Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BRWC just finished inking a new toxic debt deal. What are you talking about?
Drmo always gives us a heads up when things are coming. I think he strategically released the news in different outlets at different times to give longs an opportunity to see the news and load up before the masses, and he did it legally. I think we'll see a lot of action and movement today, and we'll be thanking mo for taking care of us.
The only thing this ticker has had going for it for months is NO TOXIC DEBT, BRWC IS H2O GOLD...LOL...I'M NOT WORRIED, CEO #1
Now, there is toxic convertible debt. If there is a bump tomorrow, take my advice and sell.
I have no position, short or long, and no plan to obtain one.
Nice 8k?
The only thing nice about this 8k is that James can no longer scream that there is no convertible or toxic debt anymore.
No 8k on a deal, still. No quarterly report, still. If half of the deals that have been pr'd were in place, there would be no need for warrants.
This will just allow more money to be funneled to St Elie, while the Boreal shareholders pay the bill.
Thanks for the update and the reply. I didn't realize this was a reply to an email you sent. I thought there might be an IR link or email signup page somewhere. I won't send emails asking for updates, but if there was somewhere to sign up, I would. Again, thanks for the info.
How do we get on the update email list?
Are you saying that if we see any of these MMs on L2, that means there is dilution, but if they're not there, it means no dilution?
Doesn't matter who gets paid twice a week. The definition of the word is the definition of the word. Look it up for yourself.
I find it absolutely hilarious that people on this board want to insult people's intelligence when they are in fact the one who is wrong.
I'm ignorant because I realize that a word can have more than one definition? Maybe I should define the word ignorant for you as well.
Did you remember to take your lithium today? Your bipolar is showing a little.
Biweekly can actually refer to every other week or twice a week.
How many deals have you seen a pr for? How many of those deals have you seen an 8k for? How many of those deals have you seen reflected in financials?
Answer those questions and then tell me how this fluff is different than the previous fluff.
The last sell was for 1000 shares. Less than a $5 trade. That's just someone trying to manipulate the price IMO.
Grants aren't just handed out. It takes a lot of effort to put one together. In the academic world, we sometimes take a month or more to prepare one. Why take this time to prepare a grant, when you could have put the same effort into forging a partnership or deal that will easily net more money and is potentially ongoing.
The deal is between the shareholders and the new carrot Francine is dangling.
Or maybe she let him go for the reason she reported to the SEC. He wanted to include statements in the quarterly reports that he disagreed with what the company was reporting.
That wasn't bad news? Good to hear. Your #1 CEO said there would be news, some good and some bad.
So by your logic everyone should sell since the bad news is still on the way?
You mean we got the good news. IMO an honest auditor was fired so that nothing bad was uncovered, which would have resulted in a fall in pps.
Wonder what the bad news will be.
Where is James with his #1 CEO and #1 auditor now?
Two auditors banned by the SEC, then one fired because he said he would have to file with statements that he disagreed with certain points.
Francine has an MBA, she should know what her books look like. There is a conflict of interest having a public and private company across borders owned by the same person.
This is my opinion, but when sales and deals that have been talked about fail to show up anywhere in financials, it makes me think that she is funneling profits to St Elie and letting the shareholders eat the cost in Boreal.
I stayed in this longer than I was planning because of a conversation I had with shorts. I am now completely out, but managed to barely stay in the green. No matter what is released from now on, I don't trust it. Two shady auditors were hired purposefully in my opinion. When one comes along who actually does his job, he gets fired.
Or funneled to St. Elie.
I honestly don't care about your mood. You come on here and resort to name calling and personal attacks. You base arguments on logical fallacies. You disregard someone's opinion because they aren't Greenspan, but somehow think your "opinion" means something.
Grow up.
By your own logic then, you're opinion means nothing as well and should be ignored. Please refrain from posting anything else.
You're excited because someone painted 2's with a twenty cent buy?
Where is the merger? Where is the news? Where is the CEO?
$615 traded today total. Get excited!!!!
The news is actually pretty good. Everyone is focusing on the $160K and $4M number. I think something that has been overlooked is that the minimum required purchase to maintain exclusivity is $4M.
Do you buy a car without kicking the tires first? Probably not. That seems to be what's going on here. An agreement is in place. The first run has been purchased and WHEN it lives up to what was promised, more orders will be placed.
My guess is that this will ultimately bring in much more than the minimum $4M.
From the figures it looked to be about a mining operation. Completely unrelated and dc should be banned from posting for such an outrageous lie.
