Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
milchip & crow ...
they had a great BB PR machine back in the day, too. Now, there's only one dedicated "salesman" left.
milchip ... I wish it had turned out differently for many people. Most have accepted their losses and moved on, I imagine.
The flash point for me was the Weil WSJ article. According to wikipedia, "At the flash point, the vapor may cease to burn when the source of ignition is removed."
Weil effectively removed the source of ignition for anyone who paid attention.
Just curious, milchip ...
what's made you change your mind about this company? A singlular event or an accumulation of them?
That's the truth, crow.
Hard to b'lieve it's been 11 years and the attempts at perceived "respectability" and legitimacy are still going on. No more Croatia tests or Capitol demos, though ... and whatever happened to M. Pouligny and all his great world wide introductions (like a couple of major hospitals in GB)? Died aborning?
Same time next year? Or next decade?
pennypot ...
if everything's so great, why is the stock price so range bound? Why isn't it just roaring up up up?
January now?
What a surprise!
welp ...
I think it was well before shriver's time that I'm remembering.
Who's Billie Rubin? I juat can't keep up with all the names ...
It was ~kidd and the other respected poster who were either turned away or no one was there, it was all locked up. I could be wrong, but I think they even had an appointment, prearranged! Arloco would remember, with her steel trap memory.
(Why won't penny reply to my questions?)
hey, penny ...
talk to us about what was revealed about LH in those letters I posted. I asked you to do that earlier but you might have missed it.
Had you ever seen that correspondence before? Are/were you surprised at what Dr. Zovko had to say about Vlado?
Didn't all 3 go visit Tucson? Next to a diner or someplace? And didn't another well liked and respected poster go with one of them, and they were turned away or there was no one there, all locked up? Yup, think I"m right about that.
Since you're now into looking back, penny ... let's look at some more stuph from the old days, back in 2000. Have you ever seen these before? What do you make of them? Who introduced VV to Loch/ChemTech, do you know? Since you go back soooooooooooo far, I"m sure you do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Dr. Nikola Zovko:
I have been interested in Loch Harris, Inc. for over a year, an interest initially created by its highly publicized efforts to use its ELF technology to eliminate landmines. In March of this year I sold shares I bought on the open market in 1999; for a month or two I have been considering reinvesting in the company. That said, however, negative publicity about the company and some unexplained "anomalies" in its SEC filings have made me extremely cautious. Thus this e-mail.
In a September 6, 2000 press release (PR) carried on Business Wire, it is noted that Rodney Boone, President and CEO of Loch Harris, mentioned on a national (USA) radio talk show "plans to return to Croatia for further validation [of ELF] in the next few weeks." To me, the implication is that your Institute is to be involved, as it was earlier this year. This is not the first I have heard of the company's plans to return to Croatia, but it is the first time it has been officially announced in a company PR.
Can you confirm (or deny) that such a return trip is indeed planned for testing in your Institute, and if so, when? What will be the testing parameters? That is, how will the "validation" differ from the earlier tests -- are laboratory or field tests anticipated, or both? Who will witness the tests?
If your Institute is not involved, are you aware of another venue?
Furthermore, it is rumored that Mr. V. Valkovic resigned from Cromac under a cloud of suspicion regarding preferential shares of Loch Harris stock he received in connection with his earlier participation in RBI testing of ELF. Is this rumor true? If so, can you indicate the impact this had on the scientific community in Croatia and on your Institute? I have to believe it was serious. (If you do not want to discuss the fall-out, I will understand, since it may have nothing directly to do with Loch Harris.)
Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule for my questions. I very much look forward to hearing from you.
Cordially,
Dear ____________
I have no any idea about the return of Mr. ELF to Rudjer Boskovic for "further tests". It may be elswhere.
I would also like to add that the "job" done by Mr V. Valkovic in our Institute was his private and it was ilegal to use the name of the Institute for publicity of the demonstration. In short: the Institute Ruder Boskovic does not stand scientifically behind that demonstration. The rumor you maintained is true.
I have a copy of an e-mail in which Mr. Valkovic resigned from CROMAC and appologized to people there.
It is true that "jobs" like that of Mr. Valkovic cause damage to the reputation of the Institute if done in the name of the Institute! This is not the case! There is no slightest indication of some collaboration agreement between RBI and LOCH HARRIS. Therefore, the case Valkovic is, for the beginning, under consideration by the Ethical Commitee of our Scientific Council. I also did the necessary steps outside the Institute.
