Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
see also: Tasers...
they would have SAVED money by selling at a nickel rather than a penny...regardless of how much they paid...the fact that they got ripped off doesn't justify holding on.
Right...you got duped...so sell, take the tax loss (too late now) and move on. Stop believing/blaming the Windsor Star who was right all along and gave you warning that it was a scam...anyone who listened to them and sold when the first piece ran saved a lot of money
SLJB should have issued a press release annoucning the OSC allegations.
Hockmir, you stay upbeat too...although I'd have a hard time if I'd been defending this piece of crap and questioning the motives of anyone who pointed out what a fraud it is.
More dishonesty and lack of candor from Sulja:
You would think that, given all the PR's about non-material events (like the WS articles), they would get around to releasing a PR to announce an OSC investigation.
Is ANYONE else here angry that they didn't issue a PR to announce the OSC investigation? They are STILL not being forthcoming.
haha...airys has trule proven what a moron he is. :) if he hadn't before...
"Big attorneys don't take cases that are bogus."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...Someone forgot to tell that to O.J. Simpson's Dream Team...Lawyers go wherever the money is. And given that Petar etc. received well over 5 million dollars from ripping people off, they will have plenty of money to pay up.
Airys, you're an idiot. The idea that somehow the fact that they're gonna hire big shot lawyers proves this isn't a fraud is a load of crap. Jeff Skilling's hot-shot defense team says hi.
they are gone...this thing was such a fraud it's not even funny...read the OSC thing on it that came out the 27th...and dump your shares while you still can.
Only 1 hour and 15 minutes left to dump this and take your tax loss for 06.
I would be very happy if people sell. It's what they should do. It's the smart thing to do.
but when you're spouting off about information that you have and then declining to show evidence of it...you can say whatever you want but the fact is people are buying and selling based on what you say, and that is, I think, your intent.
People,
Airys is most likely lying/manipulating the share-price. Take what he says with a grain of salt. BY NO MEANS should you even CONSIDER buying or selling based on what he says.
hahaha...that would matter if this wasn't a fraud...can't believe you are still believing their crap.
so you're going to ask the people who lied to you and scammed you to put themselves in your position and stop lying and scamming you? Sounds like a fool-proof plan to me!
i care because i find it hilarious watching bozos endlessly analyzing this little penny-stock fraud.
What a joke...people here are still trying to analyze this company and make sense of it, and try to figure out the lies. It's a scam being run by liars, and you aren't part of it, so you don't know what the reality is. Just give up and take your tax loss.
uWink coming to Pakistan?!?!
I doubt that it is, but I did find it funny that the Reuters article was picked up by a Pakistani newspaper...now if we can just sell a franchise in Afghanistan...I hear Bin Laden's looking for something to do?:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\12\25\story_25-12-2006_pg6_6
Ah yes...the good old UPOD...certainly beats OPUD
Some of the sites that picked up the new Reuters article about uWink so far:
Red Herring, Washington Post, Scientific American...
that could be picked up by other newspapers potentially because it's Reuters.
Hey...ah...HIGH FIVE!! Veh-y nice:
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-12-22T134954Z_01_NCE337...
Not to be rude, but you are basing that on anything?
Yeah, most definitely.
<<<It could only be done within the Market itself, which is why we should be going after the criminals that did this, instead of whining constantly about SLJB.
Sure Petar & Steve made a few mistakes, but how many of you can say that you have NEVER made a mistake or two in your life?<<<
ahhaahahahah...hahahahaha....ahahahahaha...::gasping for breath:: A few mistakes? Are you being facetious there? This whole company is a scam and you're saying that's a few mistakes?
All of this would be important, except that this a scam being run by fraudsters. Shareholders will never see a dime of that money. Sell now.
Hey,
FWIW:
I found a couple of former uWink employees on myspace and, just for giggles, messaged them and asked what working for uWink was like. One wrote back (so far) and said that it was a really great place to work...he described Nolan as down-to-earth, innovative, and very hard-working.
Zac
Yeah, most definitely...what's really good to see is that uWink really does seem to believe that they've achieved proof of concept here. This combined with the generally non-promotional style of the management is, to me, very encouraging. I mean, they're obviously very excited about what they're doing but if you read their PR's, they could VERY easily be upping the amount of fluff...they're not making this into a stock promotion, which is a good sign.
I think it's just a matter of time.
I found it on google blogsearch. This is also VERY interesting from the same post, which is seeking engineers for employment:
"You’ll be key to designing and completing the next version of our website. We’re redesigning it from the ground up with RSS feeds for news, user accounts, mailing lists, and we need a skilled PHP coder to help make this a reality."
I totally agree....for a high-tech restaurant concept, uWink's website is not good enough...this is super cool.
I just read that and emailed it to buyvaluenow...hehe...it really seems like they are extremely bullish on it and, if they're actively hiring engineers, not too tight with cash for the moment.
Uwink's engineering blog:
I apologize if this has already been posted:
http://devblog.uwink.com/?p=11
PATHETIC that people are long this stock.
Being overzealous is different than lying. Saying audited financials would be posted in a day a month ago and then not doing it and repeatedly delaying it and then having it turn out they don't even exist is lying. These guys are liars and anyone who owns the stock is silly.
Standing by a decision in the face of overwhelming new and emerging evidence that the decision was wrong is not intelligent: it's stupid.
Right, you have to qualify to see the UFOC...
Greetings bagholders,
Where's that PR?
Well first of all, I think that one of the paradoxes of investing in restaurant stocks is this: "The number of restaurants in operation has absolutely nothing to do with the value of the company."
A restaurant in itself is a liability. You have to pay rent/other overhead, etc. There's no underlying asset in most cases (unless it's real estate which would be on the balance sheet). The value of a restaurant stems from its ability to generate great returns, which is a function of the concept.
Look at it like this:
Pizza Inn (Nasdaq: PZZI) has a market cap of 17 million dollars, and an enterprise value of around 25 million. It has a total of 391 restaurants, 387 of which are franchised. Why is it worth so little? The restaurants don't make money, so the whole operation is basically one gigantic liability. "Owning" (leasing) a bunch of spaces and having restaurants there doesn't mean anything and, in and of itself, is not a harbinger of value.
uWink, I believe (along with many others), has the potential to generate tremendous returns on investment, and so it has a higher value than a company that can't do that, no matter how few restaurants uWink has in operation at this moment.
This is all my opinion of course.
The whole paid basher thing is a myth...show me some evidence that these people who are paid "5 cents for each response" actually exist
A rational decision based on the information you have would be to sell because this company is a scam being run by liars.
hahahahaha....ahahahaha..."slight delay" was the exact phrase Petar used to describe why the audited financials weren't posted more than a month ago...how's that slight delay doing Petar?
And they're doing damage control? Lying about promising a PR to restore shareholder confidence and then not delivering is damage control? Damn, with damage control like that, who needs damage?