I need Graeme McDowell to catch fire tomorrow. Btw, what's happening with Steven Bowditch?... if you take away all his blow-ups(everything above double bogey), he'd only be +6... this is a guy who won the Byron Nelson last year.

I know how you feel... I've been saving Adam Scott

LOL... well obviously you've proved there is no use quibbling with a trolling blowhard with nothing better to do but endlessly and lamely defend something like HRC's unmistakable flip-flop on TPP. Anyone reading this particular thread will not be bowled-over with your flimsy line of reasoning or taken by your childlike personal attack.

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity. ~ Yeats

Thank God for the primaries!

Bernie has a message for you...

F6 -- That comment is no more ridiculous than "if he [Bernie Sanders] had a shred of integrity in actually caring about the things he claims to care about, he'd drop out right now and enthusiastically throw his support behind Hillary and work tirelessly through the general to get her elected."

Aww, poor Hillary... Bad Bernie... Bad-Bad Bernie!

She was very committed to the TPP during that time. She was on record 45 times supporting it as SoS. So let's say that she was supporting TPP on behalf of the Obama administration because that was her job. But if she didn't know what was in it at the time, that's on par with not knowing what she was talking about... THAT'S the dog that won't hunt, in my opinion.

The larger point here is the sense that she will move to the left on this issue during the primaries and then more than likely once she becomes the nominee will move back to the middle and say, "Hey we've got to be careful around these agreements, but here's a long list of benefits..."

We never were talking about her "comments" inasmuch as the promotion of TPP while she was Secretary of State.

Without Bernie Sanders we would have one corporate-friendly candidate promoting "the third way" of cooperation with the financial sector. And DWS would be on her short-list for VP.

Chris Christie is up to bat, now that Sister Sarah has struck out.

He sure gets around...

someone suggested that if you muted this speech, it looks like they're holding a bachelor auction but no one's biding on Chris.

McDowell, please

TPP Info: Consider the Source

A recent article about Barack Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership opened with this sunny headline: "Trade Pact Would Lift US Incomes, Study Says."

But wait, a study by whom? It comes from the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. What's that? We're not told, even though that information is key to understanding PIIE's upbeat take on the TPP trade scheme. Indeed, the Institute is largely funded by major global corporations that would gain enormous new power over consumers, workers, and the very sovereignty of America if Congress rubber stamps this raw deal. In fact, many of the multinational giants financing the Institute were among the 500 corporate powers that were literally allowed to help write the 2,000-page agreement – including Caterpillar, Chevron, IBM, GE, and General Motors. And get this: The Peterson Institute itself helped write this scam it's now hyping.

Is this Peterson guy some sort of unbiased scholar? Hardly. Pete Peterson, a Wall Street billionaire, is one of the 400 richest people in the US, and the founding chairman of his eponymous Institute. He's also a reactionary, anti-public-spending ideologue who was Nixon's commerce secretary. Hailed by the establishment as one of "the most influential billionaires in US politics," he uses that influence (and his fortune) to demonize such people's programs as Social Security and to push policies to enthrone the billionaire class over the rest of us. TPP would be his ultimate political coup against us commoners.

We don't need an academicky institute to tell us who would benefit from TPP. All we need to know is that it was negotiated in strict secrecy with global corporate elites, while we consumers, workers, and all others were locked out. Remember, if you're not at the table, you're on the menu.
http://www.jimhightower.com/send/send/8845

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/

I think Chris Hayes has it right when he tweeted:

@chrislhayes a word that people should probably familiarize themselves with:

kakistocracy


1. government by the worst persons; a form of government in which the worst persons are in power.

She knew enough to travel the planet to promote it! Do some research before asking dipshit questions.

Speaking of lobbyists....
just 2 weeks after the DNC ended Obama's lobbyist fundraising ban, Clinton announced a fundraiser with Wall Street and Pharma lobbyists:


Headline Feb. 13th: Bernie Sanders Presses Hillary Clinton To Demand DNC Keep Ban On Lobbyist Cash


Hours after last week’s Democratic presidential debate, where candidates criticized money’s influence over politics, word leaked that the Democratic National Committee was overturning President Barack Obama’s ban on accepting campaign cash from lobbyists and political action committees. Now, Sen. Bernie Sanders is calling for the DNC to honor Obama’s policy and reverse its decision — and is demanding Hillary Clinton join him in that stance.
http://www.ibtimes.com/bernie-sanders-presses-hillary-clinton-demand-dnc-keep-ban-lobbyist-cash-2306510





Headline Feb. 29th: Hillary Clinton 2016: DC Lobbyists Set To Raise Cash For Hillary Victory Fund


The Democratic National Committee’s recent move to end its ban on contributions from federal lobbyists was widely seen as a boost to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, which has ties to the Washington lobbying community. Clinton already appears to be taking advantage of the shift.