I understand your worries and thank you for asking those questions. I have to protect the image of our Institute and the ethics of our scientists from singular cases like this one that happened.
Sincerely, Nikola Zovko.
Dear Dr. Zovko:
Thank you very much for your quick and candid reply. I appreciate your clarifying both the Institute's passive role in the demonstrations last winter and "l'affaire Valkovic" -- nasty business, to be sure, but it sounds as if it is being dealt with appropriately. I have no doubt that the Institute's reputation will remain untarnished. As for Mr. Valkovic's ...
another story entirely.
I wish you and your colleagues continued success.
Cordially,
Dear Dr. Zovko:
I apologize for imposing on you again, but I have just reread the following PR (dated June 24, 1999), cut and pasted here in its original form, complete with typos. I had read it last year but didn't remember it in detail. In light of subsequent revelations about Mr. V. Valkovic, I would appreciate it very much if you would comment on it, to the extent you feel you can. My specific questions follow.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Loch's Physicist Introduces ELF Landmine Technology to International Nuclear Conference in Greece
AUSTIN - Renowned physicist Dr. Henry Blair introduced the new ELF landmine detector technology to the international nuclear community yesterday morning on the Greek island of Crete, according to R.B. Baker, chairman of Loch Harris, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: LOCH). Today, Blair presented his formal paper, "A Man Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Based Landmine Detection and Location System," to the 6th International Conference on Applications of Nuclear Techniques and fielded questions afterward. More than 100 scientists have registered for the conference, which is under the auspices of The Office Of National Drug Control Policy -- The White House, NCSR Demokritos, and Western Kentucky University. Rodney Boone, CEO of both Loch Harris and ChemTech, accompanied Blair to the conference, along with Loch's Chief Financial Officer Mark Baker, who reported on Blair's introductory speech in an international conference call yesterday afternoon. Blair, who developed the ELF for Chemical Detection Technology, Inc. (ChemTech), subsidiary of Austin-based Loch Harris, was invited to the already closed conference program at the insistence of Dr. Vlado Valkovic, chairman of Croatia's Ruder Boscovic Institute. Valkovic executed an agreement last month between Croatia and ChemTech to collaborate on development of the ELF through the live field test phase, scheduled in Croatia in January. Chairman Valkovic introduced Blair to the group, saying, "We're excited to be working with Loch's ChemTech in the laboratory and field testing of the ELF system."
Valkovic is betting heavily on the ELF to help locate the estimated 1.2 million landmines left over from the Croatian civil war. Source: PRNewswire, June 24, 1999
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In your earlier email, you said it was illegal for Mr. Valkovic to have used the name of the Rudjer Boskovic Institute for publicity of the ELF demonstration last winter. As you see, at the end of this PR it states that Blair "was invited to the already closed conference program at the insistence of Dr. Vlado Valkovic, chairman of Croatia's Ruder Boscovic Institute. Chairman Valkovic introduced Blair to the group, saying, 'We're excited to be working with Loch's ChemTech in the laboratory and field testing of the ELF system.' Valkovic is betting heavily on the ELF to help locate the estimated 1.2 million landmines left over from the Croatian civil war."
Specifically, I would like first to know if Mr. Valkovik was at that time Chariman of the Institute. If so, this sounds as if he was acting in an official Institute capacity, not privately, when he insisted that Blair be included in "the already closed conference." A reasonable inference could be drawn that his use of RBI as a venue for ELF demonstrations in February was also within his official capacity as Chairman of the Institute.
Secondly, I find the wording in the next sentence to be very loose, vague and ambiguous: It suggests that Mr. Valkovik had the authority to speak for the Croatian Government, much as (for instance) Madeline Albright might speak for the US Government. Is this an accurate representation of the scope of his authority at that time?
Please understand that I am not asking you to reveal anything that is inappropriate for you to disclose regarding "the case Valkovic" (as you charaterized it in your last email). While I cannot deny my interest in what legal action, if any, is being taken against Mr. Valkovik in Croatia, my primary interest is in the accuracy of this June '99 PR.
As you know, a press release is drafted by a Company spokesperson, usually someone hired just for the purpose of communicating with the press. It generally is reviewed by the Company's legal counsel before it is released.
While press releases often put the best "spin" on facts, especially uncomfortable facts (and almost always include disclaimers) they are generally believed to reflect truth. Current and potential investors in a company's stock depend on them for reliable information regarding that company's progress in meeting its goals. If a PR distorts or misrepresents the truth, many otherwise uninformed current and potential investors are misled and can suffer financial losses on their investments.
