Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
RDSH is one of only two that I'm holding long term.
But this is the one that I'm most excited about. You can easily tell that by my post history lol.
It's hard to wait for news, but the DD that I've done and posted has definitely made me not even consider jumping out of this one. Just take a look at all they've done to bring this back to a fully current and reporting company.
Let's just give them time to get the job done.
Haha. Well, I'm personally hoping for a dip to grab some more cheap, but I'll take what I can get.
This looks promising and I am hoping for some good news soon.
Thankfully it's only been about a month since we've gotten something. That's still pretty good for OTC.
The only ones that put out a lot of PRs are the ones that put out a whole bunch of LOIs or big plan announcements that usually don't come to fruition.
This is just my opinion, but I think these guys are keeping quiet until they actually have something done.
Of course, we all would still like some news. Until then, I'll keep looking up and posting all the information I can find about the company and it's management.
If anyone has an issue with communication, definitely email, or better yet, call the company and talk to them. Even if they can't give out any good information, you can at least let them know that as a shareholder, you'd like an update soon. I've communicated with the CEO in the past and he seems like a pretty straightforward guy.
Is there news? I'm not seeing any yet.
EVEN MORE RDSH DD
Here's the links I've compiled so far showing the background some of our management here. It includes names like Raytheon, NASA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy, and Texas A&M University.
It also shows patents that our CEO/Founder, Jon Leonard and Co-Founder/Chief Engineer, Matt Staker have been granted.
Jon N. Leonard, PhD
A Mars Colonization Approach that was submitted to The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-6135
List of all Patents associated with Dr. Jon N. Leonard
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/jon-n-leonard
Raytheon Newsletter showing that Dr Leonard had received patent through Raytheyon:
http://www.raytheon.com/news/technology_today/archive/2010_2.pdf
(pg 55:
JON N. LEONARD
JAMES SMALL
4490433 Mass spectrometer for entrained particles, and method for measuring masses of the particles)
5th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2006)
http://ronaldazuma.com/papers/ISMAR06_final.pdf
Shows him as attendee at the 2011 systems engineering research center annual research review
http://www.sercuarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Attendee-List.pdf
Joel Sercel, PhD
NASA SBIR 2015 Proposal
Demonstration of "Optical Mining" For Excavation of Asteroids and Production of Mission Consumables
http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/15/sbir/phase1/SBIR-15-1-H1.01-9278.html
Seminar given by Dr. Sercel at University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy
https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/colloquia/abstracts15A/sercel.html
Links showing that Dr. Sercel's proposal was selected by NASA for study under the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a program that aims to turn science fiction into science fact through the development of pioneering technologies.
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/05/08/niac/
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/niac-2015-phase-i-and-phase-ii-selections
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/apis-asteroid-provided-in-situ-supplies-100mt-of-water-from-a-single-falcon-9
Seminar at Texas A&M University
https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/2154178/SERCEL-02122015-AESS-Announcement.pdf
Link showing Dr. Sercel quoted in article about NASA's Asteroid Initiative and talking about ICS Associates Honey Bee project
http://spacenews.com/37559commercial-firms-push-alternative-approaches-for-nasa-asteroid-initiative/
Article about his Asteroid Mining business model
http://www.space.com/30582-asteroid-mining-water-propulsion.html
Matthew Staker
List of all Patents associated with Matthew Staker
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/matthew-staker
Matthew Staker was founder/chief technologist in VisualSoftware, which was acquired by Micrografx for approximately $17 million (inflation adjusted)
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/MICROGRAFX+COMPLETES+ACQUISITION+OF+VISUAL+SOFTWARE,+INC.-a018157203
Matthew Staker - New Image Industries, Inc
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=291000
SC 14D1/A for DENTSPLY acquisition of New Image Industries, Inc
http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrv.8Je.htm#1stPage
Article about New Image Industries, Inc's "The New Image 610 Landscape Design System", mentioning Matt Staker
http://landscapeonline.com/research/article/9460
"The 610 Landscape Design System dates from 1984, with the research and marketing of the successful NIII ‘hair salon’ system. At the time John Halloran, a successful physicist began researching the system. Later he was to team up with Bob Garavitch, a businessman who has worked for Revlon and other cosmetic firms, to finalize studies on the hair salon system to bring it to market. With the help of Matt Staker, an imaginative programmer, the imaging system became a reality."
