Creating the Game Changer..
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ter·ror·ism : the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion..
Graphic [Terrifying] US military video showing the killing of three Iraqi people..
Who really is the TERRORist here?
Graphic US military video showing the killing of three Iraqi people is being circulated via the web after appearing on US TV news channel ABC News.
The one-minute file, filmed from a US Apache helicopter, shows three suspected Iraqi insurgents being shot with 30mm cannon fire. The clip was cut from a longer video obtained by ABC News last week and verified by a senior US army official.
The MPEG format file has been posted to several right-wing US forums, where the effectiveness of the Apache's firepower has been celebrated.
So far though, in spite of its graphic nature, the film does not seem to have attracted much attention from the anti-war movement.
Tony Sleep, a freelance photographer in the UK, was one recipient of the file. He was emailed a link to a US academic site that temporarily hosted the MPEG file.
"It's very uncomfortable to watch because it's so calculated," he told dotJournalism. "It's quite pornographic actually."
Video download (WARNING: some viewers may find this material disturbing):
http://www.journalism.co.uk/imagesn/apache.mpeg
Global Governance for a New Global Union..
By Mary Louise
http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_011303_global.html
Last week (1/6/03) we explored Dick Cheney's "Project for a New American Century", which is related to the widespread school of global thought or ideas that has permeated and infected society in general. In a speech to the Council of the Americas (COTA) on May 6, 2002 filmed by C-Span, Cheney said that everything is on schedule for completion by January 2005, of the "Free Trade Area of the Americas" (FTAA). The FTAA will become the "American Union". At this time and there will no longer be a Constitution and Bill of Rights. The old "Fast Track Legislation" has been renamed the "Trade Promotion Authority". They often change the names when people catch on to throw us off the track, in addition to disseminating conflicting, confusing, and false information through the media and other organizations. The globalists couldn't get the support they needed for the League of Nations so they just called it the United Nations instead and so it is with the New World Order, which has now become the New Global Union.
With the European Union (formerly European Economic Community) already established, one of the milestones of completing the American Union will be to oouttlaw private ownership of firearms by U.S. citizens. To prepare for the anticipated resistance and protests, the Elite have created the Office of Homeland Security to control law-abiding gun owners who are stirred up about gun confiscation, not to protect us from [fake] terrorists. They have already previously established concentration camps on military bases in almost every state, to confine resisters to the transition of the American Union. Then they will change the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), created by George H.W. Bush in 1989, to the new name "Asian Union" around 2010, which during this time the former "Soviet Union" will be resurrected under direct control of the Elite. Around 2015 or sooner, the governing body will assume full command over all four of the Global Regions, controlled by the same secret cabal. By this time, if all goes as planned by the globalists who conspire continually, national sovereignty of all nations will be a thing of the past and all people will be enslaved under the strict Global Elite.
The U.N. document entitled "Our Global Neighborhood", is a report of the "Commission on Global Governance" (CGG) published in 1995 by Oxford University Press and available through local bookstores. The CGG report says, "The development of global governance is part of the evolution of human efforts to organize life on the planet..." and was unveiled at the "U.N. World Summit for Social Development" in Denmark (March '95). This was a keystone event in the accelerating campaign agenda of the global socialists to ratify an already prepared historic pact. Then anticipating a reaction of concern by many, they attempted to ease the pain by deceptively stating in the report, "As this report makes clear, global governance is not global government. No misunderstanding should arise from the similarity of terms. We are not proposing movement toward world government." That is a conspicuous LIE and obvious chicanery! Global government is exactly what they are proposing, as they well know and anyone with eyes can see.
The "U.N. Human Development Report" in 1994, contains an essay by Nobel prize-winning Jan Tinbergen called "Global Governance for the 21st Century" where he comes right out with his true intent by saying, "Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national governments, what is needed is a 'World Government' that should have a 'World Police' and a program for the redistribution of world income." In 1992 Mikhail Gorbachev, who was appointed to head the CFR's "Global Security Project", called for "Global Government" and said it is time to consider putting, "Certain national armed forces at the disposal of the Security Council, making them subordinate to U.N. military command." The worldwide Elite oligarchy includes anyone who is or ever has been a member of the Bilderbergs, CFR, and/or Trilateral Commission, accomplishing their self-serving goals through an endlessly intertwined network of clandestine organizations, clubs, societies, associations, and institutions. They also control the UN, NATO, NSA, CIA, FBI, BATF, Pentagon, Senate and House of Representatives, our courts, and law enforcement agencies either directly or indirectly.
"Who's Who of the Elite" is designed to inform the public about the Wheelers and Dealers of our lives, to better arm themselves with the knowledge of what's happening and going wrong in the world. This book lists the members, organizations, and affiliations to reveal the stranglehold they have over our government, banks, media, industry, universities, think tanks, financial institutions, labor unions, etc. including the real facts about the true ownership of the Federal Reserve System. The Global Elite have left no stone unturned and there is precious little that has not been tampered with. These organizations go to a lot of effort and expense to remain secret, of which the Bilderbergs are the most secretive as the 'High Priests of Globalisation', though the information gets out in spite of the attempts to suppress it. The Bilderbergs decide when wars should start and end and who the players will be, they own the central banks and Federal Reserve System, they are in a position to determine money supply levels, prices of gold and other precious metals, and tightly control what countries should receive loans. They also decide who will be allowed to run for offices of President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, Governor General, or other titles of leaders.
In 1989, then-President Bush and Gorbachev shook hands on a "Unity Through Diversity" doctrine, indicating a convergence of aristocratic Black Arts Occultism with Socialist atheism. Any word ending in 'ism' is a clue that the globalists are behind it, whatever it may be. This policy doctrine is accepted because it appears to be for peace and prosperity, but later it will show itself as violent when the majority have accepted it. This new system of government and religion is falsely presenting itself as the "Great Humanitarian" and the "Master of Peace" that is actually pushing for the 'hive mentality' of collective consciousness and harmonic convergence of oneness of mind and purpose, with no room for personal opinion or individual thought process. Scientologists, satanists, atheists, and futurists are all welcome to merge into the NWO or New Global Union while Jews, Christians, Muslims, and indigenous peoples are marked for extermination. True patriots and Christians are the main targets of the media and new generation of super electronic, nuclear, and biological weapons that have been created. Colonel John Alexander and Dave Alexander openly state in their "The Warrior's Edge", "Future Warrior", and "Tomorrow's Warrior" series, that the main enemy of Globalization is American Constitutionalists and Christians, of whom E.L.F. weapons are designed to wipe out. Colonel Alexander was commander of Los Alamos and leader of the DOD's Non-Lethal Weapons Division, in charge of products that can control your mind, stop your heart, or fry you by microwave.
The "Age of Cataclysm" by Alfred Weber and Philip Less calls for a New Constitution and Federalist Manifesto with a one party system - the World Federalists, eliminating the Congress, the Constitution, and world population for a NWO and Lucifer One World Religion. It lays out the plan to set up a one world electronic mind-controlled totalitarian police state system of slavery and tracking, committing mass genocide to save nature (Gaia) and cleanse the earth of unwanted humans and animals, with the ultimate objective of offering human sacrifices to Lucifer in a high-tech occult Luciferian Age. These same people who claim they want to save nature will destroy it with HAARP, ELF, GWEN, and other WMD's. This book was promoted by the World Federalist Association and World Future Society. The Masons, Club of Rome, World Future Society (WFS), World Federalist Associations (WFA is U.S.), World Federalist Movement (WFM is International), the Global Society, and Global Policy Forum as well as many secret societies along with all intelligence agencies, who are also in alliance with Nazis hired by the CIA through Operation Paperclip, are socially engineering all societies on earth and pushing for it to happen before 2013. The Epilogue of the "Age of Cataclysm" includes a statement from"The Next Development in Man" by Lancelot Law Whyte, to create a unified-science-religion and Webre, a futurologist, goes on to deal with moving entire populations into specific areas. The Global Social Engineers insist that more than 50% of the lands must be "off limits" in order to save nature, resulting in one third of the U.S. population being moved out of rural areas while their media twists the minds of the masses to believe something other than reality. In 1989, plans were made to inter up to 21 million Americans in internment camps and truckers have been transporting snap-together 'tiger cages' to FEMA.
According to the book "The Messiah and the Second Coming", the goals of the World Federalists, The World Future Society, and the U.N. are the same as Masonry and the New Age Movement. The Psychic Agenda is the same as the World Federalist Agenda, which is the same as the U.N. Agenda, which is the same as the FEMA Agenda, and the same as the New Constitution of the U.S. Agenda. World Federalism claims to be the most effective way to organize governance while the U.N. is continuing to implement its agenda to create a world religion and global government. The major thrust is to restructure the global financial system to shift all economic power to the Bank for International Settlements, controlled by private central banks throughout the world. The Millennium Project: Global Future Studies and Research of the American Council for the U.N. University is a global participatory futures research think tank of futurists, scholars, business planners, government, corporations, universities, and policy makers who work for international and non-profit organizations. The WFM is in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the U.N. and receives financial support from dues, supporters, foundations, and government grants.
Barbara Marx Hubbard is an author, futurist, social engineer and architect, co-founder of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution, founding member of the World Future Society, and Society for the Universal Human. She co-founded the Committee for the Future in Washington, D.C., created the multi-media presentation "Theatre for the Future", and hosted a TV series called "Potentials". Hubbard also designed and co-chaired large Soviet-American Citizen Summits, including organizing the 1988 Soviet-American Citizens' Summit in Alexandria, Virginia, coordinated with the Soviet Peace Committee, a creature of the Soviet Central Committees International Department established by Stalin to carry out penetration and subversion of foreign countries. This busy activist claims to be establishing Evolutionary Circles throughout the world to support small groups, in their emergence as universal humans and founders of a global civilization.
The World Future Society is hosting an event at the Hyatt Regency in San Francisco on July 18-20 (registration by 2/28/03), called "World Future 2003: 21st Century Opportunities and Challenges". Their conferences have been described as a "global village in microcosm". Then there is the website of the Boston Chapter of the WFS - www.lucifer.com, hosted by WFS board member Alexander "Sasha" Chislenko who left Leningrad in 1989 and has founded the Institute of Memetic Engineering (unregistered). He has studied cybernetics, futurology, memetics itself, novel theories such as Ideas Futures and morphogenetic fields hypothesis, semantics in space, etc. and has compiled an extensive list of links to other futurist type organizations.
The New American articles entitled "A Plague of Power" and "Global Gorby" are very enlightening, worth reading, and the source for some of my information: http://thenewamerican.com/tna/1995/vo11no07/vo11no07_overview.htm and http://thenewamerican.com/tna/1995/vo11no22/vo11no22_gorby.htm .
The organizations and material mentioned in this article can be verified on search engines, so please check out what the global futurists are up to and how far they have progressed with their frontierish scientific, technological, political, and philosophical futuristic concepts. It will explain why so many people get that glazed look in their eyes and act strangely when informed of truthful facts. Those are the ones who have been hypnotized or are willingly going along into the Luciferian Age of deception, destruction, and bondage.
The ONLY Solution is The Plan Against The New World Order
'Power Hour' blocks Kaminski at last minute..
Greetings John,
I hope this finds you and yours well and in good spirit.
So you will know.., I was up at 5:00 this morning to hear that first hour on the "Power Hour". When you didn't come on I thought I may have written down the wrong date because there was absolutely NO MENTION OF YOU. Were you sick? Had something prevented you from being on? Nothing.