On Mar. 21, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and a handful of lobbying titans are scheduled to host a fundraiser for the Hillary Victory Fund, a joint fundraising account for the Clinton campaign, the DNC and 32 state parties. According to an invitation obtained by the Sunlight Foundation, Podesta’s co-hosts include Steve Elmendorf, Jeff Forbes and Susan Brophy — all of whom were government officials before becoming lobbyists at top D.C. firms. The event with Podesta — whose brother is a corporate lobbyist and fundraising bundler for Clinton — follows a recent fundraising blitz by Clinton in which her campaign raised money from financial, energy and other industries that expect to have business before the next president.

The DNC’s prohibition on lobbyist donations was instituted in 2008 at the behest of then-presidential candidate Barack Obama, who told voters: “They will not fund my party.” Clinton’s current Democratic primary opponent, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has pushed her to demand the DNC reinstate the lobbyist contribution ban. Clinton is already the top recipient of money from lobbyists in the 2016 campaign, the New York Times reported.

One of the lobbyists headlining the upcoming event, Elmendorf, donated $33,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund in October, months before the DNC said publicly it had lifted its contribution ban. A former chief of staff to then-Democratic House leader Richard Gephardt, Elmendorf is registered to lobby for Wall Street mega-bank Citigroup and entertainment and media company News Corporation.

Records show that Elmendorf previously lobbied for Goldman Sachs — a firm that’s been criticized by Sanders, and which paid Clinton $675,000 in speaking fees. (She has refused to release transcripts of those speeches.) Elmendorf also lobbied Congress on behalf of the Colombian government to pass the Colombia Free Trade Agreement — a deal that Clinton opposed before pressing lawmakers to support it in her role as secretary of state. Elmendorf has raised $172,320 worth of donations for Clinton's campaign, according to Yahoo.

Both Elmendorf and Forbes — a founding partner at Forbes-Tate — have represented telecom giant Verizon as it’s fought the Obama administration’s net neutrality rules, which would prevent internet providers from blocking or slowing access to some websites.

Though Clinton bragged that drug companies dislike her, her supporter Forbes — a former chief of staff to Democratic Sen. Max Baucus — lobbies for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the primary trade association representing the industry in Washington. In 2011, PhRMA paid Bill Clinton $200,000 for a speech while the organization was lobbying the Hillary Clinton-led State Department. PhRMA has pressed for the proposed 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership. Clinton and her staff supported the pact, but she reversed her position after becoming a presidential candidate, and she now opposes the deal.

Brophy, a managing director at the Glover Park Group, has lobbied the Obama administration and Congress for banking giant JPMorgan Chase. She’s also advocated for energy company Exelon on federal environmental rules. Records show that Brophy and Elmendorf have worked with the National Football League in its lobbying on issues related to player safety. Brophy’s biography says she worked as a top White House staffer in the Clinton administration, as well as a staffer to two Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

The Hillary Victory Fund event also lists Ann Castagnetti as a co-host of the event next month. Her husband, David, is a co-founder of Mehlman Castagnetti, where he’s represented clients like Walmart. Clinton was once a Walmart board member, and the company’s heir donated $353,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund. Castagnetti lobbied lawmakers for Valeant Pharmaceuticals, which disclosed Monday it’s being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While joint fundraising committees are designed to collect donations and split them among their designated beneficiaries, the Washington Post recently reported that “states have yet to see a financial windfall” from the Hillary Victory Fund, even as it’s been a boon to Clinton and the national party.

By Andrew Perez and David Sirota
http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/hillary-clinton-2016-dc-lobbyists-set-raise-cash-hillary-victory-fund-2327589

She knew enough to judge who would benefit and where the burdens would lay. She met with and lobbied with many, many foreign ministers on Obama's behalf as Secretary of State. She was very committed to the TPP. You'd have to be very naive to think otherwise.

she should be lobbying congress to vote against it. That she hasn't yet is confusing.

Confusing? Really? she has got a lot of unwinding to do...


