Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bloria_Researcher, there you go for a nice break:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94631974
Another nice break for Gloria researcher:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94626144
Still another nice break for biotech_researcher:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94595297
Now that you have been so serious, I dare not to be kidding with you:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94631974
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94631974
The $50 question has been answered.
Please feel free to get tired of. Sorry, I can't help you regarding your tiredness.
****
What happened to Ariad during 10/1999 - 03/2000 will probably be repeated. By 03/2014, ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats. History repeats itself, doesn't it? Who knows?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94631974
The sentence saying "ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats" is actually for the shorts, not for the longs. The risk of shorting a stock is unlimited literately. $50 is a limited number, isn't? The risk may be much more than $50 for a short.
Any news will be good news because Ariad has run out of shoes to drop. Don't you think so? You don't have to count on it. However, counting on it or not counting on it is at your own risk. You will see what is going to happen.
Anyone worried about the class action suits?
"No. From a legal perspective, suits are without merit,...and no factual predicate. No fraud involved, ONLY a possible "leak" at FDA. Further, ARAID has insurance against lawsuits via a defense fund established by insuring carrier.
Lastly, what's really at issue here is NOT ARIAD, but what and how info was used to adversely affect the PPS," answered dfaduke on the YMB.
“I was terrified because this drug is my lifeline,” said Karen Linscott, a 48-year-old teacher from Eden Prairie, Minn. Her form of blood cancer — chronic myeloid leukemia — has been in remission for two and a half years since she began taking Iclusig as part of a clinical trial in Ann Arbor, Mich.
The FDA's intention seems to be about withdrawing the drug so the company can be destroyed, and so doctors fear their patients are going to die, and so patients panic.
"We have to see what the data holds," he said. "Any consideration of what we do has to put patient safety first. This is not about getting the drug back to the market so the company can do well."
Amp, "ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats" is actually for the shorts, not for the longs. The risk of shorting a stock is unlimited literately. $50 is a limited number, isn't? The risk may be more than $50+ for a short.
What happened to Ariad during 10/1999 - 03/2000 will probably be repeated. By 03/2014, ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats.
History repeats itself, doesn't it? Who knows?
What happened to Ariad during 10/1999 - 03/2000 will probably be repeated. By 03/2014, ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats. History repeats itself, doesn't it. Who knows?
Any news will be good news because Ariad has run out of shoes to drop. Don't you think so? You don't have to count on it. However, counting on it or not counting on it is at your own risk. You will see what is going to happen.
I am not a trader. I don't predict target price because I don't think it is predictable. If anybody interprets my statement above that way, it is his/her freedom. However, he/she should have noticed the word "probably" in my statement. Ariad's history tells that during the period of 10/1999 - 03/2000, ARIA rose more than 50 folds. History may or may not repeat itself. Who knows? When ARIA was at $25.40 in Oct, 2013, who predicted it would drop to $2.15 a year later? You were bullish back a year. you would have said $2.15 was off reality. However, it turned out that the reality was that people had to face the reality.
ARIA may reach $50. If it does happen, the shorts will have to face the reality. One usually doesn't realize reality until he/she faces it.
----
I was talking about another Moanrch who honestly said he was short:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94498509
Being bearish or bullish is perfectly OK. To be honest with you, the sentence saying "ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats" is actually for the shorts, not for the longs. The risk of shorting a stock is unlimited literately. $50 is a limited number, isn't? The risk may be more than $50 for a short.
I simply felt you should have specified your quote was not from the article you referred to.
I don't think people should go after each other here.
Have you jointed a lawsuit against Ariad? Haven't you sold your Ariad shares? Do you understand the logic behind my post now? You are welcomed to use the word "wacky" again.
If someone has not only sold his/her shares but also shorted before he/she joined a lawsuit, do you think such a person would like to see the rising of the share price?
If only every short is as honest as Moanrch!
The FDA's intention seems to be about withdrawing the drug so the company can be destroyed, and so doctors fear their patients are going to die, and so patients panic.
