Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ok we believe you
it's relevant. Very relevant. Like I've said many times, you can not judge this president by his actions and conveniently ignore all the others. We compare everything else when judging president. Ratings, accomplishments and all. Why do you think there are pages and pages comparing these things. what you're saying is the equivalent of saying you don't judge pro ball playing based on what pro ball player have logged in the history of that respective game. How do you know whats great or bad if you have no history to go by. If a player scores 3 runs within a game we wouldn't know if it's ok, great, or historic if there's no history to judge it by. That's just how it is and denying it doesn't change it. It's ludicrous to even suggest different.
You need to go back and research. You're making youself look bad and are obviously guessing. I just gave you one. Privacy is a constitutional right and it was changed with surveillance order.
It was legal as of the creation of the executive order is the point.
So you ignore the fact that Bush created this? But at same time take a shot at Obama for not removing yet. that's hilarious.
So your saying old links don't count?
Hmm stupid.....
You don't want to address any other presidents records that's all Because there's a clear case that can be made. More of same. If it doesn't fit your little box it's stupid or the person posting is stupid. That's just stupid.
You have to to pick up previous president's executive order records. Wait let me see if Bush had any executive orders after 2009. Nope
Link in first post
From first link
Wonder what the though would be here if Obama make it legal for the NSA to easedrop on your phone calls. We know the answer to that.
http://people.howstuffworks.com/executive-order3.htm
Talk about shady executive orders...
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/recycled/2009/01/ten_to_toss.html
Remember seeing almost the exact same post in 2010, 11, 12, 13 and 14. does nothing. You will be chasing. Think I remember you back then as well *
If it was legal for Bush and all the rest it's legal for him. They all have written their own laws. just can't get around that as a fact. Make all the attempts you want to create separation but they have all done it. But somehow it's different now.
The problem with money in politics, lobbyist and citizen's united. Politians too close the business. Headed faster than ever to being an oligopoly government thanks to the Supreme court defining money as speech.
http://m.slashdot.org/story/212797
You posted 18 months now it means nothing? Keep moving the goal post.
Well like I said we will see soon. Imo some here will be chasing.
No he's not. Facts are there to suport otherwise. Everything else is just opinion based on feelings.
I guess we will see soon won't we. Also part can be paid in Q4 and some in Q1 as he mentioned it would be paid off "in" Q1 not before it.
Do we know no money was made in fourth quarter?
Thats kind of redirecting the conversation. It started with supposedly him running wild with volume of executive order. It's been proven here that he has done no more than any other presidents. You have presidents in the upper hundreds. 700, 900, 1000+. His average per year is less than them all. That's what executive orders are there for. To get things done you can't through normal the legislative process and emergencies. Congress can't block all legislation and then complain that the president use other means since they refuse to come to the table. Still haven't proven how he's misused the power. When the actual supreme court rules as unconstitutional in action for you may have a case. Until then I just believe it's more rheteric from the Republican party and it's media outlets as an ongoing smear campaign. No one still hasn't addressed the issue of other presidents clear heavy volume of executive order either. I know why because there is no case there but up until now that's what was believed. That he had somehow executed a rediculous amount of orders. When you see it on paper stack against other presidents you see just how much of a lie it is.
Back then is the whole essence of the subject. Back then connects to now. Start up pinksheet companies critical window is 18 months. So your implication is wrong.
as far as the Brav surviving or not that's has been said for years now and is frankly getting old. Staying at same level? You forgot "imo" as that is exactly what it is. We will find out soon though.
Raising capital through various means means dilution and loans to me. Bravada has survived well over the range of 18 month that you are implying was only extended through raising capital. I'm merely setting the record straight.
*0* dilution three years except 4.3 million share which was not for business operations. And one loan due to be paid off this quarter.
Have say thanks for that link. Started a detailed look into what the executive orders are. A lot of them are actually great orders even some here would secretly like.
Imo and many he's not running wild but everyone is entitled to their opinion because in the end that's all it is.
As far as being a community organizer, he's been one of the best. I was on displayed and illistrated with what's called the Obama ground game. The one that won him two elections.
Reference from president to president. If this is supposed to be to prove abuse, well how do we judge. Is the cap at 100, 200, 300? None of those numbers mean anything without the law of recent averages. If he's supposedly overusing then the last at least 17 out of 18 presidents have as well. Didn't remember hearing any outrage when both Bushes, Clinton, Reagan and Carter racked up the same. Obama has a lower average per year than all of them. The proof is in the pudding. There is no abuse. Another cooked up right wig cry in an attempt to polarize, paralyze, stifle this president and his presidency.
Even in your link it shows Bush with 100 more executive orders
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php
Every link I find he still hasn't surpassed Bush and is average at worse when looking at other presidents. How you gauge is by what other presidents have done past imo. Throwing up a number with no reference point is a slighted was of narrating the subject
Immigration has been the only other executive order. If more what are they? The point is he has not run wild with them as it has been claimed. Fact
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/every-presidents-executive-actions-in-one-chart/
Thought Obama was running wild with executime order. A tyrant and self appointed king if you ask some. Saw this and was like whattttt! He hasn't even passes Bush part deuce
Bush one had 40+ in 4 years.
Btw there is not a link in every post here that gives info about Obama. Didn't know if you had noticed that or not. you seem to be missing a few this happening as in case where you in boxed me a warning about stupid being in one of my post when it originated from someone directing it to me And no warning was sent to them which you confirmed.
As far you giving a rats azz? I don't give a rat's azz about you not giving a rat's azz.
So I was busted because what I posted was true but I didn't include link. Hmmm ok
Is he against the minimum wage?
Did he say he would have not had a chance at some of the jobs he had if MW was increased?
Did the minimum wage get increased during the his time in college when he had the so called crap jobs?
If the answer is yes to them all which it is then he's a hypocrite and a liar. Doesn't get any simpler than that.
That was my point and believe that was what the article intended to show.
Wondering where Busted comes in. The guy says plainly he's against a minimum wage hike and said if there had been a minimum wage increase when he was working as a youth he wouldn't have had a chance at half those jobs if the federal government had raised the minimum wage. We'll turns out it there is an example of it being raised three times. Not just three times but three consecutive years. ?
During Boehner’s time in college -- when he was at those humbling jobs -- the minimum wage went up three times. In May 1974, it was raised to $2.00 an hour. In January 1975, it went to $2.10 an hour. And in January 1976, the wage went up again, to $2.30 an hour. (This threefold increase in the federal minimum wage did not affect farm workers, but Boehner wasn’t working on a farm.)
Wow and this guy is against raising the minimum wage and said he wouldnt have had a chance at the jobs he worked at if minimum wages had increased.