Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A lot of people here are talking like they are owning penny stocks for the first time - lol.
Agreed, this year I wouldn't expect much more than 0.1. Eventually this will likely rise *significantly* above even that.
You can't. On literally every board on ihub, when the PPS isn't doing much some clown will say 'Wow! Look at that accumulation! This thing is coiled!'
Just ignore people who say stuff like that.
Agreed, it will go through 0.0005 as it passes to 0.0002 or so.
It will get there, or very close. Those of us who loaded up at slightly lower levels will be very pleased.
> Xall is nothing but ‘fluff’
We were talking about the PR, and that was certainly complete fluff.
That's right, it will be cut in half pretty soon.
I would not recommend applying the principle 'where theirs (sic) smoke there's fire' to fluff PRs for pennystocks.
Exactly - garbage tweets like that can often do more harm than good, as they send a message that there is nothing substantively good to report.
I think it is more likely to be box-style loading coupled with some 3-tier purchases. If that is right, things look *very* good indeed.
Sorry that the facts seem to have triggered you here. Some things only take very basic business knowledge to understand. If you want to remain mystified as to why this company is trading at the price it is, you are welcome to do so and you will have much company around here. I'd rather just make money though, so I won't be playing that game.
> The Company plans to file patent applications to protect its novel use of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) to reduce the cost of advertising as it continues to transform into a tech company
Wait .... this company has been operating without patent protection so far? That's the first thing *any* company gets.
Let's not pretend this is a serious company. Good for a flip (and I still think a double is very possible here), but it will *never* obtain the highs it did during the pump and dump a few months ago.
> we still have an investor who believes this will be at.01 sooner or later, since they are professionals with more knowledge than i have, my money is on them.
That is 1/2 the current PPS. I have no idea which investor you are referring to.
Let's not get carried away. That happened *once*. Then the ticker lost 90% of its value.
Agreed, it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
I can't imagine knowing so little about pennystocks as to think that will have any effect at all.
Looks like a revenueless garbage company. Already cratering today.
Once this hits $1, $5 will be a complete triviality.
No-one can tell you that 'dilution looks done'. It can start again at any time. It's always a gamble with these low market cap companies that they may need (or just want) to dilute the *f* out of their stock for the $$$. In the case of this company the balance sheet is solid so I'm not super worried ... but it's simply a fact that you never know.
.03 would be a triple from here. I will be very wealthy if that happens!
Pure fluff. It is irrelevant how big the potential market is. Such figures are almost always exaggerated. But more importantly, you need to give substantive reason to think that the company in question is poised to gain even 1% of that market share. That's not automatic.
Zero revenue, non-reporting, and tons of dilution.
It's not cheap.
OK, well I'm glad you agree that a comment like 'Technological breakthroughs bring sales. SWARM.' is pretty funny. We certainly share that reaction.
Asking someone for their reasons for making a claim isn't bashing them. People don't get to just make nonsense up and then act triggered when others ask for reasons - this isn't Trump-land.
As for why you should believe me, the only claim I made was about the declining revenues over the last year, which is publicly available information.
> Plenty of PRs about it.
Not really, no. At least, not if you want actual content.
There's no evidence to suggest any of that is true. Pure wishful thinking. Their revenue has been declining quarter over quarter for a year and is now half what it was a year ago; that is the only thing that is 'rapid'.
If you want to disagree, post evidence. (Of course, you can't so you won't.)
There has been no recent announcement of any sort of technological breakthrough, so I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are there really people who didn't sell at 0.001? WTF were they thinking?
Why on earth did you buy at that price? Did you not do *any* dd?
So you are up. Where are you getting 83% from?
it's definitely not down 83% today.
you're definitely posting to the wrong message board.
What article are you talking about? Are you being sarcastic?
If so, I hope some of them contain some actual substance. That one certainly didn't.
I can't believe those longs who were dumb enough to be buying on Friday (intraday flippers excluded.)
Stage 1: thanks for the cheapies!
Stage 2: wow, look at all that accumulation!
Stage 3: those darn MMs / SEC keeping us down
Stage 4: it's not a loss until you sell!
Stage 5: consider it tuition money in the markets
Stage 6: well, at least we have our health.
Watch these stages unfold among the amateurs over the next few weeks.
Once $1 is established, $5 won't really be that hard, and will be pretty easily justified on the fundamentals.
What happens on this board couldn't be less relevant.
If revenues keep increasing at a reasonable pace, a reasonable valuation will easily give $5.
$5 not too long after that.