SRI’s Center for Vision Technologies under Mike Piacentino’s leadership worked with Jon in the development of the MANTIS soldier imaging system for the US Army, under a $40 million DARPA program that Jon defined and managed while at Raytheon.
Some proof that they've worked together before:
Dr. Leonard talking about MANTIS in 2006.
http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=us-recoups-nighttime-primacy
Mike Piacentino on MANTIS
http://archive.defensenews.com/print/article/20090301/C4ISR02/903010305/Through-haze-smoke-night
Mike Piacentino profile on SRI
https://www.sri.com/about/people/michael-piacentino
Share Structure:
A/S: 3,000,000,000
O/S: 2,989,933,770
Float: 530,213,651
Restricted shares own by Insiders/Management: 2,459,720,119 or 82.2% of O/S
Share Structure has remained same since 2013. NO issuance of new shares to acquire Click Evidence.
601,973,223 TOTAL volume since RDSH announced intent to acquire Click Evidence, now known as Tautachrome (4/27/2015)
427,238,537 TOTAL volume from announcement to acquisition finalized (5/21/2015)
ONLY 174,734,686 TOTAL volume in the last 5+ months since acquisition finalized.
So, since the acquisition was finalized, only 1/3 of the total float has changed hands. AT THE VERY MINUMUM, shareholders of at least 2/3 of the float refused to sell from the Acquisition date to the run up of 441% to the high of .039 and beyond to the present day.
Even since the day of the high of .039, only 9,689,150 (1.8% of float) sold. That's FAR from a massive selloff or people running for the exit.
Yes, the fact that it came back down to settle in the 2s does mean there is a lack of bid support to maintain the highs. HOWEVER it also means that VERY few are willing to let go of their shares.
Turth be told, a lack of bid support is bound to happen when there is a sudden run up of over 400% on only 28,973,064 volume (5.4% of float) and no news. Less people will want to buy at a higher price when they are hoping for a pullback. It needed to settle down.
If you ignore all those that flipped for profit throughout the entire run up since 9/17/2015, and factor in all those that traded after the high, you can only expect MAYBE 19,283,914 shares to be sold by those that bought since this run began.
If you do factor in shares that had exchanged hands multiple times by traders flipping for profit, it is likely that there are FAR fewer shares left that could be likely to be sold by those that bought in the range of .007-.023(the current price). And we already know that there are still new investors here that bought above a penny that are holding millions for a far higher price. That is yet another thing you would have to factor in to the equation.
At the end of the day, considering that, as of yet, AT LEAST 93% have not taken any profits since the current run, it's safe to assume that it's actually FAR more than 2/3 of the float that is locked up tight.
Man... using simple math and simple logic can be quite fun!
Disclaimer: All information of volume traded was found via the below link and calculated by myself.
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/rdsh/interactive-chart
SRI’s Center for Vision Technologies under Mike Piacentino’s leadership worked with Jon in the development of the MANTIS soldier imaging system for the US Army, under a $40 million DARPA program that Jon defined and managed while at Raytheon.
Some proof that they've worked together before:
Dr. Leonard talking about MANTIS in 2006.
http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=us-recoups-nighttime-primacy
Mike Piacentino on MANTIS
http://archive.defensenews.com/print/article/20090301/C4ISR02/903010305/Through-haze-smoke-night
Mike Piacentino profile on SRI
https://www.sri.com/about/people/michael-piacentino
If you're worried that Dr Leonard is throwing their names around without permission, ask them:
https://www.sri.com/contact
8 months? Management took over 5 months ago.