If this PR is misleading, intentionally or otherwise -- as others unrelated to RBI, Croatia and/or ELF have been -- I believe it is appropriate to bring that fact to the attention of the FBI who is already interested in certain other activities of Loch Harris.
To clarify who I am (and am not): I was, as I indicated in my first email to you, an investor in Loch Harris last winter and spring. I sold my relatively small number of shares in March. I am a private US citizen neither officially nor unofficially connected with a newspaper or other periodical, nor with Loch Harris, nor with any investigative body in the US or elsewhere. However, the FBI has contacted me regarding another aspect of Loch Harris business practices that I uncovered in my continued research into the company, an aspect that has absolutely nothing to do with tests or demonstrations in Croatia or with the Rudjar Boskovic Institute.
And so a final question: Do I have your permission to convey to the FBI the information you provided in your first email to me and your response to the questions I have raised here?
This is indeed serious business and I thank you again for taking the time to address my concerns. I look forward to your reply.
Cordially,
Dear _________________
It seems that this will be a "continuing story", true?
Unfortunately, the info's we exchanged represent only the top of an eisberg!
Valkovic has been working in Huston, Texas, then shortly at RBI, then he left for IAEA (Internat. At. En. Agency). After 8 (or 7?) years spent there he came back to RBI.
Now he has a postgraduate student and a technician attached to him. Officially he is now even not the had of a laboratory, although he once had one before he left the Institute.
Certainly, he is not a chairman at RBI of any kind.
Finally, whatever I wrote to you including this message of today, is thruth. So, you are allowed to use those informations. Sincerely, Nikola Zovko
milchip ... if that's all it would take
wouldn't you think robert stewart would buy one just to jump start things?
Or at least he could invest $199.00!
Isn't that known as putting your money where your mouth is?
What kind of "material news" would it take, milchip?
When is the next shareholder's meeting? And where?
Where are the current cdex headquarter offices?
Has anyone talked to Ann Jacklin of Charing Cross recently?
How many cuvettes have been sold recently?
aaaah, croww ...
So glad you reminded stewy that his good friend elrheo helped with the theft. He might have forgotten.
And stewy says we slither with snakes!
"He did not mention that CAPN with his OPEN LETTERS to the LOCH BOD really was the factor that finally gave MP the opening into engineering the Derivitive suit, swiping it away from STORMY
with the help of RIO. MP DID NOT WANT STORMY TO DO IT FOR SURE!!"
Stormy was one angry cat.
Elrheo told me he just couldn't unnerstan why stormy was so upset with him -- all he (elrheo) wanted was his investment back.
What a lotta words you use to say yes, Stewy!
Remember my question, Stewy? All (that's ALL, A-L-L) it was was whether or not you wrote the first dated e-mail and were the recipient of the second. I even made it simple for you, pointing out all you needed to do was say yes or no. You really didn't need to write a term paper.
In any case, thank you for confirming you were both sender and receiver.
I guess you won't mind if everyone calls you Robert from now on. Though "Stewy" kind of adds a nice touch. Stew away, Stewy!
I knew you'd bring up the fact that basildon evidently sent your e-mail and his reply to you to someone else. That seems to bother you. Whyzzat? You think it violates "trust"? Gosh ... I didn't see any request for confidentiality in yours. Just a sort of vague hint that that particular e-mail was for him only. Did you ask him to sign a confidentiality agreement? Did he sign one and then violate it? When did he distribute the two e-mails? When did I first read them? Was it before or after you and Mari bombed out?
In your post to crowe, you mention rottenapple. What a surprise to see you bring his name up, without any prompting even! It's kinda too bad he's lost interest in the vagaries of this company, isn't it. Actually, you probably are glad he has. I don't think he was very happy with you ... but you already know that, right?
See, it's like this (in case you didn't already know). Rotten and I became almost as good friends as basildon and I. I know, I know, hard to believe given how we were at each other's throats for so long, but truth is often stranger than fiction.
Anyways (tm nasfanium), maybe we can chat again someday, Stewy. You can bring elrheo along and I'll bring stormy. We could really have some fun!
Have a good day, Robert. Try not to walk through any quicksand on your way to the computer.
Hi, pennypot!
I notice you haven't had a chance to asnwer my yes or no questions yet. I'll look for it tomorrow.
But in the meantime, what was this all about?