Here are 45 instances when she approvingly invoked the trade bill about which she is now expressing concerns:

1. January 31, 2013: Remarks on American Leadership at the Council on Foreign Relations

"First and foremost, this so-called pivot has been about creative diplomacy:Like signing a little-noted treaty of amity and cooperation with ASEAN that opened the door to permanent representation and ultimately elevated a forum for engaging on high-stakes issues like the South China Sea. We've encouraged India's "Look East" policy as a way to weave another big democracy into the fabric of the Asia Pacific. We've used trade negotiations over the Trans-Pacific Partnership to find common ground with a former adversary in Vietnam. And the list goes on."

2. January 18, 2013: Remarks With Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida

"We also discussed the Trans-Pacific Partnership and we shared perspectives on Japan's possible participation, because we think this holds out great economic opportunities to all participating nations."

3. November 29, 2012: Remarks at the Foreign Policy Group's "Transformational Trends 2013 Forum"

"...let me offer five big-ticket agenda items that we absolutely have to get right as well. This starts with following through on what is often called our pivot to the Asia Pacific, the most dynamic region in our rapidly changing world. Much of the attention so far has been on America's increasing military engagement. But it's important that we also emphasize the other elements of our strategy. In a speech in Singapore last week, I laid out America's expanding economic leadership in the region, from new trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership to stepped-up efforts on behalf of American businesses."

"...We are welcoming more of our neighbors, including Canada and Mexico, into the Trans-Pacific Partnership process. And we think it's imperative that we continue to build an economic relationship that covers the entire hemisphere for the future."

4. November 17, 2012: Delivering on the Promise of Economic Statecraft

"And with Singapore and a growing list of other countries on both sides of the Pacific, we are making progress toward finalizing a far-reaching new trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The so-called TPP will lower barriers, raise standards, and drive long-term growth across the region. It will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and establish strong protections for workers and the environment. Better jobs with higher wages and safer working conditions, including for women, migrant workers and others too often in the past excluded from the formal economy will help build Asia's middle class and rebalance the global economy. Canada and Mexico have already joined the original TPP partners. We continue to consult with Japan. And we are offering to assist with capacity building, so that every country in ASEAN can eventually join. We welcome the interest of any nation willing to meet 21st century standards as embodied in the TPP, including China."

5. November 15, 2012: Remarks at Techport Australia

"...we need to keep upping our game both bilaterally and with partners across the region through agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP. Australia is a critical partner. This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment."

6. November 14, 2012: Remarks With Australian Foreign Minister Robert Carr, Australian Defense Minister Stephen Smith, and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta

"Our diplomats work side by side at regional organizations to address shared security challenges and hammer out new economic agreements, and we congratulate Australia upon becoming a new nonpermanent member of the Security Council. Our growing trade across the region, including our work together to finalize the Trans-Pacific Partnership, binds our countries together, increases stability, and promotes security."

7. November 14, 2012: Remarks at the Opening of the AUSMIN Ministerial

"That means finalizing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will lower trade barriers, raise labor and environmental standards, and drive growth across the region. And it includes, of course, working closely together at the upcoming East Asia Summit to advance a shared agenda."

8. September 8, 2012: Remarks at APEC CEO Summit

"That means pushing governments to support high-standard trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, to drop harmful protectionist policies. It means playing by the rules, respecting workers, and opening doors qualified women. And most of all, it means doing what you do best: build, hire, and grow."

9. August 31, 2012: Remarks With New Zealand Prime Minister Key

PRIME MINISTER KEY: "Secretary Clinton and I discussed the broad range of issues in the Asia Pacific region as we look towards the APEC summit in Russia in around 10 days time. New Zealand warmly supports the United States rebalancing towards the Asia-Pacific and we welcome the opportunities to cooperate further. In that context, we discussed our ongoing efforts to negotiate, alongside a number of other countries, a Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement."

...

SECRETARY CLINTON: "I'm also very committed to expanding investment and trade in the region, in pursuit of sustainable economic growth. Later today, I'll meet with local pearl vendors from here in the Cook Islands who are running their businesses while also protecting marine resources."

10. July 13, 2012: Remarks to the Lower Mekong Initiative Women's Gender Equality and Empowerment Dialogue

"We've also made workers rights a centerpiece of a new far-reaching trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. We are working with Vietnam, Malaysia, Australia, Canada, Mexico, and others in these negotiations."

11. July 10, 2012: Remarks With Foreign Minister Pham Binh Minh After Their Meeting

"So we're working on expanding it through a far-reaching, new regional trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would lower trade barriers while raising standards on everything from labor conditions to environmental protection to intellectual property. Both of our countries will benefit. And in fact, economists expect that Vietnam would be among the countries under the Trans-Pacific Partnership to benefit the most. And we hope to finalize this agreement by the end of the year."

