Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Letter to be send to everyone in the congress/senate.And it needs to be sent on a weekly basis for a while on behalf of the FNMA/FMCC shareholders
Letter to be send to everyone in the congress/senate.And it needs to be sent on a weekly basis for a while on behalf of the FNMA/FMCC shareholders. It's the only remaining choice.
This letter to be send to everyone in the congress/senate.And it needs to be sent on a weekly basis for a while on behalf of the FNMA/FMCC shareholders
Wait until 2030 and vast majority of the shareholders wouldn't be around. The remaining 10%-20% of the shareholders would continue dream about the future.
PPS would stay at 0.20-0.30.
There are no good news for the shareholders, and it has a negative impact on PPS
regardless of the market performance.
Lamberth calendar until 02/28/2023 doesn't include retrial, but could be updated later
if required.
Day after day,month after month, year after year and there are no good news
for the shareholders. Ten more years and 80-90% of the shareholders wouldn't exist anymore.
Any updates on the Michael ROP vs FHFA, Fairholme vs FHFA trials dates?
Any updates on the dates of the Michael Rop vs FHFA, Fairholme vs FHFA trials?
No matter what would be written at this site, there is no change to the existing PPS.
Just send e-mails,letters to the stakeholders,Rop, Ackman,etc. Plaintiffs legal team, as well as Lamberth, need to be replaced at the next trial. Otherwise result is predictable.
Plaintiffs legal team performance is a failure. Berkowitz,Ackman need a new legal team. Let's send e-mails to Berkowitz, Ackman,and other stakeholders. Don't wait. Just do it.
Agree. Berkowitz needs a new legal team. Let's send e-mails to Berkowitz, Ackman,
and other stakeholders
FNMA/FMCC PPS would change, if some good news would come of the courts.
Otherwise months after month, year after year without any changes.
Need to wait for the Michael Rop vs FHFA, and another Fairholme vs FHFA.
At least end of Q1 2023.
Trial: 17-497 Rop vs FHFA. Circuit Judge GIBBONS, J.
Case No. 20-2071 Rop v. Fed. Housing Fin. Agency.
can we all collectively draft a tweet and tweet to the plaintiffs team and stakeholders?
Absolutely, it's needs to be done.
Shareholders need to notify plaintiffs team and stakeholders:
1. No further delays to be allowed.
2. Motion to request a new judge at this trial to be submitted.
3. Only experienced/knowledgeable jurors to be selected, since it's a very complicated case.
A new trial must be brought within 90 days of the date the trial court declared a mistrial.
Plaintiffs team needs to submit a motion, that a new judge is requested at the new trial.
Jurors are in very difficult situation. They do not have a complete understanding
of depositions and facts, and do not have clear records of the above mentioned.
Expected result by tomorrow: 80% mistrial, 20% some kind of a guess to be named
decision. Let's wait and see what would happened.
Let's wait until Tuesday and see what would happened. In order for Jurors to make
a correct decision, it requires certain level of experience and knowledge.It doesn't look that they have it. And plaintiffs team failed to recognize it.
Jury decision would be announced by tomorrow, but if it's a 1.6b it would be plaintiffs team/shareholders failure and plaintiffs team members do not deserve to be paid.
This info needs to be provided to the stakeholders.It's them, who agreed to numerous
delays starting from 2012 until 2022.
Instead of utilize your energy to write comments at this site, send an e-mail to the
stakeholders for this case,plaintiffs team,senators,congressmen and etc.Not sure
it would help, but at least it will represent shareholders opinion.
And one more time, I consider plaintiffs team last 10 years performance as a complete failure,that got this case into 2022. Such plaintiffs team members performance do not deserve to get paid, if the shareholders reward would be 1.6B. And this shareholders
opinion needs to be known to the plaintiffs team members and stakeholders for this case.
It started not today or yesterday,but in 2012(i even didn't mention 2008).
Plaintiffs team put up a terrible performance, by allowing and agree to endless
delays of the court, and this is how we got into 2022.
I don't know what would happened on Tuesday,but if shareholders get 1.6B,
it's a worst result we could expect. I remind, that a lot of shareholders are not a
spectators, but a participants at this court(it's relevant to the shareholders of FMCC
commons and FNMA/FMCC preferred), who received letters from the brokerage companies.
And You could notify Plantiffs team via e-mail, or make a phone call in order to provide Your opinion.
Let's wait until Tuesday and see what would happened. In order for Jurors to make
a correct decision, it requires certain level of experience and knowledge.