Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOLzzzzzzz. Lies from the CLOWN indeed. Question is, who is this clown you are referring to?
Please identify these rulings. I would love to review these cases.
Wrong again.
We are using Giact's service for additional fraud protection and I believe MYEC is going to incorporate Sionic's loyalty program into their app. I believe he also said that MYEC might use Cuallix(sp?) app for international payments, and all of these companies process their payments through MYEC.
I think people are confused about what Ed said. When he mentioned "value-added" he was talking about partnerships not clients. Partnerships where we use something of theirs in exchange for them using our product. (i.e., Giact, Sionic, etc.) Dad's coffee, Filter of the Month, and so forth are just straight clients. I'm not sure why so many are confused by the distinction (not you specifically but I've seen this mentioned numerous times regarding the "value-added" comment by Ed.)
Also goes along with the MYEC sales team currently acting more as "order takers" rather than actual salesmen due to the demand for the MYEC service from merchants.
I suspect you're half right. They will drop both claims once Zipmark signs a new licensing agreement. MARK IT!
Edit: By drop I mean that they will settle on the breach of contract thus dismissing that claim, and when Zipmark signs a new contract the patent infringement claim will become moot and thereby dismissed as well.
Indeed, and to think otherwise seems illogical to me. Given the vastly changing landscape of the payments industry, protection of MYEC's intellectual property is paramount.
I suspect that the ripple effect will be something to behold after we force Zipmark to capitulate.
Wait and see indeed, and if they have to change the name who cares. Call it FastPay...QuickPay.....Check21Pay....ACH SucksPay....it doesn't matter to me.
Woah....not so fast. Who said they have to change the name? Trademark infringement is based on a balancing test with consumer confusion being the ultimate issue. So lets apply facts and common sense here. MYEC's product is an actual app with the target end user being individual consumers. This other company's product is not an application but a system that payment application providers can use within their existing app or legacy system and as this company puts it:
"Let us be the engine inside your commerce ecosystem. FreedomPay remains invisible to your customers; your own brand imagery, colors and logos take the stage, and your brand gets all the credit for a great purchase experience."
You think that John Doe is going to confuse MYEC's payment application with an invisible engine running inside of another system or application? I doubt it, and the fact that not a single poster here had heard of this company prior to MYEC FreedomPay only furthers the obvious that consumer confusion would not exist.
Just so happens to be on the PayPal campus. Time to start landing some big fish!!!
Oh I'm coded for penny stocks and I have Fidelity's Active Trader Pro (again level 2 for pennies is non existent only as you get real time buys and sells but no Bid/Ask MM information) but I still pay 7.95. Maybe I should call to see if they'll lower my rate.
How do you pay 7.00 a trade with Fidelity? I pay 7.95 per trade which is still better than Etrade. I might switch to Etrade simply for their level II quotes. Fidelity's level II only works for big board stocks or when ARCA randomly shows up in the OTC.
May not be as costly as one might think. If Zipmark willfully and blatantly infringed on MYEC's patent then MYEC may be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees if they prevail. As a matter of fact the USSC rendered decisions this year that may make it more likely that district court judges will grant attorney's fees since the level of scrutiny their decisions receive has been diminished.
IMO there's no way Zipmark lets this go to trial. First, they might have their operations completely shut down at the outset if a temporary injunction is granted, and secondly the potential costs (legal and damages) would cripple them. Most likely they are going to fall into line and sign a new licensing agreement.
NEWS!!!!
This "GARBAGE" UP over 1000% in 12 MONTHS. LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
I'm glad you come to that realization.
WOAH!!! Who do you think you are applying facts to an argument? One thing I know is that I will be voting. LMFAO....LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
MYEC$$$$$$$$.....about to make a lot of shareholders extremely wealthy! Some calling for an SEC Halt is pure comedy gold!!! LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Good luck with that. Lolzzzzzzzzz
Incorrect. The Form 10 was present for added veracity. LMAO....LOLzzzzzzzz.....
He has zero to do with MYEC. The argument that he does is fallacious.
I hope that if they do spin off Green Pay that it is not a 1-for-1 share issuance. I would much rather receive 1 share of Green Pay for every 10 shares of MYEC. Keeping that company with a relatively low float (400MM) would be nice considering the growth potential in that sector.
THAT IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT MYEC PAID FOR OR HAD ANY INVOLVEMENT WITH ANY OF THE PROMOTIONS!!! THAT DOESN'T EVEN COUNT AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE....LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
166 PAID PROMOS
And yes there is ZERO evidence MYEC paid for any of these
LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
WARNING: 4.9 BILLION SHARES A/S, TA NOT GAGGED, and O/S UNCHANGED IN OVER 8 MONTHS.
LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
NO SNAKE OIL HERE!!!. Just "THE" Check 21 patent that has already been cited by the likes of Google. Lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This GARBAGE UP 1000% in 12 MONTHS. I HOPE THIS GARBAGE PERFORMS THIS "BAD" OVER THE NEXT 12 MONTHS. LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
I shook it and looked. Wow the OS hasn't changed in over 8 months. Doesn't looks dilution to me. LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
I bought boat load of 9's today with the understanding that the OS can be maxed out at 1B. That's not outrageous for an OTC particularly one earning profits and in the process of making moves to keep increasing profits. Oh yeah and they are a fully reporting company to boot. $$$$$
NO CURRENT ACTIVE LAWSUITS
REVS UP 182,000+ from LAST YEAR'S Q
LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
TOTAL SCAM
Solid Company Always Manipulated
For once we agree. LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Placed an order at the ask price 5 minutes ago and my order has yet to fill. Hmmmm.....
Can one truly have common sense without actually being able to spell common sense? lmao.......IMHO!
Audits complete, MYEC branded apps delayed, new licensee announced yesterday has a managing partner who was/is a shareholder. Bid support pretty strong.
There you go I fixed if for you.
BOOM!!!! Someone just caught a fish for dinner!
How do you know if they are active in DE? Did you pay the 10 dollar fee to obtain the status of the company as required here?
[url][/url][tag]http://corp.delaware.gov/onlinestatus.shtml[/tag]
SMH....LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
REVS UP 182k+ from LAST YEAR'S Q
and over 1,000,000 PROFIT from operations through first 2 Q's this year!! LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz