Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Correct, and you are only thinking of the delay in a needed procedure. There is also the risk of stroke or heart attack during those 5 days as the blood thinner levels lessen. I take eliquis and go through this. Had a minor stroke at age 26. George Carlin " A minor heart attack is one somebody else is having"
Earnings cc on November 4. Good timing as there shouldn't be anything else big in the news that day.
Does anyone have info on a post on yahoo regarding the complete redaction of REFRESH2 and TISORB from the clinical trial site? "CG" is the poster on yahoo.
His bio says he's 79 and a neurological surgeon for 53 years.
My post was about a NJ neurosurgeon who is very high on the filter's use for emergency surgeries(?)
This is enormous. They should interview him and PR it
This board's been pretty quiet. Check out the post by "ANTHONY" on the yahoo board. He identifies himself as neurosurgeon Dr. Anthony A. Chiurco from NJ. If his post doesn't get your heart pumpin' and blood flowin' then you are hopeless. Wow wow wow what a post by an accomplished surgeon.
Canes, I enjoy your posts and respect you. I have been involved in a couple of stocks where we got our clocks cleaned. There were folks on the message boards who were attacked for not being positive enough for some other folks, who were cheerleaders, but turned out to be very very wrong in the end. I have always read every single post available on the message boards of my stocks because I never want to miss something valuable that could be posted by someone viewed as "the enemy". Please everyone, do not view this as an endorsement of Mike or anybody else. Mike's post annoy me at times. All I'm saying Canes is to be careful who you censor out. As painful as some posts can be, that same poster may come up with something obscure from the web that nobody else has. Trust me on this and look up the stories of Implant Sciences IMSC and Crystallex International KRY. Both had posters who would viciously attack the integrity of people who dared to ask questions, questions that so very obviously needed answering. Thanks for your time everyone. GO CTSO!
AH back to 9.30. I'll take it.
Canes post removed(?) What is going on here lately?
Good news. Opinions on if this is what has driven the recent sp rise or should this propel us even higher? Thx in advance
Canes, I hear ya. What's very strange is that post was originally attributed to Techxen(?) and then it changed. Bizarre
Interesting post on stocktwits referencing a post on reddit
Dept of Defense giving us another $1.1 million for Hemodefend
Thanks Orange. I looked them up and their stock has actually been down so I don't know if there are issues with their drug going into phase 3(?) My concern is that the government almost always prefers drugs. Some news here would certainly clear things up but I certainly understand the company can't PR what they don't know.
There's been no comment about needing an FDA trial yet, although folks here think it will be needed. I'm fine with it but let's get on with it.
I was of the impression we were THE option to remove Brilinta but they are already to phase 3?
I just saw a clip of the Regeneron CEO talking to Dr. Oz. He spoke with great enthusiasm about the company and what they do.
If they need a trial, tell us and let's get on with it. I don't want to find that out months from now, putting us at square one at that time. Time does matter to some of us. I wouldn't mind if I was 30...but I'm not
It would be nice to know what is going on with FDA
It was only $10 per share up to a couple of years back
They estimate MyoKardia (sorry about the prior spelling) revenues to be $1.5 billion by 2025. Buyout is $225 a share
Interesting deal between Bristol Myers Squibb and Myocardia for $13.1 billion as Myocardia apparently developed a revolutionary drug but it is not yet approved.
A post of mine was removed where I wrote that I had written the company(?) Did I write something else that broke a rule? Thanks and I'll apologize now if I did
Thank you. I didn't see that one
Um....not sure why we are arguing while on the same team/page. I'm in agreement. I like the President (Please everybody just avoid politics now). I have written in the past 24 hours to every big name conservative he speaks with telling them of the filter in case, in the off chance, that this info is still not known. I'm glad you have confidence that they do. It buoys me. Are these the actions of a basher like I'm accused of by this other guy? It's ridiculous. Take T out of the equation. Could you imagine if we saved a senator? This is very frustrating. Regarding life and death, I'm fully aware this disease can change quick. I don't minimize it for one second.
Don't play games. If we are "the filter", the best in the world, to alleviate cytokine storm, we should be known. If we aren't, and apparently you don't know just like me, then who is responsible for this? Which president? One or two? 7 months of virus and it's possible we have not been heard of by the highest level doctors handling the biggest patient in the world(?) I'm asking seriously. Some priest in east jabib got the filter. I was hoping Chan would answer. I don't think responding "We've gotten Army grants, Walter Reed is a military hospital, and they do stock our filters. I can't comment further". Anything wrong with this (I'm asking the other reasonable people on here, not the excuse maker who continues to personally attack my motives)?
