Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Alky - You are exactly right!
I've worked many years for a Fortune 100 company negotiating multi-million dollar contracts like this one. Without exception, the top salesperson has worked out ALL of the high-level details sufficiently for the financial analysts to do an ROI analysis on both sides. Once the bean-counters confirm the salesperson's assumptions and put forth a proposed statement of work, the legal teams review. This all could take from 3 to 6 months depending on the complexity.
This AOT deal with TC is relatively complex, as you astutely alluded. Bigger et al would be foolish not to have anticipated the complexity of the possible final contract back in March of this year. They've had almost 6 months hence to figure out the details.
IMHO, as I write this, the TC deal is already written up in a statement of work (contract) and is in FINAL REVIEW by both organization's financial and legal beagles to give their final stamps of approval.
Bottom line: We will soon know HOW MUCH this contract is worth to both TC and STWA.
No need to worry about the stock price fluctuations unless you are flush enough to average down, which you'd be foolish not to do while you've got this great opportunity to do so.
ZERO LONG & STRONG
Cheers!
So TRUE, Whacky! Those guys only know how to bring down a viable investment. Consequently, we should put them all on ignore. What's the point in listening to those who fail to make cogent arguments backed up with FACTS?
ZERO-philes, stand up and applaud yourselves for your due diligence, stick-to-it-ness, and good cheer in the face of long-term adversity.
Sounds like a bunch of Navy Seals to me.
Chompie - The market ticked up for ZERO in the last several minutes of trading. That tells you that investors should be piling in tomorrow. Once this news gets out, we're going for a an upward ride. YIPPPEEEE!!!
STWA, GLTA!
WOWWWW!!!
"Quasar's CEO, Donnell J. Vigil is still in Colorado and will be returning to Florida to finalize the selection of an auditor to proceed with uplisting. Our counsel is prepared to file a Form 10, once the audit it completed."
Just hit a pps low of $0.64. When is STWA management going to react?
JT - No regrets. You were just trying to help investors. We thank you for that consideration. Cheers!
Great buy strategy, Money! Thanks for sharing. Cheers!
GREAT FIND, JT! I'm in it with you all the way to the SKY IS THE LIMIT.
TRULY! What difference does it make? NADA,ZIP,ZERO!
This stock is going to the MOON in the near future. AISI and his cohorts will never change that fact. Let's all play in this sandbox together and JOYfully look forward to soon realizing our our extraordinary winnings that we've patiently awaited for some time now.
This is typical Leftist MUCKRAKING...
of Conservative politicians. Read the article, and you'll see that Zinke parted ways with this PAC well before announcing (with the advice of legal counsel) in order to keep everything above board during his campaign.
Let's keep the leftist Democrat politics OFF this board. We don't need it.
Cheers!
This is exactly Gardner's / Olie's stated game plan of achieving asset growth through planned acquisitions. Trading should resume soon, and a new market assessment of the pps value of the newly formed entity (with MVP assets included) will begin in earnest.
Investopedia: "Forward" Acquisitions
As you can see, an acquisition may be only slightly different from a merger. In fact, it may be different in name only. Like mergers, acquisitions are actions through which companies seek economies of scale, efficiencies and enhanced market visibility. Unlike all mergers, all acquisitions involve one firm purchasing another - there is no exchange of stock or consolidation as a new company. Acquisitions are often congenial, and all parties feel satisfied with the deal. Other times, acquisitions are more hostile.
In an acquisition, as in some of the merger deals we discuss above, a company can buy another company with cash, stock or a combination of the two. Another possibility, which is common in smaller deals, is for one company to acquire all the assets of another company. Company X buys all of Company Y's assets for cash, which means that Company Y will have only cash (and debt, if they had debt before). Of course, Company Y becomes merely a shell and will eventually liquidate or enter another area of business.
Regardless of their category or structure, all mergers and acquisitions have one common goal: they are all meant to create synergy that makes the value of the combined companies greater than the sum of the two parts. The success of a merger or acquisition depends on whether this synergy is achieved.
CEO Paul Tidwell Interview = Instant Credibility!
JT - Thanks for sharing this link to the Paul Tidwell interview. Simply FASCINATING!
smallcapvoice.com/blog/12-2-13-smallcapvoice-interview-with-innocap-inc-inno/
For those fascinated by the sunken treasure salvage industry, as I am, you'll find no better company CEO than Paul Tidwell of INNO. In this brief 15 minute interview, Tidwell explains the HOW TOs of MAKING PROFITS in this arcane industry. Specifically, Tidwell lays out his success formula: Research, Discovery, Negotiation, Technology R&D, Salvage, Digital Documentation, Auction/Sales Chain Development, and Monetization (selling artifacts with provenance, Discovery Channel documentaries, movies, consulting). This guy is a PRO who'll no doubt SUCCEED in time. When? That's the only question that remains to be answered.
Soxfor@$%&:
Your picking & choosing to fit an agenda. STWA announced last year in a letter to shareholders EXACTLY what's necessary, and how far away we were back then. READ THE FILINGS!!!
In addition, last year at the SH meeting, it was explained we were around $400K short in SH equity & lacking (1)outside director. We've since raised SH equity almost $1M and added (2) directors.
Just say "NO" to OBFUSCATION!
Cheers,
Shrimclim
So RIGHT AGAIN, JT! Take responsibility for YOUR investment choices, people. It's called living in the real world. If you can't deal with losses as well as wins, you shouldn't be in this business of pennyland investing.
You win some, and you lose some here. BTW, this ROHIQ game isn't over yet. Let's wait for the fat lady to sing before we start thinking about crying in our beer.
GLTA!!!
Mr. Sano, You just got OLD-SCHOOLED by Skavenger!
Bravo, Zizek! I say "To Each His Own" JOY!!!
If you love responding to the naysayers, I say go for it! Refuting their twisted logic is a talent that I lack. Hence, I respect that talent in you. You are absolutely correct in saying that there are many lurkers who never post here, but who are constantly monitoring these boards for DD they lack. Everyone wants to be assured they've made the right investment and, after doing so, assured their risk continues to be worthwhile.
So, Zizek and all those like you who have the knowledge and talent to bring forward the TRUTH, please proceed with the blessing of most longterm ZERO investors.
Cheers,
Phaedrus
JT and Zizek are ON THE MONEY!
I completely agree with these two investors. SOMETHING BIG is in the OFFING. Hang on to your hats, ZEROphiles! Our Good Ship Lollipop is approaching the harbor. Let strong hands prevail.
GO ZERO!!!
Shrimclim
Fyi, IHUB is striking my posts. Enjoying yours. I'll be back.
Great call, Red!
Just saw it hit $1.45!!! The SHORTERS are starting to quake. Sano and Pumper should consider their risk window is growing by the minute. Time to bail, guys!
Oh, and BUY ZERO before you lose both your pants and shirts!
Long & Strong ZERO!!!
Shrimclim
Redskin1, I like your enthusiasm...
Take a look at the following excerpt from STWA's PR this week:
"STWA...has scheduled a road show which includes a series of meetings in London, Geneva and Zurich from May 17th through May 30th, 2013."
If you'll recall the last time we had a significant runup (8 months ago), note that ZERO ran for the weeks that Cecil et al were on the road making calls on prospective customers in the energy patch. That history is instructive regarding the next 2 weeks of trading. YES, Cecil et al once again will be making calls, this time in Europe, informing moneyed energy industry execs and hedge fund managers about the potential of AOT and by extension ZERO's stock investment prospects.
Methinks we've got a nice runup in ZERO to look forward to over the next 2 trading weeks.
Go ZERO!!! Lookout SHORTERS!!! It's time to COVER!!!
Shrimclim
Alkaline: Thank you for your intelligent questions...
Why would STWA try to interest investors in simply buying stock on the public market? How does that make sense? Since when should that be a priority?
Great NEWS! How about there emphasis in this part of the release?
"We are taking this opportunity to update our network of direct investors in Europe on recent corporate developments, including our strengthened balance sheet, which produced the best financial statement in the Company's history. We are not looking to fund raise from outside sources.
No more dilution. This is a very carefully inserted message for all of us stalwart investors, IMO. GO ZERO!!!
Food for POSITIVE thoughts about STWA's very near future:
Worldwide Pipeline Construction: Crude, products plans push 2013 construction sharply higher02/04/2013
By Christopher E. Smith
Pipeline Editor “Oil & Gas Journal”
www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-02/special-report--worldwide-pipeline-construction/worldwide-pipeline-construction-crude-products.html
Planned pipeline construction to be completed in 2013 jumped 73% from the previous year, with sharply higher levels of planned crude and products pipelines more than countering somewhat softer natural gas pipeline construction plans.
Operators plan to complete installation of 15,358 miles in 2013 alone (Table 1), with crude and product construction's combined share of the plans (more than 9,195 miles) making up nearly 60.5% of the total, based on reports from the world's pipeline operating companies and data collected by Oil & Gas Journal.