12. July 10, 2012: Remarks at American Chamber of Commerce Reception and Commercial Signings

"Domestic and international businesses alike continue to face rules that restrict their activities, and that, in turn, deters investment and slows growth. So we are encouraging the Government of Vietnam to keep on the path of economic and administrative reform to open its markets to greater private investment. And through the Trans-Pacific Partnership, we're working with Vietnam and seven other nations to lower trade barriers throughout the region, as we ensure the highest standards for labor, environmental, and intellectual property protections. Vietnam was an early entrant to the TPP, and we're hoping we can finalize the agreement this year. And the economic analysis is that of all the countries that will be participating -- Australia, Canada, Mexico, others -- of all the countries participating in the TPP, Vietnam stands to benefit the most. So we're hoping to really see this agreement finalized and then watch it take off."

13. July 8, 2012: Remarks With Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba

"We also discussed the opportunity to strengthen our economic relationship, and the United States welcomes Japan's interest in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which we think will connect economies throughout the region, making trade and investment easier, spurring exports, creating jobs. The TPP is just one element of our increased focus on the Asia Pacific, but it is important that we recognize that the Japanese-American relationship is really at the cornerstone of everything we are doing in the Asia Pacific. We are not only treaty allies; we are friends and partners with common interests and shared values."

14. April 30, 2012: Remarks With Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Philippines Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario, and Philippines Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin After Their Meeting

"Finally, we discussed the maturing economic relationship between our countries as well as our shared commitment to enhanced development, trade, and investment. We would like to see the Philippines join the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade community. The foreign secretary raised the Philippines' interest in seeking passage of the Save our Industries Act, and we have conveyed that message to the United States Congress."

15. April 12, 2012: Remarks at the White House Conference on Connecting the Americas

"Now President Obama and I have said many times that this will be America's Pacific century, and we are focused on the broader Pacific. But remember, the Pacific runs from the Indian Ocean to the western shores of Latin America. We see this as one large area for our strategic focus. That's why we're working with APEC; that's why we're creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership. We recognize the mutual benefits of engagement between the Americas and the rest of the Pacific."

16. April 10, 2012: Forrestal Lecture at the Naval Academy

"As part of that same trip last November, the President built momentum for a new far-reaching trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership that we are negotiating with eight other countries in the Asia-Pacific region. This agreement is not just about eliminating barriers to trade, although that is crucial for boosting U.S. exports and creating jobs here at home. It's also about agreeing on the rules of the road for an integrated Pacific economy that is open, free, transparent, and fair. It will put in place strong protections for workers, the environment, intellectual property, and innovation -- all key American values. And it will cover emerging issues such as the connectivity of regional supply chains, the competitive impact of state-owned enterprises, and create trade opportunities for more small-and-medium-sized businesses."

17. April 21, 2012: Keynote Address At Global Business Conference

"Big or small, we're standing up for an economic system that benefits everyone, like when our Embassy in Manila worked with Filipino authorities on new intellectual property protections or when our negotiators ensure that the new Trans-Pacific Partnership requires that state-owned enterprises compete under the same rules as private companies."

18. February 1, 2012: Remarks With Singaporean Foreign Minister and Minister for Law K. Shanmugam

"This is a very consequential relationship. The multidimensional growth of our relationship with Singapore is an example of the importance that the United States sets on strengthening our engagement in the Asia Pacific. We are working together on a full range of issues, including moving forward on a high-quality trade agreement through the Trans-Pacific Partnership process."

19. December 19, 2011: Remarks With Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba After Their Meeting

"The minister and I also discussed a number of bilateral and regional issues and reviewed the close and ongoing collaboration between Japan and the United States in the aftermath of last March's earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear crisis. We discussed Japan's recent move to pursue consultations on joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations to resolve longstanding trade concerns in order to deepen the economic ties to the benefit of both our countries. I also urged that Japan take decisive steps so that it accedes to The Hague Convention on International Parental Child Abduction and address outstanding cases."

20. November 18, 2011: Remarks at ASEAN Business and Investment Summit

"Now let me describe briefly four ways that we want to work with you: first, by lowering trade barriers; second, by strengthening the investment climate; third, by pursuing commercial diplomacy; and fourth, by supporting entrepreneurs. We're excited about the innovative trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP. That would bring economies from across the Pacific, developed and developing alike, into a single trading community, not only to create more growth, but better growth."

