Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Røven fuld er næsten det samme som røven bar.
Jeg har et par stykker. Er træt af pink shit. Der sker altid et eller andet "lort".
Jeg har solgt lidt KLIC for at rejse til Sibirien. Ellers havde jeg ikke råd.
Time To Take Profits In Chip Stocks?
Posted by Eric Savitz
You might want to take some money off the table in chip stocks. That’s the advice this morning from American Technology Research analyst Doug Freedman.
He notes that of the 19 companies he follows, 14 have posted gains of 5%-25% since he upgraded the sector on April 4. (Just two of those stocks - Qimonda (QI) and Omnivision (OVTI) - have declined in the subsequent weeks.) And now, he says, they are due for a 4-6 week pause.
“We believe such rapid gains for an 8-week period likely require a cooling off period,” he writes. “We suggest that investors take profits during this pause and return to an overweight stance on any pull-back caused by seasonal booking patterns.”
Freedman advises focusing on “stock-specific stories with a PC and consumer focus in the back half of the year.” In particular, he says Intel (INTC), Nvidia (NVDA), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Micron (MU) should all benefit from strong PC and notebook demand.
Permalink | Trackback URL: http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/06/03/time-to-take-profits-in-chip-stocks/trackback/
Save & Share: Share on Facebook | Del.icio.us | Digg this | Email This
JA lortet falder fra hinanden igen.
Jeg bestiller en uges rejse til Sibirien.
Det ved jeg da godt.
Jeg skriver bare non oecd fordi man kan se det direkte i de tabeller, så må man korrigere inden i hovedet. Jeg har ikke tid til at rette i de tabeller, eller lave nogle makroer så du får lige akkurat de tal du vil have. Hvis jeg fik løn for det så gjorde jeg det, men det gør jeg ikke.
Jeg ved også godt det er fra 2006, men hvad vil du have jeg skal gøre. Jeg læser de sidste nye tal og husker 50% af dem og så interpolerer jeg oveni aktierkurserne og tænker at de er fuldstændigt fra snøvsen og vanvittige.
Jeg skriver bare 2/3 del fordi det er i det område jeg fornemmer de er. Jeg er i totalt overdrive og sidder med XXX sager indenfor mineralbranchen i sydamerika, asien og USA - usa er et uland i den sammenhæng.
- og det med 1,2 gange GDP har du fuldstændigt ret i. Har også kommenteret det for flere år siden. - men det er hvad de officielle kanaler siger og jeg tror på dem hvis de kigger på usa, men væksten i fattige lande er netop koncentreret omkring opbygning af infrastruktur og det betyder mange lastbiler, personbiler osv. Det er jo de sektorer der buldrer derudaf.
Jeg må hellere køre udenom. Det er lidt trælst, at folk skal prøve på at køre en ned altid.
Fik kun køre 50 i går og idag er det Batminton. Jeg har lyst til at finde cykeltøjet frem og så tage en lang tur nordpå eller rundt om roskilde fjord.
Det kan jeg nu nok ikke nå inden det bliver mørkt.
http://www.worldsteel.org/pictures/newsfiles/2008_Apr[1].pdf
Der er vist noget galt med link men søg selv.
http://www.worldsteel.org/
Gider "du" ikke lige lave en "lagkage" til mig, så jeg kan se produktions og forbrugsdelene.
WORLD STEEL REVIEW, May 2008
World production of crude steel in March 2008 rose by 5.8% to 119.5 million tonnes, the highest monthly total in over 15 years. The total of the 3 months to date was 340.7 million tonnes, 5.6% higher than the January to March period in 2007. However, excluding China, the total for the quarter was only 4% up on 2007.