Looking forward to beyond 2013, however, for the fifth consecutive year less mileage is planned than had been the previous year, as gas pipeline plans softened in almost all regions.
This shrinkage in natural gas pipeline plans was consistent with 2013-only plans. But long-term construction plans (beyond 2013) saw products line plans relatively flat from the year before as NGL lines in the US begin to be completed.
Larger long-term crude pipeline plans in Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa boosted beyond-2013 crude miles by 14% from global totals the previous year.
Planned product pipeline construction for beyond 2013 registered sharp decreases in the US.
As a whole, combining both current-year and forward estimates (Fig. 1), the US, Canada, Europe, and Africa saw increases in planned construction, with decreases in all other regions.
As 2013 began, operators had announced plans to build more than 44,800 miles of crude oil, product, and natural gas pipelines extending into the next decade, a 1.7% decrease from data reported the previous year (OGJ, Feb. 6, 2012, p. 102). The majority (nearly 66%) of these plans is still for natural gas, but this segment continues to contract globally relative to crude and products.
Outlook
The downturn in worldwide pipeline construction trends reflects US Energy Information Administration energy consumption forecasts, which show a slowdown in expected growth.
EIA forecast world marketed energy consumption to increase by 53% through 2035 (using a 2008 baseline), a period that encompasses the long-term pipeline construction projections stated here.
Energy demand growth will be strongest, according to the September 2011 analysis (the EIA did not publish an International Energy Outlook in 2012), among countries not members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (non-OECD), where economic growth remains high, driven in part by strong capital inflows and high commodity prices. Non-OECD growth will be led by China and India where combined energy use will more than double over the projection period to make up 31% of total global demand by 2035. China's energy demand will be 68% higher than US energy demand by the end of the projection period.
Fuelling this energy demand growth is projected gross domestic product growth in non-OECD Asia of 5.3%/year through 2035—led by China at 5.7%/year, the highest projected growth rate in the world—compared with 3.4%/year worldwide. China's rate of growth is slightly lower than EIA projections from a year earlier, while non-OECD Asia and worldwide growth were both higher than year-earlier estimates.
Structural issues that have implications for medium to long-term growth in China include the pace of reform affecting inefficient state-owned companies and a banking system carrying a large number of nonperforming loans, according to the EIA. The development of domestic capital markets to help macroeconomic stability and ensure China's large savings are used efficiently supports medium-term growth projections, said the EIA.
EIA described the acceleration of structural reforms as essential to stimulating potential growth and reducing poverty in India over the mid to long-term. Even so, EIA projects 5.5%/year GDP growth in India 2008-35, up from 5.0% the previous year.
In December 2012 the EIA forecast up and down movement in US liquid fuels consumption through 2040, rising to 19.8 million b/d by 2019 (from 18.9 million b/d in 2011) before dropping back to 18.9 million b/d by 2040. Biofuels consumption increases over most of the projection period.
EIA projects US oil production climbing more than 31.5% from 5.7 million b/d in 2011 to 7.5 million b/d in 2019 and remaining greater than 6 million b/d through 2040, with production increases stemming from tight onshore formations.
The agency increased its cumulative production of dry natural gas estimate for 2011-35 from its Annual Energy Outlook 2012 forecast by 8%, primarily reflecting continued increases in shale gas production. It projects 2040 US production of roughly 34 tcf.
The 2013 outlook projects the US becoming a net exporter of LNG in 2016 and an overall net exporter of natural gas in 2020. EIA sees LNG exports from new liquefaction capacity peaking at 4.5 bcfd in 2027 and net pipeline exports beginning in 2021 as imports from Canada fall steadily and net pipeline exports to Mexico grow by 387%.
For projects completed after 2013 (Table 2), companies plan to lay more than 44,800 miles of line and spend roughly $144 billion. When these companies looked beyond 2012 last year, they anticipated spending roughly $203 billion to lay more than 45,500 miles of line. Construction costs dropped in the meantime to $3.1-million/mile from $4.4-million/mile.
• Projections for 2013 pipeline mileage reflect only projects likely to be completed by yearend 2013, including construction in progress at the start of the year or set to begin during it.
• Projections for mileage after 2013 include construction that might begin in 2013 but be completed later.
Also included are some long-term projects judged as probable, even if they will not break ground until after 2013.
US average cost-per-mile for onshore pipeline construction (Table 4, OGJ, Sept. 3, 2012, p. 118) on FERC applications submitted by June 30, 2012, was $3.1 million. There were no offshore applications submitted.