“I was terrified because this drug is my lifeline,” said Karen Linscott, a 48-year-old teacher from Eden Prairie, Minn. Her form of blood cancer — chronic myeloid leukemia — has been in remission for two and a half years since she began taking Iclusig as part of a clinical trial in Ann Arbor, Mich.
Certain old timer Ariad believers want to join a lawsuit against the company! Fortunately, the doctors' data will probably help Ariad rather than the law firms.
Do you think anyone, who want to join a lawsuit against Ariad, really look forward to the rising of Ariad's share price? I take leave to doubt it. This kind of dishonesty is Absolutely Disgusting.
This board has deteriorated beyond belief in br's words.
It's malevolent attempting to kill a lifesaving drug == attempting to kill the patients.
“What we don’t want to have happen is for a good drug, ponatinib, to be killed and not given to patients,” said Dr. Javid Moslehi, a co-director of the cardio-oncology program at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
For those interested in joining a lawsuit, which firm is the best one to jump on board?
This board has deteriorated beyond belief. There are no conspiracies, no jack booted thugs trying to take control.
I'm looking forward and hoping that the day will come where Ariad's share price will have risen to a point that all the conspiracy nonsense on this board will whither away and be forgotten.
The Europeans appear to be more intelligent than those at the FDA.
Any news will be good news because Ariad has run out of shoes to drop. Don't you think so? You don't have to count on it. However, Counting on it or not counting on it is at your own risk. You will see what is going to happen.
What happened to Ariad during 10/1999 - 03/2000 will probably be repeated. By 03/2014, ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats.
History repeats itself, doesn't it? Who knows?
Thanks, binchey!
For those interested in joining a lawsuit, which firm is the best one to jump on board?
I have to laugh at these class action suits.
Yes, the 2-Year FACE Trial Follow-Up by Dr. Cortes et al (25 doctors from many countries) concludes that
"Pancreatitis was the most common drug-related serious AE (5%); it occurred early and was primarily managed with dose modification, 1 pt discontinued. Serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular AEs occurred in 6%, 3%, and 2% of pts (drug-related: 2%, 1%, 1%)."
Great, BR! Thanks! Links, please?
She had the guts to write a letter to the Mass. senators while most of us here just beat around the bush.
Leave Grandma alone guyz. Her posts are definitely more interesting than the newbies here born after the flash crash. She had the guts to write a letter to the Mass. senators while most of us here just beat around the bush.
Have you got a good law firm and join a class action against Ariad, Biotech_Researcher? Good luck to you!
3 years ago, I counterattacked lax20m's personal attacks on this board, which was why I got banned. Frankly speaking, I don't mind being banned again as the result of my counterattacks against any new personal attacks.
Conspiracies? I don't know they are real or nonsense. I would not believe the conspiracy theory at all if someone who always speaks for Novartis did not attack the conspiracy theory constantly, or if a couple of posters did not constantly deny the existence of conspiracies or booted thugs.
So there could be conspiracies, and some posters on this board might be part of them. They could be the booted thugs themselves. Who knows? Evidences? Should conspiracies be real, evidences would be great!
There seem to be such posts somewhere as the following:
For those interested in joining a lawsuit, which firm is the best one to jump on board?
This board has deteriorated beyond belief. There are no conspiracies, no jack booted thugs trying to take control.
I'm looking forward and hoping that the day will come where Ariad's share price will have risen to a point that all the conspiracy nonsense on this board will whither away and be forgotten.
Euripides90, many people appreciate your DD and like your posts very much. Please keep on your great contribution.
Who is Gloria?
No, I won't do you that favor.
Any news will be good news because Ariad has run out of shoes to drop. Don't you think so? You don't have to count on it. However, Counting on it or not counting on it is at your own risk. You will see what is going to happen.
What happened to Ariad during 10/1999 - 03/2000 will probably be repeated. By 03/2014, ARIA may reach $50+ if history repeats.
History repeats itself, doesn't it? Who knows?
Attempting to kill a lifesaving drug is equivalent to attempting to kill patients.
Am I accusing a government agency or some ARIA shorts of murder?
BR, you're right. EGFR NSCLC requires a much higher dose; a lower dose may be good enough for ALK NSCLC.