Crude steel production in the European Union 27 fell by 2.3% in March to 18.6 million tonnes compared to March 2007, and was 1.3% down in the quarter at 53.3 million tonnes. German steel production was flat in March, and fell by 2.1% in the three months to 12.1 million tonnes. Italian production decreased by 4.2% in March, and by 0.7% in the quarter to 8.3 million tonnes. French steel production dropped by 11.4% in March, bringing the year to date total down 7.5% to 4.9 million tonnes. Spanish steel production decreased by 4% in March, although it rose by 3% in the three months to 4.7 million tonnes. UK steel production showed a slight increase of 0.7% in March, but was flat in the year to date at 3.6 million tonnes. Among the newer members of the European Union Poland showed a fall of 1.9% in the month and 4.4% in the quarter; the Czech Republic, however, was up 2.3% in the month, and 1.2% up in the quarter.
Outside the European Union, Turkish production increased by 7.5% in March, and by 10.1% in the three months to 6.9 million tonnes. Production in Serbia rose by 13.9% in the month, and by 15.1% in the quarter to 496 thousand tonnes compared to 2007.
According to ACEA, the European vehicle manufacturers association, car registrations in the 28 European countries monitored fell by 9.5% in March, and by 1.7% in the first three months of 2008 compared to 2007. Italian registrations were down 18.8% in March, with the quarter total down by 10% to 664 thousand units. In Germany, however, there was a decrease of 14.4% in March, but an increase of 2.6% in the three months to 736 thousand units. UK registrations showed an increase of 0.5% in March, although the year to date total was down 0.7% to 683 thousand units. French registrations showed a drop of 0.5% in the month, while the year to date total increased by 1.3% to 526 thousand units. In Spain registrations showed a large drop of 28% in March, bringing the quarter total down 15.3% to 348 thousand units. In contrast some of the newer EU members showed a marked increase in the quarter: Polands total was up by 19.5%, Romania was up 23.6%, Hungary was up by 3.5%, and the Czech Republic total increased by 9.7%.
In the former USSR, Russia showed an increase in steel production, up by 7.2% in the month and by 5% in the quarter to 19.2 million tonnes. In the Ukraine production only increased by 3.9% in the month, and by 3.6% in the quarter to 11.0 million tonnes. Production in Kazakhstan showed a 10% drop in March, with the three months total down by 12.2% to just under 1 mt.
Crude steel production in the USA was 8.5 million tonnes in March, an increase of 2.1%, bringing the first quarter total up 7.9% to 25.4 million tonnes. Mexican production increased by 5% in the month, with the three months total up 4.4% to 4.5 million tonnes. Canadian steel production was close behind rising by 4.8% in March and by 7.5% in the year to date to 4.4 million tonnes.
South America is dominated by Brazil where steel production increased by 6.3% in March with the year to date 8.1% higher at 8.6 million tonnes. In Argentina production was 6.9% up in the month bringing the year to date to 1.4 million tonnes, an increase of 11.4% on the first quarter of 2007. Venezuelan steel production, on the other hand, fell by 7% in March, and by 3.5% in the three months to under 1.3 million tonnes.
In Africa, the South African three month total fell by 3.6% to 2.2 million tonnes, while the Egyptian total jumped by 23.7% to 1.8 million tonnes. In the Middle East Iranian steel production rose by 8.6% in March, although the first quarter total was down 2.5% to 2.5 million tonnes, while Saudi Arabian steel production increased by 24% in March, bringing the three months total to 1.3 million tonnes, an increase of 21.9%.
The five major Asian countries for which monthly crude steel production data are available showed increased production in both March and the year to date except for South Korea. Chinese steel production continues to rise with an 11.5% increase in March and 8.6% in the quarter to 124.9 million tonnes, more than twice the Japanese and US totals added together. Japans production rose 5.1% in March, with first quarter production up by 4.4% to 30.8 million tonnes. Indian steel production in March was only 2.2% higher, with the three months total up 6.1% to 14.3 million tonnes, ahead of both Germany and South Korea. Production in South Korea decreased by 1.4% in March, with the year to date up 5% to 13.2 million tonnes. Taiwanese production rose by 12.2% in the month, bringing the first quarter total to 5.7 million tonnes, a rise of 11.5% on January to March 2007.
