Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Have to agree we do not know about revs on transactions for the 3 yrs, we can assume that but... it only stated they will license it, which of course does bring in revenue from the licensing.
I am right here with you Uubar. Been in here a long time and have sold and bought in when the time seemed right. LONG term this is going to be great just my opinion as always.
To much pump to hang on. Shame I got in late only 75%. Thanks. Will keep watching though.
It does make a difference when the business calendar year starts and ends for that particular company. Most use the Jan thru Dec but some are different.
Year and 1/2 old. Yet keeping it real.
They would need to be hitting on all 8 cylinders in volume and a few big signups of service or the walmart group to incorporate it into their new app.
Without looking back at the news are there still shares that they may recover and cancel?
The revenues would need to increase significantly. In time it is possible.
Oh I agree Africa will be huge but depends on the acceptance rate. If the bank really pushes it, which could be since it was stated their banking software is based on the MyEcheck software, that is could move quickly.
I do have to agree that a RS may be needed to move anywhere higher in the otc and certainly any higher trading market. It will take to long for revs to cover the current share structure. Unless something majorly crazy happens.
If you look thru any company's filings, especially nasdaq listed companys, show me one that does not have correspondence from sec to clarify a filing. I just looked thru apple and there are numerous questions posed by sec to thier filing.How many more would there be by a company that was not current and is trying to become fully reporting.
How else would they qualify to be listed OTCQB if they did not meet the quafications.
Isn'the that the point of becoming current. True transparency. There was a lot that happened since they went cold in filings. Shows the dd by the sec in making a fully reporting company uphold transparency to the shareholder. Keeping current now is what's important to the sharehold er stand now and future shareholders.
Would Tesla, Einstein, Henry Ford or any other visionary work instead.
Lunatic or driven to perfection. Depends on which side of the fence.
I cannot comment on his work habits since I am not there. Anything about the lawsuit is speculative. Would you expect anything else from a disgruntled EX employee but to have language like that. Good work from the lawyer.
See I like the part where it states due to the LARGE amount of checks he has brought in due to his work.
How do you not know what or if I correspond with MyECheck. Is it because you do not see it on facebook, to which I have posted and gotten responses? Because I do not post responses on here? Or is it because I have corresponded and then am able to question your postings/motives. What a tangled web we weave.
Do you consider that a fact of the issue that names are changing as to who originally posted a message and then names have since changed. Now that is weird.
How would we possible know where(dilutive) and of what kind(shorted) the shares they have that are being sold. It is all speculation. Please.
Isn't it weird that the first message with a link was from whitefish to plutus and then it became linked to party to plutus with then a response from whitefish. Now that's weird.
Have you looked thru the amendments. Really look hard.
The thing about testing software is that you do this in a test system before being added to a live system. Some settings may not be the same in the test environment which may change how the software reacts in the live system. I have seen that many times during software implementation.
From Sept really. Good dd fish.
But don'the worry I will not get in any debate with you because your analogies bore me.
In cliff notes.Is it the tick test or the requirement of mm to be able to borrow shares you do not und er stand.
You seem well versed. What would you not know.
54% short volume. Enough said.
54% short volume. Enough said.
As long as they stay current will not fall back to pink. They have the test of .01 on bid already.
How many are needed to make a very nice on RTI. That is debatable because everyone has a different perspective on what is a good return.
I have to admit I also bought some in the .04 range thinking it was just a fib pull back. But what I made on the .08 run up more than made up for the loss on those. I am not saying it was a good thing but it was pinky land after all.
Because you failed to realize .08 could not hold before and you made a bad investment decision. Are you trying to inform new investors that you may make bad investment decisions from time to time. Welcome to the club.
Just a wild guess but it will be delayed right up until it goes live. But that's just a assumption.
a five digit trade for that amount really.
in the otc pink 650 shares is small potatoes. Granted it is a large number but small potaotes in pinks.
Looks like a mm had some 00 shares to sell to let someone cover.
Now you know in reality and technical terms that to be incorrect Fish.
Original Issue Date: July 15, 2015
$50,000
10% CONVERTIBLE NOTE
DUE JULY 15, 2016
THIS 10% CONVERTIBLE NOTE is one of a series of duly authorized and validly issued 10% Convertible Notes of MyECheck, Inc. (the “Company”), having its principal place of business at 2600 E. Bidwell Street #190, Folsom, CA 95630, designated as its 10% Convertible Notes due July 15, 2016 (this Note, the “Note” and, collectively with the other Notes of such series, the “Notes”).
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Company promises to pay to Redwood Management, LLC or its registered assigns (the “Holder”), or shall have paid pursuant to the terms hereunder, the principal sum of $50,000 on July 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”) or such earlier date as this Note is required or permitted to be repaid as provided hereunder, and to pay interest to the Holder on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of this Note in accordance with the provisions hereof. This Note is subject to the following additional provisions:
Section 1. Definitions. For the purposes hereof, in addition to the terms defined elsewhere in this Note, (a) capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Exchange Agreement and (b) the following terms shall have the following meanings:
I see someone changed their socks so their opinion changed. Now that's funny.