Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You, an asset?
Your picks are lousy, IFTA, NPCT. If someone wanted to make money, they should just short everything you recommend.
You also attack everyone on a personal level besides just being plain obnoxious.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
That's easy, excel
It is my personal opinion that since joemoney has sooooooo many aliases on RB which he even admits, he probably has a few here also, namely as many user names as he has member marks
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Joe, how come you have a lower ranking than me here?
Why is that? Please explain
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I was being sarcastic
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
When the cat's away...
the posters will play
Have a good time. I'll be good. I swear
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
If you LIE in positive or negative direction,
then you can be sued. If you post a fake SEC or PR document and it dumps or shoots, you can be sued. If you post honest things, you can't be sued. I mean, you can be sued for the heck of it, but you wouldn't be in the wrong. If you post misleading things such as "I know a guy on the inside and he says the next report will show $10M in profits.." that would be misleading. If you say you know they have a deal with IBM that will be announced soon and it's not true, that's also misleading. If you post these things and you're profiting or being paid to post these things, you must disclaim it.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
No, you can't Joe
If you post honest items like insidetruth, then the share price falls, you've done nothing illegal. If you profit from the fall, you still have done nothing illegal. You need to bone up on the law.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
If you get sued for message board posts
you will want a motion to quash so the message board will not turn over your IP and sign up information to the person suing. If they don't have a name, they can't sue you. Case over.
Just two weeks ago there was a precedence setting case which basically means that all chat room and message board talk is only personal opinions. You cannot be sued for expressing your personal opinion. It is protected under freedom of speech.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Anyone need a quash?
Let me know. I have a ton over here that can be used as guidelines. I am not an attorney nor am I giving legal advice. If you would like legal advice, please consult with your attorney. To find some quashes on your own, search http://www.google.com for quash I have some personal ones that are up to date with current message board related case rulings. Need more information on message board lawsuits, check out http://www.johndoes.org
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
eVWAP is officially dead
Someone else has beat them out.
.02 per trade, no minimum size and sessions every half an hour.
http://www.interactivebrokers.com/
VWAP
To assist customers in reducing execution risk, IB supports VWAP orders for large cap stocks. The VWAP for a stock is calculated by adding the dollars traded for every transaction in that stock ("price" x "number of shares traded") and dividing the total shares traded.
A VWAP is computed for time cutoffs every half hour from market open to 3:00 pm (New York Time), and is calculated by volume weighting all transactions from the time cutoff to the market close. As an example, a VWAP as of 10:30 am would volume weight all transactions for a stock from 10:30 am to market close.
Orders may be entered only for the nearest VWAP cutoff time and must be entered three minutes before the cutoff time. All IB VWAP prices will be computed by Bloomberg, displayed by IB after market close, and are guaranteed to be executed.
thanks to the person who sent me the info
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Nanopierce struggles to find funding, go to market
11/30/2001 6:43:00 PM
By Tony Monterastelli
Business these days can be tough for a small private company searching for capital to fund the development of a new technology. But it can be even tougher for a public company.
Consider Nanopierce Technologies, which began life in Denver as a public company in 1998. Since then, Chief Executive Officer Paul Metzinger has pounded the pavement in search of public equity investments for the small technology development firm, which offers a new method for attaching silicon wafer chips to circuitry in electronics applications.
Meanwhile, the company’s stock price has flagged this year. On Nov. 16, Nanopierce’s stock price closed at 80 cents per share on the National Association of Securities Dealers’ over-the-counter bulletin board, far below the $9 trading price the company had hoped to reach by the end of 2001. At the same time, a handful of small private Colorado companies continue to buck the recession by landing financing deals with venture capitalists, including such companies as LeftHand Networks, IQ Navigator, Anark and Aegis Analytical.
Looking back, should Metzinger have gone the private route instead?
“I don’t think so,” he said during an interview at Nanopierce’s offices in downtown Denver.
Nanopierce’s technology was too new, too developmental, to draw interest from venture capitalists and angel investors, he said.
“We’re not in their ballpark. They want companies that are right on the edge of revenue. They rarely get behind developmental companies,” he said. “One thing we did, though, we underestimated how much time it would take to develop this (technology). I take full responsibility for that.”
A former securities lawyer, Metzinger shifted his career in the 1990s to try his hand at entrepreneurship.
In 1996, he held a controlling interest in Sunlight Systems, a Denver-based public company that offered skylights for houses. In 1998, Metzinger converted Sunlight Systems into Nanopierce, shortly after acquiring the patents for the chip attachment method, which is known as the Nanopierce Connection System.
