Shorty Hunter
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Were those comments before or after he became the compliance guy?
These individuals are not holders I suspect but connected to the previous management and governance.
It would not surprise me if they are parties to litigation.
Yep - shorty gonna burn. There is no shorty, but they gonna burn. 🔥
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/end-naked-short-selling-230100677.html
Repeating the same falsehood and claiming f that has been litigated already does not change reality.
Share those meaningful volumes circus man.
So you are accusing him of fraud and have not identified another account?
That sounds like a libelous accusation to me.
Spending your time making personal attacks about individuals who may or may not post here seems irrelevant to the Company.
I imagine that by the very nature of naked shorting, fees and legitimate reporting don’t exist.
No coincidence, it’s a legit duplicate question. If a form 211 is not required to become pink current what advantage or disadvantage exist?
If a company is in expert market, you can buy and sell if you are in Canada. You can sell in expert market no matter what. How is that any more decimating that the usual pump and dump?
What evidence do you have of abusive shorts against ASTA? I always suspected it, but by the very nature of naked shorts or counterfeit shares, they are difficult to identify in routine reporting.
ASTA and Naked Shorts?
Don’t know but the internet says…
Pink sheet stocks, often traded on the OTC (Over-the-Counter) market, can be susceptible to “naked short selling” or illegal short selling practices, just like stocks listed on major exchanges. Naked short selling involves selling shares of a stock without actually borrowing them or ensuring that they can be borrowed, which is illegal.
While the practice of naked short selling is not limited to a specific type of stock or exchange, penny stocks and those traded on the OTC markets, including pink sheets, may be more vulnerable to manipulation due to lower trading volumes and less stringent reporting requirements. It’s essential for investors to be aware of the potential risks associated with these markets and conduct thorough research before investing in any stock, including pink sheet stocks, to understand the potential for short selling abuses and other market risks.
What does FINRA care about ASTA? They cleared the Form 211 with ease.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
On the topic about ASTA and naked shorts, painting the last minute buys up or down.
FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) does not have the authority to charge someone with a crime. FINRA is a self-regulatory organization that regulates the securities industry and its members, but it does not have the power to bring criminal charges. If FINRA identifies potential criminal activity during its regulatory oversight, it typically refers such matters to appropriate law enforcement agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Department of Justice, which have the authority to investigate and bring criminal charges if warranted.
So basically, nobody really cares until the SEC decides to care.
Undisputed Facts Since 2019:
There has been no dilution
There has been no reverse split
There has been no toxic notes
There has been early revenue
There has been action taken against bad actors.
There has been serious polarization
There has been tremendous legal wrangling
There must be something worth fighting over
I guess we will find out.
FINRA is a private company, not a regulatory authority as you have mentioned before.
I would not call this word salad. I would call it word
Coleslaw.
Maybe he/she/them can ask the Company not some anonymous stock board participant.
If you want Company facts, go the the disclosures. It is the Company’s declared outlet for facts.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/380551/content
Now if you fail to read them, don’t want to believe them or dislike the answers, then you will be disappointed.
Why resort to name calling? It isn’t very nice or helpful.
On the topic of ASTA and individual opinions and good vibes or negative vibes:
Cicero wrote about the importance of distinguishing between facts and opinions. He argued for the use of reason and evidence in debates, and he emphasized that there is an objective reality that should be the basis for discussions.
The negative vibes or good vibes originate from each party with a vested interest, pro or con. I am pointing out some of the most obvious categories.
According to the law suit testimony under oath, your assertion would be inaccurate. Read the filings - grab some pop corn first.
I disagree and not resorting to name calling, or accusing anyone here of lying. I pointed out the topics for discussion or debate.
It is clear that we won’t see eye to eye on the topic of good vibes, accountability or accuracy on each others statements.
I will go with the verified facts by competent sources.
I was pointing out the “literally” claim. That statement is absolute and I was asking about the reference that makes it a fact instead of an opinion.
What is the basis of fact with your claim?
Can you share your references or your assumptions?
Hmmmmm indeed.
Based on my astute investor DD I suspect those who may have a lot of negative vibes towards this stock could be one or more of the following.
1. Former Love Interest
2. Former Direct Investors
3. Former Bag Holders
4. Former Board Members
5. Former Lenders
6. Former Promoters
7. Former Partners
8. Idealist who want to warn others that is stock should be avoided because they know something we don’t.
Grab some Pop Corn and read the Law Suit drama
Now there is a mistruth.
RICO ~ SUAVE
That fake app was part of the previous management scam.
So ASTA is a dead stock now that they have a MM?
An 11 year old case? Wow - shiver me timbers.
So what do you call it when you champion a stock and don’t sell any?
What do you call it when you short a stock and bash on it?
Facts are facts. You can have your own opinion, but facts are facts. These facts about ASTA are truthful facts.
Some anonymous posters hating on other poster seems like an opinion to me.
Which cult are you referring to? Isn’t that libel?
?? ASTA SHORT SQUEEZE ??
Does anybody believe there is a short squeeze on ASTA right now?
What is the difference between these terms when it comes to ASTA?
Short Interest
Short Volume
Naked Shorts
Short Squeeze
Short Term
Short Sighted
Short Temper
Tellin' great big lies
Thank you
Randy Newman
Wow - you are a prolific writer and so much to say. I can’t wait to hear more of your imaginations and speculation about ASTA.
Since 2019
No dilution
No loans
Multiple Venture Partners
Early Revenues
Promises Kept
Litigating against pump and dump founders and their toxic lenders.
Bring the deets and receipts. This is a broad sweeping generalization.
How does one libel an anonymous individual on a stock board?
How would I know what your physical stature is? I don’t for a minute assume you are anything such as a lawyer, day trader, fund manager, registered broker dealer, long/tall or short/fat. Sharing my inner thoughts could be a violation of the terms of service here.
If you don’t want to ignore me, that is on you. I like the company and support it. I will counter your arguments with logic and facts. Where we agree, we will agree.
Our views are obviously far apart and that is okay. You attack my views and opinions all you like and I will continue to point out the positive vibes of this stock.
Are you the company of being scammers or are you accusing FINRA and the SEC of being clowns? 🤡
That is what I have been asking her/him/they/them anonymous individual self appointed watchdog over this stock.
He/she/they/them keeps alluding that that should be questioned? Tsk,tsk it seems like a legitimate topic at first but apparently only lawyers are smart enough to provide a legitimate answer. If you ask, the logical reasoning the topic is brought up in the first place, you must be a troll.
Why did the company just recently file? What is the trade off for the delay?
Who is advantaged/disadvantaged by filing or not filing a form 211 when becoming pink current? How does it help/hurt the company?
This is a legitimate discussion offered with logical and reasonable intent.
Read the fine print from earlier post.
Fearless and forever optimistic.
Such negative vibes.