I do understand your frustration. You may or may not know of Bob Schulz's "We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education". After many years of striving to find a remedy to a problem I was having with the IRS, I met Bob who had another approach. He seemingly wanted to "strike at the root" by entering DC (after his own years of petitioning the government) and enter a "fast until death" in an effort to get government to "show him/us the law" (requiring the average state citizen to file a 1040 form). I joined Bob on that fast with the same commitment. On July 20, 2001 Bob and I obtained a "written promise" from government to meet us in a PUBLIC FORUM (per our First Amendment GUARANTEE) and "air" this issue once and for all. Long story.., government eventually reneged on it's promise.
Bob Schulz continued to chase down that "rabbit trail" (petitioning government). I realized the CON-stitution and Bill of Rights were an empty-worded fraud (once tested).
I wrote a 7 page affidavit and broke it into 3 parts. Part A: My list of grievances (which apply to most everyone - and to explain my actions). Part B: My "Declaration of Independence" (because I have a God-given right/duty to throw off evil/oppressive government) and Part C: My "Rules of Engagement" because it was/is VERY clear to me this is about ALLEGIANCE. It is war and it is to the death. My point? I WILL LIVE FREE OR DIE.., but I was/am all done with their evil "color of laws" law/ organized crime to extort me and my family.
I sent that affidavit to President Bush, then Leader Daschle, Speaker Hastert and all of my congress-critters right down to the local level. I then posted it on the internet and it found it's way to Europe. A man I had never heard of wrote me and said he had read my affidavit and if it was okay would like to point out an error. You see, in my affidavit I stated I would live under my God's Laws AND the Constitution and Bill of Rights AS INTENDED (for I was taught Christian men had framed up God's Laws inside the Constitution and Bill of Rights and I was also taught our problem was we had drifted away from these principles and all we needed to do was get back to them).
This man from Europe wrote back and said it is impossible to live under God's Laws and our constitution as every CON-stitution ever written on this planet has been a CON. He asked I read Deuteronomy 4:2. I did. Indeed, if we believe there is a God (and I KNOW there is a Supreme Ruler of this Universe) then there can only be one set of legal laws for this planet and they were given to Moses. Few paid attention to those Laws.., so The Supreme Ruler sent his Son to show us how to live The Ruler's Laws. Jesus said, "I am not come to destroy the prophets or the Law. I am not come to destroy but to Fulfill The Law." Not only have we been given the UNIVERSAL Laws to live under in word but also in Spirit.., BY EXAMPLE. Simple.
Having said all of this.., I am learning how to live "The Way".., which is SELFLESS. JAH, the man who showed me my errant thinking asked I read "THE PLAN" at www.i.am/jah/plan.htm When I entered DC, I was looking for the truth, remedy and justice. I found NONE of that in DC so I kept looking. Two pages into the "THE PLAN" I KNEW I had found what I was looking for. I'm rather certain I have gone farther than most to discover "The Truth" and for this.., I've been shown and been given what I have been searching for. Not only do I "see" what is wrong but I can now point people to what I KNOW is the ONLY remedy
(www.i am/jah/plan.htm). Funny thing.., I can't tell you how many shows I can't get on just to offer that information. It's "just words". What are they afraid of? We go past recognizing we have a problem. We go right to WHAT to DO about it.
Yesterday, I was finally (after 3 attempts) able to talk with Dave Von Kleist. During our chat we were able to tell him a good part of our story. We finished by me asking him if I could send him a copy of an audio presentation of "THE Law" (at no charge). "THE Law" is the most commonsense answer/explanation I've ever heard. It makes PERFECT sense if we are educated at all and are sincere seekers.
May I make you the same offer? All I need is your snail mail address and whether you would like it on CD or audio-cassette tape.
Long live The Fighters,
Roland
P. S. Part of what I do is make this same offer to anyone who is ready to go to that next level and suggest that if they like what they hear.., make copies and continue to spread The Word.
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 10:33 AM, John Kaminski wrote:
'Power Hour' blocks Kaminski at last minute
Host objects to author's plan to speak about Zionist media influence
By John Kaminski skylax@comcast.net
So there I was, waiting on the telephone, ready to be interviewed Wednesday morning (1/14/04) by Joyce Riley and Dave Van Kleist on their show, "The Power Hour," a radio webcast on the Genesis Communications Network.
It was to have been my third appearance on this network, having previously been a guest on shows hosted by Tom Valentine and John Stadtmiller. In addition, Stadtmiller has rebroadcast that interview. At three minutes of nine a. m., I called the number and was told by a polite voice to wait. A few minutes later, the voice came back on the line and said, "Uh, John? ... Joyce said she's going to have to reschedule you .... "
Graphic [Terrifying] US military video showing the killing of three Iraqi people..
Who really is the TERRORist here?
ter·ror·ism : the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
Graphic US military video showing the killing of three Iraqi people is being circulated via the web after appearing on US TV news channel ABC News.
The one-minute file, filmed from a US Apache helicopter, shows three suspected Iraqi insurgents being shot with 30mm cannon fire. The clip was cut from a longer video obtained by ABC News last week and verified by a senior US army official.
The MPEG format file has been posted to several right-wing US forums, where the effectiveness of the Apache's firepower has been celebrated.
So far though, in spite of its graphic nature, the film does not seem to have attracted much attention from the anti-war movement.
Tony Sleep, a freelance photographer in the UK, was one recipient of the file. He was emailed a link to a US academic site that temporarily hosted the MPEG file.
"It's very uncomfortable to watch because it's so calculated," he told dotJournalism. "It's quite pornographic actually."
Video download (WARNING: some viewers may find this material disturbing):
http://www.journalism.co.uk/imagesn/apache.mpeg
Historic 'Coverup' and 'Betrayal' in Washington..
"Does our government continue to subordinate American interests to Israeli interests?... The American people deserve to know the truth... We must finally shed some light on one of the blackest pages in American naval history. It is a duty we owe... to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States."
MID-EAST REALITIES - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 15 January 2004:
You can be the most credible and respected newsman of yesteryear warning about World War III (Walter Cronkite), or one of the most celebrated White House journalists of the recent past warning that the current occupant of the Oval Office is the worst and most dangerous President in memory (Helen Thomas), but once you're 'out of power' in today's Washington not only the government establishment but the intertwined corporate 'mass media' largely ignore you if you try to speak up in a 'politcally incorrect' manner.
Thus, as yesterday's 'Propaganda City' article helped explain, the Atlantic Monthly and the associated New America Foundation held a major conference on U. S. policies on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, yet everyone feared to even mention once the powerful Israeli/Jewish lobby's influence not just on the Congress, the White House, the State Department, and in more recent years the Pentagon and CIA... but also on the corporate mass media itself. MER's publisher discussed this matter yesterday with the conference organizer and when the affiliations of all the persons on the panel about Iraq were mentioned, he responded, "I never thought of that... that's an interesting way to think about it."
Also in Washington this week the now-Bush-controlled Department of State held a major conference about the 1967 Arab-Israeli war... a conference clearly designed to further historically whitewash the most outrageous Israeli attack ever on the U. S. military itself (hard as this may be for non-experts about the region and about [the Jewish State in] Israel's complicated relationship with the U. S. to understand).
In this case, those in power refused to give a forum to the man who once headed the U. S. military, to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer, who long ago reached the opposite conclusions to those of the historical whitewash and has felt the need for some time to come foreward in public and to directly challenge the Israelis and their many think-tanks, agents, propagandists and fellow-travelers.
The ultimate loosers are of course the American people, who continue to be propagandized about so many matters, especially those Israeli and Middle Eastern-related, not only by their government, but by so many of the major media institutions who are themselves oftentimes so timid and co-opted, so used and manipulated. Admiral Moorer didn't get on C-Span, and this article he felt compelled to write didn't appear in the Washington Post or the New York Times. But here it is from the Houston Chronicle a few days ago.
Betrayal behind Israeli attack on U. S. ship By ADM. THOMAS MOORER*
After State Department officials and historians assembled in Washington, D. C., last week to discuss the 1967 war in the Middle East, I am compelled to speak out about one of U. S. history's most shocking cover-ups.
On June 8, 1967, (the Jewish State in) Israel attacked our proud naval ship -- the USS Liberty -- killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 172. Those men were then betrayed and left to die by our own government.
U. S. military rescue aircraft were recalled, not once, but twice, through direct intervention by the Johnson administration. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara's cancellation of the Navy's attempt to rescue the Liberty, which I personally confirmed from the commanders of the aircraft carriers America and Saratoga, was the most disgraceful act I witnessed in my entire military career.
To add insult to injury, Congress, to this day, has failed to hold formal hearings on (the Jewish State in) Israel's attack on this American ship. No official investigation of (the Jewish State in) Israel's attack has ever permitted the testimony of the surviving crew members.
A 1967 investigation by the Navy, upon which all other reports are based, has now been fully discredited as a cover-up by its senior attorney. Capt. Ward Boston, in a sworn affidavit, recently revealed that the court was ordered by the White House to cover up the incident and find that (the Jewish State in) Israel's attack was "a case of mistaken identity."
Some distinguished colleagues and I formed an independent commission to investigate the attack on the USS Liberty. After an exhaustive review of previous reports, naval and other military records, including eyewitness testimony from survivors, we recently presented our findings on Capitol Hill. They include:
· Israeli reconnaissance aircraft closely studied the Liberty during an eight-hour period prior to the attack, one flying within 200 feet of the ship. Weather reports confirm the day was clear with unlimited visibility. The Liberty was a clearly marked American ship in international waters, flying an American flag and carrying large U. S. Navy hull letters and numbers on its bow.
Despite claims by Israeli intelligence that they confused the Liberty with a small Egyptian transport, the Liberty was conspicuously different from any vessel in the Egyptian navy. It was the most sophisticated intelligence ship in the world in 1967. With its massive radio antennae, including a large satellite dish, it looked like a large lobster and was one of the most easily identifiable ships afloat.
· (The Jewish State in) Israel attempted to prevent the Liberty's radio operators from sending a call for help by jamming American emergency radio channels.
· Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned lifeboats at close range that had been lowered to rescue the most seriously wounded.
As a result, our commission concluded that:
· There is compelling evidence that (the Jewish State in) Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew.
· In attacking the USS Liberty, (the Jewish State in) Israel committed acts of murder against U. S. servicemen and an act of war against the United States
· The White House knowingly covered up the facts of this attack from the American people.
· The truth continues to be concealed to the present day in what can only be termed a national disgrace.
What was (the Jewish State in) Israel's motive in launching this attack? Congress must address this question with full cooperation from the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency and the military intelligence services.
The men of the USS Liberty represented the United States. They were attacked for two hours, causing 70 percent of American casualties, and the eventual loss of our best intelligence ship.
These sailors and Marines were entitled to our best defense. We gave them no defense.
Did our government put (the Jewish State in) Israel's interests ahead of our own? If so, why? Does our government continue to subordinate American interests to Israeli interests? These are important questions that should be investigated by an independent, fully empowered commission of the American government.
The American people deserve to know the truth about this attack. We must finally shed some light on one of the blackest pages in American naval history. It is a duty we owe not only to the brave men of the USS Liberty, but to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States.
* Moorer was chairman of the joint chiefs of staff from 1970 to 1974. Houston Chronicle, 9 Jan 2004. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/editorial/outlook/2345393
Only Attorney John Ashcroft..
If the events of September 11th have proven anything..
It's that the terrorists can attack us, but they can't take away what makes us American ~
our freedom
our liberty
our civil rights..
No, only Attorney General John Ashcroft can do that..
Source..
~ Jon Stewart on The Daily Show ~
good morning HPD..the should help..for starters..
Establishment - An established social order, as: A group of people holding most of the power and influence in a government or society. Illuminati - the group of social, economic, and political leaders (up front and/or behind the scenes) who form a ruling class.
