is filling out his status report.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ah, this board is 9/11 Revisited, not Bette Davis Revisited.
rollingrock: Duh! The Patriot Act IS AGAINST The Constitution and The Bill of Rights. It seeks to usurp the rule of law. Surely, even, you can grasp that.
aim hier: please define a conservative and what they are supposed to believe and stand for. And please, one thousand words or less.
allyaustin: cool; one can construct far more flamboyant castles with spam than conventional building blocks. Furthermore, one does not have to worry about kids and cats and dogs toppling the masterpiece.
dropdeadfred: hey man, great to have you here.
chunga1: oh my, that's a relief. I feared you were referring to metrosexual. Snick! Snick!
Briboy: please follow this thread, going back and follow the example, please. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27173064
A PM with a link should allow for a good discussion. It'll be like a scene out of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
SoxFan: I just sent you a PM. This sets a fine example for this board. You deserve some gold stars.
SoxFan: I'll be glad to take up the discussion at some place like Zeev's. It was no laughing matter that Martin Luther King was opposed by so-called liberals.
Susie924: no problem: anyone that violates TOU and a board's stated purpose is certainly demanding to be banned.
Susie924: you're way out of line. That is patently false. We long for logical and civil debate.
SoxFan: that's really off topic here. The smashing of racial oppression, for starters. You ought to read what Malcolm X had to say about "liberals." The whole eugenics movement was and still is at the hands of socialists.
Susie924: that's your opinion and I'm so inclined that way, also. In this case, the poster demanded it. You know, what's a mother to do?
Susie924: why would I want to waste any more time with someone that simply does not want to engage in a civil and logical debate? He had his chance.
But you're free to dance the Masochistic Tango, if you so desire.
I confess to being addicted to this board already. I think I'm getting the Jones.
Susie924: no; not until you told me and I looked.
Rawnoc: bull, all you had was one of several million views. Your clouded agenda clouded your view. You have zero credibility here. In a court of law, your testimony would easily be impeached.
Rawnoc: so you didn't notice the explosive residue that covered lower Manhattan for weeks? And you call others a looney? Did you notice the molten metal at ground zero for months? Yeah, your IHub's forensic expert, all right.
Rawnoc: this post is indicative as to why you are banned on so many boards on IHub. You refuse to debate facts but simply resort to attacks.
Rawnoc: are you claiming that the media videos and other filmings are fake? Since you witnessed it, please explain how three steel frame building went down at near free fall speed in a rhythmic and symmetrical fashion, each into their own footprints with less than 1% non-metallic debris. Did you also see the alleged suicide bombers walk away from the scene? Nice trick that, at least eight of them, were known to be alive afterward.
Rawnoc: you're getting off on the wrong foot here. I didn't refer to you as a looney for believing the gumit's cockamamie story, so stick with the discussion at hand.
The day of the Oklahoma City bombing, a friend pointed out on television that a "car bomb" blew up the building. Having a certain military background and no preconceived agenda or dogmas, I simply stated that it was impossible. He insisted. I then asked as to where was the bomb crater. I pointed out how geometrically a ground bomb would have created a different type of damage and nearby buildings were not affected the same way. I further pointed out that the building was exploded from the inside.
It was widely reported, at first, on the media the delays in getting in rescue workers into The Murrah Building as response teams had to first remove large amounts of undetonated explosives from the building. This was a high security SECTIONAL federal building. One would to have had a certain clearance to be able to place the charges.
Furthermore, the government would claim that it was the van contained ammonium nitrates explosives. The problem with this story is the residue. There was none, unlike the 1993 WTC bombing where rescue workers coming in 45 minutes later were covered with the residue. Furthermore, the distance of the van to the building prohibits the scope of damage. It's a simple law of physics.
The government rushed in to cover up the evidence. They were in such a rush that they used the same company that did another "clean up." Then there was the preposterous claim of Governor Lawton to have found the axle of the van with the VIN plate on it. Now that was quite a trick. All credibility is lost once the lies begin.
Here's what one of the finest experts in explosives and demolition had to say. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4224779103128976372
Rawnoc: that would be an inaccurate statement, on many avenues. One tends to hear firecrackers up close and out in the open. The masking and other factors may or may not contribute to subjective sonic measurements.
That being said, detonation chord is a different type of explosion. There are many videos on The 'Net of controlled demolitions. The charges themselves aren't really that loud. The question that you need to ask yourself, is how these explosions where going off in the first place and how they contradict the official feral gumit whack job story.