"Did you tell this board that your communication with the three above, plus xenophon was email and boards? Or would you like to amend that post?
So sad for you dear. Did not have to be this way."
Is it your idea of a scary threat? An ominous hint of dire things that are going to happen to me?
Ya gno wot? Threats aren't nice things. Making threats can get one in real trouble. However, it sounds like a tomscheboy tonnabricks scary threat from the old days, so I prolly don't need to worry. Unless of course you, like tommy, are running with the wrong kind of peeps, the kind who wind up in Club Fed.
(Is tommy coaching you these days? Or even better: writing some of your posts for you? Go ahead, you can tell us. No need for you to shoulder the responsibility all by yourveryownself.)
But I digress (tm chimp). To answer the question implicit in your scary threat: The only person I've met in person who ever posted on any of the loch/cdex boards, whether this board or any other board ... besides elrheo of course ... was ... ready for it? RR. I met him in DC, of all unlikely places. An interesting man. He'd have chewed you up and spit you out before you knew what hit you.
I always wanted to meet JohnnyReengo and his Momma but that just wasn't to be. One of them died, but I can't remember which one. I also wish I'd met blkhoc but that also wasn't to be, for the same reason.
Here you go, pennystreetperson.
Since there are sooooooooooo many questions you don't seem to want to touch with a ten foot pole, maybe because they're too complicated for you, here are two very simple ones requiring just a one word answer.
Question #1: Did you write and send the following e-mail?
Question #2: Were you the addressee of the reply to it?
Yes or no?
> > From: ROBERT STEWART [mailto: STEWY5@COX.NET]
> > To: BasildonBond@excite.com
> > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:56:15 -0500
> > Subject: Loch
> >
> > We have never met, but I hope you will let me bend
> your ear a moment. I am
> > Robert Stewart, Mari and I are working as hard as we
> can through our
> > attorney's to get us up and flying. We are not giving
> the BBoys but a few
> > more days to get their act together before we go to
> discovery.
> > At that time, we may truly need some help. I would
> very much like to have
> > your thoughts on a conference call with our
> attorneys.
> > There is no need to go to discovery if the BBoys would
> just do the right
> > thing. They have our paper work to sign, they just
> need to sign it. This
> > email is for you only, I do speak to others and Mari
> and I will be
> bringing
> > an update this week to the board, and maybe a signed
> paper.
> > I hope to hear back from you soon,
> > Thanks,
> > Robert
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:23:01 -0400
> From: Barry Muncaster <basildonbond@excite.com> [ Add to Address Book
> | Block Address ]
> To: <STEWY5@COX.NET>
> Subject: RE: Loch
>
> Robert,
> I'm surprised you contacted me. You know that I'm considered to be a
basher
> by the so-called longs. Not that that worries me unduly, because my
> intentions are and have always been to tell the truth and to correct
> the inaccuracies and grossly misleading statements posted by some of
> the so-called longs.
>
> I'm not sure what your motive is in contacting me, so perhaps you
> would
care
> to expand on that further. I have no problem in joining any conference
call
> with any lawyers, but I need to know what is expected of me going in.
>
> Regards,
> Barry J Muncaster
> a.k.a DDMan
Oh dear.
An exercise in futility, then?
Pls to define demurrer for pennypot's and my edification? Much grass.
How about this ... ring any bells?
"I would very much like to have your thoughts on a conference call with our attorneys."
How many attorneys was that, exactly? Add 'em up and tell me. You can use your special kind of math if you'd like to arrive at a figure.
Does this ring any distant bells in your head, penny?
Perhaps from as far back as August 6, 2002?
"Mari and I will be bringing an update this week to the board, and maybe a signed paper."
no idea, penny doll ... why?
In red, pennypot:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sea_Urchin:
You know Mari girl. No I don't. Never met her. Only have read about her. Ask another question. You and her squared off over many post. Pull up one, just ONE post that Mari and I "squared off over." I think you've got mari confused with sassy.
She was picked by a law firm out of New York to represent Loch Shareholders. And that law firm was ... (name please)? She was a pper in Cdex. She open her checkbook on several occasions. I'm sure she did! Which ones would you like to tell us about? I have no idea if she ever made a penny. You don't? Again, how easily you lie, foole. I liked her, and thought she was a fair minded person. Which shows what a great judge of character you are. She was abused by this board,she was? and some dumbskulls that played for themselves and not the shareholders. Who would they be? She always played for the shareholders. Sure thing. If you say so.
