Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ah yes, that favored tactic of the left.
................al
Democrats are pounding the table
By Bill Hansmann
There is an old expression among trial attorneys: If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law on your side, pound the table. Pounding the table is exactly what the Democrats are doing at this stage of the 2024 presidential race.
If they were to claim they had the facts on their side, they would have to insist that Joe Biden’s term as president was more successful than the term of Donald Trump’s presidency, or at least as successful but without the drama. That set of “facts” doesn’t play on Main Street, Wall Street, or any other avenue or boulevard you would care to mention.
If they were to claim they had the law on their side, they would have to produce one genuine legal scholar, not a Soros-bought-and-paid-for D.A., to go to bat for Alvin Bragg’s show trial/witch hunt. When genuine legal scholars such as lifelong Democrat Alan Dershowitz proclaim the Manhattan Trump conviction a sham and a disgrace, well, then any sane person would see that the law is not on their side, either.
So the Democrats are pounding the table. They think that just perhaps if they insist loudly enough and often enough that re-electing Donald Trump will end democracy and establish a dictatorship in America with Trump our leader for life, well, maybe enough people will buy that nonsense to tip the scales in Biden’s favor. But I see that yellow liquid running down my leg, and it isn’t rain.
My fear for some time has been the creation by the Democrats of a new pandemic scare, once again allowing vote-harvesting and massive mail-in fraud. But that fear is lessening as the truth about the COVID panic has come to light.
So it would appear that so far, pounding of any sort has not improved the Democrats’ chances of returning a demented old man to the Oval Office for another term. My suggestion to them, therefore, would be to go pound sand.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/democrats_are_pounding_the_table.html
The dangers of arguing with a leftist
By Robert Arvay
The reality is that the left is wrong on just about every issue, from the economy to the military, from law enforcement to transgenderism, from women’s reproductive rights to climate change — and, in short, every major disagreement they have with conservatives. Not only are leftists wrong, but they are immune to persuasion by facts and reason. They even dispute the math, calling it racist.
More lawfare: Flooding courts with bogus complaints when a judge makes a decision that in any way benefits President Trump
By Olivia Murray
Trump’s poll numbers are soaring in every swing state—so all they have left are the stinky, cheap tactics of political dysfunctionaries.
First planned terror attack at 2024 Olympic foiled by authorities
By Olivia Murray
We’re roughly two months out from the 2024 Olympics, and authorities have already foiled the first planned terrorist attack. Here’s the story, from Amy Mek at RAIR Foundation:
A planned Islamic terrorist attack targeting the Geoffroy-Guichard Stadium in Saint-Étienne during the upcoming Paris 2024 Olympics has been successfully foiled. Rokhman B., an 18-year-old Chechen asylum seeker, was arrested for his involvement in plotting the Islamic attack. In contact with ISIS fighters, he aimed to kill ‘disbelievers.’
Surprise! He’s a Muslim. But, there’s more: “Previously unknown to authorities, Rokhman B. and his family arrived in France as asylum seekers in 2023.”
Oh, so not only is he a Muslim, but he’s a Muslim migrant. Again, not the least bit surprising.
As Mek reported, Rokhman B. tried to claim that his alleged role in the terrorist attack was merely “tough talk” and nothing more… despite the fact that he’d actually been communicating with members of Daesh (Islamic State), and authorities discovered pictures and videos of the targeted venue on his electronic devices.
Tough talk? Is that kind of how raping children gets excused as a “cultural difference” that requires “sensitivity training” rather than a criminal act that necessitates severe, and permanent punishment? Or, raping an “attractive” woman isn’t “wrong” because it’s only a “natural” expression of sexual desire?
Migrant Rapist to Judge: 'Her Legs Were Bare, Any Man Would Have Done Like Me'
Egyptian rapist did not show any remorse...After all, if a woman is “attractive” & “provocative,” why should it be wrong to take her with violence questioned the migrant
Video https://t.co/quN26DvLa2
— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) June 4, 2021
“Any man would have done like me,” he says!
No Muhammad, they wouldn’t. (I don’t actually know his name, but odds are I’m probably right.) Sure, any man from your backward culture and barbaric 7th century value system, but not one rooted in the morality of men respecting and protecting women, and exercising self-control and self-restraint.
As Mek iterates, “the incident serves as another reminder of the persistent jihadist threat in France.” To this I must add that the incident serves as a prescient warning to the “persistent jihadist threat” in the United States as well. How many men like Rokhman B. do we have lurking here, below the radar too? Thank a Democrat.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/first_planned_terror_attack_at_2024_olympic_foiled_by_authorities.html
After bankrolling illegals, FEMA says it will run out of cash for hurricane season
By Monica Showalter
FEMA is a federal agency paid for by American taxpayers to support Americans in times of disaster they have no control over. Illegals have no claim on this money and the feds have no right to spend it. They seem to think it's their money, and they're using it to pay for Democrat policy aims of importing voters to pad congressional districts as well as replace the electorate with indigents who will always be loyal to them.
Three years late, Biden suddenly announces he's swinging the barn door shut a tad to illegal migrants
By Monica Showalter
In all, it's nothing but a cynical move to appear to be doing something about the border without actually enforcing border law as the Constitution requires for election season consumption.
Some 11 million illegals have already crossed in. They're commiting crimes, they're out stealing, raping and killing and Biden and his fellow Democrats won't do a thing to stop them. They're padding welfare rolls, filling parks and rec centers and airports, and flooding schools and emergency rooms. They're occupying about a quarter of New York's hotel rooms and driving up housing, water and electricity costs in California, not to mention, keeping the market illiquid as homeowners in fire zones can no longer insure their homes from alien-set wildfires
Washington Post-ies get lesson in cash flow
By Silvio Canto, Jr.
Do you need anymore information to appreciate just how out of touch with reality these people are? I guess that they are more interested in "identity politics" than the economic viability of the organization.
The real threat to democracy
By Ronald C. Tinnell
Democrats are famous for claiming their adversaries are doing whatever malign actions they are guilty of themselves. This is just one more example. They are the real threat to democracy.
Biden’s border ‘crackdown’ is a con job based on another Biden bait-and-switch
By Andrea Widburg
On January 20, 2021, as one of his first acts in office, Biden revoked Trump’s executive order. He then proceeded to open the border. He stopped work on a wall that would channel true asylum seekers to specific entries, he stopped all deportations, he ended the “remain in Mexico” policy, he stopped detaining illegal aliens captured as they crossed the border, he shipped illegal aliens across America, he granted amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens, and he generally refused to enforce any American immigration laws.
The last choirboy in American politics?
By Tom Harvey
Here in Ohio, Republican Governor Mike DeWine recently called for a special session of the Republican-controlled legislature and pushed through a bill that would permit the Democrat’s presidential candidate, Joe Biden, to appear on the November presidential ballot.
Meanwhile in New York City the Biden/Garland/Bragg/ Merchan team pushed through a novel case that twisted an alleged misdemeanor into a felony conviction, a felony no one has yet been able to precisely identify, all to besmirch and sideline Donald Trump, the likely Republican presidential nominee. Ironically this jurisdiction has devoted most of its energies recently into transforming felonies into misdemeanors, speeding miscreants’ return to the streets.
In the aftermath of this bold use of judicial power to damage Donald Trump does anyone believe that Democrat governors Newsome or Hochul would ever call their respective state legislators to special sessions to ensure that Donald Trump’s name would be on their November ballots?
Sadly, a new page has been turned in American politics where party leaders will likely not first consider what they should do. They will be comfortable resorting to what they can do, in order to inflict the most damage on their opponents.
Our Constitution was written with a clear appreciation of human nature, that is the natural drift toward tyranny that can accompany an unrestrained quest for more power.
I don’t wish to exalt Mike DeWine on every policy decision. He’s made some that were, frankly foolish. But in this case, he’s reverted to an old-style politician who first thinks about what’s right, who may be disappearing from American politics, and he may well be the last choirboy.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/the_last_choirboy_in_american_politics.html
Trump gave America energy independence—and Biden took it away
By Joseph Ford Cotto
While you surely have heard much about his political prosecution in Manhattan, the very real facts of Trump’s presidency go almost totally ignored by the mainstream media. Funny how that works. No less funny is how the establishment press pays zero attention to the fact that President Joe Biden squandered the energy independence President Trump won for America.
An Out-of-Control Administrative State Turns a Parking Lot into a Mine
By Janet Levy
For too long, bureaucrats, unelected and unaccountable to the people, have operated outside the restraints of the democratic process, willfully plying the interests of pressure groups and working to further political agendas. They must be checked.
The Biden Disaster for Democrats, and the Cataclysmic Political Realignment of Young Voters
By William Sullivan
None of this is rocket science, and while both parties are responsible for these circumstances to some extent, young people wanting to launch their careers and lives are undoubtedly beginning to long for the days when the economy was unmistakably stronger before the pandemic, and when a senile old man wasn’t telling them that all of their problems would be solved if he’s able to unconstitutionally take money from the plumbers and truck drivers among them to pay off a small portion of the loans taken out by the college students among them.
Trump the Citizen
By Matthew G. Andersson
The world continues to be riveted by President Trump’s legal cases. It is easy to sit back and watch it all, and think that this happens only in the gamesmanship of Washington politics. Unfortunately, what the nation is witnessing happens every day, in some way, all across the country, deliberately, by mistake or mismanagement, from local county circuit courts, all the way up to state supreme courts and beyond, in ways big and small. (Federal circuit judge Richard Posner, nominated by President Reagan, said he eventually resigned over the way many litigants were treated in the court system.)
The legal machinery of our justice system, combined with detailed rules of procedure, generally keeps a lid on the corruption becoming absolute, or unable to be challenged and corrected. That’s a good thing. But the dangerous part, as in all human institutions, comes from the people in that system and how the legal machinery can be “hijacked” or taken far off course simply by ideology.
The “Bar and Bench,” or the lawyers and the judges, and the prosecutors, have a tight lock, or monopoly, on the courts that they rule over. Unknown to most of the public, however, is that the attorneys are officially “Officers of the Court,” which means they have a formal, regulatory “duty” to uphold the integrity of the law, and the court system, above any other role they may play. This includes a mandate by the Bar association to instill public confidence in our laws and legal system through their right behavior and professional conduct.
This all sounds good, and such standards do contribute to making our legal system often one of the best in the world. But it can still be easily corrupted and compromised, because politics and special interests can, without much trouble, penetrate the Judiciary and the Bar. It’s also because judges are indeed “merely human,” and their legal reasoning is really not at all different from everyday thinking, which means that it is full of personal beliefs, bias, emotion, interests, suggestion, and wishful thinking. Judges are also government employees, and that means that a strict government hierarchy of authority, incentives, and influence is always present.
One of the best books ever written on the American legal system is Courts on Trial. It was published in 1949 by Jerome Frank. Like Trump, he was a New York City native. Frank was a working commercial lawyer for nearly 20 years in Chicago, then a federal judge, law professor, and chairman of the SEC. The focus of his book is the nation’s trial courts, where their primary responsibility is fact-finding. In this, according to Frank, they usually fail, contrary to our assumptions.
Frank’s fundamental criticism is that our court system operates in a closed manner, with its own, effectively private, rules and understandings. It often consists of a casual, colluding culture of lawyers and judges, with the public standing outside it: intimidated, uniformed, and uninvolved, which is apparently how the courts and lawyers would like it to remain.
So what the American public is seeing in President Trump’s courtroom difficulties is not something that happens just to him. It isn’t an exception; it is merely an expansion and enlargement of the corruption and failures that are already latent within our legal institutions. It only took a little more influence to nudge some courts into acting as pure political weapons.
This brings me to the central point that I’d like to make: President Trump has stated on the record that he is fighting for individual rights, and for our Constitution, and for a constitutional form of government. Such a government doesn’t just happen on its own; our rights are not on “autopilot.” You have to be part of the constitutional order, as an individual, and you have to stand up, and be an advocate for your individual role in that order, even, or especially, in the legal system itself. George Bernard Shaw put it this way: “I say that a man’s first duty is to learn to fight. If he can’t do that, he can’t set an example; he can’t stand up for his own rights, or his neighbors’.”
Trump was just down in the “boiler room” of law — in a trial court with a judge and a jury, and a national public audience. That is the true public law forum going back to ancient Greece. In the big cities and suburbs that most of us now live in, however, that vital “public square” and res publica, one where we used to interact more in person, can be easily abandoned in our private lives, and now in our digital world. Trump breaks through this mirage and illusion and helps to “shock” the passive public square back to life.
He is showing everyone what legal reform takes: citizen involvement, resolve, and perseverance — and fighting the good fight through your own power of personality.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/06/trump_the_citizen.html
Biden’s Border Policy – Beyond the Soundbites
The president’s executive order might not do what the headlines suggest.
by Mark Angelides | Jun 5, 2024
With illegal immigration either topping the polls or coming in a close second on the list of voter concerns this election cycle, President Joe Biden has done what most long-serving politicians tend to do when the issue is against them: the bare minimum to generate a headline. Such is the case with the current president’s executive action on the border, released Tuesday, June 4. After drumming up significant media coverage, with speculation driven by “sources,” what does Biden’s response to public anger change?
Bold Border Claims
“Since his first day in office, President Biden has called on Congress to secure our border and address our broken immigration system. Over the past three years, while Congress has failed to act, the President has acted to secure our border,” the White House fact sheet reads. Such a declaration may surprise Americans who watched as more than 60 initiatives were taken by the administration to “secure” the border, each followed by an increase in illegal crossings.
Yet, it is not the posturing as the “border president” that really defines the latest executive order; it is the fact that it doesn’t do very much at all. The very first tenet of the order is that it will: “Bar Migrants Who Cross the Southern Border Unlawfully From Receiving Asylum.”
Surely that is a plain-as-day policy that those concerned about illegal immigration can get behind? Well, perhaps it would be if it weren’t mitigated by the three paragraphs that followed it.
When Is Illegal Illegal?
“President Biden issued a proclamation under Immigration and Nationality Act sections 212(f) and 215(a) suspending entry of noncitizens who cross the Southern border into the United States unlawfully. This proclamation is accompanied by an interim final rule from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security that restricts asylum for those noncitizens.”
A plain reading so far would suggest that those who break the law by entering the country illegally will be barred from claiming asylum — and that may be true if it weren’t for the caveats:
“These actions will be in effect when the Southern border is overwhelmed.
“They will be discontinued when the number of migrants who cross the border between ports of entry is low enough for America’s system to safely and effectively manage border operations.”
The fact sheet seems to be saying that illegality here occurs only when a certain number of illegal crossings take place. Indeed, multiple media outlets that have spoken with senior administration officials say the same thing: This will apply only when a seven-day average of more than 2,500 illegal crossings per day occurs – meaning that every week, at least 17,500 illegal migrants could be permitted into the US interior before agents seek to prevent further crossings. That’s almost one million a year (910,000). The block will be lifted once that figure drops to 1,500 per day.
Of course, this figure does not include those who are known as “gotaways” – people who do not stop to register with agents when they cross the order. But again, the further you dig, the more you find.
Once the 2,500 crossers threshold is reached, border officials will stop carrying out “credible fear” interviews. And yet, according to The Hill, “there will be exceptions.” These exceptions include unaccompanied minors and – pay attention now – those who display a credible fear of returning to their country. So, in reality, any individual who expresses the notion that they will be persecuted upon return to their country will be permitted entry.
And then comes the most resounding element. As The Los Angeles Times puts it, “The restrictions would not apply to those who enter at official ports of entry or use other legal means, including those who use a relatively new mobile app to request an appointment.” So, in fact, this Executive Action only applies to those who cross the border away from regular ports of entry.
Unpopular Opinion?
The president is keen to be seen to be doing something on illegal immigration and the porous southern border – even if actually doing something would be an even easier lift. One might assume that the only objections from within his party were from those who do not want entry to the United States limited at all. And yet, this is a particularly polarizing political season, and seats are won or lost on coattails.
“Several Democrats in competitive Senate races have declined President Biden’s invitation to join him [June 4] at the White House when he announces drastic new action meant to crack down on illegal border crossings,” Axios reported. “Lawmakers in swing states have pushed for stricter border rules, but some may keep the president at arm’s length as they consistently poll better than him in their states,” the site detailed. The reporting continued:
“The White House invited all Democratic senators to join Biden at an event announcing the new executive actions. But at least Sens. Jon Tester (D-MT), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Bob Casey (D-PA) – all of whom are seeking re-election in battleground states – will not attend. Some cited scheduling conflicts.”
And it’s not just lawmakers who are irked at the president.
Within minutes of Biden announcing the policy, the ACLU reared its head, stating, “We intend to sue.” ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt said, “An asylum ban was illegal under Trump and is just as illegal now.” And it will likely not be the only organization looking to sue. How many illegal border crossers – including those with a genuine claim to asylum – will be denied entry because they were the 2,501st in line? Litigating for the “newcomers” is big business – a business that is well-funded and unafraid of tackling the federal government.
But does it matter if President Biden’s orders are stopped before they even get started?
The content of these plans suggests that limiting the number of individuals making an illegal crossing is far from the goal. Mr. Biden can now announce to all the media that he is trying to fix the border but is being blocked at every turn by Republicans in Congress or NGOs in the courts. Whether the public will see this as anything more than a fig leaf to cover political embarrassment will be determined in November.
https://www.libertynation.com/bidens-border-policy-beyond-the-soundbites/
GM Gmenfan-
If the races were reversed it would be all over the fake news for at least a week.
...........................al
BREAKING: Arizona GOP Files BOMBSHELL Lawsuit Against Corrupt Secretary of State After Discovering from 500,000 to 1.3 Million ILLEGAL Voters on State’s Voter Rolls
by Jim Hoft Jun. 4, 2024 4:40 pm
az-nvra-complaint-filed-5-31-24
This is how Democrats win.
This is how Democrats cheat.
This is what must be addressed by Republican groups across the country!
Thank you Arizona Republican Party for showing the rest of America what must be done to bring back election integrity in America today.
The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the corrupt Secretary of State Adrian Fontes after discovering from 500,000 to 1.3 million ILLEGAL VOTERS on the state’s voter rolls.
George Behizy reported:
BREAKING: The Arizona Republican party has filed a BOMBSHELL lawsuit against the Secretary of State for violations of the National Voter Registration Act after discovering between 500,000 to 1.3 Million ILLEGAL voters on the voter rolls, including dead people & nonresidents
“The lawsuit highlights outrageous voter registration rates, with some counties exceeding 100% of eligible voters. The lawsuit uncovered that Arizona has between 500,000 to 1,270,000 unaccounted-for voters on the rolls, including deceased individuals and those who have moved away.”
“Our findings reveal a staggering number of counties with more registered voters than eligible citizens, this is a clear indication of a system in disarray. We are holding Adrian Fontes accountable to ensure fair and credible elections in Arizona.”
This exactly how Democrats cheat, bloated voter rolls combined with universal mail in ballots. Republicans have to get ahead of this before November 5th.
Arizona is part of the ERIC System.
States on the ERIC System. From 32 to 23 since the 2020 election.
From the lawsuit, pages 2 and 3:
Arizona has at least 500,000 registered voters on the voter rolls who should have otherwise been removed. In other words, at least 500,000 registered voters currently listed on the Secretary’s voter rolls
for Arizona are deceased or no longer reside in Arizona.
And a review of other reliable data sources shows that Arizona has between 1,060,000 and 1,270,000 unaccounted-for voters on the state voter rolls.
Arizona Free Enterprise Club reported:
Late last week, Scot Mussi, the President of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona over the State’s failure to comply with Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the officials lists of eligible voters by reason of … (A) the death of the registrant; or (B) a change in the residence of the registrant” to maintain accurate voter-registration records in a uniform manner across the state.
“Election integrity is a serious issue in our nation,” said Mussi. “Ensuring that Arizonans can have faith in the integrity of our election system and representative government starts with clean voter rolls that leave no doubts about who is able to cast a ballot. That’s why we sent a prelitigation notice to Secretary Fontes last August highlighting the artificially high voter registration rates. Unfortunately, most Arizona counties continue to have voter registration rates far exceeding the national average. We hope that the court compels Secretary Fontes to comply with his obligations under the NVRA to clean up Arizona’s voter rolls.”
Joining Mussi as Plaintiffs in this challenge are the Chair of the Republican Party of Arizona, Gina Swoboda, and Steven Gaynor.
In their lawsuit, the Plaintiffs argue that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes has failed to perform his mandatory list maintenance duty under the NVRA. For example, the most recent voter registration and census data show that up to four Arizona counties – Apache, La Paz, Navajo, and Santa Cruz – have more registered voters than eligible citizens. The remaining counties across the state have implausibly high voter registration rates that far exceed the average national and statewide voter-registration rates in recent years. Consistent with these artificially high registration rates, the complaint alleges that Arizona has at least 500,000 registered voters on the rolls who should have otherwise been removed because they are deceased or no longer reside in Arizona.
The Plaintiffs ask the federal court to find that Secretary Fontes is in violation of Section 8 of the NVRA, and to require the Secretary to fully comply with any existing procedures Arizona has in place to ensure ineligible voters are identified and removed from the rolls.
Here is a copy of the lawsuit.
PDF at link
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-arizona-gop-files-bombshell-lawsuit-against-corrupt/
American Voters Looking Forward To Choosing Between Convicted Felon And Unconvicted Felon
U.S. — With presidential candidate Donald Trump now convicted of 34 felony charges, American voters are looking forward to choosing between a convicted felon and an unconvicted felon at the polls this November.
"I mean it's neat that Trump is a convicted felon. That makes him seem cool and dangerous," said Joe Schmorp, a generic, independent blue-collar voter from the Midwest. "But on the other hand, the fact that Joe Biden has managed to effectively conceal his felonies and escape conviction speaks to his legal prowess and competence."
"Such a tough decision."
Political experts confirm that while Trump's conviction for business records falsification may have helped him with some voters, Joe Biden's brilliant escape from charges for classified document mishandling, corruption, foreign bribery schemes, rape, and child molestation deserves some recognition as well. "Don't write off the unconvicted felon this November," said pollster Nate Silver.
Other Americans simply expressed gratitude for having such incredible choices on the presidential ticket. "You really can't go wrong with either of them," said another generic independent voter, also from the Midwest.
At publishing time, RFK tried to enter the conversation by reminding everyone about all the felonies his family members had never been convicted of.
https://babylonbee.com/news/american-voters-looking-forward-to-choosing-between-convicted-felon-and-unconvicted-felon
10 Most Terrifying Examples Of LGBTQ People Being Oppressed In America Today
As we weather yet another Pride month, it can be helpful to remember what Pride means and the hardships experienced by members of the LGBTQ community in this country — even now.
The Babylon Bee has put together the following list of sobering examples of how LGBTQ people are oppressed in the United States to this very day:
There are only 37 parades in their honor per day: Any number of daily parades less than 40 is equal to a slap in the face.
They are only represented by 7 characters in every TV show: There will be no equality as long as movies and television shows only depict 10 times the representation of reality.
They are still required to be fully clothed when teaching their elementary school classes: Such bigotry.
The Capitol hearing room is now off-limits for making sex tapes: Way to ruin it for everyone, creepy congressional staffer guy.
They can only get married in Methodist, Lutheran, Episcopal, Presbyterian, Anglican, Unitarian, Baptist, and Quaker churches: Horrible.
They live in daily fear of fake hate crimes: Fake assaults happen on every street corner of every city.
They have only managed to get 75% of Christians fired for their beliefs: As long as any Christians remain employed and unostracized from society, there will be no justice.
That one specific baker in Colorado won't bake a wedding cake for them: It doesn't matter that there are hundreds of bakers who will. This guy won't.
When they twerk naked in front of children, people say horrible things like "Hey, what do you think you're doing?" and "Woah, knock it off!": The blind hatred of these comments is horrifying.
No gay person has been elected president since Barack Obama: Make the White House gay again!
Yes, LGBTQ people clearly still have an incredibly tough time here in America, as opposed to much more open-minded and accepting parts of the world, like brave Palestine.
https://babylonbee.com/news/10-most-terrifying-examples-of-lgbtq-people-being-oppressed-in-america-today
Joe and Hunter Biden used Sandy Hook memorial service visit to forge secret $10 million-a-year deal with China
STATION GOSSIP 11:38 News
A fresh tranche of documents released by Congress shows that Joe and Hunter Biden used a memorial service for Sandy Hook victims to arra...
A fresh tranche of documents released by Congress shows that Joe and Hunter Biden used a memorial service for Sandy Hook victims to arrange a secret meeting with China over a $10 million-a-year deal for the Biden Crime Family.
Congress gave the documents to the IRS which investigated the First Son. They show that Hunter communicated with Liu Yadong, a top executive at Chinese oil giant CEFC, via the Chinese messaging app WeChat on Dec. 12, 2017, to set up a meeting for his father.
"Can you meet this early evening?" Hunter asked Liu. "My father will be in New York also and he wants me to attend the Sandyhook [sic] memorial service with him and I would like him to meet you along with my uncle [Jim Biden] and then you can I can talk let me know if that works."
"No problem," Liu responded. "Pls let me know where and when to meet."
Bidens: you've got a lot of 'splaining to do!
The scheme involved an extensively negotiated deal in which CEFC, which is directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), agreed to pay the Biden Crime Family $10 million per year. When this did not happen as planned, things got ugly.
In July 2017, Hunter reportedly sent "threatening" texts to CEFC official Runlong Zhao demanding that he follow through on the deal, using his dad's political tenure as a weapon.
"I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled," Hunter wrote in one of the threatening texts.
A few weeks later on Aug. 3, 2017, Hunter texted CEFC associate Gongwen "Kevin" Dong to say that he wanted a "$]10 M per annum budget," adding that "the Bidens are the best I know at doing exactly what the [CEFC] Chairman wants from this partnership."
In 2017, mind you, Joe held no political office. He had just been kicked out of the White House following the end of Barack Obama's second term, and he would not become "president" until several years later in early 2021.
In November 2017, Hunter set up a group text conversation on an encrypted WhatsApp channel with his father and uncle, the latter of whom was also a partner in the multi-million-dollar deal with CEFC.
One of the contacts in the group chat was named "Jim Biden" by Hunter, with the other being named "Dad."
The House Ways and Means Committee published a photo of Yadong's business card showing him as CEO of CEFC Global Strategic Holdings, along with an address at the United Nations Plaza in New York City.
CEFC created a sham charity that Yadong helped to run as well, this fake charity being one of the tools through which chief Patrick Ho funneled bribe money to foreign officials. Patrick was convicted for these crimes in 2018.
These latest revelations are on top of what was uncovered from Hunter's abandoned laptop. They prove that Hunter lied back in February in his congressional testimony.
"Hunter Biden lied about the recipient of a WhatsApp message sent with the apparent intention to threaten a business associate and demand payment," said committee chairman Jason Smith about the matter.
"In the message, Hunter Biden twice mentioned he was with his father. In the deposition, Hunter Biden sought to dismiss the message, claiming that he was either 'high or drunk' when he sent it, and in that state, had sent it to the wrong Zhao, and not actually the one affiliated with the Chinese energy company, CEFC."
https://www.stationgossip.com/2024/06/joe-and-hunter-biden-used-sandy-hook.html
Hey Gmenfan-
That has always been an interesting statistic. One that the fake news has avoided time and again.
..................al
Supreme Court Will Consider Doctrine Case That Could Defang the Deep State
Nick R. HamiltonJune 4, 2024 - 10:14 am
The Supreme Court has taken on a potential landmark case regarding the Chevron deference doctrine.
The case could change the way unelected bureaucrats in federal agencies are allowed to decide how to interpret laws when they are unclear.
The doctrine has become a sticking point for conservatives.
Many see the doctrine as giving the deep state too much power to control the federal government.
In effect, agency bureaucrats use the doctrine to get the power to change laws by reinterpreting them.
However, most of those longtime bureaucrats are liberal Democrats, according to Republicans.
David Doniger, a lawyer who helped create the doctrine in 1984, said:
“Initially this doctrine was embraced by judges and scholars of all stripes as a neutral principle for how you sort things out when Congress leaves some of the questions unanswered.”
But as time went on, the doctrine served to essentially give lawmaking power to unelected bureaucrats, and most of the time it went in a decidedly liberal direction.
Case Western Reserve University law professor Jonathan Adler wrote about the doctrine for the Cato Institute, a conservative think tank.
“It has made it too easy for agencies to revise regulatory requirements and too difficult for courts to police the boundaries of agency authority,” Adler wrote.
Conservatives on the court have commented on the doctrine before, most recently in 2022.
At the time, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito that “the whole project deserves a tombstone no one can miss.”
Slay the latest News for free!
The current case was brought by herring fishermen in Maine.
The fishermen balked at being told by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that they would have to pay for government observers to make sure they weren’t overfishing the area.
The Chevron doctrine gives the EPA the right to decide how the observers should be paid.
Those bureaucrats then decided the fishermen should pay.
Prominent conservatives, including billionaire Charles Koch, are paying for the case.
The express purpose of the case is to bring a challenge to the doctrine before the nation’s high court.
If the doctrine is struck down, it could have almost a Roe V. Wade kind of impact on the federal government.
There could be some confusion and chaos as courts try to figure out how to decide who should interpret laws when they are ambiguous.
If the case goes against the doctrine, it will take the teeth out of America’s unelected bureaucracy.
As such, it could save President Donald Trump from having to follow through on his promise to gut the deep state.
https://slaynews.com/news/supreme-court-consider-doctrine-case-defang-deep-state/
Hated California DA refused to charge accused attempted murderer; Sheriff turned to Feds for justice
Golden Gate Media
3 days ago
The Alameda County Sheriff's Office (ACSO) revealed that a convicted felon on federal probation, faced federal charges for a January 2024 stabbing after local progressive district attorney Pamela Price's office declined prosecution for a violent stabbing that nearly killed a man.
This decision comes amidst mounting criticism against Liberal progressive District Attorney Pamela Price, who faces a recall vote in November.
On January 30, 2024, deputies responded to Meek Estate Park in Hayward following a stabbing incident.
The victim, a 52-year-old male, sustained severe injuries to his abdomen, necessitating emergency surgery, the sheriff's office said.
He recounted to deputies that Barroca, 59, had confronted him with a flashlight before stabbing him as he attempted to leave, according to the sheriff's office.
During the investigation, it emerged that Barroca, known for prior incidents at the park, was spotted by a Hayward Area Recreation and Park District ranger supervisor wearing attire matching the victim's description, deputies said.
The victim positively identified Barroca, leading to an arrest warrant issued by an Alameda County judge for the assault with a deadly weapon, deputies added.
Despite the compelling evidence, the Alameda County District Attorney's Office, under the leadership of Price, who has been criticized for being soft-on-crime and insensitive to crime victims, declined to pursue charges against Barroca, the sheriff's office said.
However, his extensive criminal history, including attempted murder, weapon violations, and drug offenses, prompted federal authorities to act. Barroca's federal probation officer secured a warrant for his arrest on a federal probation violation, citing ongoing community threat.
On May 30, 2024, the U.S. Marshals located and apprehended Barroca, subsequently discovering further violations at his residence, the sheriff's office stated.
ACSO expressed gratitude to partners at HARD, the U.S. Probation Office, and the U.S. Marshals Service for their collaborative efforts in removing Barroca from Alameda County's streets.
https://original.newsbreak.com/[@ userid=1351221]/3475576009062-hated-california-da-refused-to-charge-accused-attempted-murderer-sheriff-turned-to-feds-for-justice?s=a7&pd=0FZoqtzk&hl=en_US&send_time=1717519778&actBtn=feedbackShareButton&_f=app_share&trans_data=%7B%22platform%22%3A1%2C%22cv%22%3A%2224.22.1%22%2C%22languages%22%3A%22en%22%7D
Hey bbotcs-
I believe the Marxists will use anything they can to gain power, dem, repub, independent, or libertarian. The slimy bastards are everywhere.
..............al
A sham wrapped in banana
By Silvio Canto, Jr.
It's hard to think about the Trump verdict without thinking of bananas, republics that is. Who knew that we would ever see such a travesty in the U.S.? I didn't but then again I have never suffered from a derangement syndrome.
I agree with Matt Taibbi:
Maureen Dowd in the New York Times in this morning’s op-ed about Donald Trump’s trial:
Even though the case was a stretch and not the strongest one against Trump, there was something refreshing about the jury doing what no one else around Trump has been able to do -- not the inexplicably sycophantish Republican lawmakers, not the corrupt Supreme Court, not the slowpoke Merrick Garland.
Whoa. Trump has so altered American consciousness that detractors feel comfortable publicly supporting the idea of slapping 34 felony convictions on the man as punishment for alleged earlier offenses. Dowd’s slip (if it was one) wasn’t rare. Editorial pages, broadcast panels, even political mailers in the past days implored readers to focus on Trump’s overall history, not this particular case.
Yes, we are irrationally obsessed with Trump that we want him destroyed. I remember when we used to send people like that to a psychiatrist, or a witch doctor in previous generations or some cultures.
The good news is that Trump is right when he refers to them as sick and nasty people. They are making his case every time that they go so far just to get the Orange Man. We will survive and Trump will return to power. I just hope that he appoints an Attorney General who goes after lawfare for once and for all.
In the meantime, I hope that some red state district attorneys are exploring their options. I guess that statutes of limitation don't matter and local district attorneys are now free to go after presidents. Wonder what accounting procedure was used to record the Paula Jones payments? I'd like to know.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/a_sham_wrapped_in_banana.html
Two quick points about the ‘conviction’
By George Shuster
I wish to make two quick points about last week’s “conviction” of President Trump, because, though important, they have not yet been made with the clarity they deserve:
1. Immediately after the verdict was announced, District Attorney Alvin Bragg could not rush to the podium fast enough to lie to the American people. He said the jury unanimously convicted Trump of falsifying business records to influence the election. Here are his words:
The twelve everyday jurors vowed to make a decision based on the evidence and the law, and the evidence and the law alone. Their deliberations led them to a unanimous conclusion, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant, Donald J. Trump is guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, to conceal a scheme to corrupt the 2016 election.
He knows that is false, because corrupt Judge Merchan instructed that there were at least two other paths to a guilty verdict, having nothing whatsoever to do with the election; on this point it is entirely possible that far from being unanimous on guilt, the jury was unanimous in concluding that he was innocent. Put another way, Bragg knows full well that it is possible not a single juror found Trump was trying to influence the election.
This is one of the many issues ripe for appeal. In the meantime, anyone who hears one of the fascists of the left repeating Bragg’s lie should call out their lie, and point out that they are the ones trying to influence the election by dishonest means.
2. When the Supreme Court agreed to take up the issue of presidential immunity, the left predictably howled with feigned indignation. They said the Court was doing so only to assist Trump, because the issue was allegedly “simple” and that the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. had supposedly “masterfully” solved the issue by determining there could never be any immunity no matter what the circumstances. Yet the SCOTUS was required to take up the issue because a) it was a case of first impression, caused by the fact that no other regime in U.S. history has attempted this sort of broad-scale weaponization of the government against its political opponents, b) it has therefore now become an important issue not only with regard to Trump, but as to all presidents in the future, and c) it is indeed a very complex issue, going to the very constitutional structure of balance between the coordinate branches of government.
What the left seems to be oblivious about is the fact that they have provided a rich menu or template against which the issue of immunity must be assessed. In fact, the more intense and extensive their weaponization efforts, the more it is incumbent on the SCOTUS to analyze immunity from every angle. If, as can be predicted, the opinions they render are themselves very complex, the left owes that fact to their own complex network of lawfare.
The Court will undoubtedly identify certain proactive areas which need partial or complete immunity under our system. If the Court does its job fully, however, the left has demonstrated a need for a reactive carve-out as well. A president needs to be able to react to political partisan lawfare by demonstrating its character. The jurisprudence of selective prosecution would provide a good starting point for analysis along those lines. Unless a president can protect his decisions against nakedly partisan attacks abusing the legal system, America will kiss separation of powers goodbye, and a corrupt regime will be able to attack without restraint its political enemies, just as they do in totalitarian tyrannies throughout the world.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/two_quick_points_about_the_conviction.html
Lawfare: DNC flavor of the month
By Paul C. Binotto
The same people who claim Alito’s bias and demand his recusal now have and will defend the burning and desecration of the nation's flag in all manner of so-called “peaceful protest” during the Black Lives Matter riots and the pro-Hamas campus protests. They will also give apology for, and in other contexts, say they despise the American flag and the republic for which it stands.
Politico shills for Scott Wiener, an LGBTQ+ activist, in his fight for Pelosi’s seat
By Andrea Widburg
Politico, a Democrat media outlet, wrote a profile of California state senator Scott Wiener. It’s interesting because Wiener is running against Nancy Pelosi for her seat in the House of Representatives, and it’s clear that Politico thinks Pelosi’s time is over. However, to elevate Wiener, Politico had to gloss over Wiener’s more sexually offensive behaviors and policies.
The gist of the essay is simple: Wiener is the dynamic, pro-business (San Francisco-style, of course) future, while Pelosi is already in the past. But since Pelosi still has the women’s vote and a daughter who might want her mother’s seat eventually, Wiener is courting women. In other words, we’re seeing the old guard versus the new guard and the gays versus the women. It’s the typical modern Democrat party internecine battle.
But to make the article palatable, Politico had to ignore a few things about Scott Wiener. Here’s how Politico describes his sexuality:
Wiener is hardly a typical male politician — he’s a gay man who paints his nails (he was sporting a cherry-red polish during his interview) and shows up to kink festivals in San Francisco shirtless and in a leather harness.
That’s it, but there’s so much more. First, about those “kink festivals.” Last July, a shirtless Wiener posted a picture of himself attending the “Amazing Dore Alley street fair”:
That looks pretty par for the course for a modern leftist politician. Nothing too outré out that, right?
Well, yes, unless you know what the “Dore Alley” or, as it’s more commonly known, the “Up Your Alley” fair is about. In 2008 and 2015, published photo essays about the fair. Do not click on the links if there are children around or if you’re in a public place. Do not click on the links if you have a low-revulsion tolerance.
