Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
check out news
"because discussions between the parties may obviate the need for a response". Could be interpreting incorrectly but seems there may be settlement discussions.
Can admin pin this post?
2 different things, read again
you really don't understand my point, I have a huge position and will be selling at .02. 100x from here. Are you using auto translate by chance?
I'll sell my position that is 1000x your trade at .02.
Other things might but this portion won't drag out imo
New proposed subpoenas by SEC vs Ironridge: https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2017/ap-4569.pdf
This applies to local voice in HK which I believe was a small portion of biz. CMM is a data and international voice company. Btw there are apparently finalizing a merger with a US based MNO.
Waiting for you to buy those 65-70mm shares.
Could be a further catalyst
I see Vela rally similar to $ERFB. She and other promoters are now promoting that stock.
Hearing .002 by spring...at least
Right now you can buy at .0002. The only way to buy at .0001 (bid) is if someone else is willing to sell there.
Merger may not happen but ignoring news posted on cmm website?
Absolutely
Finalizing merger with a US based MNO. Please understand difference between MVNO and MNO
There are an international voice and data company, suspension relates only to local HK market. Insignificant imo
would VELA rally if CMM were finalizing a merger with a US based mobile network operator?
If you buy ~68.75mm to get to 100mm, the 2s will be cleaned up shortly after that
Huge day today, up 100%
CM Mobile has deals with China Unicom, China Mobile and NTT. Pretty clear on website imo
Thank you
When did CEO make that statement?
How many shares did you buy in advance of your post?
K_Dog, I could care less, but if you read your posts from September, I don't believe you. Anyone believe K_Dog?
Ah yes, the imaginary trades on or before September 13th
I think he means the stock price
Plus 4-5 posts him regretting selling his 60mm. Now he claims he sold at .0004, yeah OK.
you said you sold your last million on 9/13/2016 which was before the runup
Are you sure that it wasn't .0002
No idea, was asking Blake what the good news was and for me revenue ramp would be the only thing I consider as good news.
As an example, someone deleted a post when I referenced link below which shows what Vela can do to avoid to filing:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=73511165&adw=1126416
I did say to check the run of this stock but point was to show what Vela can do which has come up a few time from others.
blake2897/trackkwizzard, Stellar revenue ramp possibly happening ?
Would be surprised if appellate sides with VHC
Don't take this the wrong way but you are spending a lot of time here for a couple of million shares
Supreme Court would be to rule on the constitutionality of how ALJs are appointed which affects hundreds of cases (perhaps thousands) one of which is Ironridge which affects all their "partners" like Vela.
Personally I think VFIN is a short, even Ironridge isn't that stupid to get and then sell shares like this during ALJ proceedings. Also, VFIN actions past a couple of weeks smells like a short trying to make book look good at year end. Also, their has been plenty of volume at ask so would not be surprised if they are covering as well and perhaps not really shorting more. Their mere presence causes panic. Their actions should be reported by everyone to SEC.
The latest ruling against SEC does not affect the current Ironridge proceedings. 3-4 circuits have ruled in the SECs favor, including the circuit applicable to Ironridge. The 10th is the first one and SEC may request an en banc (I think that Is what it is called ) where all circuit judges would have to vote since ruling was 2-1. The only way this affects Ironridge is if this goes to the Supreme Court and ALJ is ruled unconstitutional which I believe they have been reluctant to take on these cases in the past.