17,593 hits.
17 likes
1 dislikes

17,583 hits.
18 likes
0 dislikes

Stats:

Hits
# hits over previous reading: 0
% Change over previous reading: 0.00%

Likes
# likes over previous reading: 1
% Change over previous reading: 5.88%

Dislikes
# dislikes over previous reading: 0
% Change over previous reading: 0.00%

If anyone would like me to update this more frequently, please send written hardcopy request in triplicate to my virtual reality mailbox.

17,583 hits.

I will update this number hourly.

Likes: 17
Dislikes: 0

A great man once said (fairly recently I might add):

Taken in the context you present, it would appear to be quite a deceptive statement to be presented as a "factual" bullet point on a presentation that is intended to lure prospective investors.

But then again, as long as an investor does his due diligence, he would certainly discover this fact, and wouldn't invest in the company, so no harm done.

Quoting from one of the bullet points on the recent YouTube video:

Back in my NNVC salad days, I listened to the hype and felt as if I were being indoctrinated with the philosophy of glorious returns dangled in front of me by 100% certain proponents of NNVC.

Of course, I was being lazy. If I had done my due diligence and research and taken responsibility for my own actions, I would have ignored all of those who tried to tell me that NNVC was going to experience explosive growth in the next few years (which, of course, never happened).

Now, I am ignoring the "something wonderful is about to happen" accolades that I previously fell for and am chastised for it.

Oh, the contradictions!!

I find your logic most illogical.

Now, why didn't I think of going to YouTube to find vital information regarding NNVC?

Guess I'm just lazy.

Thanks for the straight answer!

These names have been associated with NNVC for years. Damage, if any, to their reputation has no doubt already occurred with previous non-events.

How could they be harmed by additional non-events?

See, that's the problem I have...

No one can ever give a straight answer. It's always read the PR and figure it out for yourself.

Well, what if I read the PR and I infer the wrong name?

Why don't you just tell me the specific names? Why are you so afraid of mentioning their names? Are you afraid you'd be included in a lawsuit just by mentioning their names?

C'mon, just name one. Just one.

You're right Leif, I think we disagree.

My main contention is that all of the significant events are being relayed by the company itself. Not understanding the science myself, I remain skeptical of its efficacy until I see some evidence that this stuff works, from an outside source.

If the testing comes back with great results, I'll jump on board.

No, it won't be too late. If it's as good as many say, there will be plenty of chances to hop on the profit train.

Has the ocular testing of NNVC's drug candidates for the treatment of herpes keratitis started yet?

If not, why not?

Thanks. Yes. it should be interesting...

I look forward to the 1800% increase in market cap by September 2017.

I attempted to purchase shares, but none were available.

Can we get a sticky on this?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121243464


I'd love to follow the progress of the prediction.

Let's do a little math...

Today we're going to calculate NNVC's P/E ratio, from the moment of NNVC's listing on any exchange. Any point in time can be used as the P/E for NNVC is a constant.

OK, so, if I understand it, you calculate the P/E by taking the price per share and divide by earnings per share.

So, currently as I write this, the price per share is $2.77. We then divide $2.77 by earnings per share which is $0.

$2.77/$0 = Oh, dear... what was that mathematic terminology used for division by zero? 'Undefined' or some such.

How much longer will NNVC's P/E be undefined?

For those of you who purchased before the 3.5 reverse spit, share price is at $0.81.

Hope you are laughing all the way to the bank.

Let's not be hasty.

He could hold for two, three years then sell and retire a ka-jillionaire.

Use this formula and you'll make a fortune with NNVC.

((([x-N]^2-(3y x N))^4) - (6(2x - [1x])^1032))/4.11

Substitutions:

x = y + N
N = x - y
y = x - N
2x = 2(y + N)
3 = 5.2
6 = Thursday
4.11 = 4.11


You're welcome.

My algorithm has perfectly predicted today's price movements.

Based on the first half hour of trading, I could issue a ruh-roh statement. But that would be silly wouldn't it? Because the day is young and just about anything could happen, despite the infallibility of my detailed algorythmatic predictors.

My analysis of NNVC stock price and one month chart:

Based upon extrapolation from the classic bow tie pattern, heading into a split double-reverse gainer juxtapositioned upon a forward looking bi-annual lateral semi-impervious forward thrusting retro-inspective stair stepping symbiotic maneuver

and

paralleling the obverse anti-semi-spherical wax-dripping candle arrangement coupled with the top-to-bottom modal average of the quadruple helix parallaxical cross-armed formation superimposed against a plain vanilla double-endorsed infrastructional sidewinding statistical formulaic stitching impression

combined with

an abnormally normal pentagothic underhanded polka-dotted matrixing feedback with a transverse chevron motif over or under a gelatinous, amorphous and nebulous phasing coordinated three-prong diversive liberation technique utilizing a sub-foundational approach with cookie dough patterned enhancements involving parenthetical bracketed targeting consolidations using the following formula

((([x-N]^2-(3y x N))^4) - (6(2x - [1x])^1032))/4.11


I've determined there may be some price movement. But then, there may not be. It's really hard to say.

It's good to see the MMs have manipulated this stock up for once.

Thank you for this logical, well thought out post.

Sometimes you just have to reign in the runaway horse and this is one way to do it.

But what is truth? Is truth unchanging law?

We both have truths. Are mine the same as yours?

I could have some fun with this, but I've taken up enough of your time.

Have a good weekend.

replied to myself... see post 118316