still holding.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The negatigers were trying to say that CEO was unreliable and that Punch wouldn't be PRed tomorrow. Or something like that. LONG TERM ----
I was waiting for the jim234 to toss 'em into my net. Oh well. Easier to slap the ASK from this restaurant than to monitor the bids. Thanks for the shares, NITE.
It's cool, hawkeye. I got 'em @ .035. Had to go to lunch. Geaux Tigers!!!!
Ain't that great? I was sitting on BID with the net out in the .0320s. Couldn't have waited ten minutes Steve? LOL!
SHHHHH!!! We're trying to listen...
I understand what you are saying, but we haven't been waiting for these things for "months." I haven't, anyway. I can tell you that I have been here for months and in those (few) months I've watched the value of my ICPA position grow by a factor of ten. Not too shabby.
The social media clues are just Samblis having fun with fans that like social media. I have no problem with it. I wish I could tell you something, I really do. I mean, Samblis said as recently as yesterday that the ball is in CC's court as far as that PR. There is nothing more he can say regarding that. Can't expect the guy to release a PR stating that he can't release a PR until CC releases a PR. If a stock I'm in needs to release a weekly PR I am out. And I mean OUT!.. Still comfy here.
If you remember, there were a LOT more clues earlier this year. My guess is CC called him onto the carpet for talking in class back in April.
tried to buy an 888 but was too late.
When you fluctuate 10% or more on the day you are going to attract traders. Doesn't mean longs aren't still accumulating in the mean time.
How did you find out about these things months ago?
NITE's been soakin' 'em up on BID.
discounting higher orders from same mms, aon's, under 5ks, and orders yet to be placed, etc. yes.
trade @ .0342 was for 40K shares. SMH.
full on double rainbow all the way!
Good times, great oldies!
I remember that!
Wow. Nice work... shows how a little heavy lifting can change perspective. ;)
At least it was on the ASK. Boogie man whacks IMO
WOW!!! 28%???? REALLY?
Why would you want it to close red? ... creeeepy!
Yep. That's the same thing I thought when I read that!
Can't wait to hear about the expansions to the deal!
I found all the information Rich should need right here:
LINK
Looks like it's time for "you-know-who" to grab the shovel again!
Man I gotta move up north. "Enjoying June" isn't said too much around here...
Take a few days to look for a form 3,4, or 5. Come back in a week or so and let us know what you find!
You have NOTHING on ICPA and it's killing you, I suspect.
because he was long then. Hahahaha!!!
What are we supposed to think? That he's some naive investor who changes his mind weekly? LOLOL!!
RICH Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!
He's reaching hard. Poor guy.
OMG, Rich!! What should you do?!?!
You're really grasping at this point, huh?
What's your native language>?
How do you know that's a long on the BID?
I'd hate for my trading to require me to post on the internet.
Oh I know who it was. Just seems like shorty was insinuating that it was ICPA, which it was NOT.
right, but WHO was doing the pumping?
dmlabuda, you've said over and over again that news doesn't affect the price of a stock, but I've also heard you say a few times "buy on rumor sell on news." We've all heard it, but to hear you saying that one should time buys/sells based on news makes you hard to understand in light of your "news does not affect the price of a stock" mantra.
Also, you say that only aggressive buying and selling changes the price of a stock. What, in your opinion, causes aggressive buying and selling?
When you should buy depends on when you intend to sell, but yes, there is much $$ to be made here IMO.