Take a look at my stickied post. Shares are locked up. And this has far more eyes on it now after this recent climb. If it does drop in the penny range, which would still put it at a pretty good market cap, it should be fine because more will be willing to buy in at that range, anyways, because they were hesitant at the higher prices.
This isn't something that's going to drop down into the trip 0s and then to no bid.
Being quiet for TOO long is an issue, but it's only been a month since last filing.
It takes longer than that to close on a house.
The current management doesn't put out any fluff and waits until whatever they're working on is done.
But like I said, if you're concerned, let them know.
Destroying share price and destroying the company are two different things.
Their first priority is building the business, not putting out PRs or whatnot to battle MMs.
The share price going down won't phase any of the insiders as long as they know they're pushing forward. The stock is already in the market; they don't have to try and sell it, so putting out PRs if they don't have actual news yet would only benefit us. But concentrating on getting the product finished sooner will benefit all of us much more.
I'd like news as well, but things can take time. I'm sure we've all been in those plays where they push out a bunch of fluff PRs with LOIs that never actually get followed through on because they were way too premature.
If you are truly concerned, call or email them. It's also possible that Dr. Leonard hasn't been thinking about that kind of thing because he's not used to publicly traded companies as click evidence was previously a private company.
That still didn't explain anything about how a hidden ask size means shorting.
Hidden ask sizes seem to be used when one wants someone to buy at the ask, but don't want to cause fear by putting large number up.
It would make more sense to me for shorters to sell to the bid or stack large amounts at the ask.
Am I still not getting it? Those links didn't seem to explain anything more about how hidden ask size means shorting.
10k ask at 8% up from open is something to fear?
I don't see how shorters would gain by that.
I guess I'm just not that smart when it comes to MM shorting. Can you or anyone else explain?
It does kinda resemble it.
Haha! Exactly!
O/S has nothing to do with why it ran up or didn't hold its high of .039
Over 82% of the O/S is owned and restricted by insiders/management.
The remaining float, which is the only freely tradable shares that we should care about, is 530 million, or less than18% of O/S.
The recent run to 039 was done on less than 30 million volume. Since then, there's been less than 10 million volume (before today).
No worries of massive sell off. The VAST majority of shares are locked tight. If so many want to sell, why have so few sold in the last 5+ months since it first ran up due to Tautachrome acquisition?
Only 175 million volume since May 21.
Just based on that math and excluding any possibility of shares trading hands multiple times, 2/3 of the float has been locked tight for 5+ months.
So like I said... total O/S means nothing!
Know what you own! RDSH!
My calculations based on the last 6 months of trading and the changes in the company.
Share Structure:
A/S: 3,000,000,000
O/S: 2,989,933,770
Float: 530,213,651
Restricted shares own by Insiders/Management: 2,459,720,119 or 82.2% of O/S
NO change of share structure since 2013. NO issuance of new shares to acquire Click Evidence.
601,973,223 TOTAL volume since RDSH announced intent to acquire Click Evidence, now known as Tautachrome (4/27/2015)
427,238,537 TOTAL volume from announcement to acquisition finalized (5/21/2015)
ONLY 174,734,686 TOTAL volume in the last 5+ months since acquisition finalized.
So, since the acquisition was finalized, only 1/3 of the total float has changed hands. AT THE VERY MINUMUM, shareholders of at least 2/3 of the float refused to sell from the Acquisition date to the run up of 441% to the high of .039 and beyond to the present day.
Even since the day of the high of .039, only 9,345,085 (1.7% of float) sold. That's FAR from a massive sell off.
Yes, the fact that it came back down to settle in the 2s does mean there is a lack of bid support to maintain the highs. HOWEVER it also means that VERY few are willing to let go of their shares.
Turth be told, a lack of bid support is bound to happen when there is a sudden run up of over 400% on only 28,973,064 volume (5.4% of float) and no news. Less people will want to buy at a higher price when they are hoping for a pullback. It needed to settle down.
