Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
moonie ...
you're all over the place these days!
hardly know or care where to begin with you ... so think I'll just let you ramble on and on.
Thanks, moonie ...
for recognizing my contribution to the cause.
xo,
Amy
moonface ...
sorry I don't have time to play games with you these days.
too busy making money.
An interesting comparison elsewhere with late 1999 ... when the pps moved up to almost $1 on no news. Of corse it took the really bigg news about Croatia to send it skyward.
Oh wait, that was all rigged, I almost forgot.
I wonder how many friendly MMs malcbaby knows.
Plus ca change.
edit -- oh dear, a typo.
I see hi-c thinks there's a serious connection between TX Children's/Dallas and /Houston re cdex.
Why limit it to TX? What about Children's in Chicago? Surely they must be connected and have heard of cdex, now that it's getting such phenomenal publicity.
Yawn. (tm li'l diddy)
gee, you're really wound up tonight, moonie ... such a bunch of vitriole!
Shades of Croatia ...
Tests have been done on the device, but none of the results have been independently verified.
"Anytime you have testing of a device by someone who stands to make a lot of money off of it, I am always suspect of that," said Stacie Bilyeu, a Springfield defense attorney. "If the testing was done by unbiased, nonpartisan groups, the results would be more reliable."
Who stood to make a lot of money off the (rigged) Croatia "testing"? Vlado for starters, then boonie and all the others on down the line. Maybe even malcbaby, at the top of the pyramid.
They didn't even go back to Croatia for the second round of "tests". And when the Norwegians invited "Doctor" Henry and friends to bring their "expertise" into their organization, they didn't accept the invitation.
Plus ca change.
Why didn't you post the balance of the article, paige?
Do you suppose capndagoodwow furnished Ozarks (Ozarks ?! Sounds pretty back woods) the article? Or did they discover li'l ol' loch/cdex all by their lonesome?
Answer on a postcard, plz.
(edit -- with help like that, from dagoodcapn, who needs enemies?)
I hope those who have lost so much on paper have NOW made some of it back, on the back of yesterday's pump. Those who've bought more, thinking the Holy Grail is in sight, need their heads examined.
Remember the demo on the Capitol steps?
Plus ca change.
Same here. Are you capable of one? Are you capable of answering any questions whatsoever? You can start now.
What does the price per share after today's tremendous rise equate to in loch dollars (or cents)?
What's caused it?
Will it last?
You can take them in order or out of order, if you prefer.
oh wow, be still my beating heart.
(just so you won't be disappointed, moonie, that comment's just for you)
but tell me ... what is that equal to pre-pre, in loch dollars, or would it be cents? anything close to where clozer sold and got so bloated he could hardly stand himself? (why didn't you sell then, too? no foresight?)
and whatowhat is the cause of this incredible rise?
how long will it last?
enquiring minds want to know.
welp ... I clearly misunderstood osscout's earlier post. Seems he's still an optimist, maybe hoping for a new taxi driver (again).
By: osscout
22 Oct 2007, 05:12 AM EDT
Msg. 36961 of 36965
(This msg. is a reply to 36952 by milchip.)
Jump to msg. #
By: osscout
21 Oct 2007, 05:54 AM EDT
Msg. 36950 of 36953
(This msg. is a reply to 36937 by milchip.)
Jump to msg. #
Chip
It's 3 words-- repeat them carefully .... I was wrong.... and then let it go!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nice to see you're being honest, scout. If you're reading this, give my regards to karlspanger.
Why not, kires?
According to Webster's, integrity is defined as a firm adherence to a code of esp moral or artistic values; the quality or state of being complete or undivided ... syn: honesty; ant: duplicity.
I think I've firmly adhered to my code/values and hence my position about this wunnerful company. In case you don't remember my position: loch/cdex has been a scam from the gitgo, just one of several perpetrated by a ring of conmen (and women).
But akshally, malcbaby could give you a better example, esp of the ant duplicity, by which example you can better understand integrity.
Do your homework.
Oh yes, integrity ... the good capn is just full of that. But omygawd! What a mindblowing PR! The beat goes on.
