Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I know better but here goes...
Please explain where and how the content gets delivered to the 5G network.
Your comment regarding the trading of TMMI's stock is pointless. Please explain why the nominal 500 share trade took place below the current bid?
I think this update from the website is newsworthy. Unfortunately, communication from the company is sorely lacking (and unlike some here, whose sole presence here is to spread fear and doubt) I can only attribute this reticence due to issues beyond their control that have led to missed deadlines. This latest update on the tech is huge from my perspective and I see multiple avenues to revenue.
This will not end well for the naked short position that has eternally boxed in TMMI's share price at 2 cents. Think about it, the public float is upwards of 360 million shares yet the average volume on any given day is less than a hundred thousand shares. Anyone who understands public floats on the Pink Sheet Market has to acknowledge this is an aberration. For the few of us left that have hung in here this long, there may finally be that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow we have all longed for.
"just wondered if any hope left for this one at all? Or everyone given up?"
This is why I am still here...
https://www.tmmi.us/TRUREZ.php
One would think someone with such vast knowledge would have figured that out by now, even when it's been spelled out for him numerous times.
Sheesh!!
Just as I thought, you're a Biochemistry Expert as well. As for attempting to respond to your recent diatribe, it seems I've misplaced my gibberish glasses and therefore unable to oblige you.
Enough already.
"It is all nonsense."
Really? Not only are you software engineering expert you're now a Biochemistry expert as well. It's clearly apparent you didn't even bother to read the article that duckncover posted and are clueless to the fact that TMMI's target market is not upscaling videos on cell phones.
Let me add this for you to read...
Internationally recognized Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, is a published and widely cited scientist on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields and speaks internationally on this topic. Is considered an expert in how wireless radiation impacts the electrical systems in our bodies having published 7 studies showing there exists exquisite sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the voltage sensor in each cell, such that the force impacting our cells at the voltage sensor has massive impact on the biology on the cells of our bodies [1-7]. These papers are discussed in over 360,000 web sites which can be easily found by Googling (Martin Pall electromagnetic).
Dr. Martin Pall discusses the dangers of 5G; some key excerpts are listed below:
“EMFs act by activating channels in the membrane that surrounds each of our cells, called voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). The EMFs put forces on the voltage sensor that controls the VGCCs of about 7.2 million times greater than the forces on other charged groups in our cells. This is why weak EMFs have such large biological effects on the cells of our bodies.
Pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, more biologically active and therefore more dangerous than are non-pulsed (continuous wave) EMFs. All cordless communication devices communicate via pulsations because it is the pulsations that carry the information communicated.
5G will be much more active in activating the VGCCs and producing health impacts because of its rapid absorption by materials in the body, because of its very rapid pulsations and because of the huge number antennae they are planning to put up, at least 200 times the number of antennae from all current cell phone towers. What this means is that the impacts on the outer one to two inches of our bodies will be massive.”
Among the major ill-effects we will likely see some time after the introduction of 5G, according to Dr. Pall, include increases in blindness, hearing loss, male infertility, skin cancers, thyroid issues, and nervous system dysfunction.
Enough already tmmifooled.
Bravo Patrick Byrne!! One of the rare honest people in this rat infested industry who tells it like it is.
"Duh...."
I rest my case. lol
Yep.
I believe he's cut and pasted (well almost) a response as to why on some 4K TVs there is stuttering and pixelization on the screen due to early delivery of 4K TVs that did not have the proper HDMI input to handle a 4K signal.
"If you're still confused read a book...."
As usual, when you post confusion reigns supreme. You may want to reread Urban's question.
Hint... It has nothing to do with 4K TVs.
"I could only imagine where TMMI TRUDEF would of been today
if only they had teamed up with MSFT....
Inside MSFT Surface Pro,
is where they should be today...."
Uhmm Jay, it already plays in the MSFT Surface Pro screen which by the way isn't 4K and highly doubt we'll see an 8K screen anytime soon so no, it isn't where TMMI should be today.
Imagine what could happen if this lowly pink sheet stock that took over "70 trades today" representing approximately 165K shares in total to achieve maybe 3500 dollars worth of stock traded, can potentially sell a product that has blue sky revenues ahead of it?
This ought to be good.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/14/uber-underwriters-worried-about-the-ipo-deployed-unusual-naked-short.html
No newbie, you're on the correct board, you've just forgotten your put on your gibberish glasses.
Thnx.
I think people are getting a little carried away with this whole 5G talk. 5G is a short distance wireless technology with a range of up to 1500 feet representing the last hop in the network. It's going to require hundreds of thousands of towers all over the place and these towers will ultimately still be connected to the internet backbone. The capacity of the existing main internet trunks cannot magically be increased anytime in the near future including fiber networks under city streets as well cables crossing oceans not to mention the very expensive routing infrastructure.
As far as 5G replacing the ethernet, it'll be interesting to see how many corporations are willing to take on the liability of having their employees brain tissue being fried by sitting next to 5G wireless routers (5G works in the 24 to 90 Gigahertz frequency which many reports claim is carcinogenic). This "fast track" 5G rollout is nothing less than a massive public health experiment.
p.s. Chalk this post up as another one of my (according to some) "pump posts"
You are a complete waste of my time.
"I am sorry that you are a hopeless Toni believer, after it did not keep its promise over and over again and the total shares is over 600 millions shares and kept printing."
I'm not hopeless at all, you are. Once again you prove your lack of reading and comprehension skills as well as your exaggerations. There are not "over 600 million shares and kept printing" and by the way, in case you've missed it, the company we are talking about is TMMI not "Toni".
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TMMI/security
"No company can live on printing stock without generate revenue for too long."
Brilliant!
"Besides what those Toni board members are doing?"
I assume you are referring to TMMI's stellar advisory board? They are there in an advisory capacity to assist the company based on their particular knowledge and skillsets and their backgrounds speak for themselves. Once TMMI's product is ready for market it should become more apparent to you as to what they do, but I highly doubt it.
"Which fit my model just given"
Your model is just drivel that makes no sense at all.
Good luck with it.
"You sound that that you can see with the glass, no wonder after investing in Toni for more than 10 years this stock still go no where? Well what did you see with the glass? Technically speaking you are a very poor investor, and the glass you mentioned did not help you but mid led you"
Technically speaking you have no clue. This is why I'm here...
https://ibb.co/hVKSC9
Note the volume in just the one week period (forget the tens of millions trading daily before this week in question) leading to the 2.78 dollar spike, it represents 300 million plus shares traded (3 times TMMI's capitalization at the time).
p.s. buy low sell high.
There is "glass", you just can't see it.
Confucius says:
Man who is in need of glasses and chooses not to wear them cannot see the forest from the trees.
Jay, Jay, Jay, you can't be serious. Why on earth would you be encouraging the spreading of more FUD???
Really? SMH.
"So if confronted with rising demand, wouldn’t the felonious shorter try to change market sentiment by thrashing the stock?"
That is to be expected, please note that up until recently, the representative short basher has not had the need to make their presence felt here due to the omnipresence of "rogue shareholders" who have in essence done the thrashing for them.
"And if a dividend were declared wouldn’t they just pay it? Covering seems impossible."
I think you're looking at the "naked short" as being one entity, rather likely, there are several actors independent of one another that have found themselves in this unlikely position of having made the wrong "bet". When this occurs it will be the most vulnerable position that will trigger a short covering. This is a nasty bunch and they are known to "eat their own".
A short squeeze is a vicious cycle whereby a price increase in a security causes short sellers to cover causing a further price increase triggering more short covering. More importantly, this can be quite dramatic because short sellers face an asymmetric risk-reward ratio whereby their reward is capped but losses are theoretically unlimited especially if the overall average short position is at a substantially low price. As such, short sellers may rush for the exits when it becomes clear a stock is going to enjoy a period of price increases.
In TMMI's instance, dependent upon the success of its product offering, it is my opinion that there will be cycles of shorting and covering over an extended period of time until the exposed positions have traded their way out.
"Assuming you're right about the extent of the shorts, whenever they opt to cover there'll be desperate measures taken to keep the price down."
I believe what we are witnessing on a daily basis is just that, years of "desperate measures". If and when they cover it will be in a sense a capitulation of sorts and it will result in a much different market than what we currently see.
This article gives a good description of what I'm getting at...
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/business/goldman-sachs-denies-claims-it-led-to-copper-rivers-demise.html?_r=1&
"What I am skeptical is the extent to which abusive naked shorting explains the current price."