The word conspiracy, as it relates to this site, will be defined in the context of a scheme: to act in harmony toward a common end. Since the days of Rothschild and Weishaupt this conspiracy/scheme has centered upon hegemony. The people have not submitted to this power, they consent to it - though it is clearly not in their own best interest. Hegemony is a form of control in which those who have power maintain their position, not through force, but through the elaboration of a particular ideology or world view. This form of social control is long lasting, it is an effective, and patient, tactic.
The establishment, and their puppet politicians, use mysteriously vague language such as: the new world order, global governance, globalism, globalization, the new age, population control, sustainable development, consensus, synthesis, transformation - the vocabulary of doublespeak grows daily. As it has been known for centuries, "alchemists conceal in order to baffle the vulgar." This site exists for the sole purpose of penetrating the veil.
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/
This song describes "How the West (America) was Lost"..
http://www.thelawparty.org/
She came from Providence, the one in Rhode Island
where the old world shadows hang heavy in the air.
She packed her hopes and dreams like a refugee,
just as her father came across the sea.
She heard about a place people were smilin',
they spoke about the red man's way, how they loved the land.
And they came from everywhere to the Great Divide
seeking a place to stand or a place to hide.
Down in the crowded bars out for a good time,
can't wait to tell you all what it's like up there.
And they called it paradise, I don't know why.
Somebody laid the mountains low while the town got high.
Then the chilly winds blew down across the desert,
through the canyons of the coast to the Malibu
where the pretty people play hungry for power
to light their neon way and give them things to do.
Some rich man came and raped the land, nobody caught 'em,
put up a bunch of ugly boxes and, Jesus, people bought 'em.
And they called it paradise, the place to be,
they watched the hazy sun sinking in the sea.
You can leave it all behind and sail to Lahaina
just like the missionaries did so many years ago.
They even brought a neon sign 'Jesus is Coming',
brought the white man's burden down, brought the white man's reign.
Who will provide the grand design, what is yours and what is mine?
'Cause there is no more new frontier, we have got to make it here.
We satisfy our endless needs and justify our bloody deeds
in the name of destiny and in the name of God.
And you can see them there on Sunday morning
stand up and sing about what it's like up there.
They called it paradise, I don't know why.
You call some place paradise - kiss it goodbye.
Those who expect to be ignorant and free..
expect what never was and never will be..
~ Thomas Jefferson ~
sylvester..
I didn't know that the U.S., Inc. had intelligence..
that was not self serving..
a little hostory..
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
good point JB..
quare..if it is a fire one desires..
get a wood stove..
so the heat..
will not escheat..
that was quick!
Am..
Hitler and his crew knew how to manipulate the majority..
A perfect example of a country's citizens falling asleep at the wheel..
the nolib board has yet to delete my last two posts..
Reach Out And Touch Someone..
The toll free phone number for the U.S. Capitol switchboard is is: 1-800-361-5222 (90001). When you call the number, follow the prompts.
When asked for your 5 letter zip code, enter the number 90001. You will be connected to the main capitol switchboard. Just ask for the congressman or the senator you wish to speak to.
If you enter your home zip code, you will be connected directly to your Congressman or Senator.
You can call your senators for free, courtesy of this toll-free number set up by the tobacco industry. Just dial 1-800-343-3222, punch in any valid zip code, and you will be connected to your senator; call twice to reach both.
E-mail senators..
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emailsen.html
E-mail house of representatives..
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emailreps.html
E-mail CFR members of Congress..
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emailCFRcongress.html
CHENEY TARGET OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION..
Submitted by: njona "David J. Sirota, The Progress Report
January 15, 2004
While Cheney's role in a massive bribery scandal at Halliburton is under investigation in Europe, the U.S. media has neglected to report the charges.
Though neglected by major media in the United States, international news sources report that French law enforcement authorities have made Vice President Dick Cheney the target of a criminal investigation for his role in a massive bribery scandal during his time as CEO of Halliburton. Le Figaro, one of France's biggest (and most conservative) newspapers, reports "an investigative judge is looking into allegations of corruption during construction of a natural gas complex in Nigeria by Halliburton and a French oil company."...
According to a gas and oil trade publication (picked up by the international AP newswire on October 11, 2003) the judge is "looking into who may have benefited from nearly $200 million in potentially illegal commissions allegedly handed out from 1990 to 2002." In May, Halliburton admitted that, under Cheney's stewardship, it paid "$2.4 million in bribes to Nigerian officials to get favorable tax treatment." Halliburton now says it is cooperating with a simultaneous review by the Security and Exchange Commission.
The London Financial Times reports the investigation specifically focuses on the criminal charges of "misuse of corporate funds" and "corruption of foreign public agents." The Sydney Australia Morning Herald reports the investigative judge is specifically targeting Cheney for his "alleged complicity in the abuse of corporate assets."
Though the investigation is being spearheaded by French law enforcement, the UK Guardian notes, it would be prosecuted under international laws agreed to by the United States in a 35-nation treaty signed in 1997, meaning the consequences could be very real. The treaty, "under the auspices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, aims to fight corporate attempts to buy the favors of public authorities abroad." Not coincidentally, the London Financial Times points out that the Bush Administration is using similar agreements to aggressively "seek the extradition and pressing claims against senior French finance industry executives connected with the Credit Lyonnais purchase of Executive Life, the failed Californian insurer.""
http://www.friendsofliberty.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1524
The few who understand the system,
will either be so interested in its profits,
or so dependent on its favors
that there will be no opposition from that class..
The great body of people,
mentally incapable of comprehending
the tremendous advantages
will bear its burden without complaint..
By: Rothschild Brothers of London
Date: June 25, 1863
Source: In a letter discussing their new banking scheme with fellow conspirators..
Courtesy of: American Police Action Plan for Stopping World Government Rule..
The American Red Double-cross..
By
Dr. Len Horowitz
Sandpoint, Idaho-The American Red Cross (ARC) is widely considered a great American institution. It is generally thought of as among the world's premier humanitarian organizations. Clearly, almost everyone thinks of it as a life-saving agency. Most people know this non-governmental organization (NGO) to be heavily dependant upon the blood and currency generously donated by the American people. But, what if all of the above is untrue? What if everything you think you know about the American Red Cross is a ghastly nauseating lie?
My name is Dr. Leonard Horowitz. What I am about to share with you is deeply disturbing, yet potentially life-saving. The American Red Cross is not what it appears to be. . . . And I urge you to continue reading so that you learn what the ARC really represents.
Let me begin by telling you a bit about myself, and about my bias. For the past ten years I have been conducting health science and U.S. Government cover-up investigations as an independent, Harvard-trained, award-winning medical journalist and internationally recognized authority in public health.
To briefly summarize my training, in 1977 I received my doctorate in medical dentistry from Tufts University in Boston. I later received several advanced degrees... One in public health from Harvard University. I joined the faculties at Tufts University and Harvard. I directed an alternative health center for more than a decade. In the early 1980s, the Associated Press featured my work as a trendsetter. My clinic integrated dentistry with general medicine, acupuncture, chiropractic, nutrition, massage, homeopathy, and other "alternative" methods of healing.
Between 1990 and 1993 I personally trained nearly 30,000 healthcare professionals in dental and medical infection control according to OSHA standards. At that time I was the chief professional advisor for the largest dental and medical catalog supply company in the world.
In 1999, I won the prestigious "Author of the Year Award" from the World Natural Health Organization for my tenth book. This became my first bestseller. It is called Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional? Government health officials have said this book is largely responsible for America's rapidly growing anti-vaccination movement. The blood banking industry is meticulously explored here as well. For my work in exposing the global military-medical-industrial complex, I have been christened, "the King David of alternative medicine versus the omnipotent Goliath of slash, burn, and poison medicine" by consumer health advocates.
Suffice it to say, I have been extremely critical of petrochemical/pharmaceutical/blood banking industrialists for suppressing more information than they have been telling... Including potentially lifesaving information that could stem the rising epidemics of cancer, autoimmune diseases, and much, much more.. . .
In the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, unlike most Americans, I was appalled by the outpouring of support, not as much to the families of the attack victims, but to the American Red Cross as a go-between. Based on the information and documentation I published in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional?, certain individuals that control the ARC are, in fact, as much to blame for the terrorist attacks on America, and "America's New War," as Osama bin Ladin and Afghanistan's Taliban government. Before you call me crazy and junk this premise entirely, let me explain by giving you a little background on the people who run the American Red Cross. This is little preview of my American bestseller.
Background Intelligence on the American Red Cross
Founded in 1881 by American humanitarian Clara Barton, the American Red Cross (officially named The American National Red Cross) was first chartered by the U.S. Congress in 1900. A second charter, still in force, was granted in 1905. Not long after, however, John D. Rockefeller pirated the entire blood banking industry, along with the administrative leadership of the ARC. As you will soon learn, this quintessential coup de tats represented more than a glorious economic opportunity. The takeover of the ARC, and the entire blood industry, was apparently required to fulfill a far more sinister, even occult-linked, political objective-eugenics management for a racially purified planet.
To begin, during this time, John D. Rockefeller and his associates were making a concerted effort to control the entire field of medicine in America. During the 1890s, Rockefeller interests in medical education and "scientific medicine" were spearheaded by Frederick T. Gates, John D. Rockefeller's investment manager. 1901 saw the founding of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. In 1902, Rockefeller's General Education Board was founded with a mission to annihilate the causes of racial discords. This agenda was clarified two years later with the publication of John D. Rockefeller's Occasional Letter No. 1 in which he detailed his plans to mold Americans to his concept of "perfect human nature." This, he claimed, might best be accomplished by destroying parental influence, traditions and customs, while reducing national intelligence levels.
In 1904, the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (home to today's Human Genome Project) was built on the estates of John Foster and Allen Dulles, lawyers for the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company. The Dulles Brothers, who openly professed John D. Rockefeller's racial hygiene doctrines, later directed the U.S. military's Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and after World War II, the CIA. Charles B. Davenport constructed the Cold Spring Harbor facility to provide a home for racial hygiene research, what was then called "eugenics research." The first racial hygiene laws in the world evolved from investigations and reports issued from here. The John D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, America's wealthiest oil and railroad magnates, invested more than $11 million-an extraordinary fortune at that time-in funding this facility. Soon thereafter, in 1909, the first genetics laboratory was established at the Rockefeller Institute and directed by Dr. Phoebus Aaron Theodor Levene.
By 1907, medical education had been mostly monopolized by the Rockefeller consortium. That year, the American Medical Association (AMA) advanced its medical education rating system effectively eliminating, by 1918, approximately 600 of the initial 650 medical schools. Through Rockefeller cohorts in the Andrew Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching, Abraham Flexner was appointed to survey medical schools throughout America. This led to the infamous "Flexner Report" that vilified every alternative to drug-based medicine. The Rockefeller's political control over this American medical coup was clearly reflected in Flexner family relations. Abraham Flexner served on the Rockefellers General Education Board. Abraham Flexner's brother, Simon, headed the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research. Simon's brother, Bernard, later joined the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation after he helped found the politically powerful Council on Foreign Relations.
In 1910, following the death of Averell Harriman who presided over Yale's infamous secret society, the Skull and Bones, his widow donated 80 acres of estate property to establish the Eugenics Research Association at Cold Spring Harbor, New York, along with the Eugenics Records Office. The following year, social Darwinism subscriber, John Foster Dulles, revealed his desire to help develop a "super race." He explained that by eliminating "the weakest members of the population," a purer Aryan race might be created. According to several reputable authors, the Dulles brothers directing Rockefeller's management group and law firm at Sullivan and Cromwell on Wall Street, later administered the American affairs of I.G. Farben-Germany's leading industrial organization-linked intimately to Hitler and the rising Third Reich. The Dulles law firm also directed U.S. business affairs for Fritz Thyssen, Hitler's primary financial backer. Thyssen later introduced Allen Dulles to the rising Nazi fuehrer, after which brother John negotiated loans for the Nazis.