The NCS can bind silicon chips to circuit boards using a proprietary “glue” made of magnetic particles, said Herbert Neuhaus, Nanopierce vice president and research director.
“It eliminates the need for wire bonding (between the chip and the circuitry). If you can eliminate steps, then you’ve saved the money and you’ve presumably increased the throughput,” said Neuhaus, who manages the company’s small development facility in Colorado Springs, where it plans to open a new clean room in December. The current facility has 11 employees.
But Metzinger says time is short for Nanopierce. The company had a loss of $996,320 for the third quarter of 2001 on revenue of just $24,066, which came from software development contracts held by a subsidiary, Nanocard Technologies, which is based in Frankfurt, Germany.
Although the company has raised a total of $12.5 million in public equity financings, its most recent financing event was in October 2000. Today, Nanopierce has a burn rate of $200,000 per month. The company has just enough money to support its operations until the end of the current fiscal year in July 2002, Metzinger said.
Metzinger is meeting with bankers and institutional investors in New York City and elsewhere in what could be his last chance to keep Nanopierce afloat as a public company.
With a stock price below $1, a small bulletin board company such as Nano-pierce can find itself at the end of the line at the investment trough, said Alan Talesnick, an attorney specializing in securities law at Patton Boggs in Denver.
“It’s hard to raise lots of money that way. (The investment banks and institutional investors) have the bargaining power, and they are not going to pay above market price,” Talesnick said. “The terms are pretty tough.”
But business always has been tough for Nanopierce. Like many small, public, technology-based companies, Nano-pierce tends to spend as much time in litigation as it does in promoting its technology to investors.
Since the beginning, Metzinger has been involved in a contract dispute with Louis DiFrancesco, an engineer and the original holder of the patents for the technology now known as NCS. The case is in the Colorado Court of Appeals.
In August, eight Nanopierce shareholders sued Toronto-based broker dealer Thomson Kernaghan in Colorado District Court. The suit was about the sale of $7.5 million in Nanopierce stock to Harvest Court LLC, an entity registered in the Cayman Islands, in October 2000.
The plaintiffs allege that Harvest Court was a front for Kernaghan that later attempted to gain control of Nanopierce by selling many of the shares in an effort to drive the price down. Under the sale agreement, Har-vest Court stood to gain additional shares if Nano-pierce’s stock price dropped below a specified amount.
The company also had a setback when one of its stock promoters be-came the target of an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In early 2000, Nanopierce — which also trades its stock on the Ham-burg, Germany, ex-change — paid a German stock promoter, World of Internet, to produce reports about Nanopierce for its Web site, Stockreporter.de.
The SEC sued World of Internet for failing to disclose on its Web site that it had received compensation from Nano-pierce and dozens of other companies to publish the reports. U.S. securities laws require the publishers of stock reports to let the public know when they have been paid by a company to publish the reports. A federal judge shut down the site and ordered World of Internet’s owners to pay fines to the government.
Paid stock promotion is often a necessity for a small technology development company, Metzinger said.
“It’s critical for us because you’ve got to get your story out to the widest possible audience. You get your story to the public and hope — based on a real market opportunity — to generate enthusiasm,” he said. “(World of Internet) came highly referenced. I was truly impressed with their operation.”
While Nanopierce still has money to spend, the company will continue to promote its chip connection method, Metzinger said.
Neuhaus, a Ph.D. graduate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said Nanopierce’s technology has gotten a rave reception from other engineers in the microchip industry.
“There’s the sale to the engineering staff. That’s an easy one. They usually slap the palms of their hand on their foreheads and say ‘why didn’t I think of that?’ But then you have to sell to the business people. And there, nobody wants to stick their neck out too far on a new thing,” he said.
http://www.frtechbiz.com/displayarticledetail.asp?art_id=52586
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
you are free to clear it up yourself, joe
you have a profile on npct in your website. Why? Why do you have that huge disclaimer in your website? It says you could be making money off your picks.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
~*~*~UNPAID DD ON NPCT~*~*~
updated.
1. The CEO was sued for fraud by the SEC twice (see below for lawsuit dockets)
2. The CEO was also sued for racketeering and was involved in a lawsuit over missing stock certificates.
3.The CEO's last company went bankrupt, i.e. a division of Intercell. There may be more.