For TMMI the lost opportunities attributed to the interference caused by rogue shareholders cannot be underestimated. Had these rogue shareholders not falsely claim that TMMI did not own the technology that TMMI had spent millions on in development there may not have been such an aggressive naked short position created to target the company for extinction, TMMI could have continued developing its technology during the infancy stages of providing video content to the internet. At the time TMMI was considered one of the early pioneers in this growing market segment and years of valuable development time was lost.
When one looks at the converging acts of the rogue shareholders and fund managers that targeted TMMI, I think the case can be made to show the extent of how the abusive naked shorting has led to the current share price, as their continuous presence in TMMI's market can only lead me to believe that the position they are protecting is of considerable size and concern.
"Also, if there is a huge number of falsified shares out there, created before Reg Sho and grandfathered, I’m not sure what can be done about it. If as you say the total number exceeds the capitalization of Tmmi, isn’t it mathematically impossible to ‘undillute’ and ‘purify’ the stock?"
I would have to say without banning shorting outright you are correct that it would be mathematically impossible to "undilute or purify" the stock. What I do believe is that when the Brokerage firm or firms come to accept that TMMI is no longer extinguishable, they will be forced to make a reassessment of their position and look to cover. How they do this is a whole other discussion to be had at a future date as for now, TMMI needs to deliver on a saleable product.
p.s. Thanks for taking the initiative to further this discussion as I feel this is of importance. For some readers who have come late into this discussion, I suggest watching these two videos.
On page 6 of this indictment, it is stated that:
"On or about February 1, 2011, the defendant MARTIN SHKRELI took a large short sale position in Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. ( OREX ) in MSMB Capital's brokerage account at Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated ( Merrill Lynch ). Specifically, SHKRELI sold short over 32 million shares of OREX. Contrary to SHKRELI' s representations to Merrill Lynch, MSMB Capital had failed to locate OREX shares to borrow in order to settle MSMB Capital's short sales. As a result, MSMB Capital failed to settle a short position of over 11 million shares of OREX, which Merrill Lynch ultimately closed at a loss of over $7 million."
At this point in time, Orexigen has approximately 47.4 million shares outstanding and yet Shkreli through Merrill Lynch, was able to sell "naked short" over 11 million shares representing over 23% of the issued and outstanding shares of the company. How Merrill Lynch even allowed this size of a short to be executed is beyond me as 10% or more of the issued and outstanding is representative a control position which cannot be sold in this manner (and short no less!).
You can bet that he wasn't the only rogue hedge fund manager that targeted this company at the time and it's most likely what led to the short squeeze. It's this type of scenario that I think was the ultimate cause for TMMI's millennium run to $2.87 per share at the peak of the dotcom bubble in early 2000 and when ownership of the TMMI's technology was questioned late into the run is when the naked shorters doubled down.
Just how many shares were naked shorted is anybody's guess, but if the above is any indication, I don't think it would be a stretch that TMMI's entire capitalization may have been shorted.
This indictment proves my point....
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/9a3wnv/heres-the-full-text-of-martin-shkrelis-criminal-indictment
Counterfeit stock or phantom shares are electronically created to overwhelm a market in order to manipulate the share price to an artificially low price or in some instances destroy a company altogether Most often, these naked short positions were kept open in extreme cases in order to destroy the targeted companies. This was a well-kept secret from the public until the crash came along in 2008. It was only then that the SEC was forced to admit that in fact, this type of activity took place. The loophole that was used to carry out this nefarious activity was named by the SEC "The Madoff Exception" until for obvious reasons, this reference was removed from its website. Until this event took place it was commonplace for targeted companies to have in excess of their authorized capital to be naked short. The crash forced the SEC to reign in this activity with the introduction of REG SHO regulation.
Surely you aware of this type of malicious practice?
"The pool was much darker when there was no reporting published about it. But I don’t know. What’s your answer?"
I have no answer really, for all I know it could be for a very benign reason but I'm suspicious nonetheless. Since you brought up the point I just thought I'd pose the question back at you.
"(I can see your thinking about this is much more thoughtful than the silly counterfeit stock nonsense)"
???
I don't think the counterfeit stock position is silly or nonsense at all. In fact, my whole "Raison D'etre" for being here is to point out what is really going on with TMMI's trading and to see that there is a price paid for this criminal activity.
