Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Anadarko still selling more assets..............
March 13, 2007, 12:45AM
Anadarko says it's selling part of its K2 stake
Field in Gulf draws interest of undisclosed buyers
By DAN LONKEVICH
Bloomberg News
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. agreed to sell part of its stake in the K2 oil and natural gas field in the Gulf of Mexico to two undisclosed buyers for $1.2 billion.
The sale, which is expected to close in the second quarter, would reduce Anadarko's stake in the project to 41.8 percent from 65 percent, according to a statement Monday from The Woodlands-based company.
Anadarko plans to use new water and gas injection techniques to tap reserves from the field, said Carin Dehne Kiley, an analyst at Calyon Securities USA in New York. Poorer-than- expected results from existing processes at the field led the company to lower its estimate for 2006 reserves by the equivalent of 136 million barrels of oil, she said.
"It's nice that somebody else agrees with them that the new strategy will work," said Kiley, who rates Anadarko shares a "buy" and owns none.
Chief Executive Officer Jim Hackett is selling assets to reduce debt from the acquisitions in August of Kerr-McGee Corp. and Western Gas Resources for a combined $21 billion. The company has sold or announced the sale of more than $11 billion of oil and gas fields. Hackett has said he will sell $15 billion of assets.
Anadarko on Feb. 6 said its overall reserves rose 23 percent last year to the equivalent of 3 billion barrels of oil. Production from the six wells in the K2 field averaged the equivalent of 37,100 barrels of oil a day so far this year, Anadarko said Monday. The company will continue to operate the field.
Analysis: India's energy hunt guidelines
By KUSHAL JEENA
UPI Energy Correspondent
NEW DELHI, March 14 (UPI) -- Aimed at discouraging state-run energy companies from bidding for the same blocks, India is contemplating guidelines to have designated companies acquire overseas oil and gas assets.
Indian oil and gas companies have been competing with each other to acquire the same energy blocks overseas, leading to a rise in the price of the bloc and to India losing many assets to its Chinese counterparts. Indian companies, however, argue their bids foster healthy competition.
"Unlike China, we do not have any such policy under which designated companies are allowed to bid for a particular asset," said Jayanta Roychowdhurty, an energy analyst. "We have left the field open for all the government-controlled companies. This practice needs to be stopped through guidelines to be put in place for upstream and downstream oil and gas business."
He said India's oil sector appeared directionless, particularly on the issue of acquisition of oil and gas assets abroad, as there were gaps in the country's new oil policy, which was put in place in 1995.
"There is no policy as such to guide the upstream and downstream oil companies on buying assets in a foreign country," he said.
In 1995, India announced its policy for the acquisition of oil and gas assets overseas in order to minimize the fast-rising oil-import bills. At the time, domestic production of crude oil remained stagnant at around 33 million tons annually while demand had risen to 108 million tons.
In order to bridge the supply-demand gap, the United Progressive Alliance-led government constituted an expert committee in 2005 headed by N Krishnamurthy, a member of the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's National Advisory Council.
In a recent report to the government, the expert committee recommended the government fix slabs for investments by government-controlled oil companies that are bidding to buy overseas assets.
The committee also suggested that the government set up a mechanism to coordinate the cash-rich oil companies because each company draws its overseas strategy in line with its interests. Consequently, they frequently come across each other during the bidding process. The state-run Chinese National Oil Co. has on many occasions taken advantage of this anomaly in India's oil policy.
"The government should ask the oil companies to stick to their core business instead of asking them to diversify their field of activities," said an unidentified official of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry, which controls the government-owned oil and gas companies.
According to the ministry's data, India's dependence on oil imports is set to increase. It imports around 78 percent of its crude needs. In 2006, it imported 99.4 million tons, 6.1 percent more than the 2004-05 figure of 95.9 million tons. Imports are expected to reach 86.3 percent in the next five years.
In this scenario, the acquisition of overseas assets is badly required. In the absence of a cohesive policy, however, oil companies are fighting with each other and losing bids.
For instance, ONGC Videsh Ltd., the overseas arm of state-controlled Oil and Natural Gas Crop., decided to bid for blocks in Russia's Sakhalin-III. State-owned Oil India Ltd. has also shown interest in the same field. This in-house competition is expected to be repeated in Nigeria and Egypt where Hindustan Petroleum Corp. and OIL both have decided to bid. Similarly in Nigeria, IOC has shown interest in bidding for a refinery where the HPCL-Mittal joint venture has expressed interest.
Meanwhile, the government has vowed to achieve energy security by eliminating oil imports.
"If the economy grows by 10 percent, there will be corresponding growth in energy demand. But our energy situation does not look good," said Pranab Mukherjee, India's foreign minister, while addressing a business gathering at Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industries. "We are now importing 70 percent of our crude oil requirements at a high cost. We need to intensify our efforts to make use of nonconventional energy resources."
"Our companies should go out and acquire oil and gas assets abroad. They should also acquire mines, forests and agricultural land in Latin America," Mukherjee said.
Indian oil officials say that by 2025, with the demand for oil projected to touch 370 million tons, India should produce at least 110 million tons yearly of crude.
"Hence to maintain this level, we need to add 60 million tons of oil every year. We thought the only way to get this was to get it from outside India as equity oil. Our mission, therefore, is to get this 60 million tons every year by 2025," said Atul Chandra, a senior energy analyst and former managing director of OVL.
--
JDA signs oil drilling pact with foreign firm
• Wednesday, Mar 14, 2007
The Nigeria Sao Tome and Principe Joint Development Authority (JDA), Addax petroleum and sinopec of China have signed an agreement on the “Aban Abraham’ I deep water drill ship.
The agreement was aimed at drilling 10 wells on blocks two, three and four in the Joint Development Zone (JDZ) between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe in the Gulf of Guinea.
Jeff schrull, General Manager, Addax petroleum signed on behalf of his company while Messrs Lian Mingxiang and Ado Wanka endorsed the agreement on behalf of sinopec and JDA respectively.
The agreement was signed on Sunday in Sao Tome and the drilling which is expected to start in August next year will end in December same year at the rate of $410,000 per day.
“I am delighted that we have secured drilling capability of our project on competitive terms from Aban Abraham,” our correspondent in Sao Tome quoted schrull as saying.
According to him, Addax and its co-ventures were fortunate to find Aban Abraham drillers, given the rising cost of drilling.
“The contract will enable us to complete an extensive exploration and appraisal programme which has the potential to realise considerable value for Addax, its shareholders’ and other stakeholders in terms of crude exploitation, Schrull said.
He said that his company and their partners were committed to minimum work programme before the discovery of the first oil.
Speaking at the occasion, JDA Chairman Ado Wanka, said the initiative would go a long way to facilitate the exploration and exploitation of crude in the JDZ.
He described the event as a “huge success” which signified that stakeholders were eager to get the first oil on record time.
Commenting, Sinopec’s representative, Lian Mingxiang said the company was opportune to be part of the venture.
“We will do everything humanly possible to ensure the success of the project while bringing our varied expertise to bear on the projects”, Mingxiang said.
Addax petroleum is the operator of block four, Sinopec operates blocks two and three and JDA is the concessionaire.
Aban Abraham is a deep-water drill ship built in 1976 as a world-class second generation drill ship, which is currently being upgraded from second generation to fourth generation capability.
JDA was established in 2001 to manage hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon resources on 60\40 in favour of Nigeria in the JDZ and had since 2003 been awarded six oil blocks out of the nine blocks identified.
Addax Petroleum Added to the S&P/TSX Composite Index
Addax Petroleum Corporation (TSX: AXC) ("Addax Petroleum" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce that Standard & Poor's Canadian Index Operation is adding Addax Petroleum to the S&P / TSX Composite Index and the S&P / TSX Capped Energy Index. The addition will be effective at the open of the TSX on Monday, March 19, 2007.
Nigeria: The Asian Dance On Our Rigs
This Day (Lagos)
OPINION
March 12, 2007
Posted to the web March 13, 2007
Albertus Mekwonye
Lagos
The Nigerian oil industry, or should we say the Nigerian Government is set to see a significant shift to Asian players. The oil industry view is that western companies are now too "comfortable" taking without any benefits to the government and indeed the local communities in which they carry out their exploration activities in Nigeria.
An article in Upstream recently published referred to Dr. Edmund Daukoro, the Energy Minister as saying we are very anxious to do deal with the Koreans by the end of March . What is this deal? The article refer red to first refusal rights and preferential concessions to KNOC, The Korean National Corporation and CNOOC for a loan of about $2.5 billion in return for an investment package financed by this loan.
One of the many things that is meant to be done with this loan is for the Koreans to construct a 200 kilometre gas pipe line running from the Niger Delta to Abuja and to fund a fertilizer plant and a power station with capacity of 2250 mega watts. The assets that are being pledged, although still in the ground technically, are worth more than 5 times these loans.
Caution my friends on this type of tango! The floor may be very slippery. So I would say to the Energy Minister that there should be no anxiety in closing this deal. Caution should be the word.
A Spanish E&P company seeking to do business in Nigeria, we gather through an insider source, after protracted negotiations, was recently given some exceptional and favourable conditions. But guess what?
They want more! The typical Oliver Twist scenario. In characteristic fashion they have beefed up their projected oil exploration costs to such an astronomical figure that the Nigerian government as usual might be left with nothing or very little. This attitude seems to be the norm of most of our western players in this industry from Iran in the thirties to Nigeria in the 21st century. The national asset belongs to the exploration companies intertwined with their governments rather than the owners of the assets whose lands and people are exploited and destroyed.
Lord Browne, Chief Executive of BP plc in his keynote speech during International Petroleum Week (15th February 2006), advised that geologists should intensify their search for hydrocarbons in new areas as consumers will be dependent on supplies from just 3 areas ¨ West Africa, Russia and most importantly the 5 states around the Persian Gulf led by Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia¡±. His reasoning for this statement is most informative and in our view reflects the conservative thinking of our western friends.
The resources on which we are going to rely are close to investments by any private company. The decision on investment and production are controlled by Governments who have their own interests to pursue, which may not always be aligned with the interests or international consumers. We beg to ask the question: should Governments not pursue the interests of their nations? Why should the international consumers, interest; i.e. our western friends always take precedence? Open market and fair trade we think is what they call it only if it applies to them.
The present under current of nationalism and nationalist elements in the oil industry and the local communities in which they operate reflects this insensitivity of what has been disguised in the terminology of open market.
The Shell Bonga Development should be a good case study in contracts and concessions as the Nigerian Government is unlikely to realise any meaningful revenue if at all in most of its productive life. Thus the Government's shift to the Asian companies might give us a way of correcting some of the lopsided contracts and indeed have companies that are willing to give a little to the country. Russia has recently negotiated some of its gas concessions with BP and Venezuela and Bolivia are also demanding better conditions and a more reasonable share of the profits.
The Nigerian Government can check these excesses that have characterised our western friends in the oil exploration industry by developing a strong monitoring and control system and in formidable national oil producing company. Patriotism and nationalism should now be the central focus of any elected Government in Nigeria but with the knowledge that mutual profitability allows for sustainable growth.
The story and history of the Iranian Oil Company should be a reference as to why we need a viable indigenous industry to exploit our assets for our people ¨C in the true sense rather than paper policy.
The new talk on anti-capitalism or "vulture capitalism" is driven by the corporate insensitivities that are found in most oil companies.
A new order for sustainable and long term growth not stifled with community unrest should be examined and put in place.
There was a recent concern by the British public of the excessive profits of their banks and the super market chain Tesco and private equity fund managers that are now being watched. It is worth noting that Barclays Bank announced their astronomical annual profits the British public protested against their excessive bank charges. Barclays was quick to say that 50% - yes 50% of their profits came from overseas operations; i.e. "don't you worry we milked the foreigners more than the British public? Rip them off abroad and you are doing right does that ring a bell?
What will they say about the poor totally impoverished people of the oil producing states in Nigeria? It is alright if the profits are driving the foreign economy or the international consumers as Lord Browne of BP put it. What are we doing to ensure that our economy is driven by some of these profits.
Relevant Links
West Africa
Nigeria
Petroleum
Asia, Australia, and Africa
Trade
The oil insider who gave us the scenario of the Spanish company trying to break into Nigeria and West Africa was shocked their attitude towards investing in Nigeria is still driven by the "vulture capitalis approach. That our friends still believe that enslaving the ¡°African natives is theirs by right and yet their own communities are frowning on excessive profiteering in their domestic markets should leave us with an unquestionable sense of duty to our people.
Let us hope that we look closely at the new terms and contracts and welcome our new Asian friends with a slight reminder that the people and Government of Nigeria come first. We are not aversed to taking the consumers along with us.
- Mekwonye wrote from Bonny Island, Rivers State
Chevron sees big profits in Asia
CEO O'Reilly says the oil giant will take advantage of surging demand in China; predicts the enactment U.S. greenhouse gas laws.
By Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney.com staff writer
March 13 2007: 4:40 PM EDT
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- China's growing appetite for oil will be a challenge for U.S. consumers already facing rising gas prices, but an opportunity for Chevron, CEO David O'Reilly said Tuesday at an analyst conference in New York.
In a wide-ranging speech, O'Reilly said that U.S. greenhouse gas regulations "undoubtedly" will arise, warned about the risk of nationalization and its impact on future investments in Venezuela, while he reassured investors that Chevron is not dependent on politically risky areas like Russia or the Middle East for growing its oil reserves.
Special Reportfull coverage
Iran says it expects no oil production cuts
Oil climbs after IEA asks OPEC for more
The case for $3 gas
OPEC expected to hold line on production
Energy wrap
Wind for the home
Forget solar panels. Wind turbines in your backyard are the new thing in energy conservation, reports Business 2.0 Magazine. (more)
Green groups strut stuff
Buyers of TXU agree to scrap 8 coal plants - a sign of the growing influence of environmental groups on business. (more)
Iran:Troubled oil giant
Country struggles with falling oil production, soaring domestic use as dispute over nuclear program drags on. (more)
Oil's merger mania
With crude prices high and money still cheap, the industry could see more deals than ever. Who might be bought? (more)
Video More video
CNN's Allan Chernoff follows the trail of why gas prices are rising. (March 12)
Play video
O'Reilly said California-based Chevron (Charts), the country's second-largest oil company whose Asian operations include Australia, Thailand, and Indonesia, is well-positioned to take advantage of China's growing energy use.
Go Green. Get Rich.
Claiming that Chevron has the largest presence in the region of any competitor, O'Reilly said "we are distinctly advantaged for this reason."
"It is clear that the Asia Pacific region will be the dominant economic force 25 years from now," he said.
When asked what this meant for U.S. consumers, he said "really, this is a global market," implying rising demand in one country affects prices worldwide.
Like many major U.S. companies, O'Reilly expects new laws aimed at limiting emissions of carbon dioxide, the major greenhouse gas.
"There is undoubtedly going to be some type of greenhouse gas controls in the U.S.," he said. He added that he doesn't expect any new legislation until 2010 at the earliest.
O'Reilly also echoed other companies in saying Chevron would prefer federal oversight of greenhouse gas emissions over a patchwork of state laws.
California and several Northeastern states have moved to limit carbon emissions in response to what they see as a lack of action from the federal government.
But the prospect of carbon restrictions - which could come in either the form of a cap on emissions or an outright tax -didn't seem to bother O'Reilly.
"It's premature to say what the impacts will be," he said. "But it will clearly favor oil, gas and nuclear over the coal business."
He also said Chevron had no trouble operating in areas that already have carbon restrictions in place, like the European Union.
On the prospect of increasing the company's oil reserves - a central question when investors evaluate the viability of an oil's firm's stock - O'Reilly said Chevron's extensive operations in the Gulf of Mexico and Australia mean it will not have to boost production significantly in politically unstable places like the Middle East or Russia.
He said Chevron should be able to increase its production by over 1 million barrels of oil and gas per day by 2011 without having to rely more on troubled regions for that growth.
An addition of over 1 million barrels per day would result in average annual production growth of at least 3 percent, he said.
Several analysts have questioned the ability of Western oil companies to keep up with rising oil demand if they are locked out of the oil-rich Middle East or strong-armed into less favorable deals in places like Russia or Venezuela.
O'Reilly said Chevron's continued involvement in Venezuela will depend on the outcome of current contract renegotiations.
Chevron and ConocoPhillips (Charts) currently own 60 percent of a 190,000 barrel per day Venezuelan oil operation.
The Venezuelan government - led by its left-leaning president Hugo Chavez -controls the remaining 40 percent of the project, but is moving to take a 51 percent stake.
"How we're treated in that negotiation will very much impact our appetite going forward," O'Reilly said. Last week Reuters reported that Exxon Mobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, will hand over control of a multi-billion dollar project to the Venezuelan state by May 1.
Chevron is the world's fourth-largest publicly traded oil company by revenue, behind Exxon Mobil (Charts), Royal Dutch Shell (Charts), and BP (Charts).
Chevron made a net profit of $15 billion in 2006 on revenue of $195 billion.
Several state owned oil companies, like Saudi Arabia's Aramco, dwarf the publicly traded firms.
________________
Chevron Sees Costs for 6 Projects Rising $7.5 Billion (Update5)
By Joe Carroll
March 13 (Bloomberg) -- Chevron Corp., the second-largest U.S. oil company, expects to spend $7.5 billion more than planned on projects slated to begin in the next four years after rents for drilling rigs surged to a record.
The increase marks a 34 percent jump in costs for six projects, to $29.7 billion. Chevron threw out estimates for 11 other projects, previously tabbed at $45.9 billion, because it can't yet determine if they'll still be viable, Chief Executive Officer David O'Reilly told analysts today in New York.
Chevron, based in San Ramon, California, expects its average rig rent to jump 25 percent this year to $250,000 a day. Rates for the most prized offshore rigs have skyrocketed in the past two years as producers compete for the few units available.
``They're in a hurry to get things done,'' said James Halloran, who helps manage $35 billion, including 3.7 million Chevron shares, at National City Private Client Group in Cleveland. ``With that in mind, they're having to pay market rates. There's a credibility issue with completion of these projects.''
Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's largest oil company, last week said it sees capital spending rising to almost $21 billion this year, partly on increasing costs. Chevron in February said it plans to lift capital spending by 18 percent this year.
Drilling Plans
About 75 percent of Chevron's $19.6 billion capital budget will go to finding and developing new oil and natural-gas reserves, O'Reilly said at a meeting with analysts. The company is investing at least $1 billion in each of 30 projects to help meet a goal of increasing output by 3 percent or more annually through 2010.
The Gorgon offshore gas field in Australia, the company's most expensive project, ``is undergoing intense evaluation'' to see if the profit outlook can be improved in the face of soaring costs, O'Reilly said. Chevron has halted engineering work on Canada's Hebron field because it grew too costly, he said.
``We're not going to do projects that don't make economic sense,'' O'Reilly, 60, told analysts.
Shares of Chevron fell 99 cents, or 1.4 percent, to $67.84 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The stock has dropped 7.7 percent this year.
Chevron drilled 42 successful exploration wells last year, said Bobby Ryan, vice president for exploration. Its success rate in the past five years is 45 percent.
Projects Threatened
Chevron plans to drill exploration wells this year in the Gulf of Mexico, eastern Canada, Scandinavia, Australia, the Gulf of Thailand and off the coast of West Africa, Ryan said at the meeting with analysts.
The spending increases Chevron cited are in Canada, Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria, Kazakhstan and Angola. The 11 projects that may be put in jeopardy by increasing costs may pump the equivalent of 1.83 million barrels of oil a day, matching the entire output of Iraq, should they all go forward.
``We can see capital expenditures growing, we can see the pipeline of future projects growing, but what's not growing are future production expectations,'' Mark Flannery, an analyst at Credit Suisse Holdings USA Inc. in New York, said during a question-and-answer session with Chevron executives.
Chevron expects its 2008 budget for exploration, refineries and chemical plants to be unchanged from this year's estimated $19.6 billion, O'Reilly said. He reiterated the company's forecast for average annual output growth of 3 percent or more.
Outlook in Venezuela
O'Reilly said decisions on whether to invest in new oil and gas projects in Venezuela will hinge on how the company fares in ongoing talks to surrender part of its stake in the Hamaca oil project to state-controlled Petroleos de Venezuela SA.
``Our appetite will depend very much on how we are treated in the current process,'' O'Reilly said today.
A gas-injection project at Kazakhstan's Tengiz, the third- largest oil field outside the Middle East, will help more than triple the field's output to 1 million barrels of crude a day by 2012, said George Kirkland, executive vice president for exploration and production. Chevron has a 50 percent stake in Tengiz.
Production from the $2.8 billion offshore Frade field in Brazil won't begin until 2009, a year later than planned previously, Chevron said. The Bibiyana gas project in Bangladesh will start production by the end of June after missing a 2006 start-up target, the company said.
Chevron is expanding its capacity to process low-cost, high-sulfur crudes with projects in such places as South Korea, the U.K. and California, Mike Wirth, the company's refining chief, said at the analyst meeting.
To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Carroll in Houston at jcarroll8@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: March 13, 2007 16:16 EDT
Aban Abraham refurbishment complete mid 2007 - Once commissioned, the Aban Abraham will undertake drilling operations for a third party operator before starting drilling
operations for Addax Petroleum........ hmmmmmm
ND9
Oil cos to invest $74 mln in Sao Tome/Nigeria zone
Monday March 12, 8:15 PM
SAO TOME, March 12 (Reuters) - China's Sinopec Corp and
Canada's Addax Petroleum Corp will spend $73.8 million on prospecting in two blocks of a Joint Development Zone of Sao Tome and Nigeria, a spokesman said.
Jeff Schrull, a spokesman for the exploration venture, was speaking in Sao Tome at the weekend at a ceremony to sign a contract with with Indian deepwater specialist services group Aban Offshore Limited .
Addax said last week it had agreed with Aban to start drilling operations as early as the second quarter of 2008.
Aban said separately the contract was worth $123 million.
Sinopec heads a consortium that paid a $71 million signature bonus last March for a production sharing agreement for block 2 in the Joint Development Zone. Addax holds a stake in block 4.
The Joint Development Zone was created under a deal to end a long-running dispute between Nigeria, Africa's most populous country and top oil producer, and the tiny Atlantic archipelago of Sao Tome and Principe, which currently produces no oil.
Nigeria owns a 60 percent stake in the zone with 40 percent belonging to Sao Tome, most of whose 170,000 people live on less than $1 a day and hope crude oil could drag them out poverty.
U.S. major Chevron Corp. raised hopes last May when it announced it had found oil and gas in block of the Joint Development Zone, but it is still too early to say whether the reserves are commercially viable.
Under the treaty governing the zone, even if viable reserves are found, Nigeria and Sao Tome only start to benefit after the firms involved have recouped their research costs, which could run into billions of dollars.
The new Seven Sisters
Financial Times FT.comSearch FT.comSunday Mar 11 2007
By Carola Hoyos
The new Seven Sisters The old ’Seven Sisters’ were the western companies that once dominated the world’s energy industries. The FT’s new seven are mainly state-owned companies from the emerging world.
When an angry Enrico Mattei coined the phrase “the seven sisters” to describe the Anglo-Saxon companies that controlled the Middle East’s oil after the second world war, the founder of Italy’s modern energy industry could not have imagined the profound shift in power that would occur barely half a century later.
As oil prices have trebled over the past four years, a new group of oil and gas companies has risen to prominence. They have consolidated their power as aggressive resource holders and seekers and pushed the world’s biggest listed energy groups, which emerged out of the original seven sisters – ExxonMobil and Chevron of the US and Europe’s BP and Royal Dutch Shell – on to the sidelines and into an existential crisis.
The “new seven sisters”, or the most influential energy companies from countries outside the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, have been identified by the Financial Times in consultation with numerous industry executives. They are Saudi Aramco, Russia’s Gazprom, CNPC of China, NIOC of Iran, Venezuela’s PDVSA, Brazil’s Petrobras and Petronas of Malaysia.
Overwhelmingly state-owned, they control almost one-third of the world’s oil and gas production and more than one-third of its total oil and gas reserves. In contrast, the old seven sisters – which shrank to four in the industry consolidation of the 1990s – produce about 10 per cent of the world’s oil and gas and hold just 3 per cent of reserves. Even so, their integrated status – which means they sell not only oil and gas, but also gasoline, diesel and petrochemicals – push their revenues notably higher than those of the newcomers.
Robin West, chairman of PFC Energy, an industry consultancy, says: “The reason the original seven sisters were so important was that they were the rule makers; they controlled the industry and the markets. Now, these new seven sisters are the rule makers and the international oil companies are the rule takers.”
The International Energy Agency, the developed world’s sectoral watchdog, calculates that 90 per cent of new supplies will come from developing countries in the next 40 years. That marks a big shift from the past 30 years, when 40 per cent of new production came from industrialised nations, most of it controlled by listed western energy groups, noted a report published last week by Rice University’s James A. Baker III Institute of Public Policy.
The biggest contributor will be Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest and most sophisticated national oil company and thus number one on the FT list. After the surge in crude prices since 2002, Saudi Aramco launched its most ambitious expansion programme in a generation. It aims to boost production capacity from 11m barrels a day – or 13 per cent of today’s global consumption – to 12.5m b/d and then 15m b/d.
In doing so, Saudi Aramco will consolidate its position as the world’s most powerful oil company, allowing Riyadh to remain the world’s central banker of oil – turning taps on when there is a shortage of global supply, and off when prices are falling below its comfort level.