21. November 16, 2011: Presentation of the Order of Lakandula, Signing of the Partnership for Growth And Joint Press Availability With Philippines Foreign Secretary Albert Del Rosario

"Together we hope to deliver an array of benefits to the people, including more foreign investment to create new jobs, a more streamlined court system that can deliver justice and protect local businesses, better services, and more resources to fight poverty. Over time, these steps will better position the Philippines to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which we hope will dramatically increase trade and investment among the peoples of the Pacific."

22. November 10, 2011: America's Pacific Century

"There is new momentum in our trade agenda with the recent passage of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement and our ongoing work on a binding, high-quality Trans-Pacific Partnership, the so-called TPP. The TPP will bring together economies from across the Pacific, developed and developing alike, into a single 21st century trading community. A rules-based order will also be critical to meeting APEC's goal of eventually creating a free trade area of the Asia Pacific."

23. October 14, 2011: Economic Statecraft

One of America's great successes of the past century was to build a strong network of relationships and institutions across the Atlantic -- an investment that continues to pay off today. One of our great projects in this century will be to do the same across the Pacific. Our Free Trade Agreement with South Korea, our commitment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, are clear demonstrations that we are not only a resident military and diplomatic power in Asia, we are a resident economic power and we are there to stay."

24. September 15, 2011: Celebrating 60 years of the U.S.-Australia Alliance

"We are working to encourage trade through the Trans-Pacific Partnership and through APEC, whose leaders the President will be hosting this fall in Hawaii. Together, we are strengthening regional institutions like the East Asia Summit and ASEAN. And as Secretary Panetta will explain, our military relationship is deepening and becoming even more consequential."

25. July 25, 2011: Remarks on Principles for Prosperity in the Asia-Pacific

"That is the spirit behind the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the so-called TPP, which we hope to outline by the time of APEC in November, because this agreement will bring together economies from across the Pacific—developed and developing alike—into a single trading community."

26. July 20, 2011: Remarks on India and the United States: A Vision for the 21st Century

"The United States is pushing forward on comprehensive trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership and our free trade agreement with South Korea. We are also stepping up our commercial diplomacy and pursuing a robust economic agenda at APEC. India, for its part, has concluded or will soon conclude new bilateral economic partnerships with Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, South Korea, and others. The more our countries trade and invest with each other and with other partners, the more central the Asia Pacific region becomes to global commerce and prosperity, and the more interest we both have in maintaining stability and security. As the stakes grow higher, we should use our shared commitment to make sure that we have maritime security and freedom of navigation. We need to combat piracy together. We have immediate tasks that we must get about determining."

27. May 17, 2011: Secretary Clinton's Remarks With New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully

"We looked ahead to the East Asia summit where President Obama will participate for the first time, and the United States will send our largest, most senior delegation ever to the Pacific Island Forum in New Zealand later this year. We talked about developments in Fiji, and both New Zealand and the United States agree that the military junta must take steps to return Fiji to democracy. And we agree on the importance of pursuing negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will provide a free trade agreement for nine countries across the region, including both of ours. We're making steady progress on this. We hope to be able to have the negotiations complete by the time we all meet in Hawaii for APEC toward the end of this year."

28. May 2, 2011: Remarks With Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd After Their Meeting

"And both of us understand the benefits of deeper economic integration and fair trade. Minister Rudd was very influential in helping us to work toward a greater, more relevant involvement in the Pacific-Asian institutions, such as joining the East Asian Summit. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is exploring ways to expand opportunity, is critical, and APEC and ASEAN are two other organizations where we work together."

29. April 17, 2011: Remarks at the American Chamber of Commerce Breakfast

"We will be hosting the 2011 APEC summit in Hawaii later this year. We are pushing to advance economic integration, remove trade barriers, and make sure that our national regulations line up in a way that encourages trade. We are also working hard on the trans-Pacific partnership, a cutting edge regional free trade agreement that would eventually cover an area responsible for over 40 percent of global trade."

30. March 18, 2011: Remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on Latin America

"As countries step up on the global stage, they will make essential contributions to helping all of us meet some of those most important challenges. Mexico, for example, made a crucial contribution to the fight against climate change through its remarkable leadership in Cancun last year. Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina in the G-20; Chile and Mexico in the OECD; Chile and Peru in the Trans-Pacific Partnership; and along with Mexico in APEC, these are all helping to build a foundation for balanced global growth, a transparent global economy, and broad-based opportunity. "

31. March 9, 2011: Remarks at the First Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum

"The United States is also making important progress on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will bring together nine APEC economies in a cutting-edge, next generation trade deal, one that aims to eliminate all trade tariffs by 2015 while improving supply change, saving energy, enhancing business practices both through information technology and green technologies. To date, the TPP includes Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Malaysia, Peru, Vietnam and the United States."