Briboy: yes, you are quite right and one needs to learn the purpose of these artificial sectra, in the first place.
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate." (Noam Chomsky)
''That's not the way the world really works anymore. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'' (Sr. White House Advisor, as reported by Ron Suskind)
The Virtual Cat: yes, sort of like a "normal " cat; unless it was a cat that uncovered a child porn stash. That would definitely be Austin.
rollingrock: your responses evoke hearing the strings of a Chatty Cathy doll pulled. A sound comes out, but ...
You are proved wrong on all counts. Right now, you're wasting my time with your childishness. I know the whole Constitution and The Bill of Rights. I have studied the Federalist Papers. I have read The Articles of Confederation. My reading comprehension is in the 99th percentile.
You were given a comparison between The Bill of Rights and the tyrannical Patriot Act. The rule of law was measured in the scales of justice and The Patriot is exposed for what it is. It turned out far too much for you to grasp.
I don't know why you hate what this country stands for. You actually have a right to believe those things that you do. However, it makes no sense to us patriots.
Good bye.
PegnVA: aren't you forgetting The Martha's Vineyard Blimp?
brainlessone: she is right, except that it was mad science gone astray, and most of the initial testing was on black people. Now given the history of American cash-register medicine's charter membership in the eugenics crowd, one can, at least, understand the basis for her claim.
brainlessone: as many things as have gone astray, in this nation, there still exists the framework of a judicial system. We have witnessed, for decades, some of the highest officials, in law enforcement and justice, deliberately name innocent individuals, as guilty of crimes, without due process. The ABTT Networks became the jury and the bulk of the populace accepted the verdict.
Our CIA and the State Department have this horrid track record of usurping the governments of sovereign nations. Now, in recent years, so many of these nations, then become ruled by radical Islam.
After so much study, it is so obvious that to vote for a member, of The CFR and/or any of the interlocking think tanks and secret societies, is a vote for killers and tyrants.
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate." (Noam Chomsky)
''That's not the way the world really works anymore. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'' (Sr. White House Advisor, as reported by Ron Suskind)
Briboy: there were times that the scribes and Pharisees received a verbal two-by-four up along the head in order that they might receive a message of love and hope and forgiveness and peace.
z, that's beautiful. Thanks for posting it.
Susie924: in all seriousness, I can and do respect your definition and even your principles on that. However, that cannot ever negate the definitions and principles that others possess. You and woofer grew up with a different set of rules.
My brother and I grew up with the ambush rule. That could scare you, if you knew me, in person.
Susie924: I consider woofer a friend, loosely. One can never have enough loose friends, even if she isn't from Austin (which is a private joke that she may or may not get). Loose friends, on IHub, send each other strange and funny PMs. Furthermore, this post was deliberately written, in such a way, to insure that I'll get several.
Oh! Can you feel the love?
allyaustin: the enforcement and application of TOU strikes one with the imagery of the gradual disintegration and perversion of the Seven Commandments of Orwell's Animal Farm. This word picture is both apropos and on topic for this board. It's quite paradoxical that ones who look to suppress the liberties of a number of regulars here, come here to do so; knowing the great latitude that he/she would not be accorded elsewhere.
Woooooweeeeee! It must be a dark and rainy day.
Wall: no giving away secrets. LOL
Tina Marie: your posts here remind me of the lyrics from the rock song that was Kenny Rogers's first real big hit. Have fun with the puzzle.
woofer: for the most part, the deception that news reporters played, in the events of 9/11, were afterward, from mainly omissions. Later, they were lockstep with the propaganda machine.
A good crime investigator follows the evidence to its conclusion; making no pre-set judgments along the way. Many folks lack the discipline to follow such a trail. Lazy opinions then come forth. The role of The ABTT Networks interruption of the path of evidence is still very disturbing. I get the impression that you think along those lines and your point does not contradict this thought process.
woofer: concentrate at 2:55 et seq. That could HAVE ONLY COME FROM AN EXPLOSION. Great isolated film. The pigs missed seizing one.
arkieboy1: yeppers, you got it. However, not just falling; but being thrust horizontally and vertically upwards. A mere collapse cannot do that.
Vexari: my Mr. Potato Head didn't look quite so pristine. Truly one of the greatest toys ever invented. Too bad The Prestidigitator lacked the imagination to actually play with it. Maybe that explains why David Rockefeller never asked me to join The CFR.