International oil companies and the leaders of the main consuming nations have come to accept Saudi Aramco’s dominance. But the recent shift in the international influence of smaller national oil companies has been harder to swallow. By the end of last year, companies such as BP and Shell had lost their leading positions on the world’s stock exchanges: Russia’s Gazprom and PetroChina (88 per cent owned by CNPC) had pushed their way into second and third place among the biggest listed energy groups.
ExxonMobil, perhaps the only energy company from the developed world that can match the new batch in overall influence, now remains alone at the top. Gazprom, Petrobras of Brazil and PetroChina have also outshone the others in share price gains.
The main reason for this shift in power has been a resurfacing of the resource nationalism that began in Mexico in the 1930s, spread to the Middle East in the 1970s and abated – and in some cases went into reverse – when oil prices cooled in the late 1980s and 1990s. Groups including Mattei’s Eni are having to accept new contract terms in countries such as Russia and Venezuela, where national energy companies are systematically clawing back control of fields.
Venezuela this month enacted a law that will give PDVSA majority control of the Orinoco belt’s heavy oil fields, the largest such resource in the world. In Russia the Kremlin wrested control of Shell’s $20bn (£10bn, €15bn) natural gas project on Sakhalin Island at the end of last year and announced Gazprom would lead the development of the vast Arctic Shtokman gas field, relegating international oil companies to service providers.
This month Lord Browne, BP’s chief executive, travelled to Moscow to try to head off becoming the latest Gazprom victim. He proposed that BP marketed the Russian company’s future liquefied natural gas abroad in an effort to stave off Gazprom’s ambitions to take control of the Kovykta gas field, one of BP’s key Russian assets.
The impact of today’s nationalism is different from that of the 1970s. In 1975 Gulf, one of the original seven sisters and now part of Chevron and BP, shifted all its movable investment dollars out of the developing world and back to North America and the North Sea. This time international oil companies are finding no new fields to escape to. In fact, they have discovered nowhere capable of pumping more than 1m b/d since 2000, when Kazakhstan’s Kashagan field became the biggest find in 30 years.
Meanwhile, national oil companies are banding together to help to develop each other’s reserves, leaving growth in the oil and gas industry – and the resources for world economic development – in the hands of the new seven sisters and the governments that control them. The consequences of this could hardly be more profound. Fatih Birol, chief economist at the IEA, estimates that the world is falling 20 per cent short of making the $20,000bn investment needed to ensure adequate energy supplies for the next 25 years.
Governments’ unwillingness to allow their national oil companies to reinvest their recent windfall profits back into the industry lies at the root of many of the worries about future supplies. Instead, those governments use the money for social ventures or it is wasted.
President Hugo Chávez, of Venezuela, spends two-thirds of PDVSA’s budget on his populist social programmes, with almost $7bn being funnelled in that direction by 2005, compared with the $77m spent in 1997 by the previous government, the Rice Univeristy report found. Meanwhile, in Russia too little of Gazprom’s earnings goes towards upgrading Russia’s antiquated, leaking pipeline system, 30 per cent of which needs replacing, the IEA warns. In Iran, NIOC is still a gas importer despite controlling South Pars, the world’s biggest gas field. It is hindered from boosting its oil production or fixing its refineries because of the burden of financing subsidies that keep petrol prices at just 10 US cents a litre.
But the poster child of what happens when a government restricts foreign investment while using its national oil company as a bottomless piggybank is Mexico. Pemex’s decline has excluded it from the FT list of the developing world’s most influential energy companies.
The most pessimistic forecasters say the rapid ageing of Mexico’s giant Cantarell field will turn America’s third largest oil supplier into a net importer within a decade.
“The x-factor is [Mexico’s] Congress, with Pemex constantly locked in a battle to secure sufficient funding and a reasonable fiscal regime, the company cannot plan on a long-term horizon with great certainty, handicapping its ability to manage declines,” says Ryan Todd, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein, the US financial group. This would contribute to a “severe problem” in world oil supplies within the next three to five years. For Mexico, it would mean the gradual loss of 40 per cent of its tax revenue.
International oil companies are, however, competing not only with resource holders but also with national oil companies that have turned resource seekers – highlighting the issue of energy security.
Jimmy Carter, who as US president during the oil shocks of the late 1970s passed the most sweeping energy legislation in the country’s history, says in an interview that energy insecurity is “still a major issue and will be increasingly a crisis situation in the years to come”. The present situation differs from the one he tackled in one main respect: “Today we are experiencing on a global basis competition from China and India that I didn’t know when I was president.”
The biggest of those competitors is CNPC. It has a solid foothold in China’s large reserves, owning 88 per cent of PetroChina. But it is its rapid push to secure international reserves that makes it so powerful.
Backed by Beijing’s feverish quest to secure the energy it needs for China to develop, CNPC has fanned out across the globe into about 20 countries from Azerbaijan to Ecuador. It has pumped more than $8bn into the oil industry of war-torn Sudan, when concerns over human rights deter others in the industry from involvement with Khartoum. “CNPC are the rule makers on access to new reserves in new markets and they are changing the competition for resources, services, capital and markets,” says Mr West.
Nor is CNPC the only company changing the rules in the race to secure assets. Smaller national oil companies such as Petrobras and Petronas are also keeping international energy executives awake at night.
Petrobras, for example, has been at the forefront of the technology needed to pull oil out of ultra-deep waters, such as those that abut Brazil’s shores. The company is now using those skills to compete head-on with the likes of BP and ExxonMobil in Angola as well as the US Gulf of Mexico.
Malaysia’s Petronas has also spread out internationally, notably into Sudan and Burma. It receives about 30 per cent of its corporate revenues from abroad and operates in more than 26 countries, producing oil from about 50 projects, more than half of which it runs, Rice University’s report notes.
Companies such as Petrobras and Petronas have the advantage that they can more easily woo fellow resource-rich national oil companies. International oil companies continue to suffer from their 1980s and 1990s reputation as haughty and patronising business partners.
Malcolm Brinded, head of Shell’s exploration and production, acknowledges this when he says international oil companies need to ask themselves, “How are we going to make this marriage work?” He describes Shell and other international oil companies as “much less paternalistic than in the partnerships of 20 years ago”.
Examples of this include anything from the tone the international groups use in negotiations, to employing and training local engineers and building infrastructure, such as desalination plants, even though it might not be needed for the project in which the company is involved.
International oil executives are making these concessions because they believe today’s power balance is unlikely to change any time soon. Christophe de Margerie, chief executive of Total and the man who made his mark brokering deals with national oil companies in the Middle East and Africa, says: “I think this new world will stay even if the price of oil drops a little bit. People will keep in their soul that they have this power – it will take time before they change.”
But he adds that his optimistic side believes that eventually national oil companies, many of them battling declining fields and other technical and managerial challenges, “might be forced to consider, ‘well, whatever we said, those people are worth working with because we need them to develop our reserves’.”
The wish expressed by Mr de Margerie could not be further from the self-assured position his predecessor at CFP, Total’s ancestor, used to enjoy 60 years ago. Yet it is a worry not only for Mr de Margerie and his peers. If the new seven sisters do not live up to their potential, the world’s continued economic growth, China’s development and the west’s comfort and wealth will become far from assured.
SAUDIS HEAD A RICH FIELD
With 25 per cent of the world’s oil reserves and the capacity to produce nearly triple the amount of any other group, Saudi Aramco is the world’s most successful national oil company. The House of Saud dictates energy policy but leaves day-to-day strategy to the capable technocrats who run it. Saudi Aramco is investing $50bn (£26bn, €38bn) over 15-20 years but its biggest fields are ageing.
Gazprom No other company keeps Europe, and increasingly Asia, on tenterhooks more than Gazprom. As a tool of the Kremlin, it has been involved in a gas dispute with Ukraine and a debate with Japan and China over competing pipelines from Siberia as well as the grab of Royal Dutch Shell’s majority stake in the Sakhalin II liquefied natural gas project.
Gazprom has increased its influence with upstream deals in central Asia, including Iran. Downstream, its push into the European market has set off moves to limit its access.
CNPC/PetroChina All three of China’s top oil companies have been making ambitious moves abroad. But China National Petroleum Corporation, with its 88 per cent owned PetroChina as a listed subsidiary, is the biggest and has the widest international reach.PetroChina holds most of its overseas assets in a joint venture with its parent and is active in about 20 countries from Azerbaijan to Ecuador. CNPC retains sole control of its controversial assets in Sudan.
NIOC Iran is one of the few Middle East countries with massive hydrocarbon wealth that is open to investment by foreign energy companies. National Iranian Oil Company has partnerships with Italian, French, Dutch and Norwegian companies and collaborates with Chinese and Russian groups.
Yet South Pars, the world’s biggest gas field, remains so untapped that Iran is a net gas importer.
PdvsaPresident Hugo Chávez this year signed a law that allows Pdvsa to seize control of the $30bn Orinoco Belt heavy crude oil projects. Pdvsa’s production is shrinking but it is still important to the fortunes of international energy groups, many of whose contracts are being rewritten.
PetrobrasThe strength of Petrobras is in finding and producing oil from deep waters. Expertise gained in Brazil’s waters is being applied in offshore west Africa and the Gulf of Mexico, where its Cottonwood field is in production.
Petronas Malaysia’s national oil company has been described as the role model others would like to follow. Though a top-three exporter of LNG, Petronas risks falling behind the oil groups of Qatar, Nigeria and Indonesia.
Halliburton opening office in United Arab Emirates
Halliburton opening Dubai headquarters
Oilfield services company plans United Arab Emirates office to expand mideast business.
March 11 2007: 7:04 PM EDT
MANAMA, (Reuters) -- Halliburton Co., the U.S. oilfield service giant, said Sunday its chief executive plans to open a corporate headquarters in the United Arab Emirates in an effort to expand business in the Eastern Hemisphere.
"My office will be in Dubai, and I will run our entire worldwide operations from that office," Halliburton chief executive David Lesar said at an energy conference in Bahrain. "Dubai is a great business centre."
The company said it will maintain its global headquarters in Houston, where the company is currently based.
An analyst said the move made sense. "The company as a whole has continued to diversify internationally, and the Middle East is a point that they have targeted," said William Sanchez, a U.S.-based analyst at Howard Weil Inc. "They are being opportunistic in putting the CEO in the middle of the action."
During 2006, more than 38 percent of Halliburton's $13 billion in oil services revenue was generated in the Eastern Hemisphere.
Sanchez said he believed Halliburton's move to Dubai is not tax related. Instead he views it as a strategic play.
Lesar said Halliburton is considering listing its shares on one of the Middle East bourses as it looks at growth potential in the hemisphere.
"One of the things that we would like to pursue ... is a listing of our shares in the Middle East," Lesar said on the sidelines of the event. Halliburton has not yet decided in which country it would list its shares.
"At this point in time we clearly see there are greater opportunities in the Eastern Hemisphere than the Western Hemisphere," he told reporters.
Growth
Halliburton would spend a large part of its $1.4 billion investment budget for the year in the Middle East, he said.
Oil and gas service companies have hiked prices for their services over the past two years as the sector strains to bring enough capacity on line to meet rapidly rising demand.
Many new supply projects are in the oil-producing countries of the Middle East, while Asia accounts for most of the rising demand.
In contrast, a slide in natural gas prices in the United States has prompted investor concern that oil and gas companies might cut back on spending in North America.
Halliburton has long been involved in the Middle East energy sector.
KBR Inc., the engineering and military-services contractor unit that Halliburton is in the process of splitting off, is the Pentagon's largest contractor in Iraq. The company has faced several investigations into alleged overbilling there, as well as for its links to Iran, where U.S. companies are forbidden from operating.
Vice President Cheney was head of the company from 1995-2000.
Lesar also said he expected the price of oil to stay above $40 a barrel, providing good conditions for future investment in the oil and gas industry.
Oil giant that runs on grease of politics
Nigeria is rich but almost none of it flows to the people
Gail Bensinger, Chronicle Foreign Editor
Sunday, March 11, 2007
(03-11) 04:00 PDT Abuja, Nigeria -- This may be Africa's most populous nation, playing a prominent role in regional politics and lining up with the West in the war on terrorism. But that is not what American business and government leaders mean when they refer to Nigeria as an "indispensable partner."
What they're talking about is one word: oil.
More than 1 of every 10 barrels of oil consumed in the United States each year comes from Nigeria, the only OPEC member in sub-Saharan Africa. A handful of giant multinational oil companies, including San Ramon's Chevron, are in partnership with the government to exploit the enormous reserves in the Niger Delta and, increasingly, offshore.
"There is oil in this country," Bala Mohammad, an aide to the governor of northern Kano state, told a group of visiting American journalists earlier this year, "but it doesn't come to us; it comes to you."