It's a damn shame more investors and hub members aren't like you. I'm glad to be in on this play with you and think patience will pay off. I do understand others' frustration, and admit that I've had doubts as well. I've feel I actually got something out of our exchange this morning. The fact that you responded intelligently without vitriol to concerns....I think you should be the CEO.
Shortnlongs for CEO!!
I agree with you almost completely. Consider if you bought the day old bread with the baker's promise that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between it and a fresh loaf.
I think we will be fine once news is released, but I am near trimming my position here.
Since we are nearing Halloween, I'll use a topical analogy to describe what I believe to be a reasonable motivation for your observations.
Let's say you go online and search for local haunted houses. You find one that you're interested in and read all of the online reviews. You find one on main street that all the yelp users say is the scariest and best one. You decide you want to check it out.
When you get there you have to buy a ticket at a window and then go stand in line to actually go into the haunted house. You didn't get here as early as you had hoped and you're a little ways back in the line. It begins to move a little, but you're still nowhere near getting in when someone comes out and says that "wow it's really scary in here and it's awesome, but we're closing for the evening"
You think, no big deal, I'll just get a refund and check out another haunted house. You go back to the ticket window and you're told that you'll have to pay a convenience fee that is a large percentage of the original ticket price if you want a refund. BUT, you can come back tomorrow and your ticket will still be good.
You think, ok I'll come back tomorrow.
The next day you arrive and get in line only to be told after standing for a few hours that you'll in fact need to come back tomorrow because maintenance is being done today. You do this over and over for a week. You've bought your ticket and you've wasted a ton of time. At this point do you cut your losses? Well no, you waited over a week and Halloween is over and all of the other haunted houses are closing down for the year. The one you hold your ticket to is still telling you, "soon we'll let you in to see all those great things you read about online"
You see an employee and ask him/her if you can speak to the manager. They simply ignore you and walk away. The other people in the line see this and realize what a crappy situation you and they are both in and begin to tell you how awesome the reviews were that they read and how awesome it's going to be once you're all inside.
It's at this point you realize that you're stuck and you die a little inside. In fact, if you could take how you're feeling and personify it, it might be the scariest thing that you could see in a haunted house.
At this point, your inner child presents itself and you throw a temper tantrum so that all those still in line see it, and you hope that anyone else who may be thinking about purchasing a ticket will refrain until management takes notice and actually comes through on the things you were promised.
Here's the deal: The DD suggests that this could make us a lot of money. Unfortunately, it would seem that the CEO goes out of her way to over promise and under deliver. I've been expecting financials next week for months now. She knew why they were late months ago. Did she say we're working on things or there are issues? NO....she said they'll be out next week.....they'll be out soon. All while knowing what was going on with their auditor. That is flat out dishonest. We're now seeing the same pattern with these big deals. They are coming next week...they are coming soon.
Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. I'm not certain any more. I haven't lost faith that the company can be profitable and successful, but I am quickly losing faith in the CEO.
This is all just my opinion, but I understand why people are upset and they are simply doing everything they can to pressure the CEO to simply do what she has stated she would in the timeframe she has promised. If she can't comply with her timeline, simply post an update and not some picture of her from 3 years ago.
GLTA here.
The tl;dr version is this:
Both companies have the same end target but different starting materials.
Both are isocyanate free. It would be naive to think that the larger companies wouldn't begin producing greener products, but the market is huge and HCTI will find a place with ease.
I'm a member of the American Chemical Society (ACS) and they sent me a white paper (topical brochure essentially) in September. It was called "How Industrial Applications in Green Chemistry Are Changing Our World" The entire 20 or so pages focused on the Presidential EPA Award winners. Because of the publication date, this year's winners were not included, and therefore, HCTI was not mentioned. What I found interesting though was how much emphasis and importance people in my field were placing on these awards specifically and the green chemistry direction.
This is going to be great, it's just a matter of timing.
I wrote a reply that I realized was more technical than I anticipated. I started over and will attempt an explanation that glosses over many of the finer details, but hopefully will give you enough information. If not, feel free to reply here or message me. I will attempt to clarify and am also open to discussing this over the phone or skype.
With polyurethane you can think of two blocks repeating over and over, or as a block unit that is bridged by a linker.
Polyurethane typically has a block that can be modified linked by a functional group called a carbamate. The synthesis of the carbamate linker is where isocyanates have been heavily relied upon. A relatively simple reaction transforms the isocyanate into the carbamate while linking the two pieces together. If you have isocyanates on both sides of the one block, it is easy to imagine a chain (polymer) forming.