32. January 14, 2011: Inaugural Richard C. Holbrooke Lecture on a Broad Vision of U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century

"We are taking steps to ensure that our defense posture reflects the complex and evolving strategic environment in the region and we are working to ratify a free trade agreement with South Korea and pursuing a regional agreement through the Trans-Pacific Partnership to help create new opportunities for American companies and support new jobs here at home. Those goals will be front and center when we host the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum in Hawaii later this year."

33: November 7, 2010: Remarks at U.S. Trade Promotion Event

"Now, we've seen how bilateral trade benefits both sides. Our challenge now is to broaden those benefits. That means we have to look for even more opportunities to increase trade and investment between us. And it means that we work harder to broaden the benefits of trade even beyond our two countries. Australia is an important partner in negotiating the ambitious new multilateral trade deal called the Trans Pacific Partnership. Over time, we hope to deliver a groundbreaking agreement that connects countries as diverse as Peru and Vietnam with America and Australia to create a new free trade zone that can galvanize commerce, competition, and growth across the entire Pacific region."

34. November 7, 2010: Speech and Townterview with Australian Broadcasting Company

"To continue this progress, we are both pressing ahead on something called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. It's an ambitious multilateral free trade agreement that would bring together many more nations of the Pacific Rim. Australia and the United States are helping to lead those negotiations and we're also working through APEC, which the United States will host in Hawaii in 2011. We see that as a pivotal year to drive progress on internal economic changes that will open more markets and make sure that any growth is more sustainable and inclusive. And finally, we believe that the United States and Australia have been at the forefront of organize the entire region for the future."

35. November 5, 2010: Christchurch Trade Reception Hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce

"We are looking for ways to broaden and deepen our economic ties and build on the strong foundation we already have. And we think that the Trans-Pacific Partnership is a very exciting opportunity. This multilateral free trade agreement would bring together nine countries located in the Asia Pacific region -- New Zealand and the United States, Australia, Chile, Singapore, Brunei, Peru, Vietnam, and Malaysia. By eliminating most tariffs and other trade barriers, and embracing productive policies on competition, intellectual property, and government procurement, we can spur greater trade and integration not only among the participating countries, but as a spur to the entire region."

36. November 4, 2010: Remarks With New Zealand Prime Minister John Phillip Key and New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray Stuart McCully

" Well, let me say that we discussed at some length, both the foreign minister and I and then the prime minister and I, the way forward on trade. We are very committed to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and New Zealand, again, is playing a leading role. And we want to expedite the negotiations as much as possible. So we are exploring ways that we can try to drive this agenda. I am absolutely convinced that opening up markets in Asia amongst all of us and doing so in a way that creates win-win situations so that people feel that trade is in their interests."

37. November 3, 2010: Remarks at the Pratt & Whitney Trade Event

"That is why the United States is very pleased by Malaysia's decision to join the negotiations for the Trans Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership. This regional trade agreement will promote shared success by expanding markets and building a level playing field for workers in every country that participates."

38. November 2, 2010: Remarks with Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman

"Finally, we are pleased that Malaysia joined last month's negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership. That is a pact that would expand markets and create a level playing field for people in every country that does participate. I know there are tough issues to work out, as there always are with these agreements, but Malaysia's leadership in this region for greater economic growth is absolutely essential."

39. November 2, 2010: Secretary Clinton's Meeting with Kuala Lumpur Embassy Staff and Their Families

"And I think we have tremendous opportunities here. But I know when I leave tomorrow, the work to make those opportunities into realities falls to all of you. So I know a lot is expected of you, but we're going to be doing even more in Malaysia. We have a lot of plans for educational exchanges. We have some very exciting work on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, enhancing trade and investment (inaudible) that will promote closer cooperation."

40. November 2, 2010: Townterview Hosted by Media Prima in Malaysia

"So in our meetings with your government officials and even in my conversation with the prime minister earlier today, we of course talked about our bilateral relationship but we also talked about the role that Malaysia is playing in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a new free trade agreement that will enhance market access, but also working to support Afghanistan and the people there with training and medical services."