4. NPCT was started as a mining company then became a distributor of skylights symbol SUNY and now sells hitech? The assets of npct i.e. patents and patent applications were bought with printed shares from a division of Intercell. Intercell considered their value ZERO. CEO Paul Metzinger is also the CEO of Intercell. symbol IICP.OB http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IICP.OB&d=t As of 9/25 their stock is at .14
5. No direct revenue, no profits. They had a tiny tiny bit of income for consulting about something which had nothing to do with the company.
6. They have hired many, many stock promoters. One of them posted on the message boards that toxic funding is good and the funder was a good company when that was not the case. The company is currently suing the funder for stock manipulation and securities fraud.
7. They have an Open House every year which is basically just a stock promotion meeting. Here is a photo from it. They promote it heavily in Asia, Germany and the US yet they only had 35 people and I see at least five stock promoters in the audience. If this were a revolutionary product, how come more people weren't there? Why'd they even take a photo of such a small audience? http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/company/openhoeuse_event/oh_images/
Audience/Thumbnails/TN_the_audience1.jpg
8. Most of the DD on this company is paid promotion such as wallstreetreporter.com , investortoinvestor.com , Investor Relations Worldwide Corporation asianinvestoronline.com , Hal Engle owner of WillyWizard.com , marketreporter.com , ceocast.com, nanotechinvesting.com is company site, stockreporter.de, Charles Van Musscher of Gruenwald, Germany, The Geneva Group, Inc. of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida and probably others. Check out their disclaimers on their sites. They have been paid to promote NPCT.
9. Paul Metzinger is also CEO of Intercell. They did a 1:20 reverse stock split and their stock is at .14 That means it is really worth less than a cent. He changed the stock symbol also. He wasn't even in any type of business. His words again "I am currently assessing with the Board of Directors various business opportunities, which could well form the basis for the future business activity of the Company. There are several opportunities which we find of particular interest and which are in markets of substantial size upon which to build a real operating company. We have no specific restrictions imposed upon our search. I invite any shareholder who may be aware of a technology or a business opportunity, which they think may be of interest to the Company, to please contact me."
10. Intercell also had problems with the SEC with their reports. They had to restate them. This straight from the CEO. "Our previously announced plan to restructure, recapitialize and refinance Intercell Corporation was, unfortunately, delayed because of a frustratingly long effort to accommodate the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission on certain technical accounting issues relating to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999."
11. The CEO begs shareholders not to verify contracts with other companies. This is very troubling and suspect.
http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/investor/press_archive/shletter14_09_01.html
"We are currently engaged in extremely sensitive discussions with many major global players in the microelectronics industry. These discussions and future business relationships can and will be jeopardized if shareholders make direct contacts with any of these companies in what may be a well intentioned effort to find out what is going on.
Recently executives of one company, at the highest levels, contacted us expressing extreme and troubling concern about calls received from inquisitive shareholders. These executives felt "compromised” being faced with answering questions about what they deemed to be inside material information, which obviously they could not disclose or even affirm or deny. These contacts must stop otherwise we may lose the opportunity to ever again deal with these companies. It destroys our reputation to be a trustworthy partner."
12. NPCT stock promoter Stockreporter sued by the SEC for fraud in his promotions. Here is the npct stock promotion. http://www.mary.cc/npct/sp.htm Here is the SEC lawsuit against the Stockreporter. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16680.htm
13. Here Metzinger claims there are huge oil reserves for a company when there weren't. http://www.mary.cc/npct/1.htm
Here are lawsuit dockets
105 METZINGER, PAUL codc 1:1989cv00227 02/08/1989 850 02/23/1989
SECURITIES & EXCHANG vs. PAUL METZINGER
U.S
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Does Noel know who Paul really is?
Also note from the article that Noel is a dreamer also
"And as for the penny tag, Guillory admits to a certain skepticism. "You hear all this talk about it," he says. "But it's never been delivered." "
so paul and noel have something in common. They promise then don't deliver. If the technology is so great, why didn't motorola buy it.
http://www.techreview.com/magazine/mar01/schmidt.asp
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
.08 new all time low
not today, when I was gone, out of town. I'm amazed it didn't sink futher after dipping below .10
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Matt, I'm just glad you didn't want a La Forza
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
This is what SEC emailed
You obviously don't know what you're doing. I beleive you intentionally sent yourself on a wild goose chase so you wouldn't have to dig up the correct information. You had no problem emailing the correct person at johndoes or ATG yet you don't know how to email the SEC?
"You may wish to submit a Freedom of
Information Act request to the attention of our SEC Operations Center,
FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, at Room 2208, Stop 0-5, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA. 22312, with respect to non-public documents at the
Commission.
