding your concerns with respect to RCC Holdings ( the "Company").

What exactly are the issues you raised? thanks