Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bill:
Here's my take on it. There will need to be another registration statement and associated quiet period. Once that's dobe, the debentures will begin converting. My guess is that the company will have a new pump campaign once the registration statement is declared effective.
I don't know how effective it will be, however. Of course, I had no idea that this last pump would be as effective as it was.
And most investors don't even see it coming. Why I can't tell.
Astonishing, isn't it?
Hound: Re: It appears to be fixed by the price at registration less 30% + 200%.
In my example at 16 cents, 146,000,000 shares divided by $6,000,000, the share price floor would be .041
Do you disagree that there is a shareprice floor?
Yes, I do. You need to read the agreement. What you are citing is the *initial* number of shares to be registered. The agreement also requires the company to register additional shares if the original registration is not enough.
This is death spiral financing. It is all there in black and white. Im not going to continue to argue with you or make any further attempts to convince you.
Do your own homework. I've done mine.
Hound: Re: Looks to me that the debentures are not floorless...
You're wrong. If the conversion price is not fixed (it's not) and the conversion price is based on a recent share price before the time of conversion (it is) then the debentures are floorless by the very definition.
See the section if the filing quoted in my previous post.
Looks like the warrants are cashless but not floorless
That's for the warrants.
The debentures which underly the financing, however, are floorless. Definitely another death spiral tranche.
...with the conversion price for any such conversion equal to the lower of (x) 70% of the volume weighted average price ("VWAP") of the Common Stock for the twenty days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date or...
If the financing is based on the same 7% convertible debentures, then they are floorless, i.e. death spiral, again.
I can't say that it has never happened, but this is the first time I have ever seen a company obtain two separate death spiral financing tranches.
Given how much money the "investors" were able to make on the last round, I suppose it should be no surprise that they would try this well again.
I thought the warrants were cashless prior to the reduction in strike price.
From the 8-K yesterday:
The warrant holders that are parties to the Amendment may, but are not required to, exercise all or any portion of their 2005 Warrants at a per share price of $0.05 at any time during the New Price Exercise Period, but cannot do so by means of a cashless exercise.
You did not answer my question. Is it possible that $2MM could produce anything that would further the development of the tech?
Sure, its possible. More likely, though is that the money will be spent on paying off the $750,000 debt and then salaries.
if you consider that in the original $3.5MM debentures deal that the company was to receive zero funds for these 40MM warrants and now potentially managed to bring in $2MM without additional dilution then it looks much better.
I'm not sure I follow. The company would have received funds for these warrants under the old deal if they were exercised. The problem is that the strike price, while not necessarily high at the time, seemed unattainable after the death spiral. The warrants were hugely discounted, returning much less to the company than they would have at the original strike price, at the cost of huge dilution (40 million shares).
Keep in mind that these warrants did not expire until 2011. Why would the company discount them so much now, if the holders and the company truly believed that the share price would go up between now and 2011? It makes no sense. There is something terribly sleazy abou this.
My guess is that this was all planned from the beginning. As you may note, I predicted this pump last year, but I did not predict the discounted warrants.
Can $2MM produce anything?
Not if you don't spend any of it on R&D. This company spent not the first dime of cash on R&D last year. Not one single penny.
Rob: Re: Especially, I theorize, if they want to do business with Rim in the future, now (?) that they know of us. Who knows? Maybe they already had an agreement with Rim but jumped the gun in using the name prematurely, not reading the NDA clearly enough???
LOL.
All opinions are read as such, some with more, some with less believability.
I'd have to put this theory in the "less believablility" catagory.
One more thing on the trademark.
RIM applied for the trademark on October 20, 2005.
This application, made by World Resource Group, was made before RIM's, on September 29, 2005:
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=doc&state=vvc264.6.6
So, it looks like this Company beat RIM to the punch, though the fields of operation are different.
gold: Re: Is there any chance
that RSMI opted to try to save a couple of bucks by pulling
another AMD fiasco and simply adding on a "TM" insignia to
their "Embarq" logo?
No. RIM did trademark "Embarq":
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=doc&state=vvc264.2.1
Edit: According to the USPTO site, "Embarq" is classified as a "recent application" and has not yet been granted trademark status.
A blast from the past...
Who could have predicted that there would be an orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme to help the warrant holders convert and dump their shares?