Positive AP26113 progress:
Tapered dose steroids were used to resolve symptoms over 1 week, and patients restarted the drug at 90 mg/d without further pulmonary symptoms, he said. Future studies will employ a step-up approach, initiating the drug at 90 mg/d for 7 days before moving up to 180 mg/d.
Will Ariad restart AP26113 EGFR NSCLC study some day?
Hans Loland, who has organized an Internet group for those diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia, said patients are hoping Ariad and the FDA can quickly reach agreement: “We support the FDA and the job they have to do,” Loland said. But we want a balanced approach. Our concern is the longer this is dragged out, there are patients who are going to lose access to the drug and there are doctors who may not prescribe it to patients who could benefit.”
I would not believe the conspiracy theory at all if someone who always speaks for Novartis did not attack the conspiracy theory constantly
Details: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94531572
Nobody has accused the FDA of anything. The fact is the fact. The enormous gulf between the 2 SAE rates is the evidence.
lax20m accused mejs of being a paid pumper, which is off topic and against the policies of this board. Therefore, lax20m should be banned.
Lax20m, have you read the following post:
P.S. lax etc are part of this takedown which is why he lashed out at grandma.
Pulling Iclusig from the market will kill people. The doctors will not put all the people on it via an IND who should get it - and they will die prematurely.
Yes, doctors' data to be present at the 55th ASH will be helpful to Ariad, though not so helpful to the FDA:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94244121
Would the FDA's Pazdur attend the ASH and see what the data holds?
"We have to see what the data holds," Dr. Pazdur said. "Any consideration of what we do has to put patient safety first. This is not about getting the drug back to the market so the company can do well."
“The conclusions reached by the CHMP confirm a positive benefit-risk assessment for Iclusig after considering the most recent safety information.”
Lawsuit by ARIA aganist FDA & co would be appropriate raction - posted by biotech101 on YMB
If the FDA really was kind of an executioner for a big pharma player's secret plan, then they must be sued for this scandal. They would have to pay a huge amount for the destroyed trust and reputation of ARIA - could be triple the worth of it now in payments. Thereafter ARIAs SP would hit some distant galaxy...
We are trading as if Ariad is about to announce a lawsuit against 1) the FDA, 2) conspirators, 3) certain docs in the study 4) certain wall street types 5) some or all of the above.
Nobody has attacked the FDA. The fact is not delusion. The enormous gulf between the 2 SAE rates is the evidence.
I suggest you do what bigduke and mejs have suggested:
Report the FDA wrong-doing to your representatives in Congress and your 2 senators. Report it to the SEC and HHS OIG, too.
Report the FDA wrong-doing to your representatives in Congress and your 2 senators; Report it to the SEC and HHS OIG, too. --- aria_will_recover_soon's post on YMB
mpr120001: "I would look at the fraud created by the FDA and their employees who pushed this through. They need to be tried and put in front of the losers."
jjags6691: "FDA should be investigated some big pharma wanted this company out of the way. Fda works for big pharma not for safety of the american people it's all about money some big pharma paid the fda to pull the drug.:
jjags6691: "This is how stupid the fda is they pulled it because of the deaths these people were on their death beds to begin with. Are these clowns serious they need to be investigated?
If FDA has not tempered the data, they must have deliberately changed the definition of Serious Adverse Event to order to justify its intentionally wrong decision.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94531572
The FDA deliberately exaggerated the SAE rates, which is further evidenced by Dr. Cortes and colleagues recently:
“The incidence of all arterial thrombotic events, serious or not, was 17.1%.”
"Ponatinib was pulled by the FDA under VERY suspicious circumstances. They changed the definition of what constitutes an adverse event, then attributed every event to the drug, despite the fact that these patients were heavily pretreated and in BLAST phase. They came to the study at deaths door after failing all other options."
"At one time we thought the drug had a favorable risk-benefit profile," Dr. Pazdur said. "Now we have to be realistic and say that no longer exists."
"We have to see what the data holds," he said. "Any consideration of what we do has to put patient safety first. This is not about getting the drug back to the market so the company can do well."
“The conclusions reached by the CHMP confirm a positive benefit-risk assessment for Iclusig after considering the most recent safety information.”