Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
waiting for bashers on the QASP board to complain!
I note it is the autograph of choice today on the QASP (edit)by the "normals" as I call them.
Thanks to you and Aero: finally!
test
Yeah. Just playing so to speak. Aero sent me a PM with how to. I will get it eventually!
Yeah. In greek that is called being an exhypnos colas (smart a**)!
Stand by!!
Oh heck. I will have to go back and figure out how to do this!
OK. I uploaded it to "my images" now I'll see if it is appended to this posting!
I think we should all, with patent holders permission, use that flow chart as our signatures.
Congratulations! My wife wanted a girl but after 4 boys I told her enough was enough. Hope Dean gives you the Harvard tuition and red bmw for her graduation!
maybe I can get one of those gumars like doughboy
Is this the poly amorous stuff I have been hearing about but my wife won't allow me to participate in?
An LOL for both posts!
Any acquisitions made by QASP Intl. can be folding into the shell companies. That is how, IMO, this can be done so quickly as the PRs consistently state will happen. Acquire company X and since you already have company Y shell, you divy up the stock with the holding company maintaining the majority and vola it happens immediately and literally overnigh. Profits get shared, the acquisition owners basically run their entity and later if one wants to you can spin the acquisition off as a separate publicly traded company if you want to after gaining a separate group of investors or interested parties that believe in the separate entities potential.
I am in the process of putting together a similar deal now.
I had dismissed some of postings in the past several months on the various companies associated with Mr. Bradley's name. I just assumed that as with many entrepreneurs he had his hand in several pots so to speak.
Seems that was not exactly the case.
Kudos to those posters who did much better DD than me. Next time I will know to dig a bit deeper and see if I can connect the dots better.
Not until I looked up CSHD.
I certainly hope this doesnt follow that pattern!
Names dont necessarily mean much but holding company is usually chosen so that disparate companies that may not have much to do with one another but are owned by the same person/corporate entity can be included under one roof for taxes, perhaps overseas licensing, etc. (and of course revenue)
I like "holding" for that reason!
thought so. thanks
Yes. Seems to me I recall someone posting a Florida filing that had to do with cars/vehicles earlier this year.
agree on all counts.
Hard to believe you'd acquire something if you don't think it will make money. Conglomerates are just that: conglomerates. I will be interested to see how he hopes to tie this stuff together and of course to know what these acquisitions are and what they sell/manufacture/provide/etc/
exactly.
I don't see how they can close acquisitions without $$.
JACKSONVILLE, FL, Jul 23, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- Quasar Aerospace
Industries, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: QASP)
The Board of Directors of Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc. met in a special
session on July 22, 2010. After consultation with both our securities and
general counsel, the Board unanimously approved authorization for the CEO, Dean
Bradley, to cause to be filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation for
the Company for the purpose of changing the name from Quasar Aerospace
Industries, Inc. to QUASAR INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.
The corporation has created two new divisions in the automotive and marine
industries. We expect to close four new acquisitions in these areas over the
next ten business days. Each of these will be announced individually in the
coming weeks with descriptions of the Company and details of each acquisition.
We have had numerous questions regarding the Annual Meeting, asking if the wives
of shareholders will be admitted to the meeting and the luncheon to follow. The
answer is YES! Others would like the name tags of the attendees to display their
web names on their name tags. This will be totally voluntary, and the
information will need to be in our hands seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
The mailing date by Computershare of the proxy cards and other information will
be on August 27, 2010. A proxy card will be required at the door of the meeting
to gain access as proof of shareholder status.
Excellent! Your parable-esque explanation certainly clarifies why some of my innocuous and rather bland posts were nevertheless deleted by the Lovecraftsian (I am having a William F. Buckley memorial day: inventing words) Powers that Be. I am closer to achieving IHUM Enlightenment than ever before. Thanks.
Sometimes it is about having fun with your investments. Given the following on this board and the hopes of the investors, it would be one for the record books if QASP stock does take off before the shareholders meeting.
That is most assuredly the only way! Irks the hell out of me too that the recent upsurge in bans includes almost none of the extreme bashers who consistently post only lies and regurgitation of issues already addressed but that make the stock look bad.
Do you think? (as another poster on the QASP board says "sarcasm font on")
I am appalled at the vicious and unwarranted tone of that email...not
I am fairly well educated, English is my native language yet I can't figure out the reasoning for deletes and bans.
It is pretty amazing how quickly certain posts are zapped. Heck of a software being used or lots of employees watching all posters or certain posters or something..
Agreed. Despite the nonsense posts that are now legend on IHUB I suppose I stand by my comments on this stock and my DD. QASP has a good shot at making the big time and I the money I invested is well worth the gamble.
I actually tend to agree with Taki in his analysis of the recent prices.
We (and I include myself) get a bit of tunnel vision on QASP and one has to sit back and try to look at it as an outsider would. If you read the QASP board too much you get emotional about how it should react or is reacting rather than reading it "as is."
