Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ya know ... I've heard that and heard that and heard that again from folks that come cruising through here and, thus far anyway, it's never significant of anything. Does not appear to be any reason to believe it is or will be different in this case.
Good choice.
Funny guy and nice effort to distract from the very valid point that the SEC does actively delist companies that are delinquent in their filings and that SWET, which last reported for Q3 2015, could be delisted. But you just continue with your fantasy that SWET's going to pull a rabbit out of the hat and come up with PPAs and financing for this obvious boondoggle.
Because nothing says happy holidays like shares of a POS stock stuffed into the old stocking.
Yeah, but there's nothing financially or fundamentally strong about SWET. It's insolvent and its done no real world testing whatsoever to prove its hypothesis. So, it's both financially and fundamentally bankrupt -- and I use that word figuratively.
Those acquisitions before the election were all via convertible debentures.
As usual, you did not show me where I erred, so I'll continue with the working throry that you're full of @&>/.
That's not what he said and you know it. Here's the actual statement:
More than a bit like waiting for Gadot at this point, no?
Here, I fixed it for you.
Do what exactly ... push a scam stock?
Any day now right? Buy low, sell high. Past performance is not an indicator of future results. Something must be happening, right! The SWET train is rolling now! Yeah, right to a delisting. You all should take your BS and peddle it somewhere else. SWET was never a real company (which I think you acknowledge) and, as a stock selling scam, its best days are long behind it.
Isn't that sweet, your friend came back to play with you.
Hope springs eternal, right. Even in the face of all evidence to the contrary.
You just feel it, right? Your friends all seem to have gotten the message that this POS is not going anywhere except down the drain.
You can continue to push this POS based on the BS "insider trading" but it appears that your friends have abandoned you.
And they are laughing all the way to the bank at the suckers who are falling for it. By all means, go ahead and buy and hold.
How is a non-existent tower of power going to generate profits?
I don't care what the Form 4 says, I don't believe for a minute that Ron dropped $125K into SWET stock.
You catch on fast my young padawan learner. Everything about SWET is designed to benefit the insiders.
Insiders "loading up" or trading among themselves? I'm going with the latter.
Turds don't take craps. It's a share selling machine.
They most definitely were not open market. He allegedly purchased them on the 26th and filed the 4 on the 27th. Look at the volume. It does not support the assertion that they were acquired on the open market.
At last, a flyby poster who recognizes that it's all BS.
You need to get out of 2014 and move into the present day. National Standard financing this thing was always a work of fiction. There was never any commitment on its part to provide financing. All that ever existed between SWET and National Standard was a non-binding letter of intent.
No, there has been no ground breaking. SWET doesn't have enough $ to buy a shovel much less break ground on this farce.
In the Form 4, Ron checked off that he's a 10% shareholder. Whether it's true or not is another matter, but he did check the box.
No way that was an open market trade. Just read the former. Date of the earliest trade was 10/26 and the form was filed on the 27th. The volume simply does not support the assertion. Furthermore, having gotten virtually all of his shares for free, there is simply no way that Ron dropped $125k on this POS.
LTN* -- No K for 2015, no Qs for 2016 and it filed a Form 15 earlier this summer. So yeah, now that I've looked at it, I do see the comparison. It may have run when the CEO "bought" shares but it was all hocus pocus (pardon the Halloween pun) and, much like there was apparently no substance behind that move, there is no substance behind this move by Pickett. And given that SWET's just bouncing between .0001 and .0003, I think it's pretty well "run" as far as it's going to. For anyone tempted, get in and get out quick lest you be the one holding the bag.
It's there some point to your question?
Here, I fixed it for you too:
This POS ran a bit when SWET announced the possibility of an R/S and ran a bit right around the turn of the year, each was inexplicable and each time there was no news and it settled right back into .0001. Be surprised if any news comes out as these flyby posters are predicting or if it does anything but settle back into .0001. SWET's been on a two plus year slide for a reason. There is no magic bullet.
Here, I fixed it for you:
Be careful with your Google searches. As I said in an earlier post, I think it's likely it was extended, but only because (a) it didn't cost SWET anything and (b) because the sellers can terminate at any time. It is interesting though that, given SWET's history of PRing just about anything, that SWET has not issued any PRs to announce the extensions -- at least something to keep hope alive -- likely because it can't afford to do even that and none of Pickett, Sadle or Crabb are going to reach into their pockets to perpetuate the myth of SWET. After all, the key to any good share selling scam is to only use other people's money.
Doesn't change that I share your view that this is a zombie ticker.
So, you're going to look at everything but the company fundamentals, whether its actually accomplished any of the things it announced it was working on, and the soundness of its alleged technology. Good luck with that! Do be careful with those blinders though.
Unlike some folks around here, Nomad plainly articulates the basis for his vision. I'm with him; the outcome's already been determined.
Nice catch!
That's a pretty big "if". The prospect of an update, to the extent there is one, is fueled by some rather inexplicable trading/bid activity such that "something's gotta be happening, right?!" Not necessarily, particularly when you factor in everything we know about this ticker.
There's a fair number of people around here who think Pickett should be behind bars.
That statement's been up since just about day one I believe.