Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sounds like that guy Erik Caldwell A couple years ago before the run up to .03.
Go BRAV!!
GO BRAV!!!
Yep, the train left first station. at next stop so some probably want to hop on here before train pulls out headed to next one.
I agree
Another myth shot down In that Obama's economy is supposedly a part time economy. 59 consecutive months of private sector job growth, 11.8 new jobs created, 3 million jobs created in 2014 alone, wages growing 2.2% faster than inflation, stock market still setting records, and republicans cannot take any credit as they've opposed everything since they took the house in 2010. Unemployment ticked up due to people that had given up on finding jobs re-entering the search for jobs. Running (really have ran) out of ammo. Ironically them continuing to oppose just paves way for the first three straight terms for Democrat president In a long long time if ever.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/02/06/msnbcs-chris-hayes-debunks-right-wing-medias-my/202454
Very selective on what desired to be believed. Either the number is trusted or not. If not then unemployment total wasn't 11.1 million in Dec 2008. Can't just pick and choose when you want to believe the numbers. Well I guess some can.
In December, the number of unemployed persons increased by 632,000 to 11.1 million and the unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has grown by 3.6 million, and the unemployment rate has risen by 2.3 percentage points.
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/jan/wk2/art02.htm
The unemployment rate, at 5.7 percent, changed little in January and has shown no net
change since October. The number of unemployed persons, at 9.0 million, was little
changed in January. (See table A-1. See the note at the end of this news release and
tables B and C for information about annual population adjustments to the household
survey estimates.)
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Job and Wage Gains as Americans Rejoin the Work Force
Average hourly earnings rose 0.5 percent in January, the biggest monthly gain in more than six years, though it followed a disappointing drop in December. Over the last 12 months, wages advanced at a 2.2 percent pace, significantly ahead of the inflation rate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/07/business/economy/jobs-unemployment-figures.html?_r=0
DA may turn out after time to be a genius with the approach he's taken in not putting all eggs in one basket. Continuing to try new avenues in accumulating multiple revenue stings. In today's market imo, it is necessary to move with it. Refuse to be stiff and stuck in thinking what path you're on is the only one. We'll see. This year imo will tell the tell.
Go Brav!!!
It's pretty clear but thanks for you focused, dedicated and relentless input in this so called failed stock. Come on man!!!
Go Brav!!
No they do want shares, they just want them at a cheaper. Why else sell 5-11k shares. 11,000×.0016=$17.60 trading fees are between 5-10 bucks. You're gonna sell $17 worth of shares which cost you at least $5. Can you smell it now?
Someone wants in or more badly. 5-11k sales hitting almost daily now. Funny to watch.
Well maybe not a full recession but the deficit trippled due to his tax cuts and was one of the reasons for the reverse and raised taxes 11 times.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/devout-police-supporter-change-heart-arrested-nypd-bogus-charge/
Changing one citizen at a time. Ashame it takes personal experience to get it though. How it normally goes though. Can't see the issue and the struggle because they can't put themselves in other's shoes until they are actually are in them. Police are out of control. People wake up to it once they understand they're no longer special.
Bernie Sanders Obliterates The Republican Job Creator Myth At Senate Hearing
Mr. Chairman: This is not just a moral issue, it is an economic issue. Seventy percent of our economy is based on consumer spending, and when working people don’t earn enough income, they are not spending money. They are not buying products or services. The “job creators” in this country are not the heads of corporations. They can’t sell products and services unless people have the income to buy them. The real job creators are those millions of Americans who every day go out and purchase goods and services – and if they don’t have adequate income, the economy suffers.
This simple phenomenon, that an economy cannot do well unless there is low-unemployment and decent wages, impacts not only the lives of ordinary people, but also our deficit and national debt — and important government programs like Social Security. In other words, if we are going to reduce the deficit, we have got to make sure that every American who is willing to work hard is able to get a decent-paying job.
The debate we are having this morning will have a profound impact on the lives of the American people. The Republican philosophy of cutting Social Security, cutting Medicare, cutting Medicaid, cutting nutrition programs for hungry kids, while providing huge tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires would move this country in exactly the wrong direction.
On the other hand, if we are serious about rebuilding the disappearing middle class, reducing income and wealth inequality, and strengthening Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid we need a budget that creates millions of jobs, raises wages, makes college more affordable, and demands that the wealthiest people in this country pay their fair share. In all of these matters, the President’s budget moves this country in the right direction.
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02/03/bernie-sanders-obliterates-republican-job-creator-myth-senate-hearing.html
We all know that taxes are enevitable But conservatives... what do you call taxes taken from lower and middle class families and are then used for corporate kick backs, building stadiums for professional sports teams, handover to farmers that are already wealthy in form of subsidies programs, funding government programs for working class people that are working for companies that choose to pay less than survivable wages.
I'll help.. it's called redistribution of wealth. You see redistribution will happen regardless. The wool being pulled over many people's eyes is it all about which direction it's going. Conservatives advocate for bottom to top redistribution progressives advocates for top to bottom. It's as simple as that Because in the end no one in political office truly wants small government. They may want a powerless government on regulating industries but not small in revenues. Believe it if you want. Small government means smaller salaries for congressmen, smaller military, less revenue to give out to corporations and lobbyists in form of subsidies, less hand out in ways of government contract where projects are funded by the government to employ corporations. He'll who benifits most the keystone pipe line? Yes it will receive subsidies and yes tax payers will compensate/pay for it. This being when a single entity stands to benefits monetary with no comparison to other benefits for normal citizens for the whole project. So taking a project and giving it a 1 Billion dollar tax break but to make up for that one billion dollars shortage you use tax revenues gathered overwhelmingly from the working class when the main benefactor is a private company. Isn't that called redistribution of wealth? This is the cycle and we're not talking $200-300 dollars a month like for food stamps or welfare, we're talking millions sometimes billions a pop. Jobs are very seldom connected to corporate subsidies. ( Message!!! *Anytime in history where taxes have been drastically lowered on a national or a state level shortly after a recession almost always follows *fact*)
So while many harp on this redistribution of wealth thing keeps bringing it up as some cardinal sin or the ultimate betrayal relax. It's going to happen regardless. It's really what you believe is more important as a human. Literally Human survival in most cases or our corporations' happiness.
Another reason to be liberal/progressive. Funny. May buy yourself a few more years. Probably the hate thing causing it .
http://www.medicaldaily.com/liberal-vs-conservative-lifespans-one-tends-live-longer-other-no-one-knows-why-320258
I can't stand Jesse Jackson. Agree that he's an opportunist and he use race issues to profit. Sorry example for a civil rights advocate. Fact
DOJ (Eric Holder) having S&P to pay almost 1.4 billion in fines for financial crisis and housing market collapse.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/s-p-settles-government-allegations-for-about-1-38b/
First I'd ask what isn't true in the article.
yes proud of what republican did and that they actually stood for something once. but also wanted to show that a lot of there stances swayed and seemed to be based only on who's in the white house. A lot of the things conservative politians are fighting against and try to bubble up base for now, it's believed would not be as big an issue if they were in control.
Secondly the intent was to show how far they've shifted from their own values because of money and lobbyist's influence. Case in point (to tap on the couple excerpt you took) The EPA was a republican idea and implemented by them and was good until it got in the way of the big fossil fuel industry. Abortion was not touted on party lines before now you run the risk of being primaried if as a republican you show any support for right to choose. Doesn't matter what your constituacy thinks. Only matters what the big money PAC's think. So the Republican party has been hijacked by a small few of powerful donors that has the power to sway their talking points and values. they no longer care if they are a senator in NC and the majority of their constituacy wants a minimum wage increase because the bulk of there campaign funding comes from kansas. case in point polls in most conservative states last cycle agreed with minimum wage increase, right to choose, viewed ACA more positively than negatively, agreed on making marijuana legal, didn't care if same sex marriage is legal and more but for some reason conservative politicians are in unison in being against them.
