Always Digging
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm GAHC Long And Gamblers are found in ... Vegas. Not where my dot is and will be seen. GLTU
Can you pull up any Blockchain related news ? Or does Blockchain Tech Corp we have stake in have a asset that has Bitcoin related revenue and would be devastating for argument .. Hmm
I do agree that the price of Coin will have little to do with revenue here but it keeps constant reminder that the underlying technology and its value rise as well .. So how much does that stake or investment back then worth now do you figure ? with the obvious mass global acceptance happening.
Wrong , I am here BC of combination of voting tech and Blockchain technology and a much greater long game , the stake we have in a Block/Bit company already has what assets under it if you do not mind sharing ?
Being able to finally have the resource/tech to hammer manipulation in all its forms presents the SEC with a unique opportunity to go after the Gold mine of fines/govt revenue down here. Just imagine...not to mention the past digital footprints that come with.
OTC company whose operations were cleared to conduct Teamsters Union elections which before only the DoJ was controlling and being paid to do. Pretty scummy says you?
"Do I feel" - Barley
"Blatant manipulation" - assumed?
"Blind eye" - nope , look at what they did to the others , protecting the public from possible future fraud due to lack of available public information and to verify the claimed assets, that isn't understandable? or being blind eye to you ? Hmm
"Free Open Market" - your in it, and have your choice of companies but it's on you , solely you to connect the dots and see if what you see really has the power under the hood , else go up a few tiers.
"Lying scummy OTC" - sounds like a series of bad choices Imo
The SEC covers a heck of a lot of ground with not enough resource , with what they are taking on now (crypto) hopefully with the tech trends going on currently they will be able to utilize exactly what's needed to be more proficient in the role, no ?
Whenever someone starts out with "trust me" My eye brow raises ever so slightly. Lol
I love how you avoid my questions ?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=134316544
Or best not to engage a knowledgeable Long?
Scrooge "sec is a scam" - all I need to know about that opinion.
Wait until SEC starts doing what IRS is doing right JBo ? They will , and harden up with modern tech , block, bigdata analysis, the usual.
Sweeping public forums , duplicating the I/O of online sites and putting Ip's on ghosts , manipulators do not stand a chance soon and years of data like this platform will be prime hunting grounds. Minimal manpower backed by modern technology, so what you see where the little red ip, dots show up on map /address or if they stack up .. oh ?
Be afraid. Wait until they start recruiting looking for attributes not unlike my own.
SEC has their weapon of choice and manipulators will not even know until too late.
Replying to what you said then , I see your tagging this to Coin ... Heavily , and see the main theme in last sentence. Volatile , it's what all traders want isn't it. First entry should be green ..Or now is time to load after sell perhaps.
To each to their own Leroy.
GAHC Long
Then they shouldn't be looking at the Blockchain solution , no?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133418558
Read last paragraph in latest PR.
"Company is developing multiple election platforms including Internet voting and voting solutions using the Blockchain."
Multiple election platforms ...meaning 3 silos ?
Internet voting & voting solutions using the Blockchain ... integrated with Block, contracted I believe.
"I don't care what the future hold for this company" say no more .. Dreams or DD again ?
Back to the other meaning of "internet voting" , my apologies that the draw took as long as it did but could not be helped, tied into to many things at once when updating and even had to restructure my own understanding of the dynamic. Everyone falling apart today, comical. Glad I paid no mind to the action.
Pulling base reference from previous blocks.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131994674
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131994690
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131995141
mentioned in Dec as well.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=127061376
Public Democracy Structure under Public Group
http://publicgroup.com.au/public-group-lproducts-and-services/public-group-business-model-and-overview/the-public-group-company-status-structure
Make landfall Nov 9/10th 2015
-http://va.registryabstracts.com/public-democracy-america-inc
-https://www.flcompanygo.com/Public-Democracy-America-Inc-P15000092094/
But that is when they had Public Democracy America acquire Eleison LLC as well.
http://publicgroup.com.au/public-group-lproducts-and-services/public-group-licensing-database-marketing/the-database
"The original database developers had a specific focus on America's rich and complex faith influenced political landscape and have build strong relationships with such values-driven communities from across the ideological spectrum on the local and national level in the US."
http://publicgroup.com.au/public-group-background-information/16-the-public-group-acquires-a-major-big-data-asset
"The Data.
The extensive nature of the attitudinal, behavioural and values-based information, with an over 10 year history, covering 114 million US citizens, provides an invaluable and highly accurate platform to gauge future attitudes, behaviour and consumer patterns. Political organisations and campaigns (such as the US Presidential and Mid Term elections) have been using the database to gauge voter attitudes to proposed policies and to set effective campaign strategies."
