5000 comedians out of work and you think you're funny?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bid was .0525 at close today for 50k shares. On a friday yet! double from last week.
Ok.you keep us posted when then happens.
HMPQ already has a product on the market. How high do you think the share price will get when the energy drink is released, and people find out it's a superior tasting beverage to Canns distributed Rocky Mountain Mouthwash?
LOL
well that's one more goofy lie. Show us a little schmaltz, where's the beef, any proof? ho-hum..just when you think things can't get more ridiculous! The float hasn't changed, you can call the transfer agent, like I have. 11 million.
You haven't proven any of your wild assertions. Cann's idea of chocolate looks like a poor product nobody would buy imo. HMPQ's chocolate bar is far more attractive, and superior to those little bon bons, or whatever you call them that CANN can't get anyone to produce for them.
No crossbones. No skull. No grey market. No halt. If you have to resort to fabrications to mislead shareholders, then you're only speaking to your own cred.
HMPQ hasn't diluted any shares , nor sold them to anyone else but since you have no evidence to back up your false assertions, we won't see any. The float remains the same at 11 million.
oh geez, we're on the buzz cloud. Now more people will discover this, and learn the big happening with HMPQ!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/tcloud2.aspx
Any other goofy lies that you can't prove? Can you tell us what color socks he wore yesterday?
Jealousy is a 3 headed pig. One doesn't lend themselves any credability on anything, when intentionally try to mislead shareholders.
Ok, if you say so. So now you agree that HMPQ will be releasing the chocolate bar. Maybe you should call the company and tell them what you've discovered! LOL..they'll probably laugh in your face, or spit out their coffee!
HempAmericana does their own research on their own products. Don't flatter Cann too much, they have nothing but hot air. I refer you again, to the company's first PR if you wish to know where the research is conducted, and whom backs this company. Your imagination is fascinating though. Must be why Cann's lawyer told them he wouldn't touch this without a huge retainer. They may have to pay it anyways to defend themselves in court, if extortion, and tort charges are filed. We'll know that very soon. ha!
Board marks moved from 16 to 28. You couldn't ask for better publicity. Thanks Cann, we want the whole world to know about HempAmericana!
Rolling Thunder Hemp Papers are in numerous stores. And soon they look to be releasing Mama Coca Hemp Energy beverage, and HempAmericana chocolate bars!
Cann has no ability to prove anything they're "saying"-LOL-
You haven't proven anything on their behalf either, except that they're worried about losing huge market share on their distributed hemp energy drink, and that they posted pictures of their chocolate kisses on FB, even though they didn't ask FB users to sign NDAs.
Gee you better tell them that, before they release the product. It sure looks like it will be an attractive product. I think the energy drink will be released soon, and before the chocolate bar.
Awesome. Glad you saw the light. How soon do you think the chocolate bar will be on the market?
I refer you to HMPQ's first PR if you want to know where much of the research is done, and whom is financially backing the company. That's the one I found in the Tulsa newspaper in the beginning of the year. Thanks for helping me put out all this great info for new investors looking for a great stock!
Gotcha. You keep thinking that. People like to know how brilliant your deductive reasoning skills are.
Your story line has been debunked so many times, it's rather pathetic. Maybe CANN should market a hemp drink with a nipple attached to it, seeing that all they can do is whine over all the business they are losing anyways.
What promo is that? If HMPQ has a promo let me know. We're actually promoting them here on this message board, because a lot of people are looking for a company like this. And the increase in messages attract more attention to the company. The PRs speak for themselves. HMPQ plans to release a Hemp chocolate bar, and a new Hemp energy drink. If you find any evidence of dilution let me know, because their has been none since this company started. HMPQ is more interested in attaining a higher share price.
Very cool. Thanks, now all the new and future shareholders can friend the CEO. Normal people don't judge others by their looks, but there is nothing wrong with his appearance anyways. But thanks for your childish post, I'll send him a friend request soon.
The fraud is that which you claim never existed, like much of what you say. But 4000% gains seems reasonable since the the float hasn't changed.
It won't happen. I'm rooting for HMPQ's new energy drink and chocolate bar to take a large market share in the industry, when consumers find out that HempAmericana makes a superior product.
In fact if you notice, the board marks have been increasing, and now more investors are finding out about HMPQ, and the new Hemp energy drink they plan to release, that will blow away the competition, and grab a nice share of the market (away from Cann)
You can think what you wish, but that doesn't change the truth. Obviously the market doesn't agree with you, nor would most independant investors following the weak argument you presented on Cann's behalf.
I'm sure you read that CANN claims they only want an apology- and they still claim that HMPQ doesn't plan to market these products. Maybe HMPQ can say "We're sorry you're such a scammy company that is worried that our Energy drink will take away a substantial market share from your awful tasting drink" Or they can apologize to Cann "We're sorry that your butt hurts so much. Please try our new relaxant butt hurt cream, because we're really going to put the screws to you" How's that? Should we advise HMPQ to make one of these apologies?
HMPQ is pretty well self financed , and has deep pockets. I refer you to their first PR, about whom is backing this company. He has more money than all the penny ante hemp companies combined. I would think that soon Cann will lose their Rocky Mountain distributorship, because no reputable company wants to associated with a group of proven criminals. Cann knows they stand to lose big market share in the Hemp Energy Drink market, and they sound real desperate to discredit HMPQ without anything to back up their libelous claims.