All of this activity foreshadowed, in 1928, the Rockefeller financing of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity in pre-Nazi Germany. Ernst Rudin, Hitler's chief racial hygienist, was given authority over this institute principally funded by the Rockefellers. Eugenic psychiatrist Dr. Franz J. Kallmann, and blood geneticist Otmar Verschuer assisted Dr. Rudin. Their institute was named for Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm II who was a solid supporter of early eugenics experiments and occult science to further his royal bloodline. According to Wilhelm II, World War I resulted from a conspiracy between his enemies, the blood kin Czar Nicholas II and King George V, and their affiliated secret societies.
According to historic records, Hitler was also an avid student of the occult and a member of the largely secret Thule Society that contained members of the British royal family and European banking industry. Though evidence in this area of research is understandably circumstantial, Thule Society members, with connections to other politically influential leaders in the United States, including members of the Skull and Bones Fraternity at Yale University, are believed to have founded the National Socialist Party in Germany, primarily to initiate World War II.
The Occult, Freemasonry and Rockefeller Blood Banking
In my 1999 book, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, I shed more light on these shadowy figures of eugenics history. Shortly before the war, in 1936, according to investigative journalist Anton Chaitkin, Nazi eugenicist and Rockefeller grantee, Dr. Franz Kalmann published his schizophrenia experiments after immigrating to New York because he was half-Jewish. The secret society known as the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry published his account of more than 1,000 cases. His book was used in 1939 to rationalize the "murder of mental patients and various 'defective' people," according to Chaitkin and others. At the same time, the infamous Nazi doctor Josef Mengele and Otmar Verschuer were collecting blood samples, particularly from twins, to conduct genetic experiments to further advance the eugenics field. I wrote that more horrific experiments followed:
Needles were stabbed into people's eyes for eye color experiments. Others were injected with foreign blood and infectious agents. Limbs and organs were commonly removed, occasionally without anesthetics. Women were sterilized, men were castrated, and sexes were surgically altered. Thousands were butchered and their heads, eyeballs, limbs, and organs were delivered to Mengele, Verschuer, and the other Rockefeller-linked contingent at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
It was apparently no random "coincidence" that the Rockefeller family gained so much control over the ARC and blood banking. Laurance Rockefeller assembled the New York City blood council that evolved to largely control the international blood banking industry. The importance of blood and bloodlines is a recurring theme throughout my work and history, particularly when considering the highest level and objectives of the secret Scottish Freemasons. According to the "Structure of Freemasonry," the "Order of the Red Cross" stands third in the top echelon of power just behind the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) and the "Order of the Knights Templar." Religious scholars cross their Bibles with red marker ribbons today unaware of the symbolism-the Masonic importance of the pure red bloodline.
Beginning with the Ordre de la Rose-Croix Veritas, more commonly known as the Rose-Croix, or Rosicrucians, the red (or rose) cross was adopted as an identifying symbol of the Masonic tradition. According to authors Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln in Holy Blood Holy Grail, themselves Freemasons, this practice began in 1188 when the Prieuré de Sion accepted the ceremonies of Ormus, said to have been an Egyptian sage, mystic, and "a Gnostic 'adept' in Alexandria"-a "hotbed of mystical activity" during the first century A. D. Here Ormus is believed to have exchanged theosophies with Judaic, Zoroastrian, Mithraic, Hermetic, neo-Platonic and Pythagorean scholars. The name "Ormus" was synonymous with "the principle of light" in Zoroastrian and Gnostic history. Thus, Ormus was not only the originator of the Red Cross symbol, but he apparently helped propagate the term "Illuminati."
Over time, "Illuminati" has come to mean the few powerfully illumined, or en-light-ened souls, who are said to draw their power from "Lucifer." Illuminati, in fact, according to Webster's Dictionary; is derived from the French word "Lucifer" meaning "light bearing." Webster also cross references Lucifer to the word "light."
According to Secret Societies author Jan van Helsing, "Illuminati" came into more common use during the 14th century in Germany, where it applied to the high initiates of the "Brotherhood of the Snake"-a "savant brotherhood that had subscribed to the dissemination of spiritual knowledge and the attainment of spiritual freedom from . . . extraterrestrials" more than 3,000 years before Christ.
The Latin name of "Illuminati" and the biblical term for snake have related origins and definitions. The word snake derives from "nahash," which came from the root word "nhsh" meaning to "discover," or "decipher." In Latin, "illuminare" meant "to illumine," or "to recognize," or "know."
Thus, the snake used by Rockefeller-directed organized medicine today, became a symbol of evolving illuminance or intelligence. Likewise, the Knight's Templar symbol shows the snake beginning and ending with a swastika. Citing van Helsing's research again, "One of the main branches of the Illuminati in Germany were the mystical Rosicrucians who were introduced at the beginning of the 9th century by Charlemagne."
Several other authors relayed that the Illuminati and the Rosicrucians were the driving force behind the esoteric religious movements of the 17th and 18th centuries. According to Webster's Dictionary, "Christian Rosenkreutz (NL Rosae Crucis)" was the "reputed 15th cent. founder of the movement (1624) . . . a devotee of esoteric wisdom with emphasis on psychic and spiritual enlightenment. . . ." Their manifestos, fervently supported by the liberal factions of Protestants in Europe, inflamed the leaders of the Catholic Church and the Jesuits. "Among the most eloquent and influential exponents of Rosicrucian thought was Robert Fludd"-the Prieuré de Sion's sixteenth grand master.
The Jesuit and Church backlashes that resulted in the persecution of the Cathars and Templars also helped spark Martin Luther's rebellion. "Martin Luther also had close links to both the Illuminati and the Rosicrucians," wrote van Helsing. Luther's friends recognized the Rosicrucian seal he wore that contained a rose and a cross with his initials. "After Luther's death, his confessional community was supported by Francis Bacon," the highest-ranking Rosicrucian in England, and, the general architect of the King James Bible.
Devil Doing Behind the American Red Cross
In Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional? I explained how and why, at the end of WWII, the Dulles brothers, in support of Rockefeller alliances, arranged false Red Cross identifications for Nazi war criminals, scientists, and military officials to escape through the "rat lines." A couple of years ago, the New York Times carried a story that explained that Red Cross officials were aware of the Nazi atrocities occurring in the concentration camps of WWII. They said they were remiss in reporting their evidence. They omitted, however, the intelligence that the entire Red Cross organization was directed, from high above, by the same devils that directed the business dealings between the Nazis, I.G. Farben, the CIA and the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company from the rise of the Third Reich. No wonder, the New York Times reported in another article, much of the Nazi-stolen gold suddenly emerged in Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank.
In Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola, you will also learn that the Laurence Rockefeller-directed New York City Blood Bank knowingly released thousands of pints blood contaminated with the AIDS-virus, HIV, despite holding secret the oxygenation technologies capable of clearing the virus from infected supplies. After developing AIDS, approximately ten thousand hemophiliacs died throughout the United States, along with countless others around the world. Likewise, in 1999, CNN reported that approximately 500,000 Chinese people became HIV infected similarly through contaminated blood. Not to mention the millions of others who received the hepatitis B, C and herpes (cancer) viruses through contaminated blood, likewise preventable, but purposely neglected.
In my latest book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism, and Toxic Warfare, (released June, 2001, 1-888-508-4787; $29.35) Chapter 18 is titled, "Public Health Politics, Eugenics, and Population Control." Here I detail the Rockefeller family's and their foundation's association with the population control industry. They are currently moving to eradicate half of the planet's current population, including America's civilian population as well. According to the Rockefeller-directed Population Council of the City of New York, and its affiliate the Negative Population Growth, Inc. of New Jersey, the U.S. population requires culling to 125 or 150 million people. That's about half its present number. And that, in a nutshell, is what "America's New War" on terrorism-leading to WWIII-is really about. Global population control and reduction through managed chaos. Using the standard Machiavellian practice of creating urgent problems, then costly solutions, America has been railroaded into what promises to be a long and deadly war against people previously, and likely still, on the payroll of a secret government and the CIA.
Now you might comprehend, if you have "the eyes" to read the above text, and the discernment necessary to perceive the truth it relays, why I found it nauseating that Americans so readily gave their blood and money to the Rockefeller's Red Cross. If you are among the millions who made that mistake, chalk it up to simple deception. But for heaven's sake, don't do it again! Please donate directly to the families who have been victimized. That way your contribution might do more than aiding and abetting the enemy.
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/apocalypse/red_double_cross.html
Courtesy of Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
and Tetrahedron, LLC
206 North 4th Avenue, Suite 147
Sandpoint, Idaho 83864
http://www.tetrahedron.org/
Toll free order line: 888-508-4787;
Office telephone: 208-265-2575;
FAX: 208-265-2775
E-mail: http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/mailtotetra@tetrahedron.org ***************************************************************
another great site..
http://www.pacinlaw.org/index.htm
do you want to know what IT is?
turn up the volume..
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Forms/Discovery/Deposition/WhyYouAreHere.htm
Suddenly Rush Limbaugh Is Concerned About Conspiracies..
Nationally syndicated radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh has seen the light, or maybe felt the heat. In either case, he suddenly realizes the consequences of living in a society where government agencies have unfettered access to personal information and where individuals have little or no constitutional protections. Welcome back, Rush.
For years, Limbaugh has impugned, denigrated, and chastised any caller who dared bring up the subject of federal encroachment on individual liberties, calling them "conspiracy nuts," or worse. He has had little patience for anyone who wanted to suggest that both political parties are trampling the U.S. Constitution and helping to create a gargantuan federal oligarchy at the expense of The Bill of Rights and personal freedoms. Suddenly, however, he is screaming that he is the victim of a [eeh-gads] conspiracy.
The issue at hand is a criminal investigation into whether Limbaugh, who has been addicted to pain killers for years, violated the law by "doctor shopping" in an illegal bid to obtain a continuing supply of powerful drugs such as OxyContin, Hydrocodone, and Xanax. To obtain the needed evidence, authorities seized, by court order, Limbaugh's medical records. Rush is furious! He maintains his medical records should remain private and that he is being singled out because he is a popular "conservative."
Rush's inconsistency is massive! For years, his beloved Republican Party has collaborated with liberal Democrats to eviscerate The Bill of Rights, and he has fully supported them! Patriot Acts I & II, the SS-style Department of Homeland Security and dozens of other measures have come into reality with Rush Limbaugh's complete and enthusiastic support!
As a result of Limbaugh's [and other popular "conservatives"] endorsement, personal freedoms affirmed under The Bill of Rights have all but vanquished. Virtually any American citizen, not just those targeted by a "left wing conspiracy," is capable of being victimized by this new federal monstrosity.
So, where was Rush Limbaugh when this "New World Order" [George Bush, Sr.] was being constructed? He was either ignoring it or demonizing those who opposed it.
If Rush was not concerned about people losing their 4th Amendment rights under The Patriot Act, why should people now be concerned about the loss of privacy regarding his medical records? What's good for the common goose should be good for the celebrated gander.
The fact is, no American citizen's medical records are private anymore. Neither are our financial records, our phone calls, our emails, or our travel records. The feds have absolute and total access to virtually every piece of information about every single one of us!
Furthermore, in the grand scheme of things, the loss of free speech [via phone taps, etc.] is far more egregious than Limbaugh's medical records. Historically, next to the preciousness of life, the freedom of speech has been held in the highest esteem by the laws of this country. No more!
Today, America's federal laws more resemble those of Stalin's, Hitler's, or Mao's than they do those put in place by Washington, Jefferson, and Madison. And, until now, Rush Limbaugh has not objected.