Your resident "self-proclaimed" "genius" "know-it-all", that's who:
Now, the suspicious part of me believes that there will be another orchestrated PR pump campaign intended to briefly drive the share price above the strike price sometime in the next year, so these holders can convert the warrants into free shares.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=6615353
LOL. This was also about the same time that our resident lovable court jester GrooveMaster was insisting that that xBox 360 had Embarq in it. Yep. I'm full of it. LOL.
Anyone that wants to see for themselves only need to dig back in my posts.
LOL. I take it back. That wasn't interesting at all...
Spoke do you want me to compile a list of all the times I proved you wrong?
That should be interesting.
You maybe correct about the intel processors and I'll go with that.
In other words, you were wrong and I was right. OK. Just as long as we understand each other.
Some people did call the Pentium I a 586. I was just using it for illustrative purposes.
In other words, you were wrong and I was right. OK. Just as long as we understand each other.
I have personally popped chips out of circuit boards for the purpose of reflashing them.
And then popped the same chip right back in again. PLCC BIOS chips are designed to be removed and replaced, as are MPUs. Controller chips for modem boards are not.
In other words, you were wrong and I was right. OK. Just as long as we understand each other.
spoke--is my recollection correct that Ray gets a bonus for
finding financing?
Yes.
Can this also explain the unusual volume?
ya think?
You may remeber the 386 intel processor then the 486....the 586.....you could just pop that chip out and replace with the new and presto new "faster"computer.
The 386 used a 132-pin socket. The 486 went to a 168-pin socket. There was no 586 (at least from Intel), but the first Pentium went to a 273-pin design, but three different sockets were used (socket 4,5, and 7). The Pentium II used a plug-in socket board, as did the Pentium III, both had different motherboard slot requirements. The Pentium 4 uses three different sockets - 423-pin, 478-pin, and 775-pin.
None of the above chips were or are interchangeable. One could never "pop" out an older generation chip and "pop" in a new one. The only way that anything resembling this could be done would be if a new chip, with the same socket and voltage requirements and the same microarchitecture, but a different speed grade were used.
I take it from Ernie's deleted message and your response that you are under the delusional belief that you could take a modem circuit board, unplug the controller and plug an FPGA in and have it work. That is, without a doubt, the most ignorant and ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
You are, of course, free to believe whatever you want.
Not shady if you are one of the "investors" who benefitted from the pump. Figure an average "pump" price of about $0.16, at 40 million shares, that adds up to a tidy little sum of about $6.4 million.
So, for lending RIM $3.5 million, these guys got this in return:
7% interest
30% discount on death spiral shares
$6.4 million on the warrants
That totals just short of $8 million that this group of "investors" made in profit out of lending RIM $3.5 million. That does not include anything they might have made on shorting the stock during the death spiral. What did all of this get RIM? Well, they spent -0- cash on R&D in FY2005. Not a single penny. The 10-K indicates that they spent $366K on R&D, but *all* of that was stock-based compensation.
So, in summary, last year the company raised $3.5 million in cash. This cost them almost $8 million in dilution to do it. Of that $3.5 million in case, they spent -0- on R&D.
Yup. Sounds like an emerging semiconductor provider to me...
Seems pretty clear to me. Here is the meat:
Pursuant to the Amendment, the Company and certain holders of the 2005 Warrants agreed to temporarily reduce the exercise price of the 2005 Warrants to $0.05 per share for a period beginning February 21, 2006 and ending at midnight, New York City time on March 10, 2006...
The "investors" were given a drastically reduced strike price for the warrants for a very short period of time that remarkably coincided with the recent pump effort.
It seems painfully obvious to me that this recent pump campaign was intended solely to make as much money as possible for the warrant holders.
I suppose the upside is this:
If I read the filing correctly, the warrants cannot be exercised "cashless". That means that these "investors" would need to actually buy the shares at $0.05 in order to sell them at the inflated pump prices. So, if my analysis is correct, the company sold about 40,000,000 shares at $0.05, thereby raising about $2 million. That also explains the proxy statement about raising the AS.
I'm not an engineer. Thats all I need to know...LOL
I have a Ph.D. in physics, a MS in Health Physics and a BS in math. If I only wanted to be an engineer, I could have saved myself about 6 extra years of school. I have earned the title "know-it-all" and I am proud of it.
I have a client of mine who works for Cisco. He is checking out RIM now, and will be chimming in very soon. He will crush you and your KNOW IT ALL ATTITUDE.
Does your friend prefer thin crust, or hand tossed?
So, doughjo. You used to be a "basher". What changed your mind? How many shares did this company give you to make you start being pumper again?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=635373
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=641811
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=645795
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=653419
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=656511
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=812570
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=812578
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=909824
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=944452
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=945442
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=997207
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1000610
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1003619
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1004036
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1004683
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1005904
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1045752
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1045978
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1046020
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1065923
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1066057
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1074013
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1074286
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1074310
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1164479
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1177325
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1185336
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1239621
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1239660
they go on and on... Try lithium, or maybe prozac. At least I'm consistent...
427: ~~~~*sigh*~~~~
Here we go again...
And you ignore my immediate question right after that with Ketch where he clarified that it was in software form and not hardware form.
I don't recall that. Just to be sure, I just went through the next few weeks of your posts after your "dinner with Ketch" and saw no such thing. Care to enlighten me?
He said that the prototype was done, and I assumed it was the FPGA. He also was speaking about asics being the size of a fingernail.
I don't believe it. You don't speak of ASICs in terms of "gates". That term is more appropriately used in reference to an FPGA.
I called NT afterwards to get his take on what was said, as well as CWH.
That's interesting, because NT, in at least two different posts, concurred with what you said and also referred to the "FPGA".
You were not at the meeting yet you arrogantly try to get people to believe that you know more about what was said than the people that were there.
Look, Sherman. I'm not telling anyone what to believe. I am commenting on a post you made and offering my thoughts and opinions about it. Disgaree with me all you want, but leave the attacks out of it (I predicted you would attack me). I referenced *your* post. Quoted *your* words. I also have cited where NT agreed with your summary and referred to the "current FPGA". Furthermore, the single most important thing on everyone's mind at that time was the impending release of the much ballyhooed, and already twice-promised FPGA, due within a few weeks. Now, after the company once again had failed to deliver on its promise, you suddenly remembered that you misunderstood what Ketch said about the single most important subject of the day.
Furthermore, after the PR regarding the "prototype" release, you were still referring to "NV Chips" when referring to the PR, despite the fact that you now claim you knew by then that there were no chips:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=643776
Two weeks later, you were still referring to the "NV chips" (and hyping a potential deal with Intel no less):
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=669192
Your revisionist history is Hogwash.
...my word can't be credible one time and not the other, just because it doesn't fit your agenda.
Interesting. The "I'm not credible so you can't use my words against me" defense. LOL.
Frankly, I have rarely found your words credible at all. For example, just a few days ago, you apparently made something up, completely out of the blue, about Greaves and Cambridge being responsible for the 20% of Embarq that made it over 20 times faster than PowerStream.
If you used your brain for something other than being obstinate, it would occur to you that no one would claim something is done one day if he was openly willing to admit it wasn't a few days later. What would be the point.
My, my. Another attack . I must be hitting a nerve. This company does a lot of things that would seem to have no point. But consider this. Only two weeks before your now infamous dinner with Brad, the company had anounced publicly that they were still on track to release the FGPA by year end. Do you remember that?
Now, let me ask you the same question. Why would this company publicly claim something one day only to openly admit it was not true only a few days later?
And you have the gall to call me obstinate. Your petty sophomoric attacks are unbecoming.
One thing I am a stickler for is accuracy...
LOL. Like your "accuracy" a few days ago regarding Greaves and Cambridge developing the 20% of Embarq that made it 20 times faster than PowerStream?
I am amazed that you, an engineer have so little respect for the same.
I'm not an engineer. However, I have regard accuracy with the utmost importance. I would venture to say that my analyses here have been *far* more accurate than yours.
Now, lay off the attacks. If you can't carry on a civil discussion, then shut up.
427: Re: I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that your memory is not very good, rather than that you are lying about what I said.
I have absolutely NO confidence in your reporting about anything Brad said 3 years ago, since you have repeatedly misrepresented things that I have said.
I kinda thought you would say that. I don't know why we have to get into this every time that I reference "the post". At any rate, for those who are new here, this is the post from 3 years ago in which you said that Ketch said the chip was done, was the size of a fingernail and had 3 million gates.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=632237
I know that you now deny that Brad said that, and I am sure you will launch into some kind of attack (again), but I never believed that you simply misunderstood those clear and obvious statements. Furthermore, NorthernTrader posted that the content of your post was what he understood too.