Well his suggestion is ignorant. Why would HMPQ apologize for something they didn't do? That's the same as an admission of guilt. It's almost as bad as signing an NDA with a serial liar. And who cares what this anonymous poster says? He's in cahoots with Cann anyways, that's not hard to deduce.
HempAmericana must have their competition extremely worried. There won't be an apology, don't hold your breath. However, I would expect HMPQ to demand an apology, or better yet pursue civil, and criminal charges.
So who cares who he is. He's could be the King of Prussia, but he's still an anonymous penny stock hustler as far as message boards, and Twitter are concerned. Unless you are suggesting that he is behind this extortion Cann America, the private company, wishes it could pull off.
I'm sure HMPQ is just shaking in their boots over some anonymous penny stock player on Twitter-LOL..
Even though the chocolate products are extremely dissimilar, the fact remains that HMPQ never knew about Canns intention to show the world their chocolate kiss-like product on Facebook (meaning an NDA on this product cannot exist) nor was HMPQ previously aware of the existance of this concept, since it was never brought up in the meeting Cann solicited.
I can predict what will happen, since Cann is run by a fool that thinks he knows more than everyone else by trying to make a case, based on postings on a message board over a dissimilar product that they somehow claim HMPQ has no intention to distribute-and claiming that these PRs are an inducement to buy stock only, when there hasn't been any diluted or restricted stock sold into the market, from what we see. I predict more banter back and forth, and Cann will never get an apology over a lie, just to lay off. It would be foolish to accede to any demands from an extortionist that wishes to use blackmail to entrap a company in a lie.
I've never invested in an OTC company that I didn't research, and I can offer my opinion to any one of them freely with no consideration for how Cann Americana feels about it. And I won't charge Cann for my advice to them either.
I know it costs 100,000/year or so, more in expenses to file QB, because another company I owned dropped their QB status because it wasn't worth the extra expense at that point in time in the company's life, when there were better uses on their budget.
HMPQ was never delisted, they chose to go this route, and be straight pink. So you can put that lie to bed as well. The first thing any shareholder would ask a company is why they changed their status, that's what investor relations is for. Assuming that they would have to make a PR, especially as a company not required to file this, shows how little you understand some of the basic security laws on the OTC market.
I hope if you do some more fishing you catch something more than old tin cans, and used tires. It looks like Cann has a world of butt hurt coming their way, and their lawyer is warning them to lay off before it's too late.
I'm an advisor to anybody I talk with. I'm an advisor for Cann America also. I advised them they could be looking at racketeering charges, and sued for slander if they continue with their charade. You want to make a point that a share holder can't make any recommendations to a company? Maybe we could halt Microsoft too.
There is not. The SEC doesn't work that way. Anybody can allege anything, you have to have a case, and merit, which there is neither. Cann can't even afford a lawyer which they're going to need if they keep up the slander.
More doublespeak..the claims are baseless and without merit. That's why Cann's lawyer won't sue without a huge retainer, because he knows the company can't afford it, and has no case. I can deduce some things myself from the FB rants, and the irrational line of reasoning you use in these assumptions.
I remember this post because the company had told this to investors this was in their plans since March on their website. And I advised them, after reading the article in the Tulsa paper from January and contacting this brand new company myself directly, that it's smart to come out with food products first, because of the huge growing market for Hemp food products, and that it will enhance company revenues in it's early stages! Whether they listened to me, or decided themselves doesn't matter, but HempAmericana decided to go for food long before Cann ever solicited them. So Cann can call it what they want, we call it building a company!
I know the egg came before the chicken!
Don't listen to these NY Cann sheisters, HMPQ is a smart, honest, and a great company, and will have many new products in the future.
Credit for what? LOL..there's nothing to give credit for...Should HMPQ give credit to Hershey, Cadbury, and Nestles too, as well as all the companies that make chocolate hemp edibles? If Cann could prove it, rather than state an opinion, don't you think they would have filed a lawsuit? I think they hope they can make someone afraid, and buy up the stock, but it looks like HMPQ has some heavy hitters backing them up. Thanks for telling me about Schlomo! So does Cann stand by their claim that HMPQ has no intention to market their new products? Huh?
HMPQ never entered in any talks with Cann about chocolate. Cann set up the meeting, and solicited HMPQ to discuss distributing the Hemp rolling papers on the market. Which leads one to believe that Cann's claim that HMPQ will never have a drink or chocolate product on the market, and is only creating PRs from suggestions of Cann's chocolate prototype, available on Facebook for billions to see, as some NDA infringement is frivilous, without any company stock being sold on the market, and libelous. Refer to RICO statutes, for more reference. Besides Cann never discussed chocolate with them, and your inferences are mere baseless assumptions, and your timeline is skewed if there was a scintilla of merit to this allegation, that is not even a civil matter. Anyone can complain to the SEC about anything, but even if the SEC did listen (which they probably won't) there is still a matter of due process, and then there can be civil, and criminal charges leveled against Cann, which is a private company as such, would not be able to raise the money to pay of any verdict against them that would take years, and at considerable legal expense. So besides having no merit-these phony, unproven, and disproven allegations Cann rants about on Facebook, will not go anywhere except in our banter here.
That's a nice piece of fiction , since this page never existed. You could print that here, except it doesn't exist. LOL Any more bullshit you want to throw out? I do discuss your phony allegations , it's all part of my DD.
The screen shot is as mythical as your chocolate. So what's your angle, what's your goal here?