If you ignore all those that flipped for profit throughout the entire run up since 9/17/2015, and factor in all those that traded after the high, you can only expect MAYBE 19,627,979 shares to be sold by those that bought since this run began.
If you do factor in shares that had exchanged hands multiple times by traders flipping for profit, it is likely that there are FAR fewer shares left that could be likely to be sold by those that bought in the range of .007-.023(the current price). And we already know that there are still new investors here that bought above a penny that are holding millions for a far higher price. That is yet another thing you would have to factor in to the equation.
At the end of the day, considering that, as of yet, AT LEAST 93% have not taken any profits since the current run, it's safe to assume that it's actually FAR more than 2/3 of the float that is locked up tight.
Man... using simple math and simple logic can be quite fun.
Disclaimer: All information of volume traded was found via the below link and calculated by myself.
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/rdsh/interactive-chart
Still no answer.
Here's the links I've compiled so far showing the background some of our management here. It includes names like Raytheon, NASA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy, and Texas A&M University.
It also shows patents that our CEO has received.
Dr. Jon N. Leonard
A Mars Colonization Approach that was submitted to The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-6135
List of all Patents associated with Dr. Jon N. Leonard
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/jon-n-leonard
Raytheon Newsletter showing that Dr Leonard had received patent through Raytheyon:
http://www.raytheon.com/news/technology_today/archive/2010_2.pdf
(pg 55:
JON N. LEONARD
JAMES SMALL
4490433 Mass spectrometer for entrained particles, and method for measuring masses of the particles)
5th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2006)
http://ronaldazuma.com/papers/ISMAR06_final.pdf
Shows him as attendee at the 2011 systems engineering research center annual research review
http://www.sercuarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Attendee-List.pdf
Dr. Joel Sercel
NASA SBIR 2015 Proposal
Demonstration of "Optical Mining" For Excavation of Asteroids and Production of Mission Consumables
http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/15/sbir/phase1/SBIR-15-1-H1.01-9278.html
Seminar given by Dr. Sercel at University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy
https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/colloquia/abstracts15A/sercel.html
Links showing that Dr. Sercel's proposal was selected by NASA for study under the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a program that aims to turn science fiction into science fact through the development of pioneering technologies.
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/05/08/niac/
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/niac-2015-phase-i-and-phase-ii-selections
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/apis-asteroid-provided-in-situ-supplies-100mt-of-water-from-a-single-falcon-9
Seminar at Texas A&M University
https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/2154178/SERCEL-02122015-AESS-Announcement.pdf
Link showing Dr. Sercel quoted in article about NASA's Asteroid Initiative and talking about ICS Associates Honey Bee project
http://spacenews.com/37559commercial-firms-push-alternative-approaches-for-nasa-asteroid-initiative/
Article about his Asteroid Mining business model
http://www.space.com/30582-asteroid-mining-water-propulsion.html
Chart information prior to the tautachrome acquisition and new management is mostly irrelevant.
Considering it really is two different companies with two different management teams and a completely new business, it's like putting two different charts together.
How does trading evenly at around 1000% up from just a few months ago while waiting on news make it a pos?
I'd argue that a pos would have been brought down far below this by now.
I agree. Itll be hard for it to do a pull back in to the subpenny range.
Like I've been saying, this isn't acting like a 500 mil float stock.
The majority of it is locked up and has been locked up since April.
If you consider all those that had been flipping the stock for profit over the last 5-6 months, I would estimate that 100s of millions of shares have been locked and not sold since the acquisition.
With the recent run up, there's a lot of shares that were bought in the .01+ range and I doubt many people would dump for a loss to take it below when they thought highly enough of the stock to buy in at those prices.
All IMO, though.
Yes, 530 million shares are in the float. HOWEVER, since RDSH acquired Click Evidence (now tautachrome), less than 500 million total shares have traded hands. Yes, in OVER 6 MONTHS, not even shares equal to the float have traded hands!