Suddenly, it's different! Now, Rush Limbaugh believes in conspiracies and is opposed to granting the federal government [or even state government, as in his case] access to personal information. It's amazing how one can change his tune when it's his own bacon in the fire!
Unfortunately, it appears that the Limbaugh saga is a microcosm of America as a whole. It seems that until the American people are personally affected by the tyrannical laws that we allow our politicians [including Republicans] to pass, we seem oblivious to their danger.
However, we should all realize that once we allow tyranny to take root, nothing short of revolution will stop it, and that what happened to Rush Limbaugh [and worse] will happen to every one of us. Therefore, how long will "conservatives" continue to support a Republican Party that facilitates such tyranny? Until they join Rush in jail, I suppose.
Copyright © 2004 Chuck Baldwin
Mr. Baldwin does a radio show called Chuck Baldwin Live Visit his web site athttp://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/. He can be reached for comment at chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com
http://www.patriotist.com/baldwin.htm
THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION..
AN INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN MIND..
BY: Stephen Ames
When you don't pay the Internal Revenue Service or
a bank, people consider you a criminal or a dead beat. You are then prosecuted
by someone who is a subordinate (Pretended U.S. Attorney paid by the IMF in
electrons) of the Alien Property Custodian (Pretended Attorney General of the
United States, INTERPOL agent, paid in electrons by IMF). I almost forgot: You
are the Alien. Read the list below:
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF.
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN.
3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921.
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
5. The Attorney General of the U.S. is not employed by the U.S. But is an Agent
of INTERPOL which is head quartered in Lyons, France.
6. The United States does not have any employees.
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF.
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789.
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes.
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been
Administrators.
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number.
11. You are an "Institutional Unit" in which your body and labor are pledged to
the UN through the IMF.
12. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System.
13. Your Social Security number is your slave number. Just about everyone in the
World has a Social Security number from the UN through the IMF.
14. The UN is a One World Super Government.
15. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony.
There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much
better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations.
16. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations.
Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the
World" and he was correct.
17. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund.
18. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of
the UN.
19. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the
property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant.
20. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court
but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
GUESS WHO AND WHAT OWNS YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ?
As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined
Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not
paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does
not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in
electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In
reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the
Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private
corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess
what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human
Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created
back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.
To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95,
18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public
Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House
Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency
Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111,
subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of
National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE
U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United
States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE
281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d
405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30,
Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General
Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand
pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but
a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE
EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are
fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire
life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do
and what not to do? Would you be lost? Did you ever think that maybe you would
find yourself? I am not afraid to acknowledge that I am an incomplete 'Being in
motion' searching for my reason for existing in this Petry dish commonly called
Earth. The evidence in my possession cannot be rebutted. Think twice before
labeling me.
One can quickly become diagnosed mentally ill for stating the facts listed
above. Most American's want people who research and discover things such as
those listed above to be locked away or murdered because, it holds a mirror up
to them and shows the evil that actually lurks in their hearts. That is exactly
what has happened to me. Don't you want my death? The people here in
Pennsylvania love death. They also want Mumia Jamal, Lisa Lambert and a host of
other innocent people murdered. When federal Judge Danzell released Lisa Lambert
on a Habeas Corpus the people here in Central Pennsylvania wanted Judge Danzell
impeached. They want Lisa Lambert dead. Judge Danzell said that Lisa Lambert's
case was the worst case that he has ever seen in the English speaking world.
Like Jim Morrison said in the film "The Doors", "Hatred is a very under
estimated emotion."
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/halluc.htm
Who's Life Is It?
The Government's, Of Course..
Steven A. Reid, M. D.
Feb 16, 1997
Gainesville Sun
To Whom it May Concern,
The fascinating article you published about the Medical Examiner's extensive authority under the Florida Statutes brings a pivotal question into crystal clear focus. In our society, does the concept of private ownership have meaning?
Take your car, for instance. You may think that you own it. You probably agree that to drive it on public roads it should have a current license tag. But did you know that under the Florida Statutes and the Gainesville Code of Municipal Ordinances even if it never leaves your private property, you must have a current tag on it? (Unless its hidden away in a shelter). If it is not properly licensed, "your" automobile can be hauled off of your property and confiscated by the government. So, who really owns your car?
Consider the tangibles tax. If you are in business you are familiar with this one. You are annually taxed on equipment and furniture that you "own" , on which you have already paid the sales tax. If you do not pay the tangibles tax for the privilege of continuing to use your own property, the government can (and will) seize your property. So, who really owns your business equipment?
Do you own your home? Unless you pay "rent" to the government in the form of recurring property taxes, your assets will be seized. Liens can and will be placed on your property. If you do not maintain your home in a manner that is pleasing to public officials, you will be accused of code violations. You can't even put up a carport or a fence without first obtaining permission from the appropriate bureaucracy. Any constructed object greater than 6 inches in height that you place on your property is considered a "structure" for which you need a permit under the building code (dog- and play-houses excluded). If you do not comply quickly enough to the commands of government administrators you will find yourself facing fines, and ultimately seizure of your property. So, who really owns your house?
Do you own your labor? The I.R.S. doesn't think so. Depending on your tax bracket, Social Security and Income tax will confiscate 40% or more of your productivity. Did you decide what percentage of your work-life would be handed over to the I.R.S., or did the government? If they can arbitrarily claim 40%, could they not just as easily claim 90%? There are several terms for the ownership of one's labor by another - "indentured servitude" and "slavery" are two that come to mind. So, who really owns your labor?
Do you think you own your body? If you, for personal reasons, wished to sell a kidney to a wealthy recipient who needed it you would be prevented from doing so by law. If you had to have a leg amputated, and you wanted to preserve it (perhaps to hang over your mantle, after all, you've been through a lot together) it would not be returned to you by the pathologist - to do so is a violation of the law. Dentists do not give children their extracted teeth for fear of violating regulations. You must wear a seatbelt when in "your" car, to protect the state's ownership interest in the continued physical well-being of "your" body. You cannot legally decide which substances you can ingest, inhale, inject or otherwise consume, only the state can make those determinations. And when a loved-one dies, the state can seize the body, sever the head, and give it to a government-affiliated researcher who claims to need it. So, who really owns your body?
Our government was created to serve us, We the People. It has grown into a greedy, arrogant monster claiming ultimate ownership of virtually everything, including us. If we don't correct it now, it will consume all we hold dear. Maybe it already has.
Steven A. Reid, M.D.
http://iresist.com/cbg/Property.html
THE LAWYER'S SECRET OATH..
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm
WHY YOU DON'T WANT AN ATTORNEY..
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Articles/WhyYouDontWantAnAtty/WhyYouDon'tWantAnAttorney.h...
The Law Enforcement Growth Industry..
by George Gordon
In trying to appraise this issue of law enforcement, much has been written and much more will be written. One point that everyone seems to agree on is that crime is out of control, and something must be done about it.
We call America the land of the free, and refer to the Soviet Union as a police state. But the facts tell us another story: they show that this country holds more people per capita in jail than any other country, including the Soviet Union and South Africa.
In reality, most people in America live in a police state, and are completely unaware of it. There is little difference between tyranny in governments, no matter where it may be. For example, the people of Poland:
have national identity cards
cannot drive without licenses
cannot work where they choose
are required to register firearms and cars
cannot build on their land without government approval
are compelled to buy insurance
must show identification papers upon demand
have a portion of their wages stolen
are incarcerated without trial or due process
have ports of entry which compel them to stop, clear and pay duties
are subject to searches on their highways
may be arbitrarily taken into custody and fingerprinted without court order
The list goes on. It makes no difference where you may be located; citizens of any country who are so constrained are not free, but living under tyranny. It matters not whether we think we have it somehow "better" than the Poles. Both systems are tyrannical in nature, the only difference being the degree of tyranny applied and the understanding of the system by the citizens. The Poles understand that they live in tyranny, while Americans have been convinced that it can't happen here, even though it has already come to pass. We recognize tyranny in foreign countries, but in our own, we refer to it as "law and order." But a police state by any other name is still a police state.
There must be a simple solution; one which will free us from this morass of crime and punishment. Any solution must conform to our Constitution (if we wish to avoid armed revolution), refrain from punishing the innocent, and punish those who are guilty. The current system does nothing but spawn an endless circle of recidivism and contempt for law in general. Our prisons, rather than being rehabilitative, are merely schools, which teach further crime.
If a victim loses their property, the criminals lose their freedom, but never make restitution to the damaged party. And the taxpayers are fleeced out of their money to fund these human warehouses. The beneficiaries of this system are not the victims -- they are the public defenders, lawyers, judges, jailers, prison guards, policemen and political administrations, and they quite literally thrive off the system.
Crime does pay, and quite handsomely. What is worse is that the victim not only loses by having his original property stolen, but by a continual drain of his resources to provide food and shelter for the thief.
Solutions to the crime problem must provide restitution for the victim, punish the criminal, decrease the prison population, eliminate over- crowding of prisons which cannot be emptied, eliminate capital punishment, and make the entire criminal justice system self-supporting by paying for itself in productive accomplishment.
How many broken homes, welfare payments, divorces, fines, jail terms and shattered lives must there be in the name of law and order, merely for the benefit of the law enforcement growth industry? How many people derive their livelihood from this industry? How many agencies are created by legislatures, city councils and Congress?
In the state of Idaho, it would probably be conservative to estimate that there are over 2,500 persons employed in this industry. That sounds like a lot, but consider the following:
There must be over 100 policemen in the city of Boise alone. There must also be 50 or more cities in the state which maintain a city police department and employ from 3 to 100+ persons.
There are 44 counties, all employing a sheriff, deputies and support personnel from 5 to 100+.
The state police employ several hundred officers and support personnel. In addition, the state employs many varied special agents. Then we must consider the administrative agencies which bring actions against citizens, such as building, electrical, health, fire, welfare and plumbing departments and the like.
There is no way to estimate the number of federal agents swarming over the state, from such agencies as OSHA, EPA, FCC, BLM, BATF, etc.
There are the jail and prison staffs, and their supporting personnel.
There is the judicial system at the county, state and federal levels, their marshalls and support personnel.
And there is the lawyer workforce.
It should be quite clear that we have no idea how many persons are employed by this industry. And each and every one of these people are looking for lawbreakers to apprehend and punish, in order to justify their employment.
It seems as though it is the purpose of government to build a system so big that everyone will either be employed by it or imprisoned by it.
This industry is nothing more than a business and customer relationship. Like any business, this industry needs more and more customers to continue to grow and prosper, in order to justify its existence and size to the people, in order to obtain more funds to further that growth. The cycle goes something like this:
"We ought to have more laws."
The executive proposes new statutes to the legislature.
The legislature passes those statutes, and creates a criminal act where there was none before (i.e., eating bananas on Sunday).
The executive branch now has more statutes to enforce, and therefore needs more employees to enforce them.
The executive appeals to the legislature for more funds, due to the increasing crime rate caused by these legislated crimes.
Funds are made available, and more employees are hired.
More employees must now justify their existence, and therefore, must find (or entrap) more "customers" into committing these so-called crimes.
"We ought to have more laws."
Etc.
In order for the sheriff, or any administrator, to justify their budget, they must itemize their expenses. Every year, we see a steady rise in crime. We also see this industry exploit their self-generated problem through the media. We constantly hear about all the crime being committed, and the answer proposed is always more laws, more police, more prosecutors, more judges, more money. We never hear how they propose to eliminate crime, prisons, jails and jailers; all we hear is that more money is needed. So we pass more laws, hire more police, and spend more money, only to learn next year that crime has risen by five percent, and we need more money to combat it.