US average cost-per-mile for offshore construction (Table 7, OGJ, Sept. 14, 2009, p. 69) on projects completed in the 12 months ending June 30, 2009, was $5.37 million. These costs were used again in this year's report due to the absence of offshore filings to FERC in the 12 months ending June 30, 2010, 2011, or 2012.
Based on historical analysis and a few exceptions and variations notwithstanding, these projections assume that 90% of all construction will be onshore and 10% offshore and that pipelines 32 in. OD or larger are onshore projects.
Following is a breakdown of projected costs, using these assumptions and OGJ pipeline-cost data:
• Total onshore construction (14,290 miles) for 2013 only will cost more than $44 billion:
—$578 million for 4-10 in.
—$15.8 billion for 12-20 in.
—$13.4 billion for 22-30 in.
—$14.5 billion for 32 in. and larger.
• Total offshore construction (1,068 miles) for 2013 only will cost more than $5.7 billion:
—$111 million for 4-10 in.
—$3 billion for 12-20 in.
—$2.6 billion for 22-30 in.
• Total onshore construction (42,565 miles) for beyond 2013 will cost nearly $132 billion:
—$2.9 billion for 4-10 in.
—$19.7 billion for 12-20 in.
—$41 billion for 22-30 in.
—$68.4 billion for 32 in. and larger.
• Total offshore construction (2,270 miles) for beyond 2013 will cost more than $12 billion:
—$558 million for 4-10 in.
—$3.8 billion for 12-20 in.
—$7.9 billion for 22-30 in.
Action
What follows is a quick rundown of some of the major projects in each of the world's regions.
Pipeline construction projects mirror end users' energy demands, and much of that demand continues to center on natural gas, with the industry remaining focused on how to get that gas to market as quickly and efficiently as possible. The following sections look at both natural gas and liquids pipelines.
Crude
TransCanada announced plans in July 2008 for the Keystone Gulf Coast Expansion Project (Keystone XL), providing additional capacity of 500,000 b/d from western Canada to the US Gulf Coast by 2012. The expansion would boost the Keystone system's capacity to 1.1-million b/d at a total capital cost of about $12.2 billion. Keystone XL secured initial firm, long-term contracts for 380,000 b/d for an average of 17 years from shippers.
Keystone XL would include 1,980 miles of 36-in. OD line starting in Hardisty, Alta., and extending to delivery near existing terminals in Port Arthur, Tex. XL will also include 41 pump stations—33 in the US and 8 in Canada—at roughly 50-mile intervals. Each station will use two-to-three 6,500 hp electric pumps, providing up to 19,500 hp/station. Each station could be expanded to 32,500 hp as part of boosting the combined Keystone system's throughput to 1.5 million b/d.
Keystone XL, however, became embroiled in US domestic politics, with the administration of President Barack Obama in November 2011 deferring a decision on the pipeline until 2013 to consider environmental concerns regarding its routing through Nebraska. In May 2012, TransCanada submitted a new application to the US Department of State for the project and in September the company filed a new route for the pipeline, bypassing the Sandhills region, with Nebraska's Department of Environmental Quality. The State Dept. is to make a decision later this quarter.
TransCanada in the meantime began work on its Gulf Coast Project crude oil pipeline between Cushing, Okla., and Nederland, Tex., despite both the delays to Keystone XL (of which the Gulf Coast Project would be a component) and plans to reverse the Seaway pipeline to deliver crude along a similar route. TransCanada separated the Gulf Coast Project from Keystone XL in February 2012 and in July received the final of three key permits needed from the US Army Corps of Engineers to advance the 485-mile pipeline (OGJ Online, July 27, 2012). It expects to place the pipeline in service by late this year.
Enbridge bought ConocoPhillips's share of Seaway, joining with EPP in its ownership and jointly announcing that its flow would be reversed to deliver crude from Cushing to the Gulf Coast. Initial capacity of the reversed pipeline was 150,000 b/d, with expansion to 400,000 b/d completed in January 2013. Seaway plans to reach a final capacity of 850,000 b/d by mid-2014.
Enbridge is also building its Flanagan South Project between Flanagan, Ill., and a connection with Seaway at Cushing. The company currently operates the 193,300-b/d Spearhead Pipeline along this route. The 600 mile, 36-in. OD Flanagan South line will open mid-2014 with 600,000 b/d capacity, expandable to 800,000 b/d.