The majority of the float has been and is locked tight.
People keep asking why the market cap is so high for a company with no revenue... Well, the answer is simple. New investors find out the business idea, take a look at the new management's verified resumes, then want to invest. Shares are locked up and nobody wants to get out, so people have to pay premium prices.
The simple, and most basic principle of economics: supply and demand.
There is NO reason to think that 500 million shares will get dumped.
I'll be honest, I have no clue...
To the great majority of shareholders, the day to day activity doesn't matter.
Going green or red on less than .2% of the float being traded isn't a huge deal.
Since the click evidence acquisition was announced, the float hasn't even traded hands... There are so many shares that are locked away by people not posting on ihub all the time that in the end the only ones being affected right now are those that are here or worried about day trading.
In 6 months, less than 480 million TOTAL volume with 530 million shares freely tradable. Even since it first started going up in mid September, only 40 million shares traded hands; less than 35 million since it first broke a penny. Considering that quite a few of those were flipped multiple times, let's even say only 20% of those had been bought and flipped and the rest just changed hands only once from being held (which is unlikely). That would leave only 6% sold for profit since this most recent run up started a month and a half ago.
This still tells me that a LOT of people believe this is going higher.
I posted my links/dd and other reasoning earlier. I think this has a lot of potential. A BIG reason that I didn't mention earlier us the fact that our ceo DOESN'T have experience being a publicly traded otc ceo. He's not worried about putting out crap/fluff PRs to inflate the share price.
The last time I saw a fake PR like that the stock crashed and is now stuck at 0001/0002 and almost no activity. Hope that doesn't happen to you guys here.
Has there been any more information about it or what happened?
Hope they catch whoevers doing it.
Always be wary of news that sounds too good to be true.
Very nice!
An established company with revenue looking to expand would be a bad thing causing people to want to sell?
What I posted is what I'd like to see more of.
To be perfectly honest, I'm getting sick of a lot of posts just saying that this will reach $$ or that it's going back sub penny.
We're not doing anything to attract any new investors that may stumble upon this board by not posting our reasons for being here.
Yes, people can go to http://www.klickzie.com or http://www.tautachrome.com and see what they say, but I want others to realize why I, and others like me, are actually here and want to stay invested.
No, there's no revenues and we have no clue when that could be. But I've spoken with the CEO and done my research into the management. I know their educational and employment backgrounds. I've seen their accomplishments. I know that they have been working the last few months to turn the company around.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/RDSH/filings
Form Type | Received | Period Ending
8-K Sept 28, 2015 Sept 28, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10927506
8-K Sept 21, 2015 Sept 17, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10919617
10-Q Sept 8, 2015 Jun 30, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10902616
8-K Sept 3, 2015 May 21, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10897881
10-Q Aug 25, 2015 Mar 31, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10881612
8-K Aug 24, 2015 Aug 24, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10879124
10-Q Aug 3, 2015 Sept 30, 2014
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10836709
10-Q Jul 28, 2015 Jun 30, 2014
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10825917
10-Q Jul 22, 2015 Mar 31, 2014
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10817039
10-K Jul 9, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10802189
SC 13D Jun 8, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10748440
Form 3 Jun 6, 2015 May 21, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10748315
3/A Jun 2, 2015 May 21, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10739213
SC 13D Jun 1, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10734853
8-K May 29, 2015 May 28, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10730583
Form 3 May 28, 2015 May 21, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10729088
8-K May 26, 2015 May 21, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10723127
8-K May 18, 2015 May 18, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10708352
8-K May 8, 2015 May 5, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10683550
8-K May 1, 2015 May 1, 2015
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10663452
Take a look at RDSH. NEW Management as of 5 months ago!
Links compiled so far proving, or at least providing some pretty good evidence of, the background of RDSH Management.