Most especially, do not click on the links if you do not like seeing the following activities on a city street: men wearing bondage gear and nothing else, outfitted as demons, masturbating in public (alone or in groups), being whipped, being sodomized with objects, engaging in oral sex, engaging in Sam Brinton-style pup play, doing awful things with urine, or displaying deeply blasphemous slogans.
The fact that a person in public life would not only attend the Dore Alley fair but would actually boast about it should horrify people. The public behavior is so debased and so perverted that those who enjoy those activities should hope that no one ever knows about them. But of course, that’s not Wiener’s style. He’s out and oh-so-proud.
Scrolling through Wiener’s Instagram feed, you realize that a large part of his life revolves around his sexuality. A quick visual survey says that approximately 30% of his posts are informed by his obsession with what he does with his genitals.
I don’t mean he’s posting pictures of himself having sex (thank God). It’s just that his “G” identity in the LGBTQ+ spectrum is non-stop. It’s “gay” this and “trans” that and “LGBTQ+” the other over and over. The remaining 70% is garden-variety modern leftism (abortion, unions, masks, lockdowns, racial obsession, gun grabs, vaccines, Big Government, climate change, etc.), making him indistinguishable from Pelosi herself.
However, it’s not just that Wiener’s sexual orientation obsesses him at a personal level. It also affects him at a political level. What Politico failed to report about Wiener is how he’s been very active in changing some important California policies.
Thanks to Wiener, if you knowingly infect someone with HIV in California—a fatal disease unless you live the rest of your life on drugs—it’s no longer a felony. Now, it’s a misdemeanor.
Thanks to Scott Wiener, California identification and other documents have become meaningless because they recognize a “gender” other than the only two human sexes.
Thanks to Scott Wiener, it’s no longer illegal for a 25-year-old to have sex with a 15-year-old. What’s really funny is that Wiener argued that laws forbidding ephebophilia (i.e., sexual attraction to adolescents) are specifically homophobic. Harvey Milk, an ephebophile who became a martyr when he was assassinated in 1978 (everyone ignores that Mayor Moscone, a straight man, was assassinated, too), would be proud. Parents who love their teenagers, though, should be very worried.
Lastly, on the sexual side, thanks to Scott Wiener, California is now a “trans refugee” state, protecting children seeking so-called “gender-affirming care” in California. It’s ostensibly intended to protect children and their families from “anti-trans” laws in other states such as Florida and South Carolina. However, you can readily see it being used to protect runaways from their parents or children stolen away by one parent in custody battles.
One more thing that bugs me: Wiener loves parading around his Jewishness as a leftist cudgel. However, the best that he could come up with regarding the Israel-Hamas war was a statement back in November when he called for the hostages to be returned (that was good) and then demanded a ceasefire, Netanyahu’s ouster, and a two-state solution, with Israel on the one side and an openly exterminationist enemy on the other. And how he wants that two-state solution...
Before today, it would be hard for me to imagine anyone worse for America than Nancy Pelosi. However, now we know: Wiener is it. You don’t want to put this man anywhere near the federal government, lest he do to America what he and his partners do to each other.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/politico_shills_for_scott_wiener_an_lgbtq_activist_in_his_fight_for_pelosi_s_seat.html
Biden's sneaky back-door amnesty for illegals
By Monica Showalter
That's who Biden is bringing in to our country in his pursuit of more Democrat votes. He's not even honest about it -- he's sneaking it through as these politicized judges dismiss these cases on the grounds that these characters are no threat to the public, except of course, some of them are.
Trump or Demented Dems: who is really going to prison?
By Noel S. Williams
Demented Dems are salivating at the perverted idea that Trump could go to prison.
They are demented because they are the ones who are mentally imprisoned.
It is perverted because they live in an alternate universe where not only the established tenets of human nature are skewed, but where the laws that make civil society compatible are ripped asunder. A place where Dems like Joe Biden and Hillary are above the law, but MAGA Republicans are beneath it.
No wonder Dems denounce western civilization -- they don’t adhere to its emphasis on reason and rationality. They don’t recognize the better angels of our nature. Rather than celebrate one of our foundational premises -- the (ongoing) pursuit of equal justice -- they seem determined to take us back to the dark ages, where might makes right.
I shudder to think of even the remote prospect of our (likely) future president being put in a Dem prison. Regardless, he will never be imprisoned. The MAGA-truth, accompanied by spiritual awakening, will set him free. The MAGA “deplorables” will set him free. The ultimate verdict, wrought by the elections, will set us free.
So who is really going to prison? The unrepentant, diehard Dems will remain forlorn. Without invasive intervention, they’ll remain trapped in stifling leftist orthodoxy. Their mental prison being contaminated by repetitive negative thoughts and dark Dem emotions. Confusion, depression and anxiety riddle their broken, Bidenesque brains.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy might help them breakout from their Dem delusions. Then again, such are the depths of their Trump Derangement Syndrome, that a session of electrical brain tapping, a form of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, may finally help them escape their mental imprisonment.
Meanwhile, no matter his temporal conditions, Trump will enthusiastically lead us to broad, sunlit uplands, free of illegal aliens. A place where the better MAGA-angels of our nature frolic. A place where truth shall make one free.
But don’t worry you anti-American and anti-Western Dems -- he won’t go medieval on you. Success will be his revenge as you rot in your mental prison. As FDR mused, “[m]en are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/trump_or_demented_dems_who_is_really_going_to_prison.html
Holding Anthony Fauci accountable?
By Paul S. Gardiner
Another criminal referral to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) soon may be made by members of the U.S. Congress to investigate Dr. Anthony Fauci for lying under oath to Congress, which is a felony crime. Representative Jim Comer, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, soon may follow Senator Rand Paul in requesting that the DOJ to criminally investigate Fauci for lying under oath to Congress.
But lying to Congress does not even begin to compare with or address the horrendous amount of suffering and death caused by the toxic health care policies and hospital protocols developed and promulgated by Anthony Fauci and many of the officials listed herein. In this regard, these officials bear “superior responsibility” for the health care policies and toxic protocols that killed tens (hundreds?) of thousands of Americans during the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Rather than hope for a bona fide DOJ investigation of Anthony Fauci and other high-ranking officials for alleged federal crimes, efforts are underway at the state level in Florida, Texas, and Louisiana to have criminal investigations conducted based on violations of state criminal codes. If the investigations establish sufficient probable cause of crimes being committed, then the accused individuals can and should be indicted and prosecuted to the full extent of state law.
Each of the legal briefs described herein contains extensive evidence of state crimes committed. The briefs include numerous handwritten letters submitted by aggrieved next-of-kin family members requesting the criminal investigations. Contact information for details about COVID-19 victims in each of the three states is also provided.
