Another exciting day and a wonderful close at .0001. Thanks Tony! Always looking out for your investors! Can't wait for your next podcast!

Please feel free to share the massive, gargantuan, puzzle piece we all missed that makes this horrible mess logical.

That's what has been said both times MMX has been re-vamped...we were told both times that MMX was getting redone...both times, zilch. Same old crappy used car, new paint and a some air fresheners. Nowhere close to what we were told...nowhere close to what Tony told me on the phone...

Not sure what to do with all this volume...starting to feel a lot like Tony's SREH that he sold to a Canadian and never got paid for and didn't want to pursue in court because the guy was Canadian. I wonder if history will repeat itself.

I'm talking about the current versions of both FilmRookie and MMX. Both contain the same code, share the same images and are the same website.

Shared a starting point? Identical code isn't a starting point...it's a carbon copy. But then...why share the same images? Why is FilmRookie stuff still being hosted on MusicMatrix if it was sold by ENTI to EUOT? Why were we told the site was getting COMPLETELY REDONE VIA A COMPLICATED AND SUPER TIME CONSUMING PROCESS WITH LOTS OF CODE AND OTHER STUFF THAT THE "PROGRAMMERS" WERE WORKING ON?

Reality is...you're looking at the same exact website you were back in 2010...with a new skin...the core...the part of the website that one would call intellectual property is identical to what it was...it still has ApogeeINVENT's branding too...and reference to CameraCrew Inc...Hell, FilmRookie even has "Rick DiBiase" in the metatags...

Something stinks...

Why is the FilmRookie logo being used on MMX?

Why does the FilmRookie html source-code contain references to MMX?

Why does the MusicMatrix html source-code contain references to FilmRookie?

Why are all of these companies tangled together like a pile of twine?

This is the 2nd re-launch...we've been here before, a year ago, with all the same "soons" we're still waiting for...we've been hearing about the "next level" for a while...well, if that NEXT LEVEL is anything like the relaunch of MMX I'm not very excited...I view the relaunch as a precursor of things to come, underwhelming.

Thomas is really bad with time-frames...maybe he meant months...?

Can't wait to hear more about BRANDWIDTH!

Ok...but other than Tony and people on the board...how do you know that shorts exist? Where did you find this proof?

Ok, but when? This has been said now for over a year and a half. Yes, Tony made mention of it in a podcast once. Has it been talked about since? Tony has said lots of things in podcasts...and on the phone...

The share structure and constant fumbles by the company among other things is the cause of the PPS, imo...

When are the shorts going to cover?

It's like MMX, Round 2...this is all deja-vu...a lot of us have been here before...what a horrible ride...heh.

But remember...it's what he haven't seen yet that really matters...these companies are all way to similar right down to the product...its weird...

Good job, SREH!

You can reach him by calling the number in the iBox...877-233-9492

We know he reads the boards, he's made direct reference to things said on here in the past...

Can you give examples of this "filling in"? The filling in I'm seeing is no Videos being visible under the video tab currently.

From what we have seen so far, DUTV doesn't even have a product. The demo you watched is a product called http://www.icblivetv.com/ and they have nothing to do with DUTV or PTEL. Have you tried contacting them and confirming this?

Even if it was their product...it isn't better, the visual quality by today's standards is severely lacking...the video players on DUTV's demo page clearly state 480p and HD OFF which is a far cry from the HD demo that we were told we were getting...

So...the part of the big hold up was caused by a 'math issue'?

Everybody get out your abacus!

Maybe he's too busy battling in MS Paint trying to finish ROAR so he can show us investors what he's been hacking at with his "Web1.0 for Dummies" book.

1...2...3 strikes you're out at the old ball game!

My reply to his post was in response to him saying we should click on the ads to help PTEL and nothing more...

I know what else is planned, trust me, I have a very long memory and I remember all the things that have been talked about and discussed. I think it's just that, me remembering everything, that is wearing my patients pretty thin...because some of the things don't come true and for some reason a few people are perfectly fine with saying one thing and doing another...I'm not OK with that...I'm not OK with a lot of things I'm finding...

I'll give you a empty box in trade for your 38M shares...seems like a fair trade considering the circumstances.

Organized ad clicking will get their google account suspended and even removed completely. If you don't belive me then I suggest you do a bit of googling and read up on it.

Even if that did work...a couple hundred clicks won't provide enough revenue or results you are expecting...cost per click payouts are pretty small...it all depends on the type of ad and payouts vary but its still just a drop in the bucket...

You are mistaken...some of the complainers here are people that work in the industry Tony is trying to be involved in. Some of the complainers would be very happy if Tony made some correct dicisions and didn't tell fairy tails on the phone.

Don't know how I missed this one...also in the source of musicmatrix.com

I remember http://www.cameracrewinc.com/ ...it was a pretty nice web page and we were told it was a subsidiary of ENTI...I guess they went out of business or closed or maybe Rick just took the website down?

I wonder what Rick has been up to? Oh Rick...where'd ya go? Tony said you were still working with MMX, just not running the company anymore...

It's really fun to paste the source code from musicmatrix.com and apps.v2solutions.com:8080/filmrookie/index.php in a code comparison tool...it's the same site/code/original developer, lol!

The source tells a better story than the site itself...

You think after the 2nd time of being late on a podcast...you'd learn to not say anything until it's posted...that's just my thinking...not sure if i'm being silly or not...

Sometimes I think everyone involved is just trolling us...that's what it seems like...because some of this stuff is orchestrated so poorly that is's almost funny...maybe ENTI should change it's logo to:



When the podcast is released will it finally have Thomas talking about mailing even more documents to the TA, FINRA and Brookfield Zoo?