Immeasurable value to political demographics no?
http://publicgroup.com.au/index.php/component/content/article?id=4:the-difference-in-the-public-democracy-platform
Signed agreements with US based listed company to 'license' the use of the PDA platform for commercial purposes in three 'silos'.
So after coming to America and arming themselves per se ,,,time to find the vehicle and market ?
http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/global-enters-loi-with-maker-of-popular-voting-app-otc-pink-gahc-2138176.htm
...PD has a vast database they must keep up and accurately updating to retain its value and app internet based Voting/opinion polling platform , John & GAHC/GES have the connections and market/vehicle, BTC/Nick has the patents and Tech to enable both to not only survive but thrive in this new age.
They all require each other. I understand. Hence three way symbiosis statement earlier. Now plugging that into the recent--
Mr.Spanos says "Contracted to work on a token" that's why the question surfaced before. Whose token I ask again ? BTC has the Tech to upgrade PD platform to validate the accuracy of their data as well as their offering to clients. "internet voting platform" will be a "Blockchain voting platform" part of the offering from PD to GES and but also return benefits updating the Eleison database. Win-win-win
Looks full circle to me now. Glad to see Mr.Spanos gearing and busy. "Contracted"
We get him the contracts he completes old deal ... Random tangent, pay no mind.
As intelligent as management(all companies) was to position themselves strategically to dominate their relative sectors I can take a guess they assumed that there may be a few shareholders that could be able to see it as well , but usually only longs put that type of energy to understand such things. And the financier was a genius btw , my Hat is off with that one.
Any thoughts ?
GAHC Long
What's your avg ? If you do not mind me asking.
Busy all day compiling, still the story starts in 2015 , what a great year.
Good to see you back, so ... it's a three-way symbiosis.
"Contracted to work on a token" , yes , I asked that question that surfaced while data mining, the post before talking about older associations , posted to gather feedback if anyone has already looked into , was at that moment surprised to find out about a Bigdata acquisition that had taken place, the database was rather extensive so instead of pause I posted and continued. Still gearing.
"I remember all the negative posts then too" -- there were many I agree.
What token are they working on is a good question now.
So the LOI didn't Happen until after Eleison was acquired.
From a previous post "internet voting" is two fold, Smartmatic & Australian Voting App.
Our history with Smartmatic starts around here most likely when they had used Blockchain Voting for a Utah GOP online caucus.
https://www.wired.com/2016/03/security-experts-arent-going-like-utahs-online-primary/amp
Since that point
http://www.smartmatic.com/news/article/ges-and-smartmatic-complete-successful-organized-labor-election-in-hawaii/
"elections including blockchain technology, licenses and patents supporting election services"
http://www.smartmatic.com/news/article/ges-and-smartmatic-further-relationship-with-second-election/
http://www.smartmatic.com/news/article/ges-continues-to-further-relationship-with-smartmatic/
Then nothing since..
We have them talking Blockchain Voting a lot though.
This is a neat read of Mungica with a kiosk producer.
http://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/what-election-technology-actions-are-needed-now.html?AMP
Here is most recent -- Aug 27 2017
Noticed he went after Ballots....
"hackers did not have the opportunity to compare the vulnerabilities of a box full of marked paper ballots (considered the alternative to technology) Sounds like a idiot now Imo .. Paper ballots are the Standard and the physical, Blockchain is ancillary. Hackers did not have chance to break into a physical box of marked paper ballots... he is joking right ? Way to drive a stake threw himself while attempting to take full vantage of Defcon event.
Hackers broke into every single electronic platform there, his company direction looks to not be with paper ballots since he is pulling that to lick the wounds. Can not compare and telling to his intent now .
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/outdated-technology-is-a-greater-threat-than-hackers-to-us-elections/article/2632532
Related events , might be a good choice anyway from the read below to not be what "internet voting" was referring, Although some countries are not so comfortable with future with them it appears.
http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2017/08/30/1734035/smartmatic-again-election-2019
Never the less get in line for a License come time no?
On to the next meaning
And in real news I have been mining "internet voting" more since mentioned alongside Blockchain Voting Platform/Apparatus (whatever name right) , just keep eyes if elected officials start looking at it right?
I will pull the links and all I find but having a lesser knowledge on that direction We must remedy, agreed?
Found more mentions , Nice they have included recent news update as well.
http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/Cryptocurrencies-Gain-Popularity-1002291574
Good reads for elections industry
"Security experts and voting-machine vendors are already exploring what’s needed to make the next generation of machines more secure. Among the wide variety of solutions being explored or proposed are use of encryption, blockchain, and open source software.
While each of these technologies can offer a path to more secure voting, the most important technology for enhancing security has been around for millennia: paper. Specifically, every new voting machine in the United States should have a paper record that the voter reviews, and that can be used later to check the electronic totals that are reported.