Chinese exports of steel in March rose by one million tonnes from the low February total to 4.1 million tonnes, just below the January total. There were significant increases in the export of hot rolled plate and hot rolled wide coil, and the tonnage of hot rolled bars exported more than doubled to its highest monthly total ever at over 450 thousand tonnes. The huge increase in bar exports was in alloy bars which accounted for 83% of the bar exports in the first 3 months of 2008. Far Eastern countries accounted for 78% of Chinas hot rolled bar exports, 84% of Chinas hot rolled plate exports, and 90% of its hot rolled coil exports.
Chinese imports of iron ore have been rising and reached a peak of 38.2 million tonnes in February 2008. China buys over 80% of its iron ore from 3 countries: Australia, India and Brazil, and in the first 3 months of 2008 Australia supplied 38% of the total imported, with an average value of about US$100 per tonne, followed by India supplying 23% at about US$160 per tonne, and then Brazil which supplied 22% at about US$136 per tonne. The remainder of Chinas iron ore imports was supplied by a further 28 countries.
Chinese imports of steel also rose in March 2008 to over 1.5 million tonnes, reaching their highest level since April 2007. Coated sheet and strip accounted for 27% of the total imported at 417 thousand tonnes, followed by CR at 389 thousand tonnes, 25% of the total. Three countries accounted for 84% of total steel imports in 2008: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Non OECD sidder på omtrent 40% af olieforbruget med vækstrater - gætter jeg på beregnet efter IEA på 0,7x GDP growth.
Det er bare en tommelfingerregel. Hvis deres vækst målt i GDP i snit er..(jeg har ikke kigget længe) 6% så vokser deres andel af olieforbruget med 4% - og vi har nogenlunde 0 vækst hos os eller sådan på en sjus 2,5% i alt i gennemsnit.
http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2007/STAGING/local_assets/downloads/spreadsheets/statistical_review_full_report_workbook_2007.xls
Kigger man på stål og cement så bruger de meget mere end I-landene.
Hvor f*** har du været henne?
De fattige lande sidder jo 2/3'del af omsætningen af stort set alle råvarer og når de har vækstrater på 10-15% bør man ikke bekymre sig en skid om USA's og EUR's +/- 1 til 3%.
UN chief: food production must rise 50 percent by 2030
Tuesday June 3, 7:21 am ET
By Frances D'Emilio and Ariel David, Associated Press Writers
UN chief says food production must rise 50 percent by 2030 to meet increasing demand
ROME (AP) -- World food production must rise by 50 percent by 2030 to meet increasing demand, U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon told world leaders Tuesday at a summit grappling with hunger and civil unrest caused by food price hikes.
The secretary-general told the Rome summit that nations must minimize export restrictions and import tariffs during the food price crisis and quickly resolve world trade talks.
"The world needs to produce more food," Ban said.
The Rome-based U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization is hosting the three-day summit to try to solve the short-term emergency of increased hunger caused by soaring prices and to help poor countries grow enough food to feed their own.
In a message read to the delegates, Pope Benedict XVI said "hunger and malnutrition are unacceptable in a world which, in reality, has sufficient production levels, the resources, and the know-how to put an end to these tragedies and their consequences."
The Pope told the world leaders that millions of people at threat in countries with security concerns were looking to them for solutions.
Ban said a U.N. task force he set up to deal with the crisis is recommending the nations "improve vulnerable people's access to food and take immediate steps to increase food availability in their communities."
That means increasing food aid, supplying small farmers with seed and fertilizer in time for this year's planting seasons, and reducing trade restrictions to help the free flow of agricultural goods.
"Some countries have taken action by limiting exports or by imposing price controls," Ban said. "They only distort markets and force prices even higher."
The increasing diversion of food and animal feed to produce biofuel, and sharply higher fuel costs have also helped to shoot prices upward, experts say.
The United Nations is encouraging summit participants to start undoing a decades-long legacy of agricultural and trade policies that many blame for the failure of small farmers in poor countries to feed their own people.