As for the statement that you made three years ago about the tech being a done deal and it works without about a doubt, well that was in this post:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=834068
Note that this was almost two years before the company declared the FPGA design "frozen".
I simply repeated *your* words. Are you still ready to *almost* call me a liar?
Over the years these issues had to be raised by the stockholders what is RSMI response to this?
I can't speak for anyone else, but for myself, I have found that when confronted with at least one of these issues, the company has chosen to lie about it.
In particular, I am referring to the time over 3 years ago when Ketch called me after I made a big stink on this board about the promised FPGA that never materialized. (remember, that promised FPGA was supposed to come out over 3 years ago).
Rather than producing an FPGA as promised, the company claimed to have released two prototypes that ran on laptop computers. I asked Ketch why this was done and why the FPGAs were not produced. He told me that they were fully capable of producing FPGAs, but to save costs, they were using laptop prototypes. He also told me that they would be replacing the laptops with FPGAs in a few weeks. When weeks, then months, then years went by without an FPGA, I turned to the dark side.
Our very own 427Cobra has also been lied to, though he never seems to be able to bring himself to admit it. The december before I was lied to, Cobra had dinner with Ketch and reported here that Brad said "the chip was done, had 3 million gates and was the size of a fingernail". That was over 3 years ago. Later, Cobra spoke to Brad and reported that he was told that "The tech is a done deal. It works without a doubt." Again, this was over 3 years ago. Since that bold statement about the tech being a done deal and working without a doubt, three years have passed, ANI has been abandoned, and HelloSoft was hired to either make it work, or make it look like they were making it work.
My point being that this company has a history of lying to people who ask the pointed questions. I have first-hand knowledge of that.
If they spent little on R and D why, how do they account for the money that was raised and were it went?
Its all in the filings. You can see the R&D expenditures for yourself. The single biggest expense in all of the filings has been "Compensatory elements of selling and G&A". I have absolutely no idea what that is, nor has the company explained it, but literally tens of millions of dollars have gone to that catagory, as opposed to a paltry sum spent on R&D. This is unlike any other development company that I have ever seen. When developing a new technology you spend every available penny on R&D. Thiscompany spends only a tiny fraction of the money they raise on R&D - far less than they spend on salaries. That alone is telling.
Why are other companies aligning themselves with RSMI such as Hellosoft and putting thier reps and making statements about RSMI potential if this is an "obvious shell"
What other companies? The only companies I can think of are ANI and HelloSoft. Both were paid by the company.
What are they planning on showing at the product suites?
Good question. Maybe it will be the same circuit board that they showed at the shareholder meeting almost 4 years ago.
Why would they even release a PR which forces them to produce something tangible in the near future if this was the case.
You mean like the previous PRS over the last 5 years promising FPGAs and revenues? A PR does not "force" a company to do anything. They are protected by "safe harbor".
Why would they get the US govt involved in a shell and state they were invited to show thier product, it just focuses their attention on them?
LOL. The government did not invite them to show their product. The government "invites" companies to bid on work by issuing a "request for proposal" that any company in the free world can bid on. That is how government contracting works. Believe me, I know. The fact that the company spun it as though it were some sort of private audience with GSA is further evidence of the capacity for deception by this company.
I encourage you to ask these questions directly of the company. I would, but they have long ago stopped answering my questions. I have asked those close to the company who post here to ask these questions, but they somehow either do not get asked, or the answers to not get shared here.
LOL. A few weeks ago, I said this:
I have been scratching my head thinking about how they will manage to get "nanotechnology" and "hydrogen fuel cell technology" into the next PR.
Then, I see this:
FuelCell Energy Reports First Quarter 2006 Results and Accomplishments and CECO Environmental Announces New Orders Totaling Approximately $4.75 Million
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq: FCEL), a leading manufacturer of ultra-clean and efficient electric power generation plants for commercial and industrial customers, today reported results and accomplishments for its first fiscal quarter, ended January 31, 2006. FuelCell Energy reported a net loss to common shareholders for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 of $16.7 million or $0.34 per basic and diluted share, compared to a net loss to common shareholders of $19.4 million or $0.40 per basic and diluted share in the same period of the previous year. Revenues, for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, were $5.9 million compared to $7.6 million in the prior year. CECO Environmental Corp. (Nasdaq: CECE), a leading provider of air pollution control and industrial ventilation systems announced today that it has received five (5) new orders totaling approximately $4.75 million.