Dr. Jon N. Leonard
A Mars Colonization Approach that was submitted to The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-6135
List of all Patents associated with Dr. Jon N. Leonard
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/jon-n-leonard
Raytheon Newsletter showing that Dr Leonard had received patent through Raytheyon:
http://www.raytheon.com/news/technology_today/archive/2010_2.pdf
(pg 55:
JON N. LEONARD
JAMES SMALL
4490433 Mass spectrometer for entrained particles, and method for measuring masses of the particles)
5th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2006)
http://ronaldazuma.com/papers/ISMAR06_final.pdf
Shows him as attendee at the 2011 systems engineering research center annual research review
http://www.sercuarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Attendee-List.pdf
Dr. Joel Sercel
NASA SBIR 2015 Proposal
Demonstration of "Optical Mining" For Excavation of Asteroids and Production of Mission Consumables
http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/15/sbir/phase1/SBIR-15-1-H1.01-9278.html
Seminar given by Dr. Sercel at University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy
https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/colloquia/abstracts15A/sercel.html
Links showing that Dr. Sercel's proposal was selected by NASA for study under the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a program that aims to turn science fiction into science fact through the development of pioneering technologies.
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/05/08/niac/
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/niac-2015-phase-i-and-phase-ii-selections
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/apis-asteroid-provided-in-situ-supplies-100mt-of-water-from-a-single-falcon-9
Seminar at Texas A&M University
https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/2154178/SERCEL-02122015-AESS-Announcement.pdf
Link showing Dr. Sercel quoted in article about NASA's Asteroid Initiative and talking about ICS Associates Honey Bee project
http://spacenews.com/37559commercial-firms-push-alternative-approaches-for-nasa-asteroid-initiative/
Article about his Asteroid Mining business model
http://www.space.com/30582-asteroid-mining-water-propulsion.html
Here's the links I've compiled so far proving, or at least providing some pretty good evidence of, the background of our management here.
Dr. Jon N. Leonard
A Mars Colonization Approach that was submitted to The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-6135
List of all Patents associated with Dr. Jon N. Leonard
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/jon-n-leonard
Raytheon Newsletter showing that Dr Leonard had received patent through Raytheyon:
http://www.raytheon.com/news/technology_today/archive/2010_2.pdf
(pg 55:
JON N. LEONARD
JAMES SMALL
4490433 Mass spectrometer for entrained particles, and method for measuring masses of the particles)
5th International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2006)
http://ronaldazuma.com/papers/ISMAR06_final.pdf
Shows him as attendee at the 2011 systems engineering research center annual research review
http://www.sercuarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Attendee-List.pdf
Dr. Joel Sercel
NASA SBIR 2015 Proposal
Demonstration of "Optical Mining" For Excavation of Asteroids and Production of Mission Consumables
http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/15/sbir/phase1/SBIR-15-1-H1.01-9278.html
Seminar given by Dr. Sercel at University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy
https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/colloquia/abstracts15A/sercel.html
Links showing that Dr. Sercel's proposal was selected by NASA for study under the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC), a program that aims to turn science fiction into science fact through the development of pioneering technologies.
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/05/08/niac/
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/niac-2015-phase-i-and-phase-ii-selections
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/apis-asteroid-provided-in-situ-supplies-100mt-of-water-from-a-single-falcon-9
Seminar at Texas A&M University
https://engineering.tamu.edu/media/2154178/SERCEL-02122015-AESS-Announcement.pdf
Link showing Dr. Sercel quoted in article about NASA's Asteroid Initiative and talking about ICS Associates Honey Bee project
http://spacenews.com/37559commercial-firms-push-alternative-approaches-for-nasa-asteroid-initiative/
Article about his Asteroid Mining business model
http://www.space.com/30582-asteroid-mining-water-propulsion.html
When the top was called on the 14th and we were told to sell, the share price had a high of .018 and a low of .017
It continued up OVER 100% to .039.
Even after the pullback it is currently at 025 which is 39% higher than the high of day when the top was called.
If you take our low after the pullback, which was .02, that's still 10% higher than the high of day when the top was called.