Wealthy nations' subsidizing their own farmers makes it harder for small farmers in poor countries to compete in global markets, critics of such subsidies say. Jim Butler, the FAO's deputy director-general, said in an interview ahead of the gathering that a draft document that could be the basis for a final summit declaration doesn't promise to overhaul subsidy policy.
Congress last month passed a five-year farm bill heavy on subsidies, bucking White House objections that such aid in the middle of a global food crisis wasn't warranted.
The head of the summit's U.S. delegation, Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer, insisted on Monday that biofuels will contribute only 2 or 3 percent to a predicted 43 percent rise in prices this year.
Figures by other international organizations, including the International Monetary Fund, show that the increased demand for biofuels is contributing by 15-30 percent to food price increases, said Frederic Mousseau, a policy adviser at Oxfam, a British aid group.
"Food stocks are at their lowest in 25 years, so the market is very vulnerable to any policy changes" such as U.S. or European Union subsidizing biofuels or mandating greater use of this energy source, Mousseau said.
Brazil is another large exporter of biofuels, and President Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva was expected to defend biofuels at the summit.
Several participants won't even be talking to each other at the summit.
Australia's foreign minister decried as "obscene" Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's participation in the summit. The longtime African leader has presided over the virtual transformation of his country from former breadbasket to agricultural basket case.
Zimbabweans increasingly are unable to afford food and other essentials with agriculture paralyzed by land reform and the world's highest rate of inflation.
The Dutch ministry for overseas development pledged to "ignore" Mugabe during the summit.
EU sanctions against Mugabe because of Zimbabwe's poor human rights record forbid him from setting foot in the bloc's 27 nations, but those restrictions don't apply to U.N. forums.
Jewish leaders and some Italian politicians were among those denouncing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's attendance at the meeting. On Monday, Ahmadinejad repeated his call for the destruction of Israel, which is also participating in the summit.
Ahmadinejad was scheduled to give a summit news conference Tuesday afternoon.
Schafer, asked about the presence of the Zimbabwean and Iranian leaders, told reporters in Rome that the two were welcome to attend the summit, but that U.S. delegates would not be meeting with them.
Synes scenarie 1 ser ud til at fortsætte, men..
Den sidste fjer ovenpå, så vælter læsset.
Knækker det, så sker det nok før man når at opdage det og så er det for sent. Aktierne er nu faldet så meget..men de kan falde mere.
Gemini falder, så det er om at nappe i den nu?.
Der kan I bare se...min semicykel jubler derudaf.
+2,33%. Jeg har altså 2,33 millioner i overskud på den idag.
SMTX stiger igen.
Jeg har 100 millioner i den, så jeg sidder og hepper på de næste 2 cents...
Nu smutter jeg ud på cyklen igen.
Jeg har chips i min cykelcomputer så..!!
Collapse in Demand
For Large SUVs Leaves
Owners in a Bind
Tumbling Values on Trade-ins, Used Vehicles
Means Many Loans Are 'Underwater'
June 2, 2008
Most people who buy a new car or truck don't think they are making a risky bet on the commodity futures market. But they are. Just ask someone who's trying to unload a large sport-utility vehicle purchased in the last two or three years.
The market for large, second-hand SUVs is going through its own version of the mortgage market's meltdown -- and for some of the same reasons. GM's Hummer H2s and Chevy Tahoes and Toyota's Sequoias were adjuncts to a lifestyle built on cheap energy. Because gas was cheap, living farther from work in order to buy a larger home in a former corn field (or desert) was a reasonable economic decision. Shuttling 100 miles a day from school to work to mall to Costco was a trivial expense -- $10 or so when gas was $1.50 a gallon. You could spend more supplying all your passengers with 20-ounce bottles of Coca-Cola.
[Discuss] JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Readers, over to you: If you had a big SUV or pickup would you be getting rid of it now? Discuss.
Gasoline at $4 a gallon has burst the super-sized American lifestyle. The proof: The fizz has gone out of sales of those 20-ounce sodas, in part because after the shock of filling up at the pump, people aren't in a mood to buy anything else at the quickie mart.
More seriously, lots of big homes far from town suddenly aren't worth what's owed on them, and the SUVs that ferried people around the sprawl are also "underwater" on their loans.
About 36% of the people who tried to trade in a large SUV in May owed more on the truck than it was worth, according to data from the Power Information Network. That's up from just under 33% a year ago. (It's worse for large pickups. Recent PIN data suggests 40% of large pickups traded during May fetched less than the loan balance.)
A three-year-old large SUV today is worth about $2,000 to $3,000 less at trade-in than a three-year-old large SUV would have been in 2007, before gas prices began to soar, according to Marc Cannon of AutoNation Inc., the largest U.S. auto retailer. A three-year-old Chevy Tahoe that might have fetched $19,700 in September 2007, he says. Today, a three-year-old Tahoe might be worth $16,400 at trade-in.
In other words, folks who bought a big SUV in 2005 are discovering that they were making a bet that oil prices would remain stable. They were wagering $30,000 to $40,000, not the billions certain U.S. auto makers stand to lose from making a similar wager. But the pain of losing that bet is still real. There hasn't been such a significant collapse in demand for a class of vehicles since the oil embargoes and inflation of the 1970s slaughtered muscle cars.
[Unsold 2008 Super Duty pickup trucks sit at a Ford dealership]
Associated Press
Unsold 2008 Super Duty pickup trucks sit at a Ford dealership in the south Denver suburb of Littleton, Colo., last month.
For the past several weeks, I have passed an increasingly common sign of the times: a Hummer H2 parked at the front of the owner's driveway with a "For Sale" sign in the window. I don't know the seller's motives, but it's doubtful they'll get what they want for the truck, given that Hummer dealers have a glut of unsold new vehicles that will probably leave their lots at fire-sale prices.
Within the past few days, a number of experts in the used-car market have recommended that owners of large SUVs should probably just hang on to their rigs rather than sell into the current collapse.
"If you've got one two- to three-years-old and you're working on a five-year loan, you will be upside down," says Jack Nerad of Kelley Blue Book/KBB.Com. "That's exacerbated by the fact the dealer doesn't want that vehicle right now. It's going to be an ugly scene."
Mr. Nerad's reasoning is that right now could be a trough for large SUV demand. Winter usually brings an uptick in demand for four-wheel-drive vehicles, which would make late model used SUVs more desirable for people who want them.
It's true, as Mr. Nerad points out, that the incremental expense of driving a large SUV for another year -- as opposed to buying a Ford Focus -- is almost certainly less than the financial hit a consumer will take trading in a big SUV right now.
A Toyota Sequoia costs about $1,700 more to drive for a year than a Ford Focus, based on the government's mileage calculations and average gasoline prices of $3.79 per gallon. Even adjusting the calculation to $4 a gallon, you'd likely lose less in a year by keeping the big rig.
This is a perennial debate in financial markets: When do you close out a losing hand? No one would or should pay attention to what a journalist has to say about that. (If we knew….)
The bind of what large SUV owners should do with their rides illustrates the bigger problem confronting the U.S. car business. Vehicle strategies -- the mix of small and large, cars and trucks -- take years to develop. Consumers, likewise, buy vehicles they intend to keep for several years -- as evidenced by the fact that so many people choose to take five- or six-year car loans. The economic environment that makes a vehicle choice look rational can change far more quickly.
What remains to be seen is how consumers will choose to cope with the fallout.
Some big SUV owners may decide that their big truck is worth keeping, provided it is used for tasks only a big truck can do -- such as hauling a trailer. A big SUV that is driven only about 8,000 miles a year costs no more to fuel than a Ford Focus driven 15,000 miles a year. Daily commuting in a big SUV never really made a lot of sense. But now, high gas prices make it economical to get the right tool for that job.