Headlines do not exist stating, "Idaho's Prison Population Declines For Fifth Consecutive Year," or "Sheriff Submits Third Successive Budget With 5% Reduction In Requests." We have been spending more every year on the criminal justice system. And we are getting exactly what we have paid for: MORE CRIME.
As an example, let's look at a city, X. City X has one hundred policemen. The crime rate is up 5% over last year, so the media is told that the reason these one hundred policemen could not hold crime to the same level as last year is that they are understaffed and underbudgeted. Oh yes, and there were some defects in the existing statutes. So we need more money, and more laws.
City X gets five new policemen, 5% more money and another 7% to compensate for inflation (another government-created industry), and a few new laws to enforce. The product the industry sells is crime; our product line has been expanded by a few more laws, and our sales staff has increased by 5%. Our operating budget has been expanded to cover the additional overhead. Our police chief, the sales manager, now has a larger sales staff and additional responsibility, and needs a raise. Supervisors have a similar gain, and also obtain raises.
Now we must prepare for the coming year's expansion. We must justify our expanded budget, size and new products to the board of directors (the legislature). The sales staff is therefore sent into the street to ticket more violators, arrest more drunks, catch or entrap more prostitutes and drug pushers, etc. With proper management, and a little luck, we increase our business by 5%.
Now, we must make sure the media is aware of the growing crime rate. The public must be made aware that there is more crime because we are understaffed and overbudgeted, and besides, there are several loopholes in the laws that need filling. To illustrate the seriousness of the problem, the chief of police will recount some of the more horrendous crimes of the past year. Just like insurance salesmen sell insurance by using fear of death to motivate the prospective customer, the law enforcement growth industry uses fear of crime.
So another year comes and goes, and now we have 110 police, at least a 10% increase over our budget of two years ago, and a few more laws. Now our increased sales staff can get back out on the street to find and entrap more violators. This increases the population of the jail, and causes the sheriff to go to the city commissioners to request more funds to feed, house and guard the increasing load of criminals (making sure the media is made aware of his difficulties).
A proportion of the new increase in sales (arrests and jailings) bleeds over into felonies, and these criminals must be housed in the state prison. The warden, of course, must now go to the legislature and request his own budget increase, and maybe a new prison. Of course, all this business creates activity in numerous support areas; more food is needed to feed the criminals, more buildings are needed to house them, more judges are needed to handle the case loads, and more public defenders and lawyers are needed to defend the customers (citizens). The cycle is more or less complete at this point, and begins all over again.
The customer of this industry is the average citizen. It is the citizen who pays the bills; it is the citizen who is persecuted in the name of crime prevention; it is the citizen who is entrapped into committing violations of statutes by law enforcement personnel, who are simply justifying their existence by ensuring that crime exists.
The following is an actual conversation between a prisoner, "Joe," and another citizen. Joe is a bright college student, low on funds.
Citizen: What happened to cause you to be put in prison?
Joe (matter of factly): I stole $350.
Citizen: So you are guilty of the crime, and deserve to be punished?
Joe: Yes.
Citizen: Tell me exactly what happened.
Joe: Okay, I was in the B.S.U. auditorium, broke and didn't know how to make ends meet, and I saw this lady's open purse on a chair. It had money in it, so I took it. Apparently, someone saw me take it and called the police. They told the police who I was, and the police came to my apartment and arrested me. That's all there is to it. The law in Idaho is that any theft over $150 is grand larceny. I was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to indeterminate five years. That means I can spend anywhere from eighteen months to five years in prison.
Citizen: Did you plead guilty to the charge?
Joe: No, I pled not guilty. My public defender advised me to take it to trial.
Citizen: How long was the trial?
Joe: One and a half days.
Citizen: How much time have you served so far?
Joe: Eleven months.
Citizen: Did the lady get her purse and money back?
Joe: No, I spent the money to pay bills and I threw the purse away.
This conversation can be repeated in hundreds of ways, hundreds of times. This shows how a real crime happens: There was a real criminal, and a real victim. Let's see how much this crime actually cost the taxpayers to apprehend, try, convict, incarcerate and then parole back into productive society.
It costs at least $2,000 to try, defend and incarcerate Joe. He will spend an absolute minimum of eighteen months in prison. It costs $15,000 per year to feed and house Joe in the prison. Assuming Joe will be paroled for the remaining three and a half years, at $13.86 per day, his parole will cost another $27,771.50. And the lady didn't even get her $350 back -- making a grand total cost for Joe's crime of $67,271.50.
Who is paying this bill? The victim, and the rest of the community. But what about Joe? Joe plays cards, consumes food, needs clothes and shelter, and produces nothing. In addition, he provides employment for everyone involved in trying, convicting and incarcerating him. Multiply this example by hundreds, even thousands, and we can readily see how billions of dollars are wasted each year in the name of law and order. The lady who had her purse stolen would have been ahead if she had not reported the theft of her purse. The victim sentenced herself to a fine by taxation. She lost her purse and the money in it, and on top of that, was taxed to support Joe and the law enforcement growth industry for the next five years. She would have been better off if she had simply bought Joe an airplane ticket to California.
Joe is also a loser, and once again, the winner is the industry. Just how is Joe a loser? This is a story in itself.
The law in Idaho which declares $150.00 as the amount which indicates grand larceny was passed in 1949. Because of inflation, his crime should now be a misdemeanor. But he is branded a felon for life. It is his first offense. Now he is in a school which teaches crime, and he has learned from his mistakes. When he comes out of prison, he will have a degree in crime. Society will be biased against him beacuse of this mistake, and it is quite likely that he will turn to further crime to make a living. Crime pays, because most crimes are never reported, and of the few that are reported, most are not solved. Joe will be occasionally caught, and he will be a regular customer of the industry for the rest of his life. When he is caught, he will be institutionalized, and forced to live in an unnatural, zoo-like environment.
Whether we like it or not, Joe is going to be out on the street again, and everyone will be faced with another problem. At some point, we will again have to deal with Joe. For the past forty-plus years, we have been dealing with all of these Joes, and what we have been doing has not only not worked, it has failed disastrously. It is time to admit that the criminal justice system needs drastic reformation.
We know there is a problem, but what can we do about it? There is another fact to examine: Where did prisons and dungeons as a form of punishment come from? The answer is lost in antiquity. In the Bible, there are numerous accounts of individuals being imprisoned, such as Joseph, Daniel and Peter. Many nations used prisons and dungeons to punish criminals and political prisoners.
The only exception is found in the time of Moses. When the Isrealites crossed the Jordan River, they had a different kind of law: a substantive law, based upon substance and labor. The common law, and our Rights at law which our Constitution and Bill of Rights guarantee to each and every one of us, is likewise based upon substance. The connection is seen in the axiom, "If there is a remedy at law, equity may not prevail."
Our common law came from England, but its roots are at Mount Sinai. Moses brought the law down from the Mount, and it is recorded in Exodus 20. The next five chapters of Exodus contain the criminal codes. They are short and precise. There were no prisons or dungeons. The Israelites borrowed the prison system from the Romans, Egyptians and Babylonians, and we have that system in use today.
The act of punishing the victim of a crime by taxing him to house, feed and guard the criminal is adding crime upon crime, and in addition, it is unusually cruel to lock a man up like an animal.
Let's examine Joe's case again. Joe stole $350 cash, but he also threw the woman's purse away, so the victim has suffered a further loss of time to replace such things as pictures, credit cards, etc. Let's set a value upon the crime. It's a common law crime, since it involves the loss of life, liberty or property. The common law is designed to restore property and to remedy damages. Let's value Joe's crime at $50,000, which is a bit excessive, but it's a starting point for the sake of discussion. So Joe gets five years or a fine of $50,000, whichever he prefers. However, Joe is poor, which was the reason for the theft, so we are going to enforce the option of five years. Since Joe has an obligation -- let's have him work it off!
Let's put Joe in a productive capacity. Joe is not dangerous. Let's teach him the dignity of work, and of making restitution for the cost of his crime. Convict labor is not a new idea; it has been used before in many places, such as California. Joe can be placed at the Atlanta, Idaho Prison Camp to work on forest projects, such as helping fight fires, replanting trees, cutting down diseased trees and firewood. He will be paid an hourly wage -- let's say $5. If Joe works ten hours per day, six days per week, for three years, he earns his freedom -- with no parole or other strings attached. He is a free man. And the victim receives her loss in tax credits or direct payments from sales resulting from his labor.
Unions and the law enforcement growth industry will resist change, as they have done in the past. But the State is losing more with our present system. No one is hurt by setting convicts to work, and there is an unending supply of work. Numerous prisoners, when interviewed, have stated that they would welcome a chance to work off their sentences.
If the Scriptural examples cited earlier are repulsive to you, then leave God out of the equation. Ignore God, and rely only upon your own self-interest. Simple logic will tell you that it is in the best interest of everyone to change our prison system approach to crime and punishment. As a victim, which would you prefer -- restitution for the loss, or taxation to pay for the incarceration of the thief?
Some years ago, a car was stolen, and when it was recovered by the police, they issued the owner a ticket for leaving the keys in the ignition. In other words, for every crime that is committed, there may be another manufactured by the legislature. Maybe they will pass a law making it a crime to leave your house unlocked -- then when something is stolen from your house, you will be guilty for failing to secure your property. Why should the citizen even report the theft if he is going to be hassled by the police? Oh, the insurance company needs the report. In this class of "crimes," the real party of interest is the insurance company. They are the ones that want you to remove your keys from the car, and lock your house. They are the ones who stand to lose profits from your failure to perform these actions, and therefore, they want you punished when you fail to perform. Such legislation is using the police powers of the state to enforce private interests (decreasing claims and increasing profits of insurance companies).
The traffic courts provide a further example of government protecting private interests. Who cares if a person "speeds," especially if that person is in the only vehicle on the road? If we are at home and asleep, do we really care? But statistics show that "speed kills," and therefore, increasing claims at the insurance window; these cause an increase in operating costs, and therefore, a decrease in profits.
The "Law of Merchants" has crept in upon us and attempted to deny us our inalienable rights. Unfortunately, most citizens have passively, and sometimes even voluntarily, accepted this system.
Let's look at the traffic code to illustrate how we have enveloped ourselves in tyranny.
We begin at the time when there were no traffic laws, for traffic on roads, trails and highways preceded traffic codes. Whether on foot, in wagons, on horseback, carriage or stagecoach, there was traffic. In all human endeavor, there are bound to be mishaps. When our common law was in everyday use, affixing fault without any statutory law was done by litigation to determine liability and assess damages to the injured party.
With the advent of the "horseless carriage," we began to see a proliferation of traffic laws. As their number increased, the average person shifted his status, sometimes knowingly, but more often unknowingly, from "at law" to "equity" by entering into a quasi-contract through the use of the "driver's license."
Through the use of licenses and permits, the age-old rivalry of the equity courts and the common law courts took a decided turn to equity by status, and the death of the common law began. Eighty years later, we find the common law in use only in major crimes, and the grand jury, for all practical purposes, has been abolished. If our Constitution is based upon the common law, and the grand jury is a fixed right pursuant to the Bill of Rights, government cannot eliminate it, for as the Supreme Court said:
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v Arizona, 384 U.S. 436,491.
How, then, can any state abrogate the entire common law by statute? Simply by coercing everyone to waive their common law rights by getting them to volunteer into equity jurisdiction by the use of contracts. The state simply licenses everyone, inducing them to accept a privilege in place of rights.
No foreign power, by force of arms or ideology, has enslaved us. Our lack of understanding of our common law heritage, and ignorance of, or unwillingness to obey, natural law, has enslaved us to this Civil jurisdiction.
The police state imposed upon the Polish people by force in 1945 is no different than that which we Americans have imposed upon ourselves today, except in one area: We paid to have our rights subjugated to contract. The Poles, at least, saved some money.