Post anything you like Barb. One more chance for you to post your name, penny, before I do. Why are you so reluctant to do that?
Speaking of telling the truth, nice job of dodging the Stock distributor, sactamundo, and theciscokidd poster. Not ducking it at all, pennypot. Unlike you, I know who all three "monikers" belong to, and so does almost anyone else you might ask. On the other hand, given how easy it seems to be for you to lie, you might also be able to identify the monikers' actual owners and are just trying to make peeps think they belong to one person, even though you know otherwise. Are you able to follow that? I know it's pretty complicated and may be too taxing for you.
I say again Barb, did you like all three men? I still very much do like ~kidd, sacta and stk. Always have. NOthing new there. They're light years ahead of you in brain power for starters. You hang with snakes and lie about people you know not. REAL-ly? Wanna prove that? You know who the three monikers are above, sure do you knew it when he was posting. There ya go, saying all 3 belong to one person ... again! You're like a broken record, as I've said. Your character or should we just be truthful, your lack of character, allows you to be such a hypocrite. Many things I am, pennydear -- a hypocrite is not one of them.
Mari has been out of the Loch and Cdex picture for years. Yup, you're prolly right. Get off her back I'm not on her back. I'm on YOUR back. You're who wrote the e-mail, not mari. and look in the mirror and decide if you can be honest about anything. You wouldn't recognize honesty if it had flashing red lights and a siren announcing its presence. How embarrassed were you with the math test I gave you. I don't do math like yours, and can use defined words MUCH better than you can, penny. Maybe if I used YOUR vocabulary I'd be able to figure out how the wunnerful little drug detector can measure volume. And no, what I posted regarding money and capital and income and revenue and assets and the like didn't embarrass me at all, though your response should have embarrassed you. Do you want to add up all the monikers your gang of hypocrites Prolly shouldn't overwork your fav word, pennypoo. post>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, I did not think so. You're right. What would that illustrate? But you can go ahead and add them up if that would make you feel good.
Keeping it real` akshally, you're just diggin' that hole wider and deeper for yourself. And you know that.
~BUZZOUT~ why DON'T you buzz off, penny? Or won't you have an income if you don't keep trying?
Have fun tonight, pennygirl (you SAID you were a girl), and be sure an remember to give your full name right on this very board. Before you have breakfast would be good. It'll give you a good feeling to start the day fresh with everything out on the table for all to see. Don't you think?
pennypot ... I meant:
Would you like me to post your e-mail to him? And his reply to it?
Since you're apparently bizzy now, pennypot, I'l give you till tomorrow to reply to the questions I've asked you -- all of them in my last couple of posts, including the edit in this one -- and if nada by then, I'll put both of them up in their entirety.
Zat OkeeDoakee bye U[d]?
yawwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn
gosh, pennypotter ...
you seem to be getting it from all quarters these days.
think maybe you've become useless (again) to the "in" crowd at cdlochex? Sure looks that way.
~kidd!
I was gonna ask penny if HE knew about arloco's significant family irritations, too -- I mean he knows so MUCH about everyone I'm sure he does. That was sooooooooooo funny, little did we know how "right to the source" her complaints were going! I was also going to ask penny if he knew anything about plagues of moths but that was too creepy even to think about again.
If he keeps posting, maybe I'll ask him if he remembers anything about interest in him from across the pond ... but that was soooooooooooo long ago and he was soooooooooooo green he prolly didn't even know about it. I might give him a hint or two later. Maybe.
I miss
~poet too,
his
way with
words
(remember his dis-bard rhyme? chimp was bowled over!)
and chimp -- what a super guy -- the first one I "met" way back when
and 4x4! Remember his post about box schemes? He nailed it in one. We were psychic twins -- same birthday -- he said Mom always liked him best.
no particular comment on pppi ... kinda scattershot I always thought, I never quite/quit/quote/quorum knew what to believe.
And YOU! I'm still mad you didn't let a couple of us estate sit in your absence ... we'd have taken really really good care of everything.
Fantastic about the miners, huh ... so nice to have some good news for a change. Bravo Chile!
Who's Stu?
r------------ is a really good guy. I've liked him ever since we joked about puff.
... any more than the "settlement" jmarcine got was disclosed.
You're really not too smart, are you, pennypot?
Also ... what were the dates ~kidd and crowe first posted and how do those dates compare to the date you under your current alias first posted?
