Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I did not see this part of the article so I am sorry. I thought they just ran on hydrogen.
The system to be provided to Innovametall Stahl- und Metallbau, which will provide efficient, on-site power to a powder coating production facility in Freistadt, will be designed in a hybrid configuration in which solar panels installed on the roof of the Innovametall industrial hall will provide renewable electricity. The excess electricity not required for production will be used to generate hydrogen, which will be used to fuel the microturbines. From there, the exhaust from the turbines will be captured and used in the facility's powder coating furnace.
I read the same thing. Hydrogen capture is in testing but I could find no revenue from hydrogen. Their turbines are based on methane. Their goal is for their microturbines to run on 100% hydrogen and they just received their first hydrogen microturbine order in May that is intended to run on hydrogen.
Sounds like FCEL and PLUG.
Non sequitur is a literary device that includes STATEMENTS, sayings, and conclusions that do not follow the fundamental principles of logic and reason.
Specious argument and non-sequitur to be honest.
He stated the facts quoted by Capstone which blows away FCEL. Yes facts. Their website clearly states those facts.
No it isn't
Opinion: Fossil Fuel Companies Must Turn to Hydrogen for a Carbon-Free Economy.
Let's emphasize the first word in that headline please.
But the bill, the bill, the bill. It specifically says that billions of dollars will be spent and sent directly to Fuel Cell Energy. No other company just FCEL so once they have all that money they will magically turn a profit. lol
We call it no profit or a loss which LOGICALLY follows my last statement.
Hype is not profit.
Quote: While fundamentals are most often considered factors that relate to particular businesses or securities, national economies, and their currencies also have a set of fundamentals that can be analyzed.
Other fundamentals such as micro and macro economics effect all stocks and are short term reasons for declines and rises. Real fundamentals such as profit, loss, revenue, etc. Economic?????????????? Wow.
Up .46% ???????????????????? lol
This is the factual DD that everyone needs not smoke screens and promises of great things to come and NO PROFIT.
And yes I believed it all and enjoyed the ride.
It's fun looking back on when there was huge momentum but no real FCEL specific news and no profit. Feb of this year.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=161625584
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=161527873
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=161600601
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=161533048
I saved your post and will circle back to you on that in 6 months. I hope they do.
So I choose a 30 min chart to make my decisions for my retirement fund.
TOTAL B.S.
Yep same guy that said it would go to $7 when it was overbought with no profits when it was at $27. I think that happened
So it's not market manipulation by Blackrock?
He was the one that said it was going from $27 to $6 and it did.
??????????????????????????????
Those are top rated analysts not specific FCEL analysts. these are the analysts listed on FCEL's website that cover FCEL.
https://investor.fce.com/stock-information/analyst-coverage/default.aspx
And this is what is typically called overbought and the typical reaction is for the stock to fall drastically when there are no fundamentals or news or more specifically PROFIT. And I do believe that is what happened in this case unless you consider a 70% drop insignificant.
And yes I have said many times that this stock will jump big time WHEN it turns a profit. Tesla was 18 years and FCEL is at 24 and counting and still negative.
Elon Musk that's my answer
FCEL short % is 15.3 which is pretty middle of the road compared to most other NASDAQ stocks. In comparison Blink charging is at 37.4%.
Tick Tock the world needs peace, healthcare for all, a cure for cancer, and many other things but that does not always happen and the stock market and companies involved with it depend on performance and profit not what ifs and possible projects.
But the guy named Hawk was a specialist.
You tube videos with a young guy named Hawk does not!!!! suggest factual evidence.
You tube videos????
And has nothing to do with facts.
If all those come true and FCEL starts to be profitable then all is well and to the moon but unfortunately a lot of ifs and net losses still. I hope it happens and just so you know of the many boards I follow your posts represent the most knowledge and insight of any.
Basically if a stock does poorly individual investors like to blame big investment companies for the downfall of the stock the invested instead of the companies poor performance or lack of generating profits. It is common and often an incorrect judgement.
You used posts (chat) from Reddit and griproom and articles from Reuters from 2014. Great post NOT!
PLUG said the same thing. It's the future but the future will be 10, 15, or 20 years away meanwhile back at the real world there are no profits.
But nothing is good hard facts and profit. It is all in the future.
I was going to say the same thing about the chart and a reverse split.
FCEL IS THE GREATEST COMPANY IN AMERICA
This is the link in the post.
https://www.capstonegreenenergy.com/solutions/microgrid