Caveat emptors should be permanently tattooed all over malcbaby's body.
You'd like to think that, moonface.
But back on topic: I note you haven't pulled any sales info about this here wunnerful company's wunnerful products.
Y-zat? Can't find anything?
Be patient, drumbah ... moonie's looking for some sales.
Moot? Is that how 'moot' is defined? Are you now a specialist in legal terminology? More to the point, why don't you post what I asked you to, something/anything about cdex/loch sales, for comparison purposes? Nothing to post, is that why?
That's okay, my point has been made (again) -- a point you continually beg me to make.
Just for you, moonie: (edited)
http://www.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=22742915&epic=MDX
Notice the words "further extends existing international sales."
Also note:
"Dexo Germany will be launching an analgesic
product, using Meldex International's TabWrapTM technology, by the end of 2007."
That's a really really big milestone, moonface ... which of course you know, since you fully understand TabWrap. Wonder what analgesic product that might be?
And now, for comparison, will you kindly post any information you can find about recent loch/cdex "sales"?
(edit) How could I have forgotten to point out this:
"Manufacturing Agreement
Meldex is also pleased to announce that it has commenced a long term
manufacturing agreement with a large undisclosed party for XGELTM film. The
contract has forecasted annual revenue of $5-6m which has commenced immediately.
The contract remains well within the capacity of the Group's manufacturing
capability."
That film's sort of at the heart of things, which I'm sure you know. What's at the heart of things with cdex/loch? Oh wait, I remember ... it was elf.
Hang on a moment, whitey ... have something for you to read.
He's not even a minor co-perp, crow!
Just a loud mouth wannabesumbuddy ... remember Brando, "On the Waterfront"? "I coulda been SUMbody!"
As for paige ... don't confuse her with the facts.
Here's one that makes the principals of cdex/loch look like rank amateurs.
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Rocking the foundations of Capitalism
Britains regulators in the securities industry rule with a very light touch compared to other juristctions.
This has seen a huge influx of companies foreign and domestic which have chosen to list in the UK, accessing what is becomming the world's favourite capital market. Small companies are chosing to list on AIM (the alternative Investment Market) precisely because of the cheap and easy regulatory regime which allows small companies access to the capital markets.
But light touch regulation can be abused and the principle underpinning the City of London's suceess is under threat if those regulators do not do their job. At present FSA rules demand brokers have certain pieces of information before we can deal. Typically we must verify the identity of the individual and have some idea where the money has come from.
This can be a major irritation, constantle bombarding clients for ID when anyone who's up to nefariousness will have the relevant ID and documentation in place and to hand simply to not arouse suspicion. So there is a lot of misplaced regulatory effort expended ticking boxes, when there are companies whose actions shake investor confidence in the entire market.
A company can put poorly checked information, in Langbar international's case a mere £390,000,000 overstatement of assets (a later investigation by Kroll said that they could "verify neither the existence of nor Langbar's claim to any of the assets") then someone is clearly not doing their job.
Langbar is Britian's largest ever stockmarket fraud, and it was perpetrated in the open. Those who invested near the top of the market did so on the back of a statement saying that some $297m dollars had been transferred to Holland, ABN Amro, no less. At nearly a pound a share, this meant that the then price, 80 p or so was a 20% discount to Cash in a respectable European bank. Clearly any remaining money in Brazil, some $370m was a bonus, and the buy case was obvious.
Apparently, the documentation on which this was released was a laughably ameteurish fraud. A journalist ringing the Banco Do Brazil yielded the information that "term deposits are not offered outside Brazil" and no-one at ABN Amro had heard of Langbar. There were insiders selling left, right and centre yet no-one on the exchange wondered why a cash shell, trading at a massive discount to NAV was plummetting. It was The Chief Executive, Pearson who called a halt - citing burmudan takeover law to force a founder shareholder, Dr. Mariusz Rybak to reveal his dealings. Where was the FSA enforcing insider dealing legislation? The Stock exchange must have been suspicious of trading activity which went so contrary to the published accounts. What about the NOMAD, did they not Know their Client?