The huge haul of easy oil money has led to corruption and impunity on an astonishing scale. Nigeria gets a large proportion of its income from oil and gas, meaning that its annual budget is far more dependent on world oil prices than on national productivity. Politicians are assured of an income stream no matter how badly they disappoint their constituents, so they have little incentive to invest in the infrastructure that could ease everyday life and encourage development.
Petroleum riches have not helped lift the vast majority of Nigerians out of abject poverty. A country with reserves of 36 billion barrels of oil and 184 trillion cubic feet of natural gas cannot deliver electricity to its people. Factories cannot operate without reliable power, so industries are idle and unemployment is rampant. As irrigation schemes have faltered and farmland turns irreversibly into desert, Nigeria has morphed from a food exporter to a food importer. Other resources that could contribute to development languish, including coal, gold and industrial metals.
Crude oil is sent abroad for refining, then re-imported to supply gas stations where long lines of drivers wait under the baking sun. Travelers along the main north-south highway risk getting shaken down, or worse, at the impromptu roadblocks that spring up after dark. Everybody, rich and poor, buys water, and anyone who can afford it has a generator. In most cities, sewers are open ditches running alongside the streets. Garbage remains uncollected. Typhoid, malaria, HIV/AIDS and other preventable diseases are rampant.
Oil distorts the federal system of government in many ways. It interferes with a genuine census, for example, because oil revenues are distributed by a formula based on population so states try to pump up their figures to get a bigger piece of the pie. Industry practices -- notably burning natural gas, a process called flaring -- have befouled the air, water and land. In oil-producing regions, bunkering -- organized theft of crude by the tanker-ful -- is an illicit trade in which, the locals say, the military engages. Kidnapping for profit is on the upswing, helped along by the payment of ransoms.
Would Nigeria have been better off without oil? Outside of the government and the oil industry, a lot of people think so.
Patrick Utomi, director of the Centre of Applied Economics at Pan African University in Lagos, describes the state of the economy as "two steps forward, four steps back." He is a candidate for president from one of the numerous minor parties, running on a platform that calls for diversifying the economy. As things now stand, he said, "The economic players are taking off profits and not creating wealth."
M. T. Seigha, an activist from the delta region, says the Nigerians who live in the industry's shadows are left to endure its downside -- environmental degradation and lack of opportunity for work in the industry. "Our thinking is that Shell, Mobil and everybody should pack up their bags please and go back where they came from," he said, "because we are not benefiting from it."
Not everyone has suffered deprivation, of course. Holding national office has enriched politicians and the "Big Men" who back them. The country has endured numerous military dictatorships, including some led by officers who have re-entered politics as civilians. If -- and this is a big if -- the national elections take place as scheduled next month, it will represent the first hand-over of power from one elected president to another in the 47 years since Nigeria won its independence from the British in 1960.
There is a delicate political balance between the Christian south and the Muslim north. President Olusegun Obasanjo is a southerner and a former coup leader. He tried to have the constitution changed so he could seek a third term, and many politics-watchers say he's planning to remain the behind-the-throne power by hand-picking the candidate of his People's Democratic Party, Umaru Yar'Adua, who fell ill last week and remained in a German hospital.
Meanwhile, officials in the administration throw up obstacles to registering voters and preparing polling sites.
"These elections have been designed to fail," said Jibrin Ibrahim, a former political science professor who now heads the Centre for Democracy and Development, a nongovernmental political research organization.
"We've had enough of this president," Ibrahim added. "The issue before us now: Has he got the message?"
Obasanjo's successor was supposed to be Vice President Atiku Abubakar, a northerner. But the two men fell out and Atiku, as he is universally known, bolted to another faction, the Action Congress.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission recently cited Atiku as one of more than 130 national and state politicians unfit for office. Atiku denies the numerous allegations that he has enriched himself while in office, including his link with the mysterious frozen money found last year in the refrigerator of U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-La..
Atiku deftly sidestepped questions from the American journalists about his financial dealings, complaining that the president is "trying to fire me and I don't want to be fired."
Obasanjo considers establishment of the commission as one of his proudest achievements. He bragged with no apparent sense of irony that Transparency International, which rates countries on good or bad governance, has bumped Nigeria up a few notches from dead-last on his watch. "There are not many countries in the world that have achieved what we have done" to fight corruption, Obasanjo told us.
The 4-year-old commission is headed by Nuhu Ribadu, a boyish-looking crime-fighter with the intensity of a true believer. While he has been criticized for going too easy on Obasanjo and the ruling party, Ribadu has racked up an impressive list of fraud convictions, including some office-holders, and has succeeded in convincing the National Assembly to enact laws cracking down on money laundering.
Among his proudest achievements, Ribadu said, was virtually shutting down Nigeria's most notorious cottage industry -- the e-mail spam that dangles a huge payoff, providing the unwitting mark puts up a small amount to facilitate the deal. The commission's crackdowns have recovered $750 million that has been returned to victims all over the world, he noted.
While inboxes remain full of those too-good-to-be-true appeals, most of them now originate in other African countries or Eastern Europe, Ribadu said. But he ruefully conceded that it was easier to get rid of the scammers than the bad association that continues to link "Nigeria" with "scam."
Ribadu said he has received numerous death threats. "This is the most dangerous work in the world today -- it's more dangerous than walking the streets of Baghdad."
In the sun-bleached courtyard of the ornate palace, a dozen tall men in boldly patterned red-and-green robes and red turbans mill about, alert for the first sound of the siren.
Finally a police car, lights flashing, speeds through the archway and slams to a halt. Behind it, a black Rolls Royce eases to a stop. The waiting men gather by the car's rear door, holding out their arms to create a protective curtain as it opens. One holds an ornate umbrella large enough to shade a San Francisco patio as a white-shod foot emerges.
Then the men in red and green fall in line behind the passenger, chanting about what he is doing as he enters his desert-baroque palace.
The emir has arrived.
The emir is the traditional ruler of Kano, in Nigeria's Muslim north. The ceremonial trappings of his office, and his quiet advice to the politicians who run Kano state, provide a link to pre-colonial times before cell phones and air conditioning and traffic jams and Internet cafes. Before oil.
Not far away, an open plaza the size of Union Square is stippled with dozens of debris-filled concrete holes, each about a yard across. These dye pits are an open-air reminder that Nigeria used to have a successful textile industry, raising cotton and producing finished cloth for domestic use and export.
Once, every pit was in use, and ownership passed from father to son. Today, a solitary man wielding a stick slowly submerges a pair of pants into a hole filled with dark-blue dye, then slowly pulls it out, repeating the motion in a timeless rhythm. Hawkers crowd the few visitors, offering traditional tie-dyed indigo fabrics that once found ready markets at home and abroad.
If the emir is a link to Nigeria's past, the empty dye pits reflect the reality of the present. Some hand-weaving still exists in Kano and elsewhere, but the entire industry has fallen behind its African neighbors, unable to compete regionally in mass production of cotton textiles or in international markets where synthetic fabrics dominate the cheap-cloth market.
If laundry is one way to measure the state of an impoverished community, then the residents of the Jungle, the locals' name for the enormous Lagos slum of Ajegunle, are about as poor as they come. In the mile upon mile of tiny houses lining unpaved streets, there is almost no drying laundry to be seen. Many people don't have clothes to spare.
There is a vivid sense of vitality here. Residents treat the streets as open-air living rooms. Children surround visitors with cameras, and cheer loudly when someone takes their photos. The sound of Fela's Afrobeat blasts from boom boxes. But there is no running water, no electricity, no sewers, no garbage removal. Five, 10, even 20 people can live in a room that is maybe 10 feet square. The occasional dwelling bears a sign reading "THIS HOUSE IS NOT FOR SALE" -- evidence of another kind of Nigerian scam, selling houses you don't own.
When the rains come, the ditches that collect sewage overflow and the dirt streets turn to thick, viscous mud. Some years bring flooding, but residents say they stay put because there is no place to go.
Oil riches have not brought the people of the Jungle many things. Safety. Privacy. Opportunities. Peace and quiet. A government safety net.
There are some small signs Nigeria is getting to a better place, though at a pace that is unlikely to bring change soon enough for the people of Ajegunle.
Next month's election is one such signal, although the three main candidates -- Yar'Adua, Atiku and Muhammadu Buhari, another ex-military dictator running on the ticket of the All Nigerian Peoples Party -- are seen as flawed. All are from the north, in accordance with an agreed-upon transfer of power from the Christian south of Obasanjo to a leader from the Muslim north.
Festus Okoye, a human-rights lawyer in the northern city of Karbala, says much depends on whether the elections are peaceful, and whether the results appear legitimate to voters.
If the new government tackles the problems of poverty and the economy improves, people will be more comfortable with democracy, he predicted. "You cannot have democracy without democrats."
Chronicle Foreign Editor Gail Bensinger recently traveled to Nigeria on an editors fellowship from the International Reporting Project at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. E-mail her at gbensinger@sfchronicle.com.
This article appeared on page E - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Chevron could partner with China oil producers
By Joe Carroll Bloomberg News
Published: September 14, 2006
Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil company after ExxonMobil, is in talks to join with Chinese petroleum producers on exploration and production projects one year after beating out Cnooc, a Chinese oil company, to acquire Unocal.
The company is in discussions with Cnooc, PetroChina and China Petroleum & Chemical, known as Sinopec, "to explore partnership opportunities both inside and outside of China," said Steve Del Regno, managing director of Chevron's liquefied natural gas trading business in Asia. The talks could lead to joint development of oil and gas deposits, he said.
Chevron, which opened an office in Beijing earlier this year, seeks to capitalize on growing petroleum demand in the world's most populous nation. Cnooc is already a partner with Chevron and Woodside Petroleum in a gas export project off the coast of Western Australia that made its first shipment of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, to China in June.
"Cnooc and Sinopec are looking for U.S. partners so they can gain access to oil for China," said Mark Kajita, a fund manager at Baker Boyer Bancorp.
The chief executive officer of Chevron, David O'Reilly, has expanded in Asia to tap oil and gas reserves close to booming markets in China and India. The San Ramon, California-based company bought a $300 million stake in Reliance Petroleum of India in April that is expected to help finance a new refinery in Gujarat and open the door to exploration deals with Reliance's parent.
"Chevron views China as an important market for LNG in the future, and we want to remain engaged with potential customers and trading partners here," Del Regno said Tuesday at the U.S.-China Oil & Gas Industry Forum in Hangzhou, China. "We value this relationship and hope it continues to grow."
Sinopec, the largest Asian maker of gasoline, diesel and other fuels refined from crude oil, could also be interested in gaining access to Chevron's network of filling stations to increase Sinopec's share of the global retail fuels market, Kajita, of Baker Boyer, said.
Cnooc abandoned an $18.5 billion cash bid for Unocal in August 2005, after concluding that U.S. lawmakers would scuttle any deal on the grounds of national security.
Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil company after ExxonMobil, is in talks to join with Chinese petroleum producers on exploration and production projects one year after beating out Cnooc, a Chinese oil company, to acquire Unocal.
The company is in discussions with Cnooc, PetroChina and China Petroleum & Chemical, known as Sinopec, "to explore partnership opportunities both inside and outside of China," said Steve Del Regno, managing director of Chevron's liquefied natural gas trading business in Asia. The talks could lead to joint development of oil and gas deposits, he said.
Chevron, which opened an office in Beijing earlier this year, seeks to capitalize on growing petroleum demand in the world's most populous nation. Cnooc is already a partner with Chevron and Woodside Petroleum in a gas export project off the coast of Western Australia that made its first shipment of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, to China in June.
"Cnooc and Sinopec are looking for U.S. partners so they can gain access to oil for China," said Mark Kajita, a fund manager at Baker Boyer Bancorp.
The chief executive officer of Chevron, David O'Reilly, has expanded in Asia to tap oil and gas reserves close to booming markets in China and India. The San Ramon, California-based company bought a $300 million stake in Reliance Petroleum of India in April that is expected to help finance a new refinery in Gujarat and open the door to exploration deals with Reliance's parent.
"Chevron views China as an important market for LNG in the future, and we want to remain engaged with potential customers and trading partners here," Del Regno said Tuesday at the U.S.-China Oil & Gas Industry Forum in Hangzhou, China. "We value this relationship and hope it continues to grow."
Sinopec, the largest Asian maker of gasoline, diesel and other fuels refined from crude oil, could also be interested in gaining access to Chevron's network of filling stations to increase Sinopec's share of the global retail fuels market, Kajita, of Baker Boyer, said.
Cnooc abandoned an $18.5 billion cash bid for Unocal in August 2005, after concluding that U.S. lawmakers would scuttle any deal on the grounds of national security.