This is the link that shows trading activity for a stock that is taking place in the dark pool environment but we are not privy to this data until four weeks after the fact, ergo "dark pool".
I guess my point is that with the lack of volume with TMMI, why the need to transact trades in the dark?
It is inconspicuously called OTC Transparency Data. It allows you to see what was trading in the dark pool 4 weeks after the fact. lol
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData
"But I don’t see that Tmmi‘s share price is artificially low, and I’m pretty skeptical about ‘dark pools’. There’s another stock I know (the one that doesn’t have a sound program in any Intel Chip or any other one) that dwells on this sort of thing as an excuse."
As the price sits today it may very well look that way but my argument is that when one looks at the constant pressure put on this stock where it is continually leaned on it prevents the company's ability to finance at a higher price thereby "cellar boxing" the share price and forcing the company into a dilutive financing position.
As for MAXD (the other company), it is nothing more than a toxic coil of a pump and dumped turd. It's unfortunate that these companies often make these claims that discredit companies that are legitimately affected by this practice.
My question to you, with the trading being as thin as it is with TMMI, why the need for the trading in the dark pool environment? I just find it odd that this type of activity even takes place with TMMI.
"Whatever is going on, actual sales or clear prospects of revenue would change everything I think."
I agree and I posted as such a couple of posts ago.
"But in a thinly traded stock isn’t some naked shorting to be expected? I’m not saying that there isn’t abusive short selling going on, I’m just saying that the fact that naked shorting is being reported doesn’t establish manipulation."
Yes, "some" naked shorting is to be expected but when you look at the continuous high percentage of the volume as being "short" taking place, it can only lead me to believe it is a manipulation, especially when you factor in the uneconomic out of market trades that accompany this activity.
FWIW, When you factor in the algorithms, the "flash component" and the dark pool activity, etc, I think this ultimately creates an unlevel playing field for legitimate market participants.
"The odd little painted trades are more significant than the reported short positions. I think."
Not necessarily, I consider the volume of the short sales just as significant as the small painted trades, the "naked shares" sold in the market contribute to the downward pressure on the share price. This is especially true with a thinly traded Market such as TMM's.
It's unfortunate that this activity has been allowed to go on for as long as it has. The manipulation we see happening in real time is undeniable and it will continue. The key to overcoming this nefarious activity is for TMM to deliver on a saleable product and in my opinion embrace the emerging disruptive technologies that are well suited to TMM's product offering.
Let's see how this all unfolds. Interesting times ahead for sure.
Just a follow up to further prove my point...
https://otcshortreport.com/company/TMMI
Somebody is ah gonna get hurt real bad. - Russell Peters
"Stew. Interesting how you nailed the 8k on TV's and a closer TRUEREZ release one day before the official news release.
© 2019 InvestorsHub.com, Inc."
Not sure what you're getting at, my post was in response the latest TRUEREZ player update
"New Free Version 40.0.91.0 is now available (Released April 6, 2019)"
https://www.tmmi.us/products.php
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/reviewedcom/2019/04/03/samsungs-brand-new-8-k-tv-massive-and-its-3-000-off-right-now/3354181002/
"I can't wait to see the shorter's get crushed & have to cover."
It's the unknown factor that will ultimately lead to the crushing. There are new applicable technologies that are well suited to TMMI's product offering that could very well blow the lid of this toxic presence within TMMI's share structure.
Interesting times ahead.
p.s. To prove my point one need only look at today's trading. The printing of eleven hundred shares .071 on the opening creating the illusion of a sell-off on the news and I now see a hundred share print at the bid which is the equivalent of a 2.30 dollar trade. This is manipulation in plain sight.
"Translation of 'new growth capital funding sources" for TMMI means more toxic lender funding to add to the already 1.15 ,million in liabilities plus the dilution of shares."
You really have no idea what's behind this company or its history. Outside of the ill-fated attempt by Mazuma Corp to implement it's toxic lending scheme back in 2007 through an unscrupulous custodian (which was stopped dead in its tracks by a Nevada Court Judge), there has been zero "toxic lender funding".
I have just one simple question to ask of you. With the thousands pink sheet listed companies to choose from, you have picked this one. Why?
Let the enlightenment begin.
p.s. Cute move.