We still have our Constitution, and we can reject limited liability, perpetual slavery and debt whenever we want to accept responsibility for our actions and debts.
The Poles cannot.
There are not many people who want to trade their slavery for the rigors of the life of a freeman. But for those few men and women who want to be free, the choice is theirs. Every person who wants to be free can free themselves, but no other person can free them.
Redress of greivances comes on the courtroom floor. Not in a political rally. Not in a union meeting. Not in a letter to the editor. The courts are open, and are manned by knowledgeable jurists who will listen to, and rule in favor of, a person's natural inalienable rights, if only they know how to claim them. And they will just as quickly slam the door on a slave, and leave him in his security. There is no security in freedom -- only boundless opportunity.
There are thousands of freemen in America, not millions. The masses prefer security, welfare, limited liability, and the satisfaction of having others control their lives. To claim your rights, you must be compelled to defend them on the courtroom floor.
Obsolete info: From the Patriot Archives ftp site at: ftp://tezcat.com/patriot. Note: This piece was written sometime in the early 80's. This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the Patriot Archives FTP site by S.P.I.R.A.L., the Society for the Protection of Individual Rights and Liberties. E-mail alex@spiral.org
http://deoxy.org/lawenfor.htm
Ayn Rand on money ~ fascinating!
From ATLAS SHRUGGED, by Ayn Rand, page 387.
NOTE: all of the bold, large text, and underline emphasis has been added by me, it is not shown in the published book.
Rearden heard Bertram Scudder, outside the group, say to a girl who made some sound of indignation, "Don't let him disturb you. You know, money is the root of all evil--and he's the typical product of money."
Rearden did not think that Francisco could have heard it, but he saw Francisco turning to them with a gravely courteous smile.
"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Aconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers [the politicians and demagogues], who claim your product by tears, or of the looters [the IRS], who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce[not STEAL]. Is this what you consider evil?
"When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears nor all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor-- your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money. Is this what you consider evil?
"Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions--and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.
"But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is MADE--before it can be looted or mooched--made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced [like the government has been doing for decades with inflation and deficit spending].
"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except by the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss--the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery--that you must offer them values, not wounds--that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of GOODS. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best your money can find. And when men live by trade--with reason, not force, as their final arbiter--it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability--and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?
"But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.
"Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants; money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?
"Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth--the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one, would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve that mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?
"Money is your means of survival. The verdict which you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?
"Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?
"Or did you say it's the LOVE of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is the loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money--and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it."
"Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.
"Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.
"But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or to keep it. Men who have no courage, pride, or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich--will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt--and of his life, as he deserves.
"Then you will see the rise of the double standard--the men who live by force [the government and the IRS and scumbag lawyers], yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money--the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law--men who use force to seize the wealth of DISARMED victims--then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters [IRS] believe it safe to rob defenseless [made ignorant of the law by sneaky lawyers and politicians who run the public education system, in this case] men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.
"Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion--when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing--when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors--when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you--when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice--you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.
"Whenever destroyers [the IRS, the Federal Reserve, and the Dept of INjustice] appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it becomes, marked: 'Account overdrawn.'
"When you have made evil [government looting through fraud, obfuscation and complication of the tax laws, and through vote for sugar-daddies who promise loot] the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world?' You are.
"You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it's crumbling around you, while your damning its life-blood--money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men's history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves--slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody's mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer. Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers--as industrialists.
"To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, a COUNTRY OF MONEY--and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man's mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being--the self-made man--the American industrialist.
"If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose--because it contains all the others--the fact that they were the people who created the phrase 'to MAKE money.' No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity--to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted, or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words 'to make money' hold the essence of human morality.
"Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters' continents. Now the looters' credo has brought you to regard your proudest [capitalist] achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter [the IRS and the federal and state governments] who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power of the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide-as, I think, he will.
"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice--there is no other--and your time is running out."
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/Money/AynRandOnMoney.htm
FEMINISM IS SOCIALISM..
Current US child support laws were actually invented in the former communist Soviet Union.
Current child support laws are communist infiltrations into the united states of America.
Feminism is a military psychological weapon used by government to control society and Amerika has become the 4th Reich.
by: Humberto Nunez
The first thing communists do to expand their power is put the women to work in order to take over the family unit. Putting them to work separates both parents from the children so that they can be indoctrinated and propagandized in the government/socialist schools and preschools. Increasing the workforce also decreases wages - Economics101 - basic simple concepts of supply and demand. Women in the workforce doubles the workforce which decreases wages, and this lowering of wages was deceptively hidden through deflation and devaluing the dollar. (example: Let's say I own a factory. I have 500 employees knocking on my door everyday looking for work; I can then decrease wages and say, "If you don't like it there's the door. I have 500 people knocking on my door everyday looking for work." On the other hand, if I cannot find enough people to work in my factory, I would have to increase wages within my ability to make a profit. Read again from top now and Continue)...
That is why in the 1950's, the average American family lived fine on one income. Today the average American family needs TWO incomes just to get by because the progressive income tax (the second plank of the Communist Manifesto, we might add) has sapped the earning power from the main male breadwinner and women in the workforce has lowered his earnings. Women in the workforce and feminism therefore are government tools for creating more Taxpaying Slaves for The State resulting in the enslavement of the average American family unit.
Feminists are being used and they don't even realize it. They have complained about power control freak men and husbands, only to have this alleged tyranny replaced by an even worst Power-Control-Freak Democratic Totalitarian Police STATE. Fabricating a so-called "social problem" such as male chauvinism or discrimination in order to justify the excuse for more government power to solve it is the oldest Dictator ploy in the book. Either Fathers own their children or the STATE OWNS the children. Law of the Jungle: women want security so they look for the best provider. When the best provider becomes the STATE (i.e. the Welfare State), she then uses the marriage license to marry (into) the STATE and now the STATE OWNS or at least controls her children (see our article entitled 5 Reasons Why Christians Should Not Get a State Marriage License, which shows that doing so amounts to polygamy because you are also marrying the state!). That's right, when you get a state marriage license, you are committing polygamy because you are marrying both the state and your spouse, and the state is the only one that can change the terms of state's prenuptial agreement called a "marriage license". (see article by Stephen Kimbol entitled "Corporate Ownership of Children")
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/FamilyIssues/Feminism/FeminismIsSocialism/FeminismIsSocialism.htm
The US Dept. of (in)Human(e) Services is the Division of Family Destruction..
Either the man/husband/father is the Head of His Household ... or the STATE is the HEAD of your Household! When the STATE is the head of your household and your family, then you become the slave and the chains that hold you in slavery are the law! (see our article by Charles Davidson entitled "Slavery")
Attack the Family Unit = weaken society ... thus more STATE CONTROL.
Cut the Head (man of the household) out = thus more STATE CONTROL = own the children thus more STATE CONTROL
Breed ignorant society (brought to you by government schools) = thus more STATE CONTROL (see the article by Joe Larson entitled "Why Schools Teach Socialism").
Feminism = weaker men
Weaker men = LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
Patriarchy = Men own their wives ... it's called a family unit ... it's called morality.
Feminism/matriarchy = everyone having sex with each others' women while still remaining "friends" like a bunch of ANIMALS!
Feminism/matriarchy = village = socialism = tribalism = lowest form of civilization = NO SURPLUS = Deficit = Slavery.
Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency = prosperity = Individual Rights = opposite of socialism = Surplus = free time for great works/inventions ...
i.e. immigrants who come here and prosper come from patriarchal family structures because
Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency.
Name me one time when Government Sponsored Propaganda was not Totalitarian in Nature. Feminism is Government Sponsored Propaganda - to weaken society; weaken the family unit; weaken it's men ... for more STATE CONTROL.
Multiculturalism = everyone different (immigrants not "Americanized") = NO UNITY amongst society = Divide & Conquer= LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
(see Frank Ellis article entitled "Multiculturalism and Marxism")
Homosexuality + abortion = population control.
(see our article by Carl F. Worden entitled "The Truth About Homosexuality")
(Population control techniques deployed at Americans) + (allowing more illegal immigrants into the country) = (higher % of society of a working slave force = Cheap slave labor.
Society today promotes, advocates, and supports homosexuality while at the same time endorses, protects, advocates, and fully supports destroying heterosexual males with alimony and child support and isolating them from their children... this is SATANIC and destroys the ability and the willingness of future generations to challenge or question authority!!!
The #1 Group to benefit from Affirmative Action are white women (thus) they are using mathematics to keep a large percentage of minority men DOWN
"He who rules mathematics rules the Universe"
This is the mathematics of racial eugenics. This is the mathematics of the New World Order. Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, Judges in the US still force thousands of men to pay child support even with the DNA evidence in front of them !!!
ABC News Article 10-02-2002 on Paternity. See also http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/paternity021002.html
Glen J. Sacks column 10-03-2002. See also http://www.glennjsacks.com/california_governor_davis.htm
Not even Saddam Hussein would force a man to pay child support for a child that is NOT his !!! Feminism is a Weapon of Mass Destruction:
"First You Get the Women, Then You've Got the Children, So Follow the Men" -Adolph Hitler
"The `perennial' father is a menace to society and must be treated as such. Like the mental defectives and those afflicted with certain hereditary diseases, he should, after due warning, be rendered incapable of further parentage." -W.J. Ruth. "Population Control For Unemployment." Birth Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 5 (May 1933), page 134.
Why aren't former Enron Execs forced to pay child support to all the families who lost their money? Why should Corporations have more rights then Individuals? The Constitution spoke of Rights of the Individual (not of the rights of Corporations).
Women today can dump their babies off in garbage dumpsters and not be prosecuted for it (a new law was passed allowing them to turn their babies over to hospital emergency rooms with no questions asked! See our article on this subject). And these women are not forced to pay child support... Women can also give up their baby to adoption (orphanages)... and not be forced to pay child support. Women can dump THEIR responsibilities... Why can't men ? Hypocrites! This is favoritism and discrimination against men.
In the Book of Genesis, when Satan attacked Adam and Eve, he attacked through the weaker vessel: the woman. Just like The STATE is doing today, attacking us through feminism, through the 'woman'. Falsely "empower" the woman for her to make the wrong choices that way to weaken the man to control him. This is how evil attacks man, who was made in the image of God.
In the Book of Exodus, Pharaoh of Egypt decided to kill all the male Israelite infants to weaken the Israelites militarily. This is nothing new. Think about it ! ! ! Statism is Antichrist plain and simple. God should be the King and Head of an individual man, and the man/husband should be the head of his household, not the Anti-Christ STATE. In this last century alone, governments around the world have killed over 500 million people of their own people. All this government sponsored propaganda about Domestic Violence is just a smoke screen to divert attention from the real abuse: Government Abuse Against It's Own People. Government is the Big Brother and Father to all...the Parens Patriae. This is the real Domestic Violence!
The Bible depicted governments as Beasts in Daniel and Revelations. Look at old Nazi films: their Armies marching like ants mimicking the Animal Kingdom and therefore subhuman. Individual Freemen become just another cog in the Wheel of the Predator Beast State which becomes the Alpha Male which today IT is doing through the propaganda of feminism. By feminizing society and thus emasculating its males for more State Control.
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.” Benjamin Franklin
"We ought to obey God rather than men." [Acts 5:27-29, Bible, NKJV]
Paying child support kills children by Funding/Subsidizing the #1 KILLER of children: single-mother-households: Children from single-mother households, compared to children of two-parent families where the biological father is present, are more likely to go to prison by 20 times, to commit suicide by 5 times, to have behavioral problems by 20 times, to become rapists by 14 times, to run away by 32 times, to abuse chemical substances by 10 times, to drop out of high school by 9 times, to be seriously abused by 33 times, to be fatally abused by 73 times, to be one tenth as likely to get A's in school, and to [per Lenore Weitzman] have a 72% lower standard of living.