If you're going to compare their posts with yours, don't you think you should note their starting dates or compare posts using the date YOU reappeared as pennypot as the starting date for tabulating their posts?
Alternatively you could add in all your other aliases and compare things that way.
Lots of zaps tonight ... what's the deal? Somebody overstepping some boundaries or other?
Ackshally, they were last night.
Weird.
"If Dr. Poteet had gone back to the University during the Loch Haris [sic] days, there would have never been a CDEX-INC."
Akshally, you need to be more specific, pennypot. Talk to us poor ignorami about when and how Dr. Poteet "met" the then not so world renowned "Dr." Henry Blair. He was a far better moneymaker than a university post would ever be. Because without the shy, retiring garage tinkerer, "Dr." Henry Blair, there would have been no elf or vammp. Palace security and incredible edible cotton seeds and hi tech tulis and stuph like that just weren't making things HAPPEN, and what was needed was for things to HAPPEN.
An amazing stroke of good fortune for them to meet, wasn't it, pennypot. And how easy was it later to throw the good "Dr." Henry Blair under the bus, let him take the fall? Very easy I'd say (and just did).
diddy!!!!
osscout is the newest board member? How did I miss THAT?! Oh wait, I know ... by not paying attention.
2funny !
Whatever you say, pennypot.
Keep right on demonstrating your extreme intelligence.
8 e-mails you say? Oh wow, are you ever popular.
sea_urchin:
Why oh why do you want to post you live in ns? Why? Did I post that I lived in NS? To quote yourself: try reading what's written instead of what you think is being said.
Did ya forget our goof friend nick? Nevah. He and his electric yellow shirt will live in my memory forever, along with a few other things. BTW, pls to speak for yourself on the question of "friends."
As for the rest of your post: give it up, Robbie, about filed docs noting ooc payments or off-book settlements of any kind, to ~kidd or ... oh for starters, let's add jmarcine to the list, two too 2 twa deux.
Ciao, chico.
oh ~kidd ...
"the staged legal action"
You mean (please say it can't be so) that whole APA affair was staged? That it was preplanned? a ruse? rigged? a ... SCAM????
The same as the moon-powered windmills? same as the elf (including the masterfully planned and executed "test" at the RBI) and elf's first cousin the vaamp? What about the incredible edible cotton seeds? Or the more curent drug tester (in all its iterations)?
Who would ever conceive of doing such things ????????????????????
And w h y o w h y ??????????????????????
It's enough to make a body sick. Or in some cases, very very broke.
PENNYPOT ...
I hope Barb drives over, I really do. It's a long drive from NS, pennypot. That aside, I might try to make it if you'll gift me the required one (1) share that jenn correctly noted was required, despite YOUR post saying NON-shareholders could attend. I think any poster on this board who will bring their last 30 to 50 post, copied, and personally signed and dated, should come on down. Tell you wot, pennypot. YOU copy all the posts I made as seaurchin and before and present them to me at the door. I'll sign them then and there and present you with my driver's license and passport so you can verify the signature. Why should I go to all the trouble of copying them when you have plenty of time and can scan them easily. (They just don't have scanners in NS, donchagno. Can be a real prollem.) I will promise, if they come with signed post from this board, each post will be read while they stand at the head table. Recognition is a good thing for all the honest and factual truths they have posted. That's okay, pennypot. You don't have to do that (unless you want to). Recognition isn't one of my driving needs. There will be pictures taken with all their signed post. What a nice touch! Keep going ... maybe you can convince me after all.After all, rio only bought me lunch (though it was a very good lunch). What a great plan. Make a reservation, ok.
How long before paige or lori or barb or cisco or crow or demmo, post that 8K or Sb-2 or sec filing with all that sum of money ole cisco took from the b-boys? It was so top secret, ...
Now you're catching on, pennypot. A little slow on unnerstanding, aren't you. No need to answer, you can plead the 5th. But I guess you've prolly never won an ooc settlement, right? And that's why you don't unnerstand how they work? Anyways (tm nasfanium) keep sweetenin' da pot pennypot and let's see what your next offer is.
Interesting post by paige, don't you think, pennypot?She's truthful, isn't she -- or would you even recognize truth if it hit you in the face?
but jenn ...
pennypincher or whatever his alias is posted right here on this very board that nonshareholders could go to the shareholders metg without buying (or being gifted) shares.
Why would he post that if it weren't true?
It's just that I'd hate to appear and be turned away at the door. Particularly when I'd be providing the mojitos.