Power Air Corporation (OTCBB: PWAC), an alternative fuel technology company, announced today that OTC Financial Network, a division of National Financial Communications Corp., has issued an InvestorFacts report on the Company. The detailed publication includes a profile of the Company's proprietary energy solutions, future growth strategies and investment considerations. Interested parties can view the report online at http://www.otcfn.com/pwac/report.html or call 781-444-6100 ext. 629 for reprints. Rim Semiconductor Company (OTCBB: RSMI), an emerging provider of semiconductors to the broadband telecommunications industry, today announced its 2006 Marketing Program. The market for IPTV networks in the Asia-Pacific regions, which are powered by semiconductors such as the Company's Embarq product, is expected to grow nearly 80 percent every year to US$4.2 billion between now and 2010, according to Instat.
Interestingly enough, for the conferences and forums that list exhibitors, RIM does not appear on any of the lists, i.e. they will not have sanctioned exhibits.
Why would they go to these conferences, not have an exhibit, and do "product demonstration" by invitation only?
Are you saying Rim doesnt have a finished FPGA?
Yes. Why else would they post a picture of a fake?
All that matters is the fpga's are in the hands of 2 target customers.
So they say. Are these the same two customers that the prototype "released" three years ago went to?
All companies lie.
Then this company is no exception. At least you have now admitted that they lied. That's a start. The real question is how much have they lied, now isn't it?
up 15% today closed @.189
Is that why your so upset?
I don't care what the share price is. I was saying the same thing two months ago when the share price was under 3 cents.
no spoke - i have launched no attacks against "you"
LOL.
I will continue to post what I want, when I want. I suggest you get over that. People, even if they disagree with the great iamshazzam, are entitled to post their thoughts and opinions here. This board is for adults, you should act like one.
So, you obviously don't think the Actiontec board was a fake. What's your explanation.
<spokeshave makes what he predicts will be a completely futile attempt at intelligent, adult discussion>
From you post a few days ago...
"elder - i'd like to see all of us call a truce here..."
Since then, you have launched at least a half dozen attacks against me, and I have not addressed a single post to you, nor responded to any of your posts. Not much of a man of your word, are you?
Its getting old and you're acting like a spoiled child.
Or is it your analysis that is the proof?
My analysis is proof enough for me. You, of course, don't have to believe it.
So Hellosoft is involved in a fraud as well?
I didn't say that. Best I can tell, HelloSoft didn't have anything to do with the stolen AMD art or the fake picture of the Actiontec modem board in the flyer. Since I don't know what the new board pictured in the flyer is, I can't speculate about it other than the fact that it says "HelloSoft" on it.
I truly am curious about how you would explain the fake board, and why it's picture was replaced...
If I were going to alter a circuit board to do a better job for me I would take the circuit board and make changes on it. I would not start from scratch.
Sure. Just take any old rusty chisel, chisel off the old chip, and superglue the new one into place.
I'm afraid it doesn't work that way. The board pictured in the original flyer was a board taken from a modem. The board inside the modem was specifically designed around the TI controller chip. You *cannot* simply remove the controller chip and replace it with an FPGA. It does not and cannot work that way. That is simply a fact. The board pictured in the original flyer was a fake. There can be no reasonable dispute of that fact. For further proof, note that once the fake was made public, the fake picture was removed and replaced with a different one.
Incidentally, the new picture looks suspiciously like this WLAN reference board from the HelloSoft web site. Given the differences between wireless LAN technology and DSL technology, it is still unlikely that the same board could be used for the same development effort:
Having said that, I cannot say that I can prove that the new pic is a fake. I *can* say that about the old pic.
OK. You have gone from "Just bc someone says its not a real pic doesnt make it so" to "Its just a marketing piece for a flyer."
I find it very telling that you are so willing to dismiss this fraud with simple "marketing" handwaving. The flyer had an arrow pointing to a Texas Instruments modem controller chip with the blatantly false caption "This is the FPGA that contains all of the software that runs Embarq30". How would you define fraud?
If there was nothing wrong with doing this, then why did they remove the pics?
Just bc someone says its not a real pic doesnt make it so.