Enbridge plans to build the Northern Gateway Pipeline to transport 525,000 b/d of oil sands crude from near Edmonton, Alta., to a tanker terminal in British Columbia for shipment to China, other parts of Asia, and California. A line running parallel to the crude line would ship 193,000 b/d of condensate from the coast to Alberta.
Enbridge expects to build Northern Gateway in 2013-16, pending regulatory approval of filings made in 2009. Commissioning and start-up would occur 2014-15. Enbridge would also operate the Kitimat terminal. It would have 2 mooring berths, 14 storage tanks for petroleum and condensate, and be called on by roughly 225 ships/year.
British Columbia Premier Christy Clark, however, declared in July 2012 that the environmental risks of the project outweigh its economic benefits and asked that B.C. be compensated for allowing the pipeline to cross. The pipeline was already encountering opposition from environmentalist groups.
That same month Northern Gateway announced additional measures to ensure pipeline integrity, including increased WT, more remote-operated isolation valves, more in-line inspections, and staffing at remotely located pump stations.
Products
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP will build and operate a 136-mile, 16-in. OD pipeline to transport gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel from refineries in Norco, La., to an existing petroleum transportation hub in Collins, Miss., owned by Plantation Pipe Line Co. From this hub, the products can move to major markets in the southeastern US.
Kinder Morgan is partnering with Valero Energy Corp. in the joint venture. The pipeline will have an initial capacity of 110,000 b/d with the ability to expand to more than 200,000 b/d. Kinder Morgan began building the pipeline in August 2012 and expects it to be in service September 2013.
MentalFLOSS - Thanks for the pictorial history of the AOT's evolution. It's a GREAT sight to behold to anyone who's LONG this stock.
MentalFLOSS - Thanks for the pictorial history of the AOT's evolution. It's a GREAT sight to behold to anyone who's LONG this stock.
Congrats, ZEROphiles!
I know, I'm a little late to the party this am, but here's what stands out for me. This is FANTASTIC NEWS!!! 1) All certifications for use of this device on US pipelines are COMPLETE! 2) Manufacturing sequence is now READY for full scale production orders! 3) AOT 000001 is “shown being SHIPPED” perhaps to a new customer for a live pipeline test? 4) “…working closely with intellectual property partners, potential customers…” perhaps in response to forthcoming contracts?
Also, we already have 160,000 shares traded at 9:00 am. That's more than 1/2 our daily avg. Going to be a GOOD day!
Hang in there, boys and girls. We’re soon to have a great ride in the sky with ZERO!!!
STWA Strategic Objectives Update
SANTA BARBARA, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/06/13 -- STWA, Inc. (OTCBB: ZERO) ("STWA" or the "Company"), a developer of applied efficiency technology solutions for oil and fuel delivery systems in the multi-billion dollar global energy market, today announced progress towards its 2013 strategic objectives including achievements putting the Company closer to listing on a national exchange and advancements for commercial implementation of AOT™ Midstream. My comment: WHEN THIS UPLIST OCCURS, LOOK OUT PRICE!!!
According to published documents describing NASDAQ's listing guidelines, STWA meets various criteria including: Market Value of Publicly Held Shares; Market Value of Listed Securities; Operating History; Publicly Held Shares; Market Makers; and Shareholders, and is actively making progress towards meeting Corporate Governance, Board Development, Stockholders Equity and Net Tangible Assets criteria. Meeting these criteria is critical to STWA's pursuit of its desire to move to a larger trading platform.
As an additional move towards a trading platform change, STWA has increased its number to two independent directors, in anticipation of meeting National Exchanges' requirements for an independent director majority. STWA has also retained Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP to manage the legal aspects of the pending trading exchange uplist. My comment: THIS IS HUGE!!!
In its recently filed Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, STWA reported a $6.2 million improvement in its shareholders' equity which increased to a stockholders' equity of $3.3 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2013, from a stockholders' deficiency of $(2.9) million on December 31, 2012. The Company's cash position also increased by $2.9 million to $4.5 million in quarter ended March 31, 2013, from $1.6 million on December 31, 2012. The increase in these assets represents a material advancement towards meeting listing requirements for national exchanges.
In the past year the Company has raised roughly $8 million through warrant exercises from existing investors. The exercise and expiration of warrants has increased the cash position as well as shareholders equity position of the Company and reduced its derivative liabilities. As of the end of the first quarter, the Company has warrants vested and exercisable that would result in roughly an additional $8 million in funding upon exercise.
