Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Now that is getting right to the root of the situation. Well said HP.
WRONG AGAIN! Bobinsd was the author and he posted many links and phone numbers at the EPA to back up the FACT that the EPA does not certify hydrogen EVER. Anyone who is interested might want to go back and look at his posts. They were very clear.
Of course the company expects good results. Can you just imagine a press release where they said that they expect poor results but what the heck, it is the last hurrah anyway. Now that would be truthful IMO.
A long time ago the links were posted that confirmed that the EPA does not certify hydrogen EVER. They do have a registry of fuel additives none of which are certified and neither the hy impact or the wildcat are listed.
And just who says I dont have shares? Get the price above 2c amd I will sell them to ya. As for Coates, he has a long way to go to EARN anyone's trust!
That is about as far from proof as you can get!
Do they really? Do you have any independent verification of that? Amd if you do have they actually done anything?
Good idea. Read what Coates said but when you do please read it all not just the most recent peppered with dreams that are nothing more than hope. Coates was bery clear that the testing was to entice an investor for R&D.
Merely coincidence and wishful thinking. What Coates did say was that while successful testing might bring minor sales it would allow the company to entice a major investor so that a marketable product could be developed. This is NOT the way that Uncle Sam does business.
What "trade secrets" were shared with others?
I agree hearing about a "strategic partner" that has contacts with the government among other contacts. I do not recall any discussions between HLNT and the government. Do you have a link to that?
Wishful thinking, creative coincidence, opportunity to deceive or maybe something else. Coates has misled so many times it is difficult to allow that there may be truth this time. There are those who will say that Coates did not say the government is doing the testing. While that may be true, he certainly has made hay of setting this up so that we will come to that conclusion even if wrong.
WOW! Won't that be a convenient coincidence! What a creative scheme, all things considered!
vacations?
Maybe but the company has to survive while they develop a marketable product. How will they do that without significant share dilution? Coates estimates greater than six months after a successful test. dont you see a problem here? Can they ever get the carrot off the stick or is it always just out of reach as the pps tanks even more?
Well that is the whole point isn't it? As I understand it the test is to show a potential investor that the concept is viable so that money will come in for R&D to make a product that will work. If that is true there is no contract from the government or anyone else just waiting on test results. So I ask again if there is anything good to come in for shareholders or if this ia all forward looking hype if anything at all?
That's creative for sure but it just does not add up. We were supposed to have results before the government shutdown. Then for unknown reasons it was extended and then came the government shutdown and then came the latest extension which is beyond their control.
OK lets assume you may be right. What would make this test any different from the first? In any reliable test it is going to have to perform on its own unless of course you plan on shipping a technician with each unit. As we already know even if it works the outcome will be an interest from a potential investor that will put in money for R&D so that they can develop a product for sale. There will not be a contract from the test, just investment. IMO that investment will serve to further dilute the shareholder interest and while the pps is pretty much at the bottom and may hold where it is it will not be moving north for a long time.
I think the reality here is that Coates has told us that he has no product for sale but wants to develop one. So how would even a positive test benefit us?
So it has to be used in court to be evidence? Suppose that you go outside and everything is wet. Can't that be "evidence" that it probably rained?
Acvuracy? honesty?
Launch-it is the plaintiff in a lawsuit aginst HTI/AHS because they never got paid. Velociti has not been heard from in a long time. It takes sales for Velociti to have anything to do so that is no surprise.
Not true at all. I forecasted that he would probably blame no testing on the government shutdown and that looks like exactly what he did. Feel free to see a silver lining if you wish but all I see is inefficiency and ineffectiveness in this CEO.
Several posters forecasted that Coates would blame no testing on the government shutdown. Looks like that is exactly what he did ve. In any event he said that the lack of testing was beyond his control. Make of it what you will but you cannot have it both ways. Ineffectiveness in a CEO is never a positive trait.
High road? That presupposes that testing was actually being done. Several posters on here forecasted that Coates would blame it on the shutdown and so he did. That is far from the highroad imo. None of Coates timelines has been met and it is always beyond his control and someone else's fault. IMO Coates has got to accept the responsibility and make things happen. Between AHS and Mr. D, it looks like over 2 million has flowed thru this company on the past year and a half. They are broke and do not have a marketable product. You call that the high road? ROTFLMAO!
That was more than three years ago. Why is it relevant to any discussion today?
The only explanation I can see is that Coates has not been minding the business. Too many vacations? This is a good example of why such small things as the lawn are important. all of the small things are important!
What a CEO!
Well that is certainly creative. So you are suggesting that a system that only gets 3% might be used to put American lives at risk? I can just imagine how that would work: GI Joe is driving across Afghanistan and the driver is having to adjust it every time he goes up a hill or down the other side. Then in the middle of a firefight the unit leaks, and trashes the turbo and GI Joe gets taken prisoner and decapitated on u-tube. Yeah right the military is really interested I am sure. Nah, Coates is hoping someone will believe that so maybe some insiders can sell more shares maybe? Or he can do a PIPE maybe?
What does that have to do with the HLNT site being down?
Coates is no Moses so forget the delivering but as to the screams, so let it be written, so let it be done. Coates does not know how to make it work and has no one on his staff with the ability either.
As much as I agree with your sentiment the jackass comparison is a true insult to all self respecting male donkeys.
007, a "safe harbor" is not an absolute defense.
There are those that will try to defend everything no matter how ridiculous. Most likely is the web site became just the latest bill not paid. I wonder when the a/s will increase so that more shares can be sold to keep the company "in business"? Do I see a PIPE in our future? How about another vacation?
No, it does not make it a lie automatically but if it is self serving and blames someone else then without independent verification he may as well not said it. It is sort of like the little boy who cried WOLF... he did it to himself by not being completely honest in the past!
Just because it was clearly stated in a shareholder letter does not make it so. Coates blew his own credibility long ago and only has himself to blame. Without independent verification nothing he says can be believed IMO.
Since HTI does not have a website any more does it matter?
It is up to you to show that anyone called Tyson.
The first question is why would anyone want to steal a design that does not work?
All Coates would have to do would be to have his patent lawyer, if he really has one, issue a statement that he is presently working on a patent for HLNT.
Then show a link or a video of Tyson saying any such thing. Coates does not have any credibility without independent verification. And that is completely his fault.
What patent? More non-credible ramblings IMO.
Says who? Tyson never said any of that. It is only from the non-credible ramblings and "blame someone else" mentality from the company that we heard any of that. If it was actually getting 5.4 % a few phone calls would have been nothing. Coates has never addressed how "we all know who" would know who to call in the first place. The story is totally laughable but go ahead believing it if it makes the loss of investment with this stock easier to deal with.
Check this out. I went to look at the HLNT website and what do you see?
"Sorry, the website www.highlineinnovations.com cannot be found." Whats more is that emails sent to amy of the addresses are bouncing as undeliverable.
Just who did someone call to make that happen?