41. October 30, 2010:Remarks With Vietnamese Foreign Minister Pham Gia Khiem

"In trade, our two countries have already made great progress. Fifteen years ago, our bilateral trade was about $450 million. Last year it was more than $15 billion. And the foreign minister and the prime minister and I talked about how to expand this trade relationship, including through the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The United States, Vietnam, and seven other countries finished a third round of negotiations on the TPP this month and we hope that Vietnam can conclude it in internal process and announce its status as a full member of the partnership soon."

42. October 28, 2010: America's Engagement in the Asia-Pacific

"We are also pressing ahead with negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an innovative, ambitious multilateral free trade agreement that would bring together nine Pacific Rim countries, including four new free trade partners for the United States, and potentially others in the future. 2011 will be a pivotal year for this agenda. Starting with the Korea Free Trade Agreement, continuing with the negotiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, working together for financial rebalancing at the G-20, and culminating at the APEC Leaders Summit in Hawaii, we have a historic chance to create broad, sustained, and balanced growth across the Asia Pacific and we intend to seize that."

43. September 8, 2010: Remarks on United States Foreign Policy

"On the economic front, we've expanded our relationship with APEC, which includes four of America's top trading partners and receives 60 percent of our exports. We want to realize the benefits from greater economic integration. In order to do that, we have to be willing to play. To this end, we are working to ratify a free trade agreement with South Korea, we're pursuing a regional agreement with the nations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and we know that that will help create new jobs and opportunities here at home."

44. July 22, 2010: Remarks With Vietnam Deputy Prime Minister And Foreign Minister Pham Gia Khiem

"And I am very much supportive of Vietnam's participation as a full member in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. As Vietnam embarks on labor and other reforms, the American businesses that are investing in Vietnam can provide expertise that will aid Vietnam's economic and infrastructure development."

45. January 12, 2010: Remarks on Regional Architecture in Asia: Principles and Priorities

"In addition, the United States is engaging in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade negotiations as a mechanism for improving linkages among many of the major Asia-Pacific economies. And to build on political progress, we must support efforts to protect human rights and promote open societies."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/

I don't know if this qualifies as a failure to you(although it does to me), but Clinton and her State Department staff more than supported TPP. Of course she reversed her position in October and now opposes the deal. Question is, how strongly will she speak out against it now that she is embracing more of Obama's actions and Sanders is fading?

I used Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

The point remains that he has a good chance to go all the way to the nomination.

thanks, I did an edit... does that work?

Who's to say anything would change?




We could always hold out the hope that Jon Stewart will wiegh in before November...

That was great! the best case against Trump yet. And yet it seems that no amount of Trump truthout is going to beat him - he's now 49% in the latest CNN national GOP poll.

Kudos to Gabbard... that this woman had to resign as Vice Chair to say good things about Sanders is significant.



Why did Tulsi Gabbard just endorse Bernie Sanders?

On Sunday, a rising-star Democratic congresswoman effectively defected from her party establishment to join the opposition.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) announced on NBC's "Meet the Press" that she's stepping down from her post as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, which requires her to be neutral in the primary, and is endorsing Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.).

It's a move that makes little sense on the surface — especially coming mere hours after Hillary Clinton's shellacking of Sanders in South Carolina's primary. But digging deeper into Gabbard's unconventional and sometimes combative approach to politics, her alliance with Sanders starts to add up. Like the man she's endorsing for president, Gabbard is a wildcard who is willing to put her future with the Democratic Party on the line to speak out against it.

Gabbard is probably well aware that her Sanders endorsement could harm her standing within the party's power structure. But from what we've seen from the two-term congressman, she probably doesn't care.

In October, Gabbard got into a nasty back and forth with DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) over the DNC's six primary debates. Gabbard thought the party should hold more; Wasserman Schultz suggested that Gabbard shouldn't go to that week's debate in Las Vegas. (Wasserman Schultz eventually agreed to include four more primary debates in the calendar.)

Before that, Gabbard earned appearances on Fox News and a glowing profile in the conservative National Review after very publicly blasting President Obama's failure to say "radical Islam" and suggesting that he's weak on Syria.

Despite her somewhat hawkish views on terrorism in the Middle East, Gabbard indicated Sunday that she's endorsing Sanders mainly because of his more cautious approach to military engagement abroad.

"As a veteran of two Middle East deployments, I know firsthand the cost of war,” Gabbard says in a video she cut for the Sanders campaign. “I know how important it is that our commander in chief has the sound judgment required … to know when to use America's military power and when not to use that power."