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." - Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861 (1809-1865)
America used to be free. Not anymore. America has turned into Amerika, a totalitarian socialist democracy. We abandoned our Republican heritage based on individual rights long ago. Don't believe me? Read this article.
Question to America:
I (a woman) steal your child from you the father.
You take me to Court and the Judge 'gives' me custody of the child. The courts do this because they blatantly "presume" that all men are bad parents.
On top of that, the Judge now says you must keep paying the child support and education of the child without being permitted to spend time with him. If you refuse to 'pay', you are labeled/vilified into a lowlife scumbag dirt bag criminal and thrown in jail surrounded by violent criminals. And to make matters even worse, the government pays/sponsors for a massive government Nazi-like propaganda campaign, brainwashing society, convincing them that if you don't accept/pay for this, with a smile on your face no doubt, that you are than a scumbag dirt bag lowlife 'deadbeat' who belongs in jail surrounded by murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc.
(now listen to our song by Jerry Reed entitled "She Got the Goldmine, I Got the Shaft")
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS WITH SUCH BLATANT STATIST HYPOCRISY?
Question to America:
If the British had this current System some 200 yrs. ago the American Revolution would have never happened. Benjamin Franklin had like 13 bastard children, he would have ended up in jail as a 'deadbeat' dad. The rest of our Founding Fathers would have been forced to 'attend' Anger Management Courses. This US Media Propaganda Machine would have called the Protestors of the Boston Tea Party a bunch of 'nuts' and/or anarchists.
Explain to me what happened here in America, because the hypocrisy and blatant discrimination described above epitomizes what we as a society are doing to American Fathers? Why would anyone want to be a father under such circumstances? Is it any surprise that the birth and marriage rates are going down and the divorce rate is going up with that kind of blatant prejudice?
Feminism is a military psychological weapon to feminize/emasculate society for more State Control by weakening the State's Main Competitor: Men. The U.S. Federal Government is the Biggest Deadbeat Parent (see Parens Patriae): $5.7 TRILLION on the National Debt - (financial-future of 'our children'). The STATE kidnaps children from their Fathers and then demands ransom/extortion deceptively called 'child support.' Then they erect a big expensive socialist bureaucracy paid for by taxpayer slaves to administer the program bent on harassing, enslaving, and persecuting men on behalf of the mother in violation of God's law in Eph. 5:22-25. This big bloated bureaucracy justifies its own existence by promoting the false "presumption" that all men are irresponsible and bad parents. They're guilty until proven innocent, and there's no way to prove a negative, or prove that you're NOT something in law, as every good lawyer knows. Everyone who has read the bible, by the way, knows that being "presumptuous" is a sin: See Psalms 19:12-13 and Numbers 15:30.
Maxim of law: The children that belong to the mother are those of slaves and animals. But the children that belong to the Father are those of Freemen (see Bible, Gen. 21:9-14).
This maxim is why the Slave Masters used to separate the black slave Father from the black slave mother and child to weaken them to better control them. Divide & Conquer: this is nothing new.
And now they are doing it to men today in Amerika: 2002. Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, thousands of men in America are still FORCED to pay this ransom/extortion deceptively called child support even with DNA EVIDENCE PROVING he is NOT the Father:
ABC News Article 10-02-2002 on Paternity. See also http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/paternity021002.html
"Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle! Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." - Thomas Paine
Corporate Ownership of Children..
"Who owns the youth owns the future!"
~ Adolf Hitler ~
http://famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Media/Antishyster/V08N1-CorpOwnershipOfChildren.pdf
5 Reasons Why Christians Should Not Obtain a State Marriage License..
by Pastor Matt Trewhella
Every year thousands of Christians amble down to their local county courthouse and obtain a marriage license from the State in order to marry their future spouse. They do this unquestioningly. They do it because their pastor has told them to go get one, and besides, "everybody else gets one." This pamphlet attempts to answer the question - why should we not get one?
1. The definition of a "license" demands that we not obtain one to marry. Black’s Law Dictionary defines "license" as, "The permission by competent authority to do an act which without such permission, would be illegal." We need to ask ourselves- why should it be illegal to marry without the State’s permission? More importantly, why should we need the State’s permission to participate in something which God instituted (Gen. 2:18-24)? We should not need the State’s permission to marry nor should we grovel before state officials to seek it. What if you apply and the State says "no"? You must understand that the authority to license implies the power to prohibit. A license by definition "confers a right" to do something. The State cannot grant the right to marry. It is a God-given right.
2. When you marry with a marriage license, you grant the State jurisdiction over your marriage. When you marry with a marriage license, your marriage is a creature of the State. It is a corporation of the State! Therefore, they have jurisdiction over your marriage including the fruit of your marriage. What is the fruit of your marriage? Your children and every piece of property you own. There is plenty of case law in American jurisprudence which declares this to be true.
In 1993, parents were upset here in Wisconsin because a test was being administered to their children in the government schools which was very invasive of the family’s privacy. When parents complained, they were shocked by the school bureaucrats who informed them that their children were required to take the test by law and that they would have to take the test because they (the government school) had jurisdiction over their children. When parents asked the bureaucrats what gave them jurisdiction, the bureaucrats answered, "your marriage license and their birth certificates." Judicially, and in increasing fashion, practically, your state marriage license has far-reaching implications.
3. When you marry with a marriage license, you place yourself under a body of law which is immoral. By obtaining a marriage license, you place yourself under the jurisdiction of Family Court which is governed by unbiblical and immoral laws. Under these laws, you can divorce for any reason. Often, the courts side with the spouse who is in rebellion to God, and castigates the spouse who remains faithful by ordering him or her not to speak about the Bible or other matters of faith when present with the children.
As a minister, I cannot in good conscience perform a marriage which would place people under this immoral body of laws. I also cannot marry someone with a marriage license because to do so I have to act as an agent of the State! I would have to sign the marriage license, and I would have to mail it into the State. Given the State’s demand to usurp the place of God and family regarding marriage, and given it’s unbiblical, immoral laws to govern marriage, it would be an act of treason for me to do so.
4. The marriage license invades and removes God-given parental authority. When you read the Bible, you see that God intended for children to have their father’s blessing regarding whom they married. Daughters were to be given in marriage by their fathers (Dt. 22:16; Ex. 22:17; I Cor. 7:38). We have a vestige of this in our culture today in that the father takes his daughter to the front of the altar and the minister asks, "Who gives this woman to be married to this man?"
Historically, there was no requirement to obtain a marriage license in colonial America. When you read the laws of the colonies and then the states, you see only two requirements for marriage. First, you had to obtain your parents permission to marry, and second, you had to post public notice of the marriage 5-15 days before the ceremony.
Notice you had to obtain your parents permission. Back then you saw godly government displayed in that the State recognized the parents authority by demanding that the parents permission be obtained. Today, the all-encompassing ungodly State demands that their permission be obtained to marry.
By issuing marriage licenses, the State is saying, "You don’t need your parents permission, you need our permission." If parents are opposed to their child’s marrying a certain person and refuse to give their permission, the child can do an end run around the parents authority by obtaining the State’s permission, and marry anyway. This is an invasion and removal of God-given parental authority by the State.
5. When you marry with a marriage license, you are like a polygamist. From the State’s point of view, when you marry with a marriage license, you are not just marrying your spouse, but you are also marrying the State.
The most blatant declaration of this fact that I have ever found is a brochure entitled "With This Ring I Thee Wed." It is found in county courthouses across Ohio where people go to obtain their marriage licenses. It is published by the Ohio State Bar Association. The opening paragraph under the subtitle "Marriage Vows" states, "Actually, when you repeat your marriage vows you enter into a legal contract. There are three parties to that contract. 1.You; 2. Your husband or wife, as the case may be; and 3. the State of Ohio."
See, the State and the lawyers know that when you marry with a marriage license, you are not just marrying your spouse, you are marrying the State! You are like a polygamist! You are not just making a vow to your spouse, but you are making a vow to the State and your spouse. You are also giving undue jurisdiction to the State.
When Does the State Have Jurisdiction Over a Marriage?
God intended the State to have jurisdiction over a marriage for two reasons - 1). in the case of divorce, and 2). when crimes are committed i.e., adultery, bigamy. etc. Unfortunately, the State now allows divorce for any reason, and it does not prosecute for adultery.
In either case, divorce or crime, a marriage license is not necessary for the courts to determine whether a marriage existed or not. What is needed are witnesses. This is why you have a best man and a maid of honor. They should sign the marriage certificate in your family Bible, and the wedding day guest book should be kept.
Marriage was instituted by God, therefore it is a God-given right. According to Scripture, it is to be governed by the family, and the State only has jurisdiction in the cases of divorce or crime.
History of Marriage Licenses in America
George Washington was married without a marriage license. Abraham Lincoln was married without a marriage license. So, how did we come to this place in America where marriage licenses are issued?
Historically, all the states in America had laws outlawing the marriage of blacks and whites. In the mid-1800’s, certain states began allowing interracial marriages or miscegenation as long as those marrying received a license from the state. In other words they had to receive permission to do an act which without such permission would have been illegal.
Blacks Law Dictionary points to this historical fact when it defines "marriage license" as, "A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry." "Intermarry" is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as, "Miscegenation; mixed or interracial marriages."
Give the State an inch and they will take a 100 miles (or as one elderly woman once said to me "10,000 miles.") Not long after these licenses were issued, some states began requiring all people who marry to obtain a marriage license. In 1923, the Federal Government established the Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act (they later established the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act). By 1929, every state in the Union had adopted marriage license laws.
What Should We Do?
Christian couples should not be marrying with State marriage licenses, nor should ministers be marrying people with State marriage licenses. Some have said to me, "If someone is married without a marriage license, then they aren’t really married." Given the fact that states may soon legalize same-sex marriages, we need to ask ourselves, "If a man and a man marry with a State marriage license, and a man and woman marry without a State marriage license - who’s really married? Is it the two men with a marriage license, or the man and woman without a marriage license? In reality, this contention that people are not really married unless they obtain a marriage license simply reveals how Statist we are in our thinking. We need to think biblically.
You should not have to obtain a license from the State to marry someone anymore than you should have to obtain a license from the State to be a parent, which some in academic and legislative circles are currently pushing to be made law.
When I marry a couple, I always buy them a Family Bible which contains birth and death records, and a marriage certificate. We record the marriage in the Family Bible. What’s recorded in a Family Bible will stand up as legal evidence in any court of law in America. Both George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were married without a marriage license. They simply recorded their marriages in their Family Bibles. So should we.
(Pastor Trewhella has been marrying couples without marriage licenses for ten years. Many other pastors also refuse to marry couples with State marriage licenses.
This pamphlet is not comprehensive in scope. Rather, the purpose of this pamphlet is to make you think and give you a starting point to do further study of your own. If you would like an audio sermon regarding this matter, just send a gift of at least five dollars in cash to: Mercy Seat Christian Church 10240 W. National Ave. PMB #129 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53227.
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/FamilyLaw/Marriage/5ReasonsNoMarrLicense.htm
bo..
what makes one think expulsion?
when a fema look~a~like is standing by..
and then..to the grandchildren..
agreed one..
have a good night..
ouch!!
or why they do it..
unless..through the current school system..
(last 50 years..)
one is taught to be a good slave..
to obey..
and not question authority..
so..
how can one be angry?
if one is an obedient slave..
and know not..
what they do..
my sentiments exactly..
so..
where's the beef?
let them educate themselves..
and they will know more..
than what the educators are trying to teach..
in all realms..
` vex ~