Advancement Towards Commercial Implementation of AOT™
During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, STWA increased the number of major multi-national companies with which is it under non-disclosure agreements for implementation of AOT™ Midstream, from five to seven. My comment: THIS TOO IS HUGE!!!
The Company has seen progress in formal negotiations with these entities towards implementation of the AOT™ technology to operations both domestic and abroad. The recent completion of ASME certification for STWA's AOT™ Midstream was an important milestone in meeting installation requirements from both the companies interested in the new product and their governmental regulatory body counterparts.
"STWA has never been on stronger footing," stated STWA CEO Cecil Bond Kyte. "Not only have we created a new and novel cutting-edge product that the industry needs and wants, but we have succeeded in building a strong corporate foundation at the same time. Both of these efforts have yielded a company poised for explosive success. We look forward to 2013 being a monumental year."
JT - Would selling at $20 be advised under all NEWS scenarios?
Just trying to have in place a rational SELL strategy BEFORE the inevitable skyrockets go off, and we're making decsions in split seconds.
Under the $20 run up "ON THE NEWS" scenario, you suggested selling and then buying back on a dip "because there's always a dip." Okay, makes sense to me. However, "THE NEWS" could include many possibilities. What about selling on the news in each of these scenarios?
1.) NEWS that ZERO has signed its first contract of significance?
2.) NEWS that ZERO has met NASDAQ uplist requirements?
3.) NEWS that HAL is buying ZERO?
Are each of these scenarios equivalent, in your estimation, as it relates to selling immediately on the run up and buying back when the dip follows shortly thereafter?
Thanks for doing your part to keep everyone calm under fire!
I totally hear you, JT!
I'm getting the same email/phone traffic. My response to them is that you have to know your risk profile in this world of penny stock investing. If you don't know your risk profile, you should sell and walk away while you've got a little profit from the last run up. It's your decision not mine.
SNAP,JT!!!
JT, I must say...
If your "23-day Trading" Theory proves to be consistently accurate, it is AWESOME!
Thanks for sharing!
Cheers,
Shrimclim
Invest_Her: Welcome and DITTOS to what Ski advises...
JT is the true expert here. The rest of us are just a little further along the learning curve than you with a few more years of good and bad trades under our collective belts. Hang on to ZERO! It's a once in a generation play, IMO.
Let's learn together!
Cheers,
Shrimclim
Thankski!
Myrka/Alky - You 2 are out there...
Look! A CEO of Cecil's caliber does NOT buy 7% of a company and an equal number of years of his life just to sell patents (and walk away) or giveaway its AOT (for pennies on the dollar) after ALL OF THE TESTING the Chinese and Temple U. have done to prove its worth. Get real!
Just be patient. It will be rewarded in time.
Shrimclim
JT - CONGRATS on finding the pennystock Philosopher's Stone!...Question: So it's impossible to predict the heat map without my process.
Does this suggest that someday you MAY be able to predict indvividual ticker movement?
Cheers to you!
Shrimclim
JT, I'm pulling for you finding the Philosopher's Stone!
Mr. Broderick...This is precisely WHY this is GREAT NEWS!
Whether you're a ZERO-zealot and don't want Cecil to sell the company to anyone or you're a ZERO-investor who wants the best deal possible in a potential acquisition, this is great news.
Why? Because Cecil's 7% ownership and climbing is going to give him LEVERAGE in either situation. Just pray that he's in your camp and that he's an honorable man who will do the right thing for shareholders either way.
Cheers,
Shrimclim
I'm with JT on this...
In STWA's PR of 2/20/13 they make the following statement:
"The technology is creating a buzz within the industry right now, as pipeline growth within North America is unprecedented and the sector is desperately seeking solutions like AOT™ to meet the accelerating demands of the midstream infrastructure. This first unit has been manufactured with specific end users in mind. We have developed this product with a lot of feedback and insight from our commercial relationships and supply chain members, and look forward to a very bright 2013."
It seems to me that IF 2013 is going to be "bright,"
STWA must do some kind of deal soon. Otherwise, they couldn't generate enough interest in their stock to make this year a success in the months that remain.
IMO, great investor news MUST be in the offing.
Cheers,
Shrimclim
I'll play your lottery...April 15th.
I have a different take on a rising pps...
I see a rising pps as a good thing, perhaps even a precursor to the announcement of a contract or at least progress toward the signing of an contract. If STWA signs their first contract shortly, there most assuredly swill be shorts engaged, but it will be the shorts soiling themselves in their shorts as the ensuing "short squeeze" evaporates their capital in a matter of days.
Cheers,
Shrimclim