Aban Offshore owns 97% in Sinvest
India Infoline News Service / Mumbai Feb 19, 2007 16:26
This has happened post the mandatory offer for the Norwegian firm. The offer ended on Feb 16. Aban International Norway received acceptance for about 28.8mn shares of Sinvest
Aban Offshore Ltd. announced on Monday that it now owns about 97% equity stake in Sinvest ASA after the mandatory open offer for the Norwegian company ended on Feb 16.
Aban International Norway AS received acceptance for about 28.8mn shares of Sinvest under the mandatory offer. Together with existing ownership of 6.07mn Sinvest shares, Aban International Norway holds approximately 34.9mn Sinvest shares, representing about 57% of the equity share capital of the target firm.
Aban Offshore, through its subsidiary, Aban Singapore Pte Ltd and Aban International Norway holds approximately 59.15mn shares of Sinvest, representing about 97% of the share capital of the Oslo Stock Exchange listed company.
Prior to the mandatory offer, 50.01% of the share capital of Sinvest was held by Aban International Norway and Aban Singapore.
The outlay for the mandatory offer was estimated at approximately US$800mn. The mandatory offer commenced on January 9. The transaction was based on an equity value of about US$1.32bn and an enterprise value of about US$1.8bn.
Sinvest is a large jack-up drilling company owning three new-built premium jack-up drilling rigs and having 5 jack-up drilling rigs at various stages of construction in Singapore shipyards. Two of the new-built jack-up rigs have been deployed with Hardy Oil and Shell Brunei while the third rig has secured a deployment with Shell Malaysia.
Sinvest also owns a 50% stake in Venture Drilling AS, a Norwegian company that has taken a drill ship on long term bareboat charter. This drill ship is set to be deployed with Exxon Mobil in West Africa. Sinvest also holds the entire equity of Beta Drilling AS, another Norwegian company that has taken on bareboat a jack-up drilling rig, which is undergoing a shipyard upgrade for being ready for suitable deployment opportunities.
With the completion of the mandatory offer, Aban Offshore will now be placed in the league of the Top 10 offshore drilling service providers in the world in terms of offshore drilling assets under management.
OT: Conoco, Chevron (& XOM) agree May 1 handover in Venezuela
Reuters
CARACAS
Petroleumworld.com 03 09 07
Venezuela said on Thursday U.S. oil giants ConocoPhillips and Chevron Corp. have agreed to cede by May 1 operations of multibillion-dollar projects in the Orinoco heavy crude belt.
In compliance with a decree issued last month by President Hugo Chavez, the companies will form transition committees to oversee the handover of their projects' operations to state oil company PDVSA.
Exxon Mobil Corp. has already agreed to pass control of its operations to PDVSA by the tight May Day deadline.
Chavez, who is pressing a raft of nationalizations since a December landslide re-election, wants the state to take at least 60 percent of the projects that develop tarry crude in the OPEC nation.
Although he set the May deadline for PDVSA to take the operational helm, he is allowing the foreign investors until almost September to finalize the terms of their stakeholding in the projects.
PDVSA director Eulogio del Pino said in a company statement the committees were being formed "so that the nationalization of these businesses should be finalized by May 1 and that the operations should be transferred from the foreign firms to the Venezuelan state."
The four Orinoco projects, valued at more than $30 billion, turn tar-like oil into around 600,000 barrels per day of lighter synthetic crude.
For years, Chavez, who declares himself an enemy of capitalism, has squeezed foreign oil investments with nationalization moves and taken over some assets in other industries.
But the major oil companies' Orinoco investments are the largest he has taken on since coming to power in 1999. The pace of the takeovers and the absence of open opposition from the companies have surprised political and economic analysts.
There has been no word on whether the Sincor heavy crude project, involving France's Total and Norway's Statoil ASA , will transfer to PDVSA control in the Orinoco.
But Total's chief executive said this week his company regards the Orinoco as a priority and promised to work "shoulder to shoulder" with Venezuela over its investments in the country.
Del Pino also said Conoco agreed to set up a transition body for the May 1 handover of operations in a natural gas field, Corocoro, which is covered by last month's decree too.
Reuters 08 03 07
Copyright© 2007 Reuters. All Rights Reserved.
Walldog, I doubt SEO is doing all of this on his own. I've read a bunch of articles from different Nigerian publications that state he's a front man for the President, VP, and or other high ranking Nigerian officials......... So it's easy to maneuver when you're backed by the President in a country that wheels and deals.
Let's hope SEO can continue to maneuver after the upcoming Presidential election.
Yes, I'm loooong and strong on ERHC Energy.
ND9
Addax 3/7/07 Capital Markets charts posted............
http://www.addaxpetroleum.com/_media/Investor_Presentation_2007-03-07.pdf
Exxon Plans to Lift Output a Million Barrels a Day
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This Print Reprints Share
DiggFacebookNewsvinePermalink
By JAD MOUAWAD
Published: March 8, 2007
Exxon Mobil, the world’s biggest publicly traded oil company, which earned a record $39.5 billion last year, explained yesterday how it was going to spend all that cash.
The chairman and chief executive, Rex W. Tillerson, said that Exxon planned to increase investments in oil and natural gas projects to more than $20 billion a year in the next three years, as it faces higher costs. Exxon’s capital expenses have increased more than 30 percent since 2002.
Exxon expects to add one million barrels a day of oil and gas to its current production as the company starts more than 20 projects in the next three years, Mr. Tillerson said at an analyst meeting yesterday in New York. These include liquefied natural gas projects in Qatar, deepwater fields in Angola and the Gulf of Mexico, and oil fields in the North Sea.
The company, whose emphasis on capital discipline is unrivaled in the industry, said that much of the increase in capital spending was for new projects and not to make up for inflated costs. The company also plans to keep spending billions to buy back shares and pay large dividends to its shareholders.
Thanks to high oil prices, which averaged more than $65 a barrel in New York last year, oil companies have had record earnings — none more than Exxon, which last year, for the second consecutive year, reported the largest profit of any American corporation.
At home, the high profits have dismayed some lawmakers and led the Democratic-controlled Congress to seek higher taxes from oil companies. Abroad, Exxon is facing tough negotiations with Venezuela, which is seeking to gain more control over its energy sector.
Like much of the rest of the industry, Exxon is facing sharply higher costs because of increased energy prices and more activity in the oil and gas sector. The cost of everything involved in finding and pumping oil — from equipment and drilling rates, to manpower, steel, construction material and engineering fees — has increased more than 50 percent since 2004, according to Cambridge Energy Research Associates, an energy consultancy.
Exxon, based in Irving, Tex., has been known for its attention to cost control and financial efficiency. That message was repeated by Exxon’s managers on Wednesday, who stressed that budget discipline was the reason for the company’s financial and operational performance. Exxon produces 2.7 million barrels of oil and 9.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas a day.
“Exxon is not immune to market cost increases,” Stuart R. McGill, a senior vice president for exploration and development projects, said during the analyst meeting. But, he added, the company had made up much of these increases through asset sales and internal cost reduction.
“We’re a company with a well-deserved reputation for discipline and consistency,” Mr. McGill said.
In 2006, Exxon’s spending on exploration and development projects was $19.9 billion, 12 percent more than in 2005. The company expects that figure to average more than $20 billion from 2008 to 2011.
Over the last five years, Exxon has bought back $58 billion worth of its shares, including $25 billion last year. It has also paid $34 billion in dividends since 2002.
“We will continue to be the industry leader,” Mr. Tillerson said during the presentation to dozens of analysts, which started promptly at 9 a.m. and lasted exactly three hours. “Relative to the competition, we’re confident we’re going to continue to operate above the industry.”
The only downside to the company’s outlook, analysts said, was that Exxon seemed to have abandoned a production growth target of 3 percent. Even then, executives cited delays at several projects operated by rivals — like the Kashagan oil field of Eni or the Thunder Horse drilling platform of BP — in which Exxon is a minority partner.
“Among the major oil companies, Exxon is the most disciplined in the way it invests, in the way it screens projects, and in the way it executes these projects,” said James L. Smith, a finance professor at Southern Methodist University’s business school, who has been a consultant for energy companies, including Exxon. “There is an Exxon way to approach every business prospect.”
Next Article in Business (10 of 28) »
Exxon Mobil Plans 20-Plus New Projects
By JOHN PORRETTO Wednesday, March 07, 2007
HOUSTON - Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. said Wednesday it will spend some of its record profits on more than 20 new global projects in the next three years, investments expected to add 1 million oil-equivalent barrels a day to the company's volumes at peak production.
Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, also said its project inventory at the end of 2006 has the potential to develop 24 billion oil-equivalent barrels. The company produced about 4.2 million barrels of oil equivalent a day in 2006.
Chairman and CEO Rex Tillerson said Exxon Mobil's capital spending would be about $20 billion a year through the end of the decade. The company's capital spending tab in 2006 was nearly $20 billion, up $2.2 billion from 2005.
"While opportunities and actual spending in any given year will likely vary depending on the pace and progress of individual projects, suffice it to say we expect very active levels of investment beyond the end of the decade," Tillerson told analysts during a presentation at the New York Stock Exchange.
Tillerson said the company, which produces about 3 percent of the world's oil, will continue to pursue projects in mature markets such as North America, Australia and the North Sea as well as growth regions such as the Middle East, Russia and West Africa.
In South America, Tillerson said the company had decided to turn over operational control of a joint venture project in Venezuela's oil-rich Orinoco River region to its partner, Petroleos de Venezuela SA, Venezuela's government-controlled oil company. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez ordered by decree last week the takeover of oil projects run by foreign oil companies in the Orinoco region. He promised to occupy the fields in the region and fly the national flag over them by May 1.
But Tillerson said discussions continue over the ownership stake of its Venezuelan operations and other aspects of the arrangements. BP PLC, Chevron Corp., ConocoPhillips, France's Total SA and Norway's Statoil ASA also have projects in the country.
"There's a lot that has to be discussed with the Venezuelans yet," he said. "It'll be some time, I suspect, before we come to any conclusion on our continuing participation in the joint venture or our exit from the joint venture on terms that everybody is satisfied with."
Industry analysts and company executives question whether Petroleos de Venezuela has the money and capacity to take on the pricey, complex projects, which upgrade heavy tar-like crude into lighter, more marketable oils.
During the three-hour session on Wall Street, Tillerson pointed out the company's return on investment, noting Exxon Mobil led the industry in 2006 with return on capital employed of 32 percent, 50 percent higher than its competitors.
He also cited the company's aggressive stock repurchase efforts, saying annual share buybacks increased to $25 billion in 2006 from $4 billion in 2002, reducing the average number of shares outstanding by 12 percent during that period.
In a research note, Citigroup analyst Doug Leggate said as long as oil remains above $50 a barrel _ it was trading around $61 a barrel Wednesday _ Exxon Mobil likely can continue buying back shares to the tune of about $28 billion annually, adding 5 percent to underlying earnings per share.
Last month, Exxon Mobil posted the largest annual profit by a U.S. company _ $39.5 billion _ although its earnings for the last quarter of 2006 declined 4 percent to $10.25 billion.
The record annual earnings followed a year of extraordinarily high energy prices as crude oil topped $78 a barrel in the summer _ driving up average gasoline prices in the United States to more than $3 a gallon. Prices retreated later in the year.
The fourth-quarter decline reflected lower profits from Exxon's refining and marketing operations and a sharp drop-off in natural gas prices.
Exxon Mobil's full-year 2006 revenue was $377.6 billion. Wall Street analysts polled by Thomson Financial currently forecast those sales to grow to $387 billion in 2007.
Exxon shares rose 64 cents to close at $71.64 on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares have traded in a range of $56.64 to $79 in the past year.
A service of the Associated Press(AP)
Chevron head: plenty of untapped oil reserves left
Houston Chronicle
Midland Reporter-Telegram
03/04/2007
Email to a friendPost a CommentPrinter-friendlyHearst News Service
HOUSTON -- All the talk of when the world will run out of oil could be rendered irrelevant because of geopolitical issues that block access to untapped reserves, the head of international exploration and production for Chevron Corp.
said Wednesday.
Advertisement
John Watson told energy executives and analysts that the so-called peak oil debate focuses on the level of resources below the ground. He joined the prevailing view of speakers at the Cambridge Energy Research Associates' annual conference in Houston that the planet won't run out of oil anytime soon despite opposing theories that a peak and subsequent drop-off in production is imminent or even ongoing.
"Every time we say we're about to be tapped out, we find new ways to squeeze more out of reservoirs," he said.
Or, they find new wells in hard-to-reach places, like Chevron's huge deepwater Jack discovery last year about 270 miles southwest of New Orleans in the Gulf of Mexico.
But worldwide oil production could still lag behind demand if politics get in the way of access, Watson said.
"The truth is we could still run short of oil, above ground where access and politics come into play," Watson said.