The President being given drugs in an effort to prevent the cytokine storm from occurring. Marc Siegel of Fox saying that's the potential risk. Do any of these doctors know we exist?
It's Saturday night, the news is discussing the possibility of cytokine storm and the accompanying inflammation for the President, and I cannot honestly answer that the docs involved have the slightest idea we exist. That's ridiculous. Not one mention anywhere about what would be done if he develops this. How is this possible? Please spare me the basher bullshit. This is a serious question from a long time investor and concerned American.
Vogel(?)
I got a number of friends into this stock, one with a ton more shares than me. He texted me that the company doesn't answer him when he e-mails. Very nice.
Put your helmet on.
What the hell is the status of the FDA approval? Do we need a trial, as most think, or don't we? The answer to this question is material news. The fact that we don't know leads me to believe that they don't know. 6 months! Pick up the phone.
She died after they took the baby by C Section. Horrible. RIP.
PR released on Brazil. Premarket is $9.07 albeit on light volume
C'mon baby! Let's will this thing to one more green day this week. Cap this week off big! Come to Papa.
The short video posted on facebook and twitter by the company is pretty good. About 4 minutes long, "Peter" narrates how he got scratched in his garden and it all went downhill quickly developing into sepsis. Treated in ICU multiple times with Cytosorb which he credits with saving his life. Worth a look.
REMOVE comments, stay with me. I've posted before that I am a survivor of an 11 hour heart surgery that saved my life in 1993. I had endocarditis from staph, a very bad prognosis. I received someone else's aorta and aortic valve, a human graft (thank you to that donor and donor family for saving me) but I suffered tremendous damage to my one ventricle due to the "cleansing" they had to do to get the infection/abscess out. I was a mess pre op and really prepared to die. So I don't need to explain why REMOVE results are of high interest to me. While we wait, I went back to the March 2, 2020 PR detailing the smaller 58 person study. It makes me a bit more optimistic regarding what the full 250 person study may reveal (I admit I could be completely wrong). Why? Try to follow this ex banker's medical logic. Of the 58 patients, 30 got Cytosorb usage during surgery while the control 28 did not. Although 5 of the 30 Cytosorbers got sepsis post op, none died from it. 3 did die, but I am uncertain if any of those 3 were from the 5 sepsis patients who had recovered from the sepsis but died from heart complications. Anyway, 3 people died but it was not from sepsis. Recall what I described in my own personal surgery where I survived the infection but the radical surgery and collateral heart damage nearly killed me. Shift to the control group. 11 of the 28 came down with sepsis post op and 5 die from it. Ironically sepsis kills all 5 from the control group that die, unlike the 3 who had Cytosorb but died from "something else". Am I foolishly optimistic? Maybe. But it seems like a bit of bad luck that 3 (10%) died from "something else" in the Cytosorb group while none in the control group did. It skews the mortality %. Should even out in a bigger study, no? Anyway, I felt I should go back and look at the March 2 stuff to understand better. Again, I am a retired banker and there are probably medical people here that can/will poke (blast?) holes in what I've written. I welcome other opinions and admit I am just theorizing and have no idea what the hell I'm talking about LOL.
Time matters for retired people who are younger and retired people on here who are older. We are waiting for 2 things. I said that the combination of less than stellar REMOVE results AND FDA saying we need a trial after waiting already for 6 months for this guidance, the combination, will not be good for the share price (hence "We're screwed"). Individually, REMOVE without improving mortality is not good is it? We're a life saving company right? Doctors will need to be convinced to use the device. The FDA needing a trial, whether we should have known this was probable or not, is perhaps a necessary delay plain and simple. I'd call that neutral at best. So you have a negative REMOVE regarding mortality and an FDA delay of some period, neutral. So instead of "We're screwed" would it be better or make any difference to say "Those combined are going to be bad short term for the share price"? I posted 3 scenarios, with only one having both things not go our way. You argue "Everyone knew the trial was probable" so I'll ask...what are they waiting for (the FDA)? Will these two events, should they happen, raise the share price? Of course not. Not unless the FDA trial announcement comes with "We are accepting other data already obtained and shortening the trial" (pardon my non medical language). Now if somebody wants to tell us why or how those 2 in combination would be "Good" please have at it. Sheesh.