The collapse of the SUV market presents a huge challenge for auto makers. The financial problem is well documented. But this goes beyond red ink. Auto makers will have to reorient their marketing. To sell SUVs, car makers convinced consumers that they needed one vehicle capable of performing every conceivable task from climbing a cliff to negotiating left turns across traffic to get to Nordstroms.
Now, auto makers will have to tell consumers they need a number of vehicles designed for specialized tasks – the SUV for the family vacation, the Mini or the Honda Fit for the slog to work, the luxury sedan for the night out with business associates.
It will be a tough sell. But they may find that many customers are already ahead of them.
Hvad er problemet.
Dårlig kvalitet kan købes overalt og det er ikke noget stort problem at lave noget af bedre kvalitet. Det koster og så længe folk køber det, så behøver de ikke lave det bedre.
Pris og kvalitet. Mange gange så kan noget skrammel dække behovet og så behøver man ikke lave det bedre.
Han kørte forresten sammen med Pia Kjærsgård.
Hun var nok ude for at samle stemmer.
Jeg overhalede Sailor i Humleore ved Ringsted, men han så mig nok ikke. En kæmpe orkan rev ham ned i krøften netop som jeg passerede.
Han ligger der nok endnu.
Det glemte jeg, men er også smurt helt ind i salt og det virker sikkert lige så godt.
Jeg har lige kigget.
Eftersom jeg sidder i cykelshorts, så har jeg ingen lommer foran, men mine lommer bagpå er meget store.
Hygge. Landevejene lokker.
Der er ikke noget slowdown.
Der er et SLOWUP. Det betyder at man skal rende dobbelt så hurtigt.
Small PCs big news at Computex as slowdown looms
Sun Jun 1, 2008 3:00am EDT Email | Print | Share| Reprints |
TAIPEI, June 1 (Reuters) - Smaller, low-cost PCs are likely to be at the top of the shopping list for technology buyers gathering in Taipei this week for the world's second largest computer fair, as an economic slowdown in the United States forces consumers to cut back on spending.
Shoppers are feeling the pinch from rocketing fuel costs and rising prices, and in the United States the subprime crisis has left lenders less willing to hand over credit, leaving some consumers reluctant to buy new expensive personal computers and gadget heavy mobile phones.
Cheaper, low-cost PCs, such as Asustek Computer Inc's (2357.TW: Quote, Profile, Research) Eee computer, aimed at emerging markets and buyers of additional computers, may keep growth on track for many computer and component makers.
These PCs, many with longer battery lives and wireless connection features, will share the stage with a line of eco-friendly computers with slimmer, energy-efficient displays and solar power systems, designed to cut power consumption as oil prices soar and consumers seek ways to reduce their environmental impact.
"We don't have deep pockets now," said Kevin Chung, manager at Taiwan's Jih Sun Investment Consulting.
"We really have to watch closely on the buying interest because that is going to be a signal on how the recovery's strength will be in the second half."
Asustek Computer, which makes the runaway success Eee PC, will display new, wider-screen models that allow users to do everything from storing video clips in shock-proof flash memory and surfing the Web in coffee shops.
Acer Inc (2353.TW: Quote, Profile, Research), Taiwan's most famous PC brand, will also test the water by introducing similar low-cost PCs as it expand into fast-growing emerging markets, including China and India.
Det er fint. Der er meget derude af dårlig kvalitet, men man kan også finde noget, der er lavet godt.- eller hjælpe ens leverandører til at opnå det rigtige kvalitet kan man også.
Det er jo nemt, at lave et joint venture - eller samarbejde, hvor man f.eks sørger for at de får de rigtige maskiner, så de kan opfylde de krav man har.
Resten er faktisk mere af praktisk art. Hvordan får man tingene fragtet ud til havnene på nemmeste facon. Floderne er typisk vigtige. Yangsee..osv. Det er nemmest at finde leverandører tæt på floderne. Skal man længere væk, så bliver det for besværligt, hvis det er store godsmængder eller tungt gods.