He specifically mentioned lack of access to areas of the Gulf of Mexico, calling it a "great policy contradiction" to promote energy independence in the United States while blocking the ability to drill in off-limits areas of the Gulf.
Watson said other above-ground risks include gaining access when national oil companies control about 80 percent of the world's reserves.
For example, Venezuela's state-controlled oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela, or PDVSA, has long been a minority partner in projects in its oil-rich Orinoco Basin. The six main foreign oil companies involved in Orinoco projects are Chevron, Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips, BP, Total and Norway's state-owned oil company, Statoil.
Venezuela President Hugo Chavez said last month that all the Orinoco fields should "wake up under our control" by May 1.
But the U.S. oil companies say they have yet to discuss anything concrete with the Venezuelan government.
Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson said earlier in the conference that the company was waiting for Venezuelan representatives to sit down with Exxon executives to discuss their objectives. Chevron CEO Dave O'Reilly also said his company won't know much more than Chavez's stated desire to increase Venezuelan ownership in Orinoco projects "until we enter into some dialogue."
Watson said other above-ground risks include higher costs of finding oil that could chill production and the lack of enough engineers and other professionals to replace the industry's aging work force.
"Above-ground peak oil will trump below-ground peak oil every time," Watson said.
CERA released a report last November that took aim at theories that the world has hit or passed the peak of oil production. CERA argues that information from the U.S. Geological Survey shows the world has 3.7 trillion barrels of oil, both tapped and untapped, rather than the 1.7 trillion barrels estimated by some peak-oil theorists.
CERA's outlook includes conventional oil, or that extracted from the ground or in shallow waters offshore, as well as unconventional oil, or that derived from oil-soaked sands, natural gas liquids, coal turned to liquid and shale.
Joseph Bryant, CEO of Houston-based exploration and production company Cobalt International Energy, said at Wednesday's peak oil panel that the industry continues to develop new resources -- just not "super giant" fields.
Bryant said that until technology shows there is nothing new to find, it's difficult to conclude that the planet is running out of oil.
"I do not think there's an endless supply of super giant fields," he said, but they may not be necessary if producers tackle more fields with more efficiency.
©MyWestTexas.com 2007
Oil India to spend over $2 bn overseas
REUTERS[ WEDNESDAY, MARCH 07, 2007 11:20:41 AM]
MUMBAI: Oil India Ltd, which is planning an initial public offering by October, will invest over $2 billion mainly in overseas exploration in the next five years, media reported on Wednesday.
Last week, state-run Oil India said it hoped to raise Rs 15 billion ($338 million) through the IPO by selling a 10 per cent stake and had lined up a capital expenditure of Rs 150 billion to be spread over the next five years.
The paper said Oil India planned to use 20 per cent of the $2 billion investment to fund its entry into refining and marketing.
"Over the next five years, our investment will definitely be much higher than Rs 90 billion already approved, as we have big plans overseas," the newspaper quoted Oil India's chairman and managing director, M R Pasrija, as saying.
"We are keen on acquiring oil assets in the CIS countries, South America and Africa," he was quoted as saying.
Oil India is an operator in an onshore block in Gabon, where it has a 45 per cent interest. It also holds a 25 per cent stake in Suntera Nigeria OPL 205 Ltd.
The firm has a 15 per cent interest in two blocks in Yemen, where India's top refiner, Indian Oil Corp Ltd, holds a similar stake.
Nigeria offers four oil blocks to CNOOC
Beijing. March 7. INTERFAX-CHINA - The Nigerian government has agreed to offer four oil blocks to the China National Offshore Oil Corporation in return for $2.5 billion in low-interest loans that China has offered to Nigeria, according to a report released by Ministry of Commerce today.
The full text of this story is available to subscribers of our weekly and daily news services.
For more information please click here
Related Articles
No Related Articles...
http://www.interfax.cn/displayarticle.asp?aid=21989&slug=NIGERIA-CNOOC
Sao Tome and Principe government wants to use Oil Fund money [ 2007-03-07 ]
Sao Tome, Sao Tome and Principe, 7 March – The government of Sao Tome and Principe wants to use US$23 million from its Oil Fund in order to boost the State Budget for 2007, which is due to be debated Wednesday in the country’s parliament, the Minister of Planning and Finance said.
Maria Tébus told journalists that the need to boost the budget using the national oil fund was mainly due to the archipelago’s debts to its bilateral cooperation partners.
In March 2006, Sao Tome and Principe netted US$28.6 million from three shared production contracts with Nigeria, which are based on a treaty stating that Nigeria receives 60 percent of revenues while 40 percent goes to Sao Tome.
As part of the framework law of Sao Tome oil revenues, the Tébus said that of the US$23 million, most was needed to pay a debt to Nigeria of US$15 million from loans granted over the last four years.
Tébus said that US$3 million would serve to cover the expenses of Sao Tome and Principe being part of a joint administrative and management structure for oil exploration with Nigeria.
The remaining US$5 million from the oil fund would be used to pay down other debts, according to what was established with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, as part of a joint macroeconomic program, which aims to pardon the archipelago’s external debt, estimated at over US$300 million.
“We (the government) work on the budget with the technical support F these two institutions in order to get our debt pardoned," Tébus said, calling on Sao Tome's members of parliament to approve the document attached to the General State Budget for 2007, estimated at around US$100 million.
Having denied the existence of any proposal to increase public workers' salaries, the minister said that the biggest budgetary expenditures were the health and education sectors, as part of the national strategy to combat poverty.
Two months ago, the president of Sao Tome and Principe, Fradique de Menezes, decided to maintain the 2006 state budget due to a delay in finishing the budget for this year.
The 2006 budget included expenses of over US$80 million. (macauhub)
Oily, the Equator share price has dropped about 90% off highs from a year ago........
On the other hand, it's very hard to get information on Peak Petroleum Industries Nigeria Limited...... Their website doesn't help much. I wonder if they are just another Nigerian shell of a company..........
Hmmmm - so which one is the missing piece? I guess the big O is SEO?
NG9
Canada will stay top U.S. oil supplier for 20 years
Ashok Dutta, CanWest News Service; Calgary Herald
Published: Tuesday, March 06, 2007
CALGARY -Canada - which in 2005 replaced Saudi Arabia as the single-largest supplier of energy to the U.S. - will continue that position over at least the next two decades, thanks to the multi-billion dollar oilsands developments in Alberta.
"The projects in Fort McMurray and Athabasca will ensure that Canada remains in the top spot until 2030," Guy Caruso, administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration, said Monday on the sidelines of an industry conference in Calgary.
According to EIA estimates, Canadian exports to the U.S. will reach 2.6 million barrels per day by 2030, compared with current levels of just over one million bpd.
Email to a friend
Printer friendly
Font: ****"Oilsands will account for a vast majority of this incremental exports. The remaining volumes will be sourced from the conventional oil sources in Canada," he said.
Since 9/11, the U.S. has been pursuing a policy of reducing reliance on Middle East oil. Until recently, Saudi Aramco was the single-largest supplier of crude oil to the U.S. under a long-term deal offering a favourable lifting and delivery price. That scenario has changed, however.
In an address to the U.S. Congress late last year, President George W. Bush spoke of the need to decrease 75 per cent dependence on Middle East oil due to volatility in the region.
"We will see a growth in supply from not only Western Canada, but also the Middle East. However, the increased demand will be spread over several Arabian Gulf suppliers and not be solely reliant on Saudi Arabia. A majority of Saudi oil is destined for the Asian markets, particularly China and India," Caruso said.
The U.S. is the world's largest consumer of crude oil, estimated to be 22 million bpd. According to the EIA, demand is projected to grow 30 per cent over the next 25 years with fossil fuels catering to a bulk of the new energy requirements.
Caruso revised upwards EIA's forecasts for crude oil prices for 2007 to $50-55 per barrel, compared with $30-35 earlier.
"The main reasons are high investments, particularly in the Middle East, a growing restriction on upstream access to international oil companies to new reserves and rising cost of project development and implementation. In the past five years, capital costs have risen 50 to 60 per cent and this is continuing to soar," he said.
Saudi Arabia, with proven reserves of 267 billion barrels of crude oil, is pursuing mega projects of bringing onstream the Manifa, Shaybah, Khurais and Nuayyim projects by 2010 in the Eastern Province. A staggering $45 billion is being invested to produce about two million bpd new production capacity. By comparison, some $150 billion is earmarked for investment by 2015 in Alberta's 175-billion barrel oilsands to increase output by about 1.5 million bpd.
While U.S. imports of crude oil from Western Canada is set to rise sharply, a different picture emerges for natural gas.
"U.S. consumption of gas by 2030 will increase to 26 trillion cubic feet from current levels of 22 tcf. However, Canadian supplies will go down to 1.2 tcf compared with 3.3 tcf," Caruso said at the CERI 2007 Natural gas Conference.
Prime reasons are low gas prices, which has made drilling and upstream development unattractive, and also the growing need to meet demand emanating from the oilsands projects.
"In the medium-term, we are looking at the Alaskan gas project which we expect to start deliveries in 2018. Gas from the McKenzie Delta will also be very vital," Caruso said.
adutta@theherald.canwest.com
Calgary Herald
Oil India lines up $2 bn for overseas exploration
Rakteem Katakey / New Delhi March 07, 2007
Oil India (OIL), the government-owned upstream company, has lined up over $2 billion in the next five years to extend its oil and gas assets overseas. About 20 per cent of this investment (about Rs 2,000 crore) will be used to finance its entry into the downstream sector.
“Over the next five years, our investment will definitely be much higher than the
Rs 9,000 crore already approved, as we have big plans overseas,” OIL Chairman and Managing Director MR Pasrija said. “We are keen on acquiring oil assets in the CIS countries, South America and Africa,” he added.
OIL, which has producing assets in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Rajasthan, plans to raise Rs 1,500 crore through an initial public offer (IPO) by offloading 10 per cent of its share capital in October.
Pasrija also said the upstream company is hopeful of picking up stake in Hindustan Petroleum’s 9 million tonne per annum refinery at Bathinda in Punjab. “We are hoping to get a part of HPCL 49 per cent stake in the refinery,” he said.
HPCL is reported to have offered OIL a stake in its new refinery at Vishakapatnam. An OIL team, headed by Pasrija, is scheduled to meet HPCL officials this week for discussions on a possible participation in the refinery. OIL owns oil and gas blocks in Libya, Gabon, Nigeria and Yemen.
“Our business development team is also considering bidding for Devon Energy’s oil blocks in Egypt,” a senior OIL official said.
Prize Petroleum, the exploration arm of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, is also planning to bid for the US-based Devon’s four oil blocks in Egypt. “We have been approached by managers of the sale,” Prize Petroleum’s Chief Executive Officer MN Prasad recently told Business Standard.
Devon had on November 14 said it wanted to divest its oil and gas assets and terminate its operations in Egypt as it wanted to focus elsewhere.
A company source said OIL was also interested in bidding for a stake in Sakhalin-III, but since ONGC Videsh, the wholly owned subsidiary of ONGC, was the preferred government company for oil blocks which required large investments, it dropped the plan.
RIL to hive off offshore oil assets into new company
RAJEEV JAYASWAL & SOMA BANERJEE
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ WEDNESDAY, MARCH 07, 2007 01:52:01 AM]
NEW DELHI: Reliance Industries (RIL), which has kicked off the countdown to its gas production from the KG basin, is now set to transfer all its overseas oil assets to a new company - Reliance Exploration and Production DMCC.
Headquartered in Dubai, the RIL subsidiary will first take over the assets RIL has secured in the West Asian countries.
Modelled on OVL, the investment arm for ONGC’s overseas oil assets, the new RIL subsidiary will be the holding company for all overseas upstream assets in oil and gas. This restructuring is being done to reduce the risks on RIL’s balance sheet as many of these oil assets are in politically risk-prone areas.
RIL, which had confined itself mainly to exploration and production within India, has now taken up overseas expansion in a major way. Armed with its success in the Krishna Godavari deepwaters (KG basin), the company has been looking at opportunities in oil-rich nations including Russia and Central Asian countries. As is the case, most of the new oil assets and opportunities are increasingly being offered in countries facing political turmoil. A recent case is the oil block in Iraq which RIL and OVL are taking up jointly.
“The political risks in these countries are huge and exposing RIL to such uncertainties could impact valuations,” said an analyst. The subsidiary was floated in the third quarter of 2006-07.
RIL has interests in exploration of overseas blocks in Yemen and Oman. RIL has already made oil discoveries in the onshore Malik 9 block in Yemen. The development plan for the block has been approved by the Republic of Yemen and test production commenced in December 2005.
In the Oman offshore block, where RIL is the operator, the existing seismic data has been collected and 2D reprocessing of data is underway. RIL has also signed a Technical Evaluation Agreement with ANH (Columbia’s hydrocarbon regulator) and also entered into a co-operation agreement with Ecopetrol (National Oil Company of Columbia) for farm-in opportunities in that country.