The Florida, Texas, and Louisiana attorneys general and district attorneys need to honor their citizens’ requests for justice and accountability for the deaths of their loved ones. Further, these public officials swore an oath to stand for justice and protect the rights and lives of their respective citizenry. Now is the time for these public servants to courageously and rightly pursue truth and justice on behalf of their aggrieved citizens and their lost loved ones.
Below is a brief summary of the Florida, Texas, and Louisiana legal briefs.
FLORIDA: In October 2023, a 20-page legal brief with exhibits was submitted by attorneys, including an ex-prosecutor, to the Florida attorney general and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. The extensive legal brief requests investigation and subsequent indictment and prosecution of the below named individuals for alleged statewide COVID-related criminal offenses committed against tens of thousands of Floridians. To date, little if any action has been taken on this request.
The request was made on behalf of the next-of-kin relatives of 32 victims in Florida, who request investigation into the deaths of their loved ones under toxic COVID-19 hospital protocols; intentional COVID-19 infection mismanagement; and suppression and denial of life-saving treatments in Florida hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities.
The accused include:
- Anthony Fauci, ex-director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Cliff Lane, deputy director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Francis Collins, ex-director, National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Deborah Birx, ex–White House COVID response coordinator & former director of DOD HIV Research at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
- Rochelle Walensky, ex-director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Stephen Hahn, ex-commissioner, Federal Drug Administration (FDA)
- The administrators of hospital systems providing care to patients in Florida, including but not limited to AdventHealth Hospital Organization
Alleged violations of Florida criminal code include:
- Murder while Committing Acts of Terrorism, Fl. Stat. §782.04
- Murder while Committing Aggravated Abuse of the Elderly and Disabled Adults, Fl. Stat. §782.04
- Aggravated Manslaughter of the Elderly, Disabled Adults, and Children, Fl. Stat. §782.07
- Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO), Fl. Stat. §895.03
TEXAS: In March 2024, a 26-page legal brief with exhibits was submitted by attorneys to the district attorneys of 22 Texas counties to initiate criminal investigations of Anthony Fauci and other officials for alleged COVID-related crimes committed against citizens of Texas. The criminal referral requests (to be sent to Texas attorney general Ken Paxton) were submitted to the district attorneys for Angelina, Bexar, Brazos, Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Fort Bend, Galveston, Guadalupe, Grayson, Gregg, Harris, Hays, Johnson, Lubbock, Montgomery, Smith, Tarrant, Tom Green, Travis, and Wise Counties. Current status of the referral requests is unknown at present.
The requests were made on behalf of the next-of-kin relatives of 46 victims in Texas, who request investigation into the deaths of their loved ones under toxic COVID-19 hospital protocols, intentional COVID-19 infection mismanagement, and suppression and denial of life-saving treatments in Texas hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities.
The accused include the same individuals in the above Florida filing with the addition of the following officials:
- Robert Redfield, ex-director, CDC
- Peter Daszak, president, Eco-Health Alliance
- Rick Bright, director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
- The administrators and health care providers of hospital systems and facilities providing care to patients in Texas, including but not limited to Baylor, Scott, and White Hospital Systems.
Alleged violations of Texas criminal code include:
- Capital Murder – Tex. Penal Code §19.03(a)(7);
- Manslaughter – Tex. Penal Code §19.04;
- Trafficking of Persons – Tex. Penal Code §20A.02;
- Participation in enterprise through racketeering or unlawful debt collection – Tex. Penal Code §72.04 by Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity – Tex. Penal Code §71.02;
- Injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual – Tex. Penal Code §22.04
LOUISIANA: Next-of-kin relatives of nine Louisianians (victims) request investigation into the deaths of their lost loved ones under toxic COVID-19 hospital protocols; intentional COVID-19 infection mismanagement; and suppression and denial of life-saving treatments in Louisiana hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities. In response to their requests, attorneys have prepared an extensive 30-page legal brief with exhibits that soon will be submitted to the Louisianna attorney general and applicable district attorneys.
The accused include the same individuals listed in the Florida and Texas legal briefs.
Alleged violations of Louisiana criminal code include:
- Terrorism – by Causing Intentional Killing or Infliction of Serious Bodily Injury, La. R.S. 14:128.1(A);
- First Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30 and Second Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30.1;
- Manslaughter, La. R.S. 14:31(A)(3);
- Prohibited Racketeering Acts, La. R.S. 15:1353;
- Cruelty to Persons with Infirmities, La. R.S. 14:93.3;
- False Imprisonment, La. R.S. 14:46 and Second Degree Kidnapping, La. R.S. 14:44.1
A FINAL THOUGHT: The late evangelist Billy Graham once said: “Courage is contagious — when a brave man takes a stand, the spines of others are often stiffened.” America desperately needs at least one brave prosecutor to lead in courageously pursuing truth and justice on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of aggrieved next-of-kin families who wrongfully lost loved ones during the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/06/holding_anthony_fauci_accountable.html
Libertarians: Vote for Trump with your eyes open
By Jay Davidson
Trump is one of only two choices we have. The fact that the ever-bigger-government left hates him so much strongly suggests that leftists fear Trump. Therefore, he is on the right track. The fact that a leftist population and N.Y. justice system would warp the concept of law to such an extreme tells me that they are the real danger to freedom. The left is making the decision for us. We cannot allow this tyranny to exist in America.
‘Getting Trrump’ Doesn’t Solve Anything
By Christopher Chantrill
Do you not understand, dear liberal friends, that your problem is not Trump, or bitter clingers, or deplorables, or clowns. Ordinary middle-class people are voting for populist nationalist parties and politicians all over the western world not because of racism or hate or white privilege, but because your ideas, your politics, your rule Makes Things Worse.
The Trump Conviction and the New Democrat Playbook
By P.F. Kelly, Jr.
The new breed of radical Democrats can’t talk about their real priorities, which plainly is to transform American society and traditions, and they can’t lie about it forever, so they have only one option: shut down the opposition. Shut down their most formidable opponents.
The State of the Coup
By Jim Darlington
They promoted the BLM/Antifa riots, in the middle of a national quarantine and lockdown. They mandated vaccines for all, that are somewhere between worthless and murderous. They’ve broken the border and broken the people’s bank accounts. They’ve managed to make the weapons dealers richer while making our military a joke. They’ve made our cities filthy and dangerous. They are turning our little boys into little girls, unable to properly read or write or do ‘rithmatic.