Democratic Party brass is probably somewhat relieved that Gabbard broke off their tumultuous relationship before it dragged either side down any further.

"Today, I accepted Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard's resignation as a Vice-Chair of the DNC," Wasserman Schultz said in a statement, adding she looks forward to working with Gabbard in the future to ensure Democrats win the White House. "The Democratic National Committee is grateful for her service."

Gabbard and Sanders probably won't stop raising havoc for the party, but at least Gabbard is no longer doing it from a leadership post within. And that's probably a good thing as far as both sides are concerned.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/28/why-did-this-top-dnc-official-just-endorse-bernie-sanders/?postshare=8321456709165959&tid=ss_tw

The broad difference between "The Big Short"(4 Oscar nominations) and "The Inside Job"(Oscar winner in 2010) is the cast of characters. The former is a simple entertaining story while the latter is much more detailed and compelling narrative. See for yourself,

https://archive.org/details/cpb20120505a

All my pick has to do is shoot 52 tomorrow and he's in the mix.

What's going on at MSNBC ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxy58uSzV1c


MSNBC's Harris-Perry Says She Won’t Appear On Her Show After Pre-Emptions
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/melissa-harris-perry-msnbc-walk-off


MSNBC Assisted Suicide Watch Continues
http://crooksandliars.com/2015/12/msnbc-assisted-suicide-watch-continues

I don't know if Mussolini did it this way, but President Trump plans to change US libel laws making it easier to sue news agencies.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/26/media/donald-trump-libel-laws/

The blanket was thrown over the dem party long ago...

Remember "Hope and Change"?... the New Progressive Era?

The key 2016 issue is outrage over a rigged system by special interests. There's a reason Hillary doesn't get it - Bill Curry
http://www.salon.com/2016/02/23/its_the_corruption_stupid_hillarys_too_compromised_to_see_what_donald_trump_understands/

far be it from me disrupt the Clinton Coronation, but people are pissed with politics as usual, which is why we're seeing the candidacies of Sanders and Trump blossom.

Rumor has it, the GOP establishment is talking about organizing to stop Trump before he picks up too much momentum.

It is Sanders’ great advantage; on the overarching issue of the election he alone among all the candidates wants what we want: an end to politics as we know it. http://goo.gl/stMUOq

Phil Mickelson, thanks.

Transcripts of HRC's speeches are closer to being released.

(...)
By providing the transcripts to a carefully-vetted reporter, the Clinton camp would likely to maintain some control over the way the resulting story is presented. This is not to suggest the reporter—if this reporter is even real!—would allow a Clinton spokesperson to dictate the precise description and framing of the speech’s contents. It’s just to point out that such an article—if the article ever materializes!—would almost certainly feature detailed comments from Clinton’s camp about the speeches’ most noteworthy or controversial passages. Considering her recalcitrance thus far, we’re guessing there’s more than few of those.

It’s true, of course, that releasing the transcripts at all is a much-needed demonstration of transparency from a candidate who often seems allergic to the whole concept of transparency. But the act of publication is unlikely to mitigate the troubling fact that Clinton didn’t want them published in the first place. Indeed, if the speeches’ contents are sufficiently unsettling, it’s easy to see a new accusation gaining currency: That Clinton authorized the transcripts’ release only after the Nevada caucuses had vastly increased the odds of her nomination over an opponent who has repeatedly and enthusiastically criticized Wall Street’s avarice.

In any case, it’s hard to see how Clinton doesn’t release the speech transcripts at this point. Regardless of her campaign’s underlying strategy (or lack thereof), the corner into which she has painted herself doesn’t provide her many other options.
http://gawker.com/which-reporter-has-copies-of-hillary-clinton-s-secret-g-1760570910

Too many holes and foibles in that reply. Have you got a better answer than,

nothing is "always"(...) but currently and for as long as it has existed, government has been a sinister force.

That's a contradiction in terms, not to mention nitpicking the point,


And what's this?...

really hilarious that gov lovers think because someone decides to "serve" in gov they automatically become saints with no self serve at heart... BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!

That reads like the nihilists in the Big Lebowski. What does that even mean, SilverSurfer? If you care to explain, remember there are adults in the room.

and Bob Dole must be high on applesauce.

Were it so simple. I think you read it with an eccentric fondness for Reaganites who still insist that government is always a sinister force.

To me, the article was more an explanation how politicians get elected -- by making friends and raising money... how trade deals benefit higher corporate profits with no regard for labor... bottom line - our government today looks more like a plutocracy.