Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is it too Hard to have an Investor Relations department?
Yep, 10Q non-event. And more than likely missing pertinent info that we'd need to make a well informed analysis. I feel certain it refects their situation in the brightest light possible (as good or better as that may be) and is mostly fluff with omission of the most unpleasant aspects as permitted by GAAP.
Non Event, misleading at worse.
They have indeed made blatant lies in just the past year. They may not be deemed technically "criminal", but they have lied in egregious and unnecessary ways.
How those lies may or may not continue or, at least, come back to bite them in the arse
is still left to be seen.
It's easy to follow dcth closely since 2003 when you're an apologist-associate. That is why your posts ring hollow.
Unless I'm mistaken, I've not seen about posts by you addressing the blatant lies this company told shareholders prior to 2013 about product efficacy which ultimately was deemed to be criminal and ended with a successful lawsuit against the company.
That alone doesn't mean the product hasn't been improved nor does that alone prove that corruption is ongoing.
Other new developments, however, would suggest that they've not collectively learned their lesson even with new blood in the BoD.
.
L
O
L
Bond, I commend you;
excellent post!
.
But sometimes, it does. Greek carrier DryShips sold vast sums of discounted shares to an offshore firm and propped up prices with ‘reverse splits,’ sending investors on a wild ride that, for many, ended with steep losses.
___ ____
When a company’s stock drops 99.9% in six months, there’s probably a story there. When, despite that carnage, the company’s assets double during the same period, even more so.
And when 1.68 million of the company’s shares held early last year equal exactly one share today, well, what is going on?
Drys was indeed eventually issued a SEC subpoena.
.
TheGreatGuy, it's very entertaining that you'd take the time to share my reply to you via the Exchange forum, yet you had no response to my reply on iHub forum.
L
O
L
.
GreatGuy, among other things, many of us "Have" contacted news outlets including "national" news outlets.
"Some" national news outlets are still reviewing info they've received.
What have "you" done?
TTS, we're talking about dcth. BK would make sense for a legitimate company in such financial dire straits.
But knowing dcth's shady history, I think the games
will continue.
.
Addendum: but we have to remember that dcth cannot be accurately assessed because it doesn't operate like a
legitimate company.
.
I think DonDon paints an accurate picture of a
possible scenario.
Also, depending on
accuracy of 10-Q,
and assuming this is a
legit operation,
unless revenue has really rocketed since April 1st,
they'd need
to raise big $$,
reduce spending,
sell within few days
or file BK.
Bond, I'm not quite convinced that the source of the $5m is "worried". If they're also one of the entities who are profiting heavily from shorting (illegally or legal) then that $5m was a mere tiny token to play for bigger money.
.
C'mon Dcth crooks,
you've no need for us; give us a spike and we'll never buy again.
You obviously have no respect for retail; in fact, you've screwed them in nearly every metaphorically way possible.
Tell your shorting
cohorts-in-crime to
lay off for just one Damn day.
(1) There's much truth and wisdom in your post.
(2) It's not a select "few" who have access.
(3) I've never posted anything without a supporting link or a clue as to how to access the stated claim on your own.
(4) My understanding is that the Activist Shareholders Website (unrelated to #s 2-3)
has Not been "taken down" but that it's being updated.
(5) I do not know you and much of my "own" evidence has sensitive personal identifying info attached.
ie: full names, addresses, phone numbers, etc.
(6) With all due respect, I will not be "quiet"; there are those who have been led to their own findings by reading my claims because they do the footwork and research to verify it if I'm unable to share full proof on "this" particular forum.
(7) Several attempts at posting certain findings get removed from here almost immediately.
(8) Have a good evening.
(9) Good luck ;)
Jmd, Re: Law of Polarity.
Destruction begets Creation and Creation ultimately begets Destruction.
When supernovae explode, they blast matter into space at some 9,000 to 25,000 miles (15,000 to 40,000 kilometers) per second. These blasts produce much of the material in the universe—including some elements, like iron, which make up our planet and even ourselves. Heavy elements are only produced in supernovae, so all of us carry the remnants of these distant explosions within our own bodies. How cool is that?
The profane and ignorant masses looking from the outside might say, “Oh, how sad…that star just exploded. It’s gone.” :…(
Their perception of the event is lop sided. (one sided)
…but the Adept, (the Master) sees both Destruction and Creation taking place simultaneously.
He sees truth.
Yet this theory cannot be abused to excuse away bad behavior; there's a line.
But, will you be like one of the profane?
Or
Will you be like the Adept?
The choice is yours.
In the mean time,
Emitte lucem et veritatem.
.
What you may not realize is that it "is" all posted online via web files and hard copy files in hand. Several people have access to it... And no, I'm not talking about the Activist Shareholders Site.
As I stated before, and as you well-know, everyone single retail investor on this board (excluding the paid pumpers and bashers who have another agenda) have equal ability to research and access at "least" the same info that I myself have obtained.
Yes, the sun is shining and will be setting soon.
TP, several posters on this board have ample evidence to support such.
I've already "blown my whistle" in all the right directions and everyone here has equal access to the same resources.
There's a big Difference in blowing your whistle and blowing your cover.
Time will tell. Even if they ever get FDA, they could've gotten it sooner with better management.
