Changing Daily
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What do you "want" the press release to say? If the co does not feel it necessary to submit a PR, wouldn't you think either something is brewing, or there is nothing to post? We all know a merger is imminent, and as of now, no publicly announced CEO, so I would think we can all do the math. What if they are merging with the company that gave them the contract? That would More or less double the contract price and profit. (That's my guess) So do you want a PR rushed to provide the insecure with security, or to provide the secure with some potentially life changing news?
I also don't believe that is entirely true if they were sec reporting. Does Apple let its shareholders know every time they sell a product or fill an order?
Why would Michael Ogburn be required to do anything if he is no longer the CEO? Why would IBRC be required to file anything with the SEC if IBRC is not sec reporting?
You could be right. I thought 90 days. Anybody else know?
Again, if it was complete, we would not know that it was done until Q1 Quarterly filing due in June. I have not been around quite as long as you, but got in at .0001, so playing with house money. GLTY
We can all do both, I get that. I just laugh at people that say they are going to dump if a PR does not come out by a CEO that isn't there anymore. A few weeks ago the same words were being used, IBRC puts out a PR and everyone was pissed because it didn't say anything. If the former CEO really was in it for himself, he would have reversed this long ago and because he holds so many shares, I'm confident he is not going to do anything to jeopardize his value. Long IBRC!
I see everyone is expecting a PR. Curious what is expected in that PR? I personally thought it was for info on the merger, but see most are still focused on the $13m deal (even though GOLD called and confirmed) and if MO (who does not work there) keeps his word and the use of the phrase "next week". This board this week has truly defined the difference between Investors and Traders.
This needs eyeballs!
I believe a few Tribes signed a deal with them and now distribute through IBRC?
Imagine where it would be if people quit bashing the stock!
Heck, I'm waiting for evidence of ANY of his claims!
So you're saying any PR is fraud or worthless until a proper filing; so if it's fraudulent, why would any company waste any money on silly PR's or Twitter?
So curious; if IBRC closed the deal, why are we still talking about "if" Chief Bills and John were or weren't adopted into the Indian tribe???
How you feel in' about the former CEO now?
See; they even had an hour to spare!
Escrow is now necessarily with a bank. I would imagine its with an attorney like with an mj transaction.
In my opinion, regardless of how small the amount, it's still a schedule 1. I don't know much about cbd, but lots about MJ and would classify this as the same. If mj is legal in CA and Penn, how do you get it there? Even if you have a license to transport, you would have to cross state lines. The way I understand the DEA license, it has to go from tribe to tribe. If this didn't start on a tribe and end up on one, that license could not be used.
1,000 kilo orders?
I think it was because the law was passed after the order. At least that's how I read it.
I never thought about the banks not accepting the payment because it was a schedule 1.......
Talking bad about Ben huh?
Promoted?
Is the last company the one that he took from $.0001 up 2,500% to $.0025 in a year? Is that the one you're referring to?
The CEO has several billion shares of IBRC. So you're saying he took the $13m deal for himself? So outside of ethics/ SEC, he takes a $13m order that say would profit 25%, so say $3m. His shares today are worth $10m+ not counting what the shares would be worth on a completed deal. Think about the details.....
I think something to keep in mind; this whole thing has to be a positive for IBRC. MO owns 5b IBRC shares and allegedly cancelled 4.5b leaving 500m worth $1m. He owns 1m AHIT worth 750k+-. Why would he walk away from one to another if he wasn't taken care of? Why cancel 4.5b shares if he was just going to let the co go? He could have kept the shares that would be worth $10m (at Fri closing) and continued along and once the cbd deal closed, sit back and own who knows how much $. Instead takes another position at an obviously connected company for $750k? My opinion-
Can you copy and post where Ogburn said that? I'm curious.
I'm referring to vetting of someone becoming CEO of a QB. By vetting I mean that they haven't been dumping their old companies stock.
This kind of squashes the "pump and dump" theory by the CEO as any new officer in a QB company would have to be approved by the SEC.
The CEO retiring shares technically should raise the price. I can't think of a circumstance that would ever be beneficial to keep the price low.
He's been waiting with all his eggs in the NC basket waiting and waiting and waiting for permits. All the while Kentucky, Nevada, Oregon and others have issued permits and are now the biggest producers in the nation. But fingers crossed on NC.
So after years and $millions, Bruce is getting a new machine because he can't get the old to work?
I never thought of that but very true. The guys are determined to make this stock relevant!
It looks as if they changed domicile states;
https://wyobiz.wy.gov/business/FilingDetails.aspx?eFNum=000183248062198141250036032058119149207194241248
"med" my bad.
What "Ned" did they sell off?
I don't think there is any indication from the company that there is anything between CBIS and IBRC.
You actually do not need any blood to be a member. A non member can even move onto tribal land, not be member and take advantage of tribal tax exemptions. Has to do with blood, but not required. You would have to work out the details of the land owner (tribe) to be allowed on the land. Once living on the land, each person (infant has same rights of adult) gets an equal share of tribe revenue, so the non member would have to provide revenue for entire tribe. That's how casinos get built; outside money. I don't time to get into further detail as I would be here all day poking holes in Ben "Short" Lurkins knowledge, but it is funny that this page is about IBRC and all Ben can write about is if the ones giving the contract committed a crime 20 years ago.
I have a gut feeling something will happen here in the next couple of weeks.
From what I understand there are over 50 pods on back order.... at $50-100k a pop..... not bad. I can't imagine that a guy that hand makes $2m cars would put out an inferior product.
So you're calling DiMora a failure?