You should contact the NASD concerning Security Violations for the years of
January 1, 1994 to the present at 1-800 289-9999.
The Commission's Computerized Data Base System of Records discloses that a
Civil Injunction was filed against a PAUL H. METZINGER in 1989.
The Commission's Records Management Branch does not maintain the records of
Civil Injunctions. You may obtain copies of these records by contacting the
U.S. District Court of Colorado, at 103 Sheppard Drive, No. 215, Durango
81301. You can also reach them at 970 247-1514 or by fax at 970 247-8619.
Also, our data base system discloses a Securities Violation against a Paul H
Metzinger, dated April 10, 1989.
Chief, Public Reference Branch
VAL/drm"
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
SEC forced CEO to restate books TWICE
in his last company Intercell. Does this sound like an ethical and honest CEO to you? Not to me.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
CEO of npct sued TWICE by SEC for FRAUD!!!!
Does this sound like an honest and ethical CEO? Not to me.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
SEC document vs paid stock promoter
I think I'd go with what the SEC document says.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
~*~*~UNPAID DUE DILIGENCE NPCT~*~*~
1. The CEO was sued for fraud by the SEC TWICE. (see below for lawsuit dockets)
2. The CEO was also sued for racketeering and was involved in a lawsuit over missing stock certificates.
3.The CEO's last company went bankrupt, i.e. Intercell. Other companies he was involved in went bankrupt also such as Faspaq. He also went bankrupt personally around 1989.
4. NPCT was started as a mining company then became a distributor of skylights symbol SUNY and now sells hitech? The assets of npct i.e. patents and patent applications were bought with printed shares from a division of Intercell. Intercell considered their value ZERO. CEO Paul Metzinger is also the CEO of Intercell. symbol IICP.OB http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IICP.OB&d=t As of 9/25 their stock is at .14
5. No direct revenue, no profits. They had a tiny tiny bit of income for consulting about something which had nothing to do with the company.
6. They have hired many, many stock promoters. One of them posted on the message boards that toxic funding is good and the funder was a good company when that was not the case. The company is currently suing the funder for stock manipulation and securities fraud.The funder Southridge Financial, Kernaghan are imfamous as corporate loan sharks who short stocks.
7. They have an Open House every year which is basically just a stock promotion meeting. Here is a photo from it. They promote it heavily in Asia, Germany and the US yet they only had 35 people and I see at least five stock promoters in the audience. If this were a revolutionary product, how come more people weren't there? Why'd they even take a photo of such a small audience? http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/company/openhoeuse_event/oh_images/
Audience/Thumbnails/TN_the_audience1.jpg
8. Most of the DD on this company is paid promotion such as wallstreetreporter.com , investortoinvestor.com , Investor Relations Worldwide Corporation asianinvestoronline.com , WillyWizard.com , marketreporter.com , ceocast.com, nanotechinvesting.com is company site, stockreporter.de, Charles Van Musscher of Gruenwald, Germany, The Geneva Group, Inc. of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida and probably others. Check out their disclaimers on their sites. They have been paid to promote NPCT.
9. Paul Metzinger is also CEO of Intercell. They did a 1:20 reverse stock split and their stock is at .14 That means it is really worth less than a cent. He changed the stock symbol also. He wasn't even in any type of business. His words again "I am currently assessing with the Board of Directors various business opportunities, which could well form the basis for the future business activity of the Company. There are several opportunities which we find of particular interest and which are in markets of substantial size upon which to build a real operating company. We have no specific restrictions imposed upon our search. I invite any shareholder who may be aware of a technology or a business opportunity, which they think may be of interest to the Company, to please contact me."
10. Intercell also had problems with the SEC with their reports. They had to restate them. This straight from the CEO. "Our previously announced plan to restructure, recapitialize and refinance Intercell Corporation was, unfortunately, delayed because of a frustratingly long effort to accommodate the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission on certain technical accounting issues relating to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999."
11. The CEO begs shareholders not to verify contracts with other companies. This is very troubling and suspect.
http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/investor/press_archive/shletter14_09_01.html
"We are currently engaged in extremely sensitive discussions with many major global players in the microelectronics industry. These discussions and future business relationships can and will be jeopardized if shareholders make direct contacts with any of these companies in what may be a well intentioned effort to find out what is going on.
