Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
anticipate what you want, my presence here changes NOTHING about PBLS and their management. Killing the messenger does not change the facts.
it looks like it has found support here, but thats until we find out what these guys are really up to. I would think we go higher, but that would be purely on technicals. They are throwing around alot of s**t, and we need to see what sticks and how much of it hits the fan, but yes, I think we trend higher from here, but doubt it we will see anything over .012 without the financials.
i think the only ones associated with PBLS that have a great future will be the attorneys.
you need to look into their 10Q,, most of the profit was from having a large amount of their debt forgiven. other than that, they are losing $ hand over fist.
thats one way to get a shareholder off your back , I guess.
did you tell her you own pbls? that might change her mind. Congrats.
one slight problem might be that sljb might be under Canadian jurisdiction and therefore that 15% shareholder thing might not apply to US companies.
I think the key term is "believed to be outstanding" and in any case if there is a suit to demand that, they would have to show how many shares are outstanding in order to comply to discovery.
it is not a market makers job to prevent "out of character volatility" How would you do that? by not accepting the trade? It is the brokerage firm that is carrying the account to confirm the validity on any trades done, once they are sent down the line to trading,its too late. when MM's see huge huge orders that they do not have the other side in hand, they print what they are legally required to and get out of the way.
PBLS will not trade at that multiple of revenue. a multiple of 7x positive cash flow would be dead on.
this IS very unusual. Most publicly traded companies that boast of seeing 1 billion in revenues in the foreseeable future file financials.
what does a "born date" have to do with anything?
and how do you know what the share count is?
so continuing a conversation is spam?
we need alot more teeth and a good attorney.
it can't hurt and is a good substitute for primal scream therapy.
Since I am on the subject, how bout this little gem from the announcement of 7/20/06.......
Mr. Alonzo commented further, “We find it very interesting that after Hurricane Katrina our shareholders envisioned huge growth of our Murphy Sand & Gravel operations, they just didn’t realize that they were nearly a year early in their speculation.”
I take this to mean that there was as of the date of that announcement there was "huge growth of our Murphy Sand & Gravel operations" AGAIN, AT THE TIME OF THAT ANNOUNCEMENT! then we find out on Sept 26th "The Department of Transportation load limit restrictions cause the wide spread in increased revenues shown above. Once the load limits are eased, revenues could again increase sharply."
DID THEY NOT KNOW OF THE LOAD RESTRICTIONS WHEN THEY MADE THE JULY 20TH ANNOUNCEMENT????
look at it this way. You guys call the IR guy, get some whiney NSS story, so that they can place blame elsewhere, and go away all happy and ready to buy more stock...and when you ask real questions, you get ....... a whiny NSS story.....
why are you so obsessed with oct 15th???
I will go on record as saying if they do not file financials by next summer, or if they are materially different than what they have said in their press releases, there will be a civil suit brought against them. The share price tells me they are full of it. Don't think for a minute that NSS do not do research and know what stocks to blast. One of the legal questions will be "what is the definition of "very soon". In a court of law, the definition is "what a reasonable person believes it to be" 1 year is my limit.
Every company must answer to shareholders. We should think about a suit to order them to ungag the TA. They are making announcements clearly designed to attract buyers of the stock. Who's stock were we buying?
It is time to stop drinking the damn Kool-aid! how can you sit there and believe that NSS story? yes there is NSS, but the real question is WHY???? because PBLS is a great undervalued company? An undiscovered Gem? because the NSS'ers are stupid and don't know a great company when they see it???
People, shareholders are owners of the company! Quit laying down for these guys! Demand REAL answers!
How can you possibly read my posts and think I have any power over the price of the stock. In the know? Hardly. Understand basic accounting and GAAP, yes. Understand what the street is saying about the company? yes. Understand the amatuerish nature of the compay's communication to the public? Guilty. Understand THAT THE MANAGEMENT OF PBLS IS NOT A FRIEND OF THEIR SHAREHOLDERS? ABSOLUTELY!
if it wasn't for shareholders like myself who try to put management's feet to the fire, you guys wouldn't stand a chance. These guys only respond to pressure, and I intend to bring as much of it as possible.
we can say the same thing if it is delisted.
why will the stock not move until they are done?
yes, I do.
funny how being a pain in the butt MIGHT get results sometimes... it does seem the more angry this board gets, the better response we get.
$2,505.00 worth of stock???
I doubt that the OS # will be that important once we have audited financials, If they do have 1.9 billion OS, there's going to be alot worse things in the financials than the # of outstanding shares.
if we get audited numbers and the O/S is less than 2 billion, I'll be happy.
possible PR.
how do you come up with that conclusion?
and FMV for your great winner is .006 per share. There's my proof.
the certs come directly from the transfer agent , certified mail. It isnt a question of a brokerage house honouring them, it would be about the transfer agent honoring them when they were delivered back to the txfr agent by pbls, or any other seller.
I am no friend of the company , and I did get a check. It was a fair buyback, and they did the right thing for halting it. They should however, provide updates on the current status.
that is under the lesser-of-cost or market value assumption, KEY PHRASE = LESSER OF it is a write off, not an increase from cost to market value which you have been trying to prove to me. You can certainly write down underperforming assets at any time,ie. a write off of inventory, etc. NOW, SHOW ME A COMPANY THAT SHOWS AN ASSET AT MARKET COST WHEN IT IS GREATER THAN ACQUISITION COST
Next. The NASDAQ is publicly traded, not The NASD. The financials you showed me are for the NASD, not NASDAQ.
Nice try though....
you forgot the part about the Cubs winning the world series and peace in the middle east.
I read it. I see investments which are carried at market. these consist of debt and equity securities.I see nothing on investment property, what page are you referring to?. I see nothing that says their leases are carried at market value. where is that? Meanwhile, this isnt a publicly traded company.
Shelby, this "company", the NASD, isnt a publicly traded company is it?
what brokerage firm are they using?