Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is a technical bounce, nothing more. It broke outside the BB and must get back inside of them. Minimum .02 close today, and in the coming days, could re-test .05
I got away from technicals on this trade and guess what?
NEVER AGAIN!
Well aren't you just a GENIUS! How did you know it was going to tank...
Where are you getting these said documents?
When the BOD shuts down the profitable affiliate network...what does that look like to you? 40M in revenue they walked away from...purposely!
This BK is total bullshit, and an effort for the BOD to screw us. Period. Let them try...
True penny stock? Really? 40M in revenues of affiliate network that was criminally diluted for a takeover that we got in the middle of, and the BOD and the rest of the cronies tanked it?
This ain't no true penny stock Jimmy. Know your facts.
You know what I learned from this?
When you're up 500%, get the phuck out! End of story!
HOLY SHIT!
I have only 3 words for the BOD...
BURN IN HELL!
It will shortly...I can promise you that.
That was a silver bullet find there. Nice one
Rather than acting like Yoda, how about if you come out with it? Yeah, I think I'd like to hear it rather than this cryptic BS that sends everyone on a wild goose chase.
That's music baby...music.
I'm pretty sure there are enough investors here to generate SEC interest. We may never get our money back, as I'm in the hole now, but one thing is for sure...
THESE BASTARDS SHOULD GET WHAT IS COMING TO THEM IF THEY DID ANYTHING WRONG!
I was referring to the court system sir...and the raping and pillaging of ATRN assets.
And for the record, it appears that Mr. Bermeister shut down his twitter account
I wonder why Mr. Internet / Digital would do such a thing?
So we are all in agreement that Kazaa was essentially stolen back from ATRN, right?
If so, and the rumors that Kazaa code could be tweaked to develop or maintain filtering of copyright material, then I believe we have a winner...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-bermeister/is-content-king_b_1544290.html
From the guy himself...
Sure...let me explain in very succint terms...
It's called self dealing or unjust enrichment...and...
It is excluded from every D&O insurance policy out there. So the BOD is running around the Board room like this:
*****sigh*****
We prove anything wrong, which it sure seems like a slam dunk, and it's straight to their personal assets.
One thing is damn clear...
I like the volume...
The IBox needs an update.
I hate to say this, but if someone was shorting in the .05s, it makes sense to buy to cover. Nice little profit, and is most likely the culprit of those large buys IMHO.
IF it happens, there is going to be unbelievable fallout from this, especially some posters on this board. Insider trading is serious shit. And with how many eyes are on this, the SEC will get plenty of info.
One thing is definitely certain with this new info...
Something is rotten in Denmark...
Bud, read yours and the SEC definitions I posted. I think your wrong, but I'm on my phone now and its a pain to go back and forth between windows for a lengthy post. I'll do it later.
It makes absolutely ZERO sense to have shut down Kazaa (the monetary black hole), to continue to have revenues as of 3rd Q last year, to be a top 25 ad/search organization, with minimal debt versus revenues, only to shut down the business, send a letter to clients which really, really screws yourself if you are the BOD, and file for BK!
The BOD would be inundated and they know it.
For those of you running around here shooting your mouth off, lets clear something up...
http://www.sec.gov/answers/insider.htm
Insider Trading
"Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. The legal version is when corporate insiders—officers, directors, and employees—buy and sell stock in their own companies. When corporate insiders trade in their own securities, they must report their trades to the SEC. For more information about this type of insider trading and the reports insiders must file, please read "Forms 3, 4, 5" in our Fast Answers databank.
Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.
Examples of insider trading cases that have been brought by the SEC are cases against:
Corporate officers, directors, and employees who traded the corporation's securities after learning of significant, confidential corporate developments;
Friends, business associates, family members, and other "tippees" of such officers, directors, and employees, who traded the securities after receiving such information;
Employees of law, banking, brokerage and printing firms who were given such information to provide services to the corporation whose securities they traded;
Government employees who learned of such information because of their employment by the government; and
Other persons who misappropriated, and took advantage of, confidential information from their employers.
Because insider trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets, the SEC has treated the detection and prosecution of insider trading violations as one of its enforcement priorities.
The SEC adopted new Rules 10b5-1 and 10b5-2 to resolve two insider trading issues where the courts have disagreed. Rule 10b5-1 provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if a trader is "aware" of the material nonpublic information when making the purchase or sale. The rule also sets forth several affirmative defenses or exceptions to liability. The rule permits persons to trade in certain specified circumstances where it is clear that the information they are aware of is not a factor in the decision to trade, such as pursuant to a pre-existing plan, contract, or instruction that was made in good faith.
Rule 10b5-2 clarifies how the misappropriation theory applies to certain non-business relationships. This rule provides that a person receiving confidential information under circumstances specified in the rule would owe a duty of trust or confidence and thus could be liable under the misappropriation theory.
So in short, here's my take:
This tipping of info by clients IS INSIDER TRADING, and some of you folks are guilty of it. Period. Further, there is a confidentiality portion to sharing that information, and no client would EVER, EVER receive info that they are going to file bankruptcy prior to the news being released. The BOD has a duty of loyalty and fiduciary duty to US FIRST, not to their clients.
In short, those of you spouting that you know or that someone else knows, is FULL OF SHIT IMHO.
Have a good day. This back and forth is nonsense.
Craig Campbell removed as Controller on ATRN website. Giordano listed on Leadership team. Whatever the phuck this means in this circus...
I hear you. I got greedy...because the stochastics and the MACD on the weekly chart said they needed to recover.
Unfortunate...
Look back to May 15th. The MACD showed divergence on the chart (i.e. the MACD was steadily rising while the stock fell). Top price was .05 during that day. Generally, when chart divergences happen, the price returns to that pricing relatively quickly.
Have a look at ATRN when that exact same thing happened at the price of .25
GLTY...And yes, AIMHO
Real price of this one is around .05
I've had the extraordinary pleasure of recognizing that this site is junk.
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20120606.txt
Same data, same answer.
Don't get me wrong, I hope it runs, but not likely due to shorting, or the reg sho and 4320 rule flags would be tripped.
FINRA data is SHORT VOLUME. Short volume does not mean only those shares sold short. It means two items, those shares sold short and those shares bought to cover.
Only when the Rule 4320 Flag and Reg Sho flags are tripped do you see uncovered short sales that indicate, don't guarantee, a short covering.
You are WRONG
This is going to blow by the end of the week...
LOL! I love your signature!
Did you know that 68% of stats are made up on the spot...
Sure, but the 'agency' business, meaning all revenue, is out the window right now as they are ceasing these operations...
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
"IF" .05 holds up today, this is ROCK BOTTOM
Now this post shows you know nothing about this stock...
Wtf? UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!