Det går fint.
De fleste motorcykler idag bruger næsten lige så meget benzin som de fleste biler og så har de flere hestekræfter.
20-25 kilometre pr. liter, det er absolut ikke imponerende.
http://www.motorcyclefuelconsumption.com/
Pas nu på ellers bliver der ballade igen.
De kommer forbi fra afdelingen og pærer møjet op som dengang da bønderne brændte hekse.
Jeg sover idag, så jeg får ikke skrevet noget.
Den her er billig og faldet meget. Til Zailors information så har G. Soros også købt den og hvis der er nogen der risikovillig med høj betaaktier så er det ham. Sikke et tab.
http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Event=WAT&Ordering=Added&purv_id=16393&at=1&Symbol=SCSS
Du er en psykopat.
Skrid.
PIS AF.
Jeg er ikke imponeret over stigningerne de seneste måneder og det kan da godt være det falder igen.
Så har vi haft et bearmarkede rally og så får de ret. Ulven kommer. Gør de ikke altid det.
Nasdaq oppe med 4,6% på en måned det er nu fint.
Man får nu ret meget for ens danske kroner i øjeblikket derovre.
Jeg kan nu ikke se nogen grund til at man ikke skulle kunne trække en skrå streg under det her chart og så regne med at det fortsætter skråt opad, men med laverer stigningstaker end fra 1975 til 2000.
Det er også lidt svært at købe/sælge aktier i markedet med det tempo de støttelinier og modstandslinier brydes.
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EIXIC#chart1:symbol=^ixic;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined
Væksten er bare ikke i us.
Imorgen får vi solskin og 40 grader.
Såfremt det ikke blæser fra vest eller det sner eller regner.
Såfremt det regner risikerer vi tordenskyller for sydøst der trækker op over dokkerbanken med mulighed for hedebølger inden klokken 14:00.
Det er forfærdeligt at læse og ...nå ja han har et job men det er da også positivt.
-----------------
Jeg har i hvertfald ondt i røven - det er nedtrendsmønsteret der har klemt sig ind imellem mine boller og som klemmer godt til.
Volapyk.
NASDAQ analyse
30. maj 2008 af Peter Jensen
NASDAQ COMPOSITE INDEX fortsætter optrenden på kort sigt med afsæt og gør et godt forsøg på at opløse sidste uges stærke advarsel om top. En lukkekurs over 2444 i dag virker nu realistisk, hvilket vil neutralisere sidste uges topsignal i form af ugentlig ’key-reversal’. Der skal dog et mere afgørende brud over kortsigtet modstand i 2507, 200 dages gl. gennemsnit i 2514 og 60 i adfærdsmodellen for at vise opadgående styrke. Den vigtige skillelinie i det langsigtede billede er placeret et niveau højere i 2568, hvor lukkekurs over i dag også vil signalere, at den langsigtede nedtrend er under vending. I så fald vil det åbne for senere test af 2676 og 2007 toppen i 2861. Foreløbig er risikoen på nedsiden dog fortsat tilstede. Allerede brud under 2487 vil give advarsel om, at indexet senere kan presse hårdt på mandagens bund i 2430. Denne støtte skal brydes for at give større sikkerhed for en fast top i 2552 på baggrund af et afsluttet topmønster. Lukkekurs under 2430 vil være stærk udgangspunkt til at accelerere nedturen videre under 50 dages gl. gennemsnit i 2400 til objektiv i 2315 og på sigt endnu lavere.
Konklusion: Indexet skal hurtig tage afsæt under 2507, før brud under 2430 for at sætte den langsigtede nedtrend i styring. Lukkekurs over 2568 vil være positiv.
Er du sikker. Der er computerchips i de motorer idag.
- og tryk på for de søfolk er helt vilde.
VDSI- ikke så god som dell men den har jeg i det mindste.
http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Event=WAT&Ordering=Added&purv_id=18875&at=1&Symbol=VDSI
Contraheringen af nye motorer til skibsfremdrivning.