This could be a paper ballot the voter fills out before it is scanned by a machine, or a record created by the machine on which the voter makes her selections—so long as she can review that record and make changes before casting her vote."
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/524820/
"Coercion is a threat for any voting system that offers remote participation (e.g. postal votes). For both BEV and paper elections, the use of private polling booths is the only guarantee against fraud" so why not both together ? Good science. Thank you EU.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2016/581918/EPRS_ATA%282016%29581918_EN.pdf
How did you draw that ? Just wandering...because with the regulatory environment currently I doubt he would want to draw unnecessary attention/investment to a traded company without everything ironed out and the association to a traded company,also since he is speaking ICO, gets regulatory approval/oversite, even filing it says proposed merger with BTCorp and tell me that went well for another traded company that didn't go threw the correct channels before drawing investment and eyes or with Bitcoin running north and knowing these tickers get jumped up on industry momo ,taking precautions since he kept mentioning us in tag is thought to be safe as well.
It sounds safe given the environment, no?
I thought you gave a very well done DD package on the recent update I am linking back to in reply and thought you would be patient to see how the last paragraph in the update which IS tied to Blockchain and Core business to generate revenue....turns out. But to each their own and I would like to compliment your data draw on background work, with not mine but I remembered it from then and pulled since it is rather well done.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121753226
Is GES still moving ? Sure.
https://teamsters710.com/2017/08/24/notice-of-nomination-and-election-for-officers-of-local-710-ibt/amp/
One can pick up the trail following the Union news feeds.
Using GAHC tag to draw shareholder eyes,, current and perspective...no?
"ICO hashtag" Data fact is that he didn't start doing that(including in lower tags) until after SEC had issued notice , but first mention was 07/14 as a reply to a question. A stray lower back in June but no pattern surrounding.
Here is a second point for reference. If helps .
http://executives.findthecompany.com/l/324287/Mr-Nick-Spanos
https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=302814479&privcapId=302898426&previousCapId=302898426&previousTitle=Blockchain%20Apparatus,%20Ltd.
Under his Profile for Apparatus Subsidiary.
There is a mention ?
Not concreting anything but Scott did ask where the data feed went and that was first thing that came to mind that's all.
Hammering a website ? Here is previous posts regarding.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132644388
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132646194
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132644740
Even I laid down reason no?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132644979
Since then BTCorp put up the new site...
I have been gearing the different scenarios involving a ICO from Nick , GAHC and shareholders are in no danger from my view, taking the safest route so far Imo if BTCorp does plan to.. GAHC has not drawn attention here by any measure beyond what's already known for the Blockchain voting product. But still ...I can't not help feeling otherwise regarding a ICO at all with a few things out of place, least to me. I will be patient for the answers but we are in a good place atm.
GAHC Long
Depends right ?
"when the SEC declared that because certain species of ICO tokens were marketed with the promise of profits, they were behaving like securities. And so, the regulator said, they should be subject — depending “on the facts and circumstances” — to the rules that govern all securities."
Saying before there are variables mentioned here.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=134169067
Always welcome, much still to discuss with as many variables in play.
That is Digital Asset Vending Enterprises (D.A.V.E) a subsidiary of BTCorp. Yes, they expanded heavily per website. Found some detailed literature on product here I believe for setup ?
http://www.bitcoin.bg/doc/Cash2BTCsetup.pdf
And main site info-
http://blockchaintechcorp.com/btc-innovation-lab/
Again 10% stake currently that we know, tenable 30% ..with the right to acquire 20% more from a debt holder, have not heard of yet.
The goal in the original proposed design would be for a merger but.. we will see. Again the possible ICO dynamic.
It certainly does in my book as a Long, What will some go after next ? "Look at revenue dropping off"?
Yes, why wouldn't it ? We had a primary election cycle since middle of last year and a slow down was expected.
Currently our source of revenue is subsidiary Global Election Services(GES), a reputable election services provider having a strong middle market with over 100 organized Labor unions they service. Will revenue turn back up not unlike first 2 Q's of '16 and keep growing again now? After all Global had just acquired GES and the first stake in BTC the same year('15) with a strategic agenda to roll out BTCorp's Blockchain voting solution. The mentioned "internet voting" and "blockchain" voting platform recent update gives GAHC a new range of larger markets/opportunities , even mainstream. Having the 20yr Blockchain voting patent does leverage crypto technology a bit none could argue, I keep watch for movement, but with AIA - YES, it can't be helped to think Granted case is Likely even more so with Slidechain Block patent already receiving grant and both published on the same date. What of our stake in BTC to remain the same or more? That is the question now isn't it, certainly mine , and overlaps with the possible ICO dynamic that Mr.Spanos seeks.
What about the company now may you be referring ? The board deserves detail and solid foundation for such strong suggestion. "Everyone expects" - what exactly ? If you do not mind.