It's possible, but really it'll come when they're ready and have good news to put out. It could be today, next week, a month from now or more. So far they've done well about not putting out fluff just to affect the share price.
Until then, I will continue to do my own due diligence and I will do better to post what I find.
In fact, I'm wanting to put together a nice post that contains all of the links we've found that shows and proves the background of the management here.
I'm sick of people coming here claiming that what the we and the co websites claim are false when a lot of us have already done our DD, but not all of its posted.
I want to compile a list of links like shylos about the relationship with NASA or the articles showing that Dr Leonard worked at Raytheon and did the things he said he did. I know they've been talked about and posted, but all info should be easily available to new readers of the board.
People should get able to come here and KNOW the whole story by looking at a sticky and the intro , not just bits and pieces.
Snapchat was valued at over 4 billion prior to having any revenue.
Even now with 2015 revenue of barely 50 million expected, it's value is around 16 billion. That's 320 times expected revenue. If you base it on revenue already received from 2014 of 3 million, then it would be 5,333 times revenue.
I tried telling you earlier that startup tech companies' valuation isn't based on already received revenue but you laughed. I can find dozens of startup tech companies that had similar instances as snapchat, such as pinterest, Amazon, Dropbox, Instagram, etc.
Some have valuations 10-100s of times current revenue. Some have only a few times current revenue. Some have zero revenue, but valued in hundreds of millions or billions.
No, I won't say this will be the next snapchat or Instagram because I don't know. I won't ever claim to know either. I only know what I can see and what I've researched on my own about the companies I invest in and those that others have invested in in the past.
Market cap is not as cut and dry as you want to make it out to be, especially not on an extremely low traded penny stock.
Like I've explained before... Supply and demand. The basics of economics... Enough people want shares here and think it'll be worth more, but not enough people are willing to sell at low enough prices for some, like yourself, to buy in. Others see future value higher than you do. Those people own LITERALLY hundreds of millions of shares and have not sold. That statement is based on the fact that not even volume equal to that of the float has traded hands since the new team took over. In the last 6 months, which goes back before click evidence was acquired, only 465 million shares have traded. And less than 180 million have traded since the acquisition. Factor in all of those that have jumped in and out, then, it's very easy to see that the float is held on to very tight.
The majority of shareholders, or at least the people that own the majority of the float, are not selling and have not sold. I don't know exactly their reasons, but obviously a lot of people believe these shares to be worth much more.
I took profits all the way up and am sitting on a couple million free shares.
Volume has never been enough for me to want to try flipping here. This one hasn't behaved the way anyone has said or thought it would yet, so I took enough to guarantee profits and will do what I think is right based on what I see happening.
People did sell then, that's how it went down.
I always love comments like that... lol.
For a tech company? It could be zero or millions depending on the idea, marketing, or who's wanting to buy it. Market cap for tech company startups are never based on revenues.
I don't think anyone would ever claim it'd go up that high on no revs with the current share structure.
At least i wouldn't...
Most, I hope, are talking about after a successful launch and proven revenue
I would argue the opposite. Based on the posts stated on here and the extremely low volume it took to move compared to the number of shares in the float, I'd say this run and sell off has been mostly just from ihubbers riding the waves.
I honestly think the vast majority of the float hasn't exchanged hands in quite some time.
If you add up all of the volume since click evidence was acquired, then factor in all of those that have flipped or jumped in and out a few times, it's pretty easy to see that there are a lot that are holding pretty tight.
The total volume since the end of may hasn't even been traded. That's EXTREMELY rare for an OTC stock that runs up way over 1000%.
So basically, what I'm getting at is that the VAST majority of the shares are owned and held VERY tight by non-ihubbers.
All my opinion, based on the stocks trading history since tautachrome took over.
Nevermind, misread your post.
Now you proved me wrong. That is the kind of posts I was talking about.
Sorry. Wasn't referring to you.
Posting facts about the stock and company is fine.