Hørte rygter fra mine "forretningsforbindelser" og Hillary Clinton at deres orderindgang var faldet fra 4000 til 2000 stk.
Hvor meget jeg skal lægge i det og hvilke tidsrammer det drejer sig om kan jeg godt være i tvivl om.
Jeg har ikke adgang til Lloyds register mere.
Consumers' mood at 28-year low in May: U.Mich
Friday May 30, 9:56 am ET
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Consumer confidence fell to a 28-year low in May as inflation expectations soared, according to a survey released on Friday that presents a dilemma for the Federal Reserve.
The Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers said the final reading in May for its index of confidence fell to 59.8 from April's 62.6, slightly above the median expectation of 59.5 in a Reuters survey of economists.
May's reading was the lowest since 58.7 in June 1980 but it was slightly higher than the preliminary reading of 59.5 published earlier this month.
However, the improvement was marginal and the report still paints a troubling picture, with one-year inflation expectations surging to 5.2 percent -- the highest since February 1982 -- from 4.8 percent in April.
Worse yet, five-year inflation expectations jumped to 3.4 percent, the highest since April 1995. In April this year they were at 3.2 percent.
The inflation measures challenge the Fed's view that soaring commodity prices have not yet led to an increase in long-term expectations for price growth. They also take the shine off encouraging inflation data earlier on Friday.
The government's core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy prices, showed underlying inflation slowed on a monthly basis in April, even though it remains above the Fed's perceived comfort zone on an annual measure.
The report heightens worries that the United States could be entering a period of stagflation like the late 1970s and early 1980s, characterized by a sluggish economy and accelerated price growth.
DELL: Det ser godt ud Nt.
I make dodoo on your woodooo.
ETFC to da moon, big doodoo.
Tror du ikke det vil brede sig???
Ligesom sommerfuglen der slår med vingerne i New York og derved skaber en gigantisk tyfon udfor Taiwan.
Det tror jeg helt sikkert er rigtigt, men det kan man bare ikke måle ved at kigge på sommerfuglen.
Der kommer nok en tyfon før eller senere, men det er nok nemmere at kigge på Taiwan og der går det jo godt.
Sorry forkert link.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=VDSI
SMTX synes den ser fin ud på chartet.
http://www.sexaben.dk/daybabe/
Navios Maritime 1Q profit falls, misses views
Thursday May 29, 10:08 am ET
Navios Maritime Holdings 1st-qtr profit falls, misses views, as costs offset higher revenue
NEW YORK (AP) -- Greek shipping and logistics company Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. said Thursday its first-quarter earnings fell 4 percent, missing Wall Street's expectations, as soaring costs offset sales that more than tripled from a year earlier.
Shares slid $1.15, or 8.6 percent, to $12.25 in morning trading.
The company earned $14.2 million, or 13 cents per share, compared with a year-ago profit of $14.8 million, or 13 cents per share.
Navios Maritime had about 110.7 million shares outstanding in the 2008 first quarter, compared with about 82.9 million in the same period in 2007.
Revenue more than tripled to $338.3 million, from $101.1 million a year earlier. The company attributed surging sales to higher vessel rates and increased fleet utilization.
Analysts expected profit of 25 cents per share on revenue of $113.3 million, according to a poll by Thomson Financial.
Navios Maritime said time charter, voyage and port terminal expenses surged to $293.7 million, from $60.4 million a year earlier. Depreciation and amortization expense more than doubled to $13.6 million.
Oilservice: ..Nææ det er det vel ikke.
Jeg har rigeligt i dem synes jeg.
Mine AMD'ere stiger ikke, ETFC stiger ikke men..alt andet end oil...stiger så det er en fin dag.
Jeg synes nu oilservice stiger, men jeg køber også altid de forkerte for sent. http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EOSX
Derfor er det rart at købe lidt KLIC og tech igen. Man kender dem lidt bedre.
Bulk stiger igen en del - drys bla. omkring 9%.