If you can't trust the RNS statements in the market then you can't trust anything, and we might as well invest in snake-oil. We rely on the regulators and market to keep companies honest. It is the Quid-pro quo for enduring their bureaucracy.
Someone defrauded the shareholders of Langbar. It could have been Stuart Pearson, It could have been Gironella Velasco, the auditors in spain, who clearly didn't make the most basic of checks, and may have been complicit. There are other potential culprits. Lambert (supposedly a vehicle for south american Jews), Dr Mariusz Rybak, and a host of other colourful characters. The Serious Fraud Office is investigating. The court cases will rumble on for years and the only winners will be the Lawyers. The shareholders, as usual will get nothing.
Basically someone picked up a load of stock at less than 2p and unloaded it at 50-80p. That's got to be worth a couple of years in gaol if the size is sufficient. All they needed to do is convince the market that cash in a south american bank was there, watch the shares rise and sell at a massive profit.
It turned out to be too easy.
It's all but over, crow ... it might take another year or more to finally die (unless of course it's "shelled" into another scam by the same people who made out like bandits here), but it's all but over in its present incarnation.
I've watched pretty closely another stock go through long and painful death throes over the past five or so years and though that company really did have technology that worked (in the medical device field), wasn't a scam in any shape or form, it couldn't make it, even with new management put in place at regular intervals. Very sad.
How loch/cdex has lasted even this long -- a scam from the start, one of a ring of scams with many of the same cast of characters -- is beyond me.
Predictable that you'd somehow bring this erudite discussion board back to hairdresser drama.
Ya know, paige ,,, the world doesn't revolve around you and your prollems. I'm sure that's hard for you to believe, but it's really really true.
I have it ... just not sure if I want to talk to you, after your total and cavalier disregard for my frail, sensitive nature.
Oh well ... curiosity always gets the best of me. I'll try you tomorrow or during the week.
well, with three out of four, things can't be too bad!
It's cod (I think) ... but rotten will pay dearly for causing my blue funk. We black wi... I mean we scorpios don't get mad, we get even.
(Getting nervous, rotten?)
I'm through sulking.
rotten ... I can keep a secret. You know that!
I have to wait til next summer? That's grossly unfair. Who else, I ask you, has been so strong a supporter, past and present (after a few initial rough moments)? Introduced you to her friends? DIDN'T EVEN ASK FOR A COMMISSION, UPFRONT OR AFTER THE FACT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hmmmmmmmph.
See if I ever offer to help you again.
Now I'm gonna go sulk for a while.
oh good ... now it's going to get fun again.
This board isn't as much fun as it used to be ...
what a shame.
welllllllllll ...
are you going to tell me more? Like what and from whom? And whether it was useful or not? Our friendship may be at stake over this ...
vty
you know who
No idea what you're talking about, paige, but maybe tomorrow I'll catch up and understand.
hey, rotten ...
Patsy and Bill are about to give up hearing from you! Put them to work ... especially Bill ... he has MUCH too much time on his hands. While you're at it, ask him where Amelia Earhart's plane r e a l l y crashed (and was found).
OT just for whitemoonman (no one else here would be interested, except p'raps capndawow):
http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/news/ng.asp?n=79814-bioprogress-meldex-international-barr-pliva...
"It's been a busy year so far ..."
Oh, commodore mike: has cdex been profiled by InPharma yet? I'm sure there are some articles (not paid promotions) out there somewhere. Will you link them, please?
When did he get promoted to Commodore? I missed that!
This is just too funny ...
I think we will see all of this come together by the end of the year. At some point, when we begin operating in the black, we may be getting a lot of attention by new investors and perhaps even companies wanting to buy us out.
sassy's "out and about" in TX today (she says) ... maybe she's looking for some lost souls to mother; maybe she should meet pookie in Las Vegas and go on a crusade together. What a pair they would make, especially if standaman goes along with them, with clozer as relief pitcher! But I think the stone gated community in Dallas would be off limits.
STILL waiting for capndawow to fill in dablanks.
I do wish capnwow would give us the benefit of his research, don't you?
I didn't read the filing, crow ... how short (or long) is short-term, do you s'pose?