Recently executives of one company, at the highest levels, contacted us expressing extreme and troubling concern about calls received from inquisitive shareholders. These executives felt "compromised” being faced with answering questions about what they deemed to be inside material information, which obviously they could not disclose or even affirm or deny. These contacts must stop otherwise we may lose the opportunity to ever again deal with these companies. It destroys our reputation to be a trustworthy partner."
Then shareholders check out contracts as per SEC recommendation. Boeing said "Nanopierce who?" and Infineon clearly stated they are not doing business with Nanopierce. Others said no comment or did not respond at all.
Also, if you say you are in a related company and ask for a sample to try out, test, they say NO. What does that tell you?
Paul then states 10/2001 through his promoter Kathy that he will no longer be providing information to shareholders because of message board posters trying to verify his information. I personally believe he received a cease and desist letter from Boeing as Boeing told me they were going to find out what was up with Nanopierce.
12. NPCT stock promoter Stockreporter sued by the SEC for fraud in his promotions. Here is the npct stock promotion. Here is the SEC lawsuit against the Stockreporter. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16680.htm
13. Here Metzinger claims there are huge oil reserves for a company when there weren't. http://www.mary.cc/npct/1.htm
14. Here are some investors burned by Paul posting on Silicon Investors about him and his scams. http://www.mary.cc/npct/3.htm
Here are lawsuit dockets
105 METZINGER, PAUL codc 1:1989cv00227 02/08/1989 850 02/23/1989
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE vs. PAUL METZINGER
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
the SEC report says June 2002
that's all the cash they have. klook has been wrong about many many things such as "good news coming in october," "good news and contracts soooon." I would believe the sec report before I'd believe a paid stock promoter .
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
astn's current volume is toxic funding
so the chart would be misleading. Generally volume is at 100K avg. When astn was above $1 with normal trading volume, I belive analysis made sense. Right now with toxic funding, delisting, possible bankruptcy, people not using the system much, I don't think TA analysis is very accurate.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
TA analysis makes no sense with stocks like astn
delisted to otcbb, soon to go bankrupt, no profits, toxic funding volume, known promoters on board... take your astn chart and throw it out the window.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
charts make no sense with .08 stocks
like astn
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
They are suing MMs at those companies
read the lawsuit.
please take a look at other lawsuits against people who work at those companies. Good company you say?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
ASTN director again sued for FRAUD
Valentine sure stays busy. Note the MMs names.
"Tuesday November 13, 9:46 am Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: Eagletech Communications Inc.
Eagletech Communications Sues 40 - Financial Firms, Market Makers, Brokers, & Individuals Charging Fraud & Conspiracy
Common Law Fraud, Civil Conspiracy, Conversion and Violation of the Rico Act Are Alleged in a Scheme to Manipulate the Company's Stock
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla., Nov. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Eagletech Communications Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: EATC - news) a wholesale provider of next generation enhanced telecom services to carriers today announced that it has filed suit in the Florida 11th Circuit Court against a total of over 40 defendants, including: Salomon Smith Barney, and six of its present or former NY-Wall Street area office high level executives, certain market makers, including Knight Securities, Schwab Capital Markets, and Thompson Kernaghan, certain broker/dealers including, Oscar Gruss & Son, Liss Financial, and National Securities, certain investment banking firms including, The Paradigm Group, Valley Forge Securities (formerly Bryn Mawr Investment Group), alter- ego corporations, Trinity Technology Management Incorporated, Lloyds Bahamas Securities LTD., former Eagletech CEO Robert Dobbs, and key individuals, Randall S. Goulding, John P. Dorocki, and John Serubo, among others. Eagletech is represented in this action by attorney firms O'Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle, of Houston, Texas, Christian Wukoson Smith & Jewell, also of Houston, Texas, and Arthur W. Tifford P.A., of Miami, Florida. The suit alleges among other things, that during the period from February 1999 through the present, the defendants, working in concert, orchestrated ``Pump & Dump'' then ``Toxic Convertible or Death Spiral'' schemes, reneged on subsequent funding commitments, and illegally manipulated the stock by an organized campaign of short selling to depress the price. This has resulted in the alleged bilking of at least $100 million dollars in market capitalization from the company's stock and ultimately from the pockets of its common shareholders, the attempted ``takeover'' of 95% of the company's stock and the attempted ``stealing'' of its valuable patented technology. The suit asks for compensatory damages, rescission of agreements, the return of millions of dollars in illegally converted property, treble damages, attorneys' fees, establishment of a constructive trust, and the right to plead punitive damages. A separate action against these defendants by the common shareholders is also contemplated.