Retail investors' trading-strategy/savvy notwithstanding, this company's management and shady dealings has been a train wreck for this product.
.
.
Not one poster has implied that money isn't needed for this company, at least not one that I can recall.
What "you" fail to acknowledge (for whatever opportunistic reason) is that this (and former) BoD only cares about the money needed to sustain their exorbitant salaries.
In a previous post, you likened this to a baseball game; you shot down your own argument.
Certainly you're aware that baseball team managers are swiftly kicked to the curb when they don't produce.
And in the case of the great Pete Rose, he quickly learned how fast your legacy can disappear when you gamble on your sport. I can only imagine how severe his penalty had he bet "against" his own team rather than "for" it.
Yet, in the case of delcath, in light of all we've observed, it's fairly logical to assume that our team manager (ceo) is indeed betting against her own team.
If not, she'd have resigned by now or would have been a whistle-blower....but, alas....
that requires character and cojones.
It was "your" analogy.
.
Yes, your scenario is the only way to play bullish.
Congrats; you're in good shape.
.
No-one's Bullish here. Desperately "hoping" for a run or temporary spike, perhaps -
but that's far from being Bullish.
.
As expected, 10-Q = NonEvent.
You don't know from 10Q that dilution's Not coming.
It's Not fake news that trials have been cancelled (that's easily verifiable) but doesn't mean that trials won't continue elsewhere in U.S. (perhaps Duke) They may continue under delcath or they may not.
10Q's are often misleading and full of fluff to distract you from the bigger picture.
.
SNS, you keep referring to "incompetent" investors and now you're comparing retail investors' "competence" to the CEO's "competence".
You said the investors were Less competent than the CEO.
That's nonsense.
Investors are responsible for their own actions and are Not accountable to anyone else.
The CEO bears the responsibility of being accountable to the company as well as All investors.
This does not mean that she owes all investors a return on their investment, but it does mean that she and her board should be available, transparent and dutiful.
They've squandered funds and they're completely off the grid and unavailable to current, former and prospective investors. Empty offices and non existent IR.
Good point! True. Not everyone in Any high-scam country are shysters. Altho U.S. Is on the list, I'll choose India or Pakistan (also on the top 9) because U.S. is at least traceable and
others are Not.
Yeah, I think he'd choose India or Pakistan..lol
Oh sure. Give us your Nigerian bank account and we'll each wire you
$5K immediately.
SNS, so you're saying that the only "smart" investors are the hedge funds who abuse the pps and the retail investors who have money to "donate"? Where would the company be without your so-called "not-so-smart" investors?
You excuse away all bad behavior like a political apologist with no regard as to what responsibilities a public company has to its shareholders.
They don't owe shareholders a fortune or even promise of any return, but they certainly owe shareholders the fiduciary duty of their whereabouts, an occasional generic response to inquiries, etc.
You're very transparent with your narrative and your excuses for their bad behavior.
You don't know that they're Not being investigated; these things take time even when "timely".
Until then, we can only
play the game or
watch from the sidelines.
.
2 words - Patrick Byrne
Oh yes, they're doing a great job as always. They "think" they're Teflon but they're not.
I'm back in with free money just to keep them on radar but whether I'm in or Out, I'm on them like white on rice.
.
TTS, it just seems to me that people too often only "care" about what's important when it affects them "personally" or temporarily appeals to their "emotions".
There's a bigger picture and I'm willing to take a gain or a Loss in life for the greater good of All.
Just the way I was raised and I fail to see how it can be a Bad thing.
.
Evidently we're all rookie baggers w/dcth.
I only care about the fraud and over-manipulation at this point.
Position or No position, this is an outrage and everyone should care... Whether you're in or out... because it affects you in every aspect of the market.
Play it, swing it, hold it, stay on the sidelines...
But Take Action.
Nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea.
Take some pepto bismol :)
.
I'm not broke, but whether I was or not, any money I've lost in any stock is ultimately my own fault.
That being said, this does not excuse any company or any CEO from participating in fraud directly nor indirectly.
Even if this pps went to $215.45 in the next half hour, I'd not stop reporting the fraudulent activities and the negligence of fiduciary duty I've
experienced here.
It does Not matter how it affects ME personally nor any other retail investor "personally";
What matters is whether or not they've engaged in criminal activity...and that's regardless of whether I or anyone else profits or loses in their position(s) here.
Welcome back to the circus.
From the looks of things, Yes, indeed she should.
Looks are often deceiving, but it's difficult to see any other logical alternative.
Agree 100%. This is a responsibility that she wholeheartedly accepted.
She (as are all CEOs) is also responsible for understanding how to detect unusually suspicious trading activity
(ie: naked-shorting) and reporting it herself.
That responsibility should not fall upon retail shareholders alone.
She can Cook? Lol.
Her time is near?
All depends on what "is" is.
(She points, shakes her long finger of indignation at the screen and declares...)
"I did NOT * have * SECshull relations * with that woman; these allegations against me are false!!"
Seems like a false sense of security to rely upon naked-shorts to cover when they
do Not have any dependable oversight to "ensure" that they cover. They're naked, they're invisible, they're untraceable for the most part, and they're rampant.