I was boardmark #35. and thanks!
I came over here to decompress from the QASP board.
CLAK is absolutely correct: guards checking IDs at shareholders meetings is nothing unusual. There are always a few malcontents that want to disrupt meetings, cause problems or have other agendas (I wont elaborate on the last point specific to the QASP board as this would probably be promptly deleted).
No other way to hold a meeting frankly.
Sorry but "stuff and nonsense" Banks do NOT lend to start ups or entrepreneurs very easily if at all in today's world. Or even yesterday's world. One needs private financing or creative financing to get any sort of funding.
I agree. This makes perfect sense. I am VERY familiar with USG contracts of a sensitive nature. I am not privy to what was asked and by whom in this particular case. I can tell you though that sensitive government contracts can be withdrawn if the sort of nonsense alluded to in the PR is taking place.
Pending contracts of a sensitive nature, such as what QASP is working on with mineseeker, would never be awarded to companies about which there is any doubt regarding their ability to deal with sensitive matters and to keep secrets.
The scurrilous allegations bandied about here regarding "Dean is a liar" "Dean is the devil incarnate" (Ok I made that one up: a lot worse has been said by certain relentless bashers) could cause governments and agencies to cease negotiations and look elsewhere for a solution.
QASP's potential for example to get a facilities clearance, that perhaps may be required by the USG for example, would possible be jeapordized.
The PR was absolutely necessary. His business is on the line if he can't deal with governments on sensitive or classified matters. His whole business plan could collapse.
Negotiations with suppliers and foreign Government departments are complex and can be of a confidential and sensitive nature. Our suppliers and Government departments consider this level of enquiry to be unethical and unprofessional. It is damaging to the reputation of Mineseeker and Quasar. Many of the comments on the Quasar investment forums, which are in the public domain, are at best speculative and in many cases inaccurate and misleading. It is apparent that some are designed deliberately to damage the progress and reputation of Quasar and Mineseeker Operations.
This type of action is also harming the relationship of Mineseeker Operations and Quasar.
Bashers and Pumpers et al
Putting aside all our collective desires to make money, I hope that the statement below will be taken to heart by each and every one of us. Some of the posts on here have been shameful.
If nothing else too, this line validates my belief that Mr. Bradley and QASP are doing their best, are sincere and want this to work like most of us do. He is not a crook, scum, etc. etc. (fill in with the vile nonsense that has been perpetrated by some)
News (and I appreciate the reason for it and agree)
JACKSONVILLE, FL, Jul 15, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- Quasar Aerospace
Industries, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: QASP)
The following is a joint statement from the Chairman of Mineseeker Overseas
Operations, LTD, Michael Kendrick, and the Chairman and CEO of Quasar Aerospace
Industries, Inc., Dean Bradley:
Company Communication
Mineseeker Operations is concerned that persons representing themselves as
Quasar shareholders are going to unreasonable lengths to obtain confidential and
business sensitive information and putting this in the public domain. Mineseeker
Operations will not comment on the business relationship between themselves and
Quasar for obvious legal reasons. Requests are also being made of the Mineseeker
Operations suppliers, staff and the Government authorities. Mineseeker has no
way of validating if these enquiries come from Quasar shareholders or, in fact,
competitors purporting to be shareholders.
Negotiations with suppliers and foreign Government departments are complex and
can be of a confidential and sensitive nature. Our suppliers and Government
departments consider this level of enquiry to be unethical and unprofessional.
It is damaging to the reputation of Mineseeker and Quasar. Many of the comments
on the Quasar investment forums, which are in the public domain, are at best
speculative and in many cases inaccurate and misleading. It is apparent that
some are designed deliberately to damage the progress and reputation of Quasar
and Mineseeker Operations.
This type of action is also harming the relationship of Mineseeker Operations
and Quasar. We assume that the comments are coming from persons who have a
vested interest in seeing the project fail. It seems unlikely that anyone with a
financial interest in Quasar would become involved in such a destructive
activity. It would not make sense.
Indeed, enquiries have been made of friends and colleagues seeking to validate
the sudden and tragic death of the CEO of one of our suppliers. This is
distasteful and unethical in the extreme.
Both Quasar and Mineseeker Operations reserve the right to take action against
any individual or organisation that damages the reputation of either company
and/or publishes inaccurate or misleading statements about their business.
Furthermore, Quasar and Mineseeker will act against any person engaged in
tortious interference in either of the company's business affairs.
We will be posting a password protected web page on the Mineseeker web site in a
few days. This will allow people with a legitimate interest in the business to
access information on the company. However, information that is deemed to be
commercially confidential will not be published. We ask all Quasar shareholders
and others to respect the normal practice of proper business communications, and
support what is a potentially lifesaving business endeavor on a global scale.
I think you meant to say that while everybody might know mineseeker is a separate entity many choose to ignore that so they can increase the angst factor among investors on this board.