``Most companies that have suffered this fate, are so financially weakened by the organized attacks on their stock, that they have little choice but to turn their companies over to these people, who after the takeover offer jobs and new funding, usually the same funding they once denied the company,'' stated Rod Young, Co-founder, President and CEO of Eagletech. ``We are the exception. We will not accept this brand of financial terrorism. We will rebuild this company!''
According to Young, ``Timely, best describes Eagletech's patented technology that delivers next-gen enhanced services to carriers without having to purchase next-gen switches. With the current telecom capital implosion well under way, billions in redundant capital expenditures could be preserved, by extending the function of existing switches with Eagletech's technology. The company's mission is to forge ahead, re-capitalize, establish new strategic relationships, and return the value that has been stolen from the shareholders. Eagletech is open for business!''
Lead council for Eagletech is John O'Quinn of O'Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle. Mr. O'Quinn was also the lead counsel for the State of Texas in the $16.5 billion settlement against the tobacco industry and is rated as one of the top ten plaintiffs counsel in the United States. He has obtained verdicts and settlements exceeding $25 billion in his career. Florida counsel, Arthur Tifford recently won a judgment in a similar ``Toxic Convertible'' - ``Death Spiral'' case totaling $389 million. ITIS dba Litidex, a wholly owned subsidiary of ITIS, Inc., formerly Internet Law Library (OTC Bulletin Board: ITII - news) has been retained by the law firms to handle litigation support.
Mr. O'Quinn stated, ``We filed this lawsuit based upon an investigation of the financing and of the principals and associates involved. It is our opinion that our client and its shareholders, like many others, have been victimized and damaged by predatory financing schemes involving numerous market makers and others designed to enrich the financiers to the ruination of the companies financed. When the financiers recognize tremendous potential in a company the scheme also includes the takeover of those companies. Our firm is committed to litigate this matter to a successful conclusion, regardless of the number of parties ultimately named, the time involved or the expenses we must incur or advance, for our clients.'' Gary M. Riebschalger of the firm said, ``The damage done to small companies and the people who work for them is outrageous. These arrogant, selfish financiers who use offshore devices and fraudulent schemes to enrich themselves at the expense of the people must stop. We will expose them and their 'fat cat' buddies to the bright light of justice.''...
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011113/fltu009_1.html
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
you think my post is incorrect
please post why and post reference links. Just saying "yer so rong" doesn't cut it.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
sara, you must email the SEC
that's the only way to get that information. It's also on pacer link. Please look it up.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
you guys are ridiculous
maybe you should ask me paul's secretary's shoe size and if I can't tell you, then voila, npct is a good investment and I'm lying about the SEC suing him. I posted the lawsuit and the link to pacer. I psoted the outcome. Please post a link to show that is not the case. I've proven my side, now prove me wrong.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
TWO lawsuits from SEC, 1988 and 1989
please read posts before you respond to them.
1988 case SEC wins against main defendants. They are given right to go after paul in colorado which was proper jurisdiction for paul alone. They chose not to go after him there as they won against the others. case closed 1/89
1989 case SEC won against sole defendant Metzinger. This is from the SEC. case closed 4/89.
The Commission's Computerized Data Base System of Records discloses that a
Civil Injunction was filed against a PAUL H. METZINGER in 1989.
Also, our data base system discloses a Securities Violation against a Paul H
Metzinger, dated April 10, 1989.
Chief, Public Reference Branch
email the SEC and check it out yourself.
why do you defend a guy sued by the SEC twice, sued for fraud a bunch of times, sued for racketeering, who has NEVER had a successful company in the many years he's been in this business?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
sara, do some research for once
I've backed everything up. Call paul and ask yourself. Do some DD. Don't just pick other people's posts apart for grammar, spelling, proper links. This link thing is your idea anyway. Go find some to refute what I've posted. 'go post some links that show I'm wrong, don't just say it. back up your posts
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
SEC vs Metzinger
in Colorado 1989. Penny stock fraud. Go ask paul yourself.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
1989 case was not dismissed
Where do you see dismissed. 1989!!!!
SEC vs Metzinger.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
.08 new all time low
.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I provided the information
you just refuse to look at it. 1989 SEC vs Paul Metzinger personally. The guy's a con man.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I just posted lawsuits on RB
again
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
post your drivers license and birth certificate
plus links to verify if you expect me to believe you are a real person.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
i posted all the lawsuits before
if i post them again you'll probably report me for spamming
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
1989 case SEC vs Metzinger
not the other SEC case against him.
1989 Securities fraud.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!