Here is the pic that *used* to be featured on the RIM site:
Here is the AMD Opteron promo art that it was ripped off from:
In the spiffy PDF flyer about Embarq, they *used* to have this picture of the "prototype board" with a nice little arrow pointing to their "FPGA":
Well, it turns out that the "prototype board" was nothing more than a picture of a run-of-the-mill modem board, as seen here by this pic of the board taken from an Actiontec modem:
Since I exposed these pictures as frauds back in December, they have been removed from RIM's web site and flyer.
The pics were bogus. No doubt about it.
spokeshave are the other companys listed for real
and
do they all have real products?
I only recognize Artimi, and that's because of Cooper. I have never heard of the rest. Artimi does not have any products yet, though they claim that they have made first silicon and are currently sampling, IIRC.
If any of the listed companies have real products, then Asaiki does not carry them. None of the companies on that list have products in the Asaiki inventory:
http://www.asaiki.net/inventory/latest_ivt.xls
FWIW, I have never heard of Asaiki before, either.
dutch: Re:congradulations on both your daughter's health and your first grandchild.
Actually, its my fourth. Thanks.
y2k: Re: I don't know if you remember or not but my daughter was fighting a battle with cancer also, she just turned 18 last week and this April it will be two years since her last chemo treatment.
Yes, of course I remember. I was hoping you would chime in with news that she is doing well. I'm glad to hear it.
mag: Thanks. She's fine and cancer free. She gave us a beautiful grandson a week ago.
Got one today at my home email. Right after my post here.
"Hey spoke, still trying to f**k it up for the rest of us?
Your daughter dead yet?"
From an anonymous Yahoo account. I probably shouldn't post it here, but I think it is important for people to know just how cult-like this religion can be.
Sound familiar, anyone? The only place I have shared my e-mail address has been here.
I'm not one to make idle threats on the internet, but I will say this. I am an overweight middle aged geek, but if I find you, you'll never know what hit you. That is an iron-clad promise.
Why would Hellosoft license thier VOIP tech to a BS company with no product, it would only hurt thier sales.
No, it wouldn't. HelloSoft sells IP, and RIM bought some. It seems to me that actually helps sales.
Why would Artemis[sic] (Tom), a legititmate company with legititmate investors risk being associated with RSMI without examining thier product?
First of all, Artimi has no association whatsoever with RIM. Secondly, Cooper only serves on the board of RIM. That kind of association happens all the time.
Why would they use the US govt to promote a fraud if they are a thinly veiled shell...
Anyone can send a proposal to GSA. That press release means nothing.
Now, let me ask you a few questions:
1)What happened to the Lucent verification?
2)What happened to the first promised FPGA prototype?
3)What happened to the second promised FPGA prototype?
4)What happened to the $50 million or so that was not spent on R&D or salaries?
5)Where is the promised "open books" for TSP and the movie revenues?
6) Why did they use a picture of an AMD chip and call it Embarq?
7) Why did they show a picture of an Actiontec modem board and call it their FPGA?
8) Why were those pictures removed and replaced with different pictured once the deception was discovered?
9) Why would they use fake pictured when they could have taken pictures of the "real thing"?
I have many more, but I would really like to hear your thoughts on these first.
destiny: This is a discussion board. The attempts by you and others to stifle critical thinking, analysis and open, frank discourse can't change that.
The threats, insults, and even wishes of death for my daughter (after I foolishly shared her plight with cancer on this board), that I have received in private mail and pathetic, cowardly anonymous e-mail, that I still receive even to this day, along with your attempts at censorship only serve th strengthen my resolve.
If you looked back, and were *honest*, you would recognize that the facts and opinions that I post do not coincide, in any way, with sharepirce movement or momentum. If you are going to accuse me of posting absurd statements and half truths, then be prepared to prove it, or shut up. I noted with no surprise that you failed to call Cobra down on what was an obvious false statement intended to discredit my truthful post. I suppose it is just fine to make up lies and half-truths just so long as they favor your precious stock. Your hypocrisy is astounding.
You are certainly free to believe in this company. I have never attempted to change anyone's mind. If you are once again *honest* with yourself, you would notice and realize that. However, when I post factual material along with reasonable speculation, rather than enter the discussion like rational adults, you people ceaselessly attack me and even attack my family.
And you have the nerve to insinuate that I am less than honorable...