The p.s. you wrote I have no idea what you were attempting there so will leave it where it is.
Lol. Well on paper Reagan's administration was most corrupt.
Reagan: Most corrupt administration in american history fact. 138 convictions or indictments or were subjects to investigations of misconduct. Attempt to whitewash his presidency was and is tragic.
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2005/10/17/157477/-List-of-Reagan-administration-convictions
Exploding heads underway
http://www.alternet.org/10-facts-will-blow-right-wingers-minds
Gosh!! 16% approval rating for congress. At least it's probably slightly better than herpes, dial up internet, head lice and cockroaches.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/180113/2014-approval-congress-remains-near-time-low.aspx
Nice try but we got you!!! Lol
http://www.msnbc.com/politicsnation/watch/gop-s-obama-predictions-gone-wrong-380828739773
Very very good article. Connects all dots since memory fails us all sometimes.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2014/11/conservative-nonsense-political-history
Thank goodness we can count on the consistency of conservatives being almost always wrong.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/01/01/3607416/4-things-2015-obama-reelected/
Those who complain about welfare and other government program I wonder why they take no issues on how corporations receive billions of dollars yearly. the overwelming majority do not even need the cash. Let me get this straight. The so called Judeo Christian right who follows the ways of our savior Jesus Choose to stand behind corporations receiving free money that obviously is not used to help people but raises an eye brow when someone gets food stamps to feed themselves and there kids. Or agree when GOP desires to wants to drop pension or social security benifits that can make or break a senior that's just looking to enjoy their retirement years or agree with anything that would further cause disadvantage to people that already can't afford it. What would Jesus Do? Not this.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/taxanalysts/2014/03/14/where-is-the-outrage-over-corporate-welfare/
People talk all this crap about socialism and redistributing wealth. As if it's a bad word or way of thinking but the absolute true is this country's greatest period of sustaining economic growth was born out of socialist policy contributions. It's best to know your history as not be fooled into thinking fantasy. Everyone knows that after world War II the rich were taxed at 99% in order to create the revenues needed for programs the grow what is now known as the middle class. Denying this is denying fact. Now while I'm not a socialist myself I feel that without social programs most of us would not be where we are today. Like I said most of us are no more than 2 generations removed from benefiting from some government program like the GI Bill which was funded by the tax policies created back in the 40's/50's. We cannot say that social policies are evil and at same time say the greatest middle class was built during period where the most extreme social policies this country has seen were implemented. There's no running away from the historical data. Also we know that as soon as taxes were lowered to 29% in the 80's was the same time wages staggered and the decline of the middle class in sued. Those are the facts like it or not. I know a lot of conservatives like to believe they have it right and it's their way or burst but history shows otherwise. A combination of both is required and it depends on where we are of which way we should be leaning. Tax Cut For Rich IS Not The direction We should Be leaning. rather we should go back to policies during period right after WWII and try what's proven to work.
The truth about how the US middle class was created after WWII
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-maher-goes-after-gop-for-pretending-to-care-about-middle-class/
We're talking company forward looking statements on promises or mentions of strategic actions to push company forward. Financial releases really doesn't fit the bill of what I'm talking about.
Income inequality and the destruction of the middle class started in 1980 according to historical data. Grape shows a joining steady rise for all three classes until around 1980. What happened in 1980-81 that changes wages for lower and middle class americans?
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3629
I feel pretty good about where my money is. The follow through argument is a year or two old. He hasn't promised anything lately that he's hasn't at least turned around and explained if didn't happen. You have the ones that think nothing good will happen that's holding and those that do that are holding. All others are irrelevant. We will see what happens.
Saying it over and over and over again doesn't make it true. We'll I take that back I guess it can make it true in your mind like people who have jumped out of windows after telling themselves over and over they can fly.