HCTI has realized a way to form these carbamate functionalities or a molecule that is one atom off using a different reactive starting material. (I say perhaps one atom off, because the starting materials and methods described could yield two products at a glance and with the nature of this, the exact chemical structure is not provided to protect intellectual property) Their process appears to be photoinduced which means the reaction is initiated by light. Previous work has required an additional chemical component to be added to start the reaction.
Dow appears to start with a carbamate polymer or many of the blocks previously mentioned linked together without the bridge, and then they insert the bridges.
At the end of the day, the carbamate functional group is not a terribly complex molecule. There are several ways that one could imagine getting to the ultimate product. An analogy here could be 5 different families that live in different places all decide to shop at the same store. They start in different places and take different routes, but ultimately have the same goal and end up in the same place.
This does not speak to the cost, scalability, or feasibility of a particular synthetic route, but just aims to show that there are multiple ways to accomplish the same thing.
In briefly looking over methods since investing here I have come across a few different routes. Some are more clever than others. I think HCTI has checked a few boxes in their pursuits. First, the obvious, there are no isocyanates. Second, the materials are solids and prevent the use of volatile solvents. If you've ever used paint thinner you know how terrible they can be. I should mention that obtaining a homogeneous mixture is necessary to ensure that everything reacts and solvents promote that. I'm sure HCTI has looked at and most likely solved a way to properly mix the solids. Last, they are using plant based materials. These may be synthesized in a lab or they may be collected from plant material and processed. I'm not sure, but when you can show that a material can be collected in this manner, people believe that it is inherently good.
I realize that this is a wall of text. I hope it has been somewhat informational. Again, if anyone would like clarification on anything, just let me know.
No. The chemistry is completely different. Dow is developing this independent of hcti based on the methods both companies describe in public releases and patents.
This is at no bid. All that volume and no bid? What's your "theory" about that if things are so great here?
The MMs absorbed them and now they've stopped buying. No one else here is buying. Then again, maybe those shares went to the same place as your pps.
37 million shares were traded today. Only 7.6 million of those were buys. That means roughly 30 million were dumped.
I believe this as well. Others are misquoting him though and make it seem as though he does.
So "right" out of the gate the company is already valued at $100M?
If not, then perhaps when you quote someone you shouldn't add out drop words.
That's my only point here. This company may realize $100M but it's not there yet. It's dishonest to imply that it is by misquoting the ceo.
Toast to $100M company out of the gate running.
Adding the word "right" as you do implies that the company is currently valued much higher than it is. You then add what the pps would be if that were the valuation. Again this implies that this should be realized with no effort. That's dishonest.
Notice he doesn't imply that the company is already valued at $100M. He gives what I believe is a goal and then states that the company is on its way.
I don't understand your need to deceive when the truth is just as nice.
This is exactly what I was talking about in a previous post. You purposefully reworded and misquoted the tweet you link to and present it as fact.
Can we add a few stickys from bashers?
What they say is no less true or honest than what you've posted.
If I recall there was a pretty extensive post recently where the convertibles were discussed and the poster showed that everything from the financials should have been complete after the first week of dumping. Yet it continues.
The aggression to tell myself and others to sell and get off the board is funny. Your ire is misplaced. You're upset at the pps and the direction that this is heading just like the rest of us. This is looking worse and worse. The company expected the deal to be done by the end of last month. They have 4 days to release news such as that. The self imposed deadline has been missed by weeks so far, without so much as a whisper. If you want to be mad, be mad at management.
It doesn't take a lot of ability to see that the company is allowing massive dilution. There was a lot of momentum without news. That momentum has absolutely been crushed over the past couple of weeks. Can you give any reason other than company dilution that would cause a roughly 60% drop over the mentioned time period?
Notice also how silent many "longs" and "cheerleaders" have suddenly become.
With a deal supposedly in place with a F500 company and all R&D more or less complete, what need is there to dump shares in the manner that they have been?
If you say MM manipulation or blame it on anything other than management, perhaps you should question your own abilities to decipher BS.
I think this still has potential, but I am quickly losing faith when watching how management has failed to handle this situation.
Others have already called. When they spoke to Gary Grim, he laughed at the $11 million dollar revenue stated in the release. I think I trust the word of the man who has been running this business since the 90's more than yours.
Next, where exactly have you found audited financials for The Preowned Jeep Store? You use them as evidence, but I can't find them anywhere. Care to share a link?
I would also like to ask how long in your experience does it take the market to realize an undervalued company and correct itself. I understand that it can take time when there are complicated mechanisms at work. When everything is as simple and transparent as you suggest, how can you justify the volume and price being stagnant for weeks?