That isn't HD, we've been over this and for some reason the facts remain grasped...maybe this will help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video

That demo is not HD and that's not even DUTV, it's http://www.icblivetv.com/ (HINT: CLICK THE LITTLE ICON/LOGO IN THE UPPER LEFT CORNER OF THE VIDEO) and they have nothing to do with DUTV or any of the companies being discussed here. That demo is obviously much lower than 720 vertical lines of resolution...this is something you can see without any kind of tools or equipment...I won't even get into the lossy quality of the video or the fact that the video player says 480p and the last video even says "HD is off"...c'mon....

Tony has said and told me on several occasions "connect the dots"...a lot of the stuff he says like that can be taken both ways and all the dots I'm connecting are drawing a pretty awful picture...it started out as a beautiful flower but it's just turning into a crappy rain cloud...

It's this kind of stuff that makes me think Tony is pandering to the 40+ crowd who doesn't understand this stuff...because seriously, this is basic, common knowledge that can visually be confirmed by watching the awful DUTV video you posted...

What is going on here?

what gives you the indication that something was erased?

nothing was erased and i will gladly forward you the email. i pasted the entire raw email from top to bottom.

Tony says:

When did SREH's assets transfer to PTEL? Show me...

Last post of the day...but I'll wait for information regarding SREH and it's products being moved to PTEL.

Tony says it is because the products belonged/were owned to/by him and not SREH...if they belonged to him and not SREH...then what did SREH have all along?

By the way...all of this "tony says" is from the phone conversation I had with him on the 11th.

So you're saying that BrightCove, a big player in video hosting, doesn't know what they are doing? What algorithm? You talking about video codecs? That's something quite different...and again, I'm sure BrightCove knows what they are doing...it's the other end of the equation that appears to not know what's going on...

Please read my post on the board related to the other company.

It must be the lack of company information, it must be the fact that the TA has ZERO information on SREH relating to the company contact, address, email, state, country, planet. It must be the fact that Tony said he was never paid for SREH and doesn't want to file suit because the guy was from Canada. Must be a lot of crap not adding up?

The only information the TA holds currently is the share structure...and even that sucks.

99% of my investment gone...IS A BIG DEAL.

Multiple companies 'related' at no bid...IS A BIG DEAL.

SREH no longer showing in my brogerage account...IS A BIG DEAL.

Tony saying he never got paid for SREH and not wanting to peruse because the buyer was from Canada...IS A BIG WTF?

I think the 62" 1080p 120Hz Samsung TV I have in my living room is plenty decent...was top of the line when I got it...wasn't cheap either...

I also think that IPS-based NEC display I have in my office at home is more than adequate to view web sites...

Maybe it has something to do with the abysmal ~360 vertical lines of resolution the uploaded videos on MusicMatrix have...that's probably it...don't be so quick to blame my equipment...

If you read my posts you'll see that I talked to Tony on the 11th of November and that I also called and left a message today for him. I also sent another email asking questions today as well...

And, yes, I have offered Tony help on several occasions...

This is why tony hires people (with the money we've given to him) that do know what they are doing...so that he can make educated decisions and roll out a product worth signing up for...

...like http://www.v2solution.com/ ...since that's the firm currently working on MusicMatrix or FilmRookie...or whatever you want to call it...

So because Tony doesn't know doesn't mean that v2solutions can't consult and guide him in the right direction...because right now it's obvious they aren't...so next we'll blame v2 because they couldn't meet Tony's standards, just like the last "2" versions of MusicMatrix...

Go show someone who does graphic design and web development for a living MusicMatrix. Come back here and post what they say word for word...even video tape or record it...

Like I said in my last post, I left Tony a message just for you...

I also just sent an email with all the questions I asked on iHub to Tony...just for you

Picture quality is better? It's worse than it was with VMIX. Did you watch any videos on the 'old' MusicMatrix? The quality of video is a definite step backwards, it can't be anymore visually obvious...

http://musicmatrix.com/videos.php?te_class=gallery_media&te_mode=view&te_key=108

Looks lossy as lossy can get...even on my 15" workstation monitor it is very blurry...

When I asked Tony on Twitter yesterday about it he said I need to get my facts straight and that what I was saying was "silly"...

He also said their lawyers squashed Apogee but that's not what Apogee said, that's nowhere close to what Apogee said.

Just to make you happy, I left Tony a message. Let's see if he calls back.

I'm not talking trash about it...I'm bringing up very valid questions and trying to figure out what they did with my money. There's nothing wrong with me asking questions about my investment and for you to assume I have no money in this is a joke. I've been around for a while, I've talked to a lot of people both on and off the board and I've screwed up some pretty close relationships because of this product.

I'm very concerned about where my money went. I have every right to be. I have every right to ask questions about my investment because these are questions that need answeres and shouldn't be ignored.

Have you called ApogeeINVENT? Have you talked to them?

ENTI sold FilmRookie to EOUT? Why is PTEL using FilmRookie's product and logo?

Why is all the code the same when we were specifically told the website was getting completely redone to meet Tony's quality standards...well, his standards must be pretty low if he didn't even fix the stuff he was complaining about because the site's foundation is exactly what it was...

I don't like being lied to on the phone...and Tony lied on the phone because he said THE SITE IS GETTING COMPLETELY REDONE, THIS IS A VERY COMPLICATED PROCESS, LOTS OF CODE NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN BLAH BLAH BLAH...no code was changed except for the commenting of VMIX stuff out and adding BrightCove's crappy SD flash player...

You're looking at the same website with new paint, not what you were told would be occurring...so yeah, I'll ask questions and continue to ask questions...because I don't like what I'm finding out about my investment...