British to reassess STP seismic data
British Geological Survey to reassess seismic data in Sao Tome and Principe [ 2007-03-05 ]
Sao Tome, Sao Tome and Principe, 5 March – The British Geological Survey (BGS) is set to begin a reassessment survey of the seismic data on the existence of oil in the exclusive economic area of Sao Tome and Principe, the Sao Tome National Oil Agency (ANP) said Friday in Sao Tome.
According to ANP's bulletin, the consortium made up of Britain’s BGS and Aupec, will reassess a seismic survey carried out by Petroleum Geo-Service (PGS), of Norway, which was the basis for an agreement signed in 2001 with the Sao Tome authorities.
The process of reassessing the seismic survey, which also has the assistance of the World Bank, is due to be concluded at the beginning of May, according to ANP’s bulletin, published over the weekend in the capital of the archipelago.
PGS’s surveys showed geological structures that may contain hydrocarbons totaling 10,870 square kilometers in deep waters in the seas off the archipelago, in a survey which was intended to assess the existing oil potential in the area.
BGS, which was hired following a public tender launched by ANP, is responsible for producing a specific map of the area, containing the potential division of oil blocs, as well as recommending further seismic surveys.
The reassessment essentially aims to be the basis for an initial auction of blocs in the exclusive economic area of Sao Tome and Principe, planned for the end of 2007, according to the ANP's quarterly bulletin.
As well as its exclusive area, Sao Tome and Principe also has a joint exploration area with Nigeria base don a treaty stating that Nigeria receives 60 percent of revenues while 40 percent goes to Sao Tome.
As well as revenues from the Chevron Texaco bloc, in which the US company has already struck oil, Sao Tome and Principe also expects revenues of a further US$28 million this year from the signing bonus from three joint area blocs. (macauhub)
Claudealain - I don't discredit SEO for his work but I would say, after reading different Nigerian articles on him, I do wonder if he is a front man for President Obasanjo and other top Nigerian officials......... at least, that's what some of the articles state.
I am long and strong on ERHC but I believe it's wise to keep an open mind...... and examine what's going on with SEO, President Obasanjo, and all the corruption within the Nigerian Oil community. All you have to do is read the Nigerian/African newspapers and you can see for yourself.
Now how much of that corruption perception translates to our share price, DOJ, etc......... that's the big question.
ND9
SEO says, "we are not merging yet"....
He's talking about his insurance company but who knows what he's up to.........
ND9
*************************************************
Guinea Insurance plans to raise N3bn
• Tuesday, Feb 27, 2007
Guinea Insurance Plc Plans to raise N3 billion by way of rights issue to its existing shareholders.
The company’s managing director, Nicholas Ojinnaka said the company hopes to raise the amount by offering 4.68 million shares of 50 kobo at 60 kobo per share to current shareholders.
He said,” The money is on ground, what is being done is to put legal effect to the transaction,” adding that the offer will open Wednesday February 21 and end February 23.
According to him, the rights issue is provisionally allotted in the basis of 13 new ordinary shares for every two held by shareholders whose names are in the company’s register as at Wednesday February 7.
It was reported that all insurance companies in the country have up till February 28 to raise their capital base to N2 billion and N3 billion for life and non-life insurance companies respectively.
Guinea Insurance Chairman, Emeka Offor said the rights issue was in line with the slogan “Guinea must stay” which was adopted at the company’s Last AGM as a way to remain in business.
“This offer is being undertaken as an important step towards meeting the minimum capital base as well as executing its strategy towards becoming a dominant player in the insurance industry post-consolidation” he said.
The Chairman said part of the proceeds of the offer would be used to acquire a new corporate head office and also invested strategically in the oil and gas sector.
According to him, “It is not how early or how far but we will end with real cash in place and meet our targets. Guinea Insurance is one of the oldest insurance companies and it will soon meet up with the required capital.
“We are not merging yet, we will make it on our own, so like a beautiful bride, we have to consider our suitors very carefully before any merger arrangements” he noted.
RELATED IN THIS ISSUE
PREVIOUS STORIES
Mar, 1 2007: Those Model Schools SAC backs RSUBEB Action-Plans...more
Feb, 28 2007: FG plans $1m power plant for Ekiti...more
Feb, 28 2007: WAMASON plans to sanitise waste management in Nigeria...more
Feb, 26 2007: Stock market: Oceanic Bank Int’l plans to raise N55bn...more
Feb, 24 2007: 2007: NGO plans to employ 400...more
Feb, 20 2007: RSG plans school for destitutes...more
Feb, 15 2007: FG advised to shun plans to increase fuel price...more
Jan, 29 2007: NATS plans partnership with media...more
Jan, 23 2007: RSG concludes plans for Christian pilgrimage...more
Jan, 18 2007: Apiri Osokolo Cup donor plans for other sports...more
Jan, 14 2007: Badminton Federation plans big for Africa Games...more
Jan, 7 2007: 2007 Presidency: MRDD chairman denies plans to contest...more
Dec, 30 2006: ...plans VIO training school...more
Dec, 27 2006: YABATECH lauds FG over upgrading plans...more
Dec, 21 2006: Hotel plans investment in manpower dev next year...more
The Tide Online is published by Rivers State Newspaper Corporation, 4 Ikwerre Road, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
Contact us | The Tide Story | Today at a glance | Reporters
Send mail to The Editor with questions, comments or remarks about contents of this web site
Nigerian Generational Shift - SEO
2/3/2007
Is This Generational Shift?
President Olusegun Obasanjo may have finally recognised the potentials in the younger generation with the emergence of some young Turks into his cabinet. Joseph Ushigiale writes
----------------------------------------------------------------On May 29, 1999 when President Olusegun Obasanjo assumed the reins of power in the country, one issue that dominated public discourse was the calibre of people he would appoint into his cabinet to help him in running the affairs of the country.
Debate on the shape and character of the cabinet and other appointments to be made by the President centred on the age bracket of those to help him pilot the affairs of state. On this issue, opinion was divided. The majority opinion favoured a cabinet to be composed of youth or those below 50 years of age. The argument is that this group has the zeal, capacity and innovation to meet the demands of the 21st century where e-governance has taken over. Indeed, it was said that the future belongs to the youths, who should be given opportunity to prove their mettle. Little room was made for the old breed politicians who were always being recycled by successive administrations.
As it turned out, when the list of Ministers was made public, Obasanjo disappointed not a few. His cabinet composed mainly of the old brigade politicians who have remained a recurring decimal in the socio-political history of the nation.
The President was told in no mistaken terms that sidelining the youths, many of who had made positive impact in the private sector, in preference for the old brigade was a great disservice to the nation. As it turned out, some are of the view that Obasanjo's first term ended without as much appreciable progress in the polity and the economy, as had been eagerly anticipated. However, opportunity to make amends came after he won a second term. Obasanjo consciously chose a team of tested and talented young men and women whose wealth of experience and exposure have given his government national and international acclaim and goodwill.
Perhaps for the first time in the history of the nation, there are presently a very significant number of young people occupying very important positions in government as Ministers, Directors-General, Chairmen of Boards, etc. However, nowhere is this tendency more noticeable than in the President's choice of Ministers. Those in this category include Mrs. Esther Nenadi Usman, Minister of State for Finance; Chief Chukwuemeka Chikelu, Minister of Information and National Orientation; Mr. Frank Nweke, Minister of Inter-Governmental Affairs; Dr. (Mrs.) Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Minister of Finance; and Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, Minister of Federal Capital Territory. Samaila Balarabe Sambawa (Minister of State Foreign Affairs); Abubakar Saleh (Minister of State Works); Mukhtari Shagari (Minister of Water Resources); Funke Adedoyin (Minister of State Health) and Liyel Imoke (Minister of Power and Steel).
Others include Ms. Ifueko Omoigui, Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service; Professor Charles Chukwuma Soludo (Governor of Central Bank); Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili (Special Asst. to the President on Budget and Due Process); Alhaji Nuhu Ribadu (Chairman of Economic and Financial Crime Commission) and Alhaji Waziri Mohammed (Chairman Nigeria Railway Corporation), among others.
A similar trend of young turks appears to be simultaneously arising in the states. The list include Governors Donald Duke (Cross River); Ahmed Muazu (Bauchi State); Bukola Saraki (Kwara State); Ahmed Makarfi (Kaduna State); Lucky Igbinedion (Edo State); Orji Uzor Kalu (Abia); James Ibori (Delta) and Jolly Nyame (Taraba State), among others.
As in politics, so it is in business. The roll call of younger chief executives include Tony Elumelu (Standard Trust Bank); Nduka Obaigbena (THISDAY Chairman); Sir Emeka Offor (Chrome Oil); Macaulay McPepple; Mr. Femi Otedola (Zenon Oil), Wale Tinubu (Oando); Alhaji Aliko Dangote (Dangote Group), Chief Felix Odimegwu (Nigeria Breweries); Mr. Tayo Aderinokun (Guaranty Trust Bank) and so many others.
One problem that has been faced by developing countries across the world and indeed in Nigeria has been the failure to groom a credible successor generation. In some cases, this negligence is deliberate in order to perpetuate the reign of a few individuals that percolate at the top. Nigeria itself has been a victim of this. For instance, in 1979, all the political parties sought old political gladiators as their flagbearers. The National Party of Nigeria (NPN) that formed government at the centre did the same. Its search led to the emergence of Alhaji Shehu Shagari as President. The same scenario was to play out again in 1983. In 1999, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) went back 20 years to search for a flagbearer. The outcome of its search was Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, who emerged as President of the country.
It is on record that General Ibrahim Babangida experimented with the concept of the new breed in an attempt to change the political landscape by infusing youth and dynamism. However either by design or accident, that experiment floundered. The question to ask as the nation approaches 2007, another election year, is what happens? Will the old breed be enthroned again? It appears that this time around, President Obasanjo has decided to alter the colouration and perhaps the substance of Nigeria's politics and governance by nurturing a successor generation. If so, it is a good omen for the country. Increasingly observers are beginning to ask: Is this the face of a new Nigeria?
Several other countries have witnessed this generational shift and it has served them with fresh ideas and fresh leadership. Those who hold this opinion point to United States of America (USA) under Bill Clinton and George Bush, United Kingdom, under Tony Blair, Russia under Putin as well as other industrialised countries where those at the helm of affairs are in their 40s and early 50s.
In Nigeria, the younger faces in government appear so far to be holding their own creditably particularly in the present cabinet. It is not preposterous to say that these individuals have done a lot to lift the image of this administration through the transparent manner they have piloted affairs of their Ministries. The achievements of these younger Ministers and public officials in their various institutions can be seen through public opinion moulded by the impact of policies on the country. For instance, Dr. Okonjo-Iweala and her colleague, Nenadi Usman have impressed not a few Nigerians and have brought transparency and accountability to public accounts with the publication of allocations to states and local governments.
Another Minister who is also acknowledged as an achiever is Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. El-Rufai has shown a commitment to give a new lease to the capital city. To do this, he has given the city a new look by demolishing illegal structures and enforcing the strict implementation of the Abuja master plan in its unadulterated form. His plan to open up the satellite towns, embark on a peculiar type of mass transit in the Abuja metropolis has all endeared him to the people. Where his predecessors failed, el-Rufai has shown that with a little commitment, government can be made to work for the people. El Rufai has taken a very firm stand against corruption at great personal risk.
One ministry that has brought a revolution to government's information machinery is the Ministry of Information and National Orientation. Chief Chikelu holds forte at the head of the Ministry. In a very short time, he has revived the daily press releases of the Ministry, established a credible monthly magazine, reviewed the laws of parastatals under him, prioritised the film industry and initiated a review of the now archaic national policy on information. He is also now credited with the restoring credibility to government information.
Imbued with oratorical skill, Chikelu has made positive impression in the minds of Nigerians, and he has become a role model for the youths who see in him a good ambassador of his generation.
Also consider the appointment of Professor Soludo as Chief Economic Adviser and lately Governor of Central Bank. As Economic Adviser, Soludo brought an uncanny professionalism in the discharge of his duties. It is said that he, alongside Dr. Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala authored the government's reform document and the New Economic Empowerment Development Strategy (NEEDS), which is envisaged to turn around the economy for a steady growth. Other Ministers in this category include Mr. Frank Nweke (Jnr.) and the newly appointed chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Mrs. Ifueko Omoigui. These officials represent the face of the new Nigeria.
These are the people who are strategically placed to take over the mantle of leadership of this country. They represent a new awakening.
How far can they go? Can they navigate the often perilous minefield that is Nigeria politic? Will they be allowed to mature under the tutelage of a president/statesman in his final term? Nigerians are watching.
The credit however goes to President Obasanjo who has consciously empowered this generation of post-civil war young Nigerians as possible successors to the leadership position of the country and offered Nigeria perhaps for the first time ever, what appears to be an ordered plan for succession.
Addax Petroleum Presents at the RBC Capital Markets' Canadian Energy Summit
(ASSODIGITALE.IT)
Addax Petroleum Corporation (TSX: AXC) ("Addax Petroleum" or the "Corporation") announces that Mr. Jean Claude Gandur, President and Chief Executive Officer, will be presenting at the RBC Capital Markets' Canadian Energy Summit in Banff, Canada on Thursday, March 8, 2007 at approximately 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Chrome Oil is major Indigenous EPC company...
Interesting, maybe I just missed this before - but these words are on the Chrome website. I don't remember the words "major Indigenous EPC".......... hmmmm.
ND9
*********************************************************
http://www.chromeoil.com/board.html
Sir Emeka Offor has led Chrome Oil Services Ltd., from being a small Oil service firm at inception to a major Indigenous EPC company.
http://www.chromeoil.com/board.html
Ibready - nice post - EOM
Senate Indict's VP Atiku and Pres. Obasanjo - The Report
Last View on Thu 1st March, 2007
Last Modified on Wed 28th February, 2007 4:54:40 pm
Author: saharareporters_admin
Nigerian Senate Ad-hoc Committee said that Vice President Atiku Abubakar "abused his office by aiding and abetting the diversion of public funds in the sums of $125 million and $20 million. The report adds: "The President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, and the Federal Executive Council acted in disregard of the law establishing the PTDF. Though the ratification by the Federal Executive Council may mitigate this breach of the law, it however does not absolve the President and the Federal Executive Council." The panel said Atiku should be “sanctioned” but that President Obasanjo should be advised to adhere strictly to the provisions of the laws establishing the PTDF. Click Here to Download the Senate’s PTDF Report Indicting VP Atiku and President Obasanjo – of Corruption, Breaching the Law and Abuse of Office...
Addax buys stake in Batumi Oil terminal
Summary
The Geneva-based, Toronto-listed independent oil company and trader Addax Petroleum has bought a significant stake in the Batumi oil terminal on Georgia's Black Sea coast. The move marks a strategic shift for Addax, which, although an established oil trader in the Caspian, is better known for its exploration and production in activities in West Africa and Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.
At least Addax post results of drilling............
Addax Petroleum announces results of continued appraisal drilling at Taq Taq
Appraisal well TT-05 flows at an aggregate rate of 26,550 barrels per day
CALGARY, March 1 /CNW/ - Addax Petroleum Corporation ("Addax Petroleum")
(TSX:AXC) today announced flow test results for the TT-05 well, the second
appraisal well recently drilled on the Taq Taq field by Taq Taq Operating
Company ("TTOPCO"), the joint venture company formed by Genel Enerji A.S.
("Genel") and Addax Petroleum to carry out the petroleum operations in the Taq
Taq license area.
Two reservoir intervals were tested separately and flowed at an aggregate
rate of 26,550 bbl/d of light oil, measured gravity ranging from 44 to
50 degrees API with low gas oil ratio. The intervals tested were a 105 meter
perforated interval in the Shiranish formation which flowed at a rate of
12,890 bbl/d and a 82 meter interval in the Qamchuga formation which flowed at
a rate of 13,660 bbl/d. Oil flow rates from the Shiranish and Qamchuga
intervals were restricted by 56/64" and 64/64" choke size respectively, and in
each instance, limited by the capacity of the surface testing facilities.
Evaluation of these flow test results is ongoing.
Commenting, Jean Claude Gandur, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Addax Petroleum said: "I am delighted at the continued successful appraisal of
the Taq Taq field and the excellent cooperation amongst the Taq Taq field
partners. I believe that this operational momentum, alongside the constructive
efforts of the Kurdistan Region and Iraq towards finalising a legal framework,
will expedite the development of the Taq Taq field. We believe that the
development of the Taq Taq field can deliver excellent value to the people of
the Kurdistan Region, to the people of Iraq and to our shareholders."
The TT-05 well is located on the crest of the Taq Taq field and was
drilled approximately 580 metres north-northeast of the TT-04 well. The TT-05
well was spudded in late October, 2006 and completed drilling in late
December, 2006 at a total depth of 2,070 metres. Testing commenced in
mid-February, 2007.
Interpretation of data acquired, including wireline and core data,
confirm the presence of a significant and extensive fracture system as
observed in the TT-04 well. The TT-05 well was the second of an initial three
well drilling program by Genel and Addax Petroleum. The drilling of the third
appraisal and development well, TT-06, is now in progress. The TT-06 well
location is approximately 3.6 kilometres north-northwest of the TT-05 well.
The Taq Taq field is located in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq some 60
kilometres northeast of Kirkuk, 85 kilometres northeast of Erbil and 120
kilometres northwest of Sulaimaniyah.
About Addax Petroleum
Addax Petroleum is an international oil and gas exploration and
production company with a strategic focus on Africa and the Middle East. Addax
Petroleum is one of the largest independent oil producers in West Africa and
has increased its crude oil production from an average of 8,800 barrels per
day for 1998 to an average of approximately 90,000 barrels per day for 2006.
Further information about Addax Petroleum is available at
www.addaxpetroleum.com or at www.sedar.com
Legal Notice - Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release constitute forward-looking
statements under applicable securities legislation. Such statements are
generally identifiable by the terminology used, such as "anticipate",
"believe", "intend", "expect", "plan", "estimate", "budget", "outlook" or
other similar wording. Forward-looking information includes, but is not
limited to, reference to business strategy and goals, future capital and other
expenditures, reserves and resources estimates, drilling plans, construction
and repair activities, the submission of development plans, seismic activity,
production levels and the sources of growth thereof, project development
schedules and results, results of exploration activities and dates by which
certain areas may be developed or may come on-stream, royalties payable,
financing and capital activities, contingent liabilities, and environmental
matters. By its very nature, such forward-looking information requires Addax
Petroleum to make assumptions that may not materialize or that may not be
accurate. This forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown
risks and uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results,
levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such information. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
imprecision of reserves and resources estimates, ultimate recovery of
reserves, prices of oil and natural gas, general economic, market and business
conditions; industry capacity; competitive action by other companies;
fluctuations in oil prices; refining and marketing margins; the ability to
produce and transport crude oil and natural gas to markets; the effects of
weather and climate conditions; the results of exploration and development
drilling and related activities; fluctuation in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates; the ability of suppliers to meet commitments; actions
by governmental authorities, including increases in taxes; decisions or
approvals of administrative tribunals; changes in environmental and other
regulations; risks attendant with oil and gas operations, both domestic and
international; international political events; expected rates of return; and
other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Addax Petroleum. More
specifically, production may be affected by such factors as exploration
success, start-up timing and success, facility reliability, reservoir
performance and natural decline rates, water handling, and drilling progress.
Capital expenditures may be affected by cost pressures associated with new
capital projects, including labour and material supply, project management,
drilling rig rates and availability, and seismic costs. These factors are
discussed in greater detail in filings made by Addax Petroleum with the
Canadian provincial securities commissions.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors
affecting forward-looking information is not exhaustive. Furthermore, the
forward-looking information contained in this press release is made as of the
date of this press release and, except as required by applicable law, Addax
Petroleum does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise
any of the included forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking information
contained in this press release is expressly qualified by this cautionary
statement.
%SEDAR: 00023043E
For further information: Mr. Patrick Spollen, Investor Relations, Tel.:
+41 (0) 22 702 95 47, patrick.spollen@addaxpetroleum.com; Mr. Craig Kelly,
Investor Relations, Tel.: +41 (0) 22 702 95 68,
craig.kelly@addaxpetroleum.com; Mr. Mac Penney, Press Relations, Tel.: (416)
934 80 11, mac.penney@cossette.com; Ms. Marie-Gabrielle Cajoly, Press
Relations, Tel.: +41(0) 22 702 94 44,
marie-gabrielle.cajoly@addaxpetroleum.com
Angolan businesspeople travel to Sao Tome and Principe Monday [ 2007-03-01 ]
Luanda, Angola, 1 March – A delegation of businesspeople from Angola are due to travel to Sao Tome and Principe Monday for a four-day visit to meet with local businesspeople in order to set u potential partnerships, Angolan news agency Angop reported.
Angop cited the director for marketing and communication of the Angola Chamber of Commerce and Industry (CCIA), Avelino Miguel, as saying that nine companies would take part in the business mission, including Banco Africano de Investimentoss, Panec Lda, Cafangola and Chicoil.
The visit by Angolan businesspeople to Sao Tome and Principe is a part of a move by the governments of both countries to increase public and private investment by encouraging initiatives to set up partnerships between companies.
In order to do this, the Angolan government is to grant credit lines for Angolan companies to invest in Sao Tome and Principe. (macauhub)
Friday, March 02, 2007
Share this story!
VIEW: Nigeria’s turning point —Jonathan Power
After a few days spent in the seeming chaos of Lagos one senses the desperate urge for economic endeavour. Now that investors can safely come in, entrepreneurs can more easily get in and out of the docks and airport, and money can be moved easily by Nigeria’s burgeoning e-commerce system, it must be only a matter of time before Lagos becomes another Calcutta, or — who dare say no? — Shanghai
The popular mood is mainly sour in Africa’s largest nation. If President Olusegun Obasanjo were to run again for a third term in April, which is what he wanted to do, but was retrained by the constitution, he would probably lose. If you are poor in Nigeria it is hard to appreciate the progress that impresses the businessmen, the bankers and, most importantly, the International Monetary Fund. For the man or the woman in the street, all that can be seen is large-scale unemployment, rising fuel prices, more erratic electricity supplies and declining facilities in village health care clinics.
Bravely, the government has decided to increase fuel prices yet again early this year in an attempt to improve the deficit, but the great mass of car and motorbike drivers who clog every street in every town are incensed. Twenty years of misrule by one bad military leader after another left an indelible mark, and the cumulative degradation of basic facilities has been hard to turn around in the space of Obasanjo’s eight years of exuberant but demanding democracy.
It is on the macro level that he has scored and that has only become apparent in his second term when he has been more free to bring in his own people, not least the all-woman top team at the finance ministry, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Nenadi Usman, who have pruned, kicked and prosecuted until the corrupt old ways of doing federal business have been reshaped beyond all recognition. Spending is now carefully controlled, the banking system has been overhauled and rapacious bankers sent to jail, contracts have been made honest and the privatisation program and the reform of the energy sector has steamed ahead. Last year Nigeria was removed from the list of non-compliant countries in the global fight against money-laundering, at which Nigerians excelled.
The IMF sent in a team in December to examine the economy. They said in their report that “GDP growth and increases in per capita income have doubled in the last five years compared with the previous two decades”. Headline inflation is down to single digits. And reserves rose to $41 billion despite Nigeria repaying all its massive debts. The hedge funds are investing in Nigerian currency and its credit rating has so improved that Nigeria is now issuing bonds on the global market. Companies such as Mittal are beginning to invest, not just in the once moribund steel sector as one would expect, but in the energy sector too. The Chinese are planning to resuscitate one decaying railroad line and the South Koreans another. Five years ago the majority of Nigeria’s drugs were faked. Now the possibility that a drug is a fake has dropped to 17%, according to the World Health Organization.
Economic growth is consistently around an annual 7% rate, with a surprising 8% growth in the non-oil sector, mainly because of a surge in agricultural production, which has been sustained through years of both plentiful and poor rain. Few in the diplomatic community laughed when the central bank governor in a recent speech said that Nigeria could become the “China of Africa” with a 10% growth rate within five years.
After a few days spent in the seeming chaos of Lagos, where a city of 20 million appears to be hyperactive, one senses the desperate urge for economic endeavour. Now that investors can safely come in, entrepreneurs can more easily get in and out of the docks and airport (unrecognisable from eight years ago), and money can be moved easily by Nigeria’s burgeoning e-commerce system, it must be only a matter of time before Lagos becomes another Calcutta, or — who dare say no? — Shanghai.
However, there are plenty of people who shake their heads — not just the rank and file electorate, but diplomats, especially American ones, who still see the massive problems: the slow arrival of more power stations, the inadequate electrical grid, the mal-administration, the growing crime rate, the corruption of the police, the deteriorating roads and schools and, not least, the fast increase of kidnappings and extortion by armed gangs in the oil producing Niger delta.
The election is a bitter one. Obasanjo has fallen out with his vice president who is now running against Obasanjo’s own nominee. The third candidate is an ex hardline military dictator. With the popular mood as it is, the race is wide open. But even the severe critics in the American compound believe that if the election is more or less fair and civil peace continues, none of the three candidates can turn back the clock and Nigeria will continue with its reforms, democracy and forward progress.
The writer is a leading columnist on international affairs, human rights and peace issues
